Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 14/27, 41046-41047 [E7-14450]
Download as PDF
41046
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 143 / Thursday, July 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the publication of the
proposed regulations (REG–149036–04),
which was the subject of FR Doc. E7–
12082, is corrected as follows:
1. On page 34200, column 1, in the
preamble, under the caption SUMMARY:,
lines 4 and 5, the language ‘‘and the Tax
Relief and Health Care Act of 2006. The
proposed regulations affect’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘the Tax Relief and Health Care
Act of 2006, and the Small Business and
Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007. The
proposed regulations affect’’.
2. On page 34200, column 2, in the
preamble, under the paragraph heading
‘‘Background’’, line 8, the language
‘‘Law 110–28 (121 Stat. 112, 200),’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘Law 110–28 (121
Stat. 190, 200),’’.
LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E7–14397 Filed 7–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
RIN 0648–AT87
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and Reef
Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;
Amendment 14/27
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of availability of
fishery management plan amendment;
request for comments.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
(Council) has submitted a joint
Amendment 14 to the Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) for the Shrimp
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and
Amendment 27 to the FMP for the Reef
Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico for
review, approval, and implementation
by NMFS. Amendment 14/27 proposes
actions to reduce the red snapper catch,
bycatch, and discard mortality in the
directed commercial and recreational
fisheries and the shrimp fishery. The
intended effect of joint Amendment 14/
27 is to end overfishing for red snapper
between 2009 and 2010 and rebuild the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:44 Jul 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
stock by 2032 in compliance with the
red snapper rebuilding plan.
DATES: Written comments must be
received no later than 5 p.m., eastern
time, on September 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: 0648–AT87.NOA27–
14@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line
the following document identifier:
0648–AT87–NOA27–14.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Peter Hood, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
• Fax: 727–824–5308, Attention:
Peter Hood.
Copies of joint Amendment 14/27,
which includes an Environmental
Impact Statement, a Regulatory Impact
Review, and an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, are available in
electronic format from the Council’s
web site at https://www.gulfcouncil.org,
or by contacting the Council at 2203
North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa,
FL, 33607; phone: 813–348–1630; fax:
813–348–1711; e-mail:
gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Peter Hood, 727–824–5305; fax 727–
824–5308; e-mail: peter.hood@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) requires each
Regional Fishery Management Council
to submit any fishery management plan
or amendment to NMFS for review and
approval, disapproval, or partial
approval. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
also requires that NMFS, upon receiving
a plan or amendment, publish an
announcement in the Federal Register
notifying the public that the plan or
amendment is available for review and
comment.
Elements of Amendment 14/27
constitute a revised rebuilding plan that
has at least a 50–percent probability of
rebuilding the red snapper stock by
2032. Proposed actions focus around a
reduction in red snapper total allowable
catch to 5 million lb (2.3 million kg).
This would result in a commercial quota
of 2.55 million lb (1.16 million kg) and
a recreational quota of 2.45 million lb
(1.11 million kg). Recreational bag limits
would be reduced from four fish to two
fish; the bag limit for captain and crew
of for-hire vessels would be set at zero.
The commercial minimum size limit
would be reduced to 13 inches (33 cm)
total length with the intent of reducing
regulatory discards. To reduce discard
mortality in the directed fisheries,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Amendment 14/27 proposes an action to
require the use of venting tools,
dehooking devices, and non-stainless
steel circle hooks (when using natural
baits) for all reef fish fishery sectors. In
addition, the amendment would
establish a target reduction goal for
shrimp trawl bycatch mortality on red
snapper, establish options for time-area
closures for the shrimp fishery that
would maintain the target reduction
goal, and establish a framework
whereby NMFS could implement such
closures in a timely fashion.
Length of the recreational fishing
season will be determined by a number
of factors. The proposed two-fish bag
limit alone would allow a June 1
through September 15 (107 days)
recreational fishing season. In addition
to the two-fish bag limit, constraining
the captain and crew of for-hire vessels
to a zero-fish bag limit would allow the
fishing season to be extended through
the end of September (122 days). Based
on extensive public comment, the
Council chose to assume a 10–percent
reduction in post-hurricane fishing
effort and landings when evaluating
recreational management measures.
Application of this assumption, along
with implementation of the two-fish bag
limit and the zero-fish captain and crew
limit of for-hire vessels, would allow the
recreational fishing season to extend
from May 15 through October 15 (154
days). This assumption is controversial
because although preliminary data
suggest some declines have occurred
since the 2005 hurricane season, the
magnitude of reductions varies- by
fishing sector, is often less than 10
percent, and in some cases effort or
landings have increased. Further, it is
unknown how long post-hurricane
reductions in landings and fishing effort
may continue as the fisheries recover.
Therefore, NMFS is specifically
requesting comments on the assumed
10–percent reduction in effort and
landings as proposed in Amendment
27/14, which would affect the
designation of the length of the
recreational fishing season established
by this rule.
