Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records, 39803-39804 [07-3534]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Notices
of MCBQ to accommodate
approximately 3,000 personnel directed
to MCBQ by the 2005 BRAC law, and
potential development within the
Westside to accommodate up to 2,000
additional personnel, or 5,000 personnel
total including BRAC, to support other
Marine Corps requirements.
DATES: The public comment period for
the DEIS will end 45 days after
publication of an NOA in the Federal
Register by the Environmental
Protection Agency. All comments must
be received by 4 September 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please send written
comments on the DEIS to: Jeff Gardner,
NREA Branch (B046), 3250 Catlin
Avenue, Marine Corps Base, Quantico,
VA 22134–0855. E-mail comments
should be sent to jeff.gardner@usmc.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Jeff Gardner 703–432–6784 during
normal business hours Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Marine Corp Base Quantico, Virginia
proposes development of the Westside
of MCBQ, including the 2005 Base
Realignment and Closure (BRAC) action
at MCBQ. The development would
entail construction of new facilities in
two undeveloped areas west of
Interstate 95. These areas, the Russell
Road Area and the MCB–1 Area, would
co-locate Military Department
Investigative Agency Headquarters with
the Counterintelligence Field Activity
and Defense Security Service at MCBQ
as directed by the 2005 BRAC law. The
areas would also provide adequate
space for facilities to support Marine
Corps units currently at MCBQ, as well
as potentially other federal and Marine
Corps initiatives that may identify
MCBQ as a site for relocation.
This DEIS identifies and evaluates the
potential environmental impacts of (1)
Alternative A (BRAC Action), the
relocation of approximately 3,000
personnel directed to MCBQ by the
BRAC Law; (2) Alternative B, the
relocation of an additional 2,000
personnel for a total of 5,000 personnel,
including those under Alternative A;
and (3) the No Action Alternative.
Under both Alternatives A and B, two
sites for the BRAC action, one located in
the southern portion of the Russell Road
Area, and the other in the northern
portion of the MCB–1 Area, are
analyzed as the BRAC site options
(BRAC Option 1 (Russell Road) and
BRAC Option 2 (MCB–1)).
The Notice of Intent (NOI) published
for this EIS in the Federal Register on
3 August 2006 identified five
alternatives, including the no action
alternative, for analysis in this EIS. In
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
addition to Alternatives A and B, the
NOI indicated that a high intensity
development alternative would be
assessed that would add up to 10,000
personnel, including 3,000 under BRAC,
and a medium intensity development
alternative would be assessed that
would add up to 7,000 personnel,
including 3,000 under BRAC. Following
a preliminary assessment of the
proposed sites west of I–95 and further
examination of known requirements,
only Alternatives A and B were carried
forward for analysis.
At this time, a preferred alternative
has not been selected. The DEIS analysis
indicate that the increased level of
development and personnel under
Alternative B compared to Alternative A
would be expected to cause a
commensurate increase in the level of
impacts.
The DEIS finds that traffic impacts at
base access points are similar for both
alternatives. Major MCBQ access points
currently perform unacceptably and
regional growth will further degrade
intersections unless improvements are
made. Alternatives have unacceptable
levels of service at U.S. Route 1 and I–
95 intersections, and at proposed
development sites. The DEIS identifies
traffic mitigation measures.
The DEIS also finds that the amount
of development from the proposed
alternatives is small compared to the
amount of undeveloped land that would
remain, largely forested, minimizing
impacts to natural resources. There
would be no effect to threatened and
endangered species; however,
alternatives could impact a small
amount of wetlands. The DEIS finds that
potential regional growth from either
alternative is not large compared to
projected growth already expected for
the surrounding region and the resulting
socioeconomic impacts from either
alternative are less than significant.
Potential impacts, such as noise, caused
by proximity to military training
activities that would remain in the
Westside, can be acceptably minimized
in the facility design process, and
development is a compatible land use at
the proposed sites. The sites avoid
impacting cultural resources and air
emissions are not expected to exceed
the thresholds established for general
conformity to state implementation
plans or to require a new source review.
The DEIS has been distributed to
various federal, state, and local
agencies, elected officials, special
interest groups, and interested parties.
The DEIS is also available for public
review at the following local libraries:
Central Rappahannock Regional Library,
Dumfries Neighborhood Library, and the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39803
Prince William Public Library System.
The DEIS is also available at the
following Web site: https://
www.quantico.usmc.mil/activities/
display.aspx?PID=1814&Section=NREA.
The Marine Corps invites the general
public, local governments, other federal
agencies, and state agencies to submit
written comments or suggestions
concerning the alternatives and analysis
addressed in the DEIS. The public and
government agencies are invited to
participate in the public meetings where
oral and written comments will be
received. Two public meetings will be
held. The first public meeting will be
held on 6 August 2007 from 7:30 p.m.
to 9:30 p.m. at the Stafford County
Government Center Board Room, 1300
Courthouse Road, Stafford, VA. The
second public meeting will be held on
13 August 2007 from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30
p.m. at the Doctor A. J. Ferlazzo
Building, 15941 Donald Curtis Drive,
Prince William, VA. All comments must
be received by 4 September 2007.
