Draft Legislative Environmental Impact Statement (LEIS) for the Limestone Hills Training Area Land Withdrawal, Montana Army National Guard (MTARNG), 39062 [07-3472]
Download as PDF
39062
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 17, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Draft Legislative Environmental Impact
Statement (LEIS) for the Limestone
Hills Training Area Land Withdrawal,
Montana Army National Guard
(MTARNG)
National Guard Bureau (NGB),
Department of the Army (DA), DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This LEIS has been prepared
by NGB (lead agency) and the
Department of the Interior’s (DOIs)
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
(cooperating agency). The LEIS analyzes
the proposed withdrawal of 18,644 acres
of federal land within the Limestone
Hills Training Area (LHTA) from BLM
administration. The LEIS proposes that
the DOI and Congress transfer
administrative responsibility of all
federal land within the LHTA to the
Army for military training use by the
MTARNG. No new facilities are
proposed in this LEIS.
DATES: The public comment period for
the Draft LEIS will end 90 days after
publication of an NOA in the Federal
Register by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: Written comments or
questions should be forwarded by mail
to Ms. Sundi West, MTARNG, Fort
Harrison, P.O. Box 4789, Helena,
Montana 59604–4789; via telephone at
(406) 324–3088, or via e-mail at
Sundi.West@us.army.mil.
Ms.
Mary L. Figarelle, BLM, 106 North
Parkmont, Butte, Montana 59701; via
telephone at (406) 533-7671; or via email at Mary_Figarelle@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
objective of the LEIS is to provide
comprehensive analysis of the proposed
action and alternatives to the Secretaries
of Interior and Army so findings and
recommendations can be forwarded to
Congress regarding the proposed land
withdrawal. The study area for the
environmental analysis is resource
dependent. It includes Lewis and Clark
County and Broadwater County for
socioeconomic resources, MTARNG
facilities for military mission, and the
LHTA for biological and mineral
resources.
The LEIS analyzes potential
environmental effects of four
alternatives:
(1) Alternative 1: Under this
alternative, management responsibility
for all resources, except for mineral
resources, would be shifted from the
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Jul 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
BLM to the MTARNG. The DA could
exercise its authority to condemn
private land, and/or terminate any
mineral claim or grazing permits under
this alternative.
(2) Alternative 2: Under this
alternative, the MTARNG and BLM
would share resource management
responsibilities. Most resources in the
LHTAs closure area would be managed
by MTARNG. Most resources in the
nonclosure area would be managed by
the BLM. The closure area is the portion
of the LHTA that restricts access
without prior approval of the MTARNG.
The nonclosure area is the portion of the
LHTA that is open to public access for
surface use only.
(3) Alternative 3 (Preferred
Alternative): Under the preferred
alternative, the LHTA would be
withdrawn from BLM jurisdiction with
modifications based on scoping
comments and stakeholder
recommendations. The proposed
withdrawal area is approximately
18,644 acres of federal land that
encloses 2,666 acres of state owned and
private land. Land proposed for
withdrawal is limited to BLM
administrated land within the
withdrawal boundary. If does not
include private or state owned land.
(4) Alternative 4 (No Action
Alternative): Under this alternative, the
BLMs current right-of-way grant for
military use of the LHTA by MTARNG
would not be renewed and would expire
in 2014.
Significant Issues: The LHTA is a
23,100-acre parcel of land with private
and state owned in-holdings totaling
approximately 2,666 acres. The BLM
managed 20,460 acres of the total
acreage and allows the MTARNG to
conduct military training on its property
through the right-of-way grant. The
public land is also used for grazing,
mining, recreation, transportation,
utility right-of-ways, and wildlife
management. A limestone mine is
currently operating within the LHTA.
Every federally managed acre of the
LHTA falls within ne of seven grazing
allotments. In addition, the MTARNG is
currently engaged in clearing
unexploded ordnance from an LHTA
range that is no longer in use.
Issues in the LEIS include the
following: (1) Continued ability of
Graymont Western’s Indian Creek
Limestone Mine to extract and process
ore within the LHTA; (2) allocation and
management of grazing allotments; (3)
public access to the LHTA; (4) noise and
dust generated during training exercises
and by vehicular traffic; (5) impacts to
Broadwater County due to possible
termination of FLM payments in lieu of
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
taxes if the withdrawal is granted; (6)
potential impacts to wildlife I the
Elkhorn Management Area; (7)
consistency of land management
policies after transfer of administrative
responsibilities; (8) potential impacts to
range management and cleanup
activities; (9) owner access to, and use
of, in-holdings; and (10) impacts to the
local economy and MTARNG training
under the no action alternative.
Potential significant adverse impacts
to socioeconomics are expected under
Alternatives 1 and 4. There are no
potentially significant adverse impacts
expected under Alternative 2 or 3
(Preferred Alternative).
The DA, through MTARNG, is
continuing its public comment process
for this action. Public meetings will be
held during the LEIS public review
period.
Dated: July 3, 2007.
H.E. Wolfe,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Army (Environment, Safety and Occupational
Health).
