Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Central California Seabird Research Operations, 41294-41298 [E7-14584]
Download as PDF
41294
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
and to partially compensate the agency
for the unique added costs of
management and enforcement of the
Program. Section 313(j) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act provided
supplementary authority to section
304(d)(2)(A) and additional detail for
cost recovery provisions specific to the
Program. The cost recovery provision
allows collection of 133 percent of the
actual management, data collecting, and
enforcement costs up to three percent of
the ex-vessel value of crab harvested
under the Program. Additionally,
section 313(j) requires the harvesting
and processing sectors to each pay half
the cost recovery fees. Catcher/processor
quota share holders are required to pay
the full fee percentage.
A crab allocation holder generally
incurs a cost recovery fee liability for
every pound of crab landed. The crab
allocations include Individual Fishing
Quota (IFQ), Crew IFQ, Individual
Processing Quota, Community
Development Quota, and the Adak
community allocation. The Registered
Crab Receiver (RCR) permit holder must
collect the fee liability from the crab
allocation holder who is landing crab.
Additionally, the RCR permit holder
must collect his or her own fee liability
for all crab delivered to the RCR. The
RCR permit holder is responsible for
submitting this payment to NMFS on or
before the due date of July 31, following
the crab fishing year in which payment
for the crab is made.
The dollar amount of the fee due is
determined by multiplying the fee
percentage (not to exceed three percent)
by the ex-vessel value of crab debited
from the allocation. Specific details on
the Program’s cost recovery provision
may be found in the implementing
regulations set forth at 50 CFR 680.44.
Fee Percentage
Each year, NMFS calculates and
publishes in the Federal Register the fee
percentage according to the factors and
methodology described in Federal
regulations at § 680.44(c)(2). The
formula for determining the fee
percentage is the ’direct program costs’
divided by ’value of the fishery’, where
’direct program costs’ are the direct
program costs for the Crab
Rationalization Program for the previous
fiscal year, and ’value of the fishery’ is
the ex-vessel value of the catch subject
to the crab cost recovery fee liability for
the current year. Using this fee
percentage formula, the estimated
percentage of costs to value for the
2006/2007 fishery was 4.38 percent.
However, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, at
§ 304(d)(2)(B), prohibits NMFS from
collecting fees greater that three percent
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
of the ex-vessel value of the crab
harvests under the Program. Therefore,
the fee percentage will remain three
percent for the 2007–2008 crab fishing
year.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862 et seq.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–14574 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
Dated: July 23, 2007.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–14588 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XB17
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Specified Activities; Central
California Seabird Research
Operations
[I.D. 042707A]
AGENCY:
Marine Mammals; File No. 486–1919
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice; Denial of Permit.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
request for a permit to conduct scientific
research on marine mammals, submitted
by Brent Stewart, Ph.D, J.D, HubbsSeaWorld Research Institute, 2595
Ingraham Street, San Diego, CA 92109,
has been denied.
The application and related
documents are available for review
upon written request or by appointment
in the following office(s):
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301)713–2289; fax (301)427–2521; and
Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213; phone (562)980–4001;
fax (562)980–4018.
ADDRESSES:
Kate
Swails or Tammy Adams, (301)713–
2289.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On May
15, 2007, a notice was published in the
Federal Register (72 FR 27291) that an
application had been filed by the above
named individual. The requested permit
has been denied subject to the
provisions of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361
et seq.), and the regulations governing
the taking and importing of marine
mammals (50 CFR part 216).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed
authorization for an incidental take
authorization; request for comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request
from the PRBO Conservation Science
(PRBO) for an authorization to take
California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals,
northern elephant seals and Steller sea
lions, by harassment, incidental to
central California seabird research
operations on Southeast Farallon Island,
Ano Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes
National Seashore (NS). Under the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments
on its proposal to issue an authorization
to PRBO to incidentally take, by
harassment, small numbers of these
species of pinnipeds during the next 12
months.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than August 27,
2007.
Comments on the
application and draft Environmental
Assessment (EA) should be addressed to
P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225, or by telephoning the
contact listed here. The mailbox address
for providing e-mail comments is
PR1.0648–XB17@noaa.gov. Comments
sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10–
megabyte file size. A copy of the
application, NMFS’ draft environmental
assessment (EA), and other related
documents may be obtained by writing
to this address or by telephoning one of
the contacts listed here (see FOR
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) and is
also available at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext
137.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
An authorization shall be granted if
NMFS finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s) and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses and that the
permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such taking are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of small numbers
of marine mammals. Within 45 days of
the close of the comment period, NMFS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
must either issue or deny issuance of
the authorization.
Summary of Request
On December 15, 2006, PRBO
submitted an application to NMFS
requesting an Incidental Harassment
Authorization (IHA) for the possible
harassment of small numbers of
California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus), Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina richardsi), northern
elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris),
and Steller sea lions (Eumetopias
jubatus) incidental to central
California seabird research operations
on Southeast Farallon Island, Ano
Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes NS. A
detailed description of the proposed
activity is presented below:
Southeast Farallon Island
The Southeast Farallon Island is
located 28 miles (45 km) offshore of San
Francisco, California (37° 41′55″N, 123°
00′10″W). Seabird research activities on
the Southeast Farallon Island would
involve observational and ‘‘hands on’’
ecological studies of breeding seabirds.
Occasionally researchers may travel to
coastal areas of the island to conduct
observational seabird research where
non breeding marine mammals are
present. These sorts of tasks include
viewing breeding seabirds from an
observation blind or censusing
shorebirds. This activity usually
involves one or two observers. Access to
the refuge involves landing in small,
14–18 ft (4.3 - 5.5 m) open motorboats
which are hoisted onto the island using
a derrick system.
Research on the Southeast Farallon
Island would be conducted year round.
