Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Maricopa County, 43580-43581 [E7-15119]
Download as PDF
43580
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 150 / Monday, August 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA–2007–
28881; Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–
263–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by September 20, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas
Model DC–9–11, DC–9–12, DC–9–13, DC–9–
14, DC–9–15, DC–9–15F, DC–9–21, DC–9–31,
DC–9–32, DC–9–32 (VC–9C), DC–9–32F, DC–
9–33F, DC–9–34, DC–9–34F, DC–9–32F (C–
9A, C–9B), DC–9–41, and DC–9–51 airplanes,
certificated in any category, equipped with a
tail cone evacuation slide container installed
in accordance with supplemental type
certificate (STC) ST735SO.
Initial Actions To Address Slide Deployment
Failures
(f) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD: Modify the tail cone slide in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. Northwest Airlines STC
ST01967CH, issued March 19, 2007, is one
approved method.
Note 1: STC ST01967CH refers to
Northwest Airlines, Drawing 9B25–41477,
Revision B, dated September 14, 2006; and
Northwest Airlines, Drawing 9B25–90399,
Revision D, dated December 21, 2006; as
additional sources of service information for
modifying the tail cone slide.
Repeat Deployment and Terminating Action
(g) Within 150 flight cycles after doing the
modification required by paragraph (f) of this
AD, or within 150 days after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later: Do
additional tail cone drops and slide
deployments on a minimum of 10 percent of
an operator’s fleet of affected airplanes (if
fewer than 10 airplanes in the fleet: At least
one airplane).
(1) If the tailcone and slide deployments
are successful according to the applicable
McDonnell Douglas DC–9 maintenance
manual, no further action is required by this
AD.
(2) If any tailcone and slide deployment is
unsuccessful according to the applicable
McDonnell Douglas DC–9 maintenance
manual, before further flight, repair in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO, FAA.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30,
2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–15237 Filed 8–3–07; 8:45 am]
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from several reports of
inadvertent tail cone deployments in which
the tail cone slide failed to deploy. We are
issuing this AD to ensure that the tail cone
evacuation slide deploys correctly; failure of
the slide to deploy during an emergency
evacuation could result in injury to
flightcrew and passengers.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Revisions to the Arizona State
Implementation Plan, Maricopa County
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Aug 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2007–0610; FRL–8448–7]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Maricopa County
portion of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns reductions of
particulate matter (PM) emissions from
the paving of unpaved road and use of
these reductions to satisfy the offset
requirements under the new source
review provisions of the Clean Air Act
as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
We are proposing to approve a local rule
to assure that the PM emission
reductions resulting from the road
paving meet the criteria for valid offsets
under the Act.
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by September 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2007–0610, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
https://www.regulations.gov is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
comment. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
E:\FR\FM\06AUP1.SGM
06AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 150 / Monday, August 6, 2007 / Proposed Rules
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily
Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4114,
Wong.Lily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal addresses the following local
rule: Maricopa County Air Quality
Department Rule 242, ‘‘Emission Offsets
Generated by the Voluntary Paving of
Unpaved Roads.’’ In the Rules and
Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are approving this local
rule in a direct final action without
prior proposal because we believe these
SIP revisions are not controversial. If we
receive adverse comments, however, we
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: July 20, 2007.
Keith Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E7–15119 Filed 8–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
SUMMARY: This document corrects
several technical and typographical
errors in the proposed rule that was
issued on July 2, 2007 and appeared in
the July 12, 2007 Federal Register (72
FR 38122). The proposed rule addressed
Medicare Part B payment policy,
including the physician fee schedule
(PFS) that is applicable for calendar year
(CY) 2008. The proposed rule also
addressed refinements to relative value
units (RVUs) and physician self-referral
issues. Specifically, the errors pertain to
the following provisions: Drug
compendia, telehealth services,
competitive acquisition program (CAP),
end-stage renal disease (ESRD),
physician self-referral issues, therapy
standards and requirements, Physician
Quality Reporting Initiative, and the
payment impact on physician fee
schedule services.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane Milstead (410) 786–3355.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 07–3274 (72 FR 38122), the
proposed rule entitled ‘‘Medicare
Program; Proposed Revisions to
Payment Policies Under the Physician
Fee Schedule, and Other Part B Payment
Policies for CY 2008; Proposed
Revisions to the Payment Policies of
Ambulance Services Under the
Ambulance Fee Schedule for CY 2008;
and the Proposed Elimination of the EPrescribing Exemption for ComputerGenerated Facsimile Transmissions’’
(hereinafter referred to as the CY 2008
PFS proposed rule), there were
technical and typographical errors that
are identified and corrected in this
correction notice.
II. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 72–3274 of July 12, 2007
(72 FR 38211), make the following
corrections:
[CMS–1385–CN]
A. Corrections to the Preamble
RIN 0938–AO65
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
42 CFR Parts 409, 410, 411, 413, 414,
415, 418, 423, 424, 482, 484, 485, and
491
1. On page 38122, 3rd column, 14th
full paragraph, line 1 the phrase ‘‘Karen
Rinker (410) 786–0189’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘Karen Rinker (410) 786–0189 or
Kate Tillman (410) 786–9252’’.
2. On page 38123, 1st column, 1st full
paragraph, line 1, the phrase ‘‘Lisa
Ohrin (410) 786–4565’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘Lisa Ohrin (410) 786–4565 or
Joanne Sinsheimer (410) 786–4620’’.
3. On page 38125, 1st column, after
line 72, the phrase ‘‘SLPs Speechlanguage pathologists’’ is added.
4. On page 38145, 1st column, 1st full
paragraph, lines 21 and 22, the phrase
‘‘96118 through and 99620’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘96118 through 96120’’.
Medicare Program; Proposed
Revisions to Payment Policies Under
the Physician Fee Schedule, and Other
Part B Payment Policies for CY 2008;
Proposed Revisions to the Payment
Policies of Ambulance Services Under
the Ambulance Fee Schedule for CY
2008; and the Proposed Elimination of
the E-Prescribing Exemption for
Computer-Generated Facsimile
Transmissions; Corrections
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction notice.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Aug 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43581
5. On page 38154, 3rd column, 1st
paragraph, line 39, ‘‘suppler’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘supplier’’.
6. On page 38155, 1st column, 1st full
paragraph, line 24, ‘‘physician’s office
have also been used to’’, is corrected to
read ‘‘physician’s office to’’.
7. On page 38158, 3rd column, 2nd
full paragraph, line 5, ‘‘participating
CAP’’ is corrected to read ‘‘participating
CAP’’.
8. On page 38159, 3rd column, 1st full
paragraph, line 6, the phrase ‘‘using
prefilling’’ is corrected to read ‘‘using
prefilled’’.
9. On page 38160, 1st column, 1st full
paragraph, line 14, the phrase
‘‘pharmacy laws’’ is corrected to read
‘‘pharmacy laws)’’.
10. On page 38164, 1st column, 1st
full paragraph, line 14, the phrase
‘‘REPORT TO CONGRESS’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘Report to Congress’’.
11. On page 38179, 3rd column, line
3, the phrase ‘‘The physician or other
supplier’s’’ is corrected to read ‘‘The
physician’s or other supplier’s’’.
12. On page 38180,
a. Second column, lines 54 and 55,
the phrase ‘‘or through some other
means’’ is corrected to read ‘‘or through
some other means)’’.
b. Third column, 2nd full paragraph,
line 10, ‘‘an anti-markup’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘an anti-markup provision’’.
c. Third column, 3rd full paragraph,
lines 4 and 5, ‘‘a DHS’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘a designated health service’’.
13. On page 38181, 3rd column, 1st
full paragraph, lines 5 and 6, ‘‘a DHS’’
is corrected to read ‘‘a designated health
service’’.
14. On page 38182,
a. Second column, last paragraph,
lines 2 and 3, the phrase ‘‘the
prohibition of physician referrals’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘the prohibition on
physician referrals’’.
b. Third column, 1st full paragraph,
lines 4 and 5, the phrase ‘‘such as a
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
machine)’’ is corrected to read ‘‘such as
an MRI machine)’’.
15. On page 38183,
a. First column, 1st full paragraph,
(1) Lines 6 and 7, the phrase ‘‘by a
physician lessor to the entity.’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘by a physician lessor
to the entity lessee.’’
(2) Line 17, ‘‘for patient referred’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘for patients referred’’.
b. Second column, 1st full paragraph,
(1) Lines 3 and 4, the phrase ‘‘where
the parties have returned,’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘where a party has returned,’’.
(2) Lines 10 and 12, the phrase ‘‘we
might allow the parties to terminate the
period of disqualification’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘the period of disallowance may
terminate’’.
E:\FR\FM\06AUP1.SGM
06AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 150 (Monday, August 6, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43580-43581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-15119]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2007-0610; FRL-8448-7]
Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Maricopa
County
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Maricopa County
portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision
concerns reductions of particulate matter (PM) emissions from the
paving of unpaved road and use of these reductions to satisfy the
offset requirements under the new source review provisions of the Clean
Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are proposing to
approve a local rule to assure that the PM emission reductions
resulting from the road paving meet the criteria for valid offsets
under the Act.
DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by September 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2007-0610, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. https://www.regulations.gov is an
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy
[[Page 43581]]
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly
available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4114, Wong.Lily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rule: Maricopa County Air Quality Department Rule 242, ``Emission
Offsets Generated by the Voluntary Paving of Unpaved Roads.'' In the
Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are
approving this local rule in a direct final action without prior
proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial.
If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in
subsequent action based on this proposed rule.
We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.
Dated: July 20, 2007.
Keith Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E7-15119 Filed 8-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P