Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge in Tyrrell, Washington, and Hyde Counties, NC, 38097-38098 [E7-13563]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Notices
Number of annual
respondents
Activity
Number of annual
responses
Completion time
per response
38097
Annual burden
hours
R7–50 (walrus) ........................................................................
R7–51 (polar bear) ..................................................................
R7–52 (sea otter) .....................................................................
1,190
52
796
1,190
52
796
15 minutes .......
15 minutes .......
15 minues ........
298
13
199
Totals ................................................................................
2,038
2,038
.....................
510
III. Request for Comments
We invite comments concerning this
IC on:
(1) whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
(3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include and/or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this IC. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: June 25, 2007
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Fish and Wildlife Service.
FR Doc. E7–13469 Filed 7–11–07; 08:45 am
Billing Code 4310–55–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment for
Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife
Refuge in Tyrrell, Washington, and
Hyde Counties, NC
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service, announce that a Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment (Draft CCP/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Jul 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
EA) for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife
Refuge is available for distribution. The
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, requires that
we develop a comprehensive
conservation plan for each national
wildlife refuge. This Draft CCP, when
final, will describe how we intend to
manage Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife
Refuge over the next 15 years.
DATES: Written comments must be
received at the postal address listed
below no later than August 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To provide written
comments or to obtain a copy of the
Draft CCP/EA, please write to: Howard
Phillips, Refuge Manager, Pocosin Lakes
National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 329,
Columbia, North Carolina 27925; or
telephone: 252/796–3004, Extension
226. The Draft CCP/EA may also be
accessed and downloaded from the
Service’s Internet Site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Availability of Comments:
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Background: Congress established the
12,000-acre Pungo National Wildlife
Refuge in 1963, by the authority of the
Migratory Bird Conservation Act of 1929
and the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956.
Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge
was established in 1990. At that time,
Pungo Refuge was made a unit of
Pocosin Lakes Refuge. The refuge, in
northeast North Carolina, consists of
110,106 acres in fee simple ownership,
and is made up of the following
habitats: 63,896 acres of pocosin
wetlands; 4,280 acres of bay forest;
3,124 acres of peatland Atlantic white
cedar; 13,649 acres of mixed pine
flatwoods; 14,045 acres of hardwood
swamp forest; 970 acres of cypress-gum
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
swamp; 987 acres of marsh; 276 acres of
xeric sandhill scrub; 1,250 acres of
cropland; 443 acres of moist-soil areas;
446 acres of natural shoreline; and 6,740
acres of open water. These habitats
support a variety of wildlife species,
including red wolves, red-cockaded
woodpeckers, waterfowl, shorebirds,
wading birds, marsh birds, and
neotropical migratory songbirds.
The refuge hosts approximately
80,000 visitors annually who participate
in hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
wildlife photography, and
environmental education and
interpretation. Because of the estimated
number of people stopping at the Tyrrell
County Visitor Center (460,000), which
is located immediately adjacent to the
refuge’s visitor center and Scuppernong
River Interpretive Boardwalk, actual
refuge visitation is likely much higher;
perhaps exceeding 200,000.
Significant issues addressed in the
Draft CCP/EA include: managing
impoundments to create optimum
habitat for migrating waterfowl,
shorebirds, wading birds, and aquatic
organisms; managing and providing
optimum habitat for threatened and
endangered species; managing marshes
and pine forests with prescribed fire;
monitoring, managing, and eradicating
invasive pest plants and animals;
restoring natural hydrology on the
refuge; surveying for waterfowl,
shorebirds, wading birds, and
neotropical migratory songbirds;
providing adequate law enforcement;
providing outreach and interpretive
opportunities to the public; providing
quality hunting and fishing
opportunities; and managing access for
public use activities.
