United States Standards for Sorghum, 39730-39733 [07-3554]
Download as PDF
39730
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart J—[Reserved]
Title XIII—Business Credit and
Assistance; Chapter I—Small Business
Administration
PART 134—RULES OF PROCEDURE
GOVERNING CASES BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS
2. The authority citation for part 134
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 15 U.S.C. 632,
634(b)(6), 637(a), 648(l), 656(i), and 687(c);
E.O. 12549, 51 FR 6370, 3 CFR, 1986 Comp.,
p. 189.
§ 134.102
[Amended]
3. Section 134.102(p) of subpart B is
amended by removing ‘‘part 145 of this
chapter’’ and adding ‘‘2 CFR parts 180
and 2700’’ in its place.
I
PART 145—[REMOVED]
4. Under the authority of 15 U.S.C.
634, 13 CFR part 145 is removed.
I
Dated: July 12, 2007.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–14035 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
7 CFR Parts 800 and 810
RIN 0580–AA91
United States Standards for Sorghum
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are revising the United
States Standards for Sorghum to amend
the definitions of the classes Sorghum,
White sorghum, and Tannin sorghum,
and to amend the definition of nongrain
sorghum. We are amending the grade
limits for broken kernels and foreign
material (BNFM), and the subfactor
foreign material (FM). Additionally, we
are inserting a total count limit for other
material into the standards and revising
the method of certifying test weight
(TW). Further, we are changing the
inspection plan tolerances for BNFM
and FM. These changes will help
facilitate the marketing of sorghum.
DATES: Effective Date: June 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick McCluskey at GIPSA, USDA,
Suite 180 STOP 1404, 6501 Beacon
Drive, Kansas City, MO, 64133;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:38 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
Telephone (816) 823–4639; fax (816)
823–4644.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The United States Grain Standards
Act (USGSA) authorizes the Secretary of
Agriculture to establish official
standards of kind and class, quality and
condition for sorghum and other grains
(7 U.S.C. 76). The United States
Standards for Grain serve as the starting
point to define grain quality in the
marketplace. The United States
Standards for Sorghum are in the
regulations at 7 CFR 810.1401–
810.1405.
On September 24, 2003, GIPSA was
asked by the National Sorghum
Producers (NSP, formerly National
Grain Sorghum Producers) to initiate a
review of the sorghum standards.
Accordingly, in the December 17, 2003
Federal Register (68 FR 70201), through
an Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPR) we requested views
and comments on the sorghum
standards. We received 35 comments to
the ANPR. In the March 29, 2006
Federal Register (71 FR 15633–15639)
we invited comments to our proposed
rule identifying changes to the United
States Standards for Sorghum to:
(1) Delete the reference to tannin
content from definitions of Sorghum,
Tannin sorghum and White sorghum,
and define these classes based on the
presence or absence of a pigmented testa
(subcoat);
(2) Revise the definition of nongrain
sorghum by deleting sorghumsudangrass hybrids, sorgrass, and
adding language referencing seeds of
Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench that
appear atypical of grain sorghum;
(3) Reduce the grading limits for
broken kernels and foreign material
(BNFM) and the subfactor foreign
material (FM);
(4) Insert a total count limit of 10 for
other material used to determine sample
grade factors;
(5) Report the certification of sorghum
test weight in tenths of a pound per
bushel; and
(6) Revise the sorghum breakpoints
and associated grade limits for U.S. Nos.
1, 2, 3, and 4 BNFM and FM.
Comment Review
We received 11 comments expressing
a variety of views during the 60 day
comment period for the proposed rule.
We received comments from sorghum
producers, producer and other industry
organizations, grain handlers, and a
sorghum researcher.
Overall, the comments supported all
or a significant portion of the changes.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A few commenters opposed specific
portions of the changes. Some
commenters requested additional
changes beyond the scope of the
proposed rule: Deleting the separate
reference to FM but retaining the
standard for total BNFM in the sorghum
standard; deleting the reference to other
grains from the definition of Damaged
Kernels and Heat-damaged Kernels; and
standardizing feed grain standards. We
will consider these comments for future
work on the standards.
Sorghum Class Definitions
We proposed removing the reference
to tannin content from definitions of
Sorghum, Tannin sorghum and White
sorghum, and define these classes based
on the presence or absence of a
pigmented testa (subcoat). We received
nine comments on the proposal to
remove the word tannin from the class
definitions of Sorghum, Tannin
sorghum, and White sorghum. Eight
commenters directly supported the
proposal as written and the other
commenter did not oppose the proposal
as written. No comments were received
opposing the proposal. Of the
supporting comments, most used
identical language to state that defining
sorghum based on the lack of a
pigmented testa (subcoat) addressed the
concerns of sorghum marketing
organizations. Accordingly, we are
amending the sorghum standards to
remove the reference to tannin content
from definitions of Sorghum, Tannin
sorghum and White sorghum, and
define these classes based on the
presence or absence of a pigmented testa
(subcoat), as set forth in the proposal.
