Fishing Capacity Reduction Program for the Longline Catcher Processor Subsector of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Non-Pollock Groundfish Fishery, Industry Fee System, 39779-39783 [E7-14118]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
Since this regulation would not impose
any costs on State or local governments,
the requirements of E.O. 13132 are not
applicable.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this regulation
was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
List of Subjects 42 CFR in Part 455
Fraud, Grant programs—health,
Health facilities, Health professions,
Investigations, Medicaid, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services would amend 42 CFR
chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 455—PROGRAM INTEGRITY;
MEDICAID
1. The authority citation for part 455
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 1102 of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1302).
2. In § 455.1, add new paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
§ 455.1
Basis and scope.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Subpart C implements section
1936 of the Act. It establishes the
Medicaid Integrity Program under
which the Secretary will promote the
integrity of the program by entering into
contracts with eligible entities to carry
out the activities of subpart C.
3. New subpart C, consisting of
§ 455.200 and § 455.202, is added to part
455 to read as follows:
§ 455.202
Limitation on contractor liability.
(a) A program contractor, a person, or
an entity employed by, or having a
fiduciary relationship with, or who
furnishes professional services to a
program contractor will not be held to
have violated any criminal law and will
not be held liable in any civil action,
under any law of the United States or of
any State (or political subdivision
thereof), by reason of the performance of
any duty, function, or activity required
or authorized under this subpart or
under a valid contract entered into
under this subpart, provided due care
was exercised in that performance and
the contractor has a contract with CMS
under this subpart.
(b) CMS pays a contractor, a person,
or an entity described in paragraph (a)
of this section, or anyone who furnishes
legal counsel or services to a contractor
or person, a sum equal to the reasonable
amount of the expenses, as determined
by CMS, incurred in connection with
the defense of a suit, action, or
proceeding, if the following conditions
are met:
(1) The suit, action, or proceeding was
brought against the contractor, person or
entity by a third party and relates to the
contractor’s, person’s or entity’s
performance of any duty, function, or
activity under a contract entered into
with CMS under this subpart.
(2) The funds are available.
(3) The expenses are otherwise
allowable under the terms of the
contract.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
Subpart C—Medicaid Integrity Program
Dated: March 15, 2007.
Leslie V. Norwalk,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Approved: April 20, 2007.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–14115 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am]
§ 455.200
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Subpart C—Medicaid Integrity Program
Sec.
455.200 Basis and scope.
455.202 Limitation on contractor liability.
Basis and scope.
(a) Statutory basis. This subpart
implements section 1936 of the Act that
establishes the Medicaid Integrity
Program under which the Secretary will
promote the integrity of the program by
entering into contracts with eligible
entities to carry out the activities under
this subpart C.
(b) Scope. This subpart provides for
the limitation on a contractor’s liability
to carry out a contract under the
Medicaid Integrity Program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39779
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 600
[Docket No. 070607179–7312–01]
RIN 0648–AV66
Fishing Capacity Reduction Program
for the Longline Catcher Processor
Subsector of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Non-Pollock
Groundfish Fishery, Industry Fee
System
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to
implement an industry fee system for
repaying a $35 million Federal loan
financing a fishing capacity reduction
program in the longline catcher
processor subsector of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) nonpollock groundfish fishery. This action’s
intent is to implement a fee collection
system to ensure repayment of the loan.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
must be received by August 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: 0648–
AV66.FeeSystem@noaa.gov. Include in
the subject line the following identifier:
‘‘Longline catcher processor buyback fee
system proposed rule.’’ E-mail
comments, with or without attachments,
are limited to 5 megabytes;
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov;
• Mail to: Leo Erwin, Chief, Financial
Services Division, NMFS–MB5, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910; or
• Fax to 301–713–1306.
Comments involving the burden-hour
estimates or other aspects of the
collection-of-information requirements
contained in this proposed rule should
be submitted in writing to Leo Erwin, at
the above address, and to David Rostker,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), by email at
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax to
202 395 7285.
Copies of the Environmental
Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(EA/RIR/FRFA) prepared for the
program may be obtained from Leo
Erwin at the above address.
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
39780
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leo
Erwin at 301–713 2390.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 312(b)-(e) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a(b)
through (e)) generally authorized fishing
capacity reduction programs. In
particular, section 312(d) authorized
industry fee systems for repaying the
reduction loans which finance
reduction program costs. Subpart L of
50 CFR part 600 is the framework rule
generally implementing sections 312(b)–
(e). Subpart M of 50 CFR part 600
contains specific fishery or program
regulations.
Sections 1111 and 1112 of the
Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 App.
U.S.C. 1279f and 1279g) generally
authorized reduction loans.
The FY 2005 Appropriations Act
(Public Law 108–447, Section 219)
authorized a fishing capacity reduction
program for the longline catcher
processor subsector of the BSAI nonpollock groundfish fishery (reduction
fishery).
NMFS published the longline catcher
processor subsector BSAI non-pollock
reduction program’s (reduction
program) proposed implementation rule
on August 11, 2006 (71 FR 46364) and
its final rule on September 29, 2006 (71
FR 57696). Anyone interested in the
reduction program’s full
implementation details should refer to
these two documents. NMFS proposed
and adopted the reduction program’s
implementation rule as § 600.1105 of
subpart M of 50 CFR part 600.
The reduction program’s objectives
include promoting sustainable fishery
management and maximum sustained
reduction of fishing capacity from the
reduction fishery at the least cost. This
is a voluntary program in which, in
return for reduction payments, selected
offerors permanently relinquished their
fishing licenses, surrendered the fishing
histories upon which those licenses’
issuance were based, and permanently
withdrew vessels from fishing.
