Regulated Navigation Area; Mississippi River, Eighty-One Mile Point, 41624-41626 [E7-14697]
Download as PDF
41624
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
in domestic and export markets.
Congressional Review Act
The Department has determined that
this action pertains to agency
management, personnel, and
organizations and, accordingly, is not a
‘‘rule’’ as that term is used by the
Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996).
Therefore, the reporting requirement of
5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 0
Authority delegations (Government
agencies), Government employees,
Organization and functions
(Government agencies).
Accordingly, by virtue of the authority
vested in me as Attorney General,
including 5 U.S.C. 301 and 28 U.S.C.
509 and 510, part 0 of title 28 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
I
PART 0—ORGANIZATION OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
1. The authority citation for part 0
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 509,
510, 515–519.
§ 0.15
Deputy Attorney General.
2. Remove and reserve paragraph (h)
of § 0.15.
I
§ 0.19
Associate Attorney General.
3. Remove and reserve paragraph (d)
of § 0.19.
I
Dated: July 25, 2007.
Alberto R. Gonzales,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. E7–14707 Filed 7–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
COAST GUARD
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD08–07–007]
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area;
Mississippi River, Eighty-One Mile
Point
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has
amended the regulated navigation area
(RNA) for the Lower Mississippi River
(LMR) mile marker (MM) 233.9 through
South and South West Passes by
establishing mandatory check-in
procedures for vessels transiting on the
waters of the Mississippi River between
(MM) 167.5 LMR and 187.9 LMR. This
rule is needed to minimize the risk of
collisions, allisions, and groundings
occurring as a result of vessels meeting
unanticipated traffic in the vicinity of
Eighty-One Mile Point, MM 178 LMR.
This rule requires vessels, subject to the
Bridge to Bridge Radiotelephone Act (33
U.S.C. 26), to notify Vessel Traffic
Center Lower Mississippi River, New
Orleans (VTC New Orleans) prior to
entering or getting underway in this
section of the RNA.
DATES: This rule is effective August 30,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being in the docket, are part
of docket [CGD08–07–007] and are
available for inspection or copying at
U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit
Baton Rouge, 6041 Crestmount Drive,
Baton Rouge, LA 70809 between 7:30
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Todd Peterson, Marine
Safety Unit Baton Rouge, at (225) 298–
5400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 5, 2007 we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Regulated Navigation Area;
Mississippi River, Eighty-One Mile
Point in the Federal Register (72 FR 65).
We received no comments on the
proposed rule. No public meetings were
requested and none were held.
Background and Purpose
From 1999 to 2006 there have been 64
reported collisions, allisions, or
groundings on the Lower Mississippi
River between MM 167.5 and 187.9.
There have been 21 allisions, 2 barge
breakaways, 13 collisions and 28
groundings. Of these 64 casualties, 3
were categorized by 46 CFR part 4 as
serious marine incidents and 5 as major
marine casualties. These casualties have
involved all sectors of the maritime
industry including deep draft shipping,
towing vessels, and barge fleets and
have occurred at high, normal and low
water conditions.
