Penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide; Pesticide Tolerance, 40759-40763 [E7-14335]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–14161 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0076; FRL–8137–7]
Penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide;
Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
I. General Information
This regulation establishes a
tolerance for combined residues or
residues of penoxsulam (2-(2,2difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
in or on fish; fish, shellfish, mollusc;
and fish, shellfish, crustacean. Dow
AgroSciences LLC requested this
tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective July
25, 2007. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 24, 2007, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
SUMMARY:
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0076. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
web site to view the docket index or
access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Philip V. Errico, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–6663; e-mail address:
errico.philip@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to those engaged in the
following activities:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111),
e.g., agricultural workers; greenhouse,
nursery, and floriculture workers;
farmers.
• Animal production (NAICS code
112), e.g., cattle ranchers and farmers,
dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311), e.g., agricultural workers; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; ranchers; pesticide applicators.
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532), e.g., agricultural workers;
commercial applicators; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40759
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s pilot
e-CFR site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA,
any person may file an objection to any
aspect of this regulation and may also
request a hearing on those objections.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0076 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or
before September 24, 2007.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit this copy,
identified by docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPP–2006–0076, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
II. Petition for Tolerance
In the Federal Register of April 14,
2006 (72 FR Page 19507) (FRL–8063–4),
EPA issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 5F7012) by Dow
AgroSciences LLC, Dow AgroSciences
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
40760
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road,
Indianapolis, IN 46268–1054. The
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.605
be amended by establishing an
exemption from tolerance for residues of
the herbicide penoxsulam (2-(2,2difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide,
in or on fish and shellfish resulting from
its use as an aquatic herbicide. That
notice referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by Dow AgroSciences,
LLC, the registrant, which is available to
the public in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments were
received on the notice of filing. EPA’s
response to these comments is
discussed in Unit IV. below.
The Registrant modified their
submission and requested tolerances be
established. The reason for these
changes is explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA
to give special consideration to
exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in
establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue. . . .’’ These
provisions were added to the FFDCA by
the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
of 1996.
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D),
of the FFDCA and the factors specified
in section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for the petitioned-for
tolerance for residues of penoxsulam (2(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
on fish, shellfish, mollusc; fish; and
shellfish, crustacean at 0.02, 0.01, and
0.01 ppm. EPA’s assessment of
exposures and risks associated with
establishing the tolerance follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered its validity,
completeness, and reliability as well as
the relationship of the results of the
studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. Specific
information on the studies received and
the nature of the adverse effects caused
by penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
as well as the no-observed-adverseeffect-level (NOAEL) and the lowestobserved-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL)
from the toxicity studies are discussed
in the final rule published in the
Federal Register of September 24, 2004
(EPA–HQ–OPP–2004–0286), (FRL–
7678–6).
B. Toxicological Endpoints
For hazards that have a threshold
below which there is no appreciable
risk, the toxicological level of concern
(LOC) is derived from the highest dose
at which no adverse effects are observed
(the NOAEL) in the toxicology study
identified as appropriate for use in risk
assessment. However, if a NOAEL
cannot be determined, the lowest dose
at which adverse effects of concern are
identified (the LOAEL) is sometimes
used for risk assessment. Uncertainty/
safety factors (UF) are used in
conjunction with the LOC to take into
account uncertainties inherent in the
extrapolation from laboratory animal
data to humans and in the variations in
sensitivity among members of the
human population as well as other
unknowns. Safety is assessed for acute
and chronic risks by comparing
aggregate exposure to the pesticide to
the acute population adjusted dose
(aPAD) and chronic population adjusted
dose (cPAD). The aPAD and cPAD are
calculated by dividing the LOC by all
applicable uncertainty/safety factors.
Short-, intermediate, and long-term risks
are evaluated by comparing aggregate
exposure to the LOC to ensure that the
margin of exposure (MOE) called for by
the product of all applicable
uncertainty/safety factors is not
exceeded.