NMFS financed the reduction
program’s $35 million cost, which postreduction BSAI non-pollock groundfish
longline catcher processors repay over
an anticipated 30-year term but fees will
continue indefinitely for as long as
necessary to fully repay the loan.
The fee amount, expressed in cents
per pound rounded up to the next onetenth of a cent, will be based upon the
annual principal and interest due on the
loan and could be up to 5 percent of
longline catcher processor subsector
BSAI Pacific cod landings. In the event
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
that the total principal and interest due
exceeds 5 percent of the ex-vessel
Pacific cod revenues, an additional fee
of one penny per pound will be assessed
for pollock, arrowtooth flounder,
Greenland turbot, skate, yellowfin sole
and rock sole.
The Freezer Longline Conservation
Cooperative (FLCC) received member
offers and subsequently voted to accept
four offers. The FLCC submitted a
fishing capacity reduction plan
(reduction plan) subsequently approved
by NMFS. A referendum concerning the
fees necessary for repayment of the $35
million loan followed the offer and
acceptance process. Approval of the
industry fee system required at least
two-thirds of the votes cast in the
referendum to be in favor before the
reduction program could be
implemented and payment tendered.
NMFS mailed ballots to 39 qualified
referendum voters on March 21, 2007,
after approving the reduction plan. The
voting period opened on March 21,
2007, and closed on April 6, 2007.
NMFS received 34 timely and valid
votes. All of the votes approved the fees.
This exceeded the two-thirds minimum
required for industry fee system
approval. Consequently, this
referendum was successful and
approved the industry fee system.
On April 26, 2007, NMFS published
a Federal Register notice (72 FR 20836)
advising the public that NMFS would,
beginning on May 29, 2007, tender the
reduction program’s reduction
payments to the four selected offerors.
On May 29, 2007, NMFS required the
selected offerors to permanently stop all
fishing with the reduction vessels and
permits. Subsequently, NMFS:
1. Disbursed $35,000,000 in reduction
payments to the four selected offerors;
2. Revoked the relinquished reduction
licenses;
3. Revoked each reduction vessel’s
fishing history;
4. Notified the National Vessel
Documentation Center to revoke the
reduction vessels’ fishery trade
endorsements and appropriately
annotate the reduction vessel’s
document; and
5. Notified the U.S. Maritime
Administration to prohibit the reduction
vessel’s transfer to foreign ownership or
registry.
Selected offerors participating in the
reduction program have received $35
million in exchange for relinquishing
valid non-interim Federal License
Limitation Program BSAI groundfish
licenses endorsed for catcher processor
fishing activity, catcher/processor,
Pacific cod, and hook and line gear, as
well as any present or future claims of
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
eligibility for any fishing privilege based
on such permit, and additionally, any
future fishing privilege of the vessel
named on the permit. Individual fishing
quota shares are excluded from
relinquishment.
II. Proposed Regulations
NMFS has completed the reduction
program except for implementing the
industry fee system which this action
proposes to implement. The fee amount
will be calculated on an annual basis as:
the principal and interest payment
amount due over the proceeding twelve
months, divided by the reduction
fishery portion of the BSAI Pacific cod
initial total allowable catch (ITAC)
allocation in metric tons multiplied by
2,205 to convert into pounds, provided
that the fees should not exceed 5
percent of the average ex-vessel
production value of the reduction
fishery.
The terms defined in § 600.1105 of the
reduction program’s implementation
rule and in § 600.1000 of the framework
rule apply to this action.
The framework rule’s § 600.1013
governs fee payment and collection in
general, and this action applies the
§ 600.1013 provisions to the reduction
program.
Under § 600.1013, the first ex-vessel
buyers (fish buyers) of post-reduction
fish (fee fish) subject to an industry fee
system must withhold the fee from the
trip proceeds which the fish buyers
would otherwise have paid to the
parties (fish sellers) who harvested and
first sold the fee fish to the fish buyers.
For the purpose of the fee collection,
deposit, disbursement, and accounting
requirements of this subpart, subsector
members are deemed to be both the fish
buyer and fish seller. In this case, all
requirements and penalties of
§ 600.1013 of this subpart that are
applicable to both a fish seller and a fish
buyer shall equally apply to parties
performing both functions.
The BSAI Pacific cod ITAC was
chosen as the basis for fee calculation of
the reduction program because Pacific
cod is the only directed fishery with a
total allowable catch set in advance of
the fishing season. This methodology
allows for a straightforward calculation
of the fee due and simplifies future
accounting. The fee will be assessed and
collected on Pacific cod to the extent
possible and if the amount is not
sufficient to cover annual principal and
interest due, additional fees will be
assessed and collected. Fees will be
assessed and collected on all harvested
Pacific cod, including that used for bait
or discarded. Although the fee could be
up to 5 percent of the ex-vessel
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
production value of all post-reduction
longline catcher processor subsector
non-pollock groundfish landings, the fee
will be less than 5 percent if NMFS
projects that a lesser rate can amortize
the fishery’s reduction loan over the
reduction loan’s 30-year term.
If the total principal and interest due
exceeds five percent of the ex-vessel
Pacific cod revenues, a penny per
pound round weight fee will be
calculated based on the latest available
revenue records and NMFS conversion
factors for pollock, arrowtooth flounder,
Greenland turbot, skate, yellowfin sole
and rock sole. Any additional fees will
be limited to the amount necessary to
amortize the remaining twelve months
principal and interest in addition to the
five percent fee assessed against Pacific
cod. If collections exceed the total
principal and interest needed to
amortize the payment due, the principal
balance of the loan will be reduced.
