South Project; Hell Canyon Ranger District, Black Hills National Forest Custer, SD, 40831-40832 [07-3621]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date that the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
Written comments are preferred and
should include the name and address of
the commenter. Comments submitted
for this proposed action will be
considered part of the public record.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process.
Reviewers of draft environmental
impact statements must structure their
participation in the review of the
proposal so that it is meaningful and
alerts an agency to the reviewer’s
position and contentions. Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC,
435 U.S. 519, 533 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage, but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement, may
be waived or dismissed by the courts.
City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages Inc. v. Harris, 409 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at the
time when it can meaningfully consider
them and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternative formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Dated: July 18, 2007.
Nancy J. Rusho,
Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07–3616 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:31 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
South Project; Hell Canyon Ranger
District, Black Hills National Forest
Custer, SD
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Hell Canyon Ranger
District of the Black Hills National
Forest intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for a proposal to implement multiple
resource management actions within the
South project area as directed by the
Black Hills National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan. The South
project area is approximately 52,082
acres in size, with 43,045 acres of
National Forest lands, 1,197 acres of
state land and 7,840 acres of private
land. The project proposes to reduce the
risk of large-scale wildfire effects on the
At-Risks Communities (ARC) of Custer,
Pringle and Argyle, South Dakota,
provide for wildlife habitat needs,
reduce risks of mountain pine beetle
infestation, provide a sustainable supply
of commercial timber, and provide
management and public access.
DATES: Comments related to this project
will be most useful to the planning team
if received within 30 days after
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. The draft environmental
impact statement is expected to be
available January 2008 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected to be completed by June 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Michael D. Lloyd, District Ranger, Black
Hills National Forest, Hell Canyon
Ranger District, 330 Mount Rushmore
Road, Custer, South Dakota 57730.
Telephone number: (605) 673–4853. Fax
number: (605) 673–5461. Electronic
comments must be readable in Word,
RichText or pdf format and must
contain ‘‘South’’ in the subject line.
Electronic comments may be e-mailed
to: comments-rocky-mountain-blackhills-hell-canyon@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Betsy Koncerak, Project Leader, at the
address listed above or by phone at
(605) 673–4853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
actions proposed are in direct response
to management direction provided by
the Black Hills National Forest Land
and Resource Management Plan, as
amended (Forest Plan). The Project Area
is located approximately four miles west
of Custer, South Dakota and is within
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40831
Custer County. The northernmost point
of the project area lies approximately
four miles north of US Highway 16
along Lightning Creek road. The
southernmost point of the project area is
approximately 12 miles south of US
Highway 16 along Pleasant Valley Road.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for action in
the South project area is to reduce the
risk of large-scale wildfire on the AtRisk Communities (ARCs) of Custer,
Pringle and Argyle, South Dakota (66 FR
43384), provide for wildlife habitat
needs, enhance vegetative diversity,
reduce the risk of mountain pine beetle
infestation, and provide a sustainable
supply of commercial timber consistent
with direction in the Revised Forest
Plan for the Black Hills National Forest,
as amended (Forest Plan), while
providing for management and public
access needs. This project is focused on
implementing management actions that
move toward achieving desired
conditions and objectives embodied in
Goals 10 (establish and maintain a
mosaic of vegetation conditions to
reduce occurrences of large-scale fire,
insect, and disease events), 2 (provide
for biologically diverse ecosystems), and
3 (provide for sustained commodity
uses) of the Forest Plan.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes the
following management actions:
• Commercial thinning to 40 basal
area on approximately 9,621 acres to
reduce fuels around private lands to
reduce the risk of large-scale wildfire. In
addition, approximately 9,400 acres of
prescribed burning is proposed to
reduce fuels in other portions of the
project area to create fuel breaks for
community protection.
• Commercial thinning to 60 basal
area on approximately 2,628 acres to
increase tree growth and vigor, reduce
the potential for mountain pine beetle
infestation and reduce the potential for
spreading crown fires.
• Releasing approximately 11,428
acres of regenerated pine stands through
overstory removal prescriptions.
• Restoration and maintenance of
meadows by removing conifers from
approximately 2,847 acres of these
habitats.
• Reducing the density of the
managed road system, which is
currently 5.4 miles per square mile, by
closing unneeded roads and by
converting needed, unauthorized roads
to system roads.