Dated: July 16, 2007.
L.R. Almand,
Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S.
Navy, Administrative Law Division, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–14126 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of Navy
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice to delete a System of
Records.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
is deleting a system of records in its
existing inventory of record systems
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5
U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
DATES: This proposed action will be
effective without further notice on
August 20, 2007 unless comments are
received which result in a contrary
determination.
Send comments to the
Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA
Policy Branch, Chief of Naval
Operations (DNS–36), 2000 Navy
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350–2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
Doris Lama at (202) 685–6545.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department the Navy systems of records
notices subject to the Privacy Act of
1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have
been published in the Federal Register
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
39804
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 139 / Friday, July 20, 2007 / Notices
and are available from the address
above.
The Department of Navy proposes to
delete a system of records notice from
its inventory of record systems subject
to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C.
552a), as amended. The proposed
deletion is not within the purview of
subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which
requires the submission of new or
altered systems reports.
Dated: July 13, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
N12930–2
SYSTEM NAME:
Area Coordinator Information and
Operation Files (February 22, 1993, 58
FR 10825).
REASON:
Program changed which required the
establishment of a new system. The new
system is N12713–1, Equal Employment
Opportunity (EEO) Complaints Tracking
System which was published in the
Federal Register on May 14, 2007, 72
FR 27094.
[FR Doc. 07–3534 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management, invites
comments on the proposed information
collection requests as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
September 18, 2007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The IC Clearance
Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Jul 19, 2007
Jkt 211001
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g., new, revision, extension, existing
or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary
of the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
Dated: July 16, 2007.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: Revision.
Title: National Evaluation of the
Comprehensive Technical Assistance
Centers.
Frequency: One time.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 2,124.
Burden Hours: 1,709.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is
to evaluate the Comprehensive
Technical Assistance Centers created to
assist state education agencies with the
implementation of the requirements of
No Child Left Behind legislation. Four
key methods will be used in this study:
(1) Site visits conducted to each Center
to learn about the Center’s relationships
with its clients and the types of
products and services that are delivered;
(2) expert panel review of a sample of
projects undertaken by each Center to
assess the quality of the technical
assistance provided; (3) a survey of
Center clients to rate the relevance,
usefulness and other aspects of the
services they have received; and (4) a
survey of senior SEA officials who are
responsible for negotiating with the
Centers to ensure that the nature of
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
technical assistance provided
corresponds to state priorities.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 3414. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington,
D.C. 20202–4700. Requests may also be
electronically mailed to:
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
245–6623. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to:
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E7–14027 Filed 7–19–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Federal Pell Grant, Academic
Competitiveness Grant, National
Science and Mathematics Access To
Retain Talent Grant, Federal Perkins
Loan, Federal Work-Study, Federal
Supplemental Educational Opportunity
Grant, Federal Family Education Loan,
and William D. Ford Federal Direct
Loan Programs; Correction
Federal Student Aid, U.S.
Department of Education.
ACTION: Correction; Notice of revision of
the Federal Need Analysis Methodology
for the 2008–2009 award year.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We correct two column
headings for the Education Savings and
Asset Protection Allowance tables in the
notice published on June 1, 2007 (72 FR
30570).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 1,
2007, we published a notice in the
Federal Register (72 FR 30568–30572),
Notice of revision of the Federal Need
Analysis Methodology for the 2008–
2009 award year. The heading ‘‘If the
age of the student is’’ (as published in
the three tables on page 30570) is
corrected to read, ‘‘If the age of the older
parent is’’. This correction should be
made only to the first of the three tables,
titled ‘‘Dependent Students’’ on page
30570. The right column of the same
table (Dependent Students) is labeled,
E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM
20JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 139 (Friday, July 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39803-39804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3534]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of Navy
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Notice to delete a System of Records.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy is deleting a system of records in
its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of
1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on
August 20, 2007 unless comments are received which result in a contrary
determination.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA Policy
Branch, Chief of Naval Operations (DNS-36), 2000 Navy Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20350-2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Doris Lama at (202) 685-6545.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department the Navy systems of records
notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as
amended, have been published in the Federal Register
[[Page 39804]]
and are available from the address above.
The Department of Navy proposes to delete a system of records
notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not
within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of new or
altered systems reports.
Dated: July 13, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
N12930-2
System name:
Area Coordinator Information and Operation Files (February 22,
1993, 58 FR 10825).
Reason:
Program changed which required the establishment of a new system.
The new system is N12713-1, Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)
Complaints Tracking System which was published in the Federal Register
on May 14, 2007, 72 FR 27094.
[FR Doc. 07-3534 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
