Airworthiness Directives; Enstrom Helicopter Corporation Model F-28, F-28A, F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28C-2R, F-28F, F-28F-R, 280, 280C, 280F, 280FX, TH-28, 480, and 480B Helicopters, 41615-41618 [07-3711]
Download as PDF
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
has on the prices producers receive for
their commodity. Without volume
control, spearmint oil markets would
likely be over-supplied, resulting in low
producer prices and a large volume of
oil stored and carried over to the next
crop year. The model estimates how
much lower producer prices would
likely be in the absence of volume
controls.
The recommended allotment
percentages, upon which 2006–2007
producer allotments were based, are 153
percent for Scotch (a 108-percentage
point increase from the original
allotment percentage of 45 percent) and
55 percent for Native (a 9 percentage
point increase from the original
allotment percentage of 46 percent).
Without volume controls, producers
would not be limited to these allotment
levels, and could produce and sell
additional spearmint oil. The
econometric model estimated a $1.37
decline in the season average producer
price per pound of Far West spearmint
oil (combining the two classes of
spearmint oil) resulting from the higher
quantities that would be produced and
marketed if volume controls were not
used.
A previous price decline estimate of
$1.49 per pound was based on the
original 2006–2007 allotment
percentages (45 percent for Scotch and
46 percent for Native) published in the
Federal Register on April 5, 2006 (71 FR
16986). The revised estimate reflects the
impact of the additional quantities that
have been made available by this rule
compared to the original allotment
percentages. In actuality, this rule made
available 13,026 additional pounds of
Scotch and 21,624 additional pounds of
Native spearmint oil, since not all
producers have reserve pool oil.
Loosening the volume control
restriction resulted in the smaller price
decline estimate of $1.37 per pound.
The use of volume controls allows the
industry to fully supply spearmint oil
markets while avoiding the negative
consequences of over-supplying these
markets. The use of volume controls is
believed to have little or no effect on
consumer prices of products containing
spearmint oil and will not result in
fewer retail sales of such products.
Based on projections available at the
meeting, the Committee considered
alternatives to each of the increases. The
Committee not only considered leaving
the salable quantity and allotment
percentage unchanged, but also looked
at various increases. The Committee
reached each of its recommendations to
increase the salable quantity and
allotment percentage for Scotch and
Native spearmint oil after careful
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
consideration of all available
information, and believes that the levels
recommended will achieve the
objectives sought. Without the
increases, the Committee believes the
industry would not have been able to
meet market needs.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
spearmint oil handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies. In
addition, as noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict
with this rule.
The AMS is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the spearmint oil
industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Committee deliberations.
Like all Committee meetings, the
February 21, 2007, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express their views
on this issue.
An interim final rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on April 12, 2007. A notice of
the rule was mailed by the Committee’s
staff to all committee members,
producers, handlers, and other
interested persons. In addition, the rule
was made available through the Internet
by USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. That rule provided for a 60-day
comment period which ended June 11,
2007. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that
finalizing the interim final rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (72 FR 18345, April 12, 2007)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41615
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 985
Marketing agreements, Oils and fats,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Spearmint oil.
PART 985—MARKETING ORDER
REGULATING THE HANDLING OF
SPEARMINT OIL PRODUCED IN THE
FAR WEST
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 985, which was
published at 71 FR 18345 on April, 12,
2007, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
I
Dated: July 24, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–14622 Filed 7–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28813; Directorate
Identifier 2007–SW–09–AD; Amendment 39–
15140; AD 2007–16–01]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Enstrom
Helicopter Corporation Model F–28,
F–28A, F–28C, F–28C–2, F–28C–2R, F–
28F, F–28F–R, 280, 280C, 280F, 280FX,
TH–28, 480, and 480B Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Enstrom Helicopter Corporation
(Enstrom) Model F–28, F–28A, F–28C,
F–28C–2, F–28C–2R, F–28F, F–28F–R,
280, 280C, 280F, 280FX, TH–28, 480,
and 480B helicopters. This action
requires a visual check to determine if
a certain serial-numbered main rotor
blade retention pin (retention pin) is
installed, and removing and replacing
any affected retention pin with an
airworthy retention pin. This
amendment is prompted by a report
from the manufacturer that some
retention pins were not manufactured in
accordance with specifications cited on
the engineering drawing. The actions
specified in this AD are intended to
prevent failure of a retention pin,
separation of a main rotor blade from
the helicopter, and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
DATES: Effective August 15, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
41616
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Comments for inclusion in the Rules
Docket must be received on or before
October 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
AD:
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically;
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically;
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590;
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays; or
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
You may get the service information
identified in this AD from Enstrom
Helicopter Corporation, 2209 22nd
Street, P.O. Box 490, Menominee,
Michigan 49858–0490.
