Third Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, 37310-37344 [E7-12905]
Download as PDF
37310
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 07–91; FCC 07–70]
Third Periodic Review of the
Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document begins the
Commission’s third periodic review of
the transition of the nation’s broadcast
television system from analog to digital
television. It provides a progress report
on the DTV transition and considers the
procedures and rule changes necessary
to ensure that broadcasters timely
complete their transitions. Congress has
mandated that after February 17, 2009,
full-power television broadcast stations
must transmit only digital signals, and
may no longer transmit analog signals.
This document considers how to ensure
that broadcasters complete construction
of their final, post-transition (digital)
facilities by the statutory deadline.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
August 8, 2007; reply comments are due
on or before August 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by MB Docket No. 07–91, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Filers should
follow the instructions provided on the
website for submitting comments. For
ECFS filers, if multiple docket or
rulemaking numbers appear in the
caption of this proceeding, filers must
transmit one electronic copy of the
comments for each docket or
rulemaking number referenced in the
caption. In completing the transmittal
screen, filers should include their full
name, U.S. Postal Service mailing
address, and the applicable docket or
rulemaking number.
• E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov. To get filing
instructions, filers should send an email to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the
following words in the body of the
message, ‘‘get form.’’ A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
• Mail: Filings can be sent by
commercial overnight courier or by firstclass or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail (although we continue to
experience delays in receiving U.S.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Postal Service mail). Parties who choose
to file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission. Commercial overnight
mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be
sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive,
Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal
Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail should be addressed to 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington DC 20554.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Filings can
be sent by hand or messenger delivery.
The Commission’s contractor will
receive hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours
at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All
hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building. Parties who
choose to file by paper must file an
original and four copies of each filing.
If more than one docket or rulemaking
number appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• Accessibility Information: Contact
the FCC to request information in
accessible formats (computer diskettes,
large print, audio recording, and Braille)
by sending an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov
or calling the FCC’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY). This document can also be
downloaded in Word and Portable
Document Format (PDF) at: https://
www.fcc.gov.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking.
Comments, reply comments, and ex
parte submissions will be available for
public inspection during regular
business hours in the FCC Reference
Center, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CY–
A257, Washington, DC, 20554. These
documents will also be available via
ECFS. Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/
or Adobe Acrobat. For detailed
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
instructions for submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Evan Baranoff,
Evan.Baranoff@fcc.gov of the Media
Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418–2120
or Eloise Gore, Eloise.Gore@fcc.gov, of
the Media Bureau, Policy Division, (202)
418–2120; Gordon Godfrey,
Gordon.Godfrey@fcc.gov, of the Media
Bureau, Engineering Division, (202)
418–7000; Nazifa Sawez,
Nazifa.Sawez@fcc.gov, of the Media
Bureau, Video Division, (202) 418–1600;
or Alan Stillwell,
Alan.Stillwell@fcc.gov, of the Office of
Engineering and Technology, (202) 418–
2470.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 07–70,
adopted on April 25, 2007, and released
on May 18, 2007. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection and copying during regular
business hours in the FCC Reference
Center, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CY–
A257, Washington, DC 20554. These
documents will also be available via
ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/).
(Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/
or Adobe Acrobat.) The complete text
may be purchased from the
Commission’s copy contractor, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
This document has been analyzed
with respect to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (‘‘PRA’’), and
contains proposed new and modified
information collection requirements,
including the following proposals: (1)
Applications detailing stations’ plans
for completing their transitions; (2)
Applications to construct or modify
post-transition facilities (using FCC
Forms 301 and 340); (3) Requests to
reduce analog TV service; (4) Requests
to terminate analog TV service; (5)
Requests to flash cut; (6) Requests for
STA to use analog translators to offset
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
loss of analog service; (7) Requests for
extension of time to construct (using
FCC Form 337), or to toll the
construction deadline for, DTV
facilities; (8) Requests to transition early
to their post-transition channel; (9)
Requests for STA to temporarily remain
on their in-core pre-transition DTV
channel; (10) Requests for STA to build
less than full, authorized post-transition
facilities by the deadline; (11)
Applications for a license to cover posttransition facilities (using FCC Form 302
DTV); and (12) PSIP requirement to
populate the Event Information Tables
(‘‘EITs’’) with accurate information
about each event and to update the EIT
if more accurate information becomes
available. The Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
the Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) to comment on the proposed
information collection requirements
contained in this document, as required
by the PRA.