For non-threshold risks, the Agency
assumes that any amount of exposure
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
will lead to some degree of risk and
estimates risk in terms of the probability
of occurrence of additional adverse
cases. Generally, cancer risks are
considered non-threshold. For more
information on the general principles
EPA uses in risk characterization and a
complete description of the risk
assessment process, see https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1997/
November/Day-26/p30948.htm.
A summary of the toxicological
endpoints for penoxsulam (2-(2,2difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
used for human risk assessment can be
found at www.regulations.gov in
document ‘‘Penoxsulam. Human Health
Risk Assessment for Proposed Uses on
Fish and Shellfish. PC Code: 119031,
Petition No: 5F7012, DP Num: 325461.’’
at page 42 in Docket ID EPA–HQ–OPP–
2006–0076.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to penoxsulam (2-(2,2difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide,
EPA considered exposure under the
petitioned-for tolerances as well as all
existing penoxsulam (2-(2,2difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
tolerances in (40 CFR 180.605). EPA
assessed dietary exposures from
penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
in food as follows:
i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute
dietary exposure and risk assessments
are performed for a food-use pesticide,
if a toxicological study has indicated the
possibility of an effect of concern
occurring as a result of a 1–day or single
exposure.
No such effects were identified in the
toxicological studies for penoxsulam (2(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide;
therefore, a quantitative acute dietary
exposure assessment is unnecessary.
ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting
the chronic dietary exposure assessment
EPA used the food consumption data
from the USDA 1994–1996 and 1998;
Nationwide Continuing Surveys of Food
Intake by Individuals (CSFII). As to
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
residue levels in food, EPA assumed all
foods for which there are tolerances
were treated and contain tolerance-level
residues.
iii. Cancer. Penoxsulam was classified
as ‘‘Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenic
Potential.’’ There is some cancer
concern, but the data are judged not
sufficient for a stronger conclusion or a
quantitative cancer risk assessment (see
Unit III.E.5).
iv. Anticipated residue and percent
crop treated (PCT) information. EPA
assumed tolerance level residues and
100% of the crop is treated.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking
water. The Agency lacks sufficient
monitoring data to complete a
comprehensive dietary exposure
analysis and risk assessment for
penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
in drinking water. Because the Agency
does not have comprehensive
monitoring data, drinking water
concentration estimates are made by
reliance on simulation or modeling
taking into account data on the
environmental fate characteristics of
penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide).
Further information regarding EPA
drinking water models used in pesticide
exposure assessment can be found at
https://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/
water/index.htm.
Based on the FQPA Index Reservoir
Screening Tool and Screening
Concentrations in Groundwater models,
the estimated environmental
concentrations (EECs) of penoxsulam (2(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
for acute exposures are estimated to be
150 parts per billion (ppb) for surface
water and 150 ppb for ground water.
The EECs for chronic exposures are
estimated to be 150 ppb for surface
water and 150 ppb for ground water.
Modeled estimates of drinking water
concentrations were directly entered
into the dietary exposure model. For
acute dietary risk assessment, the water
concentration value of 150 ppb was
used to access the contribution to
drinking water. For chronic dietary risk
assessment, the water concentration
value of 150 ppb was used to access the
contribution to drinking water.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:00 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
(e.g., for lawn and garden pest control,
indoor pest control, termiticides, and
flea and tick control on pets).
Penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) is
currently registered for the following
residential non-dietary sites: Turf/lawn.