Also addressed in the Draft CCP/EA
are compatibility determinations for the
following uses: (1) Hunting; (2) Fishing;
(3) Wildlife Observation and
Photography; (4) Environmental
Education and Interpretation; (5) Refuge
Access for Public Uses; (6) Trapping of
Selected Furbearers for Management; (7)
Collecting Reptiles and Amphibians; (8)
Refuge Resource Research Studies; (9)
Cooperative Farming; (10) Commercial
Photography; (11) Commercial Tours
and Guiding; (12) Wood and Reed
Gathering; (13) Meetings of Non-Service
Agencies and Organizations on the
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
38098
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Notices
Refuge; and (14) Group All-Terrain
Vehicle Ride on Northwest Fork Road
All-Terrain Vehicle Trail.
Alternatives: We developed four
alternatives for management of the
refuge and chose Alternative 2 as the
proposed action. We believe this
alternative will be the most effective one
to contribute to the purposes for which
the refuge was established and to the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System.
Alternative 1, also called the ‘‘No
Action’’ alternative, is the baseline or
status quo of refuge programs and is
usually a continuation of current
planning objectives and management
strategies. The refuge currently manages
its impoundments very intensively by
controlling water levels and vegetation
to create optimum habitat for migrating
waterfowl. It also manages pine forests
and marshes with prescribed fire.
Waterfowl are surveyed on a routine
basis. The refuge has a visitor center,
which includes an auditorium and
indoor and outdoor classrooms, but
depends on volunteers and cooperating
agency personnel to staff and maintain
the center. With regard to public use,
each of the six priority public uses (e.g.,
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
wildlife photography, and
environmental education and
interpretation) is encouraged. The staff
conducts a limited number of
environmental education and
interpretation programs.
When the planning process started,
there were 7.5 full-time employees
stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge
dedicated to refuge management (two of
those positions have been lost recently)
and 7.5 full-time employees dedicated
to fire management.
Alternative 2, the proposed action,
would allow for moderate program
increases to address refuge priorities.
The refuge would manage its
impoundments very intensively by
controlling water levels and vegetation
to create optimum habitat for migrating
waterfowl. It would also manage pine
forests and marshes with prescribed fire
and would manage the vegetative
composition of habitats in selected
areas. Waterfowl would be surveyed on
a routine basis. The staff would develop
inventory plans for all species and
implement them in selected habitats.
The staff would develop and implement
a black bear management plan. The staff
would maintain the visitor center with
volunteers and cooperating agency
personnel supplementing refuge
personnel.
There would be 17.5 staff members
dedicated to refuge management and 7.5
staff members dedicated to fire
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Jul 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
management. The volunteer program
would be expanded to recruit volunteers
to contribute 4,000 hours of service.
The six priority public uses would be
allowed and the staff would conduct
environmental education and
interpretation programs to meet local
needs.
Alternative 3 would allow for
substantial program increases. The
refuge would manage its impoundments
very intensively by controlling water
levels and vegetation to create optimum
habitat for migrating waterfowl. It
would also manage pine forests and
marshes with prescribed fire and would
manage the vegetative composition of
habitats on the entire refuge. Waterfowl
would be surveyed on a routine basis.
The staff would develop inventory plans
for all species and implement them over
the entire refuge. The staff would
develop and implement a black bear
management plan. The staff would
maintain the visitor center with
volunteers and cooperating agency
personnel supplementing refuge
personnel.
There would be 25 staff members
stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge
dedicated to refuge management and 7
staff members dedicated to fire
management. The refuge would conduct
forest management and hydrology
restoration by contract. The volunteer
program would be expanded to recruit
volunteers to contribute 10,000 hours of
service.
The six priority public uses would be
allowed and the staff would conduct
environmental education and
interpretation programs to meet local
needs and expand outreach to the
communities.
Alternative 4 would maintain the
refuge in caretaker status. The refuge
would manage its impoundments very
intensively by controlling water levels
and vegetation to create optimum
habitat for migrating waterfowl. It
would manage pine forests and marshes
with prescribed fire. Waterfowl would
be surveyed on a routine basis.
Cooperating agency personnel and
volunteers would staff and maintain the
visitor center.
There would be 4.5 staff members
stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge
dedicated to refuge management and 7.5
staff members dedicated to fire
management.