A proposed rule that would
implement measures outlined in joint
Amendment 14/27 has been received
from the Council. In accordance with
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS is
evaluating the proposed rule to
determine whether it is consistent with
the FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
and other applicable law. If that
determination is affirmative, NMFS will
publish the proposed rule in the Federal
Register for public review and
comment.
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 143 / Thursday, July 26, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Comments received by September 24,
2007, whether specifically directed to
the amendment or the proposed rule,
will be considered by NMFS in its
decision to approve, disapprove, or
partially approve the amendment.
Comments received after that date will
not be considered by NMFS in this
decision. All comments received by
NMFS on the amendment or the
proposed rule during their respective
comment periods will be addressed in
the final rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: July 23, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–14450 Filed 7–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
RIN 0648–AV70
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Northeast
Region Standardized Bycatch
Reporting Methodology Omnibus
Amendment
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed fishery management plan
amendment; request for comments.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the
Mid-Atlantic and New England Fishery
Management Councils (Councils) have
submitted an Omnibus Amendment to
the Fishery Management Plans (FMPs)
of the Northeast Region to establish a
Standardized Bycatch Reporting
Methodology (SBRM), incorporating a
draft Environmental Assessment (EA)
and preliminary Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR), for review by the
Secretary of Commerce, and is
requesting comments from the public.
The SBRM Amendment would
establish an SBRM for all 13 Northeast
Region FMPs, as required under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act). The proposed
measures include: Bycatch reporting
and monitoring mechanisms; analytical
techniques and allocation of at-sea
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:39 Jul 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
fisheries observers; an SBRM
performance standard; a review and
reporting process; framework
adjustment and annual specifications
provisions; a prioritization process; and
provisions for industry-funded
observers and observer set-aside
programs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail:
SBRM.Amend.NOA@noaa.gov. Include
in the subject line the following
identifier: ‘‘Comments on the SBRM
Omnibus Amendment.’’
• Federal e-rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Northeast
Regional Office, One Blackburn Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside
of the envelope: ‘‘Comments on the
SBRM Omnibus Amendment.’’
• Fax: (978) 281–9135
Copies of the SBRM Amendment, and
of the draft Environmental Assessment
and preliminary Regulatory Impact
Review (EA/RIR), are available from
Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director,
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Council, Room 2115, Federal Building,
300 South New Street, Dover, DE
19901–6790; and from Paul J. Howard,
Executive Director, New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Newburyport, MA 01950. The
EA/RIR is also accessible via the
Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Pentony, Senior Fishery Policy
Analyst, 978–281–9283.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that
each Regional Fishery Management
Council submit any FMP amendment it
prepares to NMFS for review and
approval, disapproval, or partial
approval. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
also requires that NMFS, upon receiving
an FMP amendment, immediately
publish notification in the Federal
Register that the amendment is
available for public review and
comment. If approved by NMFS, this
amendment would establish a
comprehensive SBRM that applies to all
Northeast Region FMPs developed by
either the Mid-Atlantic or New England
Councils. The amendment would also
effect an administrative change to the
regulations on framework adjustments.
Background
Section 303(a)(11) of the MagnusonStevens Act requires that all FMPs
‘‘establish a standardized reporting
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41047
methodology to assess the amount and
type of bycatch occurring in the
fishery.’’ In 2004, several conservation
organizations challenged the approval of
two major amendments to Northeast
Region FMPs. In ruling on these suits,
the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia found that the FMPs did not
clearly establish an SBRM as required
under this section and remanded the
amendments back to the agency to fully
develop and establish the required
SBRM. In particular, the Court found
that the amendments (1) failed to fully
evaluate reporting methodologies to
assess bycatch, (2) did not mandate an
SBRM, and (3) failed to respond to
potentially important scientific
evidence.
In response, the Councils, working
closely with NMFS, undertook
development of a remedy that would
address all Northeast Region FMPs. In
January 2006, development began on the
Northeast Region Omnibus SBRM
Amendment. This amendment covers 13
FMPs, 39 managed species, and 14 types
of fishing gear. The purpose of the
amendment is to: Explain the methods
and processes by which bycatch is
currently monitored and assessed for
Northeast Region fisheries; determine
whether these methods and processes
need to be modified and/or
supplemented; establish standards of
precision for bycatch estimation for all
Northeast Region fisheries; and, thereby,
document the SBRM established for all
fisheries managed through the FMPs of
the Northeast Region. The amendment
also responds to the ‘‘potentially
important scientific evidence’’ cited by
the Court in the two decisions
referenced above.
