Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Wicomico River (North Prong), Salisbury, MD, 42306-42307 [E7-14936]
Download as PDF
42306
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(e) The Secretaries of the Interior,
Agriculture, and Defense and the
Chairman of the Tennessee Valley
Authority will develop a system for
documenting and reporting suspected
violations of the various provisions of
the Act. This system will reference a set
of procedures for use by officers,
employees, or agents of Federal agencies
to assist them in recognizing violations,
documenting relevant evidence, and
reporting assembled information to the
appropriate authorities. Methods
employed to document and report such
violations should be compatible with
existing agency reporting systems for
documenting violations of other
appropriate Federal statutes and
regulations. Summary information to be
included in the Secretary’s
comprehensive report will be based
upon the system developed by each
Federal land manager for documenting
suspected violations.
Dated: July 25, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. E7–14811 Filed 8–1–07; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD05–07–025]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Wicomico River (North Prong),
Salisbury, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing
the drawbridge operation regulations of
two Maryland Department of
Transportation (MDOT) bridges: The
Main Street and U.S. 50 Bridges, at mile
22.4, across Wicomico River (North
Prong) in Salisbury, MD. This final rule
will allow the bridges to open on signal
if four hours advance notice is given
and eliminate the continual attendance
of draw tender services while still
providing the reasonable needs of
navigation.
This rule is effective September
4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Aug 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr., Bridge
Administrator, Fifth Coast Guard
District, at (757) 398–6222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
On April 5, 2007, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulations; Wicomico River (North
Prong), Salisbury, MD’’ in the Federal
Register (72 FR 16752). We received no
comments on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Background and Purpose
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ACTION:
docket CGD05–07–025 and are available
for inspection or copying at Commander
(dpb), Fifth Coast Guard District,
Federal Building, 1st Floor, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA
23704–5004 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Fifth Coast Guard District
maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking.
The State Highway Administration
(SHA), a division under MDOT, is
responsible for the operation of both the
Main Street and U.S. 50 Bridges, at mile
22.4, across Wicomico River in
Salisbury. SHA requested advance
notification for vessel openings and a
reduction in draw tender services due to
the infrequency of requests for vessel
openings of the drawbridges.
The Main Street and U.S. 50 Bridges
have vertical clearances of four feet,
above mean high water, in the closedto-navigation position. The existing
operating regulations for these
drawbridges are set out in 33 CFR
§ 117.579, which requires the draws to
open on signal, except from 7 a.m. to 9
a.m., from 12 noon to 1 p.m. and from
4 p.m. to 6 p.m., the draw need not be
opened for the passage of vessels, except
for tugs with tows, if at least three hours
of advance notice is given, and the
reason for passage through the bridges
during a closure period is due to delay
caused by inclement weather or other
emergency or unforeseen circumstances.
Bridge opening data supplied by SHA
revealed a significant decrease in yearly
openings. In the past three years from
2004 to 2006, the bridges opened for
vessels 522, 282 and 157 times,
respectively. Due to the infrequency of
requests for vessel openings of the
drawbridges, SHA requested to change
the current operating regulations by
requiring the draw spans to open on
signal if at least four hours notice is
given year-round by calling the contact
telephone number at (410) 430–7561.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard did not receive any
comments on the NPRM. Therefore, no
changes were made to the final rule.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is amending 33 CFR
117.579, which governs the Main Street
and U.S. 50 Bridges, by revising the
paragraph to read that the draws shall
open on signal if at least four hours
notice is given by calling the telephone
contact number at (410) 430–7461.
Under this revision, there will no longer
be closure periods. All vessels will be
required to provide at least four hours
notice.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
This conclusion is based on the fact
that these changes have only a minimal
impact on maritime traffic transiting the
bridges. Mariners will no longer have to
wait for closure periods to end, which
will allow them to plan their trips
without requiring a stop, so long as the
four hour notice is provided. ′′
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact
the rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
rule relieves restrictions to the
movement of navigation, as mariners
will no longer have to wait for closure
periods to end, which will allow them
to plan their trips without requiring a
stop, so long as the four hour notice is
provided.
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
No assistance was requested from any
small entity.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminates
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Aug 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42307
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
it has been determined that the
promulgation of operating regulations
for drawbridges are categorically
excluded.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
I
2. Revise § 117.579 to read as follows:
§ 117.579
Wicomico River (North Prong).
