Restrictions on Legal Assistance to Aliens, 42363-42366 [E7-15043]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Proposed Rules
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This proposed action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Redesignation of an area to attainment
under section 107(d)(3)(e) of the CAA
does not impose any new requirements
on small entities. Redesignation is an
action that affects the status of a
geographical area and does not impose
any new regulatory requirements on
sources. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
proposes to approve pre-existing
requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required by state law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This proposed rule also does not have
tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
affects the status of a geographical area,
does not impose any new requirements
on sources, or allow a state to avoid
adopting or implementing other
requirements and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
CAA. This proposed rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
because it is not economically
significant and because the Agency does
not have reason to believe that the rule
concerns an environmental health risk
or safety risk that may
disproportionately affect children.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Aug 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission;
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the CAA. Redesignation is an action that
affects the status of a geographical area
but does not impose any new
requirements on sources. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This proposed
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 25, 2007.
J.I. Palmer, Jr.,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E7–14983 Filed 8–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1626
Restrictions on Legal Assistance to
Aliens
Legal Services Corporation.
Termination of Rulemaking and
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: LSC is terminating a
rulemaking it initiated in 2001 to
consider broad revisions to its
regulation on restrictions on legal
assistance. Contemporaneously, LSC is
initiating a new rulemaking to consider
a proposal of limited scope to amend
section 1626.10(a) of this regulation to
permit LSC grant recipients to provide
legal assistance to otherwise financially
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42363
eligible citizens of the Federated States
of Micronesia, the Republic of the
Marshall Islands and the Republic of
Palau legally residing in the United
States.
The open rulemaking published
on September 10, 2001 (66 FR 46977) is
terminated as of August 2, 2007.
Comments on this NPRM are due on
September 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
NPRM may be submitted by mail, fax or
e-mail to Mattie Cohan, Senior Assistant
General Counsel, Office of Legal Affairs,
Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007;
202–295–1624 (ph); 202–337–6519 (fax);
mcohan@lsc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mattie Cohan, Senior Assistant General
Counsel, 202–295–1624 (ph);
mcohan@lsc.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Termination of Open Rulemaking
The LSC Board of Directors identified
45 CFR Part 1626 as an appropriate
subject for rulemaking on January 27,
2001. On June 30, 2001, the LSC
President and the Chair of the
Operations and Regulations Committee
made a determination to proceed with
the initiation of a Negotiated
Rulemaking to consider amendments to
Part 1626. In accordance with the LSC
Rulemaking Protocol, LSC published a
notice in the Federal Register formally
soliciting suggestions for appointment
to the Negotiated Rulemaking Working
Group from the regulated community,
its clients, advocates, the organized bar
and other interested parties (66 FR
46977, September 10, 2001). After
receiving submissions of interest, a
Working Group was appointed. Each
organization which timely requested to
participate was appointed to the
Working Group. The Working Group
met three times without coming to
consensus on several issues.
Subsequently, work on the 2001
rulemaking was deferred in 2003 by the
previous Board of Directors pending the
appointment and confirmation of the
present Board. No further action on the
rulemaking has been taken since that
time.
During the past several years as LSC
has considered its rulemaking agenda,
neither Management nor recipients have
suggested reinitiating work on this
broad rulemaking. As such, LSC is of
the opinion that consideration of broad
revision of Part 1626 is no longer
necessary or appropriate. Accordingly,
with the publication of this notice LSC
is terminating the open rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
42364
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Proposed Rules
New Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
LSC-funded legal services providers
are permitted to provide legal assistance
only to citizens of the United States and
aliens upon whom eligibility has been
expressly conferred by statute. LSC
regulations at 45 CFR Part 1626
implement the various existing statutory
authorities and set forth the eligibility
standards based on citizenship and
eligible alien status. Since 1996 Part
1626 has limited the eligibility of
citizens of the Republic of the Marshall
Islands (‘‘RMI’’) and the Federated
States of Micronesia (‘‘FSM’’) and the
Republic of Palau to services provided
in those respective nations (unless the
applicant is otherwise eligible under
Part 1626). In connection with LSC’s
development of a 2007 Rulemaking
Agenda, the Legal Aid Society of
Hawai’i (LASH) and Legal Aid of
Arkansas (LAA) have both requested
that LSC engage in rulemaking to
change the section 1626.10(a) to provide
for the eligibility of citizens of RMI,
FSM and Palau legally residing in the
United States for legal assistance from
LSC-funded programs.
