Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge in Tyrrell, Washington, and Hyde Counties, NC, 38097-38098 [E7-13563]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Notices Number of annual respondents Activity Number of annual responses Completion time per response 38097 Annual burden hours R7–50 (walrus) ........................................................................ R7–51 (polar bear) .................................................................. R7–52 (sea otter) ..................................................................... 1,190 52 796 1,190 52 796 15 minutes ....... 15 minutes ....... 15 minues ........ 298 13 199 Totals ................................................................................ 2,038 2,038 ..................... 510 III. Request for Comments We invite comments concerning this IC on: (1) whether or not the collection of information is necessary, including whether or not the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents. Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. We will include and/or summarize each comment in our request to OMB to approve this IC. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: June 25, 2007 Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service. FR Doc. E7–13469 Filed 7–11–07; 08:45 am Billing Code 4310–55–S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge in Tyrrell, Washington, and Hyde Counties, NC Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service, announce that a Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment (Draft CCP/ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:42 Jul 11, 2007 Jkt 211001 EA) for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge is available for distribution. The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires that we develop a comprehensive conservation plan for each national wildlife refuge. This Draft CCP, when final, will describe how we intend to manage Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge over the next 15 years. DATES: Written comments must be received at the postal address listed below no later than August 13, 2007. ADDRESSES: To provide written comments or to obtain a copy of the Draft CCP/EA, please write to: Howard Phillips, Refuge Manager, Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 329, Columbia, North Carolina 27925; or telephone: 252/796–3004, Extension 226. The Draft CCP/EA may also be accessed and downloaded from the Service’s Internet Site: https:// southeast.fws.gov/planning/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Availability of Comments: Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Background: Congress established the 12,000-acre Pungo National Wildlife Refuge in 1963, by the authority of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act of 1929 and the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956. Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1990. At that time, Pungo Refuge was made a unit of Pocosin Lakes Refuge. The refuge, in northeast North Carolina, consists of 110,106 acres in fee simple ownership, and is made up of the following habitats: 63,896 acres of pocosin wetlands; 4,280 acres of bay forest; 3,124 acres of peatland Atlantic white cedar; 13,649 acres of mixed pine flatwoods; 14,045 acres of hardwood swamp forest; 970 acres of cypress-gum PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 swamp; 987 acres of marsh; 276 acres of xeric sandhill scrub; 1,250 acres of cropland; 443 acres of moist-soil areas; 446 acres of natural shoreline; and 6,740 acres of open water. These habitats support a variety of wildlife species, including red wolves, red-cockaded woodpeckers, waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, marsh birds, and neotropical migratory songbirds. The refuge hosts approximately 80,000 visitors annually who participate in hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and interpretation. Because of the estimated number of people stopping at the Tyrrell County Visitor Center (460,000), which is located immediately adjacent to the refuge’s visitor center and Scuppernong River Interpretive Boardwalk, actual refuge visitation is likely much higher; perhaps exceeding 200,000. Significant issues addressed in the Draft CCP/EA include: managing impoundments to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, and aquatic organisms; managing and providing optimum habitat for threatened and endangered species; managing marshes and pine forests with prescribed fire; monitoring, managing, and eradicating invasive pest plants and animals; restoring natural hydrology on the refuge; surveying for waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, and neotropical migratory songbirds; providing adequate law enforcement; providing outreach and interpretive opportunities to the public; providing quality hunting and fishing opportunities; and managing access for public use activities. Also addressed in the Draft CCP/EA are compatibility determinations for the following uses: (1) Hunting; (2) Fishing; (3) Wildlife Observation and Photography; (4) Environmental Education and Interpretation; (5) Refuge Access for Public Uses; (6) Trapping of Selected Furbearers for Management; (7) Collecting Reptiles and Amphibians; (8) Refuge Resource Research Studies; (9) Cooperative Farming; (10) Commercial Photography; (11) Commercial Tours and Guiding; (12) Wood and Reed Gathering; (13) Meetings of Non-Service Agencies and Organizations on the E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES 38098 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Notices Refuge; and (14) Group All-Terrain Vehicle Ride on Northwest Fork Road All-Terrain Vehicle Trail. Alternatives: We developed four alternatives for management of the refuge and chose Alternative 2 as the proposed action. We believe this alternative will be the most effective one to contribute to the purposes for which the refuge was established and to the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System. Alternative 1, also called the ‘‘No Action’’ alternative, is the baseline or status quo of refuge programs and is usually a continuation of current planning objectives and management strategies. The refuge currently manages its impoundments very intensively by controlling water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl. It