Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation of Exemptions, 38749-38750 [E7-13576]
Download as PDF
38749
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 135
Monday, July 16, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2007–0044]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation of
Exemptions
Privacy Office, Office of the
Secretary, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On July 27, 2006 the
Department of Homeland Security
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking to exempt portions of the
Automated Biometric Identification
System (IDENT) system of records from
one or more provisions of the Privacy
Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement
requirements. No comments were
received so this final rule adopts the
proposed rule of July 27, 2006, without
change.
DATES: This final rule is effective August
15, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Claire Miller, Acting US–VISIT Privacy
Officer, Washington, DC 20528, by
telephone (202) 298–5200, or by
facsimile (202) 298–5201.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ycherry on PRODPC74 with RULES
Background
On July 27, 2006 the Department of
Homeland Security published a notice
of proposed rulemaking to exempt
portions of the Automated Biometric
Identification System (IDENT) system of
records notice from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act because of
criminal, civil, and administrative
enforcement requirements. This
proposed rule would exempt certain
records from the access and amendment
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
provisions of law as permitted by the
Privacy Act. No comments were
received in response to this notice of
proposed rulemaking, so this final rule
adopts the proposed rule of July 27,
2006, without change.
IDENT is the primary repository of
biometric information held by DHS in
connection with its several and varied
missions and functions, including, but
not limited to: The enforcement of civil
and criminal laws (including the
immigration law); investigations,
inquiries, and proceedings thereunder;
and national security and intelligence
activities. IDENT is a centralized and
dynamic DHS-wide biometric database
that also contains limited biographic,
unique identifiers, and encounter
history information needed to place the
biometric information in proper context.
The information is collected by, on
behalf of, in support of, or in
cooperation with DHS and its
components and may contain personally
identifiable information collected by
other Federal, State, local, tribal,
foreign, or international government
agencies.
The Privacy Act requires each agency
to publish in the Federal Register a
description of the type and character of
each system of records that the agency
maintains, and the routine uses that are
contained in each system in order to
make agency recordkeeping practices
transparent, to notify individuals
regarding the uses to which personally
identifiable information is put, and to
assist individuals in finding such files
within the agency.
The Privacy Act allows Government
agencies to exempt certain records from
the access and amendment provisions. If
an agency claims an exemption,
however, it must issue a rulemaking to
make clear to the public the reasons
why a particular exemption is claimed.
By this rule DHS is claiming
exemption from certain requirements of
the Privacy Act for IDENT. Some
information in IDENT relates to official
DHS national security, immigration and
border management, and law
enforcement activities. These
exemptions are needed to protect
information relating to DHS activities
from disclosure to subjects or others
related to these activities. Specifically,
the exemptions are required to preclude
subjects of these activities from
frustrating these processes; to avoid
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
disclosure of activity techniques; to
protect the identities and physical safety
of confidential informants and of
immigration and border management
and law enforcement personnel; to
ensure DHS’s ability to obtain
information from third parties and other
sources; to protect the privacy of third
parties; and to safeguard classified
information. Disclosure of information
to the subject of the inquiry could also
permit the subject to avoid detection or
apprehension.
The exemptions are standard law
enforcement and national security
exemptions exercised by a large number
of Federal law enforcement and
intelligence agencies. In appropriate
circumstances, where compliance
would not appear to interfere with or
adversely affect the law enforcement
purposes of this system and the overall
law enforcement process, the applicable
exemptions may be waived.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Privacy, Freedom of information.
I For the reasons stated in the preamble,
DHS amends Chapter I of Title 6, Code
of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135,
6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart B
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Amend Appendix C to part 5 by
adding a new section 4 to read as
follows:
I
Appendix C—DHS Systems of Records
Exempt From the Privacy Act
*
*
*
*
*
4. The Department of Homeland Security
Automated Biometric Identification System
(IDENT) consists of electronic and paper
records and will be used by DHS and its
components. IDENT is the primary repository
of biometric information held by DHS in
connection with its several and varied
missions and functions, including, but not
limited to: The enforcement of civil and
criminal laws (including the immigration
law); investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings thereunder; and national
security and intelligence activities. IDENT is
a centralized and dynamic DHS-wide
biometric database that also contains limited
biographic and encounter history information
needed to place the biometric information in
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
ycherry on PRODPC74 with RULES
38750
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
proper context. The information is collected
by, on behalf of, in support of, or in
cooperation with DHS and its components
and may contain personally identifiable
information collected by other Federal, State,
local, tribal, foreign, or international
government agencies.