EPA assessed residential exposure using
the following assumptions:
• 1,000 ft2 per day by low pressure
hand wand or back pack sprayer for spot
treatment of lawns
• 0.5 acres per day by push-type
granular spreader for broadcast
treatment of lawns
• 0.06 lb active ingredient (ai) per
acre for broadcast treatment
• 0.0014 to 0.0016 lbs per 1,000 ft2 for
spot treatment
4. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
Unlike other pesticides for which EPA
has followed a cumulative risk approach
based on a common mechanism of
toxicity, EPA has not made a common
mechanism of toxicity finding as to
penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
and any other substances and
penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
does not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other
substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not
assumed that penoxsulam (2-(2,2difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
has a common mechanism of toxicity
with other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
1. In general. Section 408 of FFDCA
provides that EPA shall apply an
additional (‘‘10X’’) tenfold margin of
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40761
safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for
prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the data base on
toxicity and exposure unless EPA
determines based on reliable data that a
different margin of safety will be safe for
infants and children. This additional
margin of safety is commonly referred to
as the FQPA safety factor. In applying
this provision, EPA either retains the
default value of 10X when reliable data
do not support the choice of a different
factor, or, if reliable data are available,
EPA uses a different additional FQPA
safety factor value based on the use of
traditional uncertainty/safety factors
and/or special FQPA safety factors, as
appropriate.
2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity.
Based on the results of the submitted
toxicology studies, EPA concluded that
no FQPA safety factor is needed (i.e. 1X)
since there are no residual uncertainties
for prenatal and/or postnatal toxicity.
3. Conclusion. EPA has determined
that reliable data show that it would be
safe for infants and children to reduce
the FQPA safety factor to 1X. That
decision is based on the following
findings:
i. There was no toxicologically
significant evidence observed of
neurotoxicity in either the acute or
chronic neurotoxicity study.
ii. No definitive quantitative or
qualitative susceptibility was observed
in either of the developmental rat or
rabbit studies.
iii. Significant dose-related effects in
the 2–generation reproduction study
were limited to the delay in preputial
separation. No other endpoints of
reproductive toxicity or offspring
growth and survival were affected by
treatment.
iv. The chronic dietary food exposure
assessment utilizes proposed tolerance
level residues and 100% crop treated for
all commodities. By using these
conservative assessments, actual and
chronic exposures/risks will not be
underestimated.
v. The dietary drinking water
assessment (Tier 1 estimates) utilizes
values generated by model and
associated modeling parameters which
are designed to provide conservative,
health protective, high-end estimates of
water concentrations.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
Safety is assessed for acute and
chronic risks by comparing aggregate
exposure to the pesticide to the aPAD
and cPAD. The aPAD and cPAD are
calculated by dividing the LOC by all
applicable uncertainty/safety factors.
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
40762
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates
the probability of additional cancer
cases given aggregate exposure. Short-,
intermediate, and long-term risks are
evaluated by comparing aggregate
exposure to the LOC to ensure that the
MOE called for by the product of all
applicable uncertainty/safety factors is
not exceeded.
1. Acute risk. There were no
treatment-related effects observed in any
of the available toxicity studies on
penoxsulam that could be considered to
have resulted from a single dose of
penoxsulam. Therefore no acute
exposure is expected.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure
assumptions described in this unit for
chronic exposure, EPA has concluded
that exposure to penoxsulam (2-(2,2difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
for the most highly exposed population
subgroup from food and water, which
utilizes 7% of the cPAD is all infants (<1
year old).
3. Short-term risk and intermediate
term risk. For this aquatic use pattern,
short- and intermediate-term aggregate
exposure takes into account residential
exposure, exposure while swimming,
plus chronic exposure to food and water
(considered being a background
exposure level). There is a potential for
post application exposure from oral and
dermal routes of exposure while
swimming in aquatic sites and/or from
turf (lawns, golf courses, sports fields,
and sod farms) sites treated with
penoxsulam.
EPA used the SWIMODEL from the
Residential Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) to assess dermal and
oral exposure to recreational swimmers.
Parameters used in calculating exposure
and risk are based on information for
competitive swimmers both adult and
children (6 years old) in swimming
pools which includes an exposure
duration of 5 hours. It is anticipated that
recreational swimmers in weed infested
areas would be less likely to swim with
their heads immersed than recreational
swimmers in weed-free swimming
pools. Since there were no short-term
dermal, systemic, neuro or
developmental toxicity concerns, the
short-term post application assessment
addresses only the oral exposure, which
results in the same estimated dose for
intermediate-term exposure. Thus a
short-term aggregate exposure was not
required, and the intermediate-term post
application exposure assessment
combined both oral and dermal
exposures, and is also protective for
short-term exposure. Short- and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:00 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
intermediate-term postapplication
exposures resulted in MOEs> 100 and
are therefore not a concern to the
Agency. The Agency considers the
swimmer dermal and oral MOEs to be
over estimates of the actual risk, and
therefore swimming exposure
assessment was not used in assessing
the short- and intermediate-term
aggregate risk, and only the exposure
resulting from the turf use was assessed.