LSC agrees that there is sufficient
reason and authority for LSC to amend
its regulation in this regard. To that end,
the Operations and Regulations
Committee of the LSC Board of Directors
considered a Draft NPRM and the Board
of Directors approved this NPRM for
publication and comment at their
respective meetings on July 28, 2007.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
History of FAS Eligibility for Legal
Assistance From LSC-Funded Programs
At the time of the creation of LSC in
1974, the countries that are now the
sovereign nations of the Republic of the
Marshall Islands (‘‘RMI’’), the Federated
States of Micronesia (‘‘FSM’’), and the
Republic of Palau were possessions of
the United States, known as the Trust
Territories of the Pacific Islands (‘‘the
Trust Territories’’). The LSC Act defined
the Trust Territories as a ‘‘State’’ for the
purposes of the Act. The Act thus
conferred eligibility for LSC-funded
legal services to Trust Territory
residents to the same extent provided to
residents of any other State of the
United States. Section 1002(8) of the
LSC Act, 42 U.S.C. 2996a(8).
In 1983, Congress placed the first
statutory restrictions on representation
of aliens on LSC recipients in LSC’s
appropriations bill for that year, Public
Law 97–377. That law provided that
none of the funds appropriated could be
expended to provide legal assistance for
or on behalf of any alien unless the alien
was a resident of the U.S. and otherwise
met certain statutorily specified criteria.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Aug 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
On its face, this language would have
appeared to imply that all non-U.S.
citizens, including residents of RMI,
FSM and Palau would be subject to
these restrictions, notwithstanding their
eligibility under the LSC Act. To deal
with this problem, LSC included a
‘‘special eligibility section’’ (§ 1626.10)
in the implementing regulations on
representation of aliens, 45 CFR part
1626, to exempt residents of the Trust
Territory from the alien restrictions
imposed by Congress.
In 1986 the trust governing the
relationship between the U.S. and the
Trust Territories was terminated. At that
time the former Trust Territories were
recognized as independent nations and
a new relationship with RMI, FSM and
Palau was created by the signing of two
Compacts of Free Association, one with
RMI and FSM and the other with Palau.
The Compact with RMI and FSM
contemplates the provision of certain
services and programs of the U.S. to
those nations. Specifically, section 224
of the Compact of Free Association with
RMI and FSM provides that:
The Government of the United States and
the Government of the Marshall Islands or
the Federated States of Micronesia may agree
from time to time to the extension of
additional United States grant assistance,
services and programs as provided by the
laws of the United States, to the Marshall
Islands or the Federated States of Micronesia,
respectively.
The Compact of Free Association Act
of 1985 (‘‘CFA Act’’) (Pub. L. 99–239,
codified at 48 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.),
which implemented the Compact,
provides express authority for the
provision of LSC-funded legal services.
Specifically, section 105(h)(1)(A) of the
CFA Act provides that:
* * * pursuant to section 224 of the
Compact the programs and services of the
[Legal Services Corporation] shall be made
available to the Federated States of
Micronesia and to the Marshall Islands.
The implementing act for the
Compact with Palau makes section 105
of the CFA Act applicable to the
Republic of Palau. 48 U.S.C. 1932(b).1
After the signing of the respective
Compacts and the corresponding
implementing statutes, the FAS
remained covered by the special
eligibility section of Part 1626,
notwithstanding their change in legal
`
status vis-a-vis their relationship with
the United States. In 1989 that section
of the regulation was amended to make
the section more precise in light of the
1 RMI, FSM and Palau are collectively referred to
as the ‘‘Freely Associated States’’ or ‘‘FAS.’’ This
designation will be used throughout the remainder
of the supplementary information section.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
termination of the trust. Under this
version of the rule, the special eligibility
section provided:
(a) Micronesia. The alien restriction stated
in the appropriations acts is not applicable to
the legal services program in the following
Pacific island entities:
(1) Commonwealth of the Northern
Marianas;
(2) Republic of Palau;
(3) Federated States of Micronesia;
(4) Republic of the Marshall Islands
All citizens of these entities are eligible to
receive legal assistance, provided they are
otherwise eligible under the [LSC] Act.
54 FR 18812 (April 29, 1989). The
preamble to the Final Rule adopting this
language explained that this change was
intended to ‘‘restate[] congressional
intent that residents of these political
entities be eligible to be clients of a legal
services program.’’ Id. at 18110. The
special eligibility section addressing the
FAS remained as set forth above until
1996.
As a result of new statutory
restrictions contained in the LSC FY
1996 appropriations legislation (Pub. L.
