Notice of Information Collection Under OMB Review, 37543-37544 [E7-13281]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 10, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[ID–957–1420–BJ]
Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats of
Surveys.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has officially filed
the plats of survey of the lands
described below in the BLM Idaho State
Office, Boise, Idaho, effective 9 a.m., on
the dates specified.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bureau of Land Management, 1387
South Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709–
1657.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These
surveys were executed at the request of
the Bureau of Land Management to meet
their administrative needs. The lands
surveyed are:
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey of portions of the west
boundary, subdivisional lines, and the
1960–1968 fixed and limiting
boundaries in sections 6, 7, 17, 18 and
20, and Tract 40, and the subdivision of
sections 6, 7, 17 and 18, the survey of
the 1993–2003 meanders of the Snake
River in sections 6, 7, 17, 18 and 20, the
survey of the 1993–2003 meanders of
certain islands in the Snake River, and
the metes-and-bounds survey of the
centerline of an existing flood control
levee in the SE1⁄4 of the SW1⁄4 of section
6, T. 4 N., R. 40 E., Boise Meridian,
Idaho, was accepted June 6, 2007.
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey of a portion of the east
boundary and a portion of the
subdivisional lines, and the subdivision
of section 24, T. 16 S., R. 9 E., Boise
Meridian, Idaho, was accepted June 29,
2007.
This survey was executed at the
request of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
to meet certain administrative and
management purposes. The lands
surveyed are:
This supplemental plat was prepared
to amend lotting in section 24, T. 3 S.,
R. 34 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, was
accepted April 3, 2007.
These surveys were executed at the
request of the USDA Forest Service to
meet certain administrative and
management purposes. The lands
surveyed are:
This supplemental plat, showing
amended lotting created by the
segregation of Mineral Survey No. 1659
in section 15, T. 41 N., R. 2 W., Boise
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jul 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
Meridian, Idaho, was accepted April 20,
2007.
This supplemental plat, was prepared
to show new lots to the centerline of
State Highway No. 6, of sections 12, 13,
and 14, T. 43 N., R. 3 W., Boise
Meridian, Idaho, was accepted April 26,
2007.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) will file the plat of
survey of the lands described below in
the BLM Idaho State Office, Boise,
Idaho, 30 days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register.
This survey was executed at the request
of the Bureau of Indian Affairs to meet
certain administrative and management
purposes:
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey of the south boundary,
portions of the east and west
boundaries, subdivisional lines, and
meanders of the Snake River and islands
in the Snake River, and the subdivision
of sections 32 and 36, and the survey of
portions of the south and west
boundaries, subdivisional lines, the
2005–2006 meanders of the Snake River
and islands in the Snake River, and the
North Boundary of the Fort Hall Indian
Reservation, T. 4 S., R. 33 E., Boise
Meridian, Idaho, was accepted May 16,
2007.
Dated: July 3, 2007.
Stanley G. French,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. E7–13344 Filed 7–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 332–485]
Canned Peaches, Pears, and Fruit
Mixtures: Conditions of Competition
Between U.S. and Principal Foreign
Supplier Industries
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Cancellation of public hearing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On July 2, 2007, the only
scheduled witness for the hearing in
investigation No. 332–485, Canned
Peaches, Pears, and Fruit Mixtures:
Conditions of Competition between U.S.
and Principal Foreign Supplier
Industries, scheduled for July 12, 2007,
withdrew his request to appear.
Therefore, the public hearing in this
investigation has been canceled.
Background: The Commission
published notice of institution of the
investigation and hearing in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2007 (72 FR
6744). The notice asked that persons
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37543
interested in appearing at the hearing
file their requests by the close of June
28, 2007, and stated that the hearing
would be canceled if no requests were
received by that date. One request was
received by the June 28 deadline, but it
was subsequently withdrawn on July 2,
2007. Accordingly, the Commission has
canceled the hearing. All other
information about the investigation,
including a description of the subject
matter to be addressed, contact
information, and procedures relating to
written submissions, remains the same
as in the original notice. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/edis.htm.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 3, 2007.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–13276 Filed 7–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: (07–051)]
Notice of Information Collection Under
OMB Review
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of information collection
under OMB review.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–13, 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: All comments should be
submitted within 30 calendar days from
the date of this publication.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be
addressed to Desk Officer for NASA;
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs; Room 10236; New Executive
Office Building; Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Mr. Walter Kit, NASA
PRA Officer, NASA Headquarters, 300 E
Street, SW., JE0000, Washington, DC
20546, (202) 358–1350,
Walter.Kit-1@nasa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
37544
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 10, 2007 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
I. Abstract
The NASA Explorer Schools (NES)
seeks a clearance to collect data from
educators to determine eligibility and
selection of schools to participate in
their three year project. To lessen the
impact on educators who will complete
the project application, the application
period must be open during the times
when they are less likely to be needed
in the classroom (e.g., summer break)
and can obtain any required school
board approvals.
II. Method of Collection
NASA will utilize a Web-based online
form to collect this information.
III. Data
Title: NASA Explorer Schools Project
Application.