To verify that the fees collected do not
exceed five percent of the reduction
fishery revenues, the annual total of
principal and interest due will be
compared with the latest available
annual reduction fishery revenues to
ensure it is equal to or less than five
percent of the total ex-vessel production
revenues. In all likelihood this will be
based on State of Alaska’s Commercial
Operator Annual Report produced
annually in the March following the
close of the previous season. If any of
the components necessary to calculate
the next year’s fee are not available, or
for any other reason NMFS believes the
calculation must be postponed, the fee
will remain at the previous year’s
amount until such time that new
calculations are made and
communicated to the post reduction
fishery participants.
The framework rule’s § 600.1014
governs how fish buyers must deposit,
and later disburse to NMFS, the fees
which they have collected as well as
how they must keep records of, and
report about, collected fees. Under the
framework rule’s § 600.1014, fish buyers
must, no less frequently than at the end
of each business week, deposit collected
fees through a date not more than two
calendar days before the date of deposit
in segregated and federally insured
accounts. Fees shall be submitted to
NMFS monthly and shall be due no
later than fifteen (15) calendar days
following the end of each calendar
month. Fee collection reports must
accompany these disbursements. Fish
buyers must maintain specified fee
collection records for at least 3 years
and submit to NMFS annual reports of
fee collection and disbursement
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
activities by February 1 of each calendar
year.
Under § 600.1015, the late charge to
fish buyers for fee payment, collection,
deposit, and/or disbursement shall be
one and one-half (1.5) percent per
month. The full late charge shall apply
to the fee for each month or portion of
a month that the fee remains unpaid.
To provide more accessible services,
streamline collections, and save
taxpayer dollars, fish buyers may
disburse collected fee deposits to NMFS
by using a secure Federal system on the
Internet known as Pay.gov. Pay.gov
enables subsector members to use their
checking accounts to electronically
disburse their collected fee deposits to
NMFS. Subsector members who have
access to the Internet should consider
using this quick and easy collected fee
disbursement method. Subsector
members may access Pay.gov by going
directly to Pay.gov’s Federal website at:
https://www.pay.gov/paygov/.
Subsector members who do not have
access to the Internet or who simply do
not wish to use the Pay.gov electronic
system, must disburse collected fee
deposits to NMFS by sending a check to
our lockbox at:
NOAA Fisheries Longline Catcher
Processor Non-pollock Buyback
P O Box 979060
St. Louis, MO 63197–9000
Subsector members must not forget to
include with their disbursements the fee
collection report applicable to each
disbursement. Subsector members using
Pay.gov will find an electronic fee
collection report form to accompany
electronic disbursements. Subsector
members who do not use Pay.gov must
include a hard copy fee collection report
with each of their disbursements.
Subsector members not using Pay.gov
may also access the NMFS website for
a PDF version of the fee collection
report at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
mb/financial_services/buyback.htm.
NMFS will, before the fee’s effective
date, separately mail a copy of this rule,
along with detailed fee payment,
collection, deposit, disbursement,
recording, and reporting information
and guidance, to each fish seller and
fish buyer of whom NMFS has notice.
The fact that any fish seller or fish buyer
might not, however, receive from NMFS
a copy of the notice or of the
information and guidance does not
relieve the fish seller or fish buyer from
his fee obligations under the applicable
regulations.
All parties interested in this action
should carefully read the following
framework rule sections, whose detailed
provisions apply to the fee system for
repaying the reduction program’s loan:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39781
1. § 600.1012;
2. § 600.1013;
3. § 600.1014;
4. § 600.1015;
5. § 600.1016; and
6. § 600.1017.
NMFS, in accordance with the
framework rule’s § 600.1013(d),
establishes the initial fee for the
program’s reduction fishery as 2.0 cents
per pound. NMFS will then separately
mail notification to each affected fish
seller and fish buyer of whom NMFS
has notice. Until this notification, fish
sellers and fish buyers do not have to
either pay or collect the fee.
Please see the framework rule’s
§ 600.1000 for the definition of
’’delivery value’’ and of the other terms
relevant to this proposed rule. Each
disbursement of the reduction loan’s
$35,000,000 principal amount began
accruing interest as of the date of each
such disbursement. The loan’s interest
rate is the applicable rate, plus 2
percent, which the U.S. Treasury
determines at the end of fiscal year
2007.
III. Classification
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NMFS, determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2005, and other applicable laws.
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act, NMFS
prepared an EA for the reduction
program’s final implementing rule
(September 29, 2006; 71 FR 57696). The
EA discusses the impact of this
proposed rule on the natural and human
environment and integrates an RIR and
a FRFA. The EA resulted in a finding of
no significant impact. The EA
considered, among other alternatives,
the implementation of the fee payment
and collection in this action. NMFS will
send the EA, RIR, and FRFA to anyone
who requests a copy (see ADDRESSES).
NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), as required
by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), to describe the
economic impacts this proposed rule
would have on small entities. This
proposed rule does not duplicate or
conflict with other Federal regulations.
IRFA Analysis
The Small Business Administration
has defined small entities as all fish
harvesting businesses that are
independently owned and operated, not
dominant in its field of operation, and
with annual receipts of $4 million or
less. In addition, processors with 500 or
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
39782
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
fewer employees for related industries
involved in canned or cured fish and
seafood, or preparing fresh fish and
seafood, are also considered small
entities. Small entities within the scope
of this proposed rule include individual
U.S. vessels and dealers. There are no
disproportionate impacts between large
and small entities.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Description of the Number of Small
Entities
The IRFA uses the most recent year of
data available to conduct the analysis
(2003). Most firms operating in the
reduction fishery have annual gross
revenues of less than $4 million. The
IRFA analysis estimates that 24 of the
remaining 36 active longline catcher
processor vessels (i.e., 36 vessels
constitute the post-reduction longline
subsector) that participated in 2003 are
considered small entities. The
remaining 10 vessels are not considered
small entities for purposes of the RFA.