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
40832
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 25, 2007 / Notices
Responsible Official
Michael D. Lloyd, District Ranger,
Black Hills National Forest, Hell Canyon
Ranger District, 330 Mount Rushmore
Road, Custer, South Dakota 57730.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether or
not to implement the proposed action or
an alternative to the proposed action at
this time.
Scoping Process
The Hell Canyon Ranger District has
mailed letters with comprehensive
scoping documents to landowners, local
and tribal government representatives,
permittees, and other interested or
potentially affected parties and
organizations. The scoping document
with attached maps will be posted on
the Black Hills National Forest Web site
in July 2007. Comments submitted in
response to this NOI will be most useful
to the project planning team if received
within 30 days from the date of this
notice.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Comment Requested
This notice of intent is part of the
scoping process which will guide the
development of the EIS. Comments
received will assist the planing team
with identification of key issues to
refine the proposal, create alternative
proposals, and identify necessary
project design features. Comments on
the Draft EIS will be requested during
the 45 day comment period following
publication of the Notice of Availability
in the Federal Register which is
expected in January 2008.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A Draft EIS will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the
draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service planning team
would like to take this opportunity to
give reviewers advanced notice of
several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental
review process: (1) Reviewers of draft
environmental impact statements must
structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so
that it is meaningful and alters an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553
(1978); (2) Environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:31 Jul 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court
rulings, parties interested in this
proposed action must submit comments
by the close of the 45 day comment
period to assure that the Forest Service
planning team can meaningfully
consider and respond to them in the
final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. Please refer to specific pages
or chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed
within the statement. In addressing
these points, reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3.
Comments received on this proposal,
including names and addresses of those
who comment, will be considered part
of the public record and will be
available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: July 18, 2007.
Craig Bobzien
Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest.
[FR Doc. 07–3621 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Wednesday, August 8, 2007,
beginning at 10:30 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Idaho Counties Risk
Management Program Building, 3100
South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda
topics will include review and approval
of project proposals, and is an open
public forum.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Gochnour, Designated Federal
Officer, at 208–392–6681 or e-mail
dgochnour@fs.fed.us.
DATES:
Dated: July 17, 2007.
Richard A. Smith,
Forest Supervisor, Boise National Forest.
[FR Doc. 07–3617 Filed 7–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Sierra County, CA, Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Sierra County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet on
August 9, 2007, in Sierraville,
California. The purpose of the meeting
is to discuss issues relating to
implementing the Secure Rural Schools
and Community Self-Determination Act
of 2000 (Payments to States) as extended
by Public Law 110–28 and the
expenditure of Title II funds benefiting
National Forest System lands on the
Humboldt-Toiyabe, Plumas and Tahoe
National Forests in Sierra County.
DATES: The meeting will be held
Thursday, August 9, 2007 at 10 a.m. (If
there is a need to cancel this meeting,
a back-up is scheduled for Monday,
August 13, 2007 at the same time/
location.)
The meeting will be held at
the Downieville Community Hall,
Downieville, CA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann
Westling, Committee Coordinator,
USDA, Tahoe National Forest, 631
Coyote St., Nevada City, CA 95959,
(530) 478–6205, e-mail:
awestling@fs.fed.us.
ADDRESSES:
Forest Service
Notice of Southwest Idaho Resource
Advisory Committee Meeting
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
393), the Boise and Payette National
Forests’ Southwest Idaho Resource
Advisory Committee will conduct a
business meeting, which is open to the
public.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Agenda
items to be covered include: (1)
Welcome and announcements; (2) status
of previously approved projects; and (3)
review of and decisions on new projects
proposals for current year. The meeting
is open to the public and the public will
have an opportunity to comment at the
meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40831-40832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3621]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
South Project; Hell Canyon Ranger District, Black Hills National
Forest Custer, SD
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Hell Canyon Ranger District of the Black Hills National
Forest intends to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a
proposal to implement multiple resource management actions within the
South project area as directed by the Black Hills National Forest Land
and Resource Management Plan. The South project area is approximately
52,082 acres in size, with 43,045 acres of National Forest lands, 1,197
acres of state land and 7,840 acres of private land. The project
proposes to reduce the risk of large-scale wildfire effects on the At-
Risks Communities (ARC) of Custer, Pringle and Argyle, South Dakota,
provide for wildlife habitat needs, reduce risks of mountain pine
beetle infestation, provide a sustainable supply of commercial timber,
and provide management and public access.