104–134), additional changes to Part
1626 were made in 1996. Although the
statutory amendments did not address
this issue, § 1626.10(a) was again
revised, this time in response to
comments from the LSC Office of
Inspector General (OIG). As explained
in the preamble to the 1996 Final Rule:
The OIG suggested that both the prior rule
and the interim rule dealt with the question
of special eligibility incorrectly and urged
that the final rule refer only to the legal
services programs serving people who were
citizens of those jurisdictions. The effect of
this change would be to make financially
eligible citizens of the Federated States of
Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall
Islands and the Republic of Palau only
eligible for legal services from the recipients
serving those areas * * *. They would not be
eligible for services from any other recipients
unless they also came within one of the
categories of eligible aliens listed in section
1626.5 * * *.
62 FR 19413 (April 21, 1997). The OIG’s
comments were based upon its
interpretation of the CFA Act that the
language of the CFA Act provides
authority for the provision of services
within those nations, but does not
expressly confer individual eligibility
for services to the citizens of those
nations without reference to where the
service is to be provided. The Board
considered the matter, agreed with the
OIG analysis, and revised § 1626.10(a)
as follows.
This part [1626] is not applicable to
recipients providing services in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Republic of Palau, the Federated
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Proposed Rules
States of Micronesia, or the Republic of the
Marshall Islands.
62 FR 19413 (April 21, 1997); 45 CFR
1626.10(a). Thus, since 1996 otherwise
financially eligible residents of the FAS
seeking assistance from legal services
providers in the United States may only
receive such assistance if they meet the
alien eligibility requirements of
§ 1626.5.
Alternative Interpretation of the
Compact Act
During the last session of Congress,
legislation was passed in the Senate by
unanimous consent on September 29,
2006, which would have definitively
clarified the issue by clearly stating that
LSC services were to be available to the
citizens of the FAS. Specifically, section
5 of S.1830, provided:
SEC. 5. AVAILABILITY OF LEGAL
SERVICES.
Section 105(f)(1)(C) of the Compact of Free
Association Amendments Act of 2003 (48
U.S.C. 1921d(f)(1)(C)) is amended by
inserting before the period at the end the
following: ‘‘, which shall also continue to be
available to the citizens of the Federated
States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau,
and the Republic of the Marshall Islands who
legally reside in the United States (including
territories and possessions)’’.
The report accompanying S.1830
explained that:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Section 5 clarifies that section 105(f)(1)(C)
of the CFAAA is intended to continue
eligibility for the programs and services of
the Legal Services Corporation for FSM and
RMI migrants who legally reside in the
United States. Legal Services Corporation
eligibility was extended by the first Compact
Act in 1986 (Pub. L. 99–239), but in 1996,
without any further action by Congress, the
Legal Services Corporation, by rule,
terminated the eligibility of FSM and RMI
migrants. Section 104(e) of the original
Compact Act, and of the CFAAA, state that
it is ‘not the intent of Congress to cause any
adverse consequences for an affected area,’
which are defined as Hawaii, Guam, the
CNMI, and American Samoa. The Legal
Services Corporation is one of those
programs which had assisted local
communities, in both the ‘affected areas’ and
in the mainland U.S., in responding to the
impacts and needs of FSM and RMI citizens
who were residing in U.S. communities. This
section would restore eligibility as it existed
from 1986 to 1996.
Similar legislation was introduced in
the House, but was not acted on during
the course of the 109th Congress.
Accordingly, there was no final
legislation enacted into law on this
subject in the last Congress. More
recently, on January 12, 2007, S. 283,
the Compact of Free Association
Amendments Act was introduced in the
Senate. On February 15, 2007, the bill
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Aug 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
was reported out of the Senate
Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources, accompanied by a written
report. The operative language of the
bill and report dealing with the
availability of legal assistance from LSC
recipients to citizens of the FAS,
regardless of where they are obtaining
those services, is the same as in last
year’s Senate bill (quoted above). A
similar bill, H.R. 2705, has also been
introduced in the House. As of the
publication of this notice, both of the
bills are still pending.
In addition, LSC received a letter
dated June 1, 2007, from David Cohen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Insular
Affairs at the Department of Interior. In
his letter, Deputy Assistant Secretary
Cohen stated:
42365
Need for Amendment of the
Regulation—FAS Citizens in the United
States
I can assure you that it is consistent with
Federal policy under the Compacts and the
[implementing] public laws * * * to allow
FAS citizens lawfully resident in the United
States to receive LSC services. * * * We are
not aware of any intention to permit the
extension of LSC benefits to FAS citizens in
the FAS but to prevent the extension of those
benefits to FAS citizens during their lawful
residence in the United States.