There is 1 additional fisherman with a
permit but no vessel remaining in the
longline subsector. The vessels that
might be considered large entities were
either affiliated under owners of
multiple vessels or were catcher
processors. However, little is known
about the ownership structure of the
vessels in the fleet, so it is possible that
the IRFA overestimates the number of
small entities. Because the final
reduction program rule has not resulted
in changes to allocation percentages and
participation is voluntary, net effects are
expected to be minimal relative to the
status quo.
The economic impact to communities
where non-pollock groundfish are
landed and processed would be
minimal because the harvest quotas and
allocations would not be altered. Fewer
vessels in the catcher processor fleet
may mean that fewer on-shore fleet
support services would be required in
Seattle and in Dutch Harbor. The
communities would see little change
because total landings of non-pollock
groundfish would remain at current
levels. Some beneficial impacts may
occur because this program has
provided $35 million to successful
offerors. Much of this could be
reinvested in the various communities
which serve as home ports to the vessels
and a portion would be recovered
through income taxes. Crew
employment opportunities will be
reduced when vessels were removed
from the fishery. However, those vessels
remaining in the fishery will likely
experience increased fishing
opportunities and higher per capita
incomes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
The proposed rule’s impact will be
positive for both those whose offers
NMFS has accepted, the selected
offerors who received payments to stop
fishing, and for post-reduction catcher
processors whose landing fees repay the
reduction loan. The owners whose
offers NMFS accepted have relinquished
their fishing licenses, reduction
privilege vessels where appropriate, and
fishing histories in exchange for
payment. These payments ranged from
$1.5 million for an inactive license that
was not attached to a vessel, up to $11.8
million for the removal of both an active
license and vessel from the fishery.
Those participants remaining in the
fishery after the reduction program will
incur additional fees of up to 5 percent
of the ex-vessel production value of
post-reduction landings. However, the
additional costs could be mitigated by
increased harvest opportunities by postreduction fishermen. This is because
removal of the vessels from the fishery
creates immediate benefits to the
longline catcher processor subsector by
reducing competition pressure for each
of the remaining vessels to catch fish. In
theory, each of the vessels retaining
their fishing licenses will be able to
harvest more fish. This will likely result
in net benefits to the subsector members
who have voluntarily assumed the
additional fees necessary to repay the
reduction loan.
For example, even though each vessel
could, on average, pay approximately
$77,440 in fees, the net increase per
vessel, on average could be
approximately $302,560 more than they
would have been able to make before
the reduction program’s implementation
due to the increased opportunity to
harvest the TAC. The referendum voters
also cast votes unanimously in favor of
the fee collection system, which
demonstrated to NMFS the involved
members of the fishing community have
high confidence in the cost-effectiveness
of this buyback program.
This rule, when implemented, would
affect neither authorized BSAI Pacific
cod ITAC and other non-pollock
groundfish harvest levels or harvesting
practices.
NMFS rejected the no action
alternative considered in the EA for the
final rule implementing the reduction
program because NMFS would not be in
compliance with the mandate of Section
219 of the Act to establish a reduction
program. In addition, the longline
catcher processor subsector of the nonpollock groundfish fishery would
remain overcapitalized. Although too
many vessels compete to catch the
current subsector ITAC allocation,
fishermen remain in the fishery because
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
they have no other means to recover
their significant capital investment.
Overcapitalization reduces the potential
net value that could be derived from the
non-pollock groundfish resource, by
dissipating rents, driving variable
operating costs up, and imposing
economic externalities. At the same
time, excess capacity and effort
diminish the effectiveness of current
management measures (e.g. landing
limits and seasons, bycatch reduction
measures). Overcapitalization has
diminished the economic viability of
members of the fleet and increased the
economic and social burden on fishery
dependent communities.
It has been determined that this
proposed rule is not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
OMB has approved these information
collections under OMB control number
0648 AU42. NMFS estimates that the
public reporting burden for these
requirements will average two hours for
submitting a monthly fee collection
report and four hours for submitting an
annual fish buyer report.
These response estimates include the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the information collection. Send
comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to both NMFS and
OMB (see ADDRESSES).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person is subject to
a penalty for failure to comply with, any
information collection subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
information collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 600
Fisheries, Fishing capacity reduction,
Fishing permits, Fishing vessels,
Intergovernmental relations, Loan
programs business, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 17, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons in the preamble, the
National Marine Fisheries Service
proposes to amend 50 CFR part 600 as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Proposed Rules
PART 600 MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT
PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 600
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.
2. Section 600.1106 is added to read
as follows:
§ 600.1106 Longline catcher processor
subsector Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
(BSAI) non-pollock groundfish species fee
payment and collection system.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
(a) Purpose. As authorized by Public
Law 108 447, this section’s purpose is
to:
(1) In accordance with § 600.1012 of
subpart L, establish:
(i) The borrower’s obligation to repay
a reduction loan, and
(ii) The loan’s principal amount,
interest rate, and repayment term; and
(2) In accordance with §§ 600.1013
through 600.1016 of subpart L,
implement an industry fee system for
the reduction fishery.
(b) Definitions. Unless otherwise
defined in this section, the terms
defined in § 600.1000 of subpart L and
§ 600.1105 of this subpart expressly
apply to this section.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
Reduction fishery means the longline
catcher processor subsector of the BSAI
non-pollock groundfish fishery that
§ 679.2 of this chapter defined as
groundfish area/species endorsements.
(c) Reduction loan amount. The
reduction loan’s original principal
amount is $35,000,000.
(d) Interest accrual from inception.