DATES: Comments related to this project will be most useful to the
planning team if received within 30 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. The draft environmental impact
statement is expected to be available January 2008 and the final
environmental impact statement is expected to be completed by June
2008.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Michael D. Lloyd, District Ranger,
Black Hills National Forest, Hell Canyon Ranger District, 330 Mount
Rushmore Road, Custer, South Dakota 57730. Telephone number: (605) 673-
4853. Fax number: (605) 673-5461. Electronic comments must be readable
in Word, RichText or pdf format and must contain ``South'' in the
subject line. Electronic comments may be e-mailed to: comments-rocky-
mountain-black-hills-hell-canyon@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Betsy Koncerak, Project Leader, at the
address listed above or by phone at (605) 673-4853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The actions proposed are in direct response
to management direction provided by the Black Hills National Forest
Land and Resource Management Plan, as amended (Forest Plan). The
Project Area is located approximately four miles west of Custer, South
Dakota and is within Custer County. The northernmost point of the
project area lies approximately four miles north of US Highway 16 along
Lightning Creek road. The southernmost point of the project area is
approximately 12 miles south of US Highway 16 along Pleasant Valley
Road.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for action in the South project area is to
reduce the risk of large-scale wildfire on the At-Risk Communities
(ARCs) of Custer, Pringle and Argyle, South Dakota (66 FR 43384),
provide for wildlife habitat needs, enhance vegetative diversity,
reduce the risk of mountain pine beetle infestation, and provide a
sustainable supply of commercial timber consistent with direction in
the Revised Forest Plan for the Black Hills National Forest, as amended
(Forest Plan), while providing for management and public access needs.
This project is focused on implementing management actions that move
toward achieving desired conditions and objectives embodied in Goals 10
(establish and maintain a mosaic of vegetation conditions to reduce
occurrences of large-scale fire, insect, and disease events), 2
(provide for biologically diverse ecosystems), and 3 (provide for
sustained commodity uses) of the Forest Plan.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes the following management actions:
Commercial thinning to 40 basal area on approximately
9,621 acres to reduce fuels around private lands to reduce the risk of
large-scale wildfire. In addition, approximately 9,400 acres of
prescribed burning is proposed to reduce fuels in other portions of the
project area to create fuel breaks for community protection.
Commercial thinning to 60 basal area on approximately
2,628 acres to increase tree growth and vigor, reduce the potential for
mountain pine beetle infestation and reduce the potential for spreading
crown fires.
Releasing approximately 11,428 acres of regenerated pine
stands through overstory removal prescriptions.
Restoration and maintenance of meadows by removing
conifers from approximately 2,847 acres of these habitats.
Reducing the density of the managed road system, which is
currently 5.4 miles per square mile, by closing unneeded roads and by
converting needed, unauthorized roads to system roads.
[[Page 40832]]
Responsible Official
Michael D. Lloyd, District Ranger, Black Hills National Forest,
Hell Canyon Ranger District, 330 Mount Rushmore Road, Custer, South
Dakota 57730.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether or not to implement the proposed
action or an alternative to the proposed action at this time.
Scoping Process
The Hell Canyon Ranger District has mailed letters with
comprehensive scoping documents to landowners, local and tribal
government representatives, permittees, and other interested or
potentially affected parties and organizations. The scoping document
with attached maps will be posted on the Black Hills National Forest
Web site in July 2007. Comments submitted in response to this NOI will
be most useful to the project planning team if received within 30 days
from the date of this notice.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent is part of the scoping process which will
guide the development of the EIS. Comments received will assist the
planing team with identification of key issues to refine the proposal,
create alternative proposals, and identify necessary project design
features. Comments on the Draft EIS will be requested during the 45 day
comment period following publication of the Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register which is expected in January 2008.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A Draft EIS will be prepared for comment. The comment period on the
draft environmental impact statement will be 45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency publishes the Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service planning team would like to take this
opportunity to give reviewers advanced notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the environmental review process:
(1) Reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure
their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that
it is meaningful and alters an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978); (2) Environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
parties interested in this proposed action must submit comments by the
close of the 45 day comment period to assure that the Forest Service
planning team can meaningfully consider and respond to them in the
final environmental impact statement. To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be as
specific as possible. Please refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed within the statement. In addressing these
points, reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3.
Comments received on this proposal, including names and addresses
of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record and
will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: July 18, 2007.
Craig Bobzien
Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest.
[FR Doc. 07-3621 Filed 7-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M