Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 707 Airplanes and Model 720 and 720B Series Airplanes, 41958-41963 [07-3712]
Download as PDF
41958
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules
C. Request for Comments
In addition to the areas of interest
noted above, the Board invites
comments from all interested parties on
any aspects it should consider
concerning foreign currency
investments by FCUs and corporates.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on July 26, 2007.
Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7–14849 Filed 7–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28828; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–010–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 707 Airplanes and Model 720
and 720B Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 707 airplanes and Model
720 and 720B series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require
accomplishing an airplane survey to
define the configuration of certain
system installations, and repair of any
discrepancy found. This proposed AD
would also require modifying the fuel
system by installing lightning protection
for the fuel quantity indication system
(FQIS), ground fault relays for the fuel
boost pumps, and additional power
relays for the center tank fuel pumps
and uncommanded on-indication lights
at the flight engineer’s panel. This
proposed AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
certain failures of the fuel pumps or
FQIS, which could result in a potential
ignition source inside the fuel tank,
which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 17,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for the service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathrine Rask, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6505; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2007–28828; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–010–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is located on the
ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
The FAA has examined the
underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large
transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the
service history of airplanes subject to
those regulations, and existing
maintenance practices for fuel tank
systems. As a result of those findings,
we issued a regulation titled ‘‘Transport
Airplane Fuel Tank System Design
Review, Flammability Reduction and
Maintenance and Inspection
Requirements’’ (66 FR 23086, May 7,
2001). In addition to new airworthiness
standards for transport airplanes and
new maintenance requirements, this
rule included Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (‘‘SFAR 88,’’
Amendment 21–78, and subsequent
Amendments 21–82 and 21–83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88
requires certain type design (i.e., type
certificate (TC) and supplemental type
certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate
that their fuel tank systems can prevent
ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This
requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered
transport airplanes and for subsequent
modifications to those airplanes. It
requires them to perform design reviews
and to develop design changes and
maintenance procedures if their designs
do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble
to the rule, we intended to adopt
airworthiness directives to mandate any
changes found necessary to address
unsafe conditions identified as a result
of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we
have established four criteria intended
to define the unsafe conditions
associated with fuel tank systems that
require corrective actions. The
percentage of operating time during
which fuel tanks are exposed to
flammable conditions is one of these
criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation:
single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s),
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
and in-service failure experience. For all
four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken
that may mitigate the need for further
action.
Results from the SFAR 88 analysis
show that potential ignition sources
include:
• Fuel pump electrical failures that
burn through the pump end cap or case.
• Fuel pump electrical failures that
burn through the wire and cause
electrical arcing through the conduit.
• Mechanical failure of center tank
fuel pumps due to uncommanded
operation that causes an ignition source
and an arc in a wing tank due to a latent
in-tank degradation of the fuel quantity
indication system (FQIS) and a lightning
strike.
We have determined that the actions
identified in this AD are necessary to
prevent certain failures of the fuel
pumps or FQIS, which could result in
a potential ignition source inside the
fuel tank, which, in combination with
flammable fuel vapors, could result in
fuel tank explosion and consequent loss
of the airplane.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
modifying the fuel system by installing
lightning protection for the fuel quantity
indication system (FQIS), ground fault
relays for the fuel boost pumps, and
additional power relays for the center
tank fuel pumps and uncommanded onindication lights at the flight engineer’s
panel.
To date, the airframe manufacturer
has not developed service information
for the modifications proposed by this
AD. Due to the age of the subject
airplane models, the operator needs to
conduct an airplane survey to define the
configuration of system installations for
the wing leading edges, wing-to-body
area, electrical equipment bay, flight
deck, and FQIS to facilitate
development of the required service
information. The survey would identify
locations where new components and
wire bundles could be installed, as well
as the configuration of affected systems.
Therefore, to ensure that service
information is available within a
reasonable time to allow modification of
the airplane; this proposed AD would
also require conducting an airplane
survey, and reporting the results to the
FAA. The report would include
photographs and sketches, part numbers
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
of certain components, and the actual
configuration of certain systems.