A waterways user group
subcommittee of the Lower Mississippi
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
River Waterway Safety Advisory
Committee (LMRWSAC) examined
marine casualties on the LMR in the
vicinity of 81 Mile Point. This
subcommittee consisted of members of
the pilots association, towing vessel
industry, barge fleets and the Coast
Guard. This subcommittee reviewed the
location and marine investigation
associated with each casualty and
subjectively examined river conditions
within this RNA. This committee
determined that existing waterways
management tools may not be sufficient
to safely navigate in the vicinity of 81
Mile Point. Providing position reports to
VTC New Orleans would allow the
Coast Guard to track vessels in this RNA
and provide advice to mariners about
upcoming traffic in an effort to
eliminate meeting and overtaking
scenarios at Eighty-One Mile Point.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
There were no comments received on
this rule change. No public meetings
were requested and none were held.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
This rule does not prohibit vessel
transits, barge fleeting, or towboat
operations within the RNA, but merely
requires checking in with VTS New
Orleans using existing equipment. The
impacts on routine navigation are
expected to be minimal.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule does not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This RNA will not have an impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because this rule will not obstruct the
regular flow of commercial vessel traffic
conducting business within the RNA. It
does not require the purchase of
additional equipment and instead uses
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
existing VHF capabilities already
required by other laws or regulations.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment to Marine
Safety Unit Baton Rouge explaining why
you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would
economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If this
rule affects your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LT Todd
Peterson, Marine Safety Unit Baton
Rouge at (225) 298–5400.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule does not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. It has not been designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it
does not require a Statement of Energy
Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41625
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have determined that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, we believe that this rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction,
from further environmental
documentation. This rule fits in
paragraph (34)(g) because it is a
regulated navigation area. A preliminary
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 165.810 by adding
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
I
§ 165.810 Mississippi River, LA-regulated
navigation area.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Movement of vessels in the vicinity
of Eighty-One Mile Point, Geary LA mm
167.5–187.9 LMR. (1) Prior to
proceeding upriver past MM 167.5,
LMR, Sunshine Bridge, vessels shall
contact Vessel Traffic Center (VTC) New
Orleans on VHF Channel 63A to checkin. Vessels must provide name,
destination, confirm proper operation of
their automated identification system
(AIS) if required under 33 CFR 164.46
and, if applicable, size of tow and
number of loaded and empty barges. At
MM 173.7, LMR, Bringier Point Light,
ascending vessels shall contact VTC
New Orleans and provide a follow-on
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
41626
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
position check. At both check-in and
follow-on position check, VTC New
Orleans will advise the vessel on traffic
approaching Eighty-One Mile Point.
(2) Prior to proceeding downriver past
MM 187.9, LMR, COS-MAR Lights,
vessels shall contact Vessel Traffic
Center (VTC) New Orleans on VHF
Channel 63A to check-in. Vessels must
provide name, destination, confirm
proper operation of their automated
identification system (AIS) if required
under 33 CFR 164.46 and, if applicable,
size of tow and number of loaded and
empty barges. At MM 183.9 LMR,
Wyandotte Chemical Dock Lights,
descending vessels shall contact VTC
New Orleans and provide a follow-on
position check. At both check-in and
follow-on position check VTC New
Orleans will advise the vessel on traffic
approaching Eighty-One Mile Point.
(3) All vessels getting underway
between miles 167.5 and 187.9 must
check-in with VTC New Orleans on
VHF Channel 63A immediately prior to
getting underway and must comply with
the respective ascending and
descending check-in and follow-on
points listed in paragraphs (g)(1) and
(g)(2) above.
(4) Fleet vessels must check-in with
VTC New Orleans if they leave their
respective fleet or if they move into the
main channel. Fleet vessels are not
required to check-in if they are
operating exclusively within their fleet.
Dated: July 16, 2007.
J.R. Whitehead,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–14697 Filed 7–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[Docket No. EPA–R02–OAR–2006–0162,
FRL–8444–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Implementation
Plan Revision; State of New Jersey
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency is approving a request from the
State of New Jersey to revise its State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone to
incorporate state-adopted amendments
to Subchapter 19 ‘‘Control and
Prohibition of Air Pollution from Oxides
of Nitrogen’’ and related amendments to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
Subchapter 16 ‘‘Control and Prohibition
of Air Pollution by Volatile Organic
Compounds.’’ The amendments relate to
the control of oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
emissions from stationary industrial
sources. This SIP revision consists of
control measures needed to meet the
shortfall in emission reductions in New
Jersey’s 1-hour ozone attainment
demonstration SIP as identified by EPA.
The intended effect of this action is to
approve the state control strategy, which
will result in emission reductions that
will help achieve attainment of the
national ambient air quality standards
for ozone required by the Clean Air Act
(the Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be
effective August 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS)
which replaces the Regional Materials
in EDOCKET (RME) docket system. The
new FDMS is located at https://
www.regulations.gov and the docket ID
for this action is EPA–R02–OAR–2006–
0162. All documents in the docket are
listed in the FDMS index. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in FDMS or in hard
copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs
Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New
York, New York 10007–1866. Copies of
the documents relevant to this action
are also available for public inspection
during normal business hours, by
appointment at the Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC; and the New
Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection, Office of Energy, Bureau of
Air Quality Planning, 401 East State
Street, CN027, Trenton, New Jersey
08625.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony (Ted) Gardella,
Gardella.anthony@epa.gov, Air
Programs Branch, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007–
1866, (212) 637–3892.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
detailed information and EPA’s analysis
of New Jersey’s revision to its State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone see
EPA’s proposed rulemaking action (72
FR 11812, March 14, 2007) which can
be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov.