Nongrain Sorghum Definition
We proposed changing the definition
of nongrain sorghum by (1) removing
sorgrass and sorghum-sudangrass
hybrids by (2) adding the words ‘‘seeds
of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench that
appear atypical of grain sorghum.’’ No
commenters opposed or supported the
proposal as written. Sorghumsudangrass hybrids (botanically,
Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), despite
being grown as a forage crop, can either
produce kernels which appear typical of
grain sorghum or kernels that appear
atypical of grain sorghum. We continue
to believe that there is no reason to
count kernels which appear typical of
grain sorghum as nongrain sorghum,
and this proposed change is made final
herein.
Comments were received supporting
the removal of sweet sorghum (sorgo)
from the definition of nongrain sorghum
because botanically, sweet sorghum is
Sorghum bicolor (l.) Moench, as is grain
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass
hybrid. We discussed removing sweet
sorghum (sorgo) from the definition of
nongrain sorghum in the proposed rule
but did not propose it as a change to the
standards, taking into account
comments received as a result of the
ANPR. Sweet sorghum plants can
produce kernels that appear either
typical or atypical of grain sorghum.
Using the same rationale applied to
sorghum-sudangrass hybrids, we believe
there is no reason to count sweet
sorghum kernels which appear typical
of grain sorghum as nongrain sorghum.
Further, the additional wording ‘‘and
seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench
that appear atypical of grain sorghum’’
will allow sweet sorghum kernels which
appear atypical of grain sorghum to be
counted as nongrain sorghum.
Therefore, based on the comments
received, we will delete sweet sorghum
(sorgo) from the definition of nongrain
sorghum.
Finally, comments noted that
producers appear to be restricted from
receiving any program support from
USDA because of the continuing
classification of sweet sorghum as a
nongrain. However, market conditions
drive standards development and
amendment, not eligibility for program
support from USDA. Nonetheless, the
definition of nongrain sorghum will be
changed, but not because of this
comment.
BNFM and FM Grade Limits
We proposed reducing the grade
limits for BNFM and the subfactor FM.
Comments noted that proposed
revisions to the limits for BNFM and the
subfactor FM would make it very
difficult to achieve U.S. Number 1. We
carefully considered the technical
constraints and concerns raised as a
result of this proposed change.
Currently, U.S. Number 2 is the
common trading standard and our
analysis showed virtually no difference
in the percentage of sorghum receiving
the Number 2 grade (BNFM: 100.0
percent versus 99.8 percent; FM: 99.9
percent versus 95.8 percent) as a result
of reducing the grade limits. We believe
there will be no aggregate negative
impact on the export sorghum market.
Likewise, we believe changes to the
sorghum standards must serve to
improve market efficiency and
encourage the production and delivery
of high quality sorghum. Therefore, we
are making no changes based on this
comment.
Total Other Material Count
We proposed limiting the total
number of pieces of other material upon
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:38 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
which sample grade factor
determinations are made. Eight
comments were received supporting the
proposal specifically or by inference. No
comments were received opposing the
proposal. Sorghum is used as a food
grain in much of the world, thus the
sample grade limit for sorghum should
be consistent with the sample grade
limits for other grains used as food.
Accordingly, we are amending the
sorghum standards to include a
maximum count limit of 10 for the total
of other material used to determine
sample grade factors.
Test Weight Certification
We proposed revising the certification
of sorghum test weight from TW from
whole and half pounds, with a fraction
of a half pound disregarded, to
certification in tenths of a pound. One
comment was received in support of the
proposal, and no comments were
received opposing the proposal as
written. Accordingly, as set forth in the
proposal, we are amending the grain
standards to revise the certification of
sorghum test weight.
Inspection Plan Tolerances
Shiplots, unit trains, and lash barge
lots are inspected with a statistically
based inspection plan. Inspection
tolerances, commonly referred to as
Breakpoints (BP), are used to determine
acceptable quality. The revisions to the
sorghum standards require revisions to
some breakpoints. Accordingly, we are
revising Table 15 of section 800.86(c)(2)
to reflect the corresponding changes in
the established inspection plan
tolerances. The grade limits (GL) for
sorghum are also revised in Table 15.