Interest began accruing on the reduction
loan from May 29, 2007, the date on
which NMFS disbursed such loan.
(e) Interest rate. The reduction loan’s
interest rate shall be the applicable rate
which the U.S. Treasury determines at
the end of fiscal year 2007 plus 2
percent.
(f) Repayment term. For the purpose
of determining fee rates, the reduction
loan’s repayment term is 30 years from
May 29, 2007, but fees shall continue
indefinitely for as long as necessary to
fully repay the loan.
(g) Reduction loan repayment. (1) The
borrower shall, in accordance with
§ 600.1012, repay the reduction loan;
(2) For the purpose of the fee
collection, deposit, disbursement, and
accounting requirements of this subpart,
subsector members are deemed to be
both the fish buyer and fish seller. In
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39783
this case, all requirements and penalties
of § 600.1013 of this subpart that are
applicable to both a fish seller and a fish
buyer shall equally apply to parties
performing both functions;
(3) Subsector members in the
reduction fishery shall pay and collect
the fee amount in accordance with
§ 600.1105;
(4) Subsector members in the
reduction fishery shall, in accordance
with § 600.1014, deposit and disburse,
as well as keep records for and submit
reports about, the fees applicable to
such fishery; except the requirements
specified under paragraph (c) of this
section concerning the deposit principal
disbursement shall be made to NMFS no
later than fifteen (15) calendar days
following the end of each calendar
month; and the requirements specified
under paragraph (e) of this section
concerning annual reports which shall
be submitted to NMFS by February 1 of
each calendar year; and
(5) The reduction loan is, in all other
respects, subject to the provisions of
§§ 600.1012 through 600.1017.
[FR Doc. E7–14118 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\20JYP1.SGM
20JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 139 (Friday, July 20, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39779-39783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14118]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 600
[Docket No. 070607179-7312-01]
RIN 0648-AV66
Fishing Capacity Reduction Program for the Longline Catcher
Processor Subsector of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Non-Pollock
Groundfish Fishery, Industry Fee System
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to implement an industry fee system
for repaying a $35 million Federal loan financing a fishing capacity
reduction program in the longline catcher processor subsector of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) non-pollock groundfish fishery.
This action's intent is to implement a fee collection system to ensure
repayment of the loan.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received by August 20,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
E-mail: 0648-AV66.FeeSystem@noaa.gov. Include in the
subject line the following identifier: ``Longline catcher processor
buyback fee system proposed rule.'' E-mail comments, with or without
attachments, are limited to 5 megabytes;
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov;
Mail to: Leo Erwin, Chief, Financial Services Division,
NMFS-MB5, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910; or
Fax to 301-713-1306.
Comments involving the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of
the collection-of-information requirements contained in this proposed
rule should be submitted in writing to Leo Erwin, at the above address,
and to David Rostker, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email
at David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202 395 7285.
Copies of the Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/RIR/FRFA) prepared for the
program may be obtained from Leo Erwin at the above address.
[[Page 39780]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leo Erwin at 301-713 2390.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 312(b)-(e) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a(b) through (e)) generally
authorized fishing capacity reduction programs. In particular, section
312(d) authorized industry fee systems for repaying the reduction loans
which finance reduction program costs. Subpart L of 50 CFR part 600 is
the framework rule generally implementing sections 312(b)-(e). Subpart
M of 50 CFR part 600 contains specific fishery or program regulations.
Sections 1111 and 1112 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 App.
U.S.C. 1279f and 1279g) generally authorized reduction loans.
The FY 2005 Appropriations Act (Public Law 108-447, Section 219)
authorized a fishing capacity reduction program for the longline
catcher processor subsector of the BSAI non-pollock groundfish fishery
(reduction fishery).
NMFS published the longline catcher processor subsector BSAI non-
pollock reduction program's (reduction program) proposed implementation
rule on August 11, 2006 (71 FR 46364) and its final rule on September
29, 2006 (71 FR 57696). Anyone interested in the reduction program's
full implementation details should refer to these two documents. NMFS
proposed and adopted the reduction program's implementation rule as
Sec. 600.1105 of subpart M of 50 CFR part 600.
The reduction program's objectives include promoting sustainable
fishery management and maximum sustained reduction of fishing capacity
from the reduction fishery at the least cost. This is a voluntary
program in which, in return for reduction payments, selected offerors
permanently relinquished their fishing licenses, surrendered the
fishing histories upon which those licenses' issuance were based, and
permanently withdrew vessels from fishing.
NMFS financed the reduction program's $35 million cost, which post-
reduction BSAI non-pollock groundfish longline catcher processors repay
over an anticipated 30-year term but fees will continue indefinitely
for as long as necessary to fully repay the loan.
The fee amount, expressed in cents per pound rounded up to the next
one-tenth of a cent, will be based upon the annual principal and
interest due on the loan and could be up to 5 percent of longline
catcher processor subsector BSAI Pacific cod landings. In the event
that the total principal and interest due exceeds 5 percent of the ex-
vessel Pacific cod revenues, an additional fee of one penny per pound
will be assessed for pollock, arrowtooth flounder, Greenland turbot,
skate, yellowfin sole and rock sole.
The Freezer Longline Conservation Cooperative (FLCC) received
member offers and subsequently voted to accept four offers. The FLCC
submitted a fishing capacity reduction plan (reduction plan)
subsequently approved by NMFS. A referendum concerning the fees
necessary for repayment of the $35 million loan followed the offer and
acceptance process. Approval of the industry fee system required at
least two-thirds of the votes cast in the referendum to be in favor
before the reduction program could be implemented and payment tendered.