Written comments on the PRA
proposed information collection
requirements must be submitted by the
public, the OMB, and other interested
parties on or before September 7, 2007.
Comments should address: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimates; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
In addition, pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
we seek specific comment on how we
might ‘‘further reduce the information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees.’’
In addition to filing comments with
the Office of the Secretary, a copy of any
comments on the proposed information
collection requirements contained
herein should be submitted to Cathy
Williams, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th St, SW., Room 1–
C823, Washington, DC 20554, or via the
Internet to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov; and
also to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB, Room
10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, or via Internet
to Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or
via fax at 202–395–5167. If you would
like to obtain a coy of this information
collection, you may do so by visiting the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
FCC’s PRA webpage at https://
www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.
Further Information. For additional
information concerning the PRA
proposed information collection
requirements contained in this
document, contact Cathy Williams at
202–418–2918, or via the Internet to
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov or
PRA@fcc.gov.
OMB Control Number: 3060–0027.
Title: Application for Construction
Permit for Commercial Broadcast
Station, FCC Form 301.
Form Number: FCC Form 301.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.
Number of Respondents: 4,278.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement; Third party
disclosure requirement.
Estimated Time Per Response: 2 to 4
hours.
Total Annual Burden: 10,513 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $51,350,347.
Nature of Response: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for
confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007,
the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), In the
Matter of the Third Periodic Review of
the Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07–91, FCC
07–70. The NPRM proposes that
commercial television stations must use
the proposed revised FCC Form 301
when applying for post-transition
facilities, when requesting to reduce
analog TV service and when requesting
to transition early to their posttransition channel. FCC Form 301 is
being revised to accommodate the filing
of post-transition applications.
FCC Form 301 is used to apply for
authority to construct a new commercial
AM, FM, or TV broadcast station, to
make changes in existing facilities of
such a station, and may be used to
request a change of a station’s
community of license by AM and nonreserved band FM permittees and
licensees. In addition, FM licensees or
permittees may request, by filing an
application on FCC Form 301, upgrades
on adjacent and co-channels,
modifications to adjacent channels of
the same class, and downgrades to
adjacent channels.
OMB Control Number: 3060–0029.
Title: Application for TV Broadcast
Station License, FCC Form 302 TV;
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37311
Application for DTV Broadcast Station
License, FCC Form 302–DTV,
Application for Construction Permit for
Reserved Channel Noncommercial
Educational Broadcast Station, FCC
Form 340; Application for Authority to
Construct or Make Changes in an FM
Translator or FM Booster Station, FCC
Form 349.
Form Number(s): FCC Form 302 TV;
FCC Form 302–DTV; FCC Form 340;
FCC Form 349.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions; State, local or tribal
government.
Number of Respondents: 4,325.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement; Recordkeeping
requirement; Third party disclosure
requirement.
Estimated Time per Response: 2 to 4
hours.
Total Annual Burden: 12,150 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $21,091,625.
Nature of Response: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for
confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007,
the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), In the
Matter of the Third Periodic Review of
the Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07–91, FCC
07–70, to consider the procedures and
rule changes necessary to complete the
nation’s transition to DTV, including
how best to ensure that broadcasters
complete construction of their facilities
on their final, post-transition (digital)
channel by the statutory deadline.
The NPRM proposes that
Noncommercial Education (NCE)
television stations must use the
proposed revised FCC Form 340 when
applying for authority to construct or
modify post-transition facilities; when
requesting to reduce analog TV service
and when requesting to transition early
to their post-transition channel.
Therefore, FCC Form 340 is being
revised to accommodate the filing of
applications to construct or modify
post-transition facilities.
The NPRM also proposes that stations
that have applied to construct or modify
post-transition facilities must use the
Form 302—DTV to obtain a new or
modified station license to cover those
post-transition facilities.
In addition, the Commission is
consolidating information collection
OMB Control Number 3060–0837
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37312
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(Application for DTV Broadcast Station
License, FCC 302–DTV) into this
collection OMB Control Number 3060–
0029.
