Provision of Hospital Care and Medical Services During Certain Disasters or Emergencies, 38042-38045 [E7-13278]
Download as PDF
38042
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
(1) Fails to meet and maintain HQ
USAFA/PL educational, military,
character, or physical fitness standards.
(2) Fails to demonstrate adaptability
and suitability for participation in
USAFA educational, military, character,
or physical training programs.
(3) Displays unsatisfactory conduct.
(4) Fails to meet statutory
requirements for admission to the
USAFA, for example:
(i) Marriage or acquiring legal
dependents.
(ii) Medical disqualification.
(iii) Refusal to serve as a
commissioned officer in the U.S. Armed
Forces.
(5) Requests disenrollment.
(b) The HQ USAFA/PL commander
may also disenroll a student when it is
determined that the student’s retention
is not in the best interest of the
Government.
(c) The military personnel flight (10
MSS/DPM) processes Regular Air Force
members for reassignment if:
(1) They are disenrolled from the HQ
USAFA/PL.
(2) They fail to obtain or accept an
appointment to a U.S. Service Academy.
(d) The Air Force reassigns Air Force
Reserve cadet candidates who are
disenrolled from the HQ USAFA/PL or
who fail to obtain or accept an
appointment to an U.S. Service
Academy in either of two ways under
AFI 36–3208:
(1) Discharges them from the United
States Air Force without any further
military obligation if they were called to
active duty solely to attend the HQ
USAFA/PL.
(2) Releases them from active duty
and reassigns them to the Air Force
Reserve Personnel Center if they were
released from Reserve units to attend
the HQ USAFA/PL.
(e) The National Guard (Army or Air
Force) releases cadet candidates from
active duty and reassigns them to their
State Adjutant General.
(f) The Air Force reassigns Regular
and Reserve personnel from other
Services back to their unit of origin to
complete any prior service obligation if:
(1) They are disenrolled from the HQ
USAFA/PL.
(2) They fail to obtain or accept an
appointment to the USAFA.
§ 903.9
forms.
Cadet records and reassignment
(a) Headquarters USAFA Cadet
Personnel (HQ USAFA/DPY) maintains
records of cadet candidates who enter
the USAFA until they are commissioned
or disenrolled.
(b) 10 MSS/DPM will send records of
Regular Air Force personnel who enter
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jul 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
one of the other Service Academies to
HQ Air Force Personnel Center (HQ
AFPC) for processing.
§ 903.10 Information collections, records,
and forms or information management tools
(IMTS).
(a) Information Collections. No
information collections are created by
this publication.
(b) Records. Ensure that all records
created as a result of processes
prescribed in this publication are
maintained in accordance with AFMAN
37–123, Management of Records, and
disposed of in accordance with the Air
Force Records Disposition Schedule
(RDS) located at https://
webrims.amc.af.mil.
(c) Forms or IMTs (Adopted and
Prescribed).
(1) Adopted Forms or IMTs: AF IMT
847, Recommendation for Change of
Publication. AF Form 1288, Application
for Ready Reserve Assignment, AF Form
1786, Application for Appointment to
the USAF Academy Under Quota
Allotted to Enlisted Members of the
Regular and Reserve Components of the
Air Force, DD Form 4, Enlistment/
Reenlistment Document—Armed Forces
of the United States, DD Form 368,
Request for Conditional Release, and DD
Form 1966, Record of Military
Processing—Armed Forces of the United
States.
(2) Prescribed Forms or IMTs: No
forms or IMTs are prescribed by this
publication.
Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of the Air Force.
[FR Doc. E7–13250 Filed 7–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AM40
Provision of Hospital Care and Medical
Services During Certain Disasters or
Emergencies
AGENCY:
Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA).
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to establish
regulations regarding the provision of
hospital care and medical services
under the VA Emergency Preparedness
Act of 2002 to individuals responding
to, involved in, or otherwise affected by
certain disasters or emergencies
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(including individuals who otherwise
do not have VA eligibility for such care
and services).
DATES: Comment Date: Comments must
be received on or before September 10,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to the Director, Regulations
Management (00REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AM40—Provision of Hospital Care and
Medical Services During Certain
Disasters or Emergencies.’’ Copies of
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management,
Room 1063B, between the hours of 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday (except holidays). Please call
(202) 273–9515 for an appointment. In
addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online in
https://www.Regulations.gov through the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tony A. Guagliardo, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office (163),
Veterans Health Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 254–0384. (This is not a
toll free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document proposes to amend the VA
‘‘Medical’’ regulations in 38 CFR part 17
by adding a new § 17.86 and by making
technical amendments in § 17.102. As
indicated in paragraph (a) of proposed
§ 17.86, this proposed rule would
implement the provisions of Public Law
107–287, the VA Emergency
Preparedness Act of 2002, regarding
hospital care and medical services
provided to individuals responding to,
involved in, or otherwise affected by
certain disasters or emergencies
(including individuals who otherwise
do not have VA eligibility for such care
and services). These provisions are
codified as 38 U.S.C. 1785.
