Diversification Requirements for Variable Annuity, Endowment, and Life Insurance Contracts, 41651-41654 [E7-14620]
Download as PDF
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Proposed Rules
• How can we best take advantage of
clinical information captured
electronically using standardized codes
to specify the nature of the impairment?
• What do you think about our idea
of a more extensive and specific list of
impairments based on established
diagnoses?
• What should the general criteria for
inclusion on such a list be?
• What specific impairment(s) or
kinds of impairments do you believe we
should include on such a list, and what
specific criteria for inclusion should we
use for those impairments (including
specific standardized codes if
appropriate)?
• How should the rules or procedures
for such a list be structured; for
example, should we include a list of all
of the diagnoses in the regulations, or
should we have the list on SSA’s
Internet site or somewhere else?
• What sources should we consult to
create such a list; for example, our
Listing of Impairments, the latest
edition of the World Health
Organization’s International
Classification of Diseases (ICD), and the
latest edition of the American
Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM)? Are there individuals and
organizations we should also be
consulting?
• How should we keep the list up to
date?
• We intend to undertake special
outreach efforts in order to encourage
public discussion regarding potential
methods and standards for identifying
compassionate allowances, including
periodic quarterly hearings. What
methods should we use for community
outreach, and where should the
outreach take place?
We will not respond directly to
comments you send us because of this
notice. After we consider your
comments in response to this notice, we
will decide whether and how to revise
the rules we use to determine disability.
If we propose specific revisions to the
rules, we will publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register. In accordance with the
usual rulemaking procedures we follow,
you will have a chance to comment on
the revisions we propose when we
publish the NPRM, and we will
summarize and respond to the
significant comments on the NPRM in
the preamble to any final rules.
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and
procedure, Blind, Disability benefits,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
Old-Age, Survivors and Disability
Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Social Security.
20 CFR Part 405
Administrative practice and
procedure; Blind, Disability benefits;
Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability
Insurance, Public assistance programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Social Security,
Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
benefits, Public assistance programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Supplemental Security
Income (SSI).
Dated: July 24, 2007.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. E7–14686 Filed 7–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–118719–07]
RIN 1545–BG65
Diversification Requirements for
Variable Annuity, Endowment, and Life
Insurance Contracts
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document proposes
changes to the regulations concerning
the diversification requirements of
section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). The proposed changes
would expand the list of holders whose
beneficial interests in an investment
company, partnership, or trust do not
prevent a segregated asset account from
looking through to the assets of the
investment company, partnership, or
trust, to satisfy the requirements of
section 817(h). The proposed
regulations also would remove the
sentence in § 1.817–5(a)(2) that provides
that the payment required to remedy an
inadvertent diversification failure must
be based on the tax that would have
been owed by the policyholders if they
were treated as receiving the income on
the contract. These proposed regulations
would affect insurance companies that
issue variable contracts and would
affect policyholders who purchase such
contracts.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41651
Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by October 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–118719–07), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be hand
delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–118719–07),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC, or sent
electronically, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov/ (IRS REG–
118719–07).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
James Polfer, at (202) 622–3970 (not a
toll-free number). Concerning
submissions of comments, the hearing,
and/or to be placed on the building
access list to attend the hearing, e-mail
Richard A. Hurst@irscousel.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
Section 817(d) defines a variable
contract for purposes of part I of
subchapter L of the Code (sections 801–
818). For a contract to be a variable
contract, it must provide for the
allocation of all or a part of the amounts
received under the contract to an
account that, pursuant to state law or
regulation, is segregated from the
general asset accounts of the issuing
insurance company. In addition, for a
life insurance contract to be a variable
contract, it must qualify as a life
insurance contract for Federal income
tax purposes, and the amount of the
death benefits (or the period of
coverage) must be adjusted on the basis
of the investment return and the market
value of the segregated asset account; for
an annuity contract to be a variable
contract, it must provide for the
payment of annuities, and the amounts
paid in, or the amount paid out, must
reflect the investment return and the
market value of the segregated asset
account; for a contract that provides
funding of insurance on retired lives to
be a variable contract, the amounts paid
in, or the amounts paid out, must reflect
the investment return and the market
value of the segregated asset account.