The draws of the Main Street and U.S.
50 bridges, mile 22.4, Salisbury,
Maryland shall open on signal if at least
four hours notice is given by calling the
telephone contact number at (410) 430–
7461.
Dated: July 24, 2007.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–14936 Filed 8–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. COTP North Carolina CGD05–
07–071]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone for Marine Events; New
River, Jacksonville, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary Safety Zone
during the ‘‘National Night Out’’, an
event to be held August 7, 2007 on the
New River, Jacksonville, North Carolina.
This safety zone is necessary to provide
for the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event. This action is
intended to temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in the New River to accommodate
a Helicopter Search and Rescue
demonstration and a fireworks display.
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 148 (Thursday, August 2, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42306-42307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14936]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD05-07-025]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Wicomico River (North Prong),
Salisbury, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the drawbridge operation
regulations of two Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT)
bridges: The Main Street and U.S. 50 Bridges, at mile 22.4, across
Wicomico River (North Prong) in Salisbury, MD. This final rule will
allow the bridges to open on signal if four hours advance notice is
given and eliminate the continual attendance of draw tender services
while still providing the reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: This rule is effective September 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket CGD05-07-025 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (dpb), Fifth Coast Guard District, Federal
Building, 1st Floor, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA 23704-5004
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Fifth Coast Guard District maintains the public docket
for this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Waverly W. Gregory, Jr., Bridge
Administrator, Fifth Coast Guard District, at (757) 398-6222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
On April 5, 2007, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Wicomico River
(North Prong), Salisbury, MD'' in the Federal Register (72 FR 16752).
We received no comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The State Highway Administration (SHA), a division under MDOT, is
responsible for the operation of both the Main Street and U.S. 50
Bridges, at mile 22.4, across Wicomico River in Salisbury. SHA
requested advance notification for vessel openings and a reduction in
draw tender services due to the infrequency of requests for vessel
openings of the drawbridges.
The Main Street and U.S. 50 Bridges have vertical clearances of
four feet, above mean high water, in the closed-to-navigation position.
The existing operating regulations for these drawbridges are set out in
33 CFR Sec. 117.579, which requires the draws to open on signal,
except from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m., from 12 noon to 1 p.m. and from 4 p.m. to
6 p.m., the draw need not be opened for the passage of vessels, except
for tugs with tows, if at least three hours of advance notice is given,
and the reason for passage through the bridges during a closure period
is due to delay caused by inclement weather or other emergency or
unforeseen circumstances.
Bridge opening data supplied by SHA revealed a significant decrease
in yearly openings. In the past three years from 2004 to 2006, the
bridges opened for vessels 522, 282 and 157 times, respectively. Due to
the infrequency of requests for vessel openings of the drawbridges, SHA
requested to change the current operating regulations by requiring the
draw spans to open on signal if at least four hours notice is given
year-round by calling the contact telephone number at (410) 430-7561.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard did not receive any comments on the NPRM.
Therefore, no changes were made to the final rule.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is amending 33 CFR 117.579, which governs the Main
Street and U.S. 50 Bridges, by revising the paragraph to read that the
draws shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given by
calling the telephone contact number at (410) 430-7461. Under this
revision, there will no longer be closure periods. All vessels will be
required to provide at least four hours notice.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
This conclusion is based on the fact that these changes have only a
minimal impact on maritime traffic transiting the bridges. Mariners
will no longer have to wait for closure periods to end, which will
allow them to plan their trips without requiring a stop, so long as the
four hour notice is provided.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This conclusion is based on the fact the rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
because the rule relieves restrictions to the movement of navigation,
as mariners will no longer have to wait for closure periods to end,
which will allow them to plan their trips without requiring a stop, so
long as the four hour notice is provided.
[[Page 42307]]
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. No
assistance was requested from any small entity.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminates ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation because it has been determined that the promulgation of
operating regulations for drawbridges are categorically excluded.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.579 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.579 Wicomico River (North Prong).
The draws of the Main Street and U.S. 50 bridges, mile 22.4,
Salisbury, Maryland shall open on signal if at least four hours notice
is given by calling the telephone contact number at (410) 430-7461.
Dated: July 24, 2007.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E7-14936 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P