Elimination of Exemptions for Chemical Mixtures Containing the List I Chemicals Ephedrine and/or Pseudoephedrine, 40738-40745 [E7-14295]
Download as PDF
40738
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 20, 2007.
Deborah J. Spero,
Acting Commissioner, Customs and Border
Protection.
[FR Doc. E7–14406 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1310
[Docket No. DEA–284I]
RIN 1117–AB11
Elimination of Exemptions for
Chemical Mixtures Containing the List
I Chemicals Ephedrine and/or
Pseudoephedrine
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This Interim Rule removes the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
exemptions for chemical mixtures
containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine with concentration
limits at or below five percent. The
Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic
Act of 2005 (CMEA) added additional
controls on ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine and mandated that
DEA limit the domestic production and
importation of materials containing
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine to
quantities necessary for medical,
scientific and other legitimate purposes
(21 U.S.C. 952(a)(1) as amended). DEA
is eliminating exemptions for these
chemical mixtures. As such, all
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine
chemical mixtures, regardless of
concentration and form, shall be subject
to the regulatory provisions of the CSA.
DEA is not prohibiting the
importation, exportation, manufacture,
or distribution of chemical mixtures
containing ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine in concentrations less
than or equal to five percent. Rather,
DEA is regulating the importation,
exportation, manufacture, and
distribution of these chemical mixtures
by requiring persons who handle these
chemical mixtures to register with DEA,
maintain certain records common to
business practice, and file certain
reports, regarding these chemical
mixtures. Chemical mixtures containing
the List I chemicals ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine will still be available
for use.
DATES: Effective August 24, 2007.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Persons seeking registration must
apply on or before August 24, 2007 in
order to continue their business pending
final action by DEA on their application.
Written comments must be postmarked,
and electronic comments must be sent,
on or before September 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–284I’’ on all written and
electronic correspondence. Written
comments being sent via regular mail
should be sent to the Deputy
Administrator, Drug Enforcement
Administration, Washington, DC 20537,
Attention: DEA Federal Register
Representative/ODL. Written comments
sent via express mail should be sent to
DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative/ODL,
2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway,
Alexandria, VA 22301. Comments may
be sent directly to DEA electronically by
sending an electronic message to
dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov.
Comments may also be sent
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov using the
electronic comment form provided on
that site. An electronic copy of this
document is also available at the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
DEA will accept attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file
formats only. DEA will not accept any
file format other than those specifically
listed here.
Posting of Public Comments: Please
note that all comments received are
considered part of the public record and
made available for public inspection
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
Such information includes personal
identifying information (for example,
name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online, you must include the
phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also place
all the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online in the
first paragraph of your comment and
identify the information you want
redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment but do not want it to be posted
online, you must include the phrase
‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify confidential
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
business information to be redacted
within the comment. If a comment has
so much confidential business
information that it cannot be effectively
redacted, all or part of that comment
may not be posted on https://
www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information and
confidential business information
identified and located as set forth above
will be redacted and placed in the
agency’s public docket file, and, where
possible, posted online. If you wish to
inspect the agency’s public docket file
in person by appointment, please see
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION paragraph.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Sannerud, PhD, Chief, Drug
& Chemical Evaluation Section, Office
of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, Washington, DC 20537,
telephone (202) 307–7183, fax (202)
353–1263, or e-mail ode@dea.usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Status of Dietary Supplements
Containing Ephedrine and/or
Pseudoephedrine
Dietary supplements containing the
List I chemicals ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine are regulated as
chemical mixtures under the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA). DEA originally
exempted these products from CSA
regulatory control if the total
concentration of the ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine was at or below five
percent, in an effort to reduce the
regulatory burden on the dietary and
nutritional supplement industry (68 FR
23195, May 1, 2003). However, on
February 11, 2004, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) issued a Final
Rule (69 FR 6787) declaring dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids adulterated under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the
FFD&C Act) because these dietary
supplements present an unreasonable
risk of illness or injury. Effective April
12, 2004, the rule prohibits the sale of
dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids such as ephedra
(also known as Ma Huang, sida
cordifolia and pinellia). The effect of the
FDA rule was to ban the lawful
marketing of these products.
DEA notes that the FDA ban addresses
only the marketing of dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids. The raw materials used to
manufacture these dietary supplements
are not restricted by the FDA ban.
Accordingly, to control those materials,
DEA must address the importation,
exportation, manufacture, or
distribution of chemical mixtures with
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
concentration limits of ephedrine and/
or pseudoephedrine at or below five
percent. The importation, exportation,
manufacture, and distribution of
chemical mixtures with concentration
limits at or below five percent
ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine are
addressed by the CSA and its
implementing regulations. As there yet
may be legitimate uses for chemical
mixtures with concentration limits at or
below five percent, the importation,
exportation, manufacture, and
distribution of these chemical mixtures
(for purposes other than use in dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids) are not prohibited by either
FDA’s ban regarding the marketing of
such dietary supplements or by DEA
law and regulations. Accordingly, as
discussed further below, for DEA to
regulate the importation, exportation,
manufacture, and distribution of
chemical mixtures containing ephedrine
and/or pseudoephedrine with
concentration limits at or below five
percent, DEA must remove these
chemical mixtures from their exempt
status under CSA regulations.
DEA recognizes that ephedra
materials containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine are used legitimately
by practitioners of Traditional Chinese
Medicine. This rulemaking does not
restrict the utilization of such material
for such legitimate purposes. This
rulemaking will simply require
importers and suppliers of such material
to comply with DEA recordkeeping,
registration, quota and import/export
requirements.
Plant Material Included in This
Regulatory Action
The ephedrine alkaloids, including,
among others, ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, norephedrine, Nmethylephedrine, norpseudoephedrine,
N-methylpseudoephedrine, are
chemical stimulants that occur naturally
in some botanicals, but can be
synthetically derived. The ingredient
sources of the ephedrine alkaloids
include raw botanicals (i.e., plants) and
extracts from botanicals. Ma Huang,
ephedra, Chinese Ephedra, and epitonin
are several names used for botanical
ingredients, primarily from Ephedra
sinica Stapf, ephedra equisetina Bunge,
Ephedra intermedia var. tibetica Stapf
and Ephedra distachya Linne. (the
Ephedras), that are sources of ephedrine
alkaloids (including ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine). Other plant sources
that contain such ephedrine alkaloids
include Sida cordifolia L. and Pinellia
ternata (Thunb.) Makino. Common
names that have been used for the
various plants that contain ephedrine
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
alkaloids include sea grape, yellow
horse, joint fir, popotillo, and country
mallow. Although the proportions of the
various ephedrine alkaloids in botanical
species vary from one species to
another, in most species used
commercially, ephedrine is typically the
predominant alkaloid in the raw
material. In addition to chemical
mixtures from synthetic sources, this
rulemaking includes those plant sources
that contain the ephedrine alkaloids,
ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine.
The names desert herb, squaw tea,
Brigham tea, and Mormon tea refer to
North American species of ephedra that
do not contain ephedrine alkaloids but
have been misused to identify
ephedrine alkaloid containing
ingredients. This rulemaking does not
pertain to species of ephedra that do not
contain ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine.
Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic
Act of 2005 (CMEA)
On March 9, 2006, the President
signed the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA), which is
Title VII of the USA PATRIOT
Improvement and Reauthorization Act
of 2005. The CMEA mandates that DEA
limit the domestic production and
importation of materials containing
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine
(including ephedra) to quantities
necessary for medical, scientific and
other legitimate purposes (21 U.S.C. 826
and 952(a)(1) as amended). DEA is
concerned about the illicit use of
ephedra type material in the clandestine
production of methamphetamine. While
the legitimate market for dietary
supplements containing such material
has been cut by FDA’s recent action,
DEA has seen an increasing number of
requests for importation of below-five
percent ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine material. DEA notes
that there may be legitimate uses for
these chemical mixtures. However, in
light of FDA’s action, DEA is concerned
about the intended purpose of such
material, especially given that such
material has been seized in clandestine
drug laboratories.
Chemical Mixture Regulatory Control
History
The Chemical Diversion and
Trafficking Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100–
690) (CDTA) was passed by Congress to
curtail the diversion of specific
chemicals used in the illicit
manufacture of controlled substances.
The CDTA established recordkeeping
and reporting requirements necessary
for DEA to identify and track chemical
diversion. While the CDTA achieved
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40739
initial success in curtailing the
diversion of chemicals, traffickers soon
found and took advantage of certain
shortcomings in the law. In the United
States (U.S.), traffickers were able to
obtain needed supplies by purchasing
products that were exempted from
regulation under the CDTA. Such
products include chemical mixtures.
Chemical Mixture Definition
The CDTA created a definition of
‘‘chemical mixture’’ (21 U.S.C. 802(40)),
and exempted chemical mixtures from
the definition of ‘‘regulated
transaction.’’ (21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi)
as amended by CMEA) Chemical
mixtures are defined as ‘‘a combination
of two or more chemical substances, at
least one of which is not a list I
chemical or a List II chemical, except
that such term does not include any
combination of a List I chemical or a
List II chemical with another chemical
that is present solely as an impurity.’’
(21 U.S.C. 802(40))
Chemical Mixtures Containing
Ephedrine and Pseudoephedrine
Ephedrine and pseudoephedrine are
List I chemicals. Listed chemicals that
are classified as List I chemicals are
important to the manufacture of
controlled substances. Chemical
mixtures containing both these List I
chemicals include dietary and
nutritional supplements. Prior to FDA’s
2004 Final Rule, dietary and nutritional
supplements containing both of these
chemicals were readily available in the
U.S., commonly sold to the public in
drug and grocery stores, health and
nutrition stores, and through direct
marketing campaigns. These dietary and
nutritional supplements contained
ephedra plant material, or extracts from
the ephedra plant. If these dietary and
nutritional supplements met certain
criteria under the FFD&CA, they were
not recognized as drugs under the
FFD&CA, but nonetheless were
considered to be chemical mixtures
governed by DEA law and regulations.
In contrast, over-the-counter (OTC) and
prescription drug products containing
these listed chemicals are not
considered chemical mixtures (as long
as they are in final FDA approved
labeled package form) and instead are
specifically addressed in 21 U.S.C.