Pursuant to exemptions 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2)
of the Privacy Act, portions of this system are
exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (4); (d);
(e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(5)
and (e)(8); (f)(2) through (5); and (g). Pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), this system is exempt
from the following provisions of the Privacy
Act, subject to the limitations set forth in
those subsections: 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3), (d),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), and (e)(4)(H). Exemptions
from these particular subsections are
justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for
the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4)
(Accounting for Disclosures) because release
of the accounting of disclosures could alert
the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of the investigation;
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation, to the existence of the
investigation, and reveal investigative
interest on the part of DHS or another agency.
Access to the records could permit the
individual who is the subject of a record to
impede the investigation, to tamper with
witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection
or apprehension. Amendment of the records
could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and would
impose an impossible administrative burden
by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of
Information from Individuals) because
requiring that information be collected from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
the subject of an investigation would alert the
subject to the nature or existence of an
investigation, thereby interfering with the
related investigation and law enforcement
activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
information would impede law enforcement
in that it could compromise the existence of
a confidential investigation or reveal the
identity of witnesses or confidential
informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H)
(Agency Requirements), and (f)(2 through 5)
(Agency Rules) because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) and thereby
would not require DHS to establish
requirements or rules for records which are
exempted from access.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of
Information) because in the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes it
is impossible to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete. Compliance with (e)(5) would
preclude DHS agents from using their
investigative training and exercise of good
judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’ ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal, and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(i) From subsection (g) to the extent that
the system is exempt from other specific
subsections of the Privacy Act.
Dated: July 5, 2007.
Hugo Teufel III,
Chief Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–13576 Filed 7–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket Number DHS–2007–0047]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; Redress and Response
Records System
Privacy Office, Office of the
Secretary, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security is issuing a final rule to amend
its regulations to exempt portions of a
new system of records entitled the
Redress and Response Records System
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act. Specifically, the Department
proposes to exempt portions of the
Redress and Response Records System
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
from one or more provisions of the
Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
and administrative enforcement
requirements.
Effective Date: This final rule is
effective July 16, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hugo Teufel III, Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528;
telephone 703–235–0780; facsimile:
866–466–5370.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
On January 18, 2007, DHS published
notice of a new Privacy Act system of
records entitled ‘‘Redress and Response
Records System, DHS/ALL–005.’’ 1 The
DHS Redress and Response Records
System maintains records for the DHS
Traveler Redress Inquiry Program
(TRIP), which is the traveler redress
mechanism established by DHS in
connection with the Rice-Chertoff
Initiative, as well as in accordance with
other policy and law. DHS TRIP will
facilitate the public’s ability to provide
appropriate information to DHS for
redress requests when they believe they
have been denied entry, refused
boarding for transportation, or identified
for additional screening by DHS
components or programs at their
operational locations. Such locations
include airports, seaports, train stations,
and land borders. DHS TRIP will create
a cohesive process to address these
redress requests across DHS.
DHS TRIP will serve as a mechanism
to share redress-related information and
facilitate communication of redress
results across DHS components. It will
also facilitate efficient adjudication of
redress requests. Once the information
intake is complete, DHS TRIP will
facilitate the transfer of or access to this
information for the DHS components or
other agencies that will address the
redress request.
This system contains records
pertaining to various categories of
individuals, including: Individuals
seeking redress or individuals on whose
behalf redress is sought from DHS;
individuals applying for redress on
behalf of another individual; and DHS
employees and contractors assigned to
interact with the redress process.
No exemption shall be asserted with
respect to information submitted by and
collected from individuals or their
representatives in the course of any
redress process associated with this
System of Records.
1 72
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
FR 2296 (January 18, 2007).
16JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 135 (Monday, July 16, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38749-38750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13576]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 135 / Monday, July 16, 2007 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 38749]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2007-0044]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation of Exemptions
AGENCY: Privacy Office, Office of the Secretary, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On July 27, 2006 the Department of Homeland Security published
a notice of proposed rulemaking to exempt portions of the Automated
Biometric Identification System (IDENT) system of records from one or
more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement requirements. No comments were received so
this final rule adopts the proposed rule of July 27, 2006, without
change.
DATES: This final rule is effective August 15, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claire Miller, Acting US-VISIT Privacy
Officer, Washington, DC 20528, by telephone (202) 298-5200, or by
facsimile (202) 298-5201.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 27, 2006 the Department of Homeland Security published a
notice of proposed rulemaking to exempt portions of the Automated
Biometric Identification System (IDENT) system of records notice from
one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
and administrative enforcement requirements. This proposed rule would
exempt certain records from the access and amendment provisions of law
as permitted by the Privacy Act. No comments were received in response
to this notice of proposed rulemaking, so this final rule adopts the
proposed rule of July 27, 2006, without change.