Effective Date
As specified in the USGSA (7 U.S.C.
76(b)), amendments to the standards
cannot become effective less than one
calendar year after public notification,
unless in the judgment of the Secretary,
the public health, interest, or safety
require that they become effective
sooner. In accordance with that section
of the Act, it is determined that it is in
the public interest to have this final rule
effective on June 1, 2008, in order to
coincide with the start of the 2008
sorghum harvest, and to facilitate
domestic and export marketing of
sorghum.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This action has been determined to be
exempt for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866, and therefore has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39731
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires agencies
to consider the economic impact of each
rule on small entities and evaluate
alternatives that would accomplish the
objectives of the rule without unduly
burdening small entities or erecting
barriers that would restrict their ability
to compete in the market.
We are amending the grain standards
to change the definition of sorghum
classes by deleting references to tannin
and adding language referencing the
presence or absence of a pigmented
testa. We are amending the definition of
nongrain sorghum by removing
sorghum-sudangrass hybrids, sorgrass,
and sweet sorghum (sorgo), and adding
language referencing seeds of Sorghum
bicolor (L.) Moench that appear atypical
of grain sorghum. We are amending the
grade and grade requirements for
sorghum by reducing the grading limits
for broken kernels and foreign material
(BNFM) and the subfactor foreign
material (FM), and inserting a total
count limit of 10 for other material used
to determine sample grade factors. We
are amending the grain standards to
report the certification of test weight in
tenths of a pound. The changes made to
the sorghum standards in this final rule
are needed to ensure market-relevant
standards and grades and facilitate the
marketing of grain.
Under the provisions of the USGSA,
grain exported from the United States
must be officially inspected and
weighed. The regulations and standards
are applied equally to all entities.
We provide mandatory inspection and
weighing services at 33 export elevators
(including four floating elevators). All of
these facilities are owned by multinational corporations, large
cooperatives, or public entities that do
not meet the requirements for small
entities established by the Small
Business Administration.
The U.S. sorghum industry, including
producers (approximately 40,000
(USDA–2002 Census of Agriculture)),
handlers, processors, and merchandisers
are the primary users of the U.S.
Standards for Sorghum and utilize the
official standards as a common trading
language to market grain sorghum. We
assume that some of the entities may be
small.
In addition to GIPSA, there are 55
official agencies that perform official
services under the USGSA. Most users
of the official inspection and weighing
services, and the entities that perform
these services, do not meet the
regulations for small entities.
The USGSA (7 U.S.C. 87f–1) requires
the registration of all persons engaged in
the business of buying, handling,
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
39732
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
weighing, or transporting grain for sale
in foreign commerce. The USGSA
regulations (7 CFR 800.30) define a
foreign commerce grain business as
persons who regularly engage in buying
for sale, handling, weighing, or
transporting grain totaling 15,000 metric
tons or more during the preceding or
current calendar year. At present, there
are 92 registrants who account for
practically 100 percent of U.S. sorghum
exports, which for fiscal year (FY) 2005
totaled approximately 3,138,580 metric
tons (MT). While most of the 89
registrants are large businesses, we
assume some may be small.
GIPSA determined that this final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, as defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the existing information
collection requirements are approved
under OMB Number 0580–0013. No
additional collection or recordkeeping
requirements are imposed on the public
by this final rule. Accordingly, OMB
clearance is not required by section
350(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or OMB’s
implementing regulation at 5 CFR part
1320.
E-Government Compliance
We are committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Executive Order 12988
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, instructs each executive agency
to adhere to certain requirements in the
development of new and revised
regulations in order to avoid unduly
burdening the court system. The final
rule was reviewed under this Executive
Order and no additional related
information has been obtained since
then. This final rule is not intended to
have a retroactive effect. The United
States Grain Standards Act provides in
Section 87g that no State or subdivision
may require or impose any requirements
or restrictions concerning the
inspection, weighing, or description of
grain under the USGSA. Otherwise, this
final rule will not preempt any State or
local laws, regulations, or policies,
unless they present any irreconcilable
conflict with this rule. There are no
administrative procedures which must
be exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this final
rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 800
Administrative practice and
procedure, Conflict of interests, Exports,
Freedom of information, Grains,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 810
Exports, Grains.
For reasons set out in the preamble, 7
CFR parts 800 and 810 are amended as
follows:
I
PART 800—GENERAL REGULATIONS
1. Revise the authority citation for part
800 to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k.
2. In § 800.86(c)(2), revise table 15 to
read as follows:
I
§ 800.86 Inspection of shiplot, unit train
and lash barge grain in single lots.