NMFS mailed ballots to 39 qualified referendum voters on March 21,
2007, after approving the reduction plan. The voting period opened on
March 21, 2007, and closed on April 6, 2007. NMFS received 34 timely
and valid votes. All of the votes approved the fees. This exceeded the
two-thirds minimum required for industry fee system approval.
Consequently, this referendum was successful and approved the industry
fee system.
On April 26, 2007, NMFS published a Federal Register notice (72 FR
20836) advising the public that NMFS would, beginning on May 29, 2007,
tender the reduction program's reduction payments to the four selected
offerors. On May 29, 2007, NMFS required the selected offerors to
permanently stop all fishing with the reduction vessels and permits.
Subsequently, NMFS:
1. Disbursed $35,000,000 in reduction payments to the four selected
offerors;
2. Revoked the relinquished reduction licenses;
3. Revoked each reduction vessel's fishing history;
4. Notified the National Vessel Documentation Center to revoke the
reduction vessels' fishery trade endorsements and appropriately
annotate the reduction vessel's document; and
5. Notified the U.S. Maritime Administration to prohibit the
reduction vessel's transfer to foreign ownership or registry.
Selected offerors participating in the reduction program have
received $35 million in exchange for relinquishing valid non-interim
Federal License Limitation Program BSAI groundfish licenses endorsed
for catcher processor fishing activity, catcher/processor, Pacific cod,
and hook and line gear, as well as any present or future claims of
eligibility for any fishing privilege based on such permit, and
additionally, any future fishing privilege of the vessel named on the
permit. Individual fishing quota shares are excluded from
relinquishment.
II. Proposed Regulations
NMFS has completed the reduction program except for implementing
the industry fee system which this action proposes to implement. The
fee amount will be calculated on an annual basis as: the principal and
interest payment amount due over the proceeding twelve months, divided
by the reduction fishery portion of the BSAI Pacific cod initial total
allowable catch (ITAC) allocation in metric tons multiplied by 2,205 to
convert into pounds, provided that the fees should not exceed 5 percent
of the average ex-vessel production value of the reduction fishery.
The terms defined in Sec. 600.1105 of the reduction program's
implementation rule and in Sec. 600.1000 of the framework rule apply
to this action.
The framework rule's Sec. 600.1013 governs fee payment and
collection in general, and this action applies the Sec. 600.1013
provisions to the reduction program.
Under Sec. 600.1013, the first ex-vessel buyers (fish buyers) of
post-reduction fish (fee fish) subject to an industry fee system must
withhold the fee from the trip proceeds which the fish buyers would
otherwise have paid to the parties (fish sellers) who harvested and
first sold the fee fish to the fish buyers. For the purpose of the fee
collection, deposit, disbursement, and accounting requirements of this
subpart, subsector members are deemed to be both the fish buyer and
fish seller. In this case, all requirements and penalties of Sec.
600.1013 of this subpart that are applicable to both a fish seller and
a fish buyer shall equally apply to parties performing both functions.
The BSAI Pacific cod ITAC was chosen as the basis for fee
calculation of the reduction program because Pacific cod is the only
directed fishery with a total allowable catch set in advance of the
fishing season. This methodology allows for a straightforward
calculation of the fee due and simplifies future accounting. The fee
will be assessed and collected on Pacific cod to the extent possible
and if the amount is not sufficient to cover annual principal and
interest due, additional fees will be assessed and collected. Fees will
be assessed and collected on all harvested Pacific cod, including that
used for bait or discarded. Although the fee could be up to 5 percent
of the ex-vessel
[[Page 39781]]
production value of all post-reduction longline catcher processor
subsector non-pollock groundfish landings, the fee will be less than 5
percent if NMFS projects that a lesser rate can amortize the fishery's
reduction loan over the reduction loan's 30-year term.
If the total principal and interest due exceeds five percent of the
ex-vessel Pacific cod revenues, a penny per pound round weight fee will
be calculated based on the latest available revenue records and NMFS
conversion factors for pollock, arrowtooth flounder, Greenland turbot,
skate, yellowfin sole and rock sole. Any additional fees will be
limited to the amount necessary to amortize the remaining twelve months
principal and interest in addition to the five percent fee assessed
against Pacific cod. If collections exceed the total principal and
interest needed to amortize the payment due, the principal balance of
the loan will be reduced.
To verify that the fees collected do not exceed five percent of the
reduction fishery revenues, the annual total of principal and interest
due will be compared with the latest available annual reduction fishery
revenues to ensure it is equal to or less than five percent of the
total ex-vessel production revenues. In all likelihood this will be
based on State of Alaska's Commercial Operator Annual Report produced
annually in the March following the close of the previous season. If
any of the components necessary to calculate the next year's fee are
not available, or for any other reason NMFS believes the calculation
must be postponed, the fee will remain at the previous year's amount
until such time that new calculations are made and communicated to the
post reduction fishery participants.
The framework rule's Sec. 600.1014 governs how fish buyers must
deposit, and later disburse to NMFS, the fees which they have collected
as well as how they must keep records of, and report about, collected
fees. Under the framework rule's Sec. 600.1014, fish buyers must, no
less frequently than at the end of each business week, deposit
collected fees through a date not more than two calendar days before
the date of deposit in segregated and federally insured accounts. Fees
shall be submitted to NMFS monthly and shall be due no later than
fifteen (15) calendar days following the end of each calendar month.
Fee collection reports must accompany these disbursements. Fish buyers
must maintain specified fee collection records for at least 3 years and
submit to NMFS annual reports of fee collection and disbursement
activities by February 1 of each calendar year.
Under Sec. 600.1015, the late charge to fish buyers for fee
payment, collection, deposit, and/or disbursement shall be one and one-
half (1.5) percent per month. The full late charge shall apply to the
fee for each month or portion of a month that the fee remains unpaid.