802(39)(A)(iv) and (v) as amended by
CMEA. Also see 21 CFR
1300.02(b)(28)(i).
Initial Chemical Mixture Controls
Prior to the Domestic Chemical
Diversion Control Act of 1993 (DCDCA),
enacted in April of 1994, transactions
involving all chemical mixtures
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
40740
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
(including dietary supplements) were
exempt from recordkeeping, registration
and other chemical regulatory control
requirements of the CSA. The DCDCA
amended the CSA (21 U.S.C.
802(39)(A)(v)) to limit the application of
the above stated exemption and
provided the Attorney General with the
authority to exempt a chemical mixture
containing a listed chemical if it is
‘‘formulated in such a way that it cannot
be easily used in the illicit production
of a controlled substance’’ and ‘‘the
listed chemical or chemicals contained
in the mixture cannot be readily
recovered.’’ As such, only those
chemical mixtures meeting these criteria
would be exempted from control. Until
regulations which delineated criteria
and procedures for exempting specific
chemical mixtures were finalized, as a
practical interpretation of the law, DEA
treated all chemical mixtures, including
dietary and nutritional supplements, as
being exempt from the chemical
regulatory requirements of the CSA.
(Note that OTC and prescription drug
products are not considered chemical
mixtures and are addressed separately
under 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(iv)). Unless
exempted pursuant to law and
regulations, the requirements for
chemical mixtures included registration
for certain handlers of List I chemicals,
recordkeeping, reporting and security.
Concern Regarding Chemical Mixtures
Some chemical mixtures can be and
have been used by traffickers in the
illicit manufacture of controlled
substances. This exemption provided
traffickers with an unregulated source
for obtaining these chemicals. To
address these problems, the DCDCA
amended the exemption to provide that
only those chemical mixtures specified
by regulation would be exempt from the
definition of ‘‘regulated transaction.’’
Regulations regarding the exemption
of chemical mixtures were initially
proposed by DEA on October 13, 1994
(59 FR 51888). In response to industry
concerns, the proposed regulations were
withdrawn on December 9, 1994 (59 FR
63738). After consulting with the
private sector and carefully considering
industry and other concerns, new
regulations regarding chemical mixtures
were proposed on September 16, 1998
(63 FR 49506). The comment period,
which was twice extended, closed on
April 16, 1999.
There are thousands of chemical
mixtures in legitimate commerce, the
majority of which are not useful to the
illicit laboratory operator. The NPRM
proposed criteria for the determination
of whether a chemical mixture would be
automatically exempt from CSA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
regulatory controls. Additionally, the
NPRM defined an application process
by which manufacturers may apply for
an exemption for chemical mixtures that
do not qualify for automatic exemption.
The DEA proposed that each chemical
be assigned a concentration limit that, if
found at or below the limit, will cause
the mixture to be treated as exempt from
specific provisions of the CSA. This
quantitative approach to identifying
regulated mixtures was considered
necessary due to the complexity of
chemical-based commodities and the
huge variety of products. These criteria
were expected to exempt the vast
majority of chemical mixtures
containing listed chemicals from
regulatory control. The NPRM included
the proposed creation of a ‘‘Table of
Concentration Limits,’’ in 21 CFR
1310.12. This table lists the
concentration limits for each listed
chemical.
In recognition that not all mixtures
that qualify for exemption can be
identified by concentration or category,
the DEA also proposed an application
process to exempt additional mixtures
which are not likely to be diverted for
use in the illicit production of
controlled substances.
DEA originally proposed a
concentration limit of two percent for
chemical mixtures containing ephedrine
and/or pseudoephedrine. However,
based on the comments received from
the NPRM (63 FR 49506, Sept. 16,
1998), DEA determined that a five
percent concentration limit would be
more appropriate. On May 1, 2003, DEA
published a Final Rule (68 FR 23195)
which established a concentration limit
of five percent for chemical mixtures
which contain ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine.
If the concentration of the total
ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine was
at or below the five percent limit in a
chemical mixture, the mixture was
automatically exempted from the
registration, reporting, recordkeeping
and security requirements of the CSA.
That Final Rule primarily addressed
those chemicals encountered in dietary
and nutritional supplements.
The May 1, 2003, Final Rule also
established an exemption for the
category of products consisting of
unaltered harvested plant material in 21
CFR 1310.12(d)(1). Finally, that rule
provided for a process whereby a
manufacturer of a product which would
otherwise be subject to regulation may
request an exemption for that specific
product. This process allows chemical
mixtures not automatically exempt by
the concentration limit to be considered
for exempt status under the CSA.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Recent FDA Action Pertaining to Dietary
Supplements Containing Ephedrine
Alkaloids
In 2004, FDA issued a Final Rule
declaring dietary supplements
containing ephedrine alkaloids
‘‘adulterated’’ under the FFD&C Act (69
FR 6787, February 11, 2004). FDA
issued this rule after concluding that
these products present an unreasonable
risk of illness or injury. FDA’s Final
Rule prohibits the sale of these products
and FDA has been seizing dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids since the Final Rule became
effective in April 2004. The FDA Final
Rule addressed the marketing of dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids; it did not address the
importation, exportation, manufacture
or distribution of ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine chemical mixtures
with concentration limits at or below
five percent, if the chemical mixture is
not being marketed as a dietary
supplement containing ephedrine
alkaloids. DEA notes that there yet may
be legitimate uses for such mixtures. As
there yet may be legitimate uses for
chemical mixtures with concentration
limits at or below 5 percent, the
importation, exportation, manufacture,
and distribution of these chemical
mixtures (for purposes other than use in
dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids) are not prohibited
by either FDA’s ban regarding the
marketing of such dietary supplements
or by DEA law and regulations. In spite
of FDA’s ban, and corresponding
reduction in legitimate need for these
chemical mixtures, DEA has seen a
significant increase in the number of
import requests for ephedra, sparking a
concern that these chemical mixtures
are being diverted for use in the illicit
manufacture of methamphetamine.
Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic
Act of 2005 (CMEA)
On March 9, 2006, the President
signed the USA PATRIOT Improvement
and Reauthorization Act of 2005 which
included the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA) (Title VII
of Pub. L. 109–177). The CMEA placed
additional controls on ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine and tasked DEA with
limiting the domestic production and
importation of ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine materials to quantities
necessary for medical, scientific and
other legitimate purposes (21 U.S.C. 826
and 952(a)(1) as amended).
The CMEA imposed new
requirements regarding the retail sale of
scheduled listed chemical products
(products containing ephedrine,
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
pseudoephedrine, or
phenylpropanolamine, that may be
marketed or distributed lawfully in the
United States under the FFD&CA as
nonprescription products). In a separate
rulemaking, ‘‘Retail Sales of Scheduled
Listed Chemical Products; SelfCertification of Regulated Sellers of
Scheduled Listed Chemical Products’’
[Docket No. DEA–291, RIN 1117–AB05]
(71 FR 56008, September 26, 2006;
corrected at 71 FR 60609, October 13,
2006), DEA promulgated regulations
implementing these provisions. The
CMEA also subjects material containing
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and
phenylpropanolamine to manufacturing
and import restrictions. Specifically, the
CMEA requires that importers of all
listed chemicals provide DEA with
information regarding the transferee,
(i.e., the downstream customer) of the
chemical, as well as information
regarding the quantity of the chemical to
be transferred. Importers are further
required to provide DEA with a return
declaration regarding each import after
the transaction is completed (CMEA
section 716, 21 U.S.C. 971(d) and (g), as
amended). In a separate rulemaking,
‘‘Implementation of the Combat
Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of
2005; Notice of Transfers Following
Importation or Exportation’’ [Docket No.
DEA–292, RIN 1117–AB06] (72 FR
17401, April 9, 2007; Temporary Stay of
Certain Provisions 72 FR 28601, May 22,
2007), DEA promulgated regulations
implementing these provisions. Further,
the CMEA requires that the notice of
importation (DEA Form 486) for
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine ‘‘shall include all
information known to the importer on
the chain of distribution of such
chemical from the manufacturer to the
importer.’’ (CMEA section 721, 21
U.S.C. 971(h) as amended). In a separate
rulemaking, ‘‘Information of Foreign
Chain of Distribution for Certain List I
Chemicals’’ [Docket No. DEA–295, RIN
1117–AB07], DEA is promulgating
regulations to implement this provision.
Finally, the CMEA requires DEA to
establish import and production quotas
for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine (CMEA sections
713 and 715, 21 U.S.C. 826 and 952 as
amended). In a separate rulemaking,
‘‘Import and Production Quotas for
Certain List I Chemicals’’ [Docket No.
DEA–293, RIN 1117–AB08] (72 FR
37439, July 10, 2007) DEA promulgated
regulations to implement these
provisions.
DEA is removing the exemption for
five percent ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine, in part, to fulfill the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Congressional mandate of restricting
such material to quantities necessary for
medical, scientific, and other legitimate
purposes (21 U.S.C. 826 and 952(a)(1) as
amended). Without removing the
exemption for these products, DEA
would be unable to effectively limit the
importation of ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine, as required by the
CMEA.
Present Concerns: Use at Illicit
Laboratories
DEA is also authorized to remove an
exemption for particular exempt
chemical mixtures if it finds evidence of
diversion pursuant to 21 CFR
1310.12(e). This regulation provides that
should DEA find such evidence, it can
‘‘issue, and publish in the Federal
Register, notification of the removal of
an exemption.’’ Interested parties are
invited to file written comments or
objections to the order within 60 days
of the date of publication. If any
comment or objection raises ‘‘significant
issues regarding any finding of fact or
conclusion of law upon which the order
is based, [DEA] shall immediately
suspend the effectiveness of the order’’
and reconsider the application for
exemption in light of the comments
received.