Subsequently, representatives of LSC
met with the Deputy Assistant
Secretary, several members of his staff
and an attorney from the Department of
State. They reiterated their
understanding of the Compact and the
CFA Act. In particular, they explained
that the United States and the FAS
countries negotiated the Compacts as
essentially an aid package and that the
Departments of Interior and State, as
well as the FAS nations themselves,
consider the extension of benefits to the
FAS to include the extension of benefits
to FAS citizens, regardless of where
those citizens are lawfully residing (in
the FAS or the United States). As an
example, they noted that the CFA Act
extends the Pell Grant (educational
grants) program to the FAS and that the
grants are provided to FAS citizens
regardless of whether they are attending
institutions of higher education in the
FAS or in the United States. Similarly,
FAS citizens are eligible for Job Corps
services being provided in the United
States.
In light of the above, it would appear
that LSC’s interpretation of the CFA Act,
while permissible, was not the only
permissible reading and perhaps, in
hindsight, not the best available reading.
Moreover, LSC appears to be within its
legal authority under the law to amend
§ 1626.10 to permit FAS citizens to
receive legal assistance anywhere LSC
services are provided without requiring
independent eligibility under Part 1626.
When LSC was created in 1974, there
were probably no more than a few
thousand Micronesians living in Guam
and Hawai’i, and a scattering in the
continental United States. Even when
the first Compact was negotiated in
1986, there were probably still less than
ten thousand Micronesians living
within U.S. territory, still mostly in
Guam and Honolulu. However, when
the Compact was renegotiated and
extended in 2002 it was then known
that the migration pattern was showing
greatly increased numbers in the
continental United States. According to
the Embassy of FSM there are, in
addition to the traditionally high
populations of Micronesians in Guam
and Hawai’i, at least 30,000 to 40,000
FSM citizens living or going to school
in the continental U.S. Further, LAA has
noted in its request to LSC for
rulemaking on this issue that there are
also 6,000 to 10,000 Marshallese living
in Northwest Arkansas alone.
Thus, while there was relatively little
demand for legal services among FAS
citizens in the United States in 1996, the
increased migration of FAS citizens to
the United States has significantly
increased the potential demand for legal
services among members of that
community. The inability of financially
eligible FAS citizens in the U.S. to
access legal services from LSC programs
assistance is a growing problem for the
U.S. FAS community. LASH, for
example, has noted that that FAS
citizens working in Hawai’i are more
likely to be victims of unscrupulous
employers because they believe that
such citizens have little recourse to legal
services to protect their employment
rights.
Proposed Amendment of Section
1626.10(a)
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
LSC is proposing to amend section
1626.10(a) to redesignate the existing
language in paragraph (a) as paragraph
(a)(1) and to add a new paragraph (a)(2)
to read as follows: ‘‘All citizens of the
Republic of Palau, the Federated States
of Micronesia, and the Republic of the
Marshall Islands residing in the United
States are eligible to receive legal
assistance provided that are they
otherwise eligible under the Act.’’ This
language makes explicit that FAS
citizens are eligible under Part 1626 for
legal assistance and is consistent with
the other eligibility provision in section
1626.10 addressing the eligibility of
Canadian-born American Indians at
least 50% Indians by blood, members of
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
42366
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the Texas Band of Kickapoo and foreign
nationals seeing assistance pursuant to
the Hague Convention. 45 CFR
1626.10(b); 1626.10(c); and 1626.10(d).
The ‘‘otherwise eligible’’ language is
meant to refer to financial eligibility (for
the provision of LSC-funded legal
assistance’’) and to the permissibility of
the legal assistance provided under
applicable law and regulation.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1626
Aliens, Grant programs—law, Legal
services, Migrant labor, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth above, and under
the authority of 42 U.S.C. 2996g(e), LSC
proposes to amend 45 CFR Part 1626 as
follows:
PART 1626—Restrictions on Legal
Assistance to Aliens
1. The authority citation for part 1626
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 104–208, 110 Stat 1321;
Pub L. 104–134, 110 Stat. 3009.
2. Amend § 1626.10 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 1626.10
Special eligibility questions.
(a)(1) This part is not applicable to
recipients providing services in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Republic of Palau, the
Federated States of Micronesia, or the
Republic of the Marshall Islands.
(2) All citizens of the Republic of
Palau, the Federated States of
Micronesia, and the Republic of the
Marshall Islands residing in the United
States are eligible to receive legal
assistance provided that are they
otherwise eligible under the Act.
*
*
*
*
*
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
provide for interim payments under
cost-reimbursement contracts for
services within 30 days, instead of the
current DoD policy of making payments
within 14 days. The change will not
apply to small business concerns.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
October 1, 2007, to be considered in the
formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by DFARS Case 2006–D066,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2006–D066 in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: (703) 602–7887.
• Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Mr. John
McPherson, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(CPF),
IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3062.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, Crystal
Square 4, Suite 200A, 241 18th Street,
Arlington, VA 22202–3402.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John McPherson, (703) 602–0296.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Payments on
Cost-Reimbursement Contracts for
Services (DFARS Case 2006–D066)
A. Background
DFARS 232.906 presently provides for
interim payments on costreimbursement contracts for services
within 14 days after receipt of a proper
payment request. The proposed rule
would revise this policy to provide for
payment to other than small business
concerns within 30 days. The proposed
change will allow DoD to better cash
manage payments without having a
significant impact on small business
concerns. The proposed change is
consistent with the policies of other
Government agencies, which do not pay
in 14 days. These payments are subject
to the Prompt Payment Act.
This proposed rule was not subject to
Office of Management and Budget
review under Executive Order 12866,
dated September 30, 1993.
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E7–15043 Filed 8–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 216, 232, and 252
RIN 0750–AF71
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Proposed rule with request for
comments.
ACTION:
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Aug 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because the proposed rule makes
no change to payment procedures for
small business concerns. Therefore, DoD
has not performed an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis. DoD invites
comments from small businesses and
other interested parties. DoD also will
consider comments from small entities
concerning the affected DFARS subparts
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such
comments should be submitted
separately and should cite DFARS Case
2006–D066.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply, because the proposed rule
does not impose any information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 216,
232, and 252
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48
CFR Parts 216, 232, and 252 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
Parts 216, 232, and 252 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
Chapter 1.
PART 216—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
2. Section 216.307 is added to read as
follows:
216.307
Contract clauses.
(a)(i) The following apply to interim
payments on cost-reimbursement
contracts for services:
(A) For contracts with other than
small business concerns, insert the
standard due date of the ‘‘30th’’ day in
paragraph (a)(3) of the clause at FAR
52.216–7.
(B) For contracts with small business
concerns, insert the ‘‘14th’’ day in
paragraph (a)(3) of the clause at FAR
52.216–7.
(ii) For interim payments on costreimbursement contracts for other than
services, insert the ‘‘14th’’ day in
paragraph (a)(3) of the clause at FAR
52.216–7.
PART 232—CONTRACT FINANCING
3. Section 232.906 is revised to read
as follows:
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 148 (Thursday, August 2, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42363-42366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-15043]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1626
Restrictions on Legal Assistance to Aliens
AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.
ACTION: Termination of Rulemaking and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: LSC is terminating a rulemaking it initiated in 2001 to
consider broad revisions to its regulation on restrictions on legal
assistance. Contemporaneously, LSC is initiating a new rulemaking to
consider a proposal of limited scope to amend section 1626.10(a) of
this regulation to permit LSC grant recipients to provide legal
assistance to otherwise financially eligible citizens of the Federated
States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands and the
Republic of Palau legally residing in the United States.
DATES: The open rulemaking published on September 10, 2001 (66 FR
46977) is terminated as of August 2, 2007. Comments on this NPRM are
due on September 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the NPRM may be submitted by mail, fax
or e-mail to Mattie Cohan, Senior Assistant General Counsel, Office of
Legal Affairs, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20007; 202-295-1624 (ph); 202-337-6519 (fax);
mcohan@lsc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mattie Cohan, Senior Assistant General
Counsel, 202-295-1624 (ph); mcohan@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Termination of Open Rulemaking
The LSC Board of Directors identified 45 CFR Part 1626 as an
appropriate subject for rulemaking on January 27, 2001. On June 30,
2001, the LSC President and the Chair of the Operations and Regulations
Committee made a determination to proceed with the initiation of a
Negotiated Rulemaking to consider amendments to Part 1626. In
accordance with the LSC Rulemaking Protocol, LSC published a notice in
the Federal Register formally soliciting suggestions for appointment to
the Negotiated Rulemaking Working Group from the regulated community,
its clients, advocates, the organized bar and other interested parties
(66 FR 46977, September 10, 2001). After receiving submissions of
interest, a Working Group was appointed. Each organization which timely
requested to participate was appointed to the Working Group. The
Working Group met three times without coming to consensus on several
issues. Subsequently, work on the 2001 rulemaking was deferred in 2003
by the previous Board of Directors pending the appointment and
confirmation of the present Board. No further action on the rulemaking
has been taken since that time.
During the past several years as LSC has considered its rulemaking
agenda, neither Management nor recipients have suggested reinitiating
work on this broad rulemaking. As such, LSC is of the opinion that
consideration of broad revision of Part 1626 is no longer necessary or
appropriate. Accordingly, with the publication of this notice LSC is
terminating the open rulemaking.