To provide more accessible services, streamline collections, and
save taxpayer dollars, fish buyers may disburse collected fee deposits
to NMFS by using a secure Federal system on the Internet known as
Pay.gov. Pay.gov enables subsector members to use their checking
accounts to electronically disburse their collected fee deposits to
NMFS. Subsector members who have access to the Internet should consider
using this quick and easy collected fee disbursement method. Subsector
members may access Pay.gov by going directly to Pay.gov's Federal
website at: https://www.pay.gov/paygov/.
Subsector members who do not have access to the Internet or who
simply do not wish to use the Pay.gov electronic system, must disburse
collected fee deposits to NMFS by sending a check to our lockbox at:
NOAA Fisheries Longline Catcher Processor Non-pollock Buyback
P O Box 979060
St. Louis, MO 63197-9000
Subsector members must not forget to include with their
disbursements the fee collection report applicable to each
disbursement. Subsector members using Pay.gov will find an electronic
fee collection report form to accompany electronic disbursements.
Subsector members who do not use Pay.gov must include a hard copy fee
collection report with each of their disbursements. Subsector members
not using Pay.gov may also access the NMFS website for a PDF version of
the fee collection report at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/mb/financial_
services/buyback.htm.
NMFS will, before the fee's effective date, separately mail a copy
of this rule, along with detailed fee payment, collection, deposit,
disbursement, recording, and reporting information and guidance, to
each fish seller and fish buyer of whom NMFS has notice. The fact that
any fish seller or fish buyer might not, however, receive from NMFS a
copy of the notice or of the information and guidance does not relieve
the fish seller or fish buyer from his fee obligations under the
applicable regulations.
All parties interested in this action should carefully read the
following framework rule sections, whose detailed provisions apply to
the fee system for repaying the reduction program's loan:
1. Sec. 600.1012;
2. Sec. 600.1013;
3. Sec. 600.1014;
4. Sec. 600.1015;
5. Sec. 600.1016; and
6. Sec. 600.1017.
NMFS, in accordance with the framework rule's Sec. 600.1013(d),
establishes the initial fee for the program's reduction fishery as 2.0
cents per pound. NMFS will then separately mail notification to each
affected fish seller and fish buyer of whom NMFS has notice. Until this
notification, fish sellers and fish buyers do not have to either pay or
collect the fee.
Please see the framework rule's Sec. 600.1000 for the definition
of ''delivery value'' and of the other terms relevant to this proposed
rule. Each disbursement of the reduction loan's $35,000,000 principal
amount began accruing interest as of the date of each such
disbursement. The loan's interest rate is the applicable rate, plus 2
percent, which the U.S. Treasury determines at the end of fiscal year
2007.
III. Classification
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NMFS, determined that
this proposed rule is consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2005, and other applicable laws.
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, NMFS
prepared an EA for the reduction program's final implementing rule
(September 29, 2006; 71 FR 57696). The EA discusses the impact of this
proposed rule on the natural and human environment and integrates an
RIR and a FRFA. The EA resulted in a finding of no significant impact.
The EA considered, among other alternatives, the implementation of the
fee payment and collection in this action. NMFS will send the EA, RIR,
and FRFA to anyone who requests a copy (see ADDRESSES).
NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), as
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), to
describe the economic impacts this proposed rule would have on small
entities. This proposed rule does not duplicate or conflict with other
Federal regulations.
IRFA Analysis
The Small Business Administration has defined small entities as all
fish harvesting businesses that are independently owned and operated,
not dominant in its field of operation, and with annual receipts of $4
million or less. In addition, processors with 500 or
[[Page 39782]]
fewer employees for related industries involved in canned or cured fish
and seafood, or preparing fresh fish and seafood, are also considered
small entities. Small entities within the scope of this proposed rule
include individual U.S. vessels and dealers. There are no
disproportionate impacts between large and small entities.
Description of the Number of Small Entities
The IRFA uses the most recent year of data available to conduct the
analysis (2003). Most firms operating in the reduction fishery have
annual gross revenues of less than $4 million. The IRFA analysis
estimates that 24 of the remaining 36 active longline catcher processor
vessels (i.e., 36 vessels constitute the post-reduction longline
subsector) that participated in 2003 are considered small entities. The
remaining 10 vessels are not considered small entities for purposes of
the RFA. There is 1 additional fisherman with a permit but no vessel
remaining in the longline subsector. The vessels that might be
considered large entities were either affiliated under owners of
multiple vessels or were catcher processors. However, little is known
about the ownership structure of the vessels in the fleet, so it is
possible that the IRFA overestimates the number of small entities.
Because the final reduction program rule has not resulted in changes to
allocation percentages and participation is voluntary, net effects are
expected to be minimal relative to the status quo.
The economic impact to communities where non-pollock groundfish are
landed and processed would be minimal because the harvest quotas and
allocations would not be altered. Fewer vessels in the catcher
processor fleet may mean that fewer on-shore fleet support services
would be required in Seattle and in Dutch Harbor. The communities would
see little change because total landings of non-pollock groundfish
would remain at current levels. Some beneficial impacts may occur
because this program has provided $35 million to successful offerors.
Much of this could be reinvested in the various communities which serve
as home ports to the vessels and a portion would be recovered through
income taxes. Crew employment opportunities will be reduced when
vessels were removed from the fishery. However, those vessels remaining
in the fishery will likely experience increased fishing opportunities
and higher per capita incomes.