At most methamphetamine
laboratories seized in the U.S., the
precursor material was obtained via the
diversion of OTC ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine products marketed in
tablet and capsule form. While the vast
majority of products seized at illicit
methamphetamine laboratories were
OTC drug products, ephedra and ma
huang extracts containing ephedrine, Nmethylephedrine, Nmethylpseudoephedrine,
norpseudoephedrine,
phenylpropanolamine, and
pseudoephedrine, and dietary
supplement products (containing
ephedra and ma huang extracts) have
been seized. At this time, the frequency
with which these dietary supplement
products and extracts are encountered is
small. From 1998 through 2005, DEA
has documented 20 methamphetamine
laboratories where ephedra materials
have been seized. The source of
precursor chemicals in a seized
clandestine laboratory is often not
evident, so it is likely that the number
of seized laboratories that used such
mixtures is actually greater. Ephedra,
therefore, can and is being diverted for
use as a precursor material for the illicit
production of methamphetamine. Were
DEA not to regulate chemical mixtures
containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine at or below the
current five percent concentration limit,
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40741
DEA is concerned that these products
would be more widely diverted for
illicit production of methamphetamine,
particularly as traffickers look for easilyobtainable product due to the new retail
sales, quota and import restrictions
imposed by CMEA.
DEA Concerns Regarding Recent
Importations
Recently DEA has seen an increasing
number of requests for importation of
large shipments of ephedra material in
concentrations below the five percent
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine
exemption limit. Traditionally, such
ephedra extract material has always
been between 6–8 percent ephedrine
and/or pseudoephedrine.
As noted above, DEA has seen
chemical mixtures with concentration
limits of ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine at or below five
percent in clandestine
methamphetamine laboratories.
Subsequent to implementing regulations
which allowed an exemption for below
five percent material, DEA has
witnessed increased ability of
clandestine laboratory operators to
extract ephedrine and pseudoephedrine
from various bulk materials (including
low concentration mixtures). These
extraction procedures are shared via the
Internet. While these mixtures may
contain low concentrations of ephedrine
and/or pseudoephedrine, they can be a
ready source of supply for
methamphetamine traffickers.
Therefore, due to the existing
clandestine methamphetamine
laboratory problem and the illicit use of
extracts and dietary supplements
(containing ephedrine and related List I
chemicals) as precursor material for the
clandestine production of
methamphetamine, and the new
limitations imposed by the CMEA, DEA
is removing the exemption for chemical
mixtures having a total concentration of
less than (or equal to) five percent
ephedrine or pseudoephedrine and is
removing the exemption for unaltered
ephedra plant material.
Action Taken in This Interim Rule
This Interim Rule announces the
removal of the exemption for chemical
mixtures having a total concentration of
ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine of
five percent (or less). By removing these
exemptions, all chemical mixtures
containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine will be regulated
chemical mixtures subject to control
under the Controlled Substances Act,
including registration, recordkeeping,
reporting, and security controls. This
action will be effective August 24, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
40742
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
This rulemaking also removes the
exemption for the category of products
consisting of harvested plant material
which is specified in 21 CFR
1310.12(d)(1). Harvested plant material
(i.e., ephedra) that contains ephedrine,
N-methylephedrine, Nmethylpseudoephedrine,
norpseudoephedrine,
phenylpropanolamine, and/or
pseudoephedrine, meeting the
definition of chemical mixture, shall no
longer be exempt from CSA provisions,
even when the plant material is
unaltered from its natural state.
II. Provisions Specifically Applying to
Regulated Chemical Mixtures
Containing These List I Chemicals
Effective August 24, 2007, any
chemical mixture that contains
ephedrine or pseudoephedrine will be
treated as a List I chemical. Transactions
that meet or exceed the cumulative
monthly threshold for the listed
chemical, set forth at 21 CFR 1310.04,
shall be regulated transactions. Persons
interested in handling a regulated
mixture must comply with the
following:
Registration. Any person who
manufactures, distributes, imports or
exports a regulated mixture, or proposes
to engage in such activities, with respect
to a regulated mixture containing a List
I chemical, shall obtain a registration
pursuant to the CSA (21 U.S.C. 822).
Regulations describing registration for
List I chemical handlers are set forth in
21 CFR part 1309.
Separate registration is required for
manufacture, distribution, importing,
and exporting. A separate registration is
required for each principal place of
business at one general physical
location where List I chemicals are
manufactured, distributed, imported, or
exported by a person (21 CFR 1309.23).
Effective August 24, 2007, any person
manufacturing, distributing, importing,
or exporting any amount of a regulated
mixture will become subject to the
registration requirement under the CSA.
DEA recognizes, however, that it is not
possible for persons who are subject to
the registration requirement to
immediately complete and submit an
application for registration and for DEA
to immediately issue registrations for
those activities. Therefore, in order to
allow continued legitimate commerce in
regulated mixtures, DEA is establishing
in 21 CFR 1310.09 a temporary
exemption from the registration
requirement for persons desiring to
engage in activities with regulated
mixtures, provided that DEA receives a
properly completed application for
registration on or before August 24,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
2007. The temporary exemption for
such persons will remain in effect until
DEA takes final action on their
application for registration.
The temporary exemption applies
solely to the registration requirement;
all other chemical control requirements,
including recordkeeping and reporting,
are effective on August 24, 2007.
Therefore, all transactions of chemical
mixtures containing ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine will be regulated, if at
or above threshold, while an application
for registration or exemption is pending.
This is necessary because not regulating
these transactions could result in
increased diversion of chemicals
desirable to drug traffickers.
Additionally, the temporary
exemption does not suspend applicable
federal criminal laws relating to the
regulated mixture, nor does it supersede
state or local laws or regulations. All
handlers of a regulated mixture must
comply with applicable state and local
requirements in addition to the CSA
regulatory controls.
Records and Reports. The CSA (21
U.S.C. 830) requires certain records to
be kept and reports to be made
involving listed chemicals. Regulations
describing recordkeeping and reporting
requirements are set forth in 21 CFR
Part 1310. A record must be made and
maintained for two years after the date
of a regulated transaction involving a
List I chemical. Only a distribution,
receipt, sale, importation, exportation,
brokerage or trade of a regulated mixture
above the established threshold is a
regulated transaction (21 CFR
1300.02(b)(28)).
Each regulated bulk manufacturer of a
regulated mixture shall submit
manufacturing, inventory, and use data
on an annual basis (21 CFR 1310.05(d)).
Bulk manufacturers producing the
mixture solely for internal consumption,
e.g. formulating a nonregulated mixture,
are not required to submit this
information. Existing standard industry
reports containing the required
information are acceptable, provided the
information is readily retrievable from
the report.
21 CFR 1310.05 requires that each
regulated person shall report to DEA
any regulated transaction involving an
extraordinary quantity, an uncommon
method of payment or delivery, or any
other circumstance that causes the
regulated person to believe that the
listed chemical will be used in violation
of the CSA. Section 1310.03(c) requires
that regulated persons who engage in a
transaction with a nonregulated person
or who engage in an export transaction
that involves ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine, including drug
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
products containing these chemicals,
and uses or attempts to use the Postal
Service or any private or commercial
carrier must file monthly reports of each
such transaction.
Imports/Exports. All imports/exports
and brokered transactions of regulated
mixtures containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine shall comply with the
CSA (21 U.S.C. 952, 957 and 971).
Regulations for importation and
exportation of List I chemicals are
described in 21 CFR part 1313. Separate
registration is necessary for each activity
(21 CFR 1309.22).
Security. Regulated persons must
provide effective controls and
procedures to guard against theft and
diversion of regulated mixtures.
Regulated persons must store the
regulated mixtures in containers sealed
so that tampering will be evident; if the
mixture cannot be stored in a sealed
container, access to the chemicals must
be controlled (21 CFR 1309.71).
Administrative Inspection. Places,
including factories, warehouses, or
other establishments and conveyances,
where regulated persons may lawfully
hold, manufacture, or distribute,
dispense, administer, or otherwise
dispose of a regulated mixture or where
records relating to those activities are
maintained, are controlled premises as
defined in 21 CFR 1316.02(c). The CSA
(21 U.S.C. 880) allows for administrative
inspections of these controlled premises
as provided in 21 CFR Part 1316
Subpart A.
Regulatory Certifications
Administrative Procedure Act
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) generally requires that agencies,
prior to issuing a new rule, publish a
notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register. The APA also
provides, however, that agencies may be
excepted from this requirement when
‘‘the agency for good cause finds (and
incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the
rules issued) that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
With publication of this interim rule,
DEA is invoking this ‘‘good cause’’
exception to the APA’s notice
requirement based on the combination
of several extraordinary factors. Section
713 of the CMEA (21 U.S.C. 826 as
amended) requires the establishment of
production quotas for the List I
chemicals ephedrine, pseudoephedrine,
and phenylpropanolamine. DEA
implemented these requirements in a
separate rulemaking, ‘‘Import and
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Production Quotas for Certain List I
Chemicals’’ [Docket No. DEA–293, RIN
1117–AB08] (72 FR 37439, July 10,
2007). DEA cannot establish such quotas
if certain products containing these List
I chemicals are not regulated. To not
regulate these products while at the
same time establishing production
quotas would create a loophole which
traffickers could exploit domestically.
CMEA also mandates that imports of
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine are prohibited
except for such quantities as the
Attorney General (DEA by delegation)
finds necessary to provide for medical,
scientific, or other legitimate purposes
(CMEA section 715, 21 U.S.C. 952 as
amended). DEA is further required to
establish import quotas for these three
List I chemicals. In order for DEA to
establish quotas and meet its obligation
to prohibit imports except those
necessary to provide for a medical,
scientific, or other legitimate purpose,
as required by the CMEA, DEA must
exercise regulatory control over
chemical mixtures containing
pseudoephedrine and ephedrine. To
exercise this control, DEA must
eliminate the exemption for chemical
mixtures containing these List I
chemicals.
DEA is concerned about the
increasing number of requests for
importation of below-five percent
ephedrine or pseudoephedrine material.
After the recent FDA action which bans
dietary supplements containing such
material, DEA has not been able to
determine the legitimate need for
importation of such material. Therefore,
in an effort to eliminate the
undocumented importation and
domestic distribution of such material,
and to comply with all of the new
requirements imposed by the CMEA
discussed above, DEA is removing these
exemptions.