Paragraphs (b) and (c) of proposed
§ 17.86 would reflect the provisions of
38 U.S.C. 1785, which provide that
during and immediately following a
disaster or emergency VA may furnish
hospital care and medical services to
individuals (including those who
otherwise do not have VA eligibility for
such care and services) responding to,
involved in, or otherwise affected by:
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
• A major disaster or emergency
declared by the President under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
5121 et seq.) (‘‘Stafford Act’’), or
• A disaster or emergency in which
the National Disaster Medical System
established pursuant to section 2811(b)
of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300hh–11(b)) is activated either
by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under paragraph (3)(A) of that
section or as otherwise authorized by
law.
Paragraph (d) of proposed § 17.86
would define ‘‘hospital care’’ and
‘‘medical services’’ according to the
existing definitions in 38 U.S.C. 1701(5)
and 1701(6).
Under paragraph (e) of proposed
§ 17.86, charges for care and services
furnished to an officer or employee of a
department or agency of the United
States (other than VA) or to a member
of the Armed Forces would be
calculated in accordance with the
provisions of § 17.102(h). Section 1785
states that VA shall be reimbursed for
the cost of any care or services
furnished to an officer or employee of a
department or agency of the United
States (other than VA) or to a member
of the Armed Forces at rates agreed
upon based on the cost of the care or
service provided. An established system
for charging for care and services
provided to beneficiaries of the
Department of Defense or other Federal
agencies is already in place in
§ 17.102(c), (e), and (h). The cost of such
care is charged at rates agreed upon in
a sharing agreement described in
§ 17.102(e), or pursuant to the costbased system described in § 17.102(h).
In accordance with § 17.102(h), which
provides authority to periodically do so,
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and VA have published a
document in the ‘‘Notices’’ section of
the Federal Register entitled ‘‘CostBased and Interagency Billing Rates for
Medical Care or Services Provided by
the Department of Veterans Affairs,’’ 70
FR 66,866—66,868 (November 3, 2005).
If the head of another Federal agency or
the Secretary of a branch of the Armed
Forces seeks VA hospital care or
medical services for an officer,
employee, or member, this cost-based
system is the agreed-upon method for
calculating the cost of such care or
service unless the care provided falls
within an existing sharing agreement as
described in § 17.102(e).
Section 1785 is silent regarding
charges to other individuals (i.e., other
than the Federal officers or employees
or members of the Armed Forces
discussed in the immediately preceding
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jul 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
paragraph of this preamble) that are
eligible for such care and services under
section 1785 but would not otherwise be
eligible for such care and services as VA
beneficiaries. This issue is discussed in
the legislative history of the VA
Emergency Preparedness Act of 2002 in
S. Rep. No. 107–229 (July 31, 2002), a
report of the Senate Committee on
Veterans’ Affairs. The report states, at 9:
‘‘[Section 1785] would also allow VA to
receive reimbursement for the cost of
services provided to employees of other
Federal agencies or departments, to be
credited to the facility that provided
care. VA would not be required to
charge other individuals for emergency
care offered during a disaster.’’ The
language of the statute, when
considered with this legislative history,
suggests that Congress did not intend to
require VA to seek reimbursement for
hospital care or medical services
provided to other individuals during a
covered disaster or emergency.
However, in addition to the statutory
language in section 1785, VA’s current
appropriation act impacts the question
of reimbursement for care provided to
individuals who are not otherwise
eligible for hospital care or medical
services at VA expense.
VA appropriation acts (including the
appropriation act for fiscal year 2006,
Pub. L. 109–114) have historically
included a provision stating (with
certain exceptions) that no appropriated
funds shall be available ‘‘for
hospitalization or examination of any
persons’’ (Pub. L. 109–114, sec. 204)
unless reimbursement for such care is
made to the medical services account at
rates set by the Secretary. In the
appropriation act for fiscal year 2006
there are three exceptions. The first
exception is care provided to
‘‘beneficiaries entitled under the laws
bestowing such benefits to veterans.’’ In
this preamble we use the phrase ‘‘VA
beneficiaries’’ to refer to individuals
eligible for hospitalization and medical
care under the laws bestowing those
benefits to veterans. The other two
exceptions are persons receiving care
under 5 U.S.C. 7901–7904 (employee
services) or under the Stafford Act. This
means that unless there has been a
Presidential declaration under the
Stafford Act, VA must seek
reimbursement for the hospital care and
medical services provided under section
1785 to persons who are not VA
beneficiaries.
