Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated Counties in Washington and in Umatilla County, Oregon; Decreased Assessment Rate, 38463-38465 [E7-13583]
Download as PDF
38463
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 134
Friday, July 13, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 924
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0087; FV07–924–
1 IFR]
Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington and in
Umatilla County, Oregon; Decreased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule decreases the
assessment rate established for the
Washington-Oregon Fresh Prune
Marketing Committee (Committee) for
the 2007–2008 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $1.75 to $1.00 per ton of
prunes handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order, which
regulates the handling of fresh prunes
grown in designated counties in
Washington and in Umatilla County,
Oregon. Assessments upon fresh prune
handlers are used by the Committee to
fund reasonable and necessary expenses
of the program. The fiscal period began
April 1 and ends March 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective July 16, 2007.
Comments received by September 11,
2007, will be considered prior to
issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Jul 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
reference the docket number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
suite 385, Portland, OR 97204;
telephone: (503) 326–2724; Fax: (503)
326–7440; or E-mail:
Robert.Curry@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–
0237; telephone: (202) 720–2491; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 924 (7 CFR part 924),
regulating the handling of fresh prunes
grown in designated counties in
Washington and in Umatilla County,
Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, Washington-Oregon prune
handlers are subject to assessments.
Funds to administer the order are
derived from such assessments. It is
intended that the assessment rate as
issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable prunes beginning April 1,
2007, and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule decreases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2007–2008 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $1.75 to $1.00 per ton of
prunes handled.
The order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are
producers and handlers in designated
counties in Washington and in Umatilla
County, Oregon. They are familiar with
the Committee’s needs and with the
costs for goods and services in their
local area and are thus in a position to
formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate
was formulated and discussed at a
public meeting, thus all directly affected
persons had an opportunity to
participate and provide input.
For the 2004–2005 and subsequent
fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an
assessment rate of $1.75 per ton of fresh
prunes handled. This assessment rate
continues in effect from fiscal period to
fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 29, 2007,
and unanimously recommended 2007–
2008 expenditures of $9,043 and a
decreased assessment rate of $1.00 per
ton. In comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $5,600. The
assessment rate of $1.00 is $0.75 lower
than the rate in effect since the 2004–
E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM
13JYR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
38464
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 134 / Friday, July 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
2005 fiscal period. The Committee
recommended the assessment rate
change for the purpose of lowering its
monetary reserve to a level
commensurate with the maximum
permitted by the order of approximately
one fiscal period’s operational expenses
(7 CFR 924.42).
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2007–2008 fiscal period include $4,800
for the management fee, $1,000 for
Committee travel expenses, $3,000 for
the annual financial audit, and $100 for
compliance. In comparison, budgeted
expenses for the 2006–2007 season were
$4,200, $800, $500, and $100,
respectively. In addition, the Committee
also budgeted an additional $343 this
fiscal period to cover the cost of
insurance, bonds, equipment
maintenance, and other possible
miscellaneous expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected
shipments of Washington-Oregon
prunes. Applying the $1.00 per ton
assessment rate to the Committee’s
4,400 ton crop estimate should provide
$4,400 in assessment income. This
assessment income in addition to
approximately $4,643 from the
Committee’s reserve would be adequate
to cover the recommended $9,043
budget for the 2007–2008 fiscal period.
As of March 31, 2007, there was $8,815
in the Committee’s reserve. The
assessment rate established with this
rule will continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although the assessment rate is
effective for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA would evaluate the Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2007–2008 budget and
those for subsequent fiscal periods will
be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Jul 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 215
producers of fresh prunes in the
regulated production area and
approximately 10 handlers subject to
regulation under the order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,500,000.
Based on information compiled by
both the Committee and the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, the
average annual revenue from the sale of
fresh prunes was approximately $8,440
per producer in 2006. This estimate is
based on 215 producers with a total
utilized production of 5,200 tons selling
for an average of $349 per ton. In
addition, based on Committee records
and 2006 f.o.b. prices ranging from
$14.00 to $16.50 per 30-pound container
as reported by AMS Market News
Service, the entire Washington-Oregon
fresh prune industry handled less than
$6,500,000 worth of prunes last season.
In view of the foregoing, the majority of
Washington-Oregon fresh prune
producers and handlers may be
classified as small entities.
This rule decreases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2007–
2008 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$1.75 to $1.00 per ton. The Committee
unanimously recommended 2007–2008
expenditures of $9,043 and the $1.00
per ton assessment rate at the May 29,
2007 meeting. The assessment rate of
$1.00 is $0.75 lower than the rate in
effect since the 2004–2005 fiscal period.
With an estimated 2007–2008 prune
crop of 4,400 tons, income from the
$1.00 assessment combined with funds
from the Committee’s monetary reserve
should be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses. The Committee recommended
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the lower assessment rate to help
decrease the monetary reserve. Funds in
the reserve ($8,815 as of March 31,
2007) will be kept within the maximum
permitted by the order of approximately
one fiscal period’s operational expenses
(§ 924.42).