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
*
*
TABLE 15.—GRADE LIMITS (GL) AND BREAKPOINTS (BP) FOR SORGHUM
Maximum limits of—
Minimum test
weight per
bushel
(pounds)
Grade
Heat-damaged
(percent)
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
No.
No.
No.
No.
1 ............................................................................
2 ............................................................................
3 1 ..........................................................................
4 ............................................................................
1 Sorghum
*
*
*
*
*
3. Revise the authority citation for part
810 to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k.
4. In § 810.102, revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
I
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
BP
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.4
GL
BP
0.2
0.1
0.5 ¥0.4
1.0
0.5
3.0
0.8
Total
(percent)
GL
2.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
BP
1.1
1.8
2.3
2.8
Total
(percent)
GL
3.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
BP
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Foreign
material
(percent)
GL
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
BP
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
that is distinctly discolored shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 3.
PART 810—OFFICIAL UNITED STATES
STANDARDS FOR GRAIN
§ 810.102
GL
57.0
55.0
53.0
51.0
Broken kernels and foreign
material
Damaged kernels
Definition of other terms.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Test Weight per bushel. The
weight per Winchester bushel (2,150.42
cubic inches) as determined using an
approved device according to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:38 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
procedures prescribed in FGIS
instructions. Test weight per bushel in
the standards for corn, mixed grain,
oats, sorghum, and soybeans is
determined on the original sample. Test
weight per bushel in the standards for
barley, flaxseed, rye, sunflower seed,
triticale, and wheat is determined after
mechanically cleaning the original
sample. Test weight per bushel is
recorded to the nearest tenth pound for
corn, rye, sorghum, soybeans, triticale,
and wheat. Test weight per bushel for
all other grains, if applicable, is
recorded in whole and half pounds with
a fraction of a half pound disregarded.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Test weight per bushel is not an official
factor for canola.
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. In § 810.1402, revise paragraphs
(c)(1) through (c)(3) and (h) to read as
follows:
§ 810.1402
*
Definition of other terms.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Sorghum. Sorghum which lacks a
pigmented testa (subcoat) and contains
less than 98.0 percent White sorghum
and not more than 3.0 percent Tannin
sorghum. The pericarp color of this
class may appear white, yellow, red,
pink, orange or bronze.
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
39733
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Tannin sorghum. Sorghum which
has a pigmented testa (subcoat) and
contains not more than 10 percent of
kernels without a pigmented testa.
(3) White sorghum. Sorghum which
lacks a pigmented testa (subcoat) and
contains not less than 98.0 percent
kernels with a white pericarp, and
contains not more than 2.0 percent of
sorghum of other classes. This class
includes sorghum containing spots that,
singly or in combination, cover 25.0
percent or less of the kernel.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Nongrain sorghum. Seeds of
broomcorn, Johnson-grass, Sorghum
almum Parodi, and sudangrass; and
seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench
that appear atypical of grain sorghum.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Revise § 810.1404 to read as
follows:
I
§ 810.1404 Grades and grade requirements
for sorghum.
Grades U.S. Nos. 1
Grading factors
1
2
3
4
57.0
55.0
53.0
51.0
0.2
2.0
0.5
5.0
1.0
10.0
3.0
15.0
1.0
3.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
8.0
4.0
10.0
9
1
2
1
7
3
7
10
9
1
2
1
7
3
7
10
9
1
2
1
7
3
7
10
9
1
2
1
7
3
7
10
Minimum pound limits of
Test weight per bushel ............................................................................................................................................
Maximum percent limits of
Damaged kernels:
Heat (part of total) ............................................................................................................................................
Total ...........................................................................................................................................................
Broken kernels and foreign material:
Foreign material (part of total) ..........................................................................................................................
Total ...........................................................................................................................................................
Maximum count limits of
Other material:
Animal filth ........................................................................................................................................................
Castor beans .............................................................................................................................................
Crotalaria seeds ........................................................................................................................................
Glass .........................................................................................................................................................
Stones 2 .....................................................................................................................................................
Unknown foreign substance ......................................................................................................................
Cockleburs .................................................................................................................................................
Total 3 ........................................................................................................................................................
U.S. Sample grade is sorghum that:
(a) Does not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or
(b) Has a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except smut odor); or
(c) Is badly weathered, heating, or distinctly low quality.
1 Sorghum
which is distinctly discolored shall not grade higher than U.S. No. 3.
weight of stones must also exceed 0.2 percent of the sample weight.
any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria seeds, glass, stones, unknown foreign substance or cockleburs.