[[Page 42364]]
New Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
LSC-funded legal services providers are permitted to provide legal
assistance only to citizens of the United States and aliens upon whom
eligibility has been expressly conferred by statute. LSC regulations at
45 CFR Part 1626 implement the various existing statutory authorities
and set forth the eligibility standards based on citizenship and
eligible alien status. Since 1996 Part 1626 has limited the eligibility
of citizens of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (``RMI'') and the
Federated States of Micronesia (``FSM'') and the Republic of Palau to
services provided in those respective nations (unless the applicant is
otherwise eligible under Part 1626). In connection with LSC's
development of a 2007 Rulemaking Agenda, the Legal Aid Society of
Hawai'i (LASH) and Legal Aid of Arkansas (LAA) have both requested that
LSC engage in rulemaking to change the section 1626.10(a) to provide
for the eligibility of citizens of RMI, FSM and Palau legally residing
in the United States for legal assistance from LSC-funded programs.
LSC agrees that there is sufficient reason and authority for LSC to
amend its regulation in this regard. To that end, the Operations and
Regulations Committee of the LSC Board of Directors considered a Draft
NPRM and the Board of Directors approved this NPRM for publication and
comment at their respective meetings on July 28, 2007.
History of FAS Eligibility for Legal Assistance From LSC-Funded
Programs
At the time of the creation of LSC in 1974, the countries that are
now the sovereign nations of the Republic of the Marshall Islands
(``RMI''), the Federated States of Micronesia (``FSM''), and the
Republic of Palau were possessions of the United States, known as the
Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands (``the Trust Territories'').
The LSC Act defined the Trust Territories as a ``State'' for the
purposes of the Act. The Act thus conferred eligibility for LSC-funded
legal services to Trust Territory residents to the same extent provided
to residents of any other State of the United States. Section 1002(8)
of the LSC Act, 42 U.S.C. 2996a(8).
In 1983, Congress placed the first statutory restrictions on
representation of aliens on LSC recipients in LSC's appropriations bill
for that year, Public Law 97-377. That law provided that none of the
funds appropriated could be expended to provide legal assistance for or
on behalf of any alien unless the alien was a resident of the U.S. and
otherwise met certain statutorily specified criteria. On its face, this
language would have appeared to imply that all non-U.S. citizens,
including residents of RMI, FSM and Palau would be subject to these
restrictions, notwithstanding their eligibility under the LSC Act. To
deal with this problem, LSC included a ``special eligibility section''
(Sec. 1626.10) in the implementing regulations on representation of
aliens, 45 CFR part 1626, to exempt residents of the Trust Territory
from the alien restrictions imposed by Congress.
In 1986 the trust governing the relationship between the U.S. and
the Trust Territories was terminated. At that time the former Trust
Territories were recognized as independent nations and a new
relationship with RMI, FSM and Palau was created by the signing of two
Compacts of Free Association, one with RMI and FSM and the other with
Palau. The Compact with RMI and FSM contemplates the provision of
certain services and programs of the U.S. to those nations.
Specifically, section 224 of the Compact of Free Association with RMI
and FSM provides that:
The Government of the United States and the Government of the
Marshall Islands or the Federated States of Micronesia may agree
from time to time to the extension of additional United States grant
assistance, services and programs as provided by the laws of the
United States, to the Marshall Islands or the Federated States of
Micronesia, respectively.
The Compact of Free Association Act of 1985 (``CFA Act'') (Pub. L.
99-239, codified at 48 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.), which implemented the
Compact, provides express authority for the provision of LSC-funded
legal services. Specifically, section 105(h)(1)(A) of the CFA Act
provides that:
* * * pursuant to section 224 of the Compact the programs and
services of the [Legal Services Corporation] shall be made available
to the Federated States of Micronesia and to the Marshall Islands.
The implementing act for the Compact with Palau makes section 105
of the CFA Act applicable to the Republic of Palau. 48 U.S.C.
1932(b).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ RMI, FSM and Palau are collectively referred to as the
``Freely Associated States'' or ``FAS.'' This designation will be
used throughout the remainder of the supplementary information
section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After the signing of the respective Compacts and the corresponding
implementing statutes, the FAS remained covered by the special
eligibility section of Part 1626, notwithstanding their change in legal
status vis-[agrave]-vis their relationship with the United States. In
1989 that section of the regulation was amended to make the section
more precise in light of the termination of the trust. Under this
version of the rule, the special eligibility section provided:
(a) Micronesia. The alien restriction stated in the
appropriations acts is not applicable to the legal services program
in the following Pacific island entities:
(1) Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas;
(2) Republic of Palau;
(3) Federated States of Micronesia;
(4) Republic of the Marshall Islands
All citizens of these entities are eligible to receive legal
assistance, provided they are otherwise eligible under the [LSC]
Act.