As has been discussed previously in
this rulemaking, DEA has seized
chemical mixtures containing ephedrine
and/or pseudoephedrine with
concentrations of less than five percent
at 20 domestic clandestine laboratories
over the past several years. The source
of precursor chemicals in a seized
clandestine laboratory is often not
evident, so it is likely that the number
of seized laboratories that used such
mixtures is actually greater. Further, the
CMEA specifically prohibits all
importation of ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine except those
quantities which the Attorney General
finds to be necessary for medical,
scientific, and other legitimate
purposes. These seizures, coupled with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
the new requirements limiting
importation of ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine, as well as the
establishment of production and import
quotas for these three List I chemicals,
necessitate that DEA remove the
concentration limit for these previously
exempt chemical mixtures. Engaging in
traditional notice and comment
rulemaking would prevent DEA from
complying with the mandates of CMEA
to limit the importation and domestic
production of these materials.
Were DEA not to regulate chemical
mixtures containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine at or below the
current five percent concentration limit,
DEA is concerned that these products
would be more widely diverted for
illicit production of methamphetamine,
particularly with the new quota and
import restrictions imposed by CMEA.
Accordingly, DEA finds that it is
impracticable to conduct notice and
comment rulemaking regarding the
removal of the exemption for chemical
mixtures with concentration limits at or
below the current five percent limit. If
DEA did not act in this manner,
traffickers would have ready access to
chemical mixtures which DEA has
demonstrated are being used currently
to illicitly manufacture
methamphetamine. Allowing such illicit
manufacture to continue during the
pendancy of rulemaking would be
contrary to the public interest and the
intent of the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005. The broad scope
of the new law, as well as the expedited
effective dates, is a clear reflection of
Congress’ concern about the nation’s
growing methamphetamine epidemic
and its desire to act quickly to prevent
further illicit use of these chemicals.
In light of these factors, DEA finds
that ‘‘good cause’’ exists to issue this
interim rule without engaging in
traditional notice and comment
rulemaking. In so doing, DEA recognizes
that exceptions to the APA’s notice and
comment procedures are to be
‘‘narrowly construed and only
reluctantly countenanced.’’ Am. Fed’n
of Gov’t Employees v. Block, 655 F2d
1153, 1156 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (quoting
New Jersey Dep’t of Envt. Prot. v. EPA,
626 F.2d 1038, 1045 (D.C. Cir. 1980)).
Based on the totality of the
circumstances associated with the
CMEA, DEA finds that invocation of the
‘‘good cause’’ exception is justified.
Further, the APA also provides that,
while agencies are generally required to
publish final rules at least 30 days
before they become effective, they may
be exempt from this requirement as well
‘‘for good cause found and published
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40743
with the rule.’’ 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). As
discussed previously, DEA has recently
seen a significant increase in the
number of requests for importation of
large quantities of these chemical
mixtures. After the recent FDA action
which bans dietary supplements
containing such material, DEA has not
been able to determine the legitimate
need for importation of such material.
DEA is concerned about the potential
illicit use of such material for
clandestine methamphetamine
manufacture, particularly as traffickers
look for easily-obtainable product due to
the retail sales limits recently imposed
by the CMEA. Delaying the effective
date of this rule could provide a
significant loophole for domestic illicit
methamphetamine manufacturers to
take advantage of for their illegal
activities. Therefore, DEA finds good
cause not to delay the effective date of
this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator hereby
certifies that this rulemaking has been
drafted in accordance with the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 605(b)). The (RFA)
applies to rules that are subject to notice
and comment. As explained above, DEA
has determined that public notice and
comment are not necessary.
Consequently, the RFA does not apply.
DEA notes, however, that as explained
in the discussion under Executive Order
12866, the costs of this rule are low,
requiring only registration, maintenance
of records, reports on unusual
transactions, thefts or losses, and mail
order transactions, and security. Other
than the registration fee and the reports,
these requirements can generally be met
by standard business practices.
DEA has determined that dietary
supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids, including bulk material used
to formulate these supplements, are the
principal chemical mixtures that
contain ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine. Dietary supplements
containing such ephedrine alkaloids
have been banned by FDA. Due to (1)
The CMEA mandate that DEA limit the
domestic production and importation of
materials containing ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine to quantities
necessary for medical, scientific and
other legitimate purposes; (2) the
elimination of the previous lawful status
of such products as dietary
supplements; and (3) the potential illicit
use of such products as precursor
material for illicit production of
methamphetamine, DEA is removing the
exemption for low concentration
material, including harvested plant
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
40744
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
material. This industry is comprised
mainly of small businesses, as defined
by U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) regulations (13 CFR part 121).
However, the lawful marketing of
dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids has been banned by
FDA. As such, this regulatory action is
not expected to impact any
manufacturers whose product can still
lawfully be marketed under the
FFD&CA. Persons who import or
distribute chemical mixtures containing
ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine at or
below the previously-exempt five
percent concentration limit will be
affected by this rule. This rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
those persons. However, DEA is seeking
comment specifically regarding the
potential impacts of this regulation.
DEA is not prohibiting the
importation, exportation, manufacture,
or distribution of chemical mixtures
containing ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine in concentrations less
than or equal to five percent. Rather,
DEA is regulating the importation,
exportation, manufacture, and
distribution of these chemical mixtures
by requiring persons who handle these
chemical mixtures to register with DEA,
maintain certain records common to
business practice, and file certain
reports, regarding these chemical
mixtures. Chemical mixtures containing
the List I chemicals ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine will still be available
for use.
date of shipment; all of this information
is available from standard business and
shipping records. These reports may be
filed electronically. The security
requirements do not exceed standard
business practices for the protection of
both the security and quality of these
products. DEA has not determined the
number of firms potentially affected by
the rule, but does not expect it to be
high.
Executive Order 12866
This regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, section 1(b), Principles of
Regulation. DEA has determined that
this rule is a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and
Review, and accordingly this rule has
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
The rule will impose relatively low
costs on regulated persons. Other than
the annual registration fee of $1,247,
there are few costs associated with the
rule. The records required on regulated
transactions can be met with standard
business records. Reports on unusual
sales, thefts, and losses will be filed
infrequently by any one person. Those
who sell covered mixtures and deliver
them to the end user through the mail
or other delivery services will have to
file a monthly report. The monthly
report requires only the registrant’s
name and registration number, the
purchaser’s name and address, the
shipping address (if different), the name
and quantity of the chemical, and the
Paperwork Reduction Act
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:01 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or
modify any provision of state law; nor
does it impose enforcement
responsibilities on any state; nor does it
diminish the power of any state to
enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this
rulemaking does not have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13132.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $120,000,000 or more
(adjusted for inflation) in any one year,
and will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under
the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
The Drug Enforcement
Administration is eliminating the
current exemption for chemical
mixtures with concentration limits of
the List I chemicals ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine of less than or equal to
five percent. This means that all
chemical mixtures containing the List I
chemicals ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine are regulated chemical
mixtures, regardless of concentration
limits.
Due to this change in the regulations,
all persons who import, export,
manufacture, or distribute chemical
mixtures containing these two List I
chemicals will be required to register
with DEA. They will also be required to
file reports regarding certain
transactions, should certain criteria be
met.
DEA does, however, provide a
mechanism whereby a person may seek
an exemption from these regulatory
requirements for a specific chemical
mixture, if DEA determines that such a
chemical mixture cannot be used by
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
traffickers to manufacture controlled
substances illicitly.
DEA notes that the lawful marketing
of dietary supplements containing this
material has been banned by FDA. As
such, this regulatory action is expected
to impact no manufacturers, whose
product can still lawfully be marketed
under the FFD&CA.
Therefore, as the impact of this
regulation is minimal, DEA is making
minor adjustments to the OMB
information collections entitled
‘‘Application for Registration Under
Domestic Chemical Diversion Control
Act of 1993 and Renewal Application
for Registration under Domestic
Chemical Diversion Control Act of
1993’’ (OMB control number 1117–
0031, DEA Form 510), ‘‘Report of Mail
Order Transactions’’ (OMB control
number 1117–0033), and ‘‘Import/
Export Declaration for List I and List II
Chemicals’’ (OMB control number
1117–0023). DEA is specifically seeking
comment regarding the number of
persons who may be affected by this
regulation.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by Section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Congressional
Review Act). This rule will not result in
an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1310
Drug traffic control, Exports, Imports,
List I and List II chemicals, Reporting
and Recordkeeping requirements.
I For the reasons set out above, 21 CFR
part 1310 is amended as follows:
PART 1310—RECORDS AND
REPORTS OF LISTED CHEMICALS
AND CERTAIN MACHINES [AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 1310
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802, 827(h), 830,
871(b), 890.
2. Section 1310.09 is amended by
adding a new paragraph (j) to read as
follows:
I
§ 1310.09 Temporary exemption from
registration.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Each person required by section
302 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 822) to obtain
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
40745
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
a registration to manufacture, distribute,
import, or export regulated chemical
mixtures which contain ephedrine, and/
or pseudoephedrine, pursuant to
Sections 1310.12 and 1310.13, is
temporarily exempted from the
registration requirement, provided that
DEA receives a properly completed
application for registration or
application for exemption on or before
August 24, 2007. The exemption will
remain in effect for each person who has
made such application until the
Administration has approved or denied
that application. This exemption applies
only to registration; all other chemical
control requirements set forth in parts
1309, 1310, 1313, and 1315 of this
chapter remain in full force and effect.
Any person who manufactures,
distributes, imports, or exports a
chemical mixture whose application for
exemption is subsequently denied by
DEA must obtain a registration with
DEA. A temporary exemption from the
registration requirement will also be
provided for these persons, provided
that DEA receives a properly completed
application for registration on or before
30 days following the date of official
DEA notification that the application for
exemption has not been approved. The
temporary exemption for such persons
will remain in effect until DEA takes
final action on their registration
application.
3. Section 1310.12 is amended as
follows:
I
A. By revising the Table of
Concentration Limits in paragraph (c) by
revising the entries for ‘‘Ephedrine, its
salts, optical isomers, and salts of
optical isomers’’ and ‘‘Pseudoephedrine,
its salts, optical isomers, and salts of
optical isomers’’; and
I
B. By removing paragraph (d)(1) and
redesignating paragraphs (d)(2) through
(d)(5) as paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(4)
as follows:
I
§ 1310.12
*
Exempt chemical mixtures.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE OF CONCENTRATION LIMITS
DEA chemical
code number
Concentration
(percent)
Special conditions
List I Chemicals
*
*
*
Ephedrine, its salts, optical isomers, and salts of
optical isomers.