EXAMINING THE DOCKET: You may
examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other
information on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647–
5527) is located in Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building at
the street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
the DMS receives them.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory J. Michalik, Senior Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, Chicago Aircraft
Certification Office, 2300 E. Devon Ave.,
Room 107, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018,
telephone (847) 298–7135, fax (847)
294–7834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
amendment adopts a new AD for
Enstrom Model F–28, F–28A, F–28C, F–
28C–2, F–28C–2R, F–28F, F–28F–R,
280, 280C, 280F, 280FX, TH–28, 480,
and 480B helicopters with a retention
pin, part number (P/N) 28–14007–3,
installed, with a serial number (S/N)
that is listed in the following table:
RETENTION PIN S/N
04098–01 through 04098–56.
05018–01 through 05018–36.
05143–01 through 05143–56.
05341–1 through 05341–8.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
This unsafe condition is likely to exist
or develop on other helicopters of the
05341–10 through 05341–17.
same type design. Therefore, this AD is
05341–19.
being issued to prevent failure of a
05341–21 through 05341–33.
retention pin, separation of a main rotor
05341–35 through 05341–42.
blade from the helicopter, and
05341–44 through 05341–59.
subsequent loss of control of the
05341–61.
helicopter. This AD requires removing
05341–62.
and replacing certain serial-numbered
05341–64 through 05341–71.
06214–3 through 06214–14.
retention pins. The visual check
06214–16 through 06214–23.
required by this AD may be performed
06214–25 through 06214–29.
by an owner/operator (pilot), but must
06214–31.
be entered into the aircraft records
06214–33 through 06214–35.
showing compliance with paragraph (a)
06214–37 through 06214–57.
of this AD in accordance with 14 CFR
06214–59 through 06214–68.
43.11 and 91.417(a)(2)(v). This AD
allows a pilot to perform this check
This action requires, before further
because it involves only a visual check
flight, visually checking each retention
of the head of each retention pin to
pin to determine if the S/N, which is
marked on the head of the retention pin, determine the S/N.
The short compliance time involved
is listed in the Applicability section of
is required because the previously
this AD. If there is no serial number
marked on the head of the retention pin described critical unsafe condition can
(i.e., the retention pin head is blank), the adversely affect the controllability and
structural integrity of the helicopter.
retention pin does not need to be
Therefore, removing and replacing each
replaced and this visual check
affected retention pin is required within
constitutes a terminating action for the
5 hours TIS or within 30 days,
requirements of this AD for that
depending on the retention pin’s hours
retention pin. If an affected retention
TIS, which constitutes a very short time
pin is installed, determining the
retention pin’s number of hours time-in- period, and this AD must be issued
immediately.
service (TIS) and removing and
Since a situation exists that requires
replacing it with an airworthy retention
the immediate adoption of this
pin that has a S/N that is not listed in
regulation, it is found that notice and
the Applicability section of this AD is
opportunity for prior public comment
required:
hereon are impracticable, and that good
• Within the next 5 hours TIS or
cause exists for making this amendment
within 30 days, whichever occurs first,
effective in less than 30 days.
if the retention pin has 545 or more
We estimate that this AD will affect
hours TIS, or
• On or before reaching 550 hours TIS 39 helicopters, and
• Determining the S/N of all retention
or within 30 days, whichever occurs
pins (3 on each helicopter) will take
first, if the retention pin has less than
approximately 0.5 work hour;
545 hours TIS.
• Determining the hours TIS of three
This amendment is prompted by a
affected retention pins will take
report from the manufacturer that some
approximately 1 work hour; and
retention pins were manufactured from
• Removing and replacing three
steel that did not meet the specifications retention pins will take approximately 3
cited on the engineering drawing. The
work hours at an average labor rate of
actions specified in this AD are
$80 per work hour. Required parts will
intended to prevent failure of a
cost approximately $680 per helicopter.
retention pin, separation of a main rotor Based on these figures, we estimate the
blade from the helicopter, and
total cost impact of the AD on U.S.
subsequent loss of control of the
operators to be $1,040 per helicopter or
helicopter.
$40,560 if all retention pins get replaced
We have reviewed Enstrom Helicopter on the entire fleet.