2 Aggregate
3 Includes
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. 07–3554 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
Annual Fees for Reactor Licenses and
Fuel Cycle Licenses and Materials
Licenses, Including Holders of
Certificates of Compliance,
Registrations, and Quality Assurance
Program Approvals and Government
Agencies Licensed by the NRC
CFR Correction
In Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 51 to 199, revised as
of January 1, 2007, in § 171.16, on page
14:38 Jul 19, 2007
§ 171.16 Annual fees: Materials licensees,
holders of certificates of compliance,
holders of sealed source and device
registrations, holders of quality assurance
program approvals, and government
agencies licensed by the NRC.
*
10 CFR Part 171
VerDate Aug<31>2005
742, paragraph (e) is reinstated to read
as follows:
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
(e) The activities comprising the
surcharge are as follows:
(1) LLW disposal generic activities;
(2) Activities not directly attributable
to an existing NRC licensee or class(es)
of licenses (e.g., international
cooperative safety program and
international safeguards activities;
support for the Agreement State
program; decommissioning activities for
unlicensed sites; and activities for
unregistered general licensees); and
(3) Activities not currently assessed
licensing and inspection fees under 10
CFR part 170 based on existing law or
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Commission policy (e.g., reviews and
inspections of nonprofit educational
institutions and reviews for Federal
agencies; activities related to
decommissioning and reclamation; and
costs that would not be collected from
small entities based on Commission
policy in accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.).
[FR Doc. 07–55509 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM
20JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 139 (Friday, July 20, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39730-39733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3554]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration
7 CFR Parts 800 and 810
RIN 0580-AA91
United States Standards for Sorghum
AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are revising the United States Standards for Sorghum to
amend the definitions of the classes Sorghum, White sorghum, and Tannin
sorghum, and to amend the definition of nongrain sorghum. We are
amending the grade limits for broken kernels and foreign material
(BNFM), and the subfactor foreign material (FM). Additionally, we are
inserting a total count limit for other material into the standards and
revising the method of certifying test weight (TW). Further, we are
changing the inspection plan tolerances for BNFM and FM. These changes
will help facilitate the marketing of sorghum.
DATES: Effective Date: June 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick McCluskey at GIPSA, USDA,
Suite 180 STOP 1404, 6501 Beacon Drive, Kansas City, MO, 64133;
Telephone (816) 823-4639; fax (816) 823-4644.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The United States Grain Standards Act (USGSA) authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to establish official standards of kind and
class, quality and condition for sorghum and other grains (7 U.S.C.
76). The United States Standards for Grain serve as the starting point
to define grain quality in the marketplace. The United States Standards
for Sorghum are in the regulations at 7 CFR 810.1401-810.1405.
On September 24, 2003, GIPSA was asked by the National Sorghum
Producers (NSP, formerly National Grain Sorghum Producers) to initiate
a review of the sorghum standards. Accordingly, in the December 17,
2003 Federal Register (68 FR 70201), through an Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) we requested views and comments on the
sorghum standards. We received 35 comments to the ANPR. In the March
29, 2006 Federal Register (71 FR 15633-15639) we invited comments to
our proposed rule identifying changes to the United States Standards
for Sorghum to:
(1) Delete the reference to tannin content from definitions of
Sorghum, Tannin sorghum and White sorghum, and define these classes
based on the presence or absence of a pigmented testa (subcoat);
(2) Revise the definition of nongrain sorghum by deleting sorghum-
sudangrass hybrids, sorgrass, and adding language referencing seeds of
Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench that appear atypical of grain sorghum;
(3) Reduce the grading limits for broken kernels and foreign
material (BNFM) and the subfactor foreign material (FM);
(4) Insert a total count limit of 10 for other material used to
determine sample grade factors;
(5) Report the certification of sorghum test weight in tenths of a
pound per bushel; and
(6) Revise the sorghum breakpoints and associated grade limits for
U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 BNFM and FM.
Comment Review
We received 11 comments expressing a variety of views during the 60
day comment period for the proposed rule. We received comments from
sorghum producers, producer and other industry organizations, grain
handlers, and a sorghum researcher.
Overall, the comments supported all or a significant portion of the
changes. A few commenters opposed specific portions of the changes.
Some commenters requested additional changes beyond the scope of the
proposed rule: Deleting the separate reference to FM but retaining the
standard for total BNFM in the sorghum standard; deleting the reference
to other grains from the definition of Damaged Kernels and Heat-damaged
Kernels; and standardizing feed grain standards. We will consider these
comments for future work on the standards.