The following table of contents
describes the format for this notice.
Table of Contents
I. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. What Comments Were Received and How
Has EPA Responded to Them?
III. What Role Does This Rule Play in the
Ozone SIP?
IV. What Are EPA’s Conclusions?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
New Jersey submitted a revision to the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
ozone dated December 16, 2005, for EPA
approval, that includes a new rule and
amendments to Subchapter 19 ‘‘Control
and Prohibition of Air Pollution from
Oxides of Nitrogen’’; Subchapter 16
‘‘Control and Prohibition of Air
Pollution by Volatile Organic
Compounds’’; Subchapter 8 ‘‘Permits
and Certificates for Minor Facilities (and
Major Facilities Without an Operating
Permit)’’; and Subchapter 22 ‘‘Operating
Permits.’’
Except for certain Open Market
Emissions Trading (OMET) Program
provisions in Subchapters 8, 16, and 19,
and compliance dates beyond November
15, 2007 for repowering and innovative
control technology, EPA is approving, as
revisions to the New Jersey ozone SIP,
the state-adopted amendments to
Subchapter 19 and Subchapter 16, each
adopted by New Jersey on September 8,
2005, and submitted to EPA on
December 16, 2005. EPA is currently
reviewing past amendments to
Subchapter 8 and will address the
approvability of all Subchapter 8
amendments at the same time in a
future action. Subchapter 22 is New
Jersey’s operating permit rule that was
separately approved under title V of the
Clean Air Act and therefore Subchapter
22 should not have been submitted as a
SIP revision. EPA has reviewed the new
amendments to Subchapter 22 and will
formally respond to New Jersey with a
letter.
New Jersey amended Subchapter 19 to
reduce emissions of NOX in response to
emission reduction shortfalls, identified
by EPA (64 FR 70380, December 16,
1999), for attainment of New Jersey’s 1hour ozone standard. New Jersey
amended Subchapter 16 to be consistent
with amendments to Subchapter 19.
Except for certain OMET provisions in
Subchapters 8, 16, and 19, and
compliance dates beyond November 15,
2007 for repowering and innovative
control technology, New Jersey’s stateadopted Subchapters 16 and 19 are fully
approvable as a SIP-strengthening
measure for New Jersey’s ground level
ozone SIP. The amendments to
Subchapters 16 and 19 in New Jersey’s
submittal to EPA meet New Jersey’s
commitment by adopting control
measures for additional emission
reductions to attain the 1-hour ozone
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 146 (Tuesday, July 31, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41624-41626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14697]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
COAST GUARD
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD08-07-007]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Mississippi River, Eighty-One Mile
Point
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has amended the regulated navigation area
(RNA) for the Lower Mississippi River (LMR) mile marker (MM) 233.9
through South and South West Passes by establishing mandatory check-in
procedures for vessels transiting on the waters of the Mississippi
River between (MM) 167.5 LMR and 187.9 LMR. This rule is needed to
minimize the risk of collisions, allisions, and groundings occurring as
a result of vessels meeting unanticipated traffic in the vicinity of
Eighty-One Mile Point, MM 178 LMR. This rule requires vessels, subject
to the Bridge to Bridge Radiotelephone Act (33 U.S.C. 26), to notify
Vessel Traffic Center Lower Mississippi River, New Orleans (VTC New
Orleans) prior to entering or getting underway in this section of the
RNA.
DATES: This rule is effective August 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being in the docket,
are part of docket [CGD08-07-007] and are available for inspection or
copying at U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Baton Rouge, 6041
Crestmount Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70809 between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Todd Peterson, Marine
Safety Unit Baton Rouge, at (225) 298-5400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 5, 2007 we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Regulated Navigation Area; Mississippi River, Eighty-
One Mile Point in the Federal Register (72 FR 65). We received no
comments on the proposed rule. No public meetings were requested and
none were held.