Section 817(h)(1) provides that a
variable contract that is based on a
segregated asset account is not treated as
an annuity, endowment, or life
insurance contract unless the segregated
asset account is adequately diversified
in accordance with regulations
prescribed by the Secretary. If a
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
41652
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Proposed Rules
segregated asset account is not
adequately diversified for a calendar
quarter, then the contracts supported by
that segregated asset account are not
treated as annuity, endowment, or life
insurance contracts for that period and
subsequent periods, even if the
segregated asset account is adequately
diversified in those subsequent periods.
Under § 1.817–5(a), if a segregated asset
account is not adequately diversified,
income earned by that segregated asset
account is treated as ordinary income
received or accrued by the
policyholders. Section 1.817–5(a)(2)
provides conditions an issuer of a
variable contract must satisfy in order to
correct an inadvertent failure to
diversify. Rev. Proc. 92–25, 1992–1 CB
741, see § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter,
sets forth in more detail the procedure
by which an issuer may request the
relief described in § 1.817–5(a)(2).
Congress enacted the diversification
requirements of section 817(h) to
‘‘discourage the use of tax-preferred
variable annuity and variable life
insurance primarily as investment
vehicles.’’ H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 98–861,
at 1055 (1984). In section 817(h)(1),
Congress granted the Secretary broad
regulatory authority to develop rules to
carry out this intent. Congress directed
that these standards be imposed because
‘‘by limiting a customer’s ability to
select specific investments underlying a
variable contract, [adequate
diversification] will help ensure that a
customer’s primary motivation in
purchasing the contract is more likely to
be the traditional economic protections
provided by annuities and life
insurance.’’ S. Prt. 98–169, Vol. I at 546
(1984). A primary directive from
Congress to Treasury in enacting the
standards was to ‘‘deny annuity or life
insurance treatment for investments that
are publicly available to investors.’’ H.R.
Conf. Rep. No. 98–861, at 1055 (1984).
Section 817(h)(4) provides a lookthrough rule under which taxpayers do
not treat the interest in a regulated
investment company (RIC) or trust as a
single asset of the segregated asset
account but rather apply the
diversification tests by taking into
account the assets of the RIC or trust.
Section 817(h) further provides that the
look-through rule applies only if all of
the beneficial interests in a RIC or trust
are held by one or more insurance
companies (or affiliated companies) in
their general account or segregated asset
accounts, or by fund managers (or
affiliated companies) in connection with
the creation or management of the RIC
or trust.
Under § 1.817–5(f)(1), if look-through
treatment is available, a beneficial
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
interest in a RIC, real estate investment
trust, partnership, or trust that is treated
under sections 671 through 679 as
owned by the grantor or another person
(‘‘investment company, partnership or
trust’’) is not treated as a single
investment of a segregated asset account
for purposes of testing diversification.
Instead, a pro rata portion of each asset
of the investment company, partnership,
or trust is treated as an asset of the
segregated asset account. Section 1.817–
5(f)(2)(i) provides that the look-through
rule applies to any investment
company, partnership, or trust if (1) All
the beneficial interests in the
investment company, partnership, or
trust are held by one or more segregated
asset accounts of one or more insurance
companies; and (2) public access to the
investment company, partnership, or
trust is available exclusively through the
purchase of a variable contract (except
as otherwise permitted in § 1.817–
5(f)(3)).
Under § 1.817–5(f)(3), look-through
treatment is not prevented by reason of
beneficial interests in an investment
company, partnership, or trust that are:
(1) Held by the general account of a
life insurance company or a corporation
related to a life insurance company, but
only if the return on such interests is
computed in the same manner as the
return on an interest held by a
segregated asset account is computed,
there is no intent to sell such interests
to the public, and a segregated asset
account of such life insurance company
also holds or will hold a beneficial
interest in the investment company,
partnership, or trust;
(2) Held by the manager, or a
corporation related to the manager, of
the investment company, partnership or
trust, but only if the holding of the
interests is in connection with the
creation or management of the
investment company, partnership or
trust, the return on such interest is
computed in the same manner as the
return on an interest held by a
segregated asset account is computed,
and there is no intent to sell such
interests to the public;
(3) Held by the trustee of a qualified
pension or retirement plan; or
(4) Held by the public, or treated as
owned by the policyholders pursuant to
Rev. Rul. 81–225, see § 601.601(d)(2) of
this chapter, but only if (A) the
investment company, partnership or
trust was closed to the public in
accordance with Rev. Rul. 82–55, 1982–
1 CB 12, see § 601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter, or (B) all the assets of the
segregated asset account are attributable
to premium payments made by
policyholders before September 26,
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1981, to premium payments made in
connection with a qualified pension or
retirement plan, or to any combination
of such premium payments.
