Safety Zone for Marine Events; New River, Jacksonville, NC, 42307-42309 [E7-14939]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
No assistance was requested from any
small entity.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminates
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Aug 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42307
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
it has been determined that the
promulgation of operating regulations
for drawbridges are categorically
excluded.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
I
2. Revise § 117.579 to read as follows:
§ 117.579
Wicomico River (North Prong).
The draws of the Main Street and U.S.
50 bridges, mile 22.4, Salisbury,
Maryland shall open on signal if at least
four hours notice is given by calling the
telephone contact number at (410) 430–
7461.
Dated: July 24, 2007.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–14936 Filed 8–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. COTP North Carolina CGD05–
07–071]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone for Marine Events; New
River, Jacksonville, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary Safety Zone
during the ‘‘National Night Out’’, an
event to be held August 7, 2007 on the
New River, Jacksonville, North Carolina.
This safety zone is necessary to provide
for the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event. This action is
intended to temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in the New River to accommodate
a Helicopter Search and Rescue
demonstration and a fireworks display.
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
42308
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
This rule is effective from 5:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on August 7, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CGD05–07–
071 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (dpi), Fifth
Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford
Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704–
5004, between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
M. Sens, Project Manager, Inspections
and Investigations Branch, at (757) 398–
6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
position 34°44′45″ N 077°26′18″ W. The
Helicopter SAR Demonstration will
consist of a basket hoist from a Coast
Guard small boat. The fireworks display
will be launched from shore and will
have a fallout area over the waters of the
New River. The safety zone is necessary
to safe guard the SAR demonstration
team as well as the spectator fleet
expected by the sponsor. Due to the
need for vessel control during these
events, vessel traffic will be temporarily
restricted to provide for the safety of
SAR demonstration team, spectators and
transiting vessels.
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone on specified waters of the
New River, Jacksonville, North Carolina.
The regulated area includes all waters
within a 300 yard radius of position
34°44′45″ N 077°26′18″ W or
approximately one half nautical mile
south of the Hwy 17 bridge,
Jacksonville, North Carolina. The safety
zone will be in effect from 5:30 p.m. to
10 p.m. on August 7, 2007. The effect
will be to restrict general navigation in
the regulated area during the SAR
demonstration and the fireworks
display. Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area
during the enforcement period. The
Patrol Commander will notify the public
of specific enforcement times by Marine
Radio Safety Broadcast. These
regulations are needed to control vessel
traffic during the event to enhance the
safety of participants, spectators and
transiting vessels.
DATES:
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing
an NPRM would be impracticable and
contrary to public interest because
immediate action is needed to minimize
potential danger to the public during the
event. The necessary information to
determine whether the marine event
poses a threat to persons and vessels
was not provided to the Coast Guard in
sufficient time to publish an NPRM. The
potential dangers posed by the
helicopter demonstration and
pyrotechnic fireworks display, make a
safety zone necessary to provide for the
safety of spectator craft and other
vessels transiting the event area. The
Coast Guard will issue a broadcast
notice to mariners to advise mariners of
the restriction and on scene Coast Guard
and local law enforcement vessels will
also provide notice to mariners.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and for the
same reasons, the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date would be
contrary to the public interest, because
immediate action is needed to ensure
the safety of the event participants,
spectator craft and other vessels
transiting the event area. Advance
notifications will be made to users of
the New River, via marine information
broadcasts, local notice to mariners,
commercial radio stations and area
newspapers.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Background and Purpose
On August 7, 2007, the Jacksonville
Police Department will sponsor the
‘‘National Night Out’’ Helicopter Search
and Rescue (SAR) demonstration and
fireworks display. These events will
take place on the New River near
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Aug 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
Discussion of Rule
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this regulation restricts
vessel traffic from transiting the New
River, near Jacksonville, North Carolina
during the event, the effect of this
regulation will not be significant due to
the limited duration that the safety zone
will be in effect and the extensive
advance notifications that will be made
to the maritime community via marine
information broadcasts and area
newspapers so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the New
River, near Jacksonville, North Carolina
during the event.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule will be in
effect for only a short period, from 5:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on August 7, 2007.
Before the enforcement period, we will
issue maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the address
listed under ADDRESSES.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Aug 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42309
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
I
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–071 to
read as follows:
I
§ 165.T05–071 Safety zone; New River,
approximate one half mile south of the HWY
17 Bridge, south of Jacksonville, North
Carolina.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
includes all waters within a 300 yard
radius of position 34°44′45″ North
077°26′18″ West, approximately one
half nautical mile south of the HWY 17
bridge, Jacksonville, North Carolina. All
coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector North
Carolina.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector North Carolina with
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(c) Safety Zone regulations. (1) Except
for persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall: (i) Stop the vessel
immediately when directed to do so by
any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any official
patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 5:30 p.m. to 10
p.m. on August 7, 2007.