Not all care authorized under 38
U.S.C. 1785 is provided under the
Stafford Act. Section 1785 authorizes
VA to provide care during a disaster or
emergency declared under the Stafford
Act or during activation of the National
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38043
Disaster Medical System (NDMS)
pursuant to section 2811(b) of the Public
Health Service Act. Activation of the
NDMS may take place without a
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster or emergency, and in that case
would be without a Stafford Act
declaration. If the care provided to other
individuals (i.e., individuals other than
the Federal officers or employees,
members of the Armed Forces, or VA
beneficiaries) does not fall under the
Stafford Act (for example, if NDMS is
activated without a Stafford Act
declaration), the appropriation language
referenced above compels VA to seek
reimbursement for the care provided
under 38 U.S.C. 1785 to individuals
who are not otherwise eligible for
hospital care or medical services at VA
expense. Other than officers or
employees of a non-VA department or
agency of the United States, or members
of the Armed Forces, those individuals
would generally include, e.g., an
individual who is not a veteran or a
veteran’s child, survivor, or dependent;
an individual who is a veteran but who
is not eligible for enrollment in the VA
healthcare system under 38 U.S.C. 1705
and § 17.36; or an individual who is a
veteran’s child, survivor, or dependent
but who is not eligible for such care and
services at VA expense under any laws
regarding certain categories of those
persons. Paragraph (e) of proposed
§ 17.86 would provide a process for
billing such individuals (other than
officers or employees of a non-VA
department or agency of the United
States, or members of the Armed Forces)
pursuant to § 17.102(h).
Besides the situation where the care
provided to such other individuals does
not fall under the Stafford Act,
situations arise where the care does fall
under the Act but VA does not receive
reimbursement from any other-than-VA
Federal department or agency. In such
situations, VA seeks reimbursement
from the individual. This has been longstanding VA practice and we propose to
incorporate this practice in paragraph
(e) by stating that ‘‘[o]ther individuals
who receive hospital care or medical
services under this section are
responsible for the cost of the hospital
care or medical services when charges
are mandated by Federal law (including
applicable appropriation acts) or when
the cost of care or services is not
reimbursed by other-than-VA Federal
departments or agencies.’’ (Emphasis
added.)
Under paragraph (e) of proposed
§ 17.86, the charges would be calculated
in accordance with the provisions of
§ 17.102(h). (This document proposes to
make technical changes to update the
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
38044
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
provisions of § 17.102(h) by removing
‘‘Cost Distribution Report’’, a report
which documented costs through
September, 2004, and by adding, in its
place, ‘‘Monthly Program Cost Report
(MPCR)’’, the report that VA currently
uses for purposes of § 17.102(h). This
document also proposes to make in
§ 17.102(h) clarifying technical changes
in the description of the report’s
contents regarding outpatient care.
Changes that this document is
proposing to make to § 17.102 for other
reasons are described below in this
preamble.) Paragraph (h) of § 17.102
provides a mechanism for charges to be
based on the MPCR, which sets forth the
actual basic costs and per diem rates by
type of inpatient care, and actual basic
costs and rates for outpatient care per
visit or prescription filled, with
additions based on:
• Factors for depreciation of
buildings and equipment,
• Central Office overhead,
• Interest on capital investment, and
• Standard fringe benefit costs
covering government employee
retirement and disability costs.
The formula in § 17.102(h) provides
an appropriate method for calculating
charges for services provided under 38
U.S.C. 1785 during certain disasters or
emergencies. As noted earlier, this
formula is already used to charge for
care to beneficiaries of the Department
of Defense and other Federal agencies.
It is also used to calculate charges for
individuals who receive emergency
hospital care or medical services on a
humanitarian basis (38 U.S.C. 1784).
Further, it is based on the cost of the
care provided to non-otherwise-eligible
beneficiaries, thereby ensuring that the
medical services account is reimbursed
for the cost of care provided, as required
by the current appropriation act. The
last sentence of paragraph (e) of
proposed § 17.86 notes that VA would
bill in accordance with § 17.102(h)
‘‘without applying the exception
provided in the first paragraph of
§ 17.102.’’ The exception provided in
the first paragraph of § 17.102 is a
reference to the possible applicability of
§ 17.101, a regulation covering the
collection or recovery by VA for medical
care and services described in 38 U.S.C.
1729. The exception in the first sentence
of § 17.102 would not be applicable in
any situation where care is provided
under section 1785, as veterans would
be receiving hospital care and medical
services pursuant to section 1785 rather
than section 1729.
Paragraph (f) of proposed § 17.86
would clarify that VA may furnish care
and services under § 17.86 to a veteran
without regard to whether he or she is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jul 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
enrolled in the VA healthcare system.