Explanation of Provisions
This document contains proposed
amendments to 26 CFR part 1 under
section 817(h).
The amendments would remove the
sentence from § 1.817–5(a)(2) which
provides that the amount required to be
paid to remedy an inadvertent failure to
diversify must be based on the tax that
would have been owed by the
policyholders if they were treated as
receiving the income on the contract for
the period or periods of
nondiversification.
The amendments also would expand
the list of permitted investors in
§ 1.817–5(f)(3) to include (i) Qualified
tuition programs as defined in section
529, (ii) trustees of foreign pension
plans established and maintained
outside the United States, primarily for
the benefit of individuals, substantially
all of whom are nonresident aliens, and
(iii) accounts that, pursuant to Puerto
Rican law or regulation, are segregated
from the general asset accounts of the
life insurance companies that own the
accounts, provided the requirements of
section 817(d) and (h) are satisfied
(without regard to the requirement the
accounts be segregated pursuant to
‘‘State’’ law or regulation).
Reasons for Change
1. Proposed Amendment to § 1.817–
5(a)(2) (Remedy for Inadvertent
Nondiversification
The proposed regulations would
remove the sentence in § 1.817–5(a)(2)
that provides that the payment required
to remedy an inadvertent diversification
failure must be based on the tax that
would have been owed by the
policyholders if they were treated as
receiving the income on the contract. In
Notice 2007–15, 2007–7 I.R.B. 503
(February 12, 2007), the IRS requested
comments on how various correction
procedures, including those described
in § 1.817–5(a)(2) and Rev. Proc. 92–25,
may be improved. Section 5.03(e) and (f)
of the Notice specifically requested
comments on the computation of the
amounts required to be paid under these
correction procedures. Moreover, in the
past, the provision in § 1.817–5(a)(2) of
the amount required to be paid has
caused confusion about the scope of the
IRS’s authority to provide for amounts
that depart from the plain language of
the regulation. See, for example, Notice
2000–9, 2000–1 C.B. 449 (reduced
amount applied for a limited period of
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
time in the case of failures due to
investments in U.S. Treasury securities).
See § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter.
Even with the proposed modification
of § 1.817–5(a)(2), the amount required
to be paid to remedy an inadvertent
failure to diversify remains the amount
set forth in Rev. Proc. 92–25, section
4.02. The modification of § 1.817–5(a)(2)
will preserve flexibility, however,
should the IRS choose to modify this
amount by publication in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin in response to
comments on Notice 2007–15.
2. Expansion of List of Permitted
Investors Under § 1.817–5(f)(3)
On July 30, 2003, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–
163974–02, 2003–2 CB 595) under
section 817 in the Federal Register (68
FR 44689), proposing to remove a
specific rule that applied to
nonregistered partnerships for purposes
of testing diversification. Written
comments were received both on the
proposed regulations and on the need
for further guidance under section 817
more generally. Comments on the
proposed regulations were taken into
account in final regulations (T.D. 9185,
2005–1 CB 752) that were published
March 1, 2005 in the Federal Register
(70 FR 9869). Comments on section 817
more generally covered a broad range of
issues. Two of those issues have since
been addressed by revenue ruling. See
Rev. Rul. 2005–7, 2005–1 CB 464
(concerning application of the lookthrough rule in the case of tiered
regulated investment companies); Rev.
Rul. 2007–7, 2007–7 I.R.B. 468
(February 12, 2007) (concluding that an
interest held by a permitted investor is
not treated as an interest held by the
general public for purposes of Rev. Rul.
2003–92, 2003–2 CB 350).
These proposed regulations would
expand the list of permitted investors in
§ 1.817–5(f)(3) to include two categories
of holders that were the subject of
comments in 2003: (i) Qualified tuition
programs as defined in section 529, and
(ii) trustees of pension or retirement
plans established and maintained
outside of the United States primarily
for the benefit of individuals
substantially all of whom are
nonresident aliens.