also manages pine forests and marshes with prescribed fire. Waterfowl are surveyed on a routine basis. The refuge has a visitor center, which includes an auditorium and indoor and outdoor classrooms, but depends on volunteers and cooperating agency personnel to staff and maintain the center. With regard to public use, each of the six priority public uses (e.g., hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and interpretation) is encouraged. The staff conducts a limited number of environmental education and interpretation programs. When the planning process started, there were 7.5 full-time employees stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge dedicated to refuge management (two of those positions have been lost recently) and 7.5 full-time employees dedicated to fire management. Alternative 2, the proposed action, would allow for moderate program increases to address refuge priorities. The refuge would manage its impoundments very intensively by controlling water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl. It would also manage pine forests and marshes with prescribed fire and would manage the vegetative composition of habitats in selected areas. Waterfowl would be surveyed on a routine basis. The staff would develop inventory plans for all species and implement them in selected habitats. The staff would develop and implement a black bear management plan. The staff would maintain the visitor center with volunteers and cooperating agency personnel supplementing refuge personnel. There would be 17.5 staff members dedicated to refuge management and 7.5 staff members dedicated to fire VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:42 Jul 11, 2007 Jkt 211001 management. The volunteer program would be expanded to recruit volunteers to contribute 4,000 hours of service. The six priority public uses would be allowed and the staff would conduct environmental education and interpretation programs to meet local needs. Alternative 3 would allow for substantial program increases. The refuge would manage its impoundments very intensively by controlling water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl. It would also manage pine forests and marshes with prescribed fire and would manage the vegetative composition of habitats on the entire refuge. Waterfowl would be surveyed on a routine basis. The staff would develop inventory plans for all species and implement them over the entire refuge. The staff would develop and implement a black bear management plan. The staff would maintain the visitor center with volunteers and cooperating agency personnel supplementing refuge personnel. There would be 25 staff members stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge dedicated to refuge management and 7 staff members dedicated to fire management. The refuge would conduct forest management and hydrology restoration by contract. The volunteer program would be expanded to recruit volunteers to contribute 10,000 hours of service. The six priority public uses would be allowed and the staff would conduct environmental education and interpretation programs to meet local needs and expand outreach to the communities. Alternative 4 would maintain the refuge in caretaker status. The refuge would manage its impoundments very intensively by controlling water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl. It would manage pine forests and marshes with prescribed fire. Waterfowl would be surveyed on a routine basis. Cooperating agency personnel and volunteers would staff and maintain the visitor center. There would be 4.5 staff members stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge dedicated to refuge management and 7.5 staff members dedicated to fire management. The six priority public uses would be allowed; however, the staff would not conduct any environmental education and interpretation programs. Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law 105–57. PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: May 25, 2007. Cynthia K. Dohner, Acting Regional Director. [FR Doc. E7–13563 Filed 7–11–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Habitat Conservation Plan for the Kern County Valley Floor, Kern County, CA Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and notice of public meetings. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), advises the public that we intend to gather information necessary to prepare, in coordination with the California Department of Fish and Game (DFG), California Energy Commission, the California Department of Conservation Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources, and the County of Kern, a joint Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/ EIS) on the Kern County Valley Floor Habitat Conservation Plan (VFHCP) Project. The VFHCP is being prepared under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The County of Kern intends to apply for a 30-year incidental take permit from the Service. The permit is needed to authorize the incidental take of threatened and endangered species that could occur as a result of public and private development. The Service provides this notice to (1) Describe the proposed action and possible alternatives; (2) advise other Federal and State agencies, affected Tribes, and the public of our intent to prepare an EIR/EIS; (3) announce the initiation of a public scoping period; and (4) obtain suggestions and information on the scope of issues to be included in the EIR/EIS. DATES: Written comments should be received on or before August 13, 2007. The public meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 25, 2007, from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the following location: Wednesday, July 25, 2007, at the First Floor Public Meeting Room, Kern County Public Services Building, 2700 M Street, Bakersfield, California 93301. Written comments submitted to Lori Rinek, Chief, Conservation Planning and E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 133 (Thursday, July 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38097-38098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13563]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation 
Plan and Environmental Assessment for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife 
Refuge in Tyrrell, Washington, and Hyde Counties, NC

