Sunshine Act Meetings, 42067-42068 [07-3760]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Notices
preaccreditation (‘‘Candidacy for
Accreditation’’) of institutions of higher
education and programs within
institutions of higher education
throughout the United States that offer
liberal arts degree(s) at the baccalaureate
level or a documented equivalency.)
3. Midwifery Education Accreditation
Council (Current and requested scope of
recognition: The accreditation and
preaccreditation throughout the United
States of direct-entry midwifery
educational institutions and programs
conferring degrees and certificates,
including the accreditation of such
programs offered via distance
education.)
4. Northwest Commission on Colleges
and Universities (Current scope of
recognition: The accreditation and
preaccreditation (‘‘Candidacy status’’) of
postsecondary educational institutions
in Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Nevada,
Oregon, Utah, and Washington and the
accreditation of such programs offered
via distance education within these
institutions.)
(Requested scope of recognition: The
accreditation and preaccreditation
(‘‘Candidacy status’’) of postsecondary
degree-granting educational institutions
in Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Nevada,
Oregon, Utah, and Washington and the
accreditation of such programs offered
via distance education within these
institutions.)
5. Western Association of Schools and
Colleges, Accrediting Commission for
Community and Junior Colleges
(Current scope of recognition: The
accreditation and preaccreditation
(‘‘Candidate for Accreditation’’) of
community and junior colleges located
in California, Hawaii, the United States
territories of Guam and American
Samoa, the Republic of Palau, the
Federated States of Micronesia, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, and the accreditation
of such programs offered via distance
education at these colleges.)
(Requested scope of recognition: The
accreditation and preaccreditation
(‘‘Candidate for Accreditation’’) of twoyear, Associate degree granting
institutions located in California,
Hawaii, the United States territories of
Guam and American Samoa, the
Republic of Palau, the Federated States
of Micronesia, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, and the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, and
the accreditation of such programs
offered via distance education at these
colleges.)
Interim Reports (An interim report is
a follow-up report on an accrediting
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:12 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
agency’s compliance with specific
criteria for recognition.)
1. Accrediting Council for
Independent Colleges and Schools.
2. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy
Education.
3. American College of NurseMidwives, Division of Accreditation
4. The Council on Chiropractic
Education, Commission on
Accreditation.
5. National Accrediting Commission
of Cosmetology Arts and Sciences.
6. Southern Association of Colleges
and Schools, Commission on Colleges.
Interim Report With a Request for an
Expansion of Scope
1. Joint Review Committee on
Education in Radiologic Technology
(Current scope of recognition: The
accreditation of educational programs in
radiography, including magnetic
resonance, radiation therapy, and
medical dosimetry, at the certificate,
associate, and baccalaureate levels.)
(Requested scope of recognition: The
accreditation of educational programs in
radiography, magnetic resonance,
radiation therapy, and medical
dosimetry, including those offered via
distance education, at the certificate,
associate, and baccalaureate levels.)
State Agency Recognized for the
Approval of Public Postsecondary
Vocational Education
Petition for Renewal of Recognition
1. Puerto Rico State Agency for the
Approval of Public Postsecondary
Vocational, Technical Institutions and
Programs
Federal Agency Seeking DegreeGranting Authority
In accordance with the Federal policy
governing the granting of academic
degrees by Federal agencies (approved
by a letter from the Director, Bureau of
the Budget, to the Secretary, Health,
Education, and Welfare, dated
December 23, 1954), the Secretary is
required to establish a review committee
to advise the Secretary concerning any
legislation that may be proposed that
would authorize the granting of degrees
by a Federal agency. The review
committee forwards its recommendation
concerning a Federal agency’s proposed
degree-granting authority to the
Secretary, who then forwards the
committee’s recommendation and the
Secretary’s recommendation to the
Office of Management and Budget for
review and transmittal to the Congress.
The Secretary uses the Advisory
Committee as the review committee
required for this purpose. Accordingly,
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42067
the Advisory Committee will review the
following institution at this meeting:
Proposed Master’s Degree-Granting
Authority
1. United States Naval Test Pilot
School, Patuxent River, Maryland
(request to award a Master’s of Science
in Flight Test Engineering Degree.)