Paragraph (f) would reflect the
provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1785(c), which
state that VA may furnish care and
services under section 1785 to an
individual who is a veteran without
regard to whether the veteran is enrolled
in the VA patient enrollment system
under 38 U.S.C. 1705. Section 1785(c)
concerns the relationship of section
1785 and certain already existing
provisions of law. It clarifies the
possible impact of section 1705(c)(1) on
section 1785. A provision in section
1705(c)(1) states that VA may not
provide hospital care or medical
services to certain veterans under 38
U.S.C. 1710 (the statutory authorization
that is a key basis for VA’s provision of
hospital care and medical services to
veterans through its medical benefits
package) unless those veterans have
enrolled in the system of patient
enrollment mandated by section
1705(a). VA’s regulation at 38 CFR 17.36
reflects this requirement and states that
except in limited circumstances, a
veteran must be enrolled in the VA
healthcare system as a condition for
receiving hospital care and medical
services provided through VA’s medical
benefits package. The language in 38
U.S.C. 1705(c)(1) and the implementing
regulations at 38 CFR 17.36, if the
clarifying language in paragraph (c) had
not been included in section 1785,
could have led to an anomalous
situation where VA would have been
authorized to provide care to all
individuals affected by a Presidentiallydeclared major disaster or emergency, or
a disaster or emergency in which NDMS
is activated, except certain veterans who
were not previously enrolled for VA
healthcare. Section 1785(c) addresses
this unique situation, clarifying that a
veteran is not ineligible for care or
services under section 1785 merely
because the veteran (either because his
or her priority group is not eligible for
enrollment at the time, or because he or
she elected not to enroll for VA benefits)
is not enrolled in the VA healthcare
system.
This proposed rule would make a
technical change to the existing
regulations in § 17.102 regarding the
authority to provide humanitarian care
under 38 U.S.C. 1784. The current crossreference to the regulation authorizing
emergency hospital care on a
humanitarian basis is incorrect. 38 CFR
17.102(b)(1) refers to care or services
rendered as a humanitarian service
‘‘under § 17.43(c)(1).’’ There is no
§ 17.43(c)(1) in title 38 CFR. The crossreference listed in § 17.102(b)(1) should
be to § 17.43(b)(1), rather than to
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 17.43(c)(1). The proposed rule reflects
this technical correction. In addition, to
conform to the provisions of new
§ 17.86, this proposed rule would
amend § 17.102(h) by adding a reference
to § 17.86.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
OMB unless OMB waives such review,
as any regulatory action that is likely to
result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have
been examined and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory
action under the Executive Order
because it is likely to result in a rule that
may raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 133 / Thursday, July 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. In addition to affecting
individuals, this document would affect
mainly large insurance companies.
Further, where small entities would be
involved, they would not be impacted
significantly since an inconsequential
portion of their business would be with
VA. Accordingly, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), this proposed rule is exempt
from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
64.005, Grants to States for the
Construction of State Homes; 64.007,
Blind Rehabilitation Centers; 64.008,
Veterans Domiciliary Care; 64.009,
Veterans Medical Care Benefits; 64.010,
Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.011,
Veterans Dental Care; 64.012, Veterans
Prescription Service; 64.013, Veterans
Prosthetic Appliances; 64.014, Veterans
State Domiciliary Care; 64.015, Veterans
State Nursing Home Care; 64.016,
Veterans State Hospital Care; 64.018,
Sharing Specialized Medical Resources;
64.019, Veterans Rehabilitation Alcohol
and Drug Dependence; and 64.022,
Veterans Home Based Primary Care.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug
abuse, Foreign relations, Government
contracts, Grant programs-health, Grant
programs-veterans, Health care, Health
facilities, Health professions, Health
records, Homeless, Medical and Dental
schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs,
Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Approved: March 30, 2007.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part
17 as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jul 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, and as
noted in specific sections.
2. Add an undesignated center
heading and § 17.86 to read as follows:
Care During Certain Disasters and
Emergencies
§ 17.86 Provision of hospital care and
medical services during certain disasters
and emergencies under 38 U.S.C. 1785.
(a) This section sets forth regulations
regarding the provision of hospital care
and medical services under 38 U.S.C.
1785.
(b) During and immediately following
a disaster or emergency referred to in
paragraph (c) of this section, VA under
38 U.S.C. 1785 may furnish hospital
care and medical services to individuals
(including those who otherwise do not
have VA eligibility for such care and
services) responding to, involved in, or
otherwise affected by that disaster or
emergency.
(c) For purposes of this section, a
‘‘disaster’’ or ‘‘emergency’’ means:
(1) A major disaster or emergency
declared by the President under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
5121 et seq.)(‘‘Stafford Act’’); or
(2) A disaster or emergency in which
the National Disaster Medical System
established pursuant to section 2811(b)
of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300hh–11 (b)) is activated either
by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services under paragraph (3)(A) of that
section or as otherwise authorized by
law.
(d) For purposes of paragraph (b) of
this section, the terms ‘‘hospital care’’
and ‘‘medical services’’ have the
meanings given such terms by 38 U.S.C.
1701(5) and 1701(6).