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service, announce that a Draft 
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment (Draft 
CCP/EA) for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge is available for 
distribution. The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 
1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act 
of 1997, requires that we develop a comprehensive conservation plan for 
each national wildlife refuge. This Draft CCP, when final, will 
describe how we intend to manage Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge 
over the next 15 years.

DATES: Written comments must be received at the postal address listed 
below no later than August 13, 2007.

ADDRESSES: To provide written comments or to obtain a copy of the Draft 
CCP/EA, please write to: Howard Phillips, Refuge Manager, Pocosin Lakes 
National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 329, Columbia, North Carolina 27925; 
or telephone: 252/796-3004, Extension 226. The Draft CCP/EA may also be 
accessed and downloaded from the Service's Internet Site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Availability of Comments: Before including your address, 
phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information 
in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment, 
including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly 
available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold 
your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot 
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
    Background: Congress established the 12,000-acre Pungo National 
Wildlife Refuge in 1963, by the authority of the Migratory Bird 
Conservation Act of 1929 and the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956. Pocosin 
Lakes National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1990. At that time, 
Pungo Refuge was made a unit of Pocosin Lakes Refuge. The refuge, in 
northeast North Carolina, consists of 110,106 acres in fee simple 
ownership, and is made up of the following habitats: 63,896 acres of 
pocosin wetlands; 4,280 acres of bay forest; 3,124 acres of peatland 
Atlantic white cedar; 13,649 acres of mixed pine flatwoods; 14,045 
acres of hardwood swamp forest; 970 acres of cypress-gum swamp; 987 
acres of marsh; 276 acres of xeric sandhill scrub; 1,250 acres of 
cropland; 443 acres of moist-soil areas; 446 acres of natural 
shoreline; and 6,740 acres of open water. These habitats support a 
variety of wildlife species, including red wolves, red-cockaded 
woodpeckers, waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, marsh birds, and 
neotropical migratory songbirds.
    The refuge hosts approximately 80,000 visitors annually who 
participate in hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife 
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. Because of 
the estimated number of people stopping at the Tyrrell County Visitor 
Center (460,000), which is located immediately adjacent to the refuge's 
visitor center and Scuppernong River Interpretive Boardwalk, actual 
refuge visitation is likely much higher; perhaps exceeding 200,000.
    Significant issues addressed in the Draft CCP/EA include: managing 
impoundments to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl, 
shorebirds, wading birds, and aquatic organisms; managing and providing 
optimum habitat for threatened and endangered species; managing marshes 
and pine forests with prescribed fire; monitoring, managing, and 
eradicating invasive pest plants and animals; restoring natural 
hydrology on the refuge; surveying for waterfowl, shorebirds, wading 
birds, and neotropical migratory songbirds; providing adequate law 
enforcement; providing outreach and interpretive opportunities to the 
public; providing quality hunting and fishing opportunities; and 
managing access for public use activities.
    Also addressed in the Draft CCP/EA are compatibility determinations 
for the following uses: (1) Hunting; (2) Fishing; (3) Wildlife 
Observation and Photography; (4) Environmental Education and 
Interpretation; (5) Refuge Access for Public Uses; (6) Trapping of 
Selected Furbearers for Management; (7) Collecting Reptiles and 
Amphibians; (8) Refuge Resource Research Studies; (9) Cooperative 
Farming; (10) Commercial Photography; (11) Commercial Tours and 
Guiding; (12) Wood and Reed Gathering; (13) Meetings of Non-Service 
Agencies and Organizations on the