Where Can I Inspect Petitions and
Third-Party Comments Before and After
the Meeting?
All petitions and those third-party
comments received in advance of the
meeting will be available for public
inspection at the U.S. Department of
Education, Room 7126, MS 8509, 1990
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006,
telephone (202) 219–7011 between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, until November 19,
2007. They will be available again after
the December 17–19, 2007 Advisory
Committee meeting. An appointment
must be made in advance of such
inspection.
How May I Obtain Electronic Access to
This Document?
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
legislation/FedRegister. To use PDF you
must have Adobe Acrobat Reader,
which is available free at this site. If you
have questions about using PDF, call the
U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO),
toll free, at 1–888–293–6498; or in the
Washington, DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
index.html.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2.
Dated: July 26, 2007.
James F. Manning,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Office of
Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. E7–14912 Filed 7–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
United States Election
Assistance Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Public Teleconference
Meetings for the Working
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
42068
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Notices
Subcommittees of the Technical
Guidelines Development Committee.
DATES & TIMES: Tuesday August 6, 2007
at 10:30 a.m. ET. Thursday, August 9,
2007, at 1 a.m. ET. Friday, August 10,
2007 at 11 a.m. ET. Tuesday August 14,
2007 at 10:30 a.m. ET.
STATUS: Audio recordings or working
subcommittee teleconferences are
available upon conclusion of each
meeting at: https://vote.nist.gov/
subcomm_mtgs.htm. Agendas for each
teleconference will be posted
approximately one week in advance of
each meeting at the above Web site.
SUMMARY: The Technical Guidelines
Development Committee (the
‘‘Development Committee’’ was
established to act in the public interest
to assist the Executive Director of the
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
(EAC) in the development of voluntary
voting system guidelines. The
Committee held their first plenary
meeting on July 9, 2004. At this
meeting, the Development Committee
agreed to a resolution forming three
working groups: (1) Human Factors &
Privacy; (2) Security & Transparency;
and (3) Core Requirements & Testing to
gather and analyze information on
relevant issues. These working
subcommittees propose resolutions to
the TGDC on best practices,
specifications and standards.
Specifically, NIST staff and Committee
members will meet via the above
scheduled teleconferences to review and
discuss progress on tasks defined in
resolutions passed at Development
Committee plenary meetings. The
resolutions define technical work tasks
for NIST that will assist the Committee
in developing recommendations for
voluntary voting system guidelines. The
Committee met in its eighth plenary
session on March 22–23, 2007.
Documents and transcriptions of
Committee proceedings are available at:
https://vote.nist.gov/
PublicHearingandMeetings.html.
PURPOSE: At the direction of the
Committee and with technical support
from NIST staff, the three working
subcommittees gather and analyze
information relevant to requirement
recommendations fro the next iteration
of the voluntary voting system
guidelines. The Human Factors and
Privacy Subcommittee considers
usability, accessibility, and privacy
functions of voting systems and the
environment of the polling place. The
Secretary and Transparency
Subcommittee considers the security of
computers, computer networks and
computer data storage used in voting
systems. The Core Requirements and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:12 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Testing Subcommittee considers precise
and testable specifications for voting
systems. The Subcommittees’
recommendations are then presented to
the Development Committee as a whole
at public plenary sessions.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Technical Guidelines Development
Committee (the ‘‘Development
Committee’’) was established pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 15361, to act in the public
interest to assist the Executive Director
of the Election Assistance Commission
in the development of the voluntary
voting system guidelines. The
information gathered and analyzed by
the working subcommittees during their
teleconference meetings will be
reviewed at future Development
Committee plenary meetings.
CONTACT INFORMATION: Allan Eustis,
301–975–5099. If a member of the
public would like to submit written
comments concerning the Committee’s
affairs at any time before or after
subcommittee teleconference meetings,
written comments should be addressed
to the contact person indicated above or
to voting@nist.gov.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance
Commission.