Most intertidal areas of the island,
where pinnipeds are present, would be
rarely visited in seabird research. Most
potential for incidental take will occur
at the island’s 2 landings, North
Landing and East Landing. These sites
would be visited approximately 1 - 3
times per day by researchers. In both
locations researchers would not be
approaching less than 50 ft (15 m) from
any pinnipeds which may be hauled
out. Most visits to these areas would be
brief (approximately 15 minutes),
though seabird observers would be
present from 2 - 5 hours daily at North
Landing from early April early August
to conduct observational studies on
breeding Common Murres. Boat
landings to re-supply the field station,
lasting 1 - 3 hours, would be conducted
once every 2 weeks at one of the these
locations. Activities involve launching
of the boat with one operator, with 2 4 other researchers assisting with the
operations from land. At East Landing,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41295
the primary landing site, all personnel
assisting with the landing would stay on
the loading platform 30 ft (9 m) above
the water. At North Landing, loading
operations would occur at the water
level in the intertidal.
Ano Nuevo Island
Ano Nuevo Island is located 0.25 mi
(0.4 km) offshore of Ano Nuevo Point in
San Mateo County, California (37°06′N,
122°20′W). All seabird research work on
the Ano Nuevo Island would be in
collaborations with Oikonos Ecosystem Knowledge and through a
collaborative agreement with the
California State Parks. Procedures
include accessing the island by a 12 ft
(3.7 m) Zodiac boat. Non-breeding
pinnipeds may occasionally be present
on the small beach in the center of the
island where the boat would be landed.
Sea lions may also occasionally be
present near a small group of
subterranean seabird nest boxes on the
island terrace. There are usually 2 - 3
researchers involved in island visits.
Research on the Ano Nuevo Island
would be conducted once per week
from April to August, and occasional
intermittent visits would be made
during the rest of the year. A component
of the seabird research involves nesting
habitat restoration and monitoring,
which requires sporadic visits from
September to November, between the
seabird breeding season and the
elephant seal pupping season. Most
intertidal areas of the island where
marine mammals are present will not be
visited during seabird research,
excepting the landing beach. Most
likely, marine mammal incidental take
would occur at this location as well as
just north of this beach up on the
island’s terrace where a small number of
seabird nest boxes are located. The
landing beach would be visited upon
arrival and departure during the weekly
visit, and the nest boxes would be
checked once on the day of visit. In both
locations researchers would not
approach less than 50 ft (15 m) away
from any pinnipeds which may be
hauled out. Landings and visits to nest
boxes would be brief (approximately 15
minutes).
Point Reyes National Seashore
Point Reyes NS is located 40 miles (64
km) north of San Francisco Bay,
California. The National Park Service
(NPS) conducts research, resource
management and routine maintenance
services at Point Reyes NS. Research
along the seashore includes monitoring
seabird breeding and roosting colonies.
Seabird monitoring usually would
involve one or two observers. Surveys
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
41296
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
would be conducted in small, 14 - 22 ft
(4.3 - 6.7 m) open motorboats that
survey along the shoreline. These
activities could result in the incidental
harassment of pinnipeds. Additionally,
NPS would also conduct habitat
restoration of the seashore, which
would include removal of non-native
plants and restoration of coastal dune
habitat. Non-native plant removal
would be timed to avoid the breeding
seasons of pinnipeds, however, on
occasion non-breeding animals may be
present at various beaches throughout
the year.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Description of the Marine Mammals
Potentially Affected by the Activity
The marine mammals most likely to
be found in the proposed seabird
research areas are the California sea
lions, Pacific harbor seals, Steller sea
lions, and northern elephant seals.
General information of these species can
be found in Caretta et al. (2007), which
is available at the following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/
po2006.pdf. Refer to that document for
information on these species.
Additional information on these species
is presented below.
Northern Elephant Seal
The northern elephant breeding
population is distributed from central
Baja California, Mexico, to the Point
Reyes Peninsula in northern California.
Along this coastline there are 13 major
breeding colonies. The northern
elephant seal was exploited for its oil
during the 18th and 19th centuries and
by 1900 the population was reduced to
20–30 individuals on Guadalupe Island
(Hoelzel et al., 1993; Hoelzel, 1999). As
a result of this bottleneck the genetic
diversity found in this species is
extremely low (Hoelzel, 1999). The
recent formation of most rookeries
indicates that there is no genetic
differentiation among populations.
Although movement and genetic
exchange occurs among colonies, most
seals return to their natal site to breed
(Huber et al., 1991). Recolonization of
their former breeding range progressed
north from the San Benito and
Guadalupe Islands off Baja California to
the most recent northernmost breeding
site at Point Reyes Headlands. In the last
three decades, annual pup production
has increased at the rate of 9.43 + or
¥0.51 percent per year in California
and 5.19 + or ¥0.33 percent per year
over the entire range (Barlow et al.,
1993). A complete population count of
elephant seals is not possible because
all age classes are not ashore at the same
time. Elephant seal population size is
usually estimated by counting the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
number of pups produced and
multiplying by the inverse of the
expected ratio of pups to total animals
(McCann, 1985). Stewart et al. (1994)
used McCann’s multiplier of 4.5 to
extrapolate from 28,164 pups to a
population estimate of 127,000 elephant
seals in the U.S. and Mexico in 1991.
The multiplier of 4.5 was based on a
stable population. Boveng (1988) and
Barlow et al. (1993) argue that a
multiplier of 3.5 is more appropriate for
a rapidly growing population such as
the California stock of elephant seals.