Due to the age of these airplanes, it is
possible that discrepancies (i.e., wear or
deterioration) might be detected during
the survey. This proposed AD would
also require repair of those
discrepancies.
Ensuring Compliance with Airplane
Survey
Appendix 1 of this proposed AD
contains the 707 SFAR 88 survey areas.
The appendix is for informational use
and provides highlights of the general
content of the required survey to assist
operators in developing an acceptable
survey plan. Operators may wish to use
the appendix as an aid to implement the
airplane survey.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 185 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about 52
airplanes of U.S. registry.
The proposed survey would take
about 20 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour.
Based on these figures, the estimated
cost of the proposed survey for U.S.
operators is $83,200, or $1,600 per
airplane.
Because the manufacturer has not yet
developed a modification
commensurate with the actions
specified by this proposed AD, we
cannot provide specific information
regarding the required number of work
hours or the cost of parts to do the
proposed modification. In addition,
modification costs will likely vary
depending on the operator and the
airplane configuration. The proposed
compliance time of 72 months should
provide ample time for the
development, approval, and installation
of an appropriate modification.
Based on similar modifications
accomplished previously on other
airplane models, however, we can
reasonably estimate that the proposed
modification may require as many as
420 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour.
Required parts may cost up to $185,000
per airplane. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed
modification for U.S. operators is
$11,367,200, or $218,600 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41959
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
41960
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2007–28828;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–010–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by September 17, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model
707–100 long body, –200, –100B long body,
and –100B short body series airplanes; and
Model 707–300, –300B, –300C, and –400
series airplanes; and Model 720 and 720B
series airplanes; certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We
are issuing this AD to prevent certain failures
of the fuel pumps or fuel quantity indication
system (FQIS), which could result in a
potential ignition source inside the fuel tank,
which, in combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in fuel tank explosion
and consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Airplane Survey
(f) Within 12 months after the effective
date of this AD: Conduct an airplane survey
that defines the configuration of system
installations for the wing leading edges,
wing-to-body area, electrical equipment bay,
flight deck, and FQIS using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. If
any discrepancy is detected, repair before
further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. Submit the
survey results to the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356, at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD. The
report must include the survey results (e.g.,
photographs and sketches, part numbers of
FQIS components and fuel pumps, and the
actual configuration of FQIS and the fuel
pump control systems), a description of any
discrepancy found, the airplane serial
number, and the number of landings and
flight hours on the airplane. Under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements contained in this AD and has
assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.
(1) If the survey was done after the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 30 days after the survey.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) If the survey was done before the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD,
‘‘discrepancy’’ is defined as any wear or
deterioration (e.g., damage, fluid leaks,
corrosion, cracking, or system failures) that
might prevent the airplane from being in an
airworthy condition.
Modification of Fuel System
(g) Within 72 months after the effective
date of this AD: Modify the fuel system as
specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and
(g)(3) of this AD, using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
(1) Replace the FQIS wire bundle along the
leading edge of the left and right wings with
a new wire bundle that has a lightning shield
that is separated from other wiring.
(2) Replace each fuel pump relay with a
ground fault interrupter relay.
(3) Install redundant power relays for the
center tank fuel pumps and uncommanded
on-indication lights at the flight engineer’s
panel.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
41961
EP01AU07.005
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
EP01AU07.006
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
41962
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 1, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 18,
2007.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 07–3712 Filed 7–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26710; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–147–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 757 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of comment period.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is revising an earlier
proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Boeing Model 757 airplanes. The
original NPRM would have required
revising the Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) section of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness by
incorporating new limitations for fuel
tank systems to satisfy Special Federal
Aviation Regulation No. 88
requirements. The original NPRM also
would have required the initial
inspection of certain repetitive
inspections specified in the AWLs to
phase-in those inspections, and repair if
necessary. The original NPRM resulted
from a design review of the fuel tank
systems. This action revises the original
NPRM by aligning the compliance time
for revising the AWLs section with the
compliance date of the special
maintenance program requirements,
updating the listing of applicable
airplane maintenance manuals in
Appendix 1, and clarifying certain
actions. We are proposing this
supplemental NPRM to prevent the
potential for ignition sources inside fuel
tanks caused by latent failures,
alterations, repairs, or maintenance
actions, which, in combination with
flammable fuel vapors, could result in a
fuel tank explosion and consequent loss
of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this supplemental NPRM by August 27,
2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:58 Jul 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
supplemental NPRM.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for service
information identified in this proposed
AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathrine Rask, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6505; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this supplemental NPRM.
Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include
the docket number ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2006–26710; Directorate Identifier
2006–NM–147–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this supplemental NPRM. We
will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this
supplemental NPRM in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments submitted,
without change, to https://dms.dot.gov,
including any personal information you
provide. We will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this supplemental NPRM. Using the
search function of that web site, anyone
can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including the name of
the individual who sent the comment
(or signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41963
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78), or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is located on the
ground level of the West Building at the
DOT street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
the Docket Management System receives
them.
Discussion
We proposed to amend 14 CFR part
39 with a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) for an AD (the ‘‘original
NPRM’’) for all Boeing Model 757
airplanes. The original NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
January 3, 2007 (72 FR 50). The original
NPRM proposed to require revising the
Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs)
section of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness by incorporating new
limitations for fuel tank systems to
satisfy Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (SFAR 88)
requirements. The original NPRM also
proposed to require the initial
inspection of certain repetitive
inspections specified in the AWLs to
phase-in those inspections, and repair if
necessary.
Explanation of Change in Compliance
Time
In most ADs, we adopt a compliance
time allowing a specified amount of
time after the AD’s effective date. In this
case, however, we have already issued
regulations that require operators to
revise their maintenance/inspection
programs to address fuel tank safety
issues. The compliance date for these
regulations is December 16, 2008. To
provide for efficient and coordinated
implementation of these regulations and
this supplemental NPRM, we are using
this same compliance date in this
supplemental NPRM, instead of the 18month compliance time recommended
by Boeing. Therefore, we have revised
the compliance time in paragraph (g)
from ‘‘within 18 months after the
effective date of this AD’’ to a
compliance date of ‘‘no later than
December 16, 2008.’’
Comments
We have considered the following
comments on the original NPRM.
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 1, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41958-41963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3712]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-28828; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-010-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 707 Airplanes and Model
720 and 720B Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Boeing Model 707 airplanes and Model 720 and 720B series
airplanes. This proposed AD would require accomplishing an airplane
survey to define the configuration of certain system installations, and
repair of any discrepancy found. This proposed AD would also require
modifying the fuel system by installing lightning protection for the
fuel quantity indication system (FQIS), ground fault relays for the
fuel boost pumps, and additional power relays for the center tank fuel
pumps and uncommanded on-indication lights at the flight engineer's
panel. This proposed AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by
the manufacturer. We are proposing this AD to prevent certain failures
of the fuel pumps or FQIS, which could result in a potential ignition
source inside the fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of
the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 17,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for the service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathrine Rask, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6505; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2007-
28828; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-010-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is located on the
ground floor of the West Building at the street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after the Docket Management System receives them.
Discussion
The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a
regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review,
Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule
included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,''
Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e.,
type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders
to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition
sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for
subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to
perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance
procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to
adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary
to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation: single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s),
[[Page 41959]]
and in-service failure experience. For all four criteria, the
evaluations included consideration of previous actions taken that may
mitigate the need for further action.
Results from the SFAR 88 analysis show that potential ignition
sources include:
Fuel pump electrical failures that burn through the pump
end cap or case.
Fuel pump electrical failures that burn through the wire
and cause electrical arcing through the conduit.
Mechanical failure of center tank fuel pumps due to
uncommanded operation that causes an ignition source and an arc in a
wing tank due to a latent in-tank degradation of the fuel quantity
indication system (FQIS) and a lightning strike.
We have determined that the actions identified in this AD are
necessary to prevent certain failures of the fuel pumps or FQIS, which
could result in a potential ignition source inside the fuel tank,
which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel
tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require modifying the fuel system by installing lightning
protection for the fuel quantity indication system (FQIS), ground fault
relays for the fuel boost pumps, and additional power relays for the
center tank fuel pumps and uncommanded on-indication lights at the
flight engineer's panel.