(e) Unless the cost of care is charged
at rates agreed upon in a sharing
agreement as described in § 17.102(e),
the cost of hospital care and medical
services provided under this section to
an officer or employee of a department
or agency of the United States (other
than VA) or to a member of the Armed
Forces shall be calculated in accordance
with the provisions of § 17.102(c) and
(h). Other individuals who receive
hospital care or medical services under
this section are responsible for the cost
of the hospital care or medical services
when charges are mandated by Federal
law (including applicable appropriation
acts) or when the cost of care or services
is not reimbursed by other-than-VA
Federal departments or agencies. When
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38045
individuals are responsible under this
section for the cost of hospital care or
medical services, VA will bill in the
amounts calculated in accordance with
the provisions of § 17.102(h), without
applying the exception provided in the
first paragraph of § 17.102.
(f) VA may furnish care and services
under this section to a veteran without
regard to whether that individual is
enrolled in the VA healthcare system
under 38 U.S.C. 1705 and § 17.36 of this
part.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1785)
§ 17.102
[Amended]
3. Amend § 17.102 by:
a. In paragraph (b)(1), removing
‘‘§ 17.43(c)(1)’’ and adding, in its place,
‘‘§ 17.43(b)(1)’’.
b. In the first sentence of paragraph
(h), adding ‘‘§ 17.86 and under’’ after
‘‘charges under’’; removing ‘‘Cost
Distribution Report’’ and adding, in its
place, ‘‘Monthly Program Cost Report
(MPCR)’’; and removing ‘‘and outpatient
visit’’ and adding, in its place, ‘‘, and
actual basic costs and rates for
outpatient care visits or prescriptions
filled’’.
c. In the fifth sentence of paragraph
(h), removing ‘‘Cost Distribution
Report’’ and adding, in its place,
‘‘MPCR’’.
[FR Doc. E7–13278 Filed 7–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0359–200716; FRL–
8338–8]
Approval of Implementation Plans of
Alabama: Clean Air Interstate Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a revision to the Alabama State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on
March 7, 2007. This revision addresses
the requirements of EPA’s Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR), promulgated on
May 12, 2005, and subsequently revised
on April 28, 2006, and December 13,
2006. The Alabama Department of
Environmental Management (ADEM)
also previously submitted a final
submittal dated June 16, 2006, which
was subsequently updated in a
prehearing request for parallel
processing on November 16, 2006, to
comply with EPA’s revisions to the
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 133 (Thursday, July 12, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38042-38045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13278]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AM40
Provision of Hospital Care and Medical Services During Certain
Disasters or Emergencies
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to establish
regulations regarding the provision of hospital care and medical
services under the VA Emergency Preparedness Act of 2002 to individuals
responding to, involved in, or otherwise affected by certain disasters
or emergencies (including individuals who otherwise do not have VA
eligibility for such care and services).
DATES: Comment Date: Comments must be received on or before September
10, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to the Director,
Regulations Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Ave., NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202)
273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response
to ``RIN 2900-AM40--Provision of Hospital Care and Medical Services
During Certain Disasters or Emergencies.'' Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in the Office of Regulation
Policy and Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 273-
9515 for an appointment. In addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online in https://www.Regulations.gov through the
Federal Docket Management System (FDMS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tony A. Guagliardo, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office (163), Veterans Health Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 254-0384. (This is not a toll free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document proposes to amend the VA
``Medical'' regulations in 38 CFR part 17 by adding a new Sec. 17.86
and by making technical amendments in Sec. 17.102. As indicated in
paragraph (a) of proposed Sec. 17.86, this proposed rule would
implement the provisions of Public Law 107-287, the VA Emergency
Preparedness Act of 2002, regarding hospital care and medical services
provided to individuals responding to, involved in, or otherwise
affected by certain disasters or emergencies (including individuals who
otherwise do not have VA eligibility for such care and services). These
provisions are codified as 38 U.S.C. 1785.
Paragraphs (b) and (c) of proposed Sec. 17.86 would reflect the
provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1785, which provide that during and immediately
following a disaster or emergency VA may furnish hospital care and
medical services to individuals (including those who otherwise do not
have VA eligibility for such care and services) responding to, involved
in, or otherwise affected by:
[[Page 38043]]
A major disaster or emergency declared by the President
under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance
Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) (``Stafford Act''), or
A disaster or emergency in which the National Disaster
Medical System established pursuant to section 2811(b) of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300hh-11(b)) is activated either by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services under paragraph (3)(A) of that
section or as otherwise authorized by law.
Paragraph (d) of proposed Sec. 17.86 would define ``hospital
care'' and ``medical services'' according to the existing definitions
in 38 U.S.C. 1701(5) and 1701(6).
Under paragraph (e) of proposed Sec. 17.86, charges for care and
services furnished to an officer or employee of a department or agency
of the United States (other than VA) or to a member of the Armed Forces
would be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Sec.