Based on the estimated 28,450 pups
born in California and this 3.5
multiplier, the California stock was
approximately 101,000 in 2001 (Carretta
et al., 2002). At Point Reyes, the
population grew at 32.8 percent per year
between 1988 and 1997 (Sydeman and
Allen, 1999) and around 10 percent per
year since 2000 (S. Allen, unpubl. data),
and in 2006 around 700 pups were born
at three primary breeding areas. The
population on the Farallon Islands has
declined by 3.4 percent per year since
1983, and in recent years numbers have
fluctuated between 100 and 200 pups
(W. Sydeman, D. Lee, unpubl. data).
Elephant seals congregate in central
California to breed from late November
to March. Females typically give birth to
a single pup and attend the pup for up
to 6 weeks. Breeding occurs after the
pup is weaned by attending males. After
breeding, seals migrate to the Gulf of
Alaska or deeper waters in the eastern
Pacific. Adult females and juveniles
return to terrestrial colonies to molt in
April and May, and males return in June
and July to molt, remaining onshore for
around 3 weeks.
Pacific Harbor Seal
Harbor seals are one of the most
widely distributed northern hemisphere
pinnipeds and are found in coastal,
estuarine and some times fresh water of
both the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific
Oceans. There is considerable regional
genetic differentiation between harbor
seal populations as they are generally
limited in migratory movements. Under
the MMPA, six stocks of Pacific harbor
seals are identified within the U.S.
waters (Angliss and Lodge, 2004;
Carretta et al., 2006). Only the California
stock of harbor seal is found in the
proposed project area, and its
abundance is estimated to be 34,233
(Carretta et al., 2006). There is some
question whether the San Francisco Bay
population may be a separate stock
based on genetic analyses (D. German,
Sonoma State University, pers. com.). At
Point Reyes, the harbor seal population
is estimated to be 7,524 for the molt
season based on a correction factor of
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1.65 (Lowry et al., 2005; Manna et al.,
2006).
In central California, harbor seals
breed annually from March through
May and molt in June and July. Females
give birth to a single pup and attend the
pup for around 30 days, at which time
they wean pups. Mating occurs in the
water around the time of weaning.
Harbor seals are resident year round at
terrestrial colonies, however, juveniles
may disperse to other colonies ranging
up to 500 km (311 mi). Individual adult
seals may also migrate widely from
breeding colonies.
California Sea Lion
California sea lions range from
southern Mexico up to British Columbia
and breed almost entirely on islands in
southern California, Western Baja
California and the Gulf of California. In
recent years, California sea lions have
begun to breed annually in small
numbers at Ano Nuevo Island and
South Farallon Island, California. One
abandoned pup was found at Point
Reyes NS at Wildcat Beach in 2003.
This species is separated into three
recognized stocks based on three
geographic regions (U.S. stock, Western
Baja stock, and the Gulf of California
stock; Lowry et al. 1992). Some
movement has been documented
between these geographic stocks, but
rookeries in the U.S. are widely
separated from major rookeries of
western Baja California, Mexico (Barlow
et al., 1995). The U.S. stock of California
sea lion is the only stock present in the
proposed research area. The California
sea lion has the largest population of
any sea lion species and is the only sea
lion whose population is showing a
healthy growth rate of 5 to 6.2 percent
per annum. Annual incidental takes in
fisheries is approximately 915
individuals; however, the population is
growing by 8.2 percent per year and
fishing mortality is declining (Barlow et
al., 1995). Current U.S. population
estimates range from 237,000 to 244,000
(Carretta et al., 2007).
California sea lions give birth in May
through July and breeding occurs in July
and August. Females and pups are
resident at breeding colonies year round
and males migrate north to feeding areas
from central California to British
Columbia, Canada. During years of low
food availability (e.g., El Nino Southern
Oscillation, or ENSO), females and
juveniles may also migrate north in
search of prey; and in some particularly
poor years (1997 - 1998), there can be
mass mortality of pups at rookeries.
On the Farallon Islands California sea
lions haul out in many intertidal areas
year round, fluctuating from several
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
hundred to several thousand animals.
Breeding animals are concentrated in
areas where researchers would not visit
(PRBO, unpublished data).
California sea lions at Point Reyes
haul out at only a couple locations, but
will occur on human structures such as
boat ramps. The annual population
averages around 300 - 500 during the
fall through spring months, although on
occasion, several thousand sea lions can
arrive depending upon local prey
resources (S. Allen, unpublished data).
Steller Sea Lion
Steller sea lions breed from the Kuril
Islands and Okhotsk Sea through the
Aleutian Islands and the Gulf of Alaska,
and south to central California (Merrick
et al., 1987). Two separate stocks are
recognized within U.S. waters: an
eastern U.S. stock that includes animals
east of Cape Suckling, Alaska (144° W),
and a western U.S. stock that includes
animals’ west of Cape Suckling. In 1990,
the Steller sea lion was listed as a
threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA), and the
western stock was listed as endangered
in 1997.
The eastern stock of Steller sea lions
breeds on rookeries located in southeast
Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon, and
California (including the proposed
research area). Steller sea lions give
birth in May through July and breeding
occurs a couple of weeks after birth.
Non-reproductive animals congregate at
a few haul out sites, including at Ano
Nuevo and Point Reyes Headland. Pups
are weaned during the winter and
spring of the following year. On the
Farallon and Ano Nuevo Islands, Steller
sea lion breeding colonies are located in
closed areas where researchers never
visited, eliminating any risk of
disturbing breeding animals.
Count of pups on rookeries conducted
near the end of the birthing season are
nearly complete counts of pup
production. Using the most recent 2005
pup counts available by region from
aerial surveys across the range of the
eastern stock, the total population of the
eastern stock of Steller sea lions is
estimated to be 47,885. This is based on
multiplying the total number of pups
counted in southeast Alaska (5,519),
British Columbia (3,281), Oregon
(1,128), and California (713) by 4.5
(Angliss and Outlaw, 2007). Because the
eastern stock of Steller sea lions is
increasing within most of its range,
using the 4.5 multiplier is a reasonable
approach to estimating abundance from
pup counts (Angliss and Outlaw, 2007).