Corporation Service Directive Bulletin
(SDB) No. 0102 and Enstrom Helicopter Comments Invited
Corporation SDB No. T–029, both dated
This AD is a final rule that involves
March 20, 2007, which specify visual
requirements that affect flight safety and
and magnetic particle inspections for
was not preceded by notice and an
cracks in certain serial-numbered
opportunity for public comment;
retention pins, and repairing or
however, we invite you to submit any
replacing retention pins in accordance
written data, views, or arguments
with certain inspection criteria. This AD regarding this AD. Send your comments
does not require inspections for cracks
to an address listed under ADDRESSES.
but requires that each affected retention Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2007–28813;
pin be replaced.
Directorate Identifier 2007–SW–09–AD’’
PO 00000
RETENTION PIN S/N—Continued
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend the AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this AD. Using the
search function of our docket Web site,
you can find and read the comments to
any of our dockets, including the name
of the individual who sent the
comment. You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78), or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
this AD. See the DMS to examine the
economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding
a new airworthiness directive to read as
follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41617
2007–16–01 Enstrom Helicopter
Corporation: Amendment 39–15140.
Docket No. FAA–2007–28813;
Directorate Identifier 2007–SW–09–AD.
Applicability: Model F–28, F–28A, F–28C,
F–28C–2, F–28C–2R, F–28F, F–28F–R, 280,
280C, 280F, 280FX, TH–28, 480, and 480B
helicopters, with a main rotor blade retention
pin (retention pin) having a serial number (S/
N) that is listed in the following table,
installed, certificated in any category:
RETENTION PIN S/N
04098–01 through 04098–56.
05018–01 through 05018–36.
05143–01 through 05143–56.
05341–1 through 05341–8.
05341–10 through 05341–17.
05341–19.
05341–21 through 05341–33.
05341–35 through 05341–42.
05341–44 through 05341–59.
05341–61.
05341–62.
05341–64 through 05341–71.
06214–3 through 06214–14.
06214–16 through 06214–23.
06214–25 through 06214–29.
06214–31.
06214–33 through 06214–35.
06214–37 through 06214–57.
06214–59 through 06214–68.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless
accomplished previously.
To prevent failure of a retention pin,
separation of a main rotor blade from the
helicopter, and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter, accomplish the following:
(a) Before further flight, check the S/N that
is marked on the head of each retention pin
to see if it is a S/N that is listed in the
Applicability section of this AD. See Figure
1 for the location of the S/N. If there is no
serial number marked on the head of the
retention pin (i.e., the retention pin head is
blank), the retention pin does not need to be
replaced and this determination constitutes a
terminating action for the requirements of
this AD for that retention pin.
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(b) The visual check required by paragraph
(a) of this AD may be performed by an
owner/operator (pilot) holding at least a
private pilot certificate, and must be entered
into the aircraft records showing compliance
with paragraph (a) of this AD in accordance
with 14 CFR sections 43.11 and
91.417(a)(2)(v).
(c) Determine the number of hours TIS for
any affected retention pin and replace the
retention pin with an airworthy retention pin
as follows:
(1) For a retention pin with 545 or more
hours TIS, remove the retention pin and
replace it with an airworthy retention pin
with a S/N that is not listed in the
Applicability section of this AD within the
next 5 hours TIS or within 30 days,
whichever occurs first.
(2) For a retention pin with less than 545
hours TIS, remove the retention pin and
replace it with an airworthy retention pin
with a S/N that is not listed in the
Applicability section of this AD on or before
reaching 550 hours TIS or within 30 days,
whichever occurs first.
Note: Enstrom Service Directive Bulletin
No. T–029 and Enstrom Service Directive
Bulletin 0102, both dated March 20, 2007,
pertain to the subject of this AD.
(d) Removing any affected retention pin
and replacing it with an airworthy retention
pin that is not included in the Applicability
section of this AD is considered a terminating
action for the requirements of this AD for that
retention pin.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 Jul 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
(e) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Chicago Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, ATTN: Gregory J.
Michalik, Senior Aerospace Engineer, 2300 E.
Devon Ave., Room 107, Des Plaines, Illinois,
60018, telephone (847) 298–7135, fax (847)
294–7834, for information about previously
approved alternative methods of compliance.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on
August 15, 2007.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 24,
2007.
David A. Downey,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 07–3711 Filed 7–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 558
New Animal Drugs For Use in Animal
Feeds; Ractopamine and Tylosin
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect
approval of a supplemental new animal
drug application (NADA) filed by
Elanco Animal Health. The
supplemental NADA revises the
indications for use of two-way
combination Type B and Type C
medicated swine feeds formulated with
ractopamine hydrochloride and tylosin
phosphate.