8113
*
*
Not exempt at any concentration.
*
*
Chemical mixtures containing any amount of
ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine, and their
salts, optical isomers and salts of optical isomers are not exempt due to concentration, unless otherwise exempted.
*
*
*
Pseudoephedrine, its salts, optical isomers, and
salts of optical isomers.
8112
*
*
Not exempt at any concentration.
*
*
Chemical mixtures containing any amount of
ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine, and their
salts, optical isomers and salts of optical isomers are not exempt due to concentration, unless otherwise exempted.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
List II Chemicals
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Dated: July 2, 2007.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–14295 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 202
[Docket No. RM 2007–7]
Technical Amendments to online
registration of claims to copyright;
corrections
Copyright Office, Library of
Congress
ACTION: Interim Regulations for online
registration; correction.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office
published in the Federal Register on
July 6, 2007, an interim regulation
implementing an online copyright
registration system. This document
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:55 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
makes technical corrections to that
interim regulation.
DATES: Effective on July 25, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tanya Sandros, Acting General Counsel,
or Nanette Petruzzelli, Special Legal
Advisor to the Register for
Reengineering, Copyright Office, Library
of Congress, Washington, DC 20540.
Telephone: (202) 707–8380. Telefax:
(202) 707–8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Copyright Office published an interim
regulation in the Federal Register on
July 6, 2007, which, for the purpose of
implementing an online registration
system, amended its regulations
governing the procedures by which the
public submits, and the Office
processes, copyright registrations and
E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM
25JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 25, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40738-40745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14295]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1310
[Docket No. DEA-284I]
RIN 1117-AB11
Elimination of Exemptions for Chemical Mixtures Containing the
List I Chemicals Ephedrine and/or Pseudoephedrine
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department of Justice.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Interim Rule removes the Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
exemptions for chemical mixtures containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine with concentration limits at or below five percent. The
Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA) added additional
controls on ephedrine and pseudoephedrine and mandated that DEA limit
the domestic production and importation of materials containing
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine to quantities necessary for medical,
scientific and other legitimate purposes (21 U.S.C. 952(a)(1) as
amended). DEA is eliminating exemptions for these chemical mixtures. As
such, all ephedrine and pseudoephedrine chemical mixtures, regardless
of concentration and form, shall be subject to the regulatory
provisions of the CSA.
DEA is not prohibiting the importation, exportation, manufacture,
or distribution of chemical mixtures containing ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine in concentrations less than or equal to five percent.
Rather, DEA is regulating the importation, exportation, manufacture,
and distribution of these chemical mixtures by requiring persons who
handle these chemical mixtures to register with DEA, maintain certain
records common to business practice, and file certain reports,
regarding these chemical mixtures. Chemical mixtures containing the
List I chemicals ephedrine and pseudoephedrine will still be available
for use.
DATES: Effective August 24, 2007.
Persons seeking registration must apply on or before August 24,
2007 in order to continue their business pending final action by DEA on
their application. Written comments must be postmarked, and electronic
comments must be sent, on or before September 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference
``Docket No. DEA-284I'' on all written and electronic correspondence.
Written comments being sent via regular mail should be sent to the
Deputy Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration, Washington, DC
20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL. Written
comments sent via express mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters,
Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 2401 Jefferson-
Davis Highway, Alexandria, VA 22301. Comments may be sent directly to
DEA electronically by sending an electronic message to
dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov. Comments may also be sent
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov using the electronic
comment form provided on that site. An electronic copy of this document
is also available at the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. DEA will
accept attachments to electronic comments in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file formats only. DEA will not accept
any file format other than those specifically listed here.
Posting of Public Comments: Please note that all comments received
are considered part of the public record and made available for public
inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying information (for example, name, address,
etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as
your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it
to be posted online, you must include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also
place all the personal identifying information you do not want posted
online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify the
information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as part of
your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must include
the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment
has so much confidential business information that it cannot be
effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted on
https://www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information and confidential business
information identified and located as set forth above will be redacted
and placed in the agency's public docket file, and, where possible,
posted online. If you wish to inspect the agency's public docket file
in person by appointment, please see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
paragraph.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Sannerud, PhD, Chief,
Drug & Chemical Evaluation Section, Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration, Washington, DC 20537, telephone (202) 307-
7183, fax (202) 353-1263, or e-mail ode@dea.usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Status of Dietary Supplements Containing Ephedrine and/or
Pseudoephedrine
Dietary supplements containing the List I chemicals ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine are regulated as chemical mixtures under the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA). DEA originally exempted these products from CSA
regulatory control if the total concentration of the ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine was at or below five percent, in an effort to reduce
the regulatory burden on the dietary and nutritional supplement
industry (68 FR 23195, May 1, 2003). However, on February 11, 2004, the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Final Rule (69 FR 6787)
declaring dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids
adulterated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FFD&C
Act) because these dietary supplements present an unreasonable risk of
illness or injury. Effective April 12, 2004, the rule prohibits the
sale of dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids such as
ephedra (also known as Ma Huang, sida cordifolia and pinellia). The
effect of the FDA rule was to ban the lawful marketing of these
products.
DEA notes that the FDA ban addresses only the marketing of dietary
supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids. The raw materials used to
manufacture these dietary supplements are not restricted by the FDA
ban. Accordingly, to control those materials, DEA must address the
importation, exportation, manufacture, or distribution of chemical
mixtures with
[[Page 40739]]
concentration limits of ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine at or below
five percent. The importation, exportation, manufacture, and
distribution of chemical mixtures with concentration limits at or below
five percent ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine are addressed by the CSA
and its implementing regulations. As there yet may be legitimate uses
for chemical mixtures with concentration limits at or below five
percent, the importation, exportation, manufacture, and distribution of
these chemical mixtures (for purposes other than use in dietary
supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids) are not prohibited by
either FDA's ban regarding the marketing of such dietary supplements or
by DEA law and regulations. Accordingly, as discussed further below,
for DEA to regulate the importation, exportation, manufacture, and
distribution of chemical mixtures containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine with concentration limits at or below five percent, DEA
must remove these chemical mixtures from their exempt status under CSA
regulations.
DEA recognizes that ephedra materials containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine are used legitimately by practitioners of Traditional
Chinese Medicine. This rulemaking does not restrict the utilization of
such material for such legitimate purposes. This rulemaking will simply
require importers and suppliers of such material to comply with DEA
recordkeeping, registration, quota and import/export requirements.
Plant Material Included in This Regulatory Action
The ephedrine alkaloids, including, among others, ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, norephedrine, N-methylephedrine, norpseudoephedrine,
N-methylpseudoephedrine, are chemical stimulants that occur naturally
in some botanicals, but can be synthetically derived. The ingredient
sources of the ephedrine alkaloids include raw botanicals (i.e.,
plants) and extracts from botanicals. Ma Huang, ephedra, Chinese
Ephedra, and epitonin are several names used for botanical ingredients,
primarily from Ephedra sinica Stapf, ephedra equisetina Bunge, Ephedra
intermedia var. tibetica Stapf and Ephedra distachya Linne. (the
Ephedras), that are sources of ephedrine alkaloids (including ephedrine
and pseudoephedrine). Other plant sources that contain such ephedrine
alkaloids include Sida cordifolia L. and Pinellia ternata (Thunb.)
Makino. Common names that have been used for the various plants that
contain ephedrine alkaloids include sea grape, yellow horse, joint fir,
popotillo, and country mallow. Although the proportions of the various
ephedrine alkaloids in botanical species vary from one species to
another, in most species used commercially, ephedrine is typically the
predominant alkaloid in the raw material. In addition to chemical
mixtures from synthetic sources, this rulemaking includes those plant
sources that contain the ephedrine alkaloids, ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine.
The names desert herb, squaw tea, Brigham tea, and Mormon tea refer
to North American species of ephedra that do not contain ephedrine
alkaloids but have been misused to identify ephedrine alkaloid
containing ingredients. This rulemaking does not pertain to species of
ephedra that do not contain ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine.
Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA)
On March 9, 2006, the President signed the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA), which is Title VII of the USA PATRIOT
Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005. The CMEA mandates that DEA
limit the domestic production and importation of materials containing
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine (including ephedra) to quantities
necessary for medical, scientific and other legitimate purposes (21
U.S.C. 826 and 952(a)(1) as amended). DEA is concerned about the
illicit use of ephedra type material in the clandestine production of
methamphetamine. While the legitimate market for dietary supplements
containing such material has been cut by FDA's recent action, DEA has
seen an increasing number of requests for importation of below-five
percent ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine material. DEA notes that there
may be legitimate uses for these chemical mixtures. However, in light
of FDA's action, DEA is concerned about the intended purpose of such
material, especially given that such material has been seized in
clandestine drug laboratories.
Chemical Mixture Regulatory Control History
The Chemical Diversion and Trafficking Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-
690) (CDTA) was passed by Congress to curtail the diversion of specific
chemicals used in the illicit manufacture of controlled substances. The
CDTA established recordkeeping and reporting requirements necessary for
DEA to identify and track chemical diversion. While the CDTA achieved
initial success in curtailing the diversion of chemicals, traffickers
soon found and took advantage of certain shortcomings in the law. In
the United States (U.S.), traffickers were able to obtain needed
supplies by purchasing products that were exempted from regulation
under the CDTA. Such products include chemical mixtures.
Chemical Mixture Definition
The CDTA created a definition of ``chemical mixture'' (21 U.S.C.
802(40)), and exempted chemical mixtures from the definition of
``regulated transaction.'' (21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi) as amended by
CMEA) Chemical mixtures are defined as ``a combination of two or more
chemical substances, at least one of which is not a list I chemical or
a List II chemical, except that such term does not include any
combination of a List I chemical or a List II chemical with another
chemical that is present solely as an impurity.'' (21 U.S.C. 802(40))
Chemical Mixtures Containing Ephedrine and Pseudoephedrine
Ephedrine and pseudoephedrine are List I chemicals. Listed
chemicals that are classified as List I chemicals are important to the
manufacture of controlled substances. Chemical mixtures containing both
these List I chemicals include dietary and nutritional supplements.