Steller sea lion numbers in California,
especially in southern and central
California, have declined from historic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
numbers. Counts in California between
1927 and 1947 ranged between 5,000
and 7,000 non-pups with no apparent
trend, but have subsequently declined
by over 50 percent, remaining between
1,500 and 2,000 non-pups during 1980–
2001. Limited information suggests that
counts in northern California appear to
be stable (NMFS, 1995). At Ano Nuevo
Island, a steady decline in ground
counts started around 1970, resulting in
an 85 percent reduction in the breeding
population by 1987 (LeBoeuf et al.,
1991). In vertical aerial photographic
counts conducted at Ano Nuevo, pups
declined at a rate of 9.9 percent from
1990 to 1993, while non-pups declined
at a rate of 31.5 percent over the same
time period (Westlake et al., 1997). Pup
counts at Ano Nuevo have been steadily
declining at about 5 percent annually
since 1990 (W. Perryman, NMFSSWFSC, pers. comm.). On Southeast
Farallon Island, the abundance of Steller
sea lion females declined an average of
3.6 percent per year from 1974 to 1997
(Sydeman and Allen, 1999). Pup counts
on the Farallon Islands have generally
varied from 5 - 15 (Hastings and
Sydeman, 2002,; PRBO unpublished
data). The most recent pup counts at
Ano Nuevo Island and the Farallones
are 349 in 2000 and 287 in 2001 (M.
Lowry, NMFS-SWFSC, pers. comm.).
Pups have not been born at Point Reyes
Headland since the 1970s and Steller
sea lions are seen in very low numbers
there currently (S. Allen, unpubl. data).
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
and Their Habitat
The only anticipated impacts would
be temporary disturbances caused by
the appearance of researchers near the
pinnipeds. The potential disturbance
might alter pinniped behavior and cause
animals to flush from the area. Animals
may return to the same site once
researchers have left or go to an
alternate haul out site, which usually
occurs within 30 minutes (Allen et al.,
1985). Long term effects of this
disturbance are unlikely, as very few
breeding animals will be present in the
vicinity of the proposed seabird
research areas. The proposed seabird
research would not result in the
physical altering of marine mammal
habitat. No marine mammal habitat is
expected to be affected by the proposed
action. No marine mammal critical
habitat is found within the proposed
research area.
There is no subsistence harvest of
marine mammals in the proposed
research area, therefore, there will be no
impact of the activity on the availability
of the species or stocks of marine
mammals for subsistence uses.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41297
Number of Marine Mammals Expected
to Be Taken
It is expected that approximately
2,422 California sea lions, 500 harbor
seals, 273 northern elephant seals, and
14 Steller sea lions could be potentially
affected by Level B harassment. This
estimate is based on previous research
experiences, with the same activities
conducted in the proposed research
area, and on marine mammal research
activities in these areas. These
incidental harassment take numbers
represent approximately 1 percent of the
U.S. stock of California sea lion, 1.5
percent of the California stock of Pacific
harbor seal, 0.3 percent of the California
breeding stock of northern elephant
seal, and 0.03 percent of the eastern U.S.
stock of Steller sea lion. All of the
potential takes are expected to be Level
B behavioral harassment only. No injury
or mortality to pinnipeds is expected or
requested.
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting
The researchers would take all
possible measures to reduce marine
mammal disturbance for the activities
described above. Researchers would
keep their voices hushed and bodies
low in the visual presence of pinnipeds.
Seabird observations at North Landing
on Southeast Farallon Island would be
conducted in an observation blind
where researchers are shielded from the
view of hauled out pinnipeds. Beach
landings on Ano Nuevo Island would
only occur after any pinnipeds that
might be present on the landing beach
have entered the water. Ano Nuevo
Island researchers accessing seabird nest
boxes would crawl slowly if pinnipeds
are within view.
Visits to intertidal areas of Southeast
Farallon Island during research
activities would be coordinated to
reduce potential take. All research goals
on Ano Nuevo Island would be
coordinated to minimize the necessary
number of trips to the island. Once on
Ano Nuevo Island, researchers would
coordinate monitoring schedules so
areas near any pinnipeds would be
accessed only once per visit. The lead
biologist would always serve as an
observer to evaluate incidental take and
halt any research activities should the
potential for incidental take be too great.
Researchers would take notes of sea
lions and seals observed within the
proposed research area during studies.
The notes would provide dates, time,
tidal height, species, numbers of sea
lions and seals present, and any
disturbances. PRBO would submit a
final report, including these notes, to
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
41298
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
NMFS requests interested persons to
submit comments, information, and
suggestions concerning this request (see
ADDRESSES).
NMFS within 90 days after the
expiration of the IHA, if it is issued.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NMFS has prepared a draft EA for
public review and comment (see
ADDRESSES), that describes the impact
on the human environment that would
result from implementation of this
action. NMFS has concluded,
preliminarily, that no significant impact
on the human environment would
result.
ESA
NMFS is conducting a Section 7
consultation under the ESA to make a
determination whether the proposed
research project would be likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
the eastern U.S. stock of Steller sea
lions.
Preliminary Determinations
For the reasons discussed in this
document and in the identified
supporting documents, NMFS has
preliminarily determined that the
impact of seabird research on Southeast
Farallon Island, Ano Nuevo Island, and
Point Reyes NS would result, at worst,
in the Level B harassment of small
numbers of California sea lions, Pacific
harbor seals, northern elephant seals,
and Steller sea lions hauled out in the
vicinity of the proposed research area.