Section 529 provides for the
exemption from Federal income tax of
qualified tuition programs. The term
‘‘qualified tuition program’’ means a
program established and maintained by
a state or agency or instrumentality
thereof or by one or more eligible
educational institutions (A) Under
which a person (i) May purchase tuition
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
credits or certificates on behalf of a
designated beneficiary which entitle the
beneficiary to the waiver or payment of
qualified higher education expenses of
the beneficiary, or (ii) in the case of a
program established and maintained by
a State or agency or instrumentality
thereof, may make contributions to an
account which is established for the
purpose of meeting the qualified higher
education expenses of the designated
beneficiary of the account, and (B)
which meets the other requirements of
section 529(b).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
agree with the 2003 commentators that
permitting qualified tuition programs
and certain trustees of foreign pension
plans to own a beneficial interest in an
investment company, partnership, or
trust that is also owned by one or more
segregated asset accounts would be
consistent with the purpose and
operation of section 817(h). In addition,
neither qualified tuition programs nor
the foreign pension plans that are
described in the proposed regulations
present the possibility of investment by
the general public, as that term is used
in Rev. Rul. 81–225, 1981–2 CB 12, and
Rev. Rul. 2003–92. See also Rev. Rul.
2007–7. The inclusion of qualified
tuition programs in the list of permitted
investors in § 1.817–5(f)(3) does not
relieve those programs of the need to
satisfy all requirements of section 529
and the regulations under that section.
In particular, the inclusion of such
programs does not imply that an
investment in a single investment
company, partnership, or trust satisfying
the minimum diversification
requirements of § 1.817–5(b) would
necessarily be treated as a permitted
investment under section 529, whether
as a ‘‘broad-based investment strategy’’
within the meaning of Notice 2001–55,
2001–2 C.B. 299 or otherwise. The
Treasury Department and the IRS will
continue to evaluate other comments
received in this area for future guidance
by publication in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin.
Finally, the proposed regulations
would expand the list of permitted
investors in § 1.817–5(f)(3) to include
investment by an account which,
pursuant to Puerto Rican law or
regulation, is segregated from the
general asset accounts of the life
insurance company that owns the
account, provided the requirements of
section 817(d) and (h) are satisfied
(without regard to the requirement that
the account be segregated pursuant to
‘‘State’’ law or regulation). The Treasury
Department and the IRS have received
a number of requests for guidance
interpreting the term ‘‘variable contract’’
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41653
to include a contract issued by a Puerto
Rican company, based on accounts that
are segregated under Puerto Rican law
or regulation. One reason for these
requests is to ensure that a beneficial
interest held by a Puerto Rican company
in an investment company, partnership,
or trust does not prevent look-through
treatment for the other holders of an
interest in the same investment,
company, partnership, or trust under
§ 1.817–5(f)(2). The Treasury
Department and the IRS believe that
expanding the list of permitted investors
as proposed would address this issue
without implicating the interpretive
question of what constitutes a ‘‘State’’
within the meaning of sections 817(d)
and 7701(a)(10).
Proposed Effective Date
The Treasury Department and the IRS
intend these regulations to be effective
on the date the final regulations are
published in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations, and because the
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking
will be submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on their
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are
timely submitted to the IRS. In addition
to comments on the proposed
regulations more generally, the Treasury
Department and the IRS specifically
request comments on (i) the clarity of
the proposed regulations and how they
can be made easier to understand; and
(ii) whether rules similar to those
proposed to apply to accounts that are
segregated pursuant to Puerto Rican law
or regulation should apply to accounts
that are segregated pursuant to the laws
or regulations of other territories.
All comments will be available for
public inspection and copying. A public
hearing may be scheduled if requested
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
41654
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Proposed Rules
in writing by any person that timely
submits written or electronic comments.
If a public hearing is scheduled, notice
of the date, time, and place for the
hearing will be published in the Federal
Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
proposed regulations is James Polfer,
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions and Products),
Internal Revenue Service. However,
personnel from other offices of the
Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in their development.
account, provided the requirements of
section 817(d) and (h) are satisfied.
Solely for purposes of this paragraph
(f)(3)(vi), the requirement under section
817(d)(1) that the account be segregated
pursuant to State law or regulation shall
be disregarded; or
*
*
*
*
*
Kevin M. Brown,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7–14620 Filed 7–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
33 CFR Part 334
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
Naval Restricted Area, Port Townsend,
Indian Island, Walan Point, WA
AGENCY:
PART 1—INCOME TAX
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by adding an entry
in numerical order to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.817–5 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 817(h). * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.817–5 is amended as
follows:
1. The last sentence of paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) is removed.
2. Paragraph (f)(3)(iii) is revised.
3. Paragraph (f)(3)(iv) is redesignated
as paragraph (f)(3)(vii).