Prior to FDA's 2004 Final Rule, dietary and nutritional supplements
containing both of these chemicals were readily available in the U.S.,
commonly sold to the public in drug and grocery stores, health and
nutrition stores, and through direct marketing campaigns. These dietary
and nutritional supplements contained ephedra plant material, or
extracts from the ephedra plant. If these dietary and nutritional
supplements met certain criteria under the FFD&CA, they were not
recognized as drugs under the FFD&CA, but nonetheless were considered
to be chemical mixtures governed by DEA law and regulations. In
contrast, over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription drug products
containing these listed chemicals are not considered chemical mixtures
(as long as they are in final FDA approved labeled package form) and
instead are specifically addressed in 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(iv) and (v)
as amended by CMEA. Also see 21 CFR 1300.02(b)(28)(i).
Initial Chemical Mixture Controls
Prior to the Domestic Chemical Diversion Control Act of 1993
(DCDCA), enacted in April of 1994, transactions involving all chemical
mixtures
[[Page 40740]]
(including dietary supplements) were exempt from recordkeeping,
registration and other chemical regulatory control requirements of the
CSA. The DCDCA amended the CSA (21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(v)) to limit the
application of the above stated exemption and provided the Attorney
General with the authority to exempt a chemical mixture containing a
listed chemical if it is ``formulated in such a way that it cannot be
easily used in the illicit production of a controlled substance'' and
``the listed chemical or chemicals contained in the mixture cannot be
readily recovered.'' As such, only those chemical mixtures meeting
these criteria would be exempted from control. Until regulations which
delineated criteria and procedures for exempting specific chemical
mixtures were finalized, as a practical interpretation of the law, DEA
treated all chemical mixtures, including dietary and nutritional
supplements, as being exempt from the chemical regulatory requirements
of the CSA. (Note that OTC and prescription drug products are not
considered chemical mixtures and are addressed separately under 21
U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(iv)). Unless exempted pursuant to law and
regulations, the requirements for chemical mixtures included
registration for certain handlers of List I chemicals, recordkeeping,
reporting and security.
Concern Regarding Chemical Mixtures
Some chemical mixtures can be and have been used by traffickers in
the illicit manufacture of controlled substances. This exemption
provided traffickers with an unregulated source for obtaining these
chemicals. To address these problems, the DCDCA amended the exemption
to provide that only those chemical mixtures specified by regulation
would be exempt from the definition of ``regulated transaction.''
Regulations regarding the exemption of chemical mixtures were
initially proposed by DEA on October 13, 1994 (59 FR 51888). In
response to industry concerns, the proposed regulations were withdrawn
on December 9, 1994 (59 FR 63738). After consulting with the private
sector and carefully considering industry and other concerns, new
regulations regarding chemical mixtures were proposed on September 16,
1998 (63 FR 49506). The comment period, which was twice extended,
closed on April 16, 1999.
There are thousands of chemical mixtures in legitimate commerce,
the majority of which are not useful to the illicit laboratory
operator. The NPRM proposed criteria for the determination of whether a
chemical mixture would be automatically exempt from CSA regulatory
controls. Additionally, the NPRM defined an application process by
which manufacturers may apply for an exemption for chemical mixtures
that do not qualify for automatic exemption.
The DEA proposed that each chemical be assigned a concentration
limit that, if found at or below the limit, will cause the mixture to
be treated as exempt from specific provisions of the CSA. This
quantitative approach to identifying regulated mixtures was considered
necessary due to the complexity of chemical-based commodities and the
huge variety of products. These criteria were expected to exempt the
vast majority of chemical mixtures containing listed chemicals from
regulatory control. The NPRM included the proposed creation of a
``Table of Concentration Limits,'' in 21 CFR 1310.12. This table lists
the concentration limits for each listed chemical.
In recognition that not all mixtures that qualify for exemption can
be identified by concentration or category, the DEA also proposed an
application process to exempt additional mixtures which are not likely
to be diverted for use in the illicit production of controlled
substances.
DEA originally proposed a concentration limit of two percent for
chemical mixtures containing ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine. However,
based on the comments received from the NPRM (63 FR 49506, Sept. 16,
1998), DEA determined that a five percent concentration limit would be
more appropriate. On May 1, 2003, DEA published a Final Rule (68 FR
23195) which established a concentration limit of five percent for
chemical mixtures which contain ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine.
If the concentration of the total ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine
was at or below the five percent limit in a chemical mixture, the
mixture was automatically exempted from the registration, reporting,
recordkeeping and security requirements of the CSA. That Final Rule
primarily addressed those chemicals encountered in dietary and
nutritional supplements.
The May 1, 2003, Final Rule also established an exemption for the
category of products consisting of unaltered harvested plant material
in 21 CFR 1310.12(d)(1). Finally, that rule provided for a process
whereby a manufacturer of a product which would otherwise be subject to
regulation may request an exemption for that specific product. This
process allows chemical mixtures not automatically exempt by the
concentration limit to be considered for exempt status under the CSA.
Recent FDA Action Pertaining to Dietary Supplements Containing
Ephedrine Alkaloids
In 2004, FDA issued a Final Rule declaring dietary supplements
containing ephedrine alkaloids ``adulterated'' under the FFD&C Act (69
FR 6787, February 11, 2004). FDA issued this rule after concluding that
these products present an unreasonable risk of illness or injury. FDA's
Final Rule prohibits the sale of these products and FDA has been
seizing dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids since the
Final Rule became effective in April 2004. The FDA Final Rule addressed
the marketing of dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids; it
did not address the importation, exportation, manufacture or
distribution of ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine chemical mixtures with
concentration limits at or below five percent, if the chemical mixture
is not being marketed as a dietary supplement containing ephedrine
alkaloids. DEA notes that there yet may be legitimate uses for such
mixtures. As there yet may be legitimate uses for chemical mixtures
with concentration limits at or below 5 percent, the importation,
exportation, manufacture, and distribution of these chemical mixtures
(for purposes other than use in dietary supplements containing
ephedrine alkaloids) are not prohibited by either FDA's ban regarding
the marketing of such dietary supplements or by DEA law and
regulations. In spite of FDA's ban, and corresponding reduction in
legitimate need for these chemical mixtures, DEA has seen a significant
increase in the number of import requests for ephedra, sparking a
concern that these chemical mixtures are being diverted for use in the
illicit manufacture of methamphetamine.
Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA)
On March 9, 2006, the President signed the USA PATRIOT Improvement
and Reauthorization Act of 2005 which included the Combat
Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA) (Title VII of Pub. L. 109-
177). The CMEA placed additional controls on ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine and tasked DEA with limiting the domestic production
and importation of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine materials to
quantities necessary for medical, scientific and other legitimate
purposes (21 U.S.C. 826 and 952(a)(1) as amended).
The CMEA imposed new requirements regarding the retail sale of
scheduled listed chemical products (products containing ephedrine,
[[Page 40741]]
pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine, that may be marketed or
distributed lawfully in the United States under the FFD&CA as
nonprescription products). In a separate rulemaking, ``Retail Sales of
Scheduled Listed Chemical Products; Self-Certification of Regulated
Sellers of Scheduled Listed Chemical Products'' [Docket No. DEA-291,
RIN 1117-AB05] (71 FR 56008, September 26, 2006; corrected at 71 FR
60609, October 13, 2006), DEA promulgated regulations implementing
these provisions. The CMEA also subjects material containing ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine to manufacturing and import
restrictions. Specifically, the CMEA requires that importers of all
listed chemicals provide DEA with information regarding the transferee,
(i.e., the downstream customer) of the chemical, as well as information
regarding the quantity of the chemical to be transferred. Importers are
further required to provide DEA with a return declaration regarding
each import after the transaction is completed (CMEA section 716, 21
U.S.C. 971(d) and (g), as amended). In a separate rulemaking,
``Implementation of the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005;
Notice of Transfers Following Importation or Exportation'' [Docket No.
DEA-292, RIN 1117-AB06] (72 FR 17401, April 9, 2007; Temporary Stay of
Certain Provisions 72 FR 28601, May 22, 2007), DEA promulgated
regulations implementing these provisions. Further, the CMEA requires
that the notice of importation (DEA Form 486) for ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine ``shall include all
information known to the importer on the chain of distribution of such
chemical from the manufacturer to the importer.'' (CMEA section 721, 21
U.S.C. 971(h) as amended). In a separate rulemaking, ``Information of
Foreign Chain of Distribution for Certain List I Chemicals'' [Docket
No. DEA-295, RIN 1117-AB07], DEA is promulgating regulations to
implement this provision. Finally, the CMEA requires DEA to establish
import and production quotas for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine (CMEA sections 713 and 715, 21 U.S.C. 826 and 952
as amended). In a separate rulemaking, ``Import and Production Quotas
for Certain List I Chemicals'' [Docket No. DEA-293, RIN 1117-AB08] (72
FR 37439, July 10, 2007) DEA promulgated regulations to implement these
provisions.
DEA is removing the exemption for five percent ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine, in part, to fulfill the Congressional mandate of
restricting such material to quantities necessary for medical,
scientific, and other legitimate purposes (21 U.S.C. 826 and 952(a)(1)
as amended). Without removing the exemption for these products, DEA
would be unable to effectively limit the importation of ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine, as required by the CMEA.
Present Concerns: Use at Illicit Laboratories
DEA is also authorized to remove an exemption for particular exempt
chemical mixtures if it finds evidence of diversion pursuant to 21 CFR
1310.12(e). This regulation provides that should DEA find such
evidence, it can ``issue, and publish in the Federal Register,
notification of the removal of an exemption.'' Interested parties are
invited to file written comments or objections to the order within 60
days of the date of publication. If any comment or objection raises
``significant issues regarding any finding of fact or conclusion of law
upon which the order is based, [DEA] shall immediately suspend the
effectiveness of the order'' and reconsider the application for
exemption in light of the comments received.