FCC Forms 302–TV, 302–DTV and
349 remain unchanged.
OMB Control Number: 3060–0407.
Title: Application for Extension of
Time to Construct a Digital Television
Broadcast Station, FCC Form 337;
Section 73.3598, Period of Construction.
Form Number: FCC Form 337.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 160.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement; Recordkeeping
requirement.
Estimated Time Per Response: 0.25 to
3 hours.
Total Annual Burden: 263 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $37,000.
Nature of Response: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for
confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007,
the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in the matter of
the Third Periodic Review of the
Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07–91, FCC
07–70, to consider the procedures and
rule changes necessary to complete the
nation’s transition to DTV, including
how best to ensure that broadcasters
complete construction of their facilities
on their final, post-transition (digital)
channel by the statutory deadline.
The NPRM proposes that stations
requesting an extension of time to
construct DTV facilities with
construction deadlines occurring prior
to February 17, 2009, the station must
use the Form 337 in accordance with 47
CFR 73.624(d)(3). The NPRM proposes
to revise Form 337 to accommodate
these filings. Also, for stations with
construction deadlines occurring on
February 17, 2009 and later, the station
must make a letter filing in accordance
with 47 CFR 73.3598.
In addition, the Commission is
consolidating information collection
OMB Control Number 3060–1001
(Application for Extension of Time to
Construct a Digital Television Broadcast
Station, FCC Form 337) into this
collection OMB Control Number 3060–
0407 (Section 73.3598, Period of
Construction).
OMB Control Number: 3060–0386.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Title: Section 73.1635, Special
Temporary Authorizations (STAs).
Form Number: Not applicable.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 2,350.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 to 4
hours.
Total Annual Burden: 2,800 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $1,403,150.
Nature of Response: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for
confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007,
the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of
the Third Periodic Review of the
Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07–91, FCC
07–70, to consider the procedures and
rule changes necessary to complete the
nation’s transition to DTV, including
how best to ensure that broadcasters
complete construction of their facilities
on their final, post-transition (digital)
channel by the statutory deadline.
For purposes of the DTV transition,
the NPRM proposes that stations may
file requests for Special Temporary
Authorities (STAs) to use analog
translators to offset the loss of analog
service when seeking to reduce or
terminate analog service prior to the
transition deadline (i.e., February 17,
2009); to temporarily remain on their incore pre-transition DTV channel after
the DTV transition deadline (i.e.,
February 17, 2009), and to build less
than full, authorized post-transition
facilities by the transition deadline (i.e.,
February 17, 2009).
OMB Control Number: 3060–0216.
Title: Informal Requests to
Discontinue Only One Service and
Informal Requests to Flash Cut; Section
73.3538, Application To Make Changes
in an Existing Station, Section
73.1690(e) Modification of Transmission
Systems.
Form Number: Not Applicable.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 700.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement; Recordkeeping
requirement.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Estimated Time Per Response: 0.50—
3 hours.
Total Annual Burden: 1,125 hours
Total Annual Costs: None.
Nature of Response: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for
confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007,
the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of
the Third Periodic Review of the
Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07–91, FCC
07–70, to consider the procedures and
rule changes necessary to complete the
nation’s transition to DTV, including
how best to ensure that broadcasters
complete construction of their facilities
on their final, post-transition (digital)
channel by the statutory deadline.
The NPRM proposes to allow stations
to request Commission approval to
discontinue analog TV service prior to
the end of the DTV transition. To obtain
such approval from the Commission, the
NPRM proposes to allow stations to
make such requests by sending a letter
to the Video Division of the Media
Bureau and sending an e-mail to
analog@fcc.gov in lieu of filing an
application for construction permit (e.g.,
Form 301 or Form 340).
The NPRM also considers whether to
allow stations to request Commission
approval to return their currently
assigned, pre-transition-only DTV
channel (i.e., a DTV channel that is not
their final, post-transition channel) and
flash cut at or before the transition
deadline from their current analog
channel to their final, post-transition
channel.