4. New paragraphs (f)(3)(iv) through
(vi) are added.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 1.817–5 Diversification requirements for
variable annuity, endowment, and life
insurance contracts.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Held by the trustee of a qualified
pension or retirement plan;
(iv) Held by a qualified tuition
program as defined in section 529;
(v) Held by the trustee of a pension
plan established and maintained outside
of the United States, as defined in
section 7701(a)(9), primarily for the
benefit of individuals substantially all of
whom are nonresident aliens, as defined
in section 7701(b)(1)(B);
(vi) Held by an account which,
pursuant to Puerto Rican law or
regulation, is segregated from the
general asset accounts of the life
insurance company that owns the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Jul 30, 2007
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
Jkt 211001
Notice of proposed rulemaking
and request for comments.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) is proposing to amend
its regulations for the restricted area
established in the waters of Port
Townsend Bay off Puget Sound adjacent
to Naval Magazine Indian Island,
Jefferson County, Washington. The
amendments will enable the affected
units of the United States military to
enhance safety and security around an
active military establishment. The
regulations are necessary to safeguard
military vessels and United States
government facilities from sabotage and
other subversive acts, accidents, or
incidents of similar nature. The
regulations are also necessary to protect
the public from potentially hazardous
conditions that may exist as a result of
military use of the area.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number COE–
2007–0020, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail:
david.b.olson@usace.army.mil. Include
the docket number COE–2007–0020 in
the subject line of the message.
Mail: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Attn: CECW–CO (David B. Olson), 441
G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20314–
1000.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to
security requirements, we cannot
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
receive comments by hand delivery or
courier.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket number COE–2007–0020. All
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the commenter indicates that the
comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
not submit information that you
consider to be CBI, or otherwise
protected, through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov Web site is an
anonymous access system, which means
we will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide
it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail directly to the Corps
without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, we recommend that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If we cannot read your
comment because of technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, we may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic
comments should avoid the use of any
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed. Although listed in
the index, some information is not
publicly available, such as CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form.
Consideration will be given to all
comments received within 30 days of
the date of publication of this notice.
Mr.
David Olson, Headquarters, Operations
and Regulatory Community of Practice,
Washington, DC at 202–761–4922; Ms.
Michelle Walker, Regulatory Branch
Chief, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Seattle District, Northwest Division, at
206–764–6915; or Ms. Koko Ekendiz of
the Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\31JYP1.SGM
31JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 146 (Tuesday, July 31, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41651-41654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14620]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-118719-07]
RIN 1545-BG65
Diversification Requirements for Variable Annuity, Endowment, and
Life Insurance Contracts
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes changes to the regulations concerning
the diversification requirements of section 817(h) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). The proposed changes would expand the list of
holders whose beneficial interests in an investment company,
partnership, or trust do not prevent a segregated asset account from
looking through to the assets of the investment company, partnership,
or trust, to satisfy the requirements of section 817(h). The proposed
regulations also would remove the sentence in Sec. 1.817-5(a)(2) that
provides that the payment required to remedy an inadvertent
diversification failure must be based on the tax that would have been
owed by the policyholders if they were treated as receiving the income
on the contract. These proposed regulations would affect insurance
companies that issue variable contracts and would affect policyholders
who purchase such contracts.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by October 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-118719-07), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
118719-07), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, or sent electronically, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov/ (IRS REG-118719-07).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
James Polfer, at (202) 622-3970 (not a toll-free number). Concerning
submissions of comments, the hearing, and/or to be placed on the
building access list to attend the hearing, e-mail Richard A.
Hurst@irscousel.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 817(d) defines a variable contract for purposes of part I
of subchapter L of the Code (sections 801-818). For a contract to be a
variable contract, it must provide for the allocation of all or a part
of the amounts received under the contract to an account that, pursuant
to state law or regulation, is segregated from the general asset
accounts of the issuing insurance company. In addition, for a life
insurance contract to be a variable contract, it must qualify as a life
insurance contract for Federal income tax purposes, and the amount of
the death benefits (or the period of coverage) must be adjusted on the
basis of the investment return and the market value of the segregated
asset account; for an annuity contract to be a variable contract, it
must provide for the payment of annuities, and the amounts paid in, or
the amount paid out, must reflect the investment return and the market
value of the segregated asset account; for a contract that provides
funding of insurance on retired lives to be a variable contract, the
amounts paid in, or the amounts paid out, must reflect the investment
return and the market value of the segregated asset account.
