Environmental Impact Statement; Cole County, MO, 41385-41386 [E7-14572]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
working side (i.e., equipment work area
and travel lane) would typically be 75
feet wide and partially located outside
the existing maintained right-of-way.
Following construction, up to a 50-footwide permanent right-of-way in
addition to the existing permanent rightof-way will be maintained for operation
of the pipeline.
Dated: July 23, 2007.
David Brown,
Director, Office of Environmental Policy,
Bureau of International Oceans, Environment
and Scientific Affairs, U.S. Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E7–14488 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Third Meeting, Special Committee 213
Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/
Synthetic Vision System, (EFVS/SVS)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special
Committee 213, Enhanced Flight Vision
Systems/Synthetic Vision System,
(EFVS/SVS).
AGENCY:
The FAA is issuing this notice
to advise the public of a meeting of
RTCA Special Committee 213,
Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/
Synthetic Vision System, (EFVS/SVS).
DATES: The meeting will be held August
21–23, 2007 from 9 a.m.–5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
Hilton Gardens 1801 East Valley Road,
Renton, WA 98055.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036;
telephone (202) 833–9339; fax (202)
833–9434; Web site https://www.rtca.org
for directions. Hilton Gardens:
telephone (425) 430–1414.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is
hereby given for a Special Committee
213 meeting. The agenda will include:
• August 21:
• Opening Plenary Session (Welcome,
Introductions, and Agenda Review).
• Review SC–213 Objectives, Action
Items, and SC–213 Web site content.
• Review initial reports from WG 1,
and WG 2.
• Presentations.
• Afternoon: WG 1 and WG 2
meetings.
• August 22:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
• WG 1 and WG 2 meeting.
• August 23:
• Morning: Work Group meetings and
development of actions items.
• Afternoon: Plenary.
• Review action items and
• Define next steps for continued
MASPS development.
• Closing Plenary Session (Other
Business, Establish date and time for
next meeting, Adjourn).
Attendance is open to the interested
public but limited to space availability.
With the approval of the chairmen,
members of the public may present oral
statements at the meeting. Persons
wishing to present statements or obtain
information should contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 23,
2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07–3677 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement; Cole
County, MO
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this
notice to advise the public that an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
will be prepared for proposed
improvements to U.S. 50/U.S. 63, (Rex
Whitton Expressway), in Jefferson City,
Cole County, Missouri.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Peggy Casey, Environmental Projects
Engineer, FHWA Division Office, 3220
West Edgewood, Suite H, Jefferson City,
MO 65109, Telephone: (573) 638–2620
or Mr. Kevin Keith, Chief Engineer,
Missouri Department of Transportation,
P.O. Box 270, Jefferson City, MO 65102,
Telephone: (573) 751–2803.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
FHWA, in cooperation with the
Missouri Department of Transportation
(MoDOT), will prepare an EIS for a
proposal to upgrade the existing U.S.
50/U.S. 63 (Rex Whitton Expressway)
facility. MoDOT completed a Problem
Definition Study for the study area in
April 2006. The study identified issues
and potential concepts to address the
issues.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41385
The proposed action will accomplish
several goals: (1) Provide sufficient
roadway capacity and improve traffic
operations, (2) improve traffic safety, (3)
address geometric and structural
deficiencies, (4) and improve access to
major activity centers and encourage
development.
The proposed project study area is
defined as the area in Jefferson City
from just east of the U.S. 50/U.S. 54 Trilevel interchange to the Eastland Drive
interchange for an approximate length
of 3 miles; and from 300 feet south of
U.S. 50/U.S. 63 to McCarty Street on the
north. An additional area to the north of
McCarty will be studied to address
access to the Missouri State Prison
Redevelopment site. The width of the
study area varies from 400 to 800 feet.
Known potential impacts include
access changes, and residential,
commercial and institutional
acquisitions/relocations. Properties
eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places which are protected by
Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act of 1966 may also be
impacted. Other potential Section 4(f)
impacts are to the East Miller Park, the
Lincoln University Recreation Park, and
the Lincoln University Tennis Courts.
The Lincoln University Tennis Courts
are also protected by the Land and
Water Conservation Fund Act
requirements. A floodplain
development permit from the State
Emergency Management Agency may be
required.
It is anticipated that the following
will be invited to be participating
agencies on this project: The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the State Emergency
Management Agency, the Missouri
Department of Conservation, the
Missouri Department of Natural
Resources, and the State Historic
Preservation Office.
Alternatives under consideration
include: (1) No build, (2) build
alternatives, and (3) transportation
management options. The Problem
Definition Study looked at a number of
alternatives but made no
recommendation. The EIS will look at
the work done in this study as a starting
point and use this information in
developing and evaluating the
reasonable alternatives.