54 FR 18812 (April 29, 1989). The preamble to the Final Rule adopting
this language explained that this change was intended to ``restate[]
congressional intent that residents of these political entities be
eligible to be clients of a legal services program.'' Id. at 18110. The
special eligibility section addressing the FAS remained as set forth
above until 1996.
As a result of new statutory restrictions contained in the LSC FY
1996 appropriations legislation (Pub. L. 104-134), additional changes
to Part 1626 were made in 1996. Although the statutory amendments did
not address this issue, Sec. 1626.10(a) was again revised, this time
in response to comments from the LSC Office of Inspector General (OIG).
As explained in the preamble to the 1996 Final Rule:
The OIG suggested that both the prior rule and the interim rule
dealt with the question of special eligibility incorrectly and urged
that the final rule refer only to the legal services programs
serving people who were citizens of those jurisdictions. The effect
of this change would be to make financially eligible citizens of the
Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands
and the Republic of Palau only eligible for legal services from the
recipients serving those areas * * *. They would not be eligible for
services from any other recipients unless they also came within one
of the categories of eligible aliens listed in section 1626.5 * * *.
62 FR 19413 (April 21, 1997). The OIG's comments were based upon its
interpretation of the CFA Act that the language of the CFA Act provides
authority for the provision of services within those nations, but does
not expressly confer individual eligibility for services to the
citizens of those nations without reference to where the service is to
be provided. The Board considered the matter, agreed with the OIG
analysis, and revised Sec. 1626.10(a) as follows.
This part [1626] is not applicable to recipients providing
services in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the
Republic of Palau, the Federated
[[Page 42365]]
States of Micronesia, or the Republic of the Marshall Islands.
62 FR 19413 (April 21, 1997); 45 CFR 1626.10(a). Thus, since 1996
otherwise financially eligible residents of the FAS seeking assistance
from legal services providers in the United States may only receive
such assistance if they meet the alien eligibility requirements of
Sec. 1626.5.
Alternative Interpretation of the Compact Act
During the last session of Congress, legislation was passed in the
Senate by unanimous consent on September 29, 2006, which would have
definitively clarified the issue by clearly stating that LSC services
were to be available to the citizens of the FAS. Specifically, section
5 of S.1830, provided:
SEC. 5. AVAILABILITY OF LEGAL SERVICES.
Section 105(f)(1)(C) of the Compact of Free Association
Amendments Act of 2003 (48 U.S.C. 1921d(f)(1)(C)) is amended by
inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, which
shall also continue to be available to the citizens of the Federated
States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau, and the Republic of the
Marshall Islands who legally reside in the United States (including
territories and possessions)''.
The report accompanying S.1830 explained that:
Section 5 clarifies that section 105(f)(1)(C) of the CFAAA is
intended to continue eligibility for the programs and services of
the Legal Services Corporation for FSM and RMI migrants who legally
reside in the United States. Legal Services Corporation eligibility
was extended by the first Compact Act in 1986 (Pub. L. 99-239), but
in 1996, without any further action by Congress, the Legal Services
Corporation, by rule, terminated the eligibility of FSM and RMI
migrants. Section 104(e) of the original Compact Act, and of the
CFAAA, state that it is `not the intent of Congress to cause any
adverse consequences for an affected area,' which are defined as
Hawaii, Guam, the CNMI, and American Samoa. The Legal Services
Corporation is one of those programs which had assisted local
communities, in both the `affected areas' and in the mainland U.S.,
in responding to the impacts and needs of FSM and RMI citizens who
were residing in U.S. communities. This section would restore
eligibility as it existed from 1986 to 1996.
Similar legislation was introduced in the House, but was not acted
on during the course of the 109th Congress. Accordingly, there was no
final legislation enacted into law on this subject in the last
Congress. More recently, on January 12, 2007, S. 283, the Compact of
Free Association Amendments Act was introduced in the Senate. On
February 15, 2007, the bill was reported out of the Senate Committee on
Energy and Natural Resources, accompanied by a written report. The
operative language of the bill and report dealing with the availability
of legal assistance from LSC recipients to citizens of the FAS,
regardless of where they are obtaining those services, is the same as
in last year's Senate bill (quoted above). A similar bill, H.R. 2705,
has also been introduced in the House. As of the publication of this
notice, both of the bills are still pending.