Section 817(h)(1) provides that a variable contract that is based
on a segregated asset account is not treated as an annuity, endowment,
or life insurance contract unless the segregated asset account is
adequately diversified in accordance with regulations prescribed by the
Secretary. If a
[[Page 41652]]
segregated asset account is not adequately diversified for a calendar
quarter, then the contracts supported by that segregated asset account
are not treated as annuity, endowment, or life insurance contracts for
that period and subsequent periods, even if the segregated asset
account is adequately diversified in those subsequent periods. Under
Sec. 1.817-5(a), if a segregated asset account is not adequately
diversified, income earned by that segregated asset account is treated
as ordinary income received or accrued by the policyholders. Section
1.817-5(a)(2) provides conditions an issuer of a variable contract must
satisfy in order to correct an inadvertent failure to diversify. Rev.
Proc. 92-25, 1992-1 CB 741, see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter,
sets forth in more detail the procedure by which an issuer may request
the relief described in Sec. 1.817-5(a)(2).
Congress enacted the diversification requirements of section 817(h)
to ``discourage the use of tax-preferred variable annuity and variable
life insurance primarily as investment vehicles.'' H.R. Conf. Rep. No.
98-861, at 1055 (1984). In section 817(h)(1), Congress granted the
Secretary broad regulatory authority to develop rules to carry out this
intent. Congress directed that these standards be imposed because ``by
limiting a customer's ability to select specific investments underlying
a variable contract, [adequate diversification] will help ensure that a
customer's primary motivation in purchasing the contract is more likely
to be the traditional economic protections provided by annuities and
life insurance.'' S. Prt. 98-169, Vol. I at 546 (1984). A primary
directive from Congress to Treasury in enacting the standards was to
``deny annuity or life insurance treatment for investments that are
publicly available to investors.'' H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 98-861, at 1055
(1984).
Section 817(h)(4) provides a look-through rule under which
taxpayers do not treat the interest in a regulated investment company
(RIC) or trust as a single asset of the segregated asset account but
rather apply the diversification tests by taking into account the
assets of the RIC or trust. Section 817(h) further provides that the
look-through rule applies only if all of the beneficial interests in a
RIC or trust are held by one or more insurance companies (or affiliated
companies) in their general account or segregated asset accounts, or by
fund managers (or affiliated companies) in connection with the creation
or management of the RIC or trust.
Under Sec. 1.817-5(f)(1), if look-through treatment is available,
a beneficial interest in a RIC, real estate investment trust,
partnership, or trust that is treated under sections 671 through 679 as
owned by the grantor or another person (``investment company,
partnership or trust'') is not treated as a single investment of a
segregated asset account for purposes of testing diversification.
Instead, a pro rata portion of each asset of the investment company,
partnership, or trust is treated as an asset of the segregated asset
account. Section 1.817-5(f)(2)(i) provides that the look-through rule
applies to any investment company, partnership, or trust if (1) All the
beneficial interests in the investment company, partnership, or trust
are held by one or more segregated asset accounts of one or more
insurance companies; and (2) public access to the investment company,
partnership, or trust is available exclusively through the purchase of
a variable contract (except as otherwise permitted in Sec. 1.817-
5(f)(3)).
Under Sec. 1.817-5(f)(3), look-through treatment is not prevented
by reason of beneficial interests in an investment company,
partnership, or trust that are:
(1) Held by the general account of a life insurance company or a
corporation related to a life insurance company, but only if the return
on such interests is computed in the same manner as the return on an
interest held by a segregated asset account is computed, there is no
intent to sell such interests to the public, and a segregated asset
account of such life insurance company also holds or will hold a
beneficial interest in the investment company, partnership, or trust;
(2) Held by the manager, or a corporation related to the manager,
of the investment company, partnership or trust, but only if the
holding of the interests is in connection with the creation or
management of the investment company, partnership or trust, the return
on such interest is computed in the same manner as the return on an
interest held by a segregated asset account is computed, and there is
no intent to sell such interests to the public;
(3) Held by the trustee of a qualified pension or retirement plan;
or
(4) Held by the public, or treated as owned by the policyholders
pursuant to Rev. Rul. 81-225, see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter,
but only if (A) the investment company, partnership or trust was closed
to the public in accordance with Rev. Rul. 82-55, 1982-1 CB 12, see
Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter, or (B) all the assets of the
segregated asset account are attributable to premium payments made by
policyholders before September 26, 1981, to premium payments made in
connection with a qualified pension or retirement plan, or to any
combination of such premium payments.