IDENT is the primary repository of biometric information held by
DHS in connection with its several and varied missions and functions,
including, but not limited to: The enforcement of civil and criminal
laws (including the immigration law); investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings thereunder; and national security and intelligence
activities. IDENT is a centralized and dynamic DHS-wide biometric
database that also contains limited biographic, unique identifiers, and
encounter history information needed to place the biometric information
in proper context. The information is collected by, on behalf of, in
support of, or in cooperation with DHS and its components and may
contain personally identifiable information collected by other Federal,
State, local, tribal, foreign, or international government agencies.
The Privacy Act requires each agency to publish in the Federal
Register a description of the type and character of each system of
records that the agency maintains, and the routine uses that are
contained in each system in order to make agency recordkeeping
practices transparent, to notify individuals regarding the uses to
which personally identifiable information is put, and to assist
individuals in finding such files within the agency.
The Privacy Act allows Government agencies to exempt certain
records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims
an exemption, however, it must issue a rulemaking to make clear to the
public the reasons why a particular exemption is claimed.
By this rule DHS is claiming exemption from certain requirements of
the Privacy Act for IDENT. Some information in IDENT relates to
official DHS national security, immigration and border management, and
law enforcement activities. These exemptions are needed to protect
information relating to DHS activities from disclosure to subjects or
others related to these activities. Specifically, the exemptions are
required to preclude subjects of these activities from frustrating
these processes; to avoid disclosure of activity techniques; to protect
the identities and physical safety of confidential informants and of
immigration and border management and law enforcement personnel; to
ensure DHS's ability to obtain information from third parties and other
sources; to protect the privacy of third parties; and to safeguard
classified information. Disclosure of information to the subject of the
inquiry could also permit the subject to avoid detection or
apprehension.
The exemptions are standard law enforcement and national security
exemptions exercised by a large number of Federal law enforcement and
intelligence agencies. In appropriate circumstances, where compliance
would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the law
enforcement purposes of this system and the overall law enforcement
process, the applicable exemptions may be waived.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Privacy, Freedom of information.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS amends Chapter I of Title
6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et
seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Amend Appendix C to part 5 by adding a new section 4 to read as
follows:
Appendix C--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
* * * * *
4. The Department of Homeland Security Automated Biometric
Identification System (IDENT) consists of electronic and paper
records and will be used by DHS and its components. IDENT is the
primary repository of biometric information held by DHS in
connection with its several and varied missions and functions,
including, but not limited to: The enforcement of civil and criminal
laws (including the immigration law); investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings thereunder; and national security and intelligence
activities. IDENT is a centralized and dynamic DHS-wide biometric
database that also contains limited biographic and encounter history
information needed to place the biometric information in
[[Page 38750]]
proper context. The information is collected by, on behalf of, in
support of, or in cooperation with DHS and its components and may
contain personally identifiable information collected by other
Federal, State, local, tribal, foreign, or international government
agencies.
Pursuant to exemptions 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) of the Privacy Act,
portions of this system are exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (4);
(d); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(5) and
(e)(8); (f)(2) through (5); and (g). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2), this system is exempt from the following provisions of
the Privacy Act, subject to the limitations set forth in those
subsections: 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), and
(e)(4)(H). Exemptions from these particular subsections are
justified, on a case-by-case basis to be determined at the time a
request is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures)
because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of the
investigation; and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would
therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts
and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a
record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would
undermine the entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation, to the existence of the
investigation, and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
or another agency. Access to the records could permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to
tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing
investigations and law enforcement activities and would impose an
impossible administrative burden by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access and
amendment to such information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear or the information may not be
strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to retain
all information that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from
Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the
nature or existence of an investigation, thereby interfering with
the related investigation and law enforcement activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because
providing such detailed information would impede law enforcement in
that it could compromise the existence of a confidential
investigation or reveal the identity of witnesses or confidential
informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H) (Agency Requirements),
and (f)(2 through 5) (Agency Rules) because portions of this system
are exempt from the individual access provisions of subsection (d)
and thereby would not require DHS to establish requirements or rules
for records which are exempted from access.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because
in the collection of information for law enforcement purposes it is
impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with (e)(5) would
preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training and
exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because
compliance would interfere with DHS' ability to obtain, serve, and
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that
may be filed under seal, and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(i) From subsection (g) to the extent that the system is exempt
from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
Dated: July 5, 2007.
Hugo Teufel III,
Chief Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-13576 Filed 7-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-P