While behavioral modifications,
including temporarily vacating the area
during the survey period, may be made
by these species to avoid the resultant
visual disturbance, the availability of
alternate areas within these areas and
haul-out sites has led NMFS to
preliminarily determine that this action
will have a negligible impact on
California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals,
northern elephant seals, and Steller sea
lions.
In addition, no take by Level A
harassment (injury) or death is
anticipated and harassment takes
should be at the lowest level practicable
due to incorporation of the mitigation
measures described in this document.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Proposed Authorization
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to
PRBO for the potential harassment of
small numbers of California sea lions,
harbor seals, northern elephant seals,
and Steller sea lions incidental to
conducting of seabird research on
Southeast Farallon Island, Ano Nuevo
Island, and Point Reyes NS, provided
the previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
Dated: July 23, 2007.
Helen Golde,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–14584 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance the following
proposal for collection of information
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Agency: United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO).
Title: Patent and Trademark Financial
Transactions.
Form Number(s): PTO–2038, PTO–
2231, PTO–2232, PTO–2233, PTO–2234,
PTO–2236.
Agency Approval Number: 0651–
0043.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Burden: 58,166 hours annually,
including 50 hours per year for
Financial Profiles.
Number of Respondents: 1,929,205
responses per year, including 500
responses per year for Financial
Profiles.
Avg. Hours per Response: The USPTO
estimates that it will take the public
approximately two to four minutes (0.03
to 0.07 hours) to prepare and submit the
existing items in this collection. The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public approximately six minutes (0.10
hours) to complete and submit a
Financial Profile.
Needs and Uses: Under 35 U.S.C. 41
and 15 U.S.C. 1113, as implemented in
37 CFR 1.16–1.28, 2.6–2.7, and 2.206–
2.209, the USPTO charges fees for
processing and other services related to
patents, trademarks, and information
products. Customers may submit
payments to the USPTO by several
methods, including credit card, deposit
account, electronic funds transfer (EFT),
and paper check transactions. The
public uses this collection to pay patent
and trademark fees by credit card, to
establish and manage USPTO deposit
accounts, to set up a user profile for EFT
transactions, and to request refunds.
The USPTO is developing a pilot
program that will allow customers to
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
access and manage their financial
activity online by creating a Financial
Profile through the USPTO Web site.
The Financial Profiles are being added
to this collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households, businesses or other forprofits, and not-for-profit institutions.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker,
(202) 395–3897.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
any of the following methods:
• E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0043 copy request’’ in
the subject line of the message.
• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the
attention of Susan Fawcett.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Customer Information Services
Group, Public Information Services
Division, U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent on
or before August 27, 2007 to David
Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room
10202, New Executive Office Building,
725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20503.
Dated: July 20, 2007.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Customer Information
Services Group, Public Information Services
Division.
[FR Doc. E7–14542 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Notice of Funding Availability for
Special Assistance to Local
Educational Agencies (LEAs) in the
Vicinity of a United States Service
Academy
Department of Defense.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of $5 million in assistance of
Local Educational Agencies (LEAs). The
Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) is
authorized by section 3310 of Pub. L.
110–28, to provide up to $5 million in
assistance to LEAs. Awards of up to $1.5
million per Applicant may be provided
under this Notice to assist LEAs in the
vicinity of a United States Service
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 144 (Friday, July 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41294-41298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14584]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XB17
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Central California Seabird Research Operations
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed authorization for an incidental take
authorization; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request from the PRBO Conservation
Science (PRBO) for an authorization to take California sea lions,
Pacific harbor seals, northern elephant seals and Steller sea lions, by
harassment, incidental to central California seabird research
operations on Southeast Farallon Island, Ano Nuevo Island, and Point
Reyes National Seashore (NS). Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on its proposal to issue an
authorization to PRBO to incidentally take, by harassment, small
numbers of these species of pinnipeds during the next 12 months.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than August
27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the application and draft Environmental
Assessment (EA) should be addressed to P. Michael Payne, Chief,
Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225, or by telephoning the contact listed
here. The mailbox address for providing e-mail comments is PR1.0648-
XB17@noaa.gov. Comments sent via e-mail, including all attachments,
must not exceed a 10-megabyte file size. A copy of the application,
NMFS' draft environmental assessment (EA), and other related documents
may be obtained by writing to this address or by telephoning one of the
contacts listed here (see FOR
[[Page 41295]]
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) and is also available at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Guan, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, ext
137.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
An authorization shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking
will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s) and will not
have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species
or stock(s) for subsistence uses and that the permissible methods of
taking and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and
reporting of such taking are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible
impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ''...an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of
small numbers of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the
comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny issuance of the
authorization.
Summary of Request
On December 15, 2006, PRBO submitted an application to NMFS
requesting an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) for the
possible harassment of small numbers of California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus), Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi),
northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris), and Steller sea
lions (Eumetopias jubatus) incidental to central
California seabird research operations on Southeast Farallon
Island, Ano Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes NS. A detailed description of
the proposed activity is presented below:
Southeast Farallon Island
The Southeast Farallon Island is located 28 miles (45 km) offshore
of San Francisco, California (37[deg] 41'55''N, 123[deg] 00'10''W).
Seabird research activities on the Southeast Farallon Island would
involve observational and ``hands on'' ecological studies of breeding
seabirds. Occasionally researchers may travel to coastal areas of the
island to conduct observational seabird research where non breeding
marine mammals are present. These sorts of tasks include viewing
breeding seabirds from an observation blind or censusing shorebirds.
This activity usually involves one or two observers. Access to the
refuge involves landing in small, 14-18 ft (4.3 - 5.5 m) open
motorboats which are hoisted onto the island using a derrick system.