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2007–2008 fiscal period include $4,800
for the management fee, $1,000 for
Committee travel expenses, $3,000 for
the annual financial audit, and $100 for
compliance.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this rule, including alternative
expenditure levels. Higher assessment
rates were considered, but not
recommended because of the potential
of generating too much income and thus
maintaining the reserve fund at an
amount higher than program
requirements allow.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming crop year indicates that
the producer price for the 2007–2008
season could average about $325 per
ton. Therefore, the estimated assessment
revenue for the 2007–2008 fiscal period
as a percentage of total producer
revenue could approximate 0.31
percent.
This action decreases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers. In addition,
the Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the WashingtonOregon fresh prune industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend and participate in the
Committee’s deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the May
29, 2007 meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large WashingtonOregon fresh prune handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
Furthermore, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM
13JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 134 / Friday, July 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ama.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect, and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2007–2008 fiscal
period began on April 1, and the
marketing order requires that the rate of
assessment for each fiscal period apply
to all assessable Washington-Oregon
fresh prunes handled during such fiscal
period; (2) this action decreases the
assessment rate for assessable prunes
beginning with the 2007–2008 fiscal
period; (3) handlers are aware of this
action, which was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
years; and (4) this interim final rule
provides a 60-day comment period, and
all comments timely received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 924
Plums, Prunes, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 924 is amended as
follows:
PART 924—FRESH PRUNES GROWN
IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON AND IN UMATILLA
COUNTY, OREGON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 924 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Jul 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
2. Section 924.236 is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 924.236
Assessment rate.
On or after April 1, 2007, an
assessment rate of $1.00 per ton is
established for the Washington-Oregon
Fresh Prune Marketing Committee.
Dated: July 9, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–13583 Filed 7–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 928
Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0024; FV02–928–3
FR]
Papayas Grown in Hawaii; Termination
of Marketing Order 928 and
Implementing Rules and Regulations
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule, termination order.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule terminates the
Federal marketing order (order) for
papayas grown in Hawaii, and the rules
and regulations established under the
order. The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) previously determined the
order should be terminated due to the
results of a referendum in which
growers indicated a lack of support for
the continuation of the order. However,
USDA postponed the termination until
licensing agreements regarding
development and use of transgenic
papaya varieties could be resolved.
Sufficient time has elapsed for the
industry to resolve any outstanding
licensing issues. Therefore, USDA is
proceeding with the termination of the
order.
DATES: Effective Date: July 16, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marc McFetridge, Marketing Specialist,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Ave.,
SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250–
0237; telephone (202) 720–1509, Fax
(202) 720–8938; or
Marc.McFetridge@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38465
DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or e-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This
action is being taken pursuant to
§ 608c(16)(A) of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act,’’ and § 928.64 of
the order.
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule terminates the marketing
order for papayas grown in Hawaii and
the rules and regulations issued
thereunder. The order provides the
authority to regulate the handling of
papayas grown in Hawaii and was
administered locally by the Papaya
Administrative Committee (PAC).
The order has been in effect since
1971. The order authorizes the
establishment of grade, size, quality,
pack, and container requirements. The
order also authorizes production and
marketing research, market
development, and paid advertising for
Hawaii papayas. The program was
funded by assessments imposed on
papaya handlers.
Section 928.64(e) of the order
specifies that continuance referenda
must be conducted among papaya
producers every sixth year before
October 1. In accordance with this
section, USDA conducted a referendum
among papaya growers during the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM
13JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 134 (Friday, July 13, 2007)]
[RUL]
[Pages 38463-38465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13583]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 134 / Friday, July 13, 2007 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 38463]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 924
[Docket No. AMS-FV-07-0087; FV07-924-1 IFR]
Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated Counties in Washington and in
Umatilla County, Oregon; Decreased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the
Washington-Oregon Fresh Prune Marketing Committee (Committee) for the
2007-2008 and subsequent fiscal periods from $1.75 to $1.00 per ton of
prunes handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing order,
which regulates the handling of fresh prunes grown in designated
counties in Washington and in Umatilla County, Oregon. Assessments upon
fresh prune handlers are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and
necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal period began April 1 and
ends March 31. The assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective July 16, 2007. Comments received by September 11,
2007, will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the docket number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will
be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
suite 385, Portland, OR 97204; telephone: (503) 326-2724; Fax: (503)
326-7440; or E-mail: Robert.Curry@usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202) 720-2491; Fax:
(202) 720-8938; or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 924 (7 CFR part 924), regulating the handling
of fresh prunes grown in designated counties in Washington and in
Umatilla County, Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The
order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, Washington-
Oregon prune handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer
the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable
prunes beginning April 1, 2007, and continue until amended, suspended,
or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2007-2008 and subsequent fiscal periods from $1.75 to
$1.00 per ton of prunes handled.
The order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval
of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the
Committee are producers and handlers in designated counties in
Washington and in Umatilla County, Oregon. They are familiar with the
Committee's needs and with the costs for goods and services in their
local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate was formulated and
discussed at a public meeting, thus all directly affected persons had
an opportunity to participate and provide input.