To date, the airframe manufacturer has not developed service
information for the modifications proposed by this AD. Due to the age
of the subject airplane models, the operator needs to conduct an
airplane survey to define the configuration of system installations for
the wing leading edges, wing-to-body area, electrical equipment bay,
flight deck, and FQIS to facilitate development of the required service
information. The survey would identify locations where new components
and wire bundles could be installed, as well as the configuration of
affected systems.
Therefore, to ensure that service information is available within a
reasonable time to allow modification of the airplane; this proposed AD
would also require conducting an airplane survey, and reporting the
results to the FAA. The report would include photographs and sketches,
part numbers of certain components, and the actual configuration of
certain systems.
Due to the age of these airplanes, it is possible that
discrepancies (i.e., wear or deterioration) might be detected during
the survey. This proposed AD would also require repair of those
discrepancies.
Ensuring Compliance with Airplane Survey
Appendix 1 of this proposed AD contains the 707 SFAR 88 survey
areas. The appendix is for informational use and provides highlights of
the general content of the required survey to assist operators in
developing an acceptable survey plan. Operators may wish to use the
appendix as an aid to implement the airplane survey.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 185 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 52 airplanes of
U.S. registry.
The proposed survey would take about 20 work hours per airplane, at
an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed survey for U.S. operators is $83,200, or
$1,600 per airplane.
Because the manufacturer has not yet developed a modification
commensurate with the actions specified by this proposed AD, we cannot
provide specific information regarding the required number of work
hours or the cost of parts to do the proposed modification. In
addition, modification costs will likely vary depending on the operator
and the airplane configuration. The proposed compliance time of 72
months should provide ample time for the development, approval, and
installation of an appropriate modification.
Based on similar modifications accomplished previously on other
airplane models, however, we can reasonably estimate that the proposed
modification may require as many as 420 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts may cost up to
$185,000 per airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of
the proposed modification for U.S. operators is $11,367,200, or
$218,600 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
[[Page 41960]]
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2007-28828; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
010-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by September
17, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 707-100 long body, -200,
-100B long body, and -100B short body series airplanes; and Model
707-300, -300B, -300C, and -400 series airplanes; and Model 720 and
720B series airplanes; certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to prevent certain failures of
the fuel pumps or fuel quantity indication system (FQIS), which
could result in a potential ignition source inside the fuel tank,
which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in
fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Airplane Survey
(f) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD:
Conduct an airplane survey that defines the configuration of system
installations for the wing leading edges, wing-to-body area,
electrical equipment bay, flight deck, and FQIS using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(h)(1) of this AD. If any discrepancy is detected, repair before
further flight using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. Submit the
survey results to the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356, at
the applicable time specified in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this
AD. The report must include the survey results (e.g., photographs
and sketches, part numbers of FQIS components and fuel pumps, and
the actual configuration of FQIS and the fuel pump control systems),
a description of any discrepancy found, the airplane serial number,
and the number of landings and flight hours on the airplane. Under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the
information collection requirements contained in this AD and has
assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
(1) If the survey was done after the effective date of this AD:
Submit the report within 30 days after the survey.
(2) If the survey was done before the effective date of this AD:
Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, ``discrepancy'' is defined
as any wear or deterioration (e.g., damage, fluid leaks, corrosion,
cracking, or system failures) that might prevent the airplane from
being in an airworthy condition.
Modification of Fuel System
(g) Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify
the fuel system as specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and
(g)(3) of this AD, using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
(1) Replace the FQIS wire bundle along the leading edge of the
left and right wings with a new wire bundle that has a lightning
shield that is separated from other wiring.
(2) Replace each fuel pump relay with a ground fault interrupter
relay.
(3) Install redundant power relays for the center tank fuel
pumps and uncommanded on-indication lights at the flight engineer's
panel.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[[Page 41961]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP01AU07.005
[[Page 41962]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP01AU07.006
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector
[[Page 41963]]
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking
a PI, your local FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 18, 2007.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 07-3712 Filed 7-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P