The Northeast Region SBRM
Amendment would establish an SBRM
comprised of seven elements: (1) The
methods by which data and information
on discards are collected and obtained;
(2) the methods by which the data
obtained through the mechanisms
identified in element 1 are analyzed and
utilized to determine the appropriate
allocation of at-sea observers; (3) a
performance measure by which the
effectiveness of the Northeast Region
SBRM can be measured, tracked, and
utilized to effectively allocate the
appropriate number of observer sea
days; (4) a process to provide the
Councils with periodic reports on
discards occurring in Northeast Region
fisheries and on the effectiveness of the
SBRM; (5) a measure to enable the
Councils to make changes to the SBRM
through framework adjustments and/or
annual specification packages rather
than full FMP amendments; (6) a
process to provide the Councils, and the
E:\FR\FM\26JYP1.SGM
26JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 143 (Thursday, July 26, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41046-41047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14450]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
RIN 0648-AT87
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf
of Mexico; Amendment 14/27
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of availability of fishery management plan
amendment; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council
(Council) has submitted a joint Amendment 14 to the Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and Amendment
27 to the FMP for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico for
review, approval, and implementation by NMFS. Amendment 14/27 proposes
actions to reduce the red snapper catch, bycatch, and discard mortality
in the directed commercial and recreational fisheries and the shrimp
fishery. The intended effect of joint Amendment 14/27 is to end
overfishing for red snapper between 2009 and 2010 and rebuild the stock
by 2032 in compliance with the red snapper rebuilding plan.
DATES: Written comments must be received no later than 5 p.m., eastern
time, on September 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
E-mail: 0648-AT87.NOA27-14@noaa.gov. Include in the
subject line the following document identifier: 0648-AT87-NOA27-14.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Peter Hood, Southeast Regional Office, NMFS, 263
13\th\ Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Fax: 727-824-5308, Attention: Peter Hood.
Copies of joint Amendment 14/27, which includes an Environmental
Impact Statement, a Regulatory Impact Review, and an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, are available in electronic format from the
Council's web site at https://www.gulfcouncil.org, or by contacting the
Council at 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa, FL, 33607; phone:
813-348-1630; fax: 813-348-1711; e-mail: gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Peter Hood, 727-824-5305; fax
727-824-5308; e-mail: peter.hood@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) requires each Regional
Fishery Management Council to submit any fishery management plan or
amendment to NMFS for review and approval, disapproval, or partial
approval. The Magnuson-Stevens Act also requires that NMFS, upon
receiving a plan or amendment, publish an announcement in the Federal
Register notifying the public that the plan or amendment is available
for review and comment.
Elements of Amendment 14/27 constitute a revised rebuilding plan
that has at least a 50-percent probability of rebuilding the red
snapper stock by 2032. Proposed actions focus around a reduction in red
snapper total allowable catch to 5 million lb (2.3 million kg). This
would result in a commercial quota of 2.55 million lb (1.16 million kg)
and a recreational quota of 2.45 million lb (1.11 million kg).
Recreational bag limits would be reduced from four fish to two fish;
the bag limit for captain and crew of for-hire vessels would be set at
zero. The commercial minimum size limit would be reduced to 13 inches
(33 cm) total length with the intent of reducing regulatory discards.
To reduce discard mortality in the directed fisheries, Amendment 14/27
proposes an action to require the use of venting tools, dehooking
devices, and non-stainless steel circle hooks (when using natural
baits) for all reef fish fishery sectors. In addition, the amendment
would establish a target reduction goal for shrimp trawl bycatch
mortality on red snapper, establish options for time-area closures for
the shrimp fishery that would maintain the target reduction goal, and
establish a framework whereby NMFS could implement such closures in a
timely fashion.
Length of the recreational fishing season will be determined by a
number of factors. The proposed two-fish bag limit alone would allow a
June 1 through September 15 (107 days) recreational fishing season. In
addition to the two-fish bag limit, constraining the captain and crew
of for-hire vessels to a zero-fish bag limit would allow the fishing
season to be extended through the end of September (122 days). Based on
extensive public comment, the Council chose to assume a 10-percent
reduction in post-hurricane fishing effort and landings when evaluating
recreational management measures. Application of this assumption, along
with implementation of the two-fish bag limit and the zero-fish captain
and crew limit of for-hire vessels, would allow the recreational
fishing season to extend from May 15 through October 15 (154 days).
This assumption is controversial because although preliminary data
suggest some declines have occurred since the 2005 hurricane season,
the magnitude of reductions varies- by fishing sector, is often less
than 10 percent, and in some cases effort or landings have increased.
Further, it is unknown how long post-hurricane reductions in landings
and fishing effort may continue as the fisheries recover. Therefore,
NMFS is specifically requesting comments on the assumed 10-percent
reduction in effort and landings as proposed in Amendment 27/14, which
would affect the designation of the length of the recreational fishing
season established by this rule.
A proposed rule that would implement measures outlined in joint
Amendment 14/27 has been received from the Council. In accordance with
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS is evaluating the proposed rule to
determine whether it is consistent with the FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law. If that determination is affirmative,
NMFS will publish the proposed rule in the Federal Register for public
review and comment.
[[Page 41047]]
Comments received by September 24, 2007, whether specifically
directed to the amendment or the proposed rule, will be considered by
NMFS in its decision to approve, disapprove, or partially approve the
amendment. Comments received after that date will not be considered by
NMFS in this decision. All comments received by NMFS on the amendment
or the proposed rule during their respective comment periods will be
addressed in the final rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: July 23, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-14450 Filed 7-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S