The short-term aggregate risk
assessment estimates include both oral
and inhalation exposures appropriate to
the population of concern. Short-term
dermal exposure was not aggregated
because no toxicological endpoint was
selected. For adults, short-term
exposure to penoxsulam can occur as a
result of the residential use on turf.
Because oral exposure from the
residential use as a handler is not
expected in adults and no short-term
dermal endpoint was selected, only the
short-term residential exposure by
inhalation is expected in adults. The
worst-case MOE residential exposure
estimate was aggregated with the
chronic dietary (food + water) to
provide a worst-case estimate of shortterm aggregate risk for U.S. population.
As the aggregate MOE is greater than
100, the short-term aggregate risk to
adults does exceed EPA’s level of
concern.
For children/toddlers, short-term
exposure to penoxsulam can occur as a
result of the residential use on turf.
Because post-application inhalation
exposure is negligible and no short-term
dermal endpoint was selected, only
short-term residential exposure from
oral exposure was included with food
and drinking water in the short-term
aggregate risk assessment for children/
toddlers. The worst-case MOE
residential exposure estimate for
children was aggregated with the
chronic dietary (food + water) to
provide a worst-case estimate of shortterm aggregate risk for all infants (<1
year old), the child population subgroup
with the highest estimated chronic
dietary food exposure. As the aggregate
MOE is greater than 100, the short-term
aggregate risks to children do not exceed
EPA’s level of concern.
Because the amount of residues on
turf after 30 days will be negligible, both
inhalation and dermal exposure is
negligible, and therefore no
intermediate-term aggregate exposure
assessment from this turf use is
required.
4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S.
population. The cancer potential for
penoxsulam is classified as ‘‘Suggestive
Evidence of Carcinogenic Potential.’’
The classification is based on an
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
increase in large granular lymphocyte
leukemia (also called mononuclear cell
leukemia (MNCL)) in male Fischer 344
rats. There were increased tumors at all
dose levels which exceeded the
laboratory historical control data. There
is considerable controversy as to the
significance and relevance of the tumors
for humans, but they cannot be
discounted in the overall weight of the
evidence. While there is some cancer
concern, the data are judged not
sufficient for a stronger conclusion or a
quantitative cancer risk assessment.
5. Determination of safety. Based on
these risk assessments, EPA concludes
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to the general
population, or to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to penoxsulam
(2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide)
residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology,
using high performance liquid
chromatograph with tandem mass
spectroscopy-mass spectroscopy
detector (LC/MS/MS), and is available
to enforce the tolerance expression. The
method may be requested from: Chief,
Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905; email address: residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
There are no CODEX maximum
residue limits (MRLs) for fish; fish,
shellfish, mollusc; and fish, shellfish,
crustacean.
C. Response to Comments
Comments were received from a
private citizen objecting to this product
being used in the world, and that the
product is too dangerous to be allowed
use. A print-out of what appears to be
EPA’s summary of the toxicological
effects and tolerances for rice were
included. No other information was
provided. EPA has found that there is a
reasonable certainty of no harm to
humans after considering all pertinent
toxicology studies and the exposure
levels of humans to penoxsulam.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance is established
for residues of penoxsulam (2-(2,2difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide,
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
in or on fish, shellfish, mollusc; fish;
and shellfish, crustacean at 0.02, 0.01,
and 0.01 ppm. The registrant initially
requested exemptions from tolerances
for fish and shellfish. Based upon
review of the data supporting the
petition by EPA and subsequent to
completion of this risk assessment, the
registrant revised their submission and
requested tolerances for finfish at 0.01
ppm; shellfish, crustacean at 0.01 ppm;
and shellfish, mollusc at 0.02 ppm. For
consistency the commodity terms are
revised to fish at 0.01 ppm; fish,
shellfish, crustacean at 0.01 ppm; and
fish, shellfish, mollusc at 0.02 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:55 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) do not apply
to this rule. In addition, This rule does
not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 13, 2007.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—AMENDED
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.605 is amended by
alphabetically adding the following
commodities to the table in paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40763
§ 180.605 Penoxsulam; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * *
Parts per
million
Commodity
Fish ...........................................