Background and Purpose
From 1999 to 2006 there have been 64 reported collisions,
allisions, or groundings on the Lower Mississippi River between MM
167.5 and 187.9. There have been 21 allisions, 2 barge breakaways, 13
collisions and 28 groundings. Of these 64 casualties, 3 were
categorized by 46 CFR part 4 as serious marine incidents and 5 as major
marine casualties. These casualties have involved all sectors of the
maritime industry including deep draft shipping, towing vessels, and
barge fleets and have occurred at high, normal and low water
conditions.
A waterways user group subcommittee of the Lower Mississippi River
Waterway Safety Advisory Committee (LMRWSAC) examined marine casualties
on the LMR in the vicinity of 81 Mile Point. This subcommittee
consisted of members of the pilots association, towing vessel industry,
barge fleets and the Coast Guard. This subcommittee reviewed the
location and marine investigation associated with each casualty and
subjectively examined river conditions within this RNA. This committee
determined that existing waterways management tools may not be
sufficient to safely navigate in the vicinity of 81 Mile Point.
Providing position reports to VTC New Orleans would allow the Coast
Guard to track vessels in this RNA and provide advice to mariners about
upcoming traffic in an effort to eliminate meeting and overtaking
scenarios at Eighty-One Mile Point.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
There were no comments received on this rule change. No public
meetings were requested and none were held.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
This rule does not prohibit vessel transits, barge fleeting, or
towboat operations within the RNA, but merely requires checking in with
VTS New Orleans using existing equipment. The impacts on routine
navigation are expected to be minimal.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule does
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This RNA will not have an impact on a substantial number of
small entities because this rule will not obstruct the regular flow of
commercial vessel traffic conducting business within the RNA. It does
not require the purchase of additional equipment and instead uses
[[Page 41625]]
existing VHF capabilities already required by other laws or
regulations.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment to Marine
Safety Unit Baton Rouge explaining why you think it qualifies and how
and to what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If this rule
affects your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LT Todd Peterson, Marine Safety Unit Baton
Rouge at (225) 298-5400.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule does not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, we believe that this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule fits in paragraph (34)(g)
because it is a regulated navigation area. A preliminary
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 165.810 by adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 165.810 Mississippi River, LA-regulated navigation area.
* * * * *
(g) Movement of vessels in the vicinity of Eighty-One Mile Point,
Geary LA mm 167.5-187.9 LMR. (1) Prior to proceeding upriver past MM
167.5, LMR, Sunshine Bridge, vessels shall contact Vessel Traffic
Center (VTC) New Orleans on VHF Channel 63A to check-in. Vessels must
provide name, destination, confirm proper operation of their automated
identification system (AIS) if required under 33 CFR 164.46 and, if
applicable, size of tow and number of loaded and empty barges. At MM
173.7, LMR, Bringier Point Light, ascending vessels shall contact VTC
New Orleans and provide a follow-on
[[Page 41626]]
position check. At both check-in and follow-on position check, VTC New
Orleans will advise the vessel on traffic approaching Eighty-One Mile
Point.
(2) Prior to proceeding downriver past MM 187.9, LMR, COS-MAR
Lights, vessels shall contact Vessel Traffic Center (VTC) New Orleans
on VHF Channel 63A to check-in. Vessels must provide name, destination,
confirm proper operation of their automated identification system (AIS)
if required under 33 CFR 164.46 and, if applicable, size of tow and
number of loaded and empty barges. At MM 183.9 LMR, Wyandotte Chemical
Dock Lights, descending vessels shall contact VTC New Orleans and
provide a follow-on position check. At both check-in and follow-on
position check VTC New Orleans will advise the vessel on traffic
approaching Eighty-One Mile Point.
(3) All vessels getting underway between miles 167.5 and 187.9 must
check-in with VTC New Orleans on VHF Channel 63A immediately prior to
getting underway and must comply with the respective ascending and
descending check-in and follow-on points listed in paragraphs (g)(1)
and (g)(2) above.
(4) Fleet vessels must check-in with VTC New Orleans if they leave
their respective fleet or if they move into the main channel. Fleet
vessels are not required to check-in if they are operating exclusively
within their fleet.
Dated: July 16, 2007.
J.R. Whitehead,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7-14697 Filed 7-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P