Sorghum Class Definitions
We proposed removing the reference to tannin content from
definitions of Sorghum, Tannin sorghum and White sorghum, and define
these classes based on the presence or absence of a pigmented testa
(subcoat). We received nine comments on the proposal to remove the word
tannin from the class definitions of Sorghum, Tannin sorghum, and White
sorghum. Eight commenters directly supported the proposal as written
and the other commenter did not oppose the proposal as written. No
comments were received opposing the proposal. Of the supporting
comments, most used identical language to state that defining sorghum
based on the lack of a pigmented testa (subcoat) addressed the concerns
of sorghum marketing organizations. Accordingly, we are amending the
sorghum standards to remove the reference to tannin content from
definitions of Sorghum, Tannin sorghum and White sorghum, and define
these classes based on the presence or absence of a pigmented testa
(subcoat), as set forth in the proposal.
Nongrain Sorghum Definition
We proposed changing the definition of nongrain sorghum by (1)
removing sorgrass and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids by (2) adding the
words ``seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench that appear atypical of
grain sorghum.'' No commenters opposed or supported the proposal as
written. Sorghum-sudangrass hybrids (botanically, Sorghum bicolor (L.)
Moench), despite being grown as a forage crop, can either produce
kernels which appear typical of grain sorghum or kernels that appear
atypical of grain sorghum. We continue to believe that there is no
reason to count kernels which appear typical of grain sorghum as
nongrain sorghum, and this proposed change is made final herein.
Comments were received supporting the removal of sweet sorghum
(sorgo) from the definition of nongrain sorghum because botanically,
sweet sorghum is Sorghum bicolor (l.) Moench, as is grain
[[Page 39731]]
sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. We discussed removing sweet
sorghum (sorgo) from the definition of nongrain sorghum in the proposed
rule but did not propose it as a change to the standards, taking into
account comments received as a result of the ANPR. Sweet sorghum plants
can produce kernels that appear either typical or atypical of grain
sorghum. Using the same rationale applied to sorghum-sudangrass
hybrids, we believe there is no reason to count sweet sorghum kernels
which appear typical of grain sorghum as nongrain sorghum. Further, the
additional wording ``and seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench that
appear atypical of grain sorghum'' will allow sweet sorghum kernels
which appear atypical of grain sorghum to be counted as nongrain
sorghum. Therefore, based on the comments received, we will delete
sweet sorghum (sorgo) from the definition of nongrain sorghum.
Finally, comments noted that producers appear to be restricted from
receiving any program support from USDA because of the continuing
classification of sweet sorghum as a nongrain. However, market
conditions drive standards development and amendment, not eligibility
for program support from USDA. Nonetheless, the definition of nongrain
sorghum will be changed, but not because of this comment.
BNFM and FM Grade Limits
We proposed reducing the grade limits for BNFM and the subfactor
FM. Comments noted that proposed revisions to the limits for BNFM and
the subfactor FM would make it very difficult to achieve U.S. Number 1.
We carefully considered the technical constraints and concerns raised
as a result of this proposed change. Currently, U.S. Number 2 is the
common trading standard and our analysis showed virtually no difference
in the percentage of sorghum receiving the Number 2 grade (BNFM: 100.0
percent versus 99.8 percent; FM: 99.9 percent versus 95.8 percent) as a
result of reducing the grade limits. We believe there will be no
aggregate negative impact on the export sorghum market. Likewise, we
believe changes to the sorghum standards must serve to improve market
efficiency and encourage the production and delivery of high quality
sorghum. Therefore, we are making no changes based on this comment.
Total Other Material Count
We proposed limiting the total number of pieces of other material
upon which sample grade factor determinations are made. Eight comments
were received supporting the proposal specifically or by inference. No
comments were received opposing the proposal. Sorghum is used as a food
grain in much of the world, thus the sample grade limit for sorghum
should be consistent with the sample grade limits for other grains used
as food. Accordingly, we are amending the sorghum standards to include
a maximum count limit of 10 for the total of other material used to
determine sample grade factors.
Test Weight Certification
We proposed revising the certification of sorghum test weight from
TW from whole and half pounds, with a fraction of a half pound
disregarded, to certification in tenths of a pound. One comment was
received in support of the proposal, and no comments were received
opposing the proposal as written. Accordingly, as set forth in the
proposal, we are amending the grain standards to revise the
certification of sorghum test weight.