[FR Doc. 07–3760 Filed 7–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–M
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0037; FRL–8141–4]
Pesticide Registration Review; New
Dockets Opened for Review and
Comment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA has established
registration review dockets for the
following pesticides: Fenoxycarb (case
number 7401) and urea sulfate (case
number 7213). With this document, EPA
is opening the public comment period
for these registration reviews.
Registration review is EPA’s periodic
review of pesticide registrations to
ensure that each pesticide continues to
satisfy the statutory standard for
registration, that is, the pesticide can
perform its intended function without
unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. Registration
review dockets contain information that
will assist the public in understanding
the types of information and issues that
the Agency may consider during the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
course of registration reviews. Through
this program, EPA is ensuring that each
pesticide’s registration is based on
current scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health
and the environment.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
identified by the docket identification
(ID) number for the specific pesticide of
interest provided in the table in Unit
III.A., by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.,) 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
the docket ID numbers listed in the table
in Unit III.A. for the pesticides you are
commenting on. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42067-42068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3760]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
Agency: United States Election Assistance Commission.
Action: Notice of Public Teleconference Meetings for the Working
[[Page 42068]]
Subcommittees of the Technical Guidelines Development Committee.
Dates & Times: Tuesday August 6, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. ET. Thursday,
August 9, 2007, at 1 a.m. ET. Friday, August 10, 2007 at 11 a.m. ET.
Tuesday August 14, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. ET.
Status: Audio recordings or working subcommittee teleconferences are
available upon conclusion of each meeting at: https://vote.nist.gov/
subcomm_mtgs.htm. Agendas for each teleconference will be posted
approximately one week in advance of each meeting at the above Web
site.
Summary: The Technical Guidelines Development Committee (the
``Development Committee'' was established to act in the public interest
to assist the Executive Director of the U.S. Election Assistance
Commission (EAC) in the development of voluntary voting system
guidelines. The Committee held their first plenary meeting on July 9,
2004. At this meeting, the Development Committee agreed to a resolution
forming three working groups: (1) Human Factors & Privacy; (2) Security
& Transparency; and (3) Core Requirements & Testing to gather and
analyze information on relevant issues. These working subcommittees
propose resolutions to the TGDC on best practices, specifications and
standards. Specifically, NIST staff and Committee members will meet via
the above scheduled teleconferences to review and discuss progress on
tasks defined in resolutions passed at Development Committee plenary
meetings. The resolutions define technical work tasks for NIST that
will assist the Committee in developing recommendations for voluntary
voting system guidelines. The Committee met in its eighth plenary
session on March 22-23, 2007. Documents and transcriptions of Committee
proceedings are available at: https://vote.nist.gov/
PublicHearingandMeetings.html.
Purpose: At the direction of the Committee and with technical support
from NIST staff, the three working subcommittees gather and analyze
information relevant to requirement recommendations fro the next
iteration of the voluntary voting system guidelines. The Human Factors
and Privacy Subcommittee considers usability, accessibility, and
privacy functions of voting systems and the environment of the polling
place. The Secretary and Transparency Subcommittee considers the
security of computers, computer networks and computer data storage used
in voting systems. The Core Requirements and Testing Subcommittee
considers precise and testable specifications for voting systems. The
Subcommittees' recommendations are then presented to the Development
Committee as a whole at public plenary sessions.
Supplementary Information: The Technical Guidelines Development
Committee (the ``Development Committee'') was established pursuant to
42 U.S.C. 15361, to act in the public interest to assist the Executive
Director of the Election Assistance Commission in the development of
the voluntary voting system guidelines. The information gathered and
analyzed by the working subcommittees during their teleconference
meetings will be reviewed at future Development Committee plenary
meetings.
Contact Information: Allan Eustis, 301-975-5099. If a member of the
public would like to submit written comments concerning the Committee's
affairs at any time before or after subcommittee teleconference
meetings, written comments should be addressed to the contact person
indicated above or to voting@nist.gov.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-3760 Filed 7-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M