In addition, LSC received a letter dated June 1, 2007, from David
Cohen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Insular Affairs at the Department
of Interior. In his letter, Deputy Assistant Secretary Cohen stated:
I can assure you that it is consistent with Federal policy under
the Compacts and the [implementing] public laws * * * to allow FAS
citizens lawfully resident in the United States to receive LSC
services. * * * We are not aware of any intention to permit the
extension of LSC benefits to FAS citizens in the FAS but to prevent
the extension of those benefits to FAS citizens during their lawful
residence in the United States.
Subsequently, representatives of LSC met with the Deputy Assistant
Secretary, several members of his staff and an attorney from the
Department of State. They reiterated their understanding of the Compact
and the CFA Act. In particular, they explained that the United States
and the FAS countries negotiated the Compacts as essentially an aid
package and that the Departments of Interior and State, as well as the
FAS nations themselves, consider the extension of benefits to the FAS
to include the extension of benefits to FAS citizens, regardless of
where those citizens are lawfully residing (in the FAS or the United
States). As an example, they noted that the CFA Act extends the Pell
Grant (educational grants) program to the FAS and that the grants are
provided to FAS citizens regardless of whether they are attending
institutions of higher education in the FAS or in the United States.
Similarly, FAS citizens are eligible for Job Corps services being
provided in the United States.
In light of the above, it would appear that LSC's interpretation of
the CFA Act, while permissible, was not the only permissible reading
and perhaps, in hindsight, not the best available reading. Moreover,
LSC appears to be within its legal authority under the law to amend
Sec. 1626.10 to permit FAS citizens to receive legal assistance
anywhere LSC services are provided without requiring independent
eligibility under Part 1626.
Need for Amendment of the Regulation--FAS Citizens in the United States
When LSC was created in 1974, there were probably no more than a
few thousand Micronesians living in Guam and Hawai'i, and a scattering
in the continental United States. Even when the first Compact was
negotiated in 1986, there were probably still less than ten thousand
Micronesians living within U.S. territory, still mostly in Guam and
Honolulu. However, when the Compact was renegotiated and extended in
2002 it was then known that the migration pattern was showing greatly
increased numbers in the continental United States. According to the
Embassy of FSM there are, in addition to the traditionally high
populations of Micronesians in Guam and Hawai'i, at least 30,000 to
40,000 FSM citizens living or going to school in the continental U.S.
Further, LAA has noted in its request to LSC for rulemaking on this
issue that there are also 6,000 to 10,000 Marshallese living in
Northwest Arkansas alone.
Thus, while there was relatively little demand for legal services
among FAS citizens in the United States in 1996, the increased
migration of FAS citizens to the United States has significantly
increased the potential demand for legal services among members of that
community. The inability of financially eligible FAS citizens in the
U.S. to access legal services from LSC programs assistance is a growing
problem for the U.S. FAS community. LASH, for example, has noted that
that FAS citizens working in Hawai'i are more likely to be victims of
unscrupulous employers because they believe that such citizens have
little recourse to legal services to protect their employment rights.
Proposed Amendment of Section 1626.10(a)
LSC is proposing to amend section 1626.10(a) to redesignate the
existing language in paragraph (a) as paragraph (a)(1) and to add a new
paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows: ``All citizens of the Republic of
Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of the
Marshall Islands residing in the United States are eligible to receive
legal assistance provided that are they otherwise eligible under the
Act.'' This language makes explicit that FAS citizens are eligible
under Part 1626 for legal assistance and is consistent with the other
eligibility provision in section 1626.10 addressing the eligibility of
Canadian-born American Indians at least 50% Indians by blood, members
of
[[Page 42366]]
the Texas Band of Kickapoo and foreign nationals seeing assistance
pursuant to the Hague Convention. 45 CFR 1626.10(b); 1626.10(c); and
1626.10(d). The ``otherwise eligible'' language is meant to refer to
financial eligibility (for the provision of LSC-funded legal
assistance'') and to the permissibility of the legal assistance
provided under applicable law and regulation.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1626
Aliens, Grant programs--law, Legal services, Migrant labor,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth above, and under the authority of 42 U.S.C.
2996g(e), LSC proposes to amend 45 CFR Part 1626 as follows:
PART 1626--Restrictions on Legal Assistance to Aliens
1. The authority citation for part 1626 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 104-208, 110 Stat 1321; Pub L. 104-134, 110
Stat. 3009.
2. Amend Sec. 1626.10 by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1626.10 Special eligibility questions.
(a)(1) This part is not applicable to recipients providing services
in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of
Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, or the Republic of the
Marshall Islands.
(2) All citizens of the Republic of Palau, the Federated States of
Micronesia, and the Republic of the Marshall Islands residing in the
United States are eligible to receive legal assistance provided that
are they otherwise eligible under the Act.
* * * * *
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E7-15043 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P