Research on the Southeast Farallon Island would be conducted year
round. Most intertidal areas of the island, where pinnipeds are
present, would be rarely visited in seabird research. Most potential
for incidental take will occur at the island's 2 landings, North
Landing and East Landing. These sites would be visited approximately 1
- 3 times per day by researchers. In both locations researchers would
not be approaching less than 50 ft (15 m) from any pinnipeds which may
be hauled out. Most visits to these areas would be brief (approximately
15 minutes), though seabird observers would be present from 2 - 5 hours
daily at North Landing from early April early August to conduct
observational studies on breeding Common Murres. Boat landings to re-
supply the field station, lasting 1 - 3 hours, would be conducted once
every 2 weeks at one of the these locations. Activities involve
launching of the boat with one operator, with 2 - 4 other researchers
assisting with the operations from land. At East Landing, the primary
landing site, all personnel assisting with the landing would stay on
the loading platform 30 ft (9 m) above the water. At North Landing,
loading operations would occur at the water level in the intertidal.
Ano Nuevo Island
Ano Nuevo Island is located 0.25 mi (0.4 km) offshore of Ano Nuevo
Point in San Mateo County, California (37[deg]06'N, 122[deg]20'W). All
seabird research work on the Ano Nuevo Island would be in
collaborations with Oikonos - Ecosystem Knowledge and through a
collaborative agreement with the California State Parks. Procedures
include accessing the island by a 12 ft (3.7 m) Zodiac boat. Non-
breeding pinnipeds may occasionally be present on the small beach in
the center of the island where the boat would be landed. Sea lions may
also occasionally be present near a small group of subterranean seabird
nest boxes on the island terrace. There are usually 2 - 3 researchers
involved in island visits.
Research on the Ano Nuevo Island would be conducted once per week
from April to August, and occasional intermittent visits would be made
during the rest of the year. A component of the seabird research
involves nesting habitat restoration and monitoring, which requires
sporadic visits from September to November, between the seabird
breeding season and the elephant seal pupping season. Most intertidal
areas of the island where marine mammals are present will not be
visited during seabird research, excepting the landing beach. Most
likely, marine mammal incidental take would occur at this location as
well as just north of this beach up on the island's terrace where a
small number of seabird nest boxes are located. The landing beach would
be visited upon arrival and departure during the weekly visit, and the
nest boxes would be checked once on the day of visit. In both locations
researchers would not approach less than 50 ft (15 m) away from any
pinnipeds which may be hauled out. Landings and visits to nest boxes
would be brief (approximately 15 minutes).
Point Reyes National Seashore
Point Reyes NS is located 40 miles (64 km) north of San Francisco
Bay, California. The National Park Service (NPS) conducts research,
resource management and routine maintenance services at Point Reyes NS.
Research along the seashore includes monitoring seabird breeding and
roosting colonies. Seabird monitoring usually would involve one or two
observers. Surveys
[[Page 41296]]
would be conducted in small, 14 - 22 ft (4.3 - 6.7 m) open motorboats
that survey along the shoreline. These activities could result in the
incidental harassment of pinnipeds. Additionally, NPS would also
conduct habitat restoration of the seashore, which would include
removal of non-native plants and restoration of coastal dune habitat.
Non-native plant removal would be timed to avoid the breeding seasons
of pinnipeds, however, on occasion non-breeding animals may be present
at various beaches throughout the year.
Description of the Marine Mammals Potentially Affected by the Activity
The marine mammals most likely to be found in the proposed seabird
research areas are the California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals,
Steller sea lions, and northern elephant seals. General information of
these species can be found in Caretta et al. (2007), which is available
at the following URL: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/po2006.pdf.
Refer to that document for information on these species. Additional
information on these species is presented below.
Northern Elephant Seal
The northern elephant breeding population is distributed from
central Baja California, Mexico, to the Point Reyes Peninsula in
northern California. Along this coastline there are 13 major breeding
colonies. The northern elephant seal was exploited for its oil during
the 18th and 19th centuries and by 1900 the population was reduced to
20-30 individuals on Guadalupe Island (Hoelzel et al., 1993; Hoelzel,
1999). As a result of this bottleneck the genetic diversity found in
this species is extremely low (Hoelzel, 1999). The recent formation of
most rookeries indicates that there is no genetic differentiation among
populations. Although movement and genetic exchange occurs among
colonies, most seals return to their natal site to breed (Huber et al.,
1991). Recolonization of their former breeding range progressed north
from the San Benito and Guadalupe Islands off Baja California to the
most recent northernmost breeding site at Point Reyes Headlands. In the
last three decades, annual pup production has increased at the rate of
9.43 + or -0.51 percent per year in California and 5.19 + or -0.33
percent per year over the entire range (Barlow et al., 1993). A
complete population count of elephant seals is not possible because all
age classes are not ashore at the same time. Elephant seal population
size is usually estimated by counting the number of pups produced and
multiplying by the inverse of the expected ratio of pups to total
animals (McCann, 1985). Stewart et al. (1994) used McCann's multiplier
of 4.5 to extrapolate from 28,164 pups to a population estimate of
127,000 elephant seals in the U.S. and Mexico in 1991. The multiplier
of 4.5 was based on a stable population. Boveng (1988) and Barlow et
al. (1993) argue that a multiplier of 3.5 is more appropriate for a
rapidly growing population such as the California stock of elephant
seals. Based on the estimated 28,450 pups born in California and this
3.5 multiplier, the California stock was approximately 101,000 in 2001
(Carretta et al., 2002). At Point Reyes, the population grew at 32.8
percent per year between 1988 and 1997 (Sydeman and Allen, 1999) and
around 10 percent per year since 2000 (S. Allen, unpubl. data), and in
2006 around 700 pups were born at three primary breeding areas. The
population on the Farallon Islands has declined by 3.4 percent per year
since 1983, and in recent years numbers have fluctuated between 100 and
200 pups (W. Sydeman, D. Lee, unpubl. data).