[[Page 38098]]

Refuge; and (14) Group All-Terrain Vehicle Ride on Northwest Fork Road 
All-Terrain Vehicle Trail.
    Alternatives: We developed four alternatives for management of the 
refuge and chose Alternative 2 as the proposed action. We believe this 
alternative will be the most effective one to contribute to the 
purposes for which the refuge was established and to the mission of the 
National Wildlife Refuge System.
    Alternative 1, also called the ``No Action'' alternative, is the 
baseline or status quo of refuge programs and is usually a continuation 
of current planning objectives and management strategies. The refuge 
currently manages its impoundments very intensively by controlling 
water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating 
waterfowl. It also manages pine forests and marshes with prescribed 
fire. Waterfowl are surveyed on a routine basis. The refuge has a 
visitor center, which includes an auditorium and indoor and outdoor 
classrooms, but depends on volunteers and cooperating agency personnel 
to staff and maintain the center. With regard to public use, each of 
the six priority public uses (e.g., hunting, fishing, wildlife 
observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and 
interpretation) is encouraged. The staff conducts a limited number of 
environmental education and interpretation programs.
    When the planning process started, there were 7.5 full-time 
employees stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge dedicated to refuge 
management (two of those positions have been lost recently) and 7.5 
full-time employees dedicated to fire management.
    Alternative 2, the proposed action, would allow for moderate 
program increases to address refuge priorities. The refuge would manage 
its impoundments very intensively by controlling water levels and 
vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl. It would 
also manage pine forests and marshes with prescribed fire and would 
manage the vegetative composition of habitats in selected areas. 
Waterfowl would be surveyed on a routine basis. The staff would develop 
inventory plans for all species and implement them in selected 
habitats. The staff would develop and implement a black bear management 
plan. The staff would maintain the visitor center with volunteers and 
cooperating agency personnel supplementing refuge personnel.
    There would be 17.5 staff members dedicated to refuge management 
and 7.5 staff members dedicated to fire management. The volunteer 
program would be expanded to recruit volunteers to contribute 4,000 
hours of service.
    The six priority public uses would be allowed and the staff would 
conduct environmental education and interpretation programs to meet 
local needs.
    Alternative 3 would allow for substantial program increases. The 
refuge would manage its impoundments very intensively by controlling 
water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating 
waterfowl. It would also manage pine forests and marshes with 
prescribed fire and would manage the vegetative composition of habitats 
on the entire refuge. Waterfowl would be surveyed on a routine basis. 
The staff would develop inventory plans for all species and implement 
them over the entire refuge. The staff would develop and implement a 
black bear management plan. The staff would maintain the visitor center 
with volunteers and cooperating agency personnel supplementing refuge 
personnel.
    There would be 25 staff members stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge 
dedicated to refuge management and 7 staff members dedicated to fire 
management. The refuge would conduct forest management and hydrology 
restoration by contract. The volunteer program would be expanded to 
recruit volunteers to contribute 10,000 hours of service.
    The six priority public uses would be allowed and the staff would 
conduct environmental education and interpretation programs to meet 
local needs and expand outreach to the communities.
    Alternative 4 would maintain the refuge in caretaker status. The 
refuge would manage its impoundments very intensively by controlling 
water levels and vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating 
waterfowl. It would manage pine forests and marshes with prescribed 
fire. Waterfowl would be surveyed on a routine basis. Cooperating 
agency personnel and volunteers would staff and maintain the visitor 
center.
    There would be 4.5 staff members stationed at Pocosin Lakes Refuge 
dedicated to refuge management and 7.5 staff members dedicated to fire 
management.
    The six priority public uses would be allowed; however, the staff 
would not conduct any environmental education and interpretation 
programs.

    Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the 
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law 
105-57.

    Dated: May 25, 2007.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
 [FR Doc. E7-13563 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.