Inspection Plan Tolerances
Shiplots, unit trains, and lash barge lots are inspected with a
statistically based inspection plan. Inspection tolerances, commonly
referred to as Breakpoints (BP), are used to determine acceptable
quality. The revisions to the sorghum standards require revisions to
some breakpoints. Accordingly, we are revising Table 15 of section
800.86(c)(2) to reflect the corresponding changes in the established
inspection plan tolerances. The grade limits (GL) for sorghum are also
revised in Table 15.
Effective Date
As specified in the USGSA (7 U.S.C. 76(b)), amendments to the
standards cannot become effective less than one calendar year after
public notification, unless in the judgment of the Secretary, the
public health, interest, or safety require that they become effective
sooner. In accordance with that section of the Act, it is determined
that it is in the public interest to have this final rule effective on
June 1, 2008, in order to coincide with the start of the 2008 sorghum
harvest, and to facilitate domestic and export marketing of sorghum.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action has been determined to be exempt for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866, and therefore has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires agencies to consider the economic impact of each rule on small
entities and evaluate alternatives that would accomplish the objectives
of the rule without unduly burdening small entities or erecting
barriers that would restrict their ability to compete in the market.
We are amending the grain standards to change the definition of
sorghum classes by deleting references to tannin and adding language
referencing the presence or absence of a pigmented testa. We are
amending the definition of nongrain sorghum by removing sorghum-
sudangrass hybrids, sorgrass, and sweet sorghum (sorgo), and adding
language referencing seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench that appear
atypical of grain sorghum. We are amending the grade and grade
requirements for sorghum by reducing the grading limits for broken
kernels and foreign material (BNFM) and the subfactor foreign material
(FM), and inserting a total count limit of 10 for other material used
to determine sample grade factors. We are amending the grain standards
to report the certification of test weight in tenths of a pound. The
changes made to the sorghum standards in this final rule are needed to
ensure market-relevant standards and grades and facilitate the
marketing of grain.
Under the provisions of the USGSA, grain exported from the United
States must be officially inspected and weighed. The regulations and
standards are applied equally to all entities.
We provide mandatory inspection and weighing services at 33 export
elevators (including four floating elevators). All of these facilities
are owned by multi-national corporations, large cooperatives, or public
entities that do not meet the requirements for small entities
established by the Small Business Administration.
The U.S. sorghum industry, including producers (approximately
40,000 (USDA-2002 Census of Agriculture)), handlers, processors, and
merchandisers are the primary users of the U.S. Standards for Sorghum
and utilize the official standards as a common trading language to
market grain sorghum. We assume that some of the entities may be small.
In addition to GIPSA, there are 55 official agencies that perform
official services under the USGSA. Most users of the official
inspection and weighing services, and the entities that perform these
services, do not meet the regulations for small entities.
The USGSA (7 U.S.C. 87f-1) requires the registration of all persons
engaged in the business of buying, handling,
[[Page 39732]]
weighing, or transporting grain for sale in foreign commerce. The USGSA
regulations (7 CFR 800.30) define a foreign commerce grain business as
persons who regularly engage in buying for sale, handling, weighing, or
transporting grain totaling 15,000 metric tons or more during the
preceding or current calendar year. At present, there are 92
registrants who account for practically 100 percent of U.S. sorghum
exports, which for fiscal year (FY) 2005 totaled approximately
3,138,580 metric tons (MT). While most of the 89 registrants are large
businesses, we assume some may be small.
GIPSA determined that this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, as defined
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the existing
information collection requirements are approved under OMB Number 0580-
0013. No additional collection or recordkeeping requirements are
imposed on the public by this final rule. Accordingly, OMB clearance is
not required by section 350(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or OMB's implementing regulation at 5 CFR part
1320.
E-Government Compliance
We are committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Executive Order 12988
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, instructs each
executive agency to adhere to certain requirements in the development
of new and revised regulations in order to avoid unduly burdening the
court system. The final rule was reviewed under this Executive Order
and no additional related information has been obtained since then.
This final rule is not intended to have a retroactive effect. The
United States Grain Standards Act provides in Section 87g that no State
or subdivision may require or impose any requirements or restrictions
concerning the inspection, weighing, or description of grain under the
USGSA. Otherwise, this final rule will not preempt any State or local
laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present any irreconcilable
conflict with this rule. There are no administrative procedures which
must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of
this final rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 800
Administrative practice and procedure, Conflict of interests,
Exports, Freedom of information, Grains, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 810
Exports, Grains.
0
For reasons set out in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 800 and 810 are
amended as follows:
PART 800--GENERAL REGULATIONS
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 800 to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87k.