OMB Number: 2700–0130.
Type of review: Regular.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
130.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 130.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of NASA, including
whether the information collected has
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
NASA’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including automated
collection techniques or the use of other
forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection.
They will also become a matter of
public record.
Gary Cox,
Acting Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–13281 Filed 7–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jul 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
[Docket No. 50–255]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of
Amendment to Renewed Facility
Operating License, Proposed No
Significant Hazards Consideration
Determination, and Opportunity for a
Hearing
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) is
considering issuance of an amendment
to Renewed Facility Operating License
No. DPR–20 issued to Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. (the licensee) for
operation of the Palisades Nuclear Plant
(PNP) located in Van Buren County,
Michigan.
The proposed amendment would
revise Technical Specification (TS)
3.5.5, ‘‘Trisodium Phosphate,’’ and the
associated surveillance requirements by
replacing the containment sump
buffering agent, trisodium phosphate
(TSP), with sodium tetraborate
decahydrate (STB). In particular, the
proposed amendment would revise the
TS Limiting Condition for Operation
(LCO) 3.5.5, with a new weight
requirement for STB.
Before issuance of the proposed
license amendment, the Commission
will have made findings required by the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), and the Commission’s
regulations.
The Commission has made a
proposed determination that the
amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration. Under
the Commission’s regulations in Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), Section 50.92, this means that
operation of the facility in accordance
with the proposed amendment would
not (1) Involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or (2)
create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated; or (3)
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR
50.91(a), the licensee has provided its
analysis of the issue of no significant
hazards consideration, which is
presented below:
1. Does the proposed amendment involve
a significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed amendment does not involve
a significant increase in the probability of an
accident previously evaluated because the
containment buffering agent is not an
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
initiator of any analyzed accident. The
proposed change does not impact any failure
modes that could lead to an accident.
The proposed amendment does not involve
a significant increase in the consequences of
an accident previously evaluated. The
buffering agent in containment is designed to
buffer the acids expected to be produced after
a loss of coolant accident (LOCA) and is
credited in the radiological analysis for
iodine retention. The proposed change of
replacing TSP with STB in containment
results in the radiological consequences
remaining under 10 CFR 100 limits and
General Design Criterion (GDC) ¥19 limits.
Therefore, operation of the facility in
accordance with the proposed amendment
would not involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated.
2. Does the proposed amendment create
the possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed amendment does not create
the possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated. STB is a passive component that
is proposed to be used at PNP as a buffering
agent to increase the pH of the initially acidic
post-LOCA containment water to a more
neutral pH.
Changing the proposed buffering agent
from TSP to STB does not constitute an
accident initiator or create a new or different
kind of accident previously analyzed. The
proposed amendment does not involve
operation of any required systems, structures
or components (SSCs) in a manner or
configuration different from those previously
recognized or evaluated. No new failure
mechanisms will be introduced by the
changes being requested.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does
not create the possibility of a new or different
kind of accident from any accident
previously evaluated.
3. Does the proposed amendment involve
a significant reduction in a margin of safety?
Response: No.
The proposed amendment does not involve
a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
The proposed amendment of changing the
buffering agent from TSP to STB results in
equivalent control of maintaining sump pH at
7.0 or greater, thereby controlling
containment atmosphere iodine and ensuring
the radiological consequences of a MHA
[Maximum Hypothetical Accident] are
within regulatory limits. The use of STB also
reduces the present potential for exacerbating
sump screen blockage due to a potential
chemical interaction between TSP and
certain calcium sources used in containment
to form calcium phosphate. This proposed
amendment removes this phosphate source
from containment, thereby reducing the
amount of precipitate that may be formed in
a postulated LOCA. The buffer change would
minimize the potential chemical effects and
should enhance the ability of the emergency
core cooling system to perform the postaccident mitigating functions.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does
not involve a significant reduction in the
margin of safety.
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37543-37544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13281]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: (07-051)]
Notice of Information Collection Under OMB Review
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of information collection under OMB review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: All comments should be submitted within 30 calendar days from
the date of this publication.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Desk Officer for NASA;
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; Room 10236; New Executive
Office Building; Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Mr. Walter Kit, NASA PRA Officer, NASA
Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW., JE0000, Washington, DC 20546, (202)
358-1350, Walter.Kit-1@nasa.gov.
[[Page 37544]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The NASA Explorer Schools (NES) seeks a clearance to collect data
from educators to determine eligibility and selection of schools to
participate in their three year project. To lessen the impact on
educators who will complete the project application, the application
period must be open during the times when they are less likely to be
needed in the classroom (e.g., summer break) and can obtain any
required school board approvals.
II. Method of Collection
NASA will utilize a Web-based online form to collect this
information.
III. Data
Title: NASA Explorer Schools Project Application.
OMB Number: 2700-0130.
Type of review: Regular.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 130.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 130.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
NASA, including whether the information collected has practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of NASA's estimate of the burden (including
hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including automated collection techniques
or the use of other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection. They will also become a matter of public record.
Gary Cox,
Acting Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-13281 Filed 7-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