DATES:
This rule is effective July 31,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harlan J. Howard, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–120), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–0231, email: harlan.howard@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Elanco
Animal Health, a Division of Eli Lilly &
Co., Lilly Corporate Center,
Indianapolis, IN 46285, filed a
supplement to NADA 141–172 that
provides for use of two-way
combination Type B and Type C
medicated swine feeds formulated with
PAYLEAN (ractopamine hydrochloride)
and TYLAN (tylosin phosphate) single-
E:\FR\FM\31JYR1.SGM
31JYR1
ER31JY07.016
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
41618
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 146 (Tuesday, July 31, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41615-41618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3711]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-28813; Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-09-AD;
Amendment 39-15140; AD 2007-16-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Enstrom Helicopter Corporation Model F-
28, F-28A, F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28C-2R, F-28F, F-28F-R, 280, 280C, 280F,
280FX, TH-28, 480, and 480B Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Enstrom Helicopter Corporation (Enstrom) Model F-28, F-28A, F-28C, F-
28C-2, F-28C-2R, F-28F, F-28F-R, 280, 280C, 280F, 280FX, TH-28, 480,
and 480B helicopters. This action requires a visual check to determine
if a certain serial-numbered main rotor blade retention pin (retention
pin) is installed, and removing and replacing any affected retention
pin with an airworthy retention pin. This amendment is prompted by a
report from the manufacturer that some retention pins were not
manufactured in accordance with specifications cited on the engineering
drawing. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent
failure of a retention pin, separation of a main rotor blade from the
helicopter, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Effective August 15, 2007.
[[Page 41616]]
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before October 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this AD:
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically;
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically;
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590;
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays; or
Fax: 202-493-2251.
You may get the service information identified in this AD from
Enstrom Helicopter Corporation, 2209 22nd Street, P.O. Box 490,
Menominee, Michigan 49858-0490.
Examining the Docket: You may examine the docket that contains the AD,
any comments, and other information on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is located in Room
W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the street address
stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after the DMS receives them.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory J. Michalik, Senior Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Chicago Aircraft
Certification Office, 2300 E. Devon Ave., Room 107, Des Plaines,
Illinois 60018, telephone (847) 298-7135, fax (847) 294-7834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This amendment adopts a new AD for Enstrom
Model F-28, F-28A, F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28C-2R, F-28F, F-28F-R, 280, 280C,
280F, 280FX, TH-28, 480, and 480B helicopters with a retention pin,
part number (P/N) 28-14007-3, installed, with a serial number (S/N)
that is listed in the following table:
Retention Pin S/N
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
04098-01 through 04098-56.
05018-01 through 05018-36.
05143-01 through 05143-56.
05341-1 through 05341-8.
05341-10 through 05341-17.
05341-19.
05341-21 through 05341-33.
05341-35 through 05341-42.
05341-44 through 05341-59.
05341-61.
05341-62.
05341-64 through 05341-71.
06214-3 through 06214-14.
06214-16 through 06214-23.
06214-25 through 06214-29.
06214-31.
06214-33 through 06214-35.
06214-37 through 06214-57.
06214-59 through 06214-68.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This action requires, before further flight, visually checking each
retention pin to determine if the S/N, which is marked on the head of
the retention pin, is listed in the Applicability section of this AD.
If there is no serial number marked on the head of the retention pin
(i.e., the retention pin head is blank), the retention pin does not
need to be replaced and this visual check constitutes a terminating
action for the requirements of this AD for that retention pin. If an
affected retention pin is installed, determining the retention pin's
number of hours time-in-service (TIS) and removing and replacing it
with an airworthy retention pin that has a S/N that is not listed in
the Applicability section of this AD is required:
Within the next 5 hours TIS or within 30 days, whichever
occurs first, if the retention pin has 545 or more hours TIS, or
On or before reaching 550 hours TIS or within 30 days,
whichever occurs first, if the retention pin has less than 545 hours
TIS.
This amendment is prompted by a report from the manufacturer that some
retention pins were manufactured from steel that did not meet the
specifications cited on the engineering drawing. The actions specified
in this AD are intended to prevent failure of a retention pin,
separation of a main rotor blade from the helicopter, and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
We have reviewed Enstrom Helicopter Corporation Service Directive
Bulletin (SDB) No. 0102 and Enstrom Helicopter Corporation SDB No. T-
029, both dated March 20, 2007, which specify visual and magnetic
particle inspections for cracks in certain serial-numbered retention
pins, and repairing or replacing retention pins in accordance with
certain inspection criteria. This AD does not require inspections for
cracks but requires that each affected retention pin be replaced.
This unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other
helicopters of the same type design. Therefore, this AD is being issued
to prevent failure of a retention pin, separation of a main rotor blade
from the helicopter, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
This AD requires removing and replacing certain serial-numbered
retention pins. The visual check required by this AD may be performed
by an owner/operator (pilot), but must be entered into the aircraft
records showing compliance with paragraph (a) of this AD in accordance
with 14 CFR 43.11 and 91.417(a)(2)(v). This AD allows a pilot to
perform this check because it involves only a visual check of the head
of each retention pin to determine the S/N.
The short compliance time involved is required because the
previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the
controllability and structural integrity of the helicopter. Therefore,
removing and replacing each affected retention pin is required within 5
hours TIS or within 30 days, depending on the retention pin's hours
TIS, which constitutes a very short time period, and this AD must be
issued immediately.
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
We estimate that this AD will affect 39 helicopters, and
Determining the S/N of all retention pins (3 on each
helicopter) will take approximately 0.5 work hour;
Determining the hours TIS of three affected retention pins
will take approximately 1 work hour; and
Removing and replacing three retention pins will take
approximately 3 work hours at an average labor rate of $80 per work
hour. Required parts will cost approximately $680 per helicopter. Based
on these figures, we estimate the total cost impact of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $1,040 per helicopter or $40,560 if all retention pins
get replaced on the entire fleet.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect
flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for
public comment; however, we invite you to submit any written data,
views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-28813;
Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-09-AD''
[[Page 41617]]
at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on
the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of
the AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and
may amend the AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of our docket
Web site, you can find and read the comments to any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual who sent the comment. You may
review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD. See the DMS to examine the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive to
read as follows:
2007-16-01 Enstrom Helicopter Corporation: Amendment 39-15140.
Docket No. FAA-2007-28813; Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-09-AD.
Applicability: Model F-28, F-28A, F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28C-2R, F-
28F, F-28F-R, 280, 280C, 280F, 280FX, TH-28, 480, and 480B
helicopters, with a main rotor blade retention pin (retention pin)
having a serial number (S/N) that is listed in the following table,
installed, certificated in any category:
Retention Pin S/N
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
04098-01 through 04098-56.
05018-01 through 05018-36.
05143-01 through 05143-56.
05341-1 through 05341-8.
05341-10 through 05341-17.
05341-19.
05341-21 through 05341-33.
05341-35 through 05341-42.
05341-44 through 05341-59.
05341-61.
05341-62.
05341-64 through 05341-71.
06214-3 through 06214-14.
06214-16 through 06214-23.
06214-25 through 06214-29.
06214-31.
06214-33 through 06214-35.
06214-37 through 06214-57.
06214-59 through 06214-68.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of a retention pin, separation of a main
rotor blade from the helicopter, and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter, accomplish the following:
(a) Before further flight, check the S/N that is marked on the
head of each retention pin to see if it is a S/N that is listed in
the Applicability section of this AD. See Figure 1 for the location
of the S/N. If there is no serial number marked on the head of the
retention pin (i.e., the retention pin head is blank), the retention
pin does not need to be replaced and this determination constitutes
a terminating action for the requirements of this AD for that
retention pin.
[[Page 41618]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR31JY07.016
(b) The visual check required by paragraph (a) of this AD may be
performed by an owner/operator (pilot) holding at least a private
pilot certificate, and must be entered into the aircraft records
showing compliance with paragraph (a) of this AD in accordance with
14 CFR sections 43.11 and 91.417(a)(2)(v).
(c) Determine the number of hours TIS for any affected retention
pin and replace the retention pin with an airworthy retention pin as
follows:
(1) For a retention pin with 545 or more hours TIS, remove the
retention pin and replace it with an airworthy retention pin with a
S/N that is not listed in the Applicability section of this AD
within the next 5 hours TIS or within 30 days, whichever occurs
first.
(2) For a retention pin with less than 545 hours TIS, remove the
retention pin and replace it with an airworthy retention pin with a
S/N that is not listed in the Applicability section of this AD on or
before reaching 550 hours TIS or within 30 days, whichever occurs
first.
Note: Enstrom Service Directive Bulletin No. T-029 and Enstrom
Service Directive Bulletin 0102, both dated March 20, 2007, pertain
to the subject of this AD.
(d) Removing any affected retention pin and replacing it with an
airworthy retention pin that is not included in the Applicability
section of this AD is considered a terminating action for the
requirements of this AD for that retention pin.
(e) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
ATTN: Gregory J. Michalik, Senior Aerospace Engineer, 2300 E. Devon
Ave., Room 107, Des Plaines, Illinois, 60018, telephone (847) 298-
7135, fax (847) 294-7834, for information about previously approved
alternative methods of compliance.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on August 15, 2007.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 24, 2007.
David A. Downey,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 07-3711 Filed 7-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P