0
2. In Sec. 800.86(c)(2), revise table 15 to read as follows:
Sec. 800.86 Inspection of shiplot, unit train and lash barge grain in
single lots.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
Table 15.--Grade Limits (GL) and Breakpoints (BP) for Sorghum
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum limits of--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Damaged kernels Broken kernels and foreign
Minimum test ---------------------------------- material
Grade weight per ---------------------------------
bushel (pounds) Heat-damaged Foreign
(percent) Total (percent) Total (percent) material
(percent)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GL BP GL BP GL BP GL BP GL BP
U.S. No. 1......................................................... 57.0 -0.4 0.2 0.1 2.0 1.1 3.0 0.5 1.0 0.4
U.S. No. 2......................................................... 55.0 -0.4 0.5 -0.4 5.0 1.8 6.0 0.6 2.0 0.5
U.S. No. 3 \1\..................................................... 53.0 -0.4 1.0 0.5 10.0 2.3 8.0 0.7 3.0 0.6
U.S. No. 4......................................................... 51.0 -0.4 3.0 0.8 15.0 2.8 10.0 0.8 4.0 0.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Sorghum that is distinctly discolored shall be graded not higher than U.S. No. 3.
* * * * *
PART 810--OFFICIAL UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR GRAIN
0
3. Revise the authority citation for part 810 to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87k.
0
4. In Sec. 810.102, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 810.102 Definition of other terms.
* * * * *
(d) Test Weight per bushel. The weight per Winchester bushel
(2,150.42 cubic inches) as determined using an approved device
according to procedures prescribed in FGIS instructions. Test weight
per bushel in the standards for corn, mixed grain, oats, sorghum, and
soybeans is determined on the original sample. Test weight per bushel
in the standards for barley, flaxseed, rye, sunflower seed, triticale,
and wheat is determined after mechanically cleaning the original
sample. Test weight per bushel is recorded to the nearest tenth pound
for corn, rye, sorghum, soybeans, triticale, and wheat. Test weight per
bushel for all other grains, if applicable, is recorded in whole and
half pounds with a fraction of a half pound disregarded. Test weight
per bushel is not an official factor for canola.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 810.1402, revise paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) and (h)
to read as follows:
Sec. 810.1402 Definition of other terms.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Sorghum. Sorghum which lacks a pigmented testa (subcoat) and
contains less than 98.0 percent White sorghum and not more than 3.0
percent Tannin sorghum. The pericarp color of this class may appear
white, yellow, red, pink, orange or bronze.
[[Page 39733]]
(2) Tannin sorghum. Sorghum which has a pigmented testa (subcoat)
and contains not more than 10 percent of kernels without a pigmented
testa.
(3) White sorghum. Sorghum which lacks a pigmented testa (subcoat)
and contains not less than 98.0 percent kernels with a white pericarp,
and contains not more than 2.0 percent of sorghum of other classes.
This class includes sorghum containing spots that, singly or in
combination, cover 25.0 percent or less of the kernel.
* * * * *
(h) Nongrain sorghum. Seeds of broomcorn, Johnson-grass, Sorghum
almum Parodi, and sudangrass; and seeds of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench
that appear atypical of grain sorghum.
* * * * *
0
6. Revise Sec. 810.1404 to read as follows:
Sec. 810.1404 Grades and grade requirements for sorghum.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grades U.S. Nos. \1\
Grading factors -------------------------------
1 2 3 4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum pound limits of
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test weight per bushel.................. 57.0 55.0 53.0 51.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum percent limits of
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damaged kernels:
Heat (part of total)................ 0.2 0.5 1.0 3.0
Total........................... 2.0 5.0 10.0 15.0
Broken kernels and foreign material:
Foreign material (part of total).... 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Total........................... 3.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum count limits of
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other material:
Animal filth........................ 9 9 9 9
Castor beans.................... 1 1 1 1
Crotalaria seeds................ 2 2 2 2
Glass........................... 1 1 1 1
Stones \2\...................... 7 7 7 7
Unknown foreign substance....... 3 3 3 3
Cockleburs...................... 7 7 7 7
Total \3\....................... 10 10 10 10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Sample grade is sorghum that:
(a) Does not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, or 4; or
(b) Has a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor
(except smut odor); or
(c) Is badly weathered, heating, or distinctly low quality.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Sorghum which is distinctly discolored shall not grade higher than
U.S. No. 3.
\2\ Aggregate weight of stones must also exceed 0.2 percent of the
sample weight.
\3\ Includes any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria
seeds, glass, stones, unknown foreign substance or cockleburs.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards
Administration.
[FR Doc. 07-3554 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P