Explanation of Provisions
This document contains proposed amendments to 26 CFR part 1 under
section 817(h).
The amendments would remove the sentence from Sec. 1.817-5(a)(2)
which provides that the amount required to be paid to remedy an
inadvertent failure to diversify must be based on the tax that would
have been owed by the policyholders if they were treated as receiving
the income on the contract for the period or periods of
nondiversification.
The amendments also would expand the list of permitted investors in
Sec. 1.817-5(f)(3) to include (i) Qualified tuition programs as
defined in section 529, (ii) trustees of foreign pension plans
established and maintained outside the United States, primarily for the
benefit of individuals, substantially all of whom are nonresident
aliens, and (iii) accounts that, pursuant to Puerto Rican law or
regulation, are segregated from the general asset accounts of the life
insurance companies that own the accounts, provided the requirements of
section 817(d) and (h) are satisfied (without regard to the requirement
the accounts be segregated pursuant to ``State'' law or regulation).
Reasons for Change
1. Proposed Amendment to Sec. 1.817-5(a)(2) (Remedy for Inadvertent
Nondiversification
The proposed regulations would remove the sentence in Sec. 1.817-
5(a)(2) that provides that the payment required to remedy an
inadvertent diversification failure must be based on the tax that would
have been owed by the policyholders if they were treated as receiving
the income on the contract. In Notice 2007-15, 2007-7 I.R.B. 503
(February 12, 2007), the IRS requested comments on how various
correction procedures, including those described in Sec. 1.817-5(a)(2)
and Rev. Proc. 92-25, may be improved. Section 5.03(e) and (f) of the
Notice specifically requested comments on the computation of the
amounts required to be paid under these correction procedures.
Moreover, in the past, the provision in Sec. 1.817-5(a)(2) of the
amount required to be paid has caused confusion about the scope of the
IRS's authority to provide for amounts that depart from the plain
language of the regulation. See, for example, Notice 2000-9, 2000-1
C.B. 449 (reduced amount applied for a limited period of
[[Page 41653]]
time in the case of failures due to investments in U.S. Treasury
securities). See Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter.
Even with the proposed modification of Sec. 1.817-5(a)(2), the
amount required to be paid to remedy an inadvertent failure to
diversify remains the amount set forth in Rev. Proc. 92-25, section
4.02. The modification of Sec. 1.817-5(a)(2) will preserve
flexibility, however, should the IRS choose to modify this amount by
publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin in response to comments on
Notice 2007-15.
2. Expansion of List of Permitted Investors Under Sec. 1.817-5(f)(3)
On July 30, 2003, the Treasury Department and the IRS published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-163974-02, 2003-2 CB 595) under
section 817 in the Federal Register (68 FR 44689), proposing to remove
a specific rule that applied to nonregistered partnerships for purposes
of testing diversification. Written comments were received both on the
proposed regulations and on the need for further guidance under section
817 more generally. Comments on the proposed regulations were taken
into account in final regulations (T.D. 9185, 2005-1 CB 752) that were
published March 1, 2005 in the Federal Register (70 FR 9869). Comments
on section 817 more generally covered a broad range of issues. Two of
those issues have since been addressed by revenue ruling. See Rev. Rul.
2005-7, 2005-1 CB 464 (concerning application of the look-through rule
in the case of tiered regulated investment companies); Rev. Rul. 2007-
7, 2007-7 I.R.B. 468 (February 12, 2007) (concluding that an interest
held by a permitted investor is not treated as an interest held by the
general public for purposes of Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-2 CB 350).
These proposed regulations would expand the list of permitted
investors in Sec. 1.817-5(f)(3) to include two categories of holders
that were the subject of comments in 2003: (i) Qualified tuition
programs as defined in section 529, and (ii) trustees of pension or
retirement plans established and maintained outside of the United
States primarily for the benefit of individuals substantially all of
whom are nonresident aliens.
Section 529 provides for the exemption from Federal income tax of
qualified tuition programs. The term ``qualified tuition program''
means a program established and maintained by a state or agency or
instrumentality thereof or by one or more eligible educational
institutions (A) Under which a person (i) May purchase tuition credits
or certificates on behalf of a designated beneficiary which entitle the
beneficiary to the waiver or payment of qualified higher education
expenses of the beneficiary, or (ii) in the case of a program
established and maintained by a State or agency or instrumentality
thereof, may make contributions to an account which is established for
the purpose of meeting the qualified higher education expenses of the
designated beneficiary of the account, and (B) which meets the other
requirements of section 529(b).