17.102(h). Section 1785 states that VA shall be reimbursed for the cost
of any care or services furnished to an officer or employee of a
department or agency of the United States (other than VA) or to a
member of the Armed Forces at rates agreed upon based on the cost of
the care or service provided. An established system for charging for
care and services provided to beneficiaries of the Department of
Defense or other Federal agencies is already in place in Sec.
17.102(c), (e), and (h). The cost of such care is charged at rates
agreed upon in a sharing agreement described in Sec. 17.102(e), or
pursuant to the cost-based system described in Sec. 17.102(h). In
accordance with Sec. 17.102(h), which provides authority to
periodically do so, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and VA
have published a document in the ``Notices'' section of the Federal
Register entitled ``Cost-Based and Interagency Billing Rates for
Medical Care or Services Provided by the Department of Veterans
Affairs,'' 70 FR 66,866--66,868 (November 3, 2005). If the head of
another Federal agency or the Secretary of a branch of the Armed Forces
seeks VA hospital care or medical services for an officer, employee, or
member, this cost-based system is the agreed-upon method for
calculating the cost of such care or service unless the care provided
falls within an existing sharing agreement as described in Sec.
17.102(e).
Section 1785 is silent regarding charges to other individuals
(i.e., other than the Federal officers or employees or members of the
Armed Forces discussed in the immediately preceding paragraph of this
preamble) that are eligible for such care and services under section
1785 but would not otherwise be eligible for such care and services as
VA beneficiaries. This issue is discussed in the legislative history of
the VA Emergency Preparedness Act of 2002 in S. Rep. No. 107-229 (July
31, 2002), a report of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs. The
report states, at 9: ``[Section 1785] would also allow VA to receive
reimbursement for the cost of services provided to employees of other
Federal agencies or departments, to be credited to the facility that
provided care. VA would not be required to charge other individuals for
emergency care offered during a disaster.'' The language of the
statute, when considered with this legislative history, suggests that
Congress did not intend to require VA to seek reimbursement for
hospital care or medical services provided to other individuals during
a covered disaster or emergency. However, in addition to the statutory
language in section 1785, VA's current appropriation act impacts the
question of reimbursement for care provided to individuals who are not
otherwise eligible for hospital care or medical services at VA expense.
VA appropriation acts (including the appropriation act for fiscal
year 2006, Pub. L. 109-114) have historically included a provision
stating (with certain exceptions) that no appropriated funds shall be
available ``for hospitalization or examination of any persons'' (Pub.
L. 109-114, sec. 204) unless reimbursement for such care is made to the
medical services account at rates set by the Secretary. In the
appropriation act for fiscal year 2006 there are three exceptions. The
first exception is care provided to ``beneficiaries entitled under the
laws bestowing such benefits to veterans.'' In this preamble we use the
phrase ``VA beneficiaries'' to refer to individuals eligible for
hospitalization and medical care under the laws bestowing those
benefits to veterans. The other two exceptions are persons receiving
care under 5 U.S.C. 7901-7904 (employee services) or under the Stafford
Act. This means that unless there has been a Presidential declaration
under the Stafford Act, VA must seek reimbursement for the hospital
care and medical services provided under section 1785 to persons who
are not VA beneficiaries.
Not all care authorized under 38 U.S.C. 1785 is provided under the
Stafford Act. Section 1785 authorizes VA to provide care during a
disaster or emergency declared under the Stafford Act or during
activation of the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) pursuant to
section 2811(b) of the Public Health Service Act. Activation of the
NDMS may take place without a Presidential declaration of a major
disaster or emergency, and in that case would be without a Stafford Act
declaration. If the care provided to other individuals (i.e.,
individuals other than the Federal officers or employees, members of
the Armed Forces, or VA beneficiaries) does not fall under the Stafford
Act (for example, if NDMS is activated without a Stafford Act
declaration), the appropriation language referenced above compels VA to
seek reimbursement for the care provided under 38 U.S.C. 1785 to
individuals who are not otherwise eligible for hospital care or medical
services at VA expense. Other than officers or employees of a non-VA
department or agency of the United States, or members of the Armed
Forces, those individuals would generally include, e.g., an individual
who is not a veteran or a veteran's child, survivor, or dependent; an
individual who is a veteran but who is not eligible for enrollment in
the VA healthcare system under 38 U.S.C. 1705 and Sec. 17.36; or an
individual who is a veteran's child, survivor, or dependent but who is
not eligible for such care and services at VA expense under any laws
regarding certain categories of those persons. Paragraph (e) of
proposed Sec. 17.86 would provide a process for billing such
individuals (other than officers or employees of a non-VA department or
agency of the United States, or members of the Armed Forces) pursuant
to Sec. 17.102(h).