Fish, shellfish, crustacean ........
Fish, shellfish, mollusc .............
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
0.01
0.01
0.02
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–14335 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0313; FRL–8137–4]
Glufosinate-ammonium; Pesticide
Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a
tolerance for combined residues of
Glufosinate-ammonium in or on
pistachio. Interregional Research Project
No. 4 requested this tolerance under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
This regulation is effective July
25, 2007. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 24, 2007, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2007–0313. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
web site to view the docket index or
access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 25, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40759-40763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14335]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0076; FRL-8137-7]
Penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-
dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide; Pesticide Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for combined residues
or residues of penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-
dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) in or on fish; fish, shellfish,
mollusc; and fish, shellfish, crustacean. Dow AgroSciences LLC
requested this tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective July 25, 2007. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 24, 2007,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0076. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced
Search,'' then ``Docket Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where
indicated and select the ``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on
the regulations.gov web site to view the docket index or access
available documents. All documents in the docket are listed in the
docket index available in regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or,
if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in
Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr.,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip V. Errico, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-6663; e-mail address:
errico.philip@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to those
engaged in the following activities:
Crop production (NAICS code 111), e.g., agricultural
workers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; farmers.
Animal production (NAICS code 112), e.g., cattle ranchers
and farmers, dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311), e.g., agricultural
workers; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers;
ranchers; pesticide applicators.
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532), e.g.,
agricultural workers; commercial applicators; farmers; greenhouse,
nursery, and floriculture workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather to
provide a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by
this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in
determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of EPA's tolerance regulations at
40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR
site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, any person may file an objection
to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on
those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on
this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0076 in the subject line on the first page of
your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or
delivered to the Hearing Clerk as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or
before September 24, 2007.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit this copy, identified by docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0076, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Petition for Tolerance
In the Federal Register of April 14, 2006 (72 FR Page 19507) (FRL-
8063-4), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
5F7012) by Dow AgroSciences LLC, Dow AgroSciences
[[Page 40760]]
LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268-1054. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.605 be amended by establishing an exemption
from tolerance for residues of the herbicide penoxsulam (2-(2,2-
difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-
6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide, in or on fish and shellfish
resulting from its use as an aquatic herbicide. That notice referenced
a summary of the petition prepared by Dow AgroSciences, LLC, the
registrant, which is available to the public in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments were received on the notice of filing.
EPA's response to these comments is discussed in Unit IV. below.
The Registrant modified their submission and requested tolerances
be established. The reason for these changes is explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.'' These provisions were added to the FFDCA by the Food Quality
Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996.
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D), of the FFDCA and the factors
specified in section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for the petitioned-for tolerance
for residues of penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-
dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) on fish, shellfish, mollusc; fish;
and shellfish, crustacean at 0.02, 0.01, and 0.01 ppm. EPA's assessment
of exposures and risks associated with establishing the tolerance
follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the adverse effects caused by penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-
(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) as well as the no-observed-
adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-
level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in the final rule
published in the Federal Register of September 24, 2004 (EPA-HQ-OPP-
2004-0286), (FRL-7678-6).