The Treasury Department and the IRS agree with the 2003
commentators that permitting qualified tuition programs and certain
trustees of foreign pension plans to own a beneficial interest in an
investment company, partnership, or trust that is also owned by one or
more segregated asset accounts would be consistent with the purpose and
operation of section 817(h). In addition, neither qualified tuition
programs nor the foreign pension plans that are described in the
proposed regulations present the possibility of investment by the
general public, as that term is used in Rev. Rul. 81-225, 1981-2 CB 12,
and Rev. Rul. 2003-92. See also Rev. Rul. 2007-7. The inclusion of
qualified tuition programs in the list of permitted investors in Sec.
1.817-5(f)(3) does not relieve those programs of the need to satisfy
all requirements of section 529 and the regulations under that section.
In particular, the inclusion of such programs does not imply that an
investment in a single investment company, partnership, or trust
satisfying the minimum diversification requirements of Sec. 1.817-5(b)
would necessarily be treated as a permitted investment under section
529, whether as a ``broad-based investment strategy'' within the
meaning of Notice 2001-55, 2001-2 C.B. 299 or otherwise. The Treasury
Department and the IRS will continue to evaluate other comments
received in this area for future guidance by publication in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Finally, the proposed regulations would expand the list of
permitted investors in Sec. 1.817-5(f)(3) to include investment by an
account which, pursuant to Puerto Rican law or regulation, is
segregated from the general asset accounts of the life insurance
company that owns the account, provided the requirements of section
817(d) and (h) are satisfied (without regard to the requirement that
the account be segregated pursuant to ``State'' law or regulation). The
Treasury Department and the IRS have received a number of requests for
guidance interpreting the term ``variable contract'' to include a
contract issued by a Puerto Rican company, based on accounts that are
segregated under Puerto Rican law or regulation. One reason for these
requests is to ensure that a beneficial interest held by a Puerto Rican
company in an investment company, partnership, or trust does not
prevent look-through treatment for the other holders of an interest in
the same investment, company, partnership, or trust under Sec. 1.817-
5(f)(2). The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that expanding the
list of permitted investors as proposed would address this issue
without implicating the interpretive question of what constitutes a
``State'' within the meaning of sections 817(d) and 7701(a)(10).
Proposed Effective Date
The Treasury Department and the IRS intend these regulations to be
effective on the date the final regulations are published in the
Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because
the regulations do not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the
notice of proposed rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on their
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight
(8) copies) or electronic comments that are timely submitted to the
IRS. In addition to comments on the proposed regulations more
generally, the Treasury Department and the IRS specifically request
comments on (i) the clarity of the proposed regulations and how they
can be made easier to understand; and (ii) whether rules similar to
those proposed to apply to accounts that are segregated pursuant to
Puerto Rican law or regulation should apply to accounts that are
segregated pursuant to the laws or regulations of other territories.
All comments will be available for public inspection and copying. A
public hearing may be scheduled if requested
[[Page 41654]]
in writing by any person that timely submits written or electronic
comments. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date, time,
and place for the hearing will be published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is James Polfer,
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and
Products), Internal Revenue Service. However, personnel from other
offices of the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in their
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAX
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding
an entry in numerical order to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.817-5 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 817(h). * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.817-5 is amended as follows:
1. The last sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(iii) is removed.
2. Paragraph (f)(3)(iii) is revised.
3. Paragraph (f)(3)(iv) is redesignated as paragraph (f)(3)(vii).
4. New paragraphs (f)(3)(iv) through (vi) are added.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.817-5 Diversification requirements for variable annuity,
endowment, and life insurance contracts.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Held by the trustee of a qualified pension or retirement
plan;
(iv) Held by a qualified tuition program as defined in section 529;
(v) Held by the trustee of a pension plan established and
maintained outside of the United States, as defined in section
7701(a)(9), primarily for the benefit of individuals substantially all
of whom are nonresident aliens, as defined in section 7701(b)(1)(B);
(vi) Held by an account which, pursuant to Puerto Rican law or
regulation, is segregated from the general asset accounts of the life
insurance company that owns the account, provided the requirements of
section 817(d) and (h) are satisfied. Solely for purposes of this
paragraph (f)(3)(vi), the requirement under section 817(d)(1) that the
account be segregated pursuant to State law or regulation shall be
disregarded; or
* * * * *
Kevin M. Brown,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7-14620 Filed 7-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P