Besides the situation where the care provided to such other
individuals does not fall under the Stafford Act, situations arise
where the care does fall under the Act but VA does not receive
reimbursement from any other-than-VA Federal department or agency. In
such situations, VA seeks reimbursement from the individual. This has
been long-standing VA practice and we propose to incorporate this
practice in paragraph (e) by stating that ``[o]ther individuals who
receive hospital care or medical services under this section are
responsible for the cost of the hospital care or medical services when
charges are mandated by Federal law (including applicable appropriation
acts) or when the cost of care or services is not reimbursed by other-
than-VA Federal departments or agencies.'' (Emphasis added.)
Under paragraph (e) of proposed Sec. 17.86, the charges would be
calculated in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 17.102(h). (This
document proposes to make technical changes to update the
[[Page 38044]]
provisions of Sec. 17.102(h) by removing ``Cost Distribution Report'',
a report which documented costs through September, 2004, and by adding,
in its place, ``Monthly Program Cost Report (MPCR)'', the report that
VA currently uses for purposes of Sec. 17.102(h). This document also
proposes to make in Sec. 17.102(h) clarifying technical changes in the
description of the report's contents regarding outpatient care. Changes
that this document is proposing to make to Sec. 17.102 for other
reasons are described below in this preamble.) Paragraph (h) of Sec.
17.102 provides a mechanism for charges to be based on the MPCR, which
sets forth the actual basic costs and per diem rates by type of
inpatient care, and actual basic costs and rates for outpatient care
per visit or prescription filled, with additions based on:
Factors for depreciation of buildings and equipment,
Central Office overhead,
Interest on capital investment, and
Standard fringe benefit costs covering government employee
retirement and disability costs.
The formula in Sec. 17.102(h) provides an appropriate method for
calculating charges for services provided under 38 U.S.C. 1785 during
certain disasters or emergencies. As noted earlier, this formula is
already used to charge for care to beneficiaries of the Department of
Defense and other Federal agencies. It is also used to calculate
charges for individuals who receive emergency hospital care or medical
services on a humanitarian basis (38 U.S.C. 1784). Further, it is based
on the cost of the care provided to non-otherwise-eligible
beneficiaries, thereby ensuring that the medical services account is
reimbursed for the cost of care provided, as required by the current
appropriation act. The last sentence of paragraph (e) of proposed Sec.
17.86 notes that VA would bill in accordance with Sec. 17.102(h)
``without applying the exception provided in the first paragraph of
Sec. 17.102.'' The exception provided in the first paragraph of Sec.
17.102 is a reference to the possible applicability of Sec. 17.101, a
regulation covering the collection or recovery by VA for medical care
and services described in 38 U.S.C. 1729. The exception in the first
sentence of Sec. 17.102 would not be applicable in any situation where
care is provided under section 1785, as veterans would be receiving
hospital care and medical services pursuant to section 1785 rather than
section 1729.
Paragraph (f) of proposed Sec. 17.86 would clarify that VA may
furnish care and services under Sec. 17.86 to a veteran without regard
to whether he or she is enrolled in the VA healthcare system. Paragraph
(f) would reflect the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1785(c), which state that
VA may furnish care and services under section 1785 to an individual
who is a veteran without regard to whether the veteran is enrolled in
the VA patient enrollment system under 38 U.S.C. 1705. Section 1785(c)
concerns the relationship of section 1785 and certain already existing
provisions of law. It clarifies the possible impact of section
1705(c)(1) on section 1785. A provision in section 1705(c)(1) states
that VA may not provide hospital care or medical services to certain
veterans under 38 U.S.C. 1710 (the statutory authorization that is a
key basis for VA's provision of hospital care and medical services to
veterans through its medical benefits package) unless those veterans
have enrolled in the system of patient enrollment mandated by section
1705(a). VA's regulation at 38 CFR 17.36 reflects this requirement and
states that except in limited circumstances, a veteran must be enrolled
in the VA healthcare system as a condition for receiving hospital care
and medical services provided through VA's medical benefits package.
The language in 38 U.S.C. 1705(c)(1) and the implementing regulations
at 38 CFR 17.36, if the clarifying language in paragraph (c) had not
been included in section 1785, could have led to an anomalous situation
where VA would have been authorized to provide care to all individuals
affected by a Presidentially-declared major disaster or emergency, or a
disaster or emergency in which NDMS is activated, except certain
veterans who were not previously enrolled for VA healthcare. Section
1785(c) addresses this unique situation, clarifying that a veteran is
not ineligible for care or services under section 1785 merely because
the veteran (either because his or her priority group is not eligible
for enrollment at the time, or because he or she elected not to enroll
for VA benefits) is not enrolled in the VA healthcare system.
This proposed rule would make a technical change to the existing
regulations in Sec. 17.102 regarding the authority to provide
humanitarian care under 38 U.S.C. 1784. The current cross-reference to
the regulation authorizing emergency hospital care on a humanitarian
basis is incorrect. 38 CFR 17.102(b)(1) refers to care or services
rendered as a humanitarian service ``under Sec. 17.43(c)(1).'' There
is no Sec. 17.43(c)(1) in title 38 CFR. The cross-reference listed in
Sec. 17.102(b)(1) should be to Sec. 17.43(b)(1), rather than to Sec.
17.43(c)(1). The proposed rule reflects this technical correction. In
addition, to conform to the provisions of new Sec. 17.86, this
proposed rule would amend Sec. 17.102(h) by adding a reference to
Sec. 17.86.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any given year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521).
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review
by OMB unless OMB waives such review, as any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have been examined and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory action under the Executive
Order because it is likely to result in a rule that may raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
[[Page 38045]]
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In
addition to affecting individuals, this document would affect mainly
large insurance companies. Further, where small entities would be
involved, they would not be impacted significantly since an
inconsequential portion of their business would be with VA.
Accordingly, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this proposed rule is exempt
from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements
of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are 64.005, Grants to States for
the Construction of State Homes; 64.007, Blind Rehabilitation Centers;
64.008, Veterans Domiciliary Care; 64.009, Veterans Medical Care
Benefits; 64.010, Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.011, Veterans Dental
Care; 64.012, Veterans Prescription Service; 64.013, Veterans
Prosthetic Appliances; 64.014, Veterans State Domiciliary Care; 64.015,
Veterans State Nursing Home Care; 64.016, Veterans State Hospital Care;
64.018, Sharing Specialized Medical Resources; 64.019, Veterans
Rehabilitation Alcohol and Drug Dependence; and 64.022, Veterans Home
Based Primary Care.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Foreign relations,
Government contracts, Grant programs-health, Grant programs-veterans,
Health care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health records,
Homeless, Medical and Dental schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Approved: March 30, 2007.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of
Veterans Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part 17 as follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, and as noted in specific
sections.
2. Add an undesignated center heading and Sec. 17.86 to read as
follows:
Care During Certain Disasters and Emergencies
Sec. 17.86 Provision of hospital care and medical services during
certain disasters and emergencies under 38 U.S.C. 1785.
(a) This section sets forth regulations regarding the provision of
hospital care and medical services under 38 U.S.C. 1785.
(b) During and immediately following a disaster or emergency
referred to in paragraph (c) of this section, VA under 38 U.S.C. 1785
may furnish hospital care and medical services to individuals
(including those who otherwise do not have VA eligibility for such care
and services) responding to, involved in, or otherwise affected by that
disaster or emergency.
(c) For purposes of this section, a ``disaster'' or ``emergency''
means:
(1) A major disaster or emergency declared by the President under
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq.)(``Stafford Act''); or
(2) A disaster or emergency in which the National Disaster Medical
System established pursuant to section 2811(b) of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300hh-11 (b)) is activated either by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services under paragraph (3)(A) of that
section or as otherwise authorized by law.
(d) For purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, the terms
``hospital care'' and ``medical services'' have the meanings given such
terms by 38 U.S.C. 1701(5) and 1701(6).
(e) Unless the cost of care is charged at rates agreed upon in a
sharing agreement as described in Sec. 17.102(e), the cost of hospital
care and medical services provided under this section to an officer or
employee of a department or agency of the United States (other than VA)
or to a member of the Armed Forces shall be calculated in accordance
with the provisions of Sec. 17.102(c) and (h). Other individuals who
receive hospital care or medical services under this section are
responsible for the cost of the hospital care or medical services when
charges are mandated by Federal law (including applicable appropriation
acts) or when the cost of care or services is not reimbursed by other-
than-VA Federal departments or agencies. When individuals are
responsible under this section for the cost of hospital care or medical
services, VA will bill in the amounts calculated in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 17.102(h), without applying the exception provided
in the first paragraph of Sec. 17.102.
(f) VA may furnish care and services under this section to a
veteran without regard to whether that individual is enrolled in the VA
healthcare system under 38 U.S.C. 1705 and Sec. 17.36 of this part.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1785)
Sec. 17.102 [Amended]
3. Amend Sec. 17.102 by:
a. In paragraph (b)(1), removing ``Sec. 17.43(c)(1)'' and adding,
in its place, ``Sec. 17.43(b)(1)''.
b. In the first sentence of paragraph (h), adding ``Sec. 17.86 and
under'' after ``charges under''; removing ``Cost Distribution Report''
and adding, in its place, ``Monthly Program Cost Report (MPCR)''; and
removing ``and outpatient visit'' and adding, in its place, ``, and
actual basic costs and rates for outpatient care visits or
prescriptions filled''.
c. In the fifth sentence of paragraph (h), removing ``Cost
Distribution Report'' and adding, in its place, ``MPCR''.
[FR Doc. E7-13278 Filed 7-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P