B. Toxicological Endpoints
For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological level of concern (LOC) is derived
from the highest dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the
NOAEL) in the toxicology study identified as appropriate for use in
risk assessment. However, if a NOAEL cannot be determined, the lowest
dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified (the LOAEL) is
sometimes used for risk assessment. Uncertainty/safety factors (UF) are
used in conjunction with the LOC to take into account uncertainties
inherent in the extrapolation from laboratory animal data to humans and
in the variations in sensitivity among members of the human population
as well as other unknowns. Safety is assessed for acute and chronic
risks by comparing aggregate exposure to the pesticide to the acute
population adjusted dose (aPAD) and chronic population adjusted dose
(cPAD). The aPAD and cPAD are calculated by dividing the LOC by all
applicable uncertainty/safety factors. Short-, intermediate, and long-
term risks are evaluated by comparing aggregate exposure to the LOC to
ensure that the margin of exposure (MOE) called for by the product of
all applicable uncertainty/safety factors is not exceeded.
For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any amount of
exposure will lead to some degree of risk and estimates risk in terms
of the probability of occurrence of additional adverse cases.
Generally, cancer risks are considered non-threshold. For more
information on the general principles EPA uses in risk characterization
and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1997/November/Day-26/p30948.htm.
A summary of the toxicological endpoints for penoxsulam (2-(2,2-
difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-
6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) used for human risk assessment
can be found at www.regulations.gov in document ``Penoxsulam. Human
Health Risk Assessment for Proposed Uses on Fish and Shellfish. PC
Code: 119031, Petition No: 5F7012, DP Num: 325461.'' at page 42 in
Docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0076.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-
dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide, EPA considered exposure under the
petitioned-for tolerances as well as all existing penoxsulam (2-(2,2-
difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-
6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) tolerances in (40 CFR 180.605).
EPA assessed dietary exposures from penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-
N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) in food as follows:
i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring
as a result of a 1-day or single exposure.
No such effects were identified in the toxicological studies for
penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-
c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide; therefore, a
quantitative acute dietary exposure assessment is unnecessary.
ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure
assessment EPA used the food consumption data from the USDA 1994-1996
and 1998; Nationwide Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals
(CSFII). As to
[[Page 40761]]
residue levels in food, EPA assumed all foods for which there are
tolerances were treated and contain tolerance-level residues.
iii. Cancer. Penoxsulam was classified as ``Suggestive Evidence of
Carcinogenic Potential.'' There is some cancer concern, but the data
are judged not sufficient for a stronger conclusion or a quantitative
cancer risk assessment (see Unit III.E.5).
iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information.
EPA assumed tolerance level residues and 100% of the crop is treated.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency lacks
sufficient monitoring data to complete a comprehensive dietary exposure
analysis and risk assessment for penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-
(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) in drinking water. Because the
Agency does not have comprehensive monitoring data, drinking water
concentration estimates are made by reliance on simulation or modeling
taking into account data on the environmental fate characteristics of
penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-
c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide). Further
information regarding EPA drinking water models used in pesticide
exposure assessment can be found at https://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/
water/index.htm.
Based on the FQPA Index Reservoir Screening Tool and Screening
Concentrations in Groundwater models, the estimated environmental
concentrations (EECs) of penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-
dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) for acute exposures are estimated
to be 150 parts per billion (ppb) for surface water and 150 ppb for
ground water. The EECs for chronic exposures are estimated to be 150
ppb for surface water and 150 ppb for ground water.
Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly
entered into the dietary exposure model. For acute dietary risk
assessment, the water concentration value of 150 ppb was used to access
the contribution to drinking water. For chronic dietary risk
assessment, the water concentration value of 150 ppb was used to access
the contribution to drinking water.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
Penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-
dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) is currently registered for the
following residential non-dietary sites: Turf/lawn. EPA assessed
residential exposure using the following assumptions:
1,000 ft2 per day by low pressure hand wand or
back pack sprayer for spot treatment of lawns
0.5 acres per day by push-type granular spreader for
broadcast treatment of lawns
0.06 lb active ingredient (ai) per acre for broadcast
treatment
0.0014 to 0.0016 lbs per 1,000 ft2 for spot
treatment
4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative
risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made
a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to penoxsulam (2-(2,2-
difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-
6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) and any other substances and
penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-
c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) does not
appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For
the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed
that penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-
dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) has a common mechanism of toxicity
with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to
determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to
evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's website at
https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
1. In general. Section 408 of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply
an additional (``10X'') tenfold margin of safety for infants and
children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and
postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the data base on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA safety
factor. In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X when reliable data do not support the choice of a
different factor, or, if reliable data are available, EPA uses a
different additional FQPA safety factor value based on the use of
traditional uncertainty/safety factors and/or special FQPA safety
factors, as appropriate.