The proposed rule's impact will be positive for both those whose
offers NMFS has accepted, the selected offerors who received payments
to stop fishing, and for post-reduction catcher processors whose
landing fees repay the reduction loan. The owners whose offers NMFS
accepted have relinquished their fishing licenses, reduction privilege
vessels where appropriate, and fishing histories in exchange for
payment. These payments ranged from $1.5 million for an inactive
license that was not attached to a vessel, up to $11.8 million for the
removal of both an active license and vessel from the fishery.
Those participants remaining in the fishery after the reduction
program will incur additional fees of up to 5 percent of the ex-vessel
production value of post-reduction landings. However, the additional
costs could be mitigated by increased harvest opportunities by post-
reduction fishermen. This is because removal of the vessels from the
fishery creates immediate benefits to the longline catcher processor
subsector by reducing competition pressure for each of the remaining
vessels to catch fish. In theory, each of the vessels retaining their
fishing licenses will be able to harvest more fish. This will likely
result in net benefits to the subsector members who have voluntarily
assumed the additional fees necessary to repay the reduction loan.
For example, even though each vessel could, on average, pay
approximately $77,440 in fees, the net increase per vessel, on average
could be approximately $302,560 more than they would have been able to
make before the reduction program's implementation due to the increased
opportunity to harvest the TAC. The referendum voters also cast votes
unanimously in favor of the fee collection system, which demonstrated
to NMFS the involved members of the fishing community have high
confidence in the cost-effectiveness of this buyback program.
This rule, when implemented, would affect neither authorized BSAI
Pacific cod ITAC and other non-pollock groundfish harvest levels or
harvesting practices.
NMFS rejected the no action alternative considered in the EA for
the final rule implementing the reduction program because NMFS would
not be in compliance with the mandate of Section 219 of the Act to
establish a reduction program. In addition, the longline catcher
processor subsector of the non-pollock groundfish fishery would remain
overcapitalized. Although too many vessels compete to catch the current
subsector ITAC allocation, fishermen remain in the fishery because they
have no other means to recover their significant capital investment.
Overcapitalization reduces the potential net value that could be
derived from the non-pollock groundfish resource, by dissipating rents,
driving variable operating costs up, and imposing economic
externalities. At the same time, excess capacity and effort diminish
the effectiveness of current management measures (e.g. landing limits
and seasons, bycatch reduction measures). Overcapitalization has
diminished the economic viability of members of the fleet and increased
the economic and social burden on fishery dependent communities.
It has been determined that this proposed rule is not significant
for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. OMB has approved these
information collections under OMB control number 0648 AU42. NMFS
estimates that the public reporting burden for these requirements will
average two hours for submitting a monthly fee collection report and
four hours for submitting an annual fish buyer report.
These response estimates include the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
information collection. Send comments regarding this burden estimate,
or any other aspect of this data collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to both NMFS and OMB (see ADDRESSES).
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person is subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with, any information collection subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that information collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 600
Fisheries, Fishing capacity reduction, Fishing permits, Fishing
vessels, Intergovernmental relations, Loan programs business, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 17, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons in the preamble, the National Marine Fisheries
Service proposes to amend 50 CFR part 600 as follows:
[[Page 39783]]
PART 600 MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 600 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. Section 600.1106 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 600.1106 Longline catcher processor subsector Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands (BSAI) non-pollock groundfish species fee payment and
collection system.
(a) Purpose. As authorized by Public Law 108 447, this section's
purpose is to:
(1) In accordance with Sec. 600.1012 of subpart L, establish:
(i) The borrower's obligation to repay a reduction loan, and
(ii) The loan's principal amount, interest rate, and repayment
term; and
(2) In accordance with Sec. Sec. 600.1013 through 600.1016 of
subpart L, implement an industry fee system for the reduction fishery.
(b) Definitions. Unless otherwise defined in this section, the
terms defined in Sec. 600.1000 of subpart L and Sec. 600.1105 of this
subpart expressly apply to this section.
Reduction fishery means the longline catcher processor subsector of
the BSAI non-pollock groundfish fishery that Sec. 679.2 of this
chapter defined as groundfish area/species endorsements.
(c) Reduction loan amount. The reduction loan's original principal
amount is $35,000,000.
(d) Interest accrual from inception. Interest began accruing on the
reduction loan from May 29, 2007, the date on which NMFS disbursed such
loan.
(e) Interest rate. The reduction loan's interest rate shall be the
applicable rate which the U.S. Treasury determines at the end of fiscal
year 2007 plus 2 percent.
(f) Repayment term. For the purpose of determining fee rates, the
reduction loan's repayment term is 30 years from May 29, 2007, but fees
shall continue indefinitely for as long as necessary to fully repay the
loan.
(g) Reduction loan repayment. (1) The borrower shall, in accordance
with Sec. 600.1012, repay the reduction loan;
(2) For the purpose of the fee collection, deposit, disbursement,
and accounting requirements of this subpart, subsector members are
deemed to be both the fish buyer and fish seller. In this case, all
requirements and penalties of Sec. 600.1013 of this subpart that are
applicable to both a fish seller and a fish buyer shall equally apply
to parties performing both functions;
(3) Subsector members in the reduction fishery shall pay and
collect the fee amount in accordance with Sec. 600.1105;
(4) Subsector members in the reduction fishery shall, in accordance
with Sec. 600.1014, deposit and disburse, as well as keep records for
and submit reports about, the fees applicable to such fishery; except
the requirements specified under paragraph (c) of this section
concerning the deposit principal disbursement shall be made to NMFS no
later than fifteen (15) calendar days following the end of each
calendar month; and the requirements specified under paragraph (e) of
this section concerning annual reports which shall be submitted to NMFS
by February 1 of each calendar year; and
(5) The reduction loan is, in all other respects, subject to the
provisions of Sec. Sec. 600.1012 through 600.1017.
[FR Doc. E7-14118 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S