At most methamphetamine laboratories seized in the U.S., the
precursor material was obtained via the diversion of OTC ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine products marketed in tablet and capsule form. While the
vast majority of products seized at illicit methamphetamine
laboratories were OTC drug products, ephedra and ma huang extracts
containing ephedrine, N-methylephedrine, N-methylpseudoephedrine,
norpseudoephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, and pseudoephedrine, and
dietary supplement products (containing ephedra and ma huang extracts)
have been seized. At this time, the frequency with which these dietary
supplement products and extracts are encountered is small. From 1998
through 2005, DEA has documented 20 methamphetamine laboratories where
ephedra materials have been seized. The source of precursor chemicals
in a seized clandestine laboratory is often not evident, so it is
likely that the number of seized laboratories that used such mixtures
is actually greater. Ephedra, therefore, can and is being diverted for
use as a precursor material for the illicit production of
methamphetamine. Were DEA not to regulate chemical mixtures containing
ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine at or below the current five percent
concentration limit, DEA is concerned that these products would be more
widely diverted for illicit production of methamphetamine, particularly
as traffickers look for easily-obtainable product due to the new retail
sales, quota and import restrictions imposed by CMEA.
DEA Concerns Regarding Recent Importations
Recently DEA has seen an increasing number of requests for
importation of large shipments of ephedra material in concentrations
below the five percent ephedrine and pseudoephedrine exemption limit.
Traditionally, such ephedra extract material has always been between 6-
8 percent ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine.
As noted above, DEA has seen chemical mixtures with concentration
limits of ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine at or below five percent in
clandestine methamphetamine laboratories. Subsequent to implementing
regulations which allowed an exemption for below five percent material,
DEA has witnessed increased ability of clandestine laboratory operators
to extract ephedrine and pseudoephedrine from various bulk materials
(including low concentration mixtures). These extraction procedures are
shared via the Internet. While these mixtures may contain low
concentrations of ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine, they can be a ready
source of supply for methamphetamine traffickers.
Therefore, due to the existing clandestine methamphetamine
laboratory problem and the illicit use of extracts and dietary
supplements (containing ephedrine and related List I chemicals) as
precursor material for the clandestine production of methamphetamine,
and the new limitations imposed by the CMEA, DEA is removing the
exemption for chemical mixtures having a total concentration of less
than (or equal to) five percent ephedrine or pseudoephedrine and is
removing the exemption for unaltered ephedra plant material.
Action Taken in This Interim Rule
This Interim Rule announces the removal of the exemption for
chemical mixtures having a total concentration of ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine of five percent (or less). By removing these
exemptions, all chemical mixtures containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine will be regulated chemical mixtures subject to control
under the Controlled Substances Act, including registration,
recordkeeping, reporting, and security controls. This action will be
effective August 24, 2007.
[[Page 40742]]
This rulemaking also removes the exemption for the category of
products consisting of harvested plant material which is specified in
21 CFR 1310.12(d)(1). Harvested plant material (i.e., ephedra) that
contains ephedrine, N-methylephedrine, N-methylpseudoephedrine,
norpseudoephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, and/or pseudoephedrine,
meeting the definition of chemical mixture, shall no longer be exempt
from CSA provisions, even when the plant material is unaltered from its
natural state.
II. Provisions Specifically Applying to Regulated Chemical Mixtures
Containing These List I Chemicals
Effective August 24, 2007, any chemical mixture that contains
ephedrine or pseudoephedrine will be treated as a List I chemical.
Transactions that meet or exceed the cumulative monthly threshold for
the listed chemical, set forth at 21 CFR 1310.04, shall be regulated
transactions. Persons interested in handling a regulated mixture must
comply with the following:
Registration. Any person who manufactures, distributes, imports or
exports a regulated mixture, or proposes to engage in such activities,
with respect to a regulated mixture containing a List I chemical, shall
obtain a registration pursuant to the CSA (21 U.S.C. 822). Regulations
describing registration for List I chemical handlers are set forth in
21 CFR part 1309.
Separate registration is required for manufacture, distribution,
importing, and exporting. A separate registration is required for each
principal place of business at one general physical location where List
I chemicals are manufactured, distributed, imported, or exported by a
person (21 CFR 1309.23). Effective August 24, 2007, any person
manufacturing, distributing, importing, or exporting any amount of a
regulated mixture will become subject to the registration requirement
under the CSA. DEA recognizes, however, that it is not possible for
persons who are subject to the registration requirement to immediately
complete and submit an application for registration and for DEA to
immediately issue registrations for those activities. Therefore, in
order to allow continued legitimate commerce in regulated mixtures, DEA
is establishing in 21 CFR 1310.09 a temporary exemption from the
registration requirement for persons desiring to engage in activities
with regulated mixtures, provided that DEA receives a properly
completed application for registration on or before August 24, 2007.
The temporary exemption for such persons will remain in effect until
DEA takes final action on their application for registration.
The temporary exemption applies solely to the registration
requirement; all other chemical control requirements, including
recordkeeping and reporting, are effective on August 24, 2007.
Therefore, all transactions of chemical mixtures containing ephedrine
or pseudoephedrine will be regulated, if at or above threshold, while
an application for registration or exemption is pending. This is
necessary because not regulating these transactions could result in
increased diversion of chemicals desirable to drug traffickers.
Additionally, the temporary exemption does not suspend applicable
federal criminal laws relating to the regulated mixture, nor does it
supersede state or local laws or regulations. All handlers of a
regulated mixture must comply with applicable state and local
requirements in addition to the CSA regulatory controls.
Records and Reports. The CSA (21 U.S.C. 830) requires certain
records to be kept and reports to be made involving listed chemicals.
Regulations describing recordkeeping and reporting requirements are set
forth in 21 CFR Part 1310. A record must be made and maintained for two
years after the date of a regulated transaction involving a List I
chemical. Only a distribution, receipt, sale, importation, exportation,
brokerage or trade of a regulated mixture above the established
threshold is a regulated transaction (21 CFR 1300.02(b)(28)).
Each regulated bulk manufacturer of a regulated mixture shall
submit manufacturing, inventory, and use data on an annual basis (21
CFR 1310.05(d)). Bulk manufacturers producing the mixture solely for
internal consumption, e.g. formulating a nonregulated mixture, are not
required to submit this information. Existing standard industry reports
containing the required information are acceptable, provided the
information is readily retrievable from the report.
21 CFR 1310.05 requires that each regulated person shall report to
DEA any regulated transaction involving an extraordinary quantity, an
uncommon method of payment or delivery, or any other circumstance that
causes the regulated person to believe that the listed chemical will be
used in violation of the CSA. Section 1310.03(c) requires that
regulated persons who engage in a transaction with a nonregulated
person or who engage in an export transaction that involves ephedrine
or pseudoephedrine, including drug products containing these chemicals,
and uses or attempts to use the Postal Service or any private or
commercial carrier must file monthly reports of each such transaction.
Imports/Exports. All imports/exports and brokered transactions of
regulated mixtures containing ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine shall
comply with the CSA (21 U.S.C. 952, 957 and 971). Regulations for
importation and exportation of List I chemicals are described in 21 CFR
part 1313. Separate registration is necessary for each activity (21 CFR
1309.22).
Security. Regulated persons must provide effective controls and
procedures to guard against theft and diversion of regulated mixtures.
Regulated persons must store the regulated mixtures in containers
sealed so that tampering will be evident; if the mixture cannot be
stored in a sealed container, access to the chemicals must be
controlled (21 CFR 1309.71).
Administrative Inspection. Places, including factories, warehouses,
or other establishments and conveyances, where regulated persons may
lawfully hold, manufacture, or distribute, dispense, administer, or
otherwise dispose of a regulated mixture or where records relating to
those activities are maintained, are controlled premises as defined in
21 CFR 1316.02(c). The CSA (21 U.S.C. 880) allows for administrative
inspections of these controlled premises as provided in 21 CFR Part
1316 Subpart A.
Regulatory Certifications
Administrative Procedure Act
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally requires that
agencies, prior to issuing a new rule, publish a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register. The APA also provides, however,
that agencies may be excepted from this requirement when ``the agency
for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and
public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
With publication of this interim rule, DEA is invoking this ``good
cause'' exception to the APA's notice requirement based on the
combination of several extraordinary factors. Section 713 of the CMEA
(21 U.S.C. 826 as amended) requires the establishment of production
quotas for the List I chemicals ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and
phenylpropanolamine. DEA implemented these requirements in a separate
rulemaking, ``Import and
[[Page 40743]]
Production Quotas for Certain List I Chemicals'' [Docket No. DEA-293,
RIN 1117-AB08] (72 FR 37439, July 10, 2007). DEA cannot establish such
quotas if certain products containing these List I chemicals are not
regulated. To not regulate these products while at the same time
establishing production quotas would create a loophole which
traffickers could exploit domestically. CMEA also mandates that imports
of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine are prohibited
except for such quantities as the Attorney General (DEA by delegation)
finds necessary to provide for medical, scientific, or other legitimate
purposes (CMEA section 715, 21 U.S.C. 952 as amended). DEA is further
required to establish import quotas for these three List I chemicals.
In order for DEA to establish quotas and meet its obligation to
prohibit imports except those necessary to provide for a medical,
scientific, or other legitimate purpose, as required by the CMEA, DEA
must exercise regulatory control over chemical mixtures containing
pseudoephedrine and ephedrine. To exercise this control, DEA must
eliminate the exemption for chemical mixtures containing these List I
chemicals.
DEA is concerned about the increasing number of requests for
importation of below-five percent ephedrine or pseudoephedrine
material. After the recent FDA action which bans dietary supplements
containing such material, DEA has not been able to determine the
legitimate need for importation of such material. Therefore, in an
effort to eliminate the undocumented importation and domestic
distribution of such material, and to comply with all of the new
requirements imposed by the CMEA discussed above, DEA is removing these
exemptions.
As has been discussed previously in this rulemaking, DEA has seized
chemical mixtures containing ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine with
concentrations of less than five percent at 20 domestic clandestine
laboratories over the past several years. The source of precursor
chemicals in a seized clandestine laboratory is often not evident, so
it is likely that the number of seized laboratories that used such
mixtures is actually greater. Further, the CMEA specifically prohibits
all importation of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine
except those quantities which the Attorney General finds to be
necessary for medical, scientific, and other legitimate purposes. These
seizures, coupled with the new requirements limiting importation of
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine, as well as the
establishment of production and import quotas for these three List I
chemicals, necessitate that DEA remove the concentration limit for
these previously exempt chemical mixtures. Engaging in traditional
notice and comment rulemaking would prevent DEA from complying with the
mandates of CMEA to limit the importation and domestic production of
these materials.