2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. Based on the results of the
submitted toxicology studies, EPA concluded that no FQPA safety factor
is needed (i.e. 1X) since there are no residual uncertainties for
prenatal and/or postnatal toxicity.
3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show that it
would be safe for infants and children to reduce the FQPA safety factor
to 1X. That decision is based on the following findings:
i. There was no toxicologically significant evidence observed of
neurotoxicity in either the acute or chronic neurotoxicity study.
ii. No definitive quantitative or qualitative susceptibility was
observed in either of the developmental rat or rabbit studies.
iii. Significant dose-related effects in the 2-generation
reproduction study were limited to the delay in preputial separation.
No other endpoints of reproductive toxicity or offspring growth and
survival were affected by treatment.
iv. The chronic dietary food exposure assessment utilizes proposed
tolerance level residues and 100% crop treated for all commodities. By
using these conservative assessments, actual and chronic exposures/
risks will not be underestimated.
v. The dietary drinking water assessment (Tier 1 estimates)
utilizes values generated by model and associated modeling parameters
which are designed to provide conservative, health protective, high-end
estimates of water concentrations.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
Safety is assessed for acute and chronic risks by comparing
aggregate exposure to the pesticide to the aPAD and cPAD. The aPAD and
cPAD are calculated by dividing the LOC by all applicable uncertainty/
safety factors.
[[Page 40762]]
For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the probability of additional
cancer cases given aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate, and long-
term risks are evaluated by comparing aggregate exposure to the LOC to
ensure that the MOE called for by the product of all applicable
uncertainty/safety factors is not exceeded.
1. Acute risk. There were no treatment-related effects observed in
any of the available toxicity studies on penoxsulam that could be
considered to have resulted from a single dose of penoxsulam. Therefore
no acute exposure is expected.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that exposure to
penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-
c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) for the most
highly exposed population subgroup from food and water, which utilizes
7% of the cPAD is all infants (<1 year old).
3. Short-term risk and intermediate term risk. For this aquatic use
pattern, short- and intermediate-term aggregate exposure takes into
account residential exposure, exposure while swimming, plus chronic
exposure to food and water (considered being a background exposure
level). There is a potential for post application exposure from oral
and dermal routes of exposure while swimming in aquatic sites and/or
from turf (lawns, golf courses, sports fields, and sod farms) sites
treated with penoxsulam.
EPA used the SWIMODEL from the Residential Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) to assess dermal and oral exposure to recreational
swimmers. Parameters used in calculating exposure and risk are based on
information for competitive swimmers both adult and children (6 years
old) in swimming pools which includes an exposure duration of 5 hours.
It is anticipated that recreational swimmers in weed infested areas
would be less likely to swim with their heads immersed than
recreational swimmers in weed-free swimming pools. Since there were no
short-term dermal, systemic, neuro or developmental toxicity concerns,
the short-term post application assessment addresses only the oral
exposure, which results in the same estimated dose for intermediate-
term exposure. Thus a short-term aggregate exposure was not required,
and the intermediate-term post application exposure assessment combined
both oral and dermal exposures, and is also protective for short-term
exposure. Short- and intermediate-term postapplication exposures
resulted in MOEs> 100 and are therefore not a concern to the Agency.
The Agency considers the swimmer dermal and oral MOEs to be over
estimates of the actual risk, and therefore swimming exposure
assessment was not used in assessing the short- and intermediate-term
aggregate risk, and only the exposure resulting from the turf use was
assessed.