To date, preliminary coordination has
occurred with local officials and other
interested parties. A public meeting and
two stakeholder meetings were held
during the Problem Definition Study. As
part of the scoping process, an
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
41386
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
interagency coordination meeting will
be held August 14, 2007 with federal,
state, and local agencies. In addition,
public information meetings and further
meetings for community officials will be
held to solicit public and agency input
on the project coordination plan, the
purpose and need for the project, and
the reasonable range of alternatives. A
location public hearing will be held to
present the findings of the Draft EIS.
Public notice will be given announcing
the time and place of all public
meetings and the hearing. The Draft EIS
will be available for public and agency
review and comment prior to the public
hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action are
addressed and all significant issues are
identified, comments and suggestions
are invited from all interested parties.
Comments and questions concerning
this proposed action should be directed
to FHWA or MoDOT at the addresses
provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Issued on: July 19, 2007.
Peggy J. Casey,
Environmental Project Engineer, Jefferson
City.
[FR Doc. E7–14572 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35064]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Watco Companies, Inc., and Watco
Transportation Services, Inc.—
Continuance in Control Exemption—
Michigan Central Railway, LLC
Watco Companies, Inc. (Watco
Companies) and its wholly owned
subsidiary, Watco Transportation
Services, Inc. (Watco Transportation)
(collectively, Watco), both noncarriers,
jointly have filed a verified notice of
exemption to continue in control of
Michigan Central Railway, LLC
(Michigan Central), upon Michigan
Central’s becoming a Class II rail carrier
through its proposed acquisition and
operation of certain rail lines in
Michigan and Indiana. Michigan Central
will be controlled directly by Watco
Transportation, with a 67% membership
interest, and indirectly by Watco, while
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
(NSR) will have a noncontrolling 33%
membership interest.1
This transaction is related to a
petition for exemption for the
acquisition and operation of these rail
lines concurrently filed in STB Finance
Docket No. 35063, Michigan Central
Railway, LLC—Acquisition and
Operation Exemption—Lines of Norfolk
Southern Railway Company. In that
proceeding, Michigan Central seeks an
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from
the prior approval requirements of 49
U.S.C. 10901 to acquire and operate
some 299 miles of rail line owned and
operated by NSR, and some 85.5 miles
of trackage rights, in Michigan and
Indiana.2 In the proposed acquisition,
NSR will contribute these rails lines,
trackage rights, and related assets to
Michigan Central, subject to certain
traffic restrictions, in exchange for its
33% interest. Watco Transportation will
contribute over time $18 million in cash
and locomotives to Michigan Central in
exchange for its controlling 67%
interest.3
This transaction also is related to a
concurrently filed verified notice of
exemption in STB Finance Docket No.
35065, Norfolk Southern Railway
Company—Trackage Rights
Exemption—Michigan Central Railway,
LLC. There, Michigan Central has agreed
to grant limited local trackage rights to
NSR in Michigan and Indiana.
The parties intend to consummate the
transaction after the Board has issued a
final decision granting the petition for
exemption in STB Finance Docket No.
35063.
Watco currently controls 16 Class III
rail carriers: South Kansas and
Oklahoma Railroad Company, Palouse
River & Coulee City Railroad, Inc.,
Timber Rock Railroad, Inc., Stillwater
Central Railroad, Inc., Eastern Idaho
Railroad, Inc., Kansas & Oklahoma
Railroad, Inc., Pennsylvania
Southwestern Railroad, Inc., Great
1 Watco has filed a copy of the First Amended
and Restated Agreement into which Watco
Transportation, NSR, and Michigan Central will
enter in connection with the consummation of the
proposed control transaction and related
transactions referenced in this notice. The
agreement provides for the independent
management of Michigan Central, according to
Watco, under Watco’s control.
2 In STB Finance Docket No. 35063, Michigan
Central also has filed a petition to revoke the
otherwise applicable class exemption at 49 CFR
1150.31 for the acquisition and operation of rail
lines by a noncarrier and a proposed procedural
schedule.
3 A redacted version of the Transaction
Agreement by and among NSR, Michigan Central
and Watco Transportation was filed with the
petition for exemption in STB Finance Docket No.
35063. The full version of the Transaction
Agreement was concurrently filed under seal along
with a motion for protective order.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Northwest Railroad, Inc., Kaw River
Railroad, Inc., Mission Mountain
Railroad, Inc., Mississippi Southern
Railroad, Inc., Yellowstone Valley
Railroad, Inc., Louisiana Southern
Railroad, Inc., Arkansas Southern
Railroad, Inc., Alabama Southern
Railroad, Inc., and Vicksburg Southern
Railroad, Inc.4
Watco represents that: (1) The rail
lines to be acquired by Michigan Central
do not connect with any other railroads
in the Watco corporate family; (2) these
continuance in control is not part of a
series of anticipated transactions that
would connect these railroads with each
other or any other railroad in the Watco
corporate family; and (3) the transaction
does not involve a Class I rail carrier.