The six priority public uses would be
allowed; however, the staff would not
conduct any environmental education
and interpretation programs.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: May 25, 2007.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E7–13563 Filed 7–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Habitat Conservation Plan for the Kern
County Valley Floor, Kern County, CA
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and notice of public meetings.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service),
advises the public that we intend to
gather information necessary to prepare,
in coordination with the California
Department of Fish and Game (DFG),
California Energy Commission, the
California Department of Conservation
Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal
Resources, and the County of Kern, a
joint Environmental Impact Report/
Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/
EIS) on the Kern County Valley Floor
Habitat Conservation Plan (VFHCP)
Project. The VFHCP is being prepared
under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Federal
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). The County of Kern
intends to apply for a 30-year incidental
take permit from the Service. The
permit is needed to authorize the
incidental take of threatened and
endangered species that could occur as
a result of public and private
development.
The Service provides this notice to (1)
Describe the proposed action and
possible alternatives; (2) advise other
Federal and State agencies, affected
Tribes, and the public of our intent to
prepare an EIR/EIS; (3) announce the
initiation of a public scoping period;
and (4) obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues to be
included in the EIR/EIS.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before August 13, 2007.
The public meeting will be held on
Wednesday, July 25, 2007, from 4 p.m.
to 6 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at the following location:
Wednesday, July 25, 2007, at the First
Floor Public Meeting Room, Kern
County Public Services Building, 2700
M Street, Bakersfield, California 93301.
Written comments submitted to Lori
Rinek, Chief, Conservation Planning and
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 133 (Thursday, July 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38097-38098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13563]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife
Refuge in Tyrrell, Washington, and Hyde Counties, NC
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service, announce that a Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment (Draft
CCP/EA) for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge is available for
distribution. The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act
of 1997, requires that we develop a comprehensive conservation plan for
each national wildlife refuge. This Draft CCP, when final, will
describe how we intend to manage Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge
over the next 15 years.
DATES: Written comments must be received at the postal address listed
below no later than August 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To provide written comments or to obtain a copy of the Draft
CCP/EA, please write to: Howard Phillips, Refuge Manager, Pocosin Lakes
National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 329, Columbia, North Carolina 27925;
or telephone: 252/796-3004, Extension 226. The Draft CCP/EA may also be
accessed and downloaded from the Service's Internet Site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Availability of Comments: Before including your address,
phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information
in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment,
including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly
available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold
your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Background: Congress established the 12,000-acre Pungo National
Wildlife Refuge in 1963, by the authority of the Migratory Bird
Conservation Act of 1929 and the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956. Pocosin
Lakes National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1990. At that time,
Pungo Refuge was made a unit of Pocosin Lakes Refuge. The refuge, in
northeast North Carolina, consists of 110,106 acres in fee simple
ownership, and is made up of the following habitats: 63,896 acres of
pocosin wetlands; 4,280 acres of bay forest; 3,124 acres of peatland
Atlantic white cedar; 13,649 acres of mixed pine flatwoods; 14,045
acres of hardwood swamp forest; 970 acres of cypress-gum swamp; 987
acres of marsh; 276 acres of xeric sandhill scrub; 1,250 acres of
cropland; 443 acres of moist-soil areas; 446 acres of natural
shoreline; and 6,740 acres of open water. These habitats support a
variety of wildlife species, including red wolves, red-cockaded
woodpeckers, waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, marsh birds, and
neotropical migratory songbirds.
The refuge hosts approximately 80,000 visitors annually who
participate in hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. Because of
the estimated number of people stopping at the Tyrrell County Visitor
Center (460,000), which is located immediately adjacent to the refuge's
visitor center and Scuppernong River Interpretive Boardwalk, actual
refuge visitation is likely much higher; perhaps exceeding 200,000.
Significant issues addressed in the Draft CCP/EA include: managing
impoundments to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl,
shorebirds, wading birds, and aquatic organisms; managing and providing
optimum habitat for threatened and endangered species; managing marshes
and pine forests with prescribed fire; monitoring, managing, and
eradicating invasive pest plants and animals; restoring natural
hydrology on the refuge; surveying for waterfowl, shorebirds, wading
birds, and neotropical migratory songbirds; providing adequate law
enforcement; providing outreach and interpretive opportunities to the
public; providing quality hunting and fishing opportunities; and
managing access for public use activities.