[FR Doc. 07–3472 Filed 7–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites
comments on the submission for OMB
review as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before August
16, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Education Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10222,
Washington, DC 20503. Commenters are
encouraged to submit responses
electronically by e-mail to:
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or via fax
to (202) 395–6974. Commenters should
include the following subject line in
their response ‘‘Comment: [insert OMB
number], [insert abbreviated collection
name, e.g., ‘‘Upward Bound
Evaluation’’]. Persons submitting
comments electronically should not
submit paper copies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
E:\FR\FM\17JYN1.SGM
17JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 39062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-3472]
[[Page 39062]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Draft Legislative Environmental Impact Statement (LEIS) for the
Limestone Hills Training Area Land Withdrawal, Montana Army National
Guard (MTARNG)
AGENCY: National Guard Bureau (NGB), Department of the Army (DA), DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This LEIS has been prepared by NGB (lead agency) and the
Department of the Interior's (DOIs) Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
(cooperating agency). The LEIS analyzes the proposed withdrawal of
18,644 acres of federal land within the Limestone Hills Training Area
(LHTA) from BLM administration. The LEIS proposes that the DOI and
Congress transfer administrative responsibility of all federal land
within the LHTA to the Army for military training use by the MTARNG. No
new facilities are proposed in this LEIS.
DATES: The public comment period for the Draft LEIS will end 90 days
after publication of an NOA in the Federal Register by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: Written comments or questions should be forwarded by mail to
Ms. Sundi West, MTARNG, Fort Harrison, P.O. Box 4789, Helena, Montana
59604-4789; via telephone at (406) 324-3088, or via e-mail at
Sundi.West@us.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mary L. Figarelle, BLM, 106 North
Parkmont, Butte, Montana 59701; via telephone at (406) 533-7671; or via
e-mail at Mary--Figarelle@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The objective of the LEIS is to provide
comprehensive analysis of the proposed action and alternatives to the
Secretaries of Interior and Army so findings and recommendations can be
forwarded to Congress regarding the proposed land withdrawal. The study
area for the environmental analysis is resource dependent. It includes
Lewis and Clark County and Broadwater County for socioeconomic
resources, MTARNG facilities for military mission, and the LHTA for
biological and mineral resources.
The LEIS analyzes potential environmental effects of four
alternatives:
(1) Alternative 1: Under this alternative, management
responsibility for all resources, except for mineral resources, would
be shifted from the BLM to the MTARNG. The DA could exercise its
authority to condemn private land, and/or terminate any mineral claim
or grazing permits under this alternative.
(2) Alternative 2: Under this alternative, the MTARNG and BLM would
share resource management responsibilities. Most resources in the LHTAs
closure area would be managed by MTARNG. Most resources in the
nonclosure area would be managed by the BLM. The closure area is the
portion of the LHTA that restricts access without prior approval of the
MTARNG. The nonclosure area is the portion of the LHTA that is open to
public access for surface use only.
(3) Alternative 3 (Preferred Alternative): Under the preferred
alternative, the LHTA would be withdrawn from BLM jurisdiction with
modifications based on scoping comments and stakeholder
recommendations. The proposed withdrawal area is approximately 18,644
acres of federal land that encloses 2,666 acres of state owned and
private land. Land proposed for withdrawal is limited to BLM
administrated land within the withdrawal boundary. If does not include
private or state owned land.
(4) Alternative 4 (No Action Alternative): Under this alternative,
the BLMs current right-of-way grant for military use of the LHTA by
MTARNG would not be renewed and would expire in 2014.
Significant Issues: The LHTA is a 23,100-acre parcel of land with
private and state owned in-holdings totaling approximately 2,666 acres.
The BLM managed 20,460 acres of the total acreage and allows the MTARNG
to conduct military training on its property through the right-of-way
grant. The public land is also used for grazing, mining, recreation,
transportation, utility right-of-ways, and wildlife management. A
limestone mine is currently operating within the LHTA. Every federally
managed acre of the LHTA falls within ne of seven grazing allotments.
In addition, the MTARNG is currently engaged in clearing unexploded
ordnance from an LHTA range that is no longer in use.
Issues in the LEIS include the following: (1) Continued ability of
Graymont Western's Indian Creek Limestone Mine to extract and process
ore within the LHTA; (2) allocation and management of grazing
allotments; (3) public access to the LHTA; (4) noise and dust generated
during training exercises and by vehicular traffic; (5) impacts to
Broadwater County due to possible termination of FLM payments in lieu
of taxes if the withdrawal is granted; (6) potential impacts to
wildlife I the Elkhorn Management Area; (7) consistency of land
management policies after transfer of administrative responsibilities;
(8) potential impacts to range management and cleanup activities; (9)
owner access to, and use of, in-holdings; and (10) impacts to the local
economy and MTARNG training under the no action alternative.
Potential significant adverse impacts to socioeconomics are
expected under Alternatives 1 and 4. There are no potentially
significant adverse impacts expected under Alternative 2 or 3
(Preferred Alternative).
The DA, through MTARNG, is continuing its public comment process
for this action. Public meetings will be held during the LEIS public
review period.
Dated: July 3, 2007.
H.E. Wolfe,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety
and Occupational Health).
[FR Doc. 07-3472 Filed 7-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M