Were DEA not to regulate chemical mixtures containing ephedrine
and/or pseudoephedrine at or below the current five percent
concentration limit, DEA is concerned that these products would be more
widely diverted for illicit production of methamphetamine, particularly
with the new quota and import restrictions imposed by CMEA.
Accordingly, DEA finds that it is impracticable to conduct notice and
comment rulemaking regarding the removal of the exemption for chemical
mixtures with concentration limits at or below the current five percent
limit. If DEA did not act in this manner, traffickers would have ready
access to chemical mixtures which DEA has demonstrated are being used
currently to illicitly manufacture methamphetamine. Allowing such
illicit manufacture to continue during the pendancy of rulemaking would
be contrary to the public interest and the intent of the Combat
Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005. The broad scope of the new law,
as well as the expedited effective dates, is a clear reflection of
Congress' concern about the nation's growing methamphetamine epidemic
and its desire to act quickly to prevent further illicit use of these
chemicals.
In light of these factors, DEA finds that ``good cause'' exists to
issue this interim rule without engaging in traditional notice and
comment rulemaking. In so doing, DEA recognizes that exceptions to the
APA's notice and comment procedures are to be ``narrowly construed and
only reluctantly countenanced.'' Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Block,
655 F2d 1153, 1156 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (quoting New Jersey Dep't of Envt.
Prot. v. EPA, 626 F.2d 1038, 1045 (D.C. Cir. 1980)). Based on the
totality of the circumstances associated with the CMEA, DEA finds that
invocation of the ``good cause'' exception is justified.
Further, the APA also provides that, while agencies are generally
required to publish final rules at least 30 days before they become
effective, they may be exempt from this requirement as well ``for good
cause found and published with the rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). As
discussed previously, DEA has recently seen a significant increase in
the number of requests for importation of large quantities of these
chemical mixtures. After the recent FDA action which bans dietary
supplements containing such material, DEA has not been able to
determine the legitimate need for importation of such material. DEA is
concerned about the potential illicit use of such material for
clandestine methamphetamine manufacture, particularly as traffickers
look for easily-obtainable product due to the retail sales limits
recently imposed by the CMEA. Delaying the effective date of this rule
could provide a significant loophole for domestic illicit
methamphetamine manufacturers to take advantage of for their illegal
activities. Therefore, DEA finds good cause not to delay the effective
date of this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator hereby certifies that this rulemaking has
been drafted in accordance with the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 605(b)). The (RFA) applies to rules
that are subject to notice and comment. As explained above, DEA has
determined that public notice and comment are not necessary.
Consequently, the RFA does not apply. DEA notes, however, that as
explained in the discussion under Executive Order 12866, the costs of
this rule are low, requiring only registration, maintenance of records,
reports on unusual transactions, thefts or losses, and mail order
transactions, and security. Other than the registration fee and the
reports, these requirements can generally be met by standard business
practices.
DEA has determined that dietary supplements containing ephedrine
alkaloids, including bulk material used to formulate these supplements,
are the principal chemical mixtures that contain ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine. Dietary supplements containing such ephedrine
alkaloids have been banned by FDA. Due to (1) The CMEA mandate that DEA
limit the domestic production and importation of materials containing
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine to quantities necessary for medical,
scientific and other legitimate purposes; (2) the elimination of the
previous lawful status of such products as dietary supplements; and (3)
the potential illicit use of such products as precursor material for
illicit production of methamphetamine, DEA is removing the exemption
for low concentration material, including harvested plant
[[Page 40744]]
material. This industry is comprised mainly of small businesses, as
defined by U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) regulations (13 CFR
part 121). However, the lawful marketing of dietary supplements
containing ephedrine alkaloids has been banned by FDA. As such, this
regulatory action is not expected to impact any manufacturers whose
product can still lawfully be marketed under the FFD&CA. Persons who
import or distribute chemical mixtures containing ephedrine and/or
pseudoephedrine at or below the previously-exempt five percent
concentration limit will be affected by this rule. This rule will not
have a significant economic impact on those persons. However, DEA is
seeking comment specifically regarding the potential impacts of this
regulation.
DEA is not prohibiting the importation, exportation, manufacture,
or distribution of chemical mixtures containing ephedrine or
pseudoephedrine in concentrations less than or equal to five percent.
Rather, DEA is regulating the importation, exportation, manufacture,
and distribution of these chemical mixtures by requiring persons who
handle these chemical mixtures to register with DEA, maintain certain
records common to business practice, and file certain reports,
regarding these chemical mixtures. Chemical mixtures containing the
List I chemicals ephedrine and pseudoephedrine will still be available
for use.
Executive Order 12866
This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, section 1(b), Principles of Regulation. DEA has
determined that this rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review,
and accordingly this rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
The rule will impose relatively low costs on regulated persons.
Other than the annual registration fee of $1,247, there are few costs
associated with the rule. The records required on regulated
transactions can be met with standard business records. Reports on
unusual sales, thefts, and losses will be filed infrequently by any one
person. Those who sell covered mixtures and deliver them to the end
user through the mail or other delivery services will have to file a
monthly report. The monthly report requires only the registrant's name
and registration number, the purchaser's name and address, the shipping
address (if different), the name and quantity of the chemical, and the
date of shipment; all of this information is available from standard
business and shipping records. These reports may be filed
electronically. The security requirements do not exceed standard
business practices for the protection of both the security and quality
of these products. DEA has not determined the number of firms
potentially affected by the rule, but does not expect it to be high.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or modify any provision of state
law; nor does it impose enforcement responsibilities on any state; nor
does it diminish the power of any state to enforce its own laws.
Accordingly, this rulemaking does not have federalism implications
warranting the application of Executive Order 13132.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$120,000,000 or more (adjusted for inflation) in any one year, and will
not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Drug Enforcement Administration is eliminating the current
exemption for chemical mixtures with concentration limits of the List I
chemicals ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine of less than or equal to
five percent. This means that all chemical mixtures containing the List
I chemicals ephedrine and/or pseudoephedrine are regulated chemical
mixtures, regardless of concentration limits.
Due to this change in the regulations, all persons who import,
export, manufacture, or distribute chemical mixtures containing these
two List I chemicals will be required to register with DEA. They will
also be required to file reports regarding certain transactions, should
certain criteria be met.
DEA does, however, provide a mechanism whereby a person may seek an
exemption from these regulatory requirements for a specific chemical
mixture, if DEA determines that such a chemical mixture cannot be used
by traffickers to manufacture controlled substances illicitly.
DEA notes that the lawful marketing of dietary supplements
containing this material has been banned by FDA. As such, this
regulatory action is expected to impact no manufacturers, whose product
can still lawfully be marketed under the FFD&CA.
Therefore, as the impact of this regulation is minimal, DEA is
making minor adjustments to the OMB information collections entitled
``Application for Registration Under Domestic Chemical Diversion
Control Act of 1993 and Renewal Application for Registration under
Domestic Chemical Diversion Control Act of 1993'' (OMB control number
1117-0031, DEA Form 510), ``Report of Mail Order Transactions'' (OMB
control number 1117-0033), and ``Import/Export Declaration for List I
and List II Chemicals'' (OMB control number 1117-0023). DEA is
specifically seeking comment regarding the number of persons who may be
affected by this regulation.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as defined by Section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(Congressional Review Act). This rule will not result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of
United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1310
Drug traffic control, Exports, Imports, List I and List II
chemicals, Reporting and Recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set out above, 21 CFR part 1310 is amended as follows:
PART 1310--RECORDS AND REPORTS OF LISTED CHEMICALS AND CERTAIN
MACHINES [AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 1310 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802, 827(h), 830, 871(b), 890.
0
2. Section 1310.09 is amended by adding a new paragraph (j) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1310.09 Temporary exemption from registration.
* * * * *
(j) Each person required by section 302 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 822)
to obtain
[[Page 40745]]
a registration to manufacture, distribute, import, or export regulated
chemical mixtures which contain ephedrine, and/or pseudoephedrine,
pursuant to Sections 1310.12 and 1310.13, is temporarily exempted from
the registration requirement, provided that DEA receives a properly
completed application for registration or application for exemption on
or before August 24, 2007. The exemption will remain in effect for each
person who has made such application until the Administration has
approved or denied that application. This exemption applies only to
registration; all other chemical control requirements set forth in
parts 1309, 1310, 1313, and 1315 of this chapter remain in full force
and effect. Any person who manufactures, distributes, imports, or
exports a chemical mixture whose application for exemption is
subsequently denied by DEA must obtain a registration with DEA. A
temporary exemption from the registration requirement will also be
provided for these persons, provided that DEA receives a properly
completed application for registration on or before 30 days following
the date of official DEA notification that the application for
exemption has not been approved. The temporary exemption for such
persons will remain in effect until DEA takes final action on their
registration application.
0
3. Section 1310.12 is amended as follows:
0
A. By revising the Table of Concentration Limits in paragraph (c) by
revising the entries for ``Ephedrine, its salts, optical isomers, and
salts of optical isomers'' and ``Pseudoephedrine, its salts, optical
isomers, and salts of optical isomers''; and
0
B. By removing paragraph (d)(1) and redesignating paragraphs (d)(2)
through (d)(5) as paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(4) as follows:
Sec. 1310.12 Exempt chemical mixtures.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table of Concentration Limits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEA chemical
code number Concentration (percent) Special conditions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List I Chemicals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Ephedrine, its salts, optical isomers, 8113 Not exempt at any Chemical mixtures containing
and salts of optical isomers. concentration. any amount of ephedrine and/
or pseudoephedrine, and
their salts, optical isomers
and salts of optical isomers
are not exempt due to
concentration, unless
otherwise exempted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Pseudoephedrine, its salts, optical 8112 Not exempt at any Chemical mixtures containing
isomers, and salts of optical isomers. concentration. any amount of ephedrine and/
or pseudoephedrine, and
their salts, optical isomers
and salts of optical isomers
are not exempt due to
concentration, unless
otherwise exempted.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List II Chemicals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Dated: July 2, 2007.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-14295 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P