Also addressed in the Draft CCP/EA are compatibility determinations
for the following uses: (1) Hunting; (2) Fishing; (3) Wildlife
Observation and Photography; (4) Environmental Education and
Interpretation; (5) Refuge Access for Public Uses; (6) Trapping of
Selected Furbearers for Management; (7) Collecting Reptiles and
Amphibians; (8) Refuge Resource Research Studies; (9) Cooperative
Farming; (10) Commercial Photography; (11) Commercial Tours and
Guiding; (12) Wood and Reed Gathering; (13) Meetings of Non-Service
Agencies and Organizations on the
[[Page 38098]]
Refuge; and (14) Group All-Terrain Vehicle Ride on Northwest Fork Road
All-Terrain Vehicle Trail.
Alternatives: We developed four alternatives for management of the
refuge and chose Alternative 2 as the proposed action. We believe this
alternative will be the most effective one to contribute to the
purposes for which the refuge was established and to the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System.
Alternative 1, also called the ``No Action'' alternative, is the
baseline or status quo of refuge programs and is usually a continuation
of current planning objectives and management strategies. The refuge
currently manages its impoundments very intensively by controlling
water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating
waterfowl. It also manages pine forests and marshes with prescribed
fire. Waterfowl are surveyed on a routine basis. The refuge has a
visitor center, which includes an auditorium and indoor and outdoor
classrooms, but depends on volunteers and cooperating agency personnel
to staff and maintain the center. With regard to public use, each of
the six priority public uses (e.g., hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and
interpretation) is encouraged. The staff conducts a limited number of
environmental education and interpretation programs.
When the planning process started, there were 7.5 full-time
employees stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge dedicated to refuge
management (two of those positions have been lost recently) and 7.5
full-time employees dedicated to fire management.
Alternative 2, the proposed action, would allow for moderate
program increases to address refuge priorities. The refuge would manage
its impoundments very intensively by controlling water levels and
vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl. It would
also manage pine forests and marshes with prescribed fire and would
manage the vegetative composition of habitats in selected areas.
Waterfowl would be surveyed on a routine basis. The staff would develop
inventory plans for all species and implement them in selected
habitats. The staff would develop and implement a black bear management
plan. The staff would maintain the visitor center with volunteers and
cooperating agency personnel supplementing refuge personnel.
There would be 17.5 staff members dedicated to refuge management
and 7.5 staff members dedicated to fire management. The volunteer
program would be expanded to recruit volunteers to contribute 4,000
hours of service.
The six priority public uses would be allowed and the staff would
conduct environmental education and interpretation programs to meet
local needs.
Alternative 3 would allow for substantial program increases. The
refuge would manage its impoundments very intensively by controlling
water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating
waterfowl. It would also manage pine forests and marshes with
prescribed fire and would manage the vegetative composition of habitats
on the entire refuge. Waterfowl would be surveyed on a routine basis.
The staff would develop inventory plans for all species and implement
them over the entire refuge. The staff would develop and implement a
black bear management plan. The staff would maintain the visitor center
with volunteers and cooperating agency personnel supplementing refuge
personnel.
There would be 25 staff members stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge
dedicated to refuge management and 7 staff members dedicated to fire
management. The refuge would conduct forest management and hydrology
restoration by contract. The volunteer program would be expanded to
recruit volunteers to contribute 10,000 hours of service.
The six priority public uses would be allowed and the staff would
conduct environmental education and interpretation programs to meet
local needs and expand outreach to the communities.
Alternative 4 would maintain the refuge in caretaker status. The
refuge would manage its impoundments very intensively by controlling
water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating
waterfowl. It would manage pine forests and marshes with prescribed
fire. Waterfowl would be surveyed on a routine basis. Cooperating
agency personnel and volunteers would staff and maintain the visitor
center.
There would be 4.5 staff members stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge
dedicated to refuge management and 7.5 staff members dedicated to fire
management.
The six priority public uses would be allowed; however, the staff
would not conduct any environmental education and interpretation
programs.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law
105-57.
Dated: May 25, 2007.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E7-13563 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P