Elephant seals congregate in central California to breed from late
November to March. Females typically give birth to a single pup and
attend the pup for up to 6 weeks. Breeding occurs after the pup is
weaned by attending males. After breeding, seals migrate to the Gulf of
Alaska or deeper waters in the eastern Pacific. Adult females and
juveniles return to terrestrial colonies to molt in April and May, and
males return in June and July to molt, remaining onshore for around 3
weeks.
Pacific Harbor Seal
Harbor seals are one of the most widely distributed northern
hemisphere pinnipeds and are found in coastal, estuarine and some times
fresh water of both the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific Oceans. There is
considerable regional genetic differentiation between harbor seal
populations as they are generally limited in migratory movements. Under
the MMPA, six stocks of Pacific harbor seals are identified within the
U.S. waters (Angliss and Lodge, 2004; Carretta et al., 2006). Only the
California stock of harbor seal is found in the proposed project area,
and its abundance is estimated to be 34,233 (Carretta et al., 2006).
There is some question whether the San Francisco Bay population may be
a separate stock based on genetic analyses (D. German, Sonoma State
University, pers. com.). At Point Reyes, the harbor seal population is
estimated to be 7,524 for the molt season based on a correction factor
of 1.65 (Lowry et al., 2005; Manna et al., 2006).
In central California, harbor seals breed annually from March
through May and molt in June and July. Females give birth to a single
pup and attend the pup for around 30 days, at which time they wean
pups. Mating occurs in the water around the time of weaning. Harbor
seals are resident year round at terrestrial colonies, however,
juveniles may disperse to other colonies ranging up to 500 km (311 mi).
Individual adult seals may also migrate widely from breeding colonies.
California Sea Lion
California sea lions range from southern Mexico up to British
Columbia and breed almost entirely on islands in southern California,
Western Baja California and the Gulf of California. In recent years,
California sea lions have begun to breed annually in small numbers at
Ano Nuevo Island and South Farallon Island, California. One abandoned
pup was found at Point Reyes NS at Wildcat Beach in 2003. This species
is separated into three recognized stocks based on three geographic
regions (U.S. stock, Western Baja stock, and the Gulf of California
stock; Lowry et al. 1992). Some movement has been documented between
these geographic stocks, but rookeries in the U.S. are widely separated
from major rookeries of western Baja California, Mexico (Barlow et al.,
1995). The U.S. stock of California sea lion is the only stock present
in the proposed research area. The California sea lion has the largest
population of any sea lion species and is the only sea lion whose
population is showing a healthy growth rate of 5 to 6.2 percent per
annum. Annual incidental takes in fisheries is approximately 915
individuals; however, the population is growing by 8.2 percent per year
and fishing mortality is declining (Barlow et al., 1995). Current U.S.
population estimates range from 237,000 to 244,000 (Carretta et al.,
2007).
California sea lions give birth in May through July and breeding
occurs in July and August. Females and pups are resident at breeding
colonies year round and males migrate north to feeding areas from
central California to British Columbia, Canada. During years of low
food availability (e.g., El Nino Southern Oscillation, or ENSO),
females and juveniles may also migrate north in search of prey; and in
some particularly poor years (1997 - 1998), there can be mass mortality
of pups at rookeries.
On the Farallon Islands California sea lions haul out in many
intertidal areas year round, fluctuating from several
[[Page 41297]]
hundred to several thousand animals. Breeding animals are concentrated
in areas where researchers would not visit (PRBO, unpublished data).
California sea lions at Point Reyes haul out at only a couple
locations, but will occur on human structures such as boat ramps. The
annual population averages around 300 - 500 during the fall through
spring months, although on occasion, several thousand sea lions can
arrive depending upon local prey resources (S. Allen, unpublished
data).
Steller Sea Lion
Steller sea lions breed from the Kuril Islands and Okhotsk Sea
through the Aleutian Islands and the Gulf of Alaska, and south to
central California (Merrick et al., 1987). Two separate stocks are
recognized within U.S. waters: an eastern U.S. stock that includes
animals east of Cape Suckling, Alaska (144[deg] W), and a western U.S.
stock that includes animals' west of Cape Suckling. In 1990, the
Steller sea lion was listed as a threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA), and the western stock was listed as
endangered in 1997.
The eastern stock of Steller sea lions breeds on rookeries located
in southeast Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon, and California
(including the proposed research area). Steller sea lions give birth in
May through July and breeding occurs a couple of weeks after birth.
Non-reproductive animals congregate at a few haul out sites, including
at Ano Nuevo and Point Reyes Headland. Pups are weaned during the
winter and spring of the following year. On the Farallon and Ano Nuevo
Islands, Steller sea lion breeding colonies are located in closed areas
where researchers never visited, eliminating any risk of disturbing
breeding animals.
Count of pups on rookeries conducted near the end of the birthing
season are nearly complete counts of pup production. Using the most
recent 2005 pup counts available by region from aerial surveys across
the range of the eastern stock, the total population of the eastern
stock of Steller sea lions is estimated to be 47,885. This is based on
multiplying the total number of pups counted in southeast Alaska
(5,519), British Columbia (3,281), Oregon (1,128), and California (713)
by 4.5 (Angliss and Outlaw, 2007). Because the eastern stock of Steller
sea lions is increasing within most of its range, using the 4.5
multiplier is a reasonable approach to estimating abundance from pup
counts (Angliss and Outlaw, 2007).
Steller sea lion numbers in California, especially in southern and
central California, have declined from historic numbers. Counts in
California between 1927 and 1947 ranged between 5,000 and 7,000 non-
pups with no apparent trend, but have subsequently declined by over 50
percent, remaining between 1,500 and 2,000 non-pups during 1980-2001.