The short-term aggregate risk assessment estimates include both
oral and inhalation exposures appropriate to the population of concern.
Short-term dermal exposure was not aggregated because no toxicological
endpoint was selected. For adults, short-term exposure to penoxsulam
can occur as a result of the residential use on turf. Because oral
exposure from the residential use as a handler is not expected in
adults and no short-term dermal endpoint was selected, only the short-
term residential exposure by inhalation is expected in adults. The
worst-case MOE residential exposure estimate was aggregated with the
chronic dietary (food + water) to provide a worst-case estimate of
short-term aggregate risk for U.S. population. As the aggregate MOE is
greater than 100, the short-term aggregate risk to adults does exceed
EPA's level of concern.
For children/toddlers, short-term exposure to penoxsulam can occur
as a result of the residential use on turf. Because post-application
inhalation exposure is negligible and no short-term dermal endpoint was
selected, only short-term residential exposure from oral exposure was
included with food and drinking water in the short-term aggregate risk
assessment for children/toddlers. The worst-case MOE residential
exposure estimate for children was aggregated with the chronic dietary
(food + water) to provide a worst-case estimate of short-term aggregate
risk for all infants (<1 year old), the child population subgroup with
the highest estimated chronic dietary food exposure. As the aggregate
MOE is greater than 100, the short-term aggregate risks to children do
not exceed EPA's level of concern.
Because the amount of residues on turf after 30 days will be
negligible, both inhalation and dermal exposure is negligible, and
therefore no intermediate-term aggregate exposure assessment from this
turf use is required.
4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. The cancer potential
for penoxsulam is classified as ``Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenic
Potential.'' The classification is based on an increase in large
granular lymphocyte leukemia (also called mononuclear cell leukemia
(MNCL)) in male Fischer 344 rats. There were increased tumors at all
dose levels which exceeded the laboratory historical control data.
There is considerable controversy as to the significance and relevance
of the tumors for humans, but they cannot be discounted in the overall
weight of the evidence. While there is some cancer concern, the data
are judged not sufficient for a stronger conclusion or a quantitative
cancer risk assessment.
5. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to penoxsulam (2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-
dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide) residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology, using high performance liquid
chromatograph with tandem mass spectroscopy-mass spectroscopy detector
(LC/MS/MS), and is available to enforce the tolerance expression. The
method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350;
telephone number: (410) 305-2905; e-mail address:
residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
There are no CODEX maximum residue limits (MRLs) for fish; fish,
shellfish, mollusc; and fish, shellfish, crustacean.
C. Response to Comments
Comments were received from a private citizen objecting to this
product being used in the world, and that the product is too dangerous
to be allowed use. A print-out of what appears to be EPA's summary of
the toxicological effects and tolerances for rice were included. No
other information was provided. EPA has found that there is a
reasonable certainty of no harm to humans after considering all
pertinent toxicology studies and the exposure levels of humans to
penoxsulam.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance is established for residues of penoxsulam
(2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-
c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide,
[[Page 40763]]
in or on fish, shellfish, mollusc; fish; and shellfish, crustacean at
0.02, 0.01, and 0.01 ppm. The registrant initially requested exemptions
from tolerances for fish and shellfish. Based upon review of the data
supporting the petition by EPA and subsequent to completion of this
risk assessment, the registrant revised their submission and requested
tolerances for finfish at 0.01 ppm; shellfish, crustacean at 0.01 ppm;
and shellfish, mollusc at 0.02 ppm. For consistency the commodity terms
are revised to fish at 0.01 ppm; fish, shellfish, crustacean at 0.01
ppm; and fish, shellfish, mollusc at 0.02 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action
alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities
established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section
408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal
governments, on the relationship between the national government and
the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000) do not apply to this rule. In addition, This rule does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 13, 2007.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--AMENDED
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.605 is amended by alphabetically adding the following
commodities to the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.605 Penoxsulam; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish....................................................... 0.01
Fish, shellfish, crustacean................................ 0.01
Fish, shellfish, mollusc................................... 0.02
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-14335 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S