Section 73.1690(e) of the
Commission’s rules requires AM, FM
and TV station licensees to prepare an
informal statement or diagram
describing any electrical and
mechanical modification to authorized
transmitting equipment that can be
made without prior Commission
approval provided that equipment
performance measurements are made to
ensure compliance with FCC rules. This
informal statement or diagram must be
retained at the transmitter site as long as
the equipment is in use. This
requirement is approved in OMB
Control Number 3060–0374, but is being
consolidated into this collection (3060–
0216).
Section 73.3538 requires broadcast
stations to file an informal application
to modify or discontinue the obstruction
marking or lighting of an antenna
supporting structure. The NPRM does
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
not affect this requirement. It has
already been approved by OMB.
OMB Control Number: 3060-XXXX.
Title: Digital TV Transition Status
Report.
Form Number: FCC Form 387.
Type of Review: New Collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 1,812.
Frequency of Response: One-time
reporting requirement.
Estimated Time per Response: 2
hours.
Total Annual Burden: 3,624 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $1,268,400.
Nature of Response: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for
confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007,
the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of
the Third Periodic Review of the
Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07–91, FCC
07–70. This is a review of the transition
of the nation’s broadcast television
system from analog to digital television.
This NPRM, among other things,
proposes to require all full-power
television stations to file a form (FCC
Form 387) with the Commission
detailing their transition status on or
before December 1, 2007.
OMB Control Number: 3060–XXXX.
Title: Section 73.682(d), TV
Transmission Standards.
Form Number: Not applicable.
Type of Review: New Collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 1,812.
Frequency of Response: Weekly
reporting requirement; Third party
disclosure requirement.
Estimated Time Per Response: 0.50
hours.
Total Annual Burden: 47,112 hours.
Total Annual Costs: None.
Nature of Response: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for
confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007,
the Commission adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of
the Third Periodic Review of the
Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07–91, FCC
07–70. The NPRM proposes to update
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Section 73.682(d) of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 73.682(d), to reflect
revisions to the Advanced Television
Systems Committee Inc’s (ATSC)
Program System Information Protocol
(PSIP) standard. The revised ATSC PSIP
standard requires broadcasters to
populate the Event Information Tables
(‘‘EITs’’) with accurate information
about each event and to update the EIT
if more accurate information becomes
available. In other words, it requires
broadcasters to provide detailed
programming information when
transmitting their broadcast signal.
Currently, under version A/65–B, many
broadcasters provide only general
information in the EIT tables.
Summary of the NPRM of Proposed
Rulemaking
I. Introduction
1. Congress has mandated that after
February 17, 2009, full-power broadcast
stations must transmit only in digital
signals, and may no longer transmit
analog signals. With this Notice of
Proposed Rule Making (‘‘NPRM’’), we
begin our third periodic review of the
transition of the nation’s broadcast
television system from analog to digital
television (‘‘DTV’’). The Commission
has conducted two prior periodic
reviews: the first in MM Docket No. 00–
39 and the second in MB Docket No.
03–15. We conduct these periodic
reviews in order to assess the progress
of the transition and make any
necessary adjustments to the
Commission’s rules and policies to
facilitate the introduction of DTV
service and the recovery of spectrum at
the end of the transition. Here, we
consider how to ensure that
broadcasters complete construction of
their final, post-transition (digital)
facilities by the statutory deadline.
II. Executive Summary
2. In this Third DTV Periodic Review,
we (1) provide a progress report on the
transition; (2) describe the status and
readiness of existing stations to
complete the transition; (3) analyze and
propose the procedures and rule
changes necessary to complete the
transition; and (4) address other issues
related to the transition. Stations that
have not completed construction of
their post-transition channels must
focus their full attention on the
construction efforts necessary to move
from analog to digital transmission no
later than the February 17, 2009
deadline established by Congress.
Specifically, we propose the following
actions to facilitate the transition for
full-power television stations (We note
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37313
that the statutory transition deadline
applies only to full-power stations; see
47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14) and 337(e). We will
address the digital transition for low
power television (‘‘LPTV’’) stations in a
separate proceeding. The Commission
previously determined that it has
discretion under 47 U.S.C. 336(f)(4) to
set the date by which analog operations
of stations in the low power and
translator service must cease.
Accordingly, the Commission decided
not to establish a fixed termination date
for the low power digital television
transition until it resolