Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a Permit Application for Compartments B and C, Palm Beach and Hendry Counties, FL, 37733-37735 [E7-13401]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 11, 2007 / Notices
Place of Meeting: Ronald Reagan
Building and International Trade
Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20004.
Purpose of Meeting: Review and
evaluate the Commission’s report and
the findings and recommendations
related to the Commission’s mission to
examine the care provided to wounded
service members.
Subject to seating availability this
meeting is open to the public.
The Commission will discuss its
report and recommendations;
consequently there will be no oral
public forum. Any person desiring to
make a written submission must
provide the point of contact listed below
with one copy of the written submission
by 18 July 2007 5 p.m. Point of Contact
is Major Teresa Barnes or Leslie Smith.
Telephone number is toll free (877)
588–2035 or Fax (703) 588–2046.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON SUBMITTING
STATEMENTS CONTACT: Major Teresa
Barnes or Leslie Smith, toll free (877)
588–2035 or fax (703) 588–2046.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Meeting agenda:
11 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. (Not Open to the
Public) Administrative Work Meeting.
11:15 a.m. To Be Determined (Public
Session) Review and Evaluation of
Commissions Findings and
Recommendations.
Dated: July 5, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07–3389 Filed 7–9–07; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Meeting of the President’s
Commission on Care for America’s
Returning Wounded Warriors
Department of Defense.
Federal Advisory Committee
Meeting Notice.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal
Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5
U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the
Sunshine in the Government Act of
1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended) and
41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
102–3.140 through 160, the Department
of Defense announces the cancellation
of the public meeting referenced below:
Name of Commission: President’s
Commission on Care for America’s
Returning Wounded Warriors (hereafter
referred to as the Commission).
Date of Meeting: July 16, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Jul 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
Time of Meeting: 10 a.m. to (To Be
Determined).
Place of Meeting: Ronald Reagan
Building and International Trade
Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20004.
Dated: July 5, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07–3390 Filed 7–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army: Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for a Permit Application for
Compartments B and C, Palm Beach
and Hendry Counties, FL
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Jacksonville District, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps), Jacksonville District,
will be receiving a permit application
for a Department of the Army permit
under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act from the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD) to
construct Stormwater Treatment Areas
(STAs) on parcels of land identified as
Compartments B and C of the
Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA)
(Proposed Action). As part of the permit
process, the Corps is evaluating the
environmental effects associated with
construction of STAs on these parcels in
order to provide additional treatment to
assist the existing STAs in the overall
goal of improving the quality of water
delivered and to be delivered to the
Everglades Protection Area (EPA) in
order to prevent further environmental
degradation.
The primary federal involvement
associated with the Proposed Action is
the discharge of fill material (including
permanent inundation) within federal
jurisdictional areas and Waters of the
United States. In addition, the Proposed
Action could have potential significant
effects on the human environment.
Therefore, the Corps will prepare an EIS
in compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to
render a final decision on the SFWMD’s
permit application. The Corps’ decision
will be to either issue or deny a
Department of the Army permit for the
Proposed Action. The Draft EIS is
intended to be sufficient in scope to
address federal, state, and local
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37733
requirements and environmental issues
concerning the Proposed Action and
permit reviews.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the Proposed Action
and Draft EIS should be directed to Ms.
Tori White, Corps Regulatory Project
Manager, by telephone at (561) 472–
8888 or by e-mail at
tori.white@usace.army.mil. Written
comments should be addressed to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South
Florida Restoration Program Office,
Attn: Ms. Tori White, 1400 Centrepark
Boulevard, Suite 750, West Palm Beach,
Florida 33401 or by facsimile at (561)
683–2418. Information about the
Proposed Action and Draft EIS can also
be obtained from the Jacksonville
District Web site at https://
www.saj.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Project Site and Background
Information. The Proposed Action is
located at Compartments B and C of the
EAA. Compartment B is located within
USGS Quadrangles of Deem City, North
of Deem City and West of Big Lake,
Sections 23, 24, 25 and 36, Township 46
south, Range 37 east; Sections 19, 20,
21, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33, Township
46 south, Range 38 east; Sections 05, 06,
08, 09, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21 and 22,
Township 47 south, Range 38 east. More
specifically it is located in southern
Palm Beach County east of Highway
U.S. 27, and west of Water Conservation
Area 2A and STA 2 in Southern Palm
Beach County, Florida. Compartment C
is located within the USGS Quadrangle
of Everglades 2NW and Everglades 2SW,
Sections 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
21, 22, 23, 24, 26 and 27, Township 47
south, Range 34 east. More specifically,
it is located west of the Rotenberger
Wildlife Management Area and east of
the L–3 Canal between STA–5 and
STA–6 in eastern Hendry County,
Florida.
(a) Background. On October 4, 1996,
the Corps published a Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS) for the initial
Everglades Construction Project (ECP)
which consisted of six STAs comprising
approximately 44,000 acres. The ECP
was implemented by the SFWMD as a
result of nutrient loads of stormwater
and runoff and high phosphorus loads
from the EAA, Lake Okeechobee, and
other contributory basins which
discharge into the EPA. The EPA
includes Water Conservation Areas 1
(Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee
National Wildlife Refuge), 2A, 2B, 3A,
3B and Everglades National Park. The
initial ECP was intended to achieve an
interim target discharge of a long-term
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
37734
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 11, 2007 / Notices
annual flow-weighted mean phosphorus
concentration of approximately 50 parts
per billion (50 ppb). Pursuant to the
Consent Decree in United States v.
South Florida Water Management
District, the State committed to provide
water quantity and quality needed to
preserve and restore the unique flora
and fauna of the Everglades National
Park and the Loxahatchee Wildlife
Refuge. The Everglades Forever Act
(EFA) embodies the same goals. The
SFWMD’s Long-Term Plan for
Achieving Water Quality Goals, October
27, 2003 and the November 2004
revision recommend further studies that
will help provide the additional
detailed information required for
making a more informed decision. In
2005, the SFWMD completed the EAA
Regional Feasibility Study as part of the
November 2004 revision to the LongTerm Plan. The Feasibility Study
evaluated additional treatment needed
in order to reduce phosphorus loads to
the EPA and comply with the EFA
including construction of STAs on
Compartments B and C.
(b) Purpose and Need. The overall
project purpose is to reduce nutrient
loads of stormwater and runoff from the
EAA and nutrient concentrations in
water delivered from Lake Okeechobee
prior to distribution into the EPA in
order to meet legal requirements. The
six existing STAs included in the ECP
were built and operated pursuant to the
requirements of the EFA and contain
approximately 40,000 acres of effective
treatment area. Subsequent to the design
and construction of these STAs, the
inflow volumes and phosphorus
concentrations loads were updated to
incorporate best available information,
including several years of actual STA
inflow data and outflow performance
data. One of the key assumptions during
the design of the original STAs was that
EAA Best Management Practices (BMPs)
would result in a 20% reduction in
inflow volumes; however, recent
historic data has shown that although
the required BMPs reduced phosphorus
loads, the assumed inflow volume
reductions have not occurred. The
Consent Decree assumed that flow lost
to BMPs would be replaced with
additional flow from Lake Okeechobee;
however, neither the original ECP
design flow nor the 2001 Basin-Specific
Feasibility Studies (ECP update with
enhanced STAs) provided treatment
capacity for those additional flows. In
addition to higher than originally
assumed stormwater runoff volumes
from the EAA, the STA inflow
phosphorus concentrations have also
shown notable increases in the past
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Jul 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
several years, likely a result of long-term
increasing trends in Lake Okeechobee
phosphorus concentrations, further
amplified by the 2004 and 2005
hurricanes, as well as additional lake
regulatory release volumes. The higherthan-anticipated EAA runoff volumes,
flows and loads from Lake Okeechobee,
and STA inflow concentrations have
resulted in impacts to existing STA
performance.
(c) Proposed Action. The SFWMD
proposes to convert approximately
13,740 acres of publicly owned,
primarily agricultural lands to
additional STAs. The Compartment B
STA will consist of approximately 6,700
acres of effective treatment area, and
will be operated in close coordination
with the existing STA–2 and STA–3/4
to assist in optimizing the phosphorus
removal performance of these two STAs.
Depending upon the hydrologic and
hydraulic conditions, the Compartment
B STA can assist in the reduction of
inflows to STA–1W and STA–1E, which
discharges into the WCA–1. The
Compartment C STA will consist of
approximately 6,200 acres of effective
treatment area, and can be operated in
close coordination with existing STA–5
and STA–6 to assist in the phosphorus
reduction capability of these two STAs,
which discharge into WCA–3A.
2. Alternatives. Alternatives to the
Proposed Action initially being
considered include:
(a) Construction of Compartment B
STA and Compartment C STA to treat
additional runoff in the EAA.
(b) Construction of Compartment B
STA to recover ability to treat Lake
Okeechobee volumes originally
intended to be treated by STA–3/4 and
construction of Compartment C STA to
treat additional runoff in the EAA.
(c) Construction of Compartment B
STA to treat a combination of Lake
Okeechobee volumes and EAA runoff
and construction of Compartment C
STA to treat additional runoff in the
EAA.
(d) Construction of STAs on
additional parcels of land.
(e) Additional Treatment
Technologies including but not limited
to hyacinth and algae turf scrubber
application.
(f) No Action.
3. Draft EIS Scoping Process.
(a) The Corps is furnishing this notice
to: (1) Advise other Federal and state
agencies, affected Tribes, and the public
of our intentions; (2) announce the
initiation of a 30-day scoping period;
and (3) obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues and
alternatives to be included in the Draft
EIS. The Corps invites comments from
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
all interested parties to ensure that the
full range of issues related to the permit
request is addressed and that all
significant issues are identified. We will
accept written comments until 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice.
(b) Significant issues to be analyzed in
the Draft EIS include: Aesthetics/visual
quality, agricultural resources, air
quality, biological resources, cultural
resources, cumulative impacts,
environmental justice, flood protection,
geology/soils, growth inducement, land
use/planning, noise/vibration, public
health and safety, public services/
utilities, recreation, socioeconomics,
threatened and endangered species,
traffic/circulation, water resources
including wetlands, and other issues
identified through scoping, public
involvement, and interagency
coordination.
(c) The Corps will conduct an
environmental review of the Proposed
Action in accordance with the
requirements of NEPA, 1969 as
amended, (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
its implementing regulations (40 Code
of Federal Regulations, Section 1500 et
seq.), Corps Procedures for
Implementing NEPA (33 Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 230 et
seq.), and with other appropriate federal
laws and regulations, policies, and
procedures of the Corps for compliance
with those regulations. The Proposed
Action, through the Corps permit review
process, will require consultation under
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
and Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. Additionally, the
proposed action would involve
evaluation for compliance with the
Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines of the
Clean Water Act; the MagnunsonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act; Water Quality
Certification pursuant to Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act; certification of
state lands, easements and right of ways;
and determination of Coastal Zone
Management Act consistency.
Additionally, the EIS will include an
evaluation of modifying land for new
uses which also involves zoning, land
use planning, water management, and
other regulatory requirements at the
local, state, and federal level. The
Compartments B and C lands were
purchased using funds appropriated to
the Department of Interior (DOI) under
the authority of the 1996 Farm Bill
(Federal Agriculture Improvement and
Reform Act of 1996, Public Law 104–
127, 110 Stat. 1022). The DOI, Corps,
Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, and the SFWMD are parties
to a Framework Agreement under which
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 11, 2007 / Notices
all interim uses of lands acquired with
these funds must be consistent with the
ultimate use of the property in a
congressionally authorized federal
project for Everglades restoration. The
SFWMD will be required to obtain a
land use approval from the DOI prior to
construction.
4. Scoping Meeting. Public scoping
meetings will be held on the Proposed
Action on July 25, 2007, at 6 p.m. at the
B1–Auditorium, SFWMD, 3301 Gun
Club Road, West Palm Beach and on
July 26, 2007, at 5 p.m. at the Institute
of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 3200
E. Palm Beach Road, Belle Glade,
Florida. The meetings will give agencies
and the public an opportunity to receive
more information on the Proposed
Action and to provide comments and
suggestions on the scope of the EIS.
5. Availability of the Draft EIS. The
Corps currently expects the Draft EIS to
be made available to the public in April
2008. A public meeting will be held
during the public comment period for
the Draft EIS. Written comments will be
accepted at the meeting.
Dated: July 3, 2007.
David S. Hobbie,
Chief, Regulatory Division, Jacksonville
District.
[FR Doc. E7–13401 Filed 7–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–AJ–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Postsecondary Education;
Overview Information; Developing
Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI)
Program; Notice Inviting Applications
for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY)
2007
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.031S.
Dates:
Applications Available: July 11, 2007.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: August 10, 2007.
Eligible Applicants: Institutions of
higher education (IHEs) that qualify as
eligible HSIs are eligible to apply for
new Individual Development Grants
and Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grants under the HSI
Program. To be an eligible HSI, an IHE
must—
(1) Be accredited or preaccredited by
a nationally recognized accrediting
agency or association that the Secretary
has determined to be a reliable authority
as to the quality of education or training
offered;
(2) Be legally authorized by the State
in which it is located to be a junior
college or to provide an educational
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Jul 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
program for which it awards a
bachelor’s degree;
(3) Be designated as an ‘‘eligible
institution’’ by demonstrating that it: (A)
Has an enrollment of needy students as
described in 34 CFR 606.3; and (B) has
low average educational and general
expenditures per full-time equivalent
(FTE) undergraduate student as
described in 34 CFR 606.4;
(4) Have an enrollment of
undergraduate FTE students that is at
least 25 percent Hispanic students at the
end of the award year immediately
preceding the date of application.
Effective September 30, 2006, the
Third Higher Education Extension Act
of 2006 (Pub. L. 109–292) amended
section 502(a) of the Higher Education
Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), by
requiring that institutions report their
undergraduate Hispanic FTE percentage
at the end of the award year
immediately preceding the date of
application. Funds for the Developing
HSI Program are awarded each fiscal
year, thus, for this program, the end of
the award year refers to the end of the
fiscal year prior to the application due
date. The end of the fiscal year occurs
on September 30. Therefore, for
purposes of making the determination
described in paragraph (4) IHEs must
report their undergraduate Hispanic
FTE percentage based on the student
enrollment count closest to, but not
after, September 30, 2006.
The Third Higher Education
Extension Act of 2006 also amended
section 502(a) of the HEA by eliminating
the requirement in the HSI Program that
an institution applying for a grant
provide an assurance that not less than
50 percent of the institution’s Hispanic
students are low-income individuals.
The Notice Inviting Applications for
Designation as Eligible Institutions for
FY 2007 was published in the Federal
Register on January 8, 2007 (72 FR 670).
The HSI eligibility requirements are in
34 CFR 606.2 through 606.5 and can be
accessed from the following Web site:
https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/
waisidx_01/34cfr606_01.html.
The regulations in 34 CFR part 606 do
not reflect the changes made by the
Third Higher Education Extension Act
of 2006 that are mentioned above.
Relationship Between HSI and Title III,
Part A Programs
Note 1: A grantee under the HSI Program,
which is authorized by Title V of the HEA,
may not receive a grant under any HEA, Title
III, Part A Program. The Title III, Part A
Programs include: The Strengthening
Institutions Program, the American Indian
Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities
Program; and the Alaska Native and Native
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37735
Hawaiian-Serving Institutions Programs.
Further, a current HSI Program grantee may
not give up its HSI grant in order to receive
a grant under any Title III, Part A Program.
Note 2: An HSI that does not fall within
the limitation described in Note 1 may apply
for a FY 2007 grant under all Title III, Part
A Programs for which it is eligible, as well
as under the HSI Program. However, a
successful applicant may receive only one
grant.
Note 3: An eligible HSI that submits more
than one application may only be awarded
one Individual Development Grant or one
Cooperative Arrangement Development Grant
in a fiscal year. Furthermore, we will not
award a second Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grant to an otherwise eligible
HSI for the same award year as the HSI’s
existing Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grant.
Note 4: The Department will crossreference for verification, data reported to the
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data
System (IPEDS), the IHE’s State-reported
enrollment data, and the institutional annual
report. If there are any differences in the
percentages reported in IPEDS and the
percentages reported in the grant application,
the IHE should justify the differences as a
part of its eligibility documentation.
Estimated Available Funds:
$17,181,510.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$550,000–$713,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
Individual Development Grant:
$575,000. Cooperative Arrangement
Development Grant: $713,000.
Maximum Awards: Individual
Development Grant: $575,000;
Cooperative Arrangement Development
Grant: $713,000. We will not fund any
application at an amount exceeding
these maximum amounts for a single
budget period of 12 months. We may
choose not to further consider or review
applications with budgets that exceed
the maximum amounts specified, if we
conclude, during our initial review of
the application, that the proposed goals
and objectives cannot be obtained with
the specified maximum amount.
Estimated Number of Awards:
Individual Development Grant: 15.
Cooperative Arrangement Development
Grant: 12.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice. Applicants should
periodically check the HSI Program Web site
for further information. The address is:
https://www.ed.gov/programs/idueshsi/
index.html.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The HSI Program
provides grants to assist HSIs to expand
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37733-37735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13401]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army: Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for a Permit Application for Compartments B and C, Palm Beach and
Hendry Counties, FL
AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Jacksonville
District, will be receiving a permit application for a Department of
the Army permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act from the South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) to construct Stormwater
Treatment Areas (STAs) on parcels of land identified as Compartments B
and C of the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) (Proposed Action). As
part of the permit process, the Corps is evaluating the environmental
effects associated with construction of STAs on these parcels in order
to provide additional treatment to assist the existing STAs in the
overall goal of improving the quality of water delivered and to be
delivered to the Everglades Protection Area (EPA) in order to prevent
further environmental degradation.
The primary federal involvement associated with the Proposed Action
is the discharge of fill material (including permanent inundation)
within federal jurisdictional areas and Waters of the United States. In
addition, the Proposed Action could have potential significant effects
on the human environment. Therefore, the Corps will prepare an EIS in
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to render
a final decision on the SFWMD's permit application. The Corps' decision
will be to either issue or deny a Department of the Army permit for the
Proposed Action. The Draft EIS is intended to be sufficient in scope to
address federal, state, and local requirements and environmental issues
concerning the Proposed Action and permit reviews.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the Proposed Action
and Draft EIS should be directed to Ms. Tori White, Corps Regulatory
Project Manager, by telephone at (561) 472-8888 or by e-mail at
tori.white@usace.army.mil. Written comments should be addressed to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Florida Restoration Program Office,
Attn: Ms. Tori White, 1400 Centrepark Boulevard, Suite 750, West Palm
Beach, Florida 33401 or by facsimile at (561) 683-2418. Information
about the Proposed Action and Draft EIS can also be obtained from the
Jacksonville District Web site at https://www.saj.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Project Site and Background Information. The Proposed Action is
located at Compartments B and C of the EAA. Compartment B is located
within USGS Quadrangles of Deem City, North of Deem City and West of
Big Lake, Sections 23, 24, 25 and 36, Township 46 south, Range 37 east;
Sections 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33, Township 46 south,
Range 38 east; Sections 05, 06, 08, 09, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21 and
22, Township 47 south, Range 38 east. More specifically it is located
in southern Palm Beach County east of Highway U.S. 27, and west of
Water Conservation Area 2A and STA 2 in Southern Palm Beach County,
Florida. Compartment C is located within the USGS Quadrangle of
Everglades 2NW and Everglades 2SW, Sections 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26 and 27, Township 47 south, Range 34 east. More
specifically, it is located west of the Rotenberger Wildlife Management
Area and east of the L-3 Canal between STA-5 and STA-6 in eastern
Hendry County, Florida.
(a) Background. On October 4, 1996, the Corps published a Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for the initial
Everglades Construction Project (ECP) which consisted of six STAs
comprising approximately 44,000 acres. The ECP was implemented by the
SFWMD as a result of nutrient loads of stormwater and runoff and high
phosphorus loads from the EAA, Lake Okeechobee, and other contributory
basins which discharge into the EPA. The EPA includes Water
Conservation Areas 1 (Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife
Refuge), 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B and Everglades National Park. The initial ECP
was intended to achieve an interim target discharge of a long-term
[[Page 37734]]
annual flow-weighted mean phosphorus concentration of approximately 50
parts per billion (50 ppb). Pursuant to the Consent Decree in United
States v. South Florida Water Management District, the State committed
to provide water quantity and quality needed to preserve and restore
the unique flora and fauna of the Everglades National Park and the
Loxahatchee Wildlife Refuge. The Everglades Forever Act (EFA) embodies
the same goals. The SFWMD's Long-Term Plan for Achieving Water Quality
Goals, October 27, 2003 and the November 2004 revision recommend
further studies that will help provide the additional detailed
information required for making a more informed decision. In 2005, the
SFWMD completed the EAA Regional Feasibility Study as part of the
November 2004 revision to the Long-Term Plan. The Feasibility Study
evaluated additional treatment needed in order to reduce phosphorus
loads to the EPA and comply with the EFA including construction of STAs
on Compartments B and C.
(b) Purpose and Need. The overall project purpose is to reduce
nutrient loads of stormwater and runoff from the EAA and nutrient
concentrations in water delivered from Lake Okeechobee prior to
distribution into the EPA in order to meet legal requirements. The six
existing STAs included in the ECP were built and operated pursuant to
the requirements of the EFA and contain approximately 40,000 acres of
effective treatment area. Subsequent to the design and construction of
these STAs, the inflow volumes and phosphorus concentrations loads were
updated to incorporate best available information, including several
years of actual STA inflow data and outflow performance data. One of
the key assumptions during the design of the original STAs was that EAA
Best Management Practices (BMPs) would result in a 20% reduction in
inflow volumes; however, recent historic data has shown that although
the required BMPs reduced phosphorus loads, the assumed inflow volume
reductions have not occurred. The Consent Decree assumed that flow lost
to BMPs would be replaced with additional flow from Lake Okeechobee;
however, neither the original ECP design flow nor the 2001 Basin-
Specific Feasibility Studies (ECP update with enhanced STAs) provided
treatment capacity for those additional flows. In addition to higher
than originally assumed stormwater runoff volumes from the EAA, the STA
inflow phosphorus concentrations have also shown notable increases in
the past several years, likely a result of long-term increasing trends
in Lake Okeechobee phosphorus concentrations, further amplified by the
2004 and 2005 hurricanes, as well as additional lake regulatory release
volumes. The higher-than-anticipated EAA runoff volumes, flows and
loads from Lake Okeechobee, and STA inflow concentrations have resulted
in impacts to existing STA performance.
(c) Proposed Action. The SFWMD proposes to convert approximately
13,740 acres of publicly owned, primarily agricultural lands to
additional STAs. The Compartment B STA will consist of approximately
6,700 acres of effective treatment area, and will be operated in close
coordination with the existing STA-2 and STA-3/4 to assist in
optimizing the phosphorus removal performance of these two STAs.
Depending upon the hydrologic and hydraulic conditions, the Compartment
B STA can assist in the reduction of inflows to STA-1W and STA-1E,
which discharges into the WCA-1. The Compartment C STA will consist of
approximately 6,200 acres of effective treatment area, and can be
operated in close coordination with existing STA-5 and STA-6 to assist
in the phosphorus reduction capability of these two STAs, which
discharge into WCA-3A.
2. Alternatives. Alternatives to the Proposed Action initially
being considered include:
(a) Construction of Compartment B STA and Compartment C STA to
treat additional runoff in the EAA.
(b) Construction of Compartment B STA to recover ability to treat
Lake Okeechobee volumes originally intended to be treated by STA-3/4
and construction of Compartment C STA to treat additional runoff in the
EAA.
(c) Construction of Compartment B STA to treat a combination of
Lake Okeechobee volumes and EAA runoff and construction of Compartment
C STA to treat additional runoff in the EAA.
(d) Construction of STAs on additional parcels of land.
(e) Additional Treatment Technologies including but not limited to
hyacinth and algae turf scrubber application.
(f) No Action.
3. Draft EIS Scoping Process.
(a) The Corps is furnishing this notice to: (1) Advise other
Federal and state agencies, affected Tribes, and the public of our
intentions; (2) announce the initiation of a 30-day scoping period; and
(3) obtain suggestions and information on the scope of issues and
alternatives to be included in the Draft EIS. The Corps invites
comments from all interested parties to ensure that the full range of
issues related to the permit request is addressed and that all
significant issues are identified. We will accept written comments
until 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.
(b) Significant issues to be analyzed in the Draft EIS include:
Aesthetics/visual quality, agricultural resources, air quality,
biological resources, cultural resources, cumulative impacts,
environmental justice, flood protection, geology/soils, growth
inducement, land use/planning, noise/vibration, public health and
safety, public services/utilities, recreation, socioeconomics,
threatened and endangered species, traffic/circulation, water resources
including wetlands, and other issues identified through scoping, public
involvement, and interagency coordination.
(c) The Corps will conduct an environmental review of the Proposed
Action in accordance with the requirements of NEPA, 1969 as amended,
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (40 Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 1500 et seq.), Corps Procedures for
Implementing NEPA (33 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 230 et
seq.), and with other appropriate federal laws and regulations,
policies, and procedures of the Corps for compliance with those
regulations. The Proposed Action, through the Corps permit review
process, will require consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
Additionally, the proposed action would involve evaluation for
compliance with the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines of the Clean Water
Act; the Magnunson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act;
Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act; certification of state lands, easements and right of ways; and
determination of Coastal Zone Management Act consistency. Additionally,
the EIS will include an evaluation of modifying land for new uses which
also involves zoning, land use planning, water management, and other
regulatory requirements at the local, state, and federal level. The
Compartments B and C lands were purchased using funds appropriated to
the Department of Interior (DOI) under the authority of the 1996 Farm
Bill (Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996, Public
Law 104-127, 110 Stat. 1022). The DOI, Corps, Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, and the SFWMD are parties to a Framework
Agreement under which
[[Page 37735]]
all interim uses of lands acquired with these funds must be consistent
with the ultimate use of the property in a congressionally authorized
federal project for Everglades restoration. The SFWMD will be required
to obtain a land use approval from the DOI prior to construction.
4. Scoping Meeting. Public scoping meetings will be held on the
Proposed Action on July 25, 2007, at 6 p.m. at the B1-Auditorium,
SFWMD, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach and on July 26, 2007, at 5
p.m. at the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 3200 E. Palm
Beach Road, Belle Glade, Florida. The meetings will give agencies and
the public an opportunity to receive more information on the Proposed
Action and to provide comments and suggestions on the scope of the EIS.
5. Availability of the Draft EIS. The Corps currently expects the
Draft EIS to be made available to the public in April 2008. A public
meeting will be held during the public comment period for the Draft
EIS. Written comments will be accepted at the meeting.
Dated: July 3, 2007.
David S. Hobbie,
Chief, Regulatory Division, Jacksonville District.
[FR Doc. E7-13401 Filed 7-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-AJ-P