Approval of New Jersey's Title V Operating Permit Program Revision, 41025-41026 [E7-14483]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 143 / Thursday, July 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the race course.
(d) Effective period. This section will
enforced from 11:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on
August 4, 2007. If the race is postponed
due to weather, then the temporary
special local regulations will be
enforced during the same time period
the next day, August 5, 2007.
Dated: July 16, 2007.
Neil O. Buschman,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth
Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. E7–14401 Filed 7–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
40 CFR Part 70
[Docket No. EPA–R02–OAR–2006–0963,
FRL–8446–4]
Approval of New Jersey’s Title V
Operating Permit Program Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency is approving a revision to the
New Jersey Operating Permit Program
related to the permitting of stationary
sources subject to title V of the Clean
Air Act in the state of New Jersey. The
revision consists of amendments to
Subchapter 22 of Chapter 27 of Title 7
of the New Jersey Administrative Code,
‘‘Operating Permits.’’ The revision was
submitted to amend the definition,
permit application, and fees sections of
the Operating Permit Rule. The changes
add clarity to the rule and assure
adequate funding for New Jersey’s
Operating Permit Program. The
intended effect of this action is to
approve the program revision requested
by New Jersey to assure proper
implementation of the requirements of
title V of the CAA.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be
effective August 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS)
which replaces the Regional Materials
in EDOCKET (RME) docket system. The
15:42 Jul 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suilin Chan, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290
Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New
York 10007–1866, (212) 637–4019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What was included in New Jersey’s
submittal?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VerDate Aug<31>2005
new FDMS is located at https://
www.regulations.gov and the docket ID
for this action is EPA–R02–OAR–2006–
0963. All documents in the docket are
listed in the FDMS index. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in FDMS or in hard
copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs
Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New
York, New York 10007–1866. Copies of
the documents relevant to this action
are also available for public inspection
during normal business hours, by
appointment at the New Jersey
Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 401
East State Street, Trenton, New Jersey
08625.
On October 4, 2006, New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection
(NJDEP) submitted to EPA a request to
revise its Operating Permits Rule. The
revisions consisted of amendments to
sections 22.1, 22.3, 22.4, 22.6, 22.10,
and 22.31 of the Operating Permits Rule
codified at Title 7 of the New Jersey
Administrative Code, Chapter 27,
Subchapter 22. These revisions were
adopted by the State on May 1, 2006
(inadvertently listed June 9, 2006 as the
adoption date in the proposal) and
became effective on June 19, 2006.
On March 20, 2007 (72 FR 13059),
EPA proposed to approve the revised
Subchapter 22 as part of New Jersey’s
Operating Permits Rule. For a detailed
discussion on the content of the
revisions to New Jersey’s rule, the
reader is referred to EPA’s proposed
rulemaking action.
II. What comments did EPA receive in
response to its proposal?
In response to EPA’s March 20, 2007,
proposed rulemaking action, EPA
received no comments.
III. What is EPA’s conclusion?
EPA has evaluated New Jersey’s
submittal for consistency with the Act,
EPA regulations, and EPA policy. EPA
has determined that the revisions to
Subchapter 22, New Jersey’s Operating
Permits Rule meet title V of the CAA
and its implementing regulations
codified at Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, part 70. Therefore,
EPA is approving the subject revisions.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41025
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Act. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
In reviewing State Operating Permit
Programs submitted pursuant to title V
of the Clean Air Act, EPA will approve
such regulations provided that they
meet the requirements of the Clean Air
Act and EPA’s regulations codified at 40
CFR part 70. In this context, in the
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
41026
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 143 / Thursday, July 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove such regulations for
failure to use VCS. It would, thus, be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews such regulations,
to use VCS in place of a State regulation
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Jul 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 24, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
Dated: July 8, 2007.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
Part 70, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 70—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Appendix A to part 70 is amended
by adding paragraph (d) to the entry for
New Jersey to read as follows:
I
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval
Status of State and Local Operating
Permit Programs
*
*
*
*
*
New Jersey
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
*
*
*
*
(d) The New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection submitted
program revisions on October 4, 2006;
approval effective August 27, 2007.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–14483 Filed 7–25–07; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 143 (Thursday, July 26, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41025-41026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14483]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 70
[Docket No. EPA-R02-OAR-2006-0963, FRL-8446-4]
Approval of New Jersey's Title V Operating Permit Program
Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is approving a revision to
the New Jersey Operating Permit Program related to the permitting of
stationary sources subject to title V of the Clean Air Act in the state
of New Jersey. The revision consists of amendments to Subchapter 22 of
Chapter 27 of Title 7 of the New Jersey Administrative Code,
``Operating Permits.'' The revision was submitted to amend the
definition, permit application, and fees sections of the Operating
Permit Rule. The changes add clarity to the rule and assure adequate
funding for New Jersey's Operating Permit Program. The intended effect
of this action is to approve the program revision requested by New
Jersey to assure proper implementation of the requirements of title V
of the CAA.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be effective August 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under the
Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) which replaces the Regional
Materials in EDOCKET (RME) docket system. The new FDMS is located at
https://www.regulations.gov and the docket ID for this action is EPA-
R02-OAR-2006-0963. All documents in the docket are listed in the FDMS
index. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in FDMS or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor,
New York, New York 10007-1866. Copies of the documents relevant to this
action are also available for public inspection during normal business
hours, by appointment at the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 401 East State Street, Trenton,
New Jersey 08625.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suilin Chan, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-4019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What was included in New Jersey's submittal?
On October 4, 2006, New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection (NJDEP) submitted to EPA a request to revise its Operating
Permits Rule. The revisions consisted of amendments to sections 22.1,
22.3, 22.4, 22.6, 22.10, and 22.31 of the Operating Permits Rule
codified at Title 7 of the New Jersey Administrative Code, Chapter 27,
Subchapter 22. These revisions were adopted by the State on May 1, 2006
(inadvertently listed June 9, 2006 as the adoption date in the
proposal) and became effective on June 19, 2006.
On March 20, 2007 (72 FR 13059), EPA proposed to approve the
revised Subchapter 22 as part of New Jersey's Operating Permits Rule.
For a detailed discussion on the content of the revisions to New
Jersey's rule, the reader is referred to EPA's proposed rulemaking
action.
II. What comments did EPA receive in response to its proposal?
In response to EPA's March 20, 2007, proposed rulemaking action,
EPA received no comments.
III. What is EPA's conclusion?
EPA has evaluated New Jersey's submittal for consistency with the
Act, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. EPA has determined that the
revisions to Subchapter 22, New Jersey's Operating Permits Rule meet
title V of the CAA and its implementing regulations codified at Title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 70. Therefore, EPA is
approving the subject revisions.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Act.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing State Operating Permit Programs submitted pursuant to
title V of the Clean Air Act, EPA will approve such regulations
provided that they meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA's
regulations codified at 40 CFR part 70. In this context, in the
[[Page 41026]]
absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary
consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove such
regulations for failure to use VCS. It would, thus, be inconsistent
with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews such regulations, to use
VCS in place of a State regulation that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 24, 2007. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 8, 2007.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
0
Part 70, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 70--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Appendix A to part 70 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to the
entry for New Jersey to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permit Programs
* * * * *
New Jersey
* * * * *
(d) The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection submitted
program revisions on October 4, 2006; approval effective August 27,
2007.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-14483 Filed 7-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P