Limited information suggests that counts in northern California appear
to be stable (NMFS, 1995). At Ano Nuevo Island, a steady decline in
ground counts started around 1970, resulting in an 85 percent reduction
in the breeding population by 1987 (LeBoeuf et al., 1991). In vertical
aerial photographic counts conducted at Ano Nuevo, pups declined at a
rate of 9.9 percent from 1990 to 1993, while non-pups declined at a
rate of 31.5 percent over the same time period (Westlake et al., 1997).
Pup counts at Ano Nuevo have been steadily declining at about 5 percent
annually since 1990 (W. Perryman, NMFS-SWFSC, pers. comm.). On
Southeast Farallon Island, the abundance of Steller sea lion females
declined an average of 3.6 percent per year from 1974 to 1997 (Sydeman
and Allen, 1999). Pup counts on the Farallon Islands have generally
varied from 5 - 15 (Hastings and Sydeman, 2002,; PRBO unpublished
data). The most recent pup counts at Ano Nuevo Island and the
Farallones are 349 in 2000 and 287 in 2001 (M. Lowry, NMFS-SWFSC, pers.
comm.). Pups have not been born at Point Reyes Headland since the 1970s
and Steller sea lions are seen in very low numbers there currently (S.
Allen, unpubl. data).
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals and Their Habitat
The only anticipated impacts would be temporary disturbances caused
by the appearance of researchers near the pinnipeds. The potential
disturbance might alter pinniped behavior and cause animals to flush
from the area. Animals may return to the same site once researchers
have left or go to an alternate haul out site, which usually occurs
within 30 minutes (Allen et al., 1985). Long term effects of this
disturbance are unlikely, as very few breeding animals will be present
in the vicinity of the proposed seabird research areas. The proposed
seabird research would not result in the physical altering of marine
mammal habitat. No marine mammal habitat is expected to be affected by
the proposed action. No marine mammal critical habitat is found within
the proposed research area.
There is no subsistence harvest of marine mammals in the proposed
research area, therefore, there will be no impact of the activity on
the availability of the species or stocks of marine mammals for
subsistence uses.
Number of Marine Mammals Expected to Be Taken
It is expected that approximately 2,422 California sea lions, 500
harbor seals, 273 northern elephant seals, and 14 Steller sea lions
could be potentially affected by Level B harassment. This estimate is
based on previous research experiences, with the same activities
conducted in the proposed research area, and on marine mammal research
activities in these areas. These incidental harassment take numbers
represent approximately 1 percent of the U.S. stock of California sea
lion, 1.5 percent of the California stock of Pacific harbor seal, 0.3
percent of the California breeding stock of northern elephant seal, and
0.03 percent of the eastern U.S. stock of Steller sea lion. All of the
potential takes are expected to be Level B behavioral harassment only.
No injury or mortality to pinnipeds is expected or requested.
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting
The researchers would take all possible measures to reduce marine
mammal disturbance for the activities described above. Researchers
would keep their voices hushed and bodies low in the visual presence of
pinnipeds. Seabird observations at North Landing on Southeast Farallon
Island would be conducted in an observation blind where researchers are
shielded from the view of hauled out pinnipeds. Beach landings on Ano
Nuevo Island would only occur after any pinnipeds that might be present
on the landing beach have entered the water. Ano Nuevo Island
researchers accessing seabird nest boxes would crawl slowly if
pinnipeds are within view.
Visits to intertidal areas of Southeast Farallon Island during
research activities would be coordinated to reduce potential take. All
research goals on Ano Nuevo Island would be coordinated to minimize the
necessary number of trips to the island. Once on Ano Nuevo Island,
researchers would coordinate monitoring schedules so areas near any
pinnipeds would be accessed only once per visit. The lead biologist
would always serve as an observer to evaluate incidental take and halt
any research activities should the potential for incidental take be too
great.
Researchers would take notes of sea lions and seals observed within
the proposed research area during studies. The notes would provide
dates, time, tidal height, species, numbers of sea lions and seals
present, and any disturbances. PRBO would submit a final report,
including these notes, to
[[Page 41298]]
NMFS within 90 days after the expiration of the IHA, if it is issued.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NMFS has prepared a draft EA for public review and comment (see
ADDRESSES), that describes the impact on the human environment that
would result from implementation of this action. NMFS has concluded,
preliminarily, that no significant impact on the human environment
would result.
ESA
NMFS is conducting a Section 7 consultation under the ESA to make a
determination whether the proposed research project would be likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of the eastern U.S. stock of Steller
sea lions.
Preliminary Determinations
For the reasons discussed in this document and in the identified
supporting documents, NMFS has preliminarily determined that the impact
of seabird research on Southeast Farallon Island, Ano Nuevo Island, and
Point Reyes NS would result, at worst, in the Level B harassment of
small numbers of California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals, northern
elephant seals, and Steller sea lions hauled out in the vicinity of the
proposed research area. While behavioral modifications, including
temporarily vacating the area during the survey period, may be made by
these species to avoid the resultant visual disturbance, the
availability of alternate areas within these areas and haul-out sites
has led NMFS to preliminarily determine that this action will have a
negligible impact on California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals,
northern elephant seals, and Steller sea lions.
In addition, no take by Level A harassment (injury) or death is
anticipated and harassment takes should be at the lowest level
practicable due to incorporation of the mitigation measures described
in this document.
Proposed Authorization
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to PRBO for the potential harassment
of small numbers of California sea lions, harbor seals, northern
elephant seals, and Steller sea lions incidental to conducting of
seabird research on Southeast Farallon Island, Ano Nuevo Island, and
Point Reyes NS, provided the previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements are incorporated.
NMFS requests interested persons to submit comments, information,
and suggestions concerning this request (see ADDRESSES).
Dated: July 23, 2007.
Helen Golde,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-14584 Filed 7-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S