For the 2004-2005 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $1.75 per ton of
fresh prunes handled. This assessment rate continues in effect from
fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the
Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 29, 2007, and unanimously recommended
2007-2008 expenditures of $9,043 and a decreased assessment rate of
$1.00 per ton. In comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures were
$5,600. The assessment rate of $1.00 is $0.75 lower than the rate in
effect since the 2004-
[[Page 38464]]
2005 fiscal period. The Committee recommended the assessment rate
change for the purpose of lowering its monetary reserve to a level
commensurate with the maximum permitted by the order of approximately
one fiscal period's operational expenses (7 CFR 924.42).
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2007-
2008 fiscal period include $4,800 for the management fee, $1,000 for
Committee travel expenses, $3,000 for the annual financial audit, and
$100 for compliance. In comparison, budgeted expenses for the 2006-2007
season were $4,200, $800, $500, and $100, respectively. In addition,
the Committee also budgeted an additional $343 this fiscal period to
cover the cost of insurance, bonds, equipment maintenance, and other
possible miscellaneous expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by
dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of Washington-
Oregon prunes. Applying the $1.00 per ton assessment rate to the
Committee's 4,400 ton crop estimate should provide $4,400 in assessment
income. This assessment income in addition to approximately $4,643 from
the Committee's reserve would be adequate to cover the recommended
$9,043 budget for the 2007-2008 fiscal period. As of March 31, 2007,
there was $8,815 in the Committee's reserve. The assessment rate
established with this rule will continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Committee or other available information.
Although the assessment rate is effective for an indefinite period,
the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal
period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations
for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of
Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA. Committee
meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express
their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate the Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2007-2008 budget and those
for subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 215 producers of fresh prunes in the
regulated production area and approximately 10 handlers subject to
regulation under the order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$6,500,000.
Based on information compiled by both the Committee and the
National Agricultural Statistics Service, the average annual revenue
from the sale of fresh prunes was approximately $8,440 per producer in
2006. This estimate is based on 215 producers with a total utilized
production of 5,200 tons selling for an average of $349 per ton. In
addition, based on Committee records and 2006 f.o.b. prices ranging
from $14.00 to $16.50 per 30-pound container as reported by AMS Market
News Service, the entire Washington-Oregon fresh prune industry handled
less than $6,500,000 worth of prunes last season. In view of the
foregoing, the majority of Washington-Oregon fresh prune producers and
handlers may be classified as small entities.
This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2007-2008 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $1.75 to $1.00 per ton. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2007-2008 expenditures of $9,043 and the $1.00 per ton
assessment rate at the May 29, 2007 meeting. The assessment rate of
$1.00 is $0.75 lower than the rate in effect since the 2004-2005 fiscal
period. With an estimated 2007-2008 prune crop of 4,400 tons, income
from the $1.00 assessment combined with funds from the Committee's
monetary reserve should be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. The
Committee recommended the lower assessment rate to help decrease the
monetary reserve. Funds in the reserve ($8,815 as of March 31, 2007)
will be kept within the maximum permitted by the order of approximately
one fiscal period's operational expenses (Sec. 924.42).
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2007-
2008 fiscal period include $4,800 for the management fee, $1,000 for
Committee travel expenses, $3,000 for the annual financial audit, and
$100 for compliance.
The Committee discussed alternatives to this rule, including
alternative expenditure levels. Higher assessment rates were
considered, but not recommended because of the potential of generating
too much income and thus maintaining the reserve fund at an amount
higher than program requirements allow.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to the upcoming crop year indicates that the producer price
for the 2007-2008 season could average about $325 per ton. Therefore,
the estimated assessment revenue for the 2007-2008 fiscal period as a
percentage of total producer revenue could approximate 0.31 percent.
This action decreases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some
of the costs may be passed on to producers. However, decreasing the
assessment rate reduces the burden on handlers, and may reduce the
burden on producers. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Washington-Oregon fresh prune industry and
all interested persons were invited to attend and participate in the
Committee's deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings,
the May 29, 2007 meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally,
interested persons are invited to submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large Washington-Oregon fresh prune
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. Furthermore, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this rule.
[[Page 38465]]
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ama.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect, and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register because: (1) The 2007-2008 fiscal period began on April 1, and
the marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each
fiscal period apply to all assessable Washington-Oregon fresh prunes
handled during such fiscal period; (2) this action decreases the
assessment rate for assessable prunes beginning with the 2007-2008
fiscal period; (3) handlers are aware of this action, which was
unanimously recommended by the Committee at a public meeting and is
similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past years; and (4)
this interim final rule provides a 60-day comment period, and all
comments timely received will be considered prior to finalization of
this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 924
Plums, Prunes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 924 is amended as
follows:
PART 924--FRESH PRUNES GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
AND IN UMATILLA COUNTY, OREGON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 924 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 924.236 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 924.236 Assessment rate.
On or after April 1, 2007, an assessment rate of $1.00 per ton is
established for the Washington-Oregon Fresh Prune Marketing Committee.
Dated: July 9, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E7-13583 Filed 7-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P