Therefore, the transaction is exempt
from the prior approval requirements of
49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. Because the transaction
involves the control of one Class II and
one or more Class III rail carriers, the
exemption is subject to the labor
protection requirements of 49 U.S.C.
11326(b).
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions for stay must
be filed no later than August 3, 2007 (at
least 7 days before the exemption
becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35064, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be served on Karl Morell,
Of Counsel, Ball Janik, LLP, Suite 225,
1455 F Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at: https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: July 19, 2007.
4 A former Watco Class III railroad, the
Appalachian & Ohio Railroad, Inc., was acquired by
Four Rivers Transportation, Inc. See Four Rivers
Transportation, Inc.—Control Exemption—
Appalachian & Ohio Railroad, Inc., STB Finance
Docket No. 34856 (STB served May 23, 2006).
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 144 (Friday, July 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41385-41386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14572]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement; Cole County, MO
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an
environmental impact statement (EIS) will be prepared for proposed
improvements to U.S. 50/U.S. 63, (Rex Whitton Expressway), in Jefferson
City, Cole County, Missouri.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Peggy Casey, Environmental
Projects Engineer, FHWA Division Office, 3220 West Edgewood, Suite H,
Jefferson City, MO 65109, Telephone: (573) 638-2620 or Mr. Kevin Keith,
Chief Engineer, Missouri Department of Transportation, P.O. Box 270,
Jefferson City, MO 65102, Telephone: (573) 751-2803.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Missouri
Department of Transportation (MoDOT), will prepare an EIS for a
proposal to upgrade the existing U.S. 50/U.S. 63 (Rex Whitton
Expressway) facility. MoDOT completed a Problem Definition Study for
the study area in April 2006. The study identified issues and potential
concepts to address the issues.
The proposed action will accomplish several goals: (1) Provide
sufficient roadway capacity and improve traffic operations, (2) improve
traffic safety, (3) address geometric and structural deficiencies, (4)
and improve access to major activity centers and encourage development.
The proposed project study area is defined as the area in Jefferson
City from just east of the U.S. 50/U.S. 54 Tri-level interchange to the
Eastland Drive interchange for an approximate length of 3 miles; and
from 300 feet south of U.S. 50/U.S. 63 to McCarty Street on the north.
An additional area to the north of McCarty will be studied to address
access to the Missouri State Prison Redevelopment site. The width of
the study area varies from 400 to 800 feet.
Known potential impacts include access changes, and residential,
commercial and institutional acquisitions/relocations. Properties
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places which are
protected by Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of
1966 may also be impacted. Other potential Section 4(f) impacts are to
the East Miller Park, the Lincoln University Recreation Park, and the
Lincoln University Tennis Courts. The Lincoln University Tennis Courts
are also protected by the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act
requirements. A floodplain development permit from the State Emergency
Management Agency may be required.
It is anticipated that the following will be invited to be
participating agencies on this project: The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, the State Emergency Management Agency, the Missouri
Department of Conservation, the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources, and the State Historic Preservation Office.
Alternatives under consideration include: (1) No build, (2) build
alternatives, and (3) transportation management options. The Problem
Definition Study looked at a number of alternatives but made no
recommendation. The EIS will look at the work done in this study as a
starting point and use this information in developing and evaluating
the reasonable alternatives.
To date, preliminary coordination has occurred with local officials
and other interested parties. A public meeting and two stakeholder
meetings were held during the Problem Definition Study. As part of the
scoping process, an
[[Page 41386]]
interagency coordination meeting will be held August 14, 2007 with
federal, state, and local agencies. In addition, public information
meetings and further meetings for community officials will be held to
solicit public and agency input on the project coordination plan, the
purpose and need for the project, and the reasonable range of
alternatives. A location public hearing will be held to present the
findings of the Draft EIS. Public notice will be given announcing the
time and place of all public meetings and the hearing. The Draft EIS
will be available for public and agency review and comment prior to the
public hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed
action are addressed and all significant issues are identified,
comments and suggestions are invited from all interested parties.
Comments and questions concerning this proposed action should be
directed to FHWA or MoDOT at the addresses provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Issued on: July 19, 2007.
Peggy J. Casey,
Environmental Project Engineer, Jefferson City.
[FR Doc. E7-14572 Filed 7-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P