Dated: July 9, 2007.
William D. Lee,
Captain of the Port, Coast Guard Sector North
Carolina.
[FR Doc. E7–14939 Filed 8–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 148 (Thursday, August 2, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42307-42309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14939]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. COTP North Carolina CGD05-07-071]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone for Marine Events; New River, Jacksonville, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary Safety Zone during
the ``National Night Out'', an event to be held August 7, 2007 on the
New River, Jacksonville, North Carolina. This safety zone is necessary
to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the
New River to accommodate a Helicopter Search and Rescue demonstration
and a fireworks display.
[[Page 42308]]
DATES: This rule is effective from 5:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on August 7,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket CGD05-07-071 and are available for
inspection or copying at Commander (dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District,
431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704-5004, between 9 a.m.
and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. M. Sens, Project Manager,
Inspections and Investigations Branch, at (757) 398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM would be
impracticable and contrary to public interest because immediate action
is needed to minimize potential danger to the public during the event.
The necessary information to determine whether the marine event poses a
threat to persons and vessels was not provided to the Coast Guard in
sufficient time to publish an NPRM. The potential dangers posed by the
helicopter demonstration and pyrotechnic fireworks display, make a
safety zone necessary to provide for the safety of spectator craft and
other vessels transiting the event area. The Coast Guard will issue a
broadcast notice to mariners to advise mariners of the restriction and
on scene Coast Guard and local law enforcement vessels will also
provide notice to mariners.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and for the same reasons, the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the public interest, because
immediate action is needed to ensure the safety of the event
participants, spectator craft and other vessels transiting the event
area. Advance notifications will be made to users of the New River, via
marine information broadcasts, local notice to mariners, commercial
radio stations and area newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On August 7, 2007, the Jacksonville Police Department will sponsor
the ``National Night Out'' Helicopter Search and Rescue (SAR)
demonstration and fireworks display. These events will take place on
the New River near position 34[deg]44'45'' N 077[deg]26'18'' W. The
Helicopter SAR Demonstration will consist of a basket hoist from a
Coast Guard small boat. The fireworks display will be launched from
shore and will have a fallout area over the waters of the New River.
The safety zone is necessary to safe guard the SAR demonstration team
as well as the spectator fleet expected by the sponsor. Due to the need
for vessel control during these events, vessel traffic will be
temporarily restricted to provide for the safety of SAR demonstration
team, spectators and transiting vessels.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on specified waters
of the New River, Jacksonville, North Carolina. The regulated area
includes all waters within a 300 yard radius of position 34[deg]44'45''
N 077[deg]26'18'' W or approximately one half nautical mile south of
the Hwy 17 bridge, Jacksonville, North Carolina. The safety zone will
be in effect from 5:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on August 7, 2007. The effect
will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area during the
SAR demonstration and the fireworks display. Except for persons or
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or
vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area during the enforcement
period. The Patrol Commander will notify the public of specific
enforcement times by Marine Radio Safety Broadcast. These regulations
are needed to control vessel traffic during the event to enhance the
safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this regulation restricts vessel traffic from transiting
the New River, near Jacksonville, North Carolina during the event, the
effect of this regulation will not be significant due to the limited
duration that the safety zone will be in effect and the extensive
advance notifications that will be made to the maritime community via
marine information broadcasts and area newspapers so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit the New River, near Jacksonville, North Carolina during the
event.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will be in effect for only a short period, from 5:30 p.m. to 10
p.m. on August 7, 2007. Before the enforcement period, we will issue
maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork
[[Page 42309]]
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-071 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-071 Safety zone; New River, approximate one half mile
south of the HWY 17 Bridge, south of Jacksonville, North Carolina.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area includes all waters within a
300 yard radius of position 34[deg]44'45'' North 077[deg]26'18'' West,
approximately one half nautical mile south of the HWY 17 bridge,
Jacksonville, North Carolina. All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been designated by
the Commander, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina with a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(c) Safety Zone regulations. (1) Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area shall: (i)
Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any Official
Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any official patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 5:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on August 7, 2007.
Dated: July 9, 2007.
William D. Lee,
Captain of the Port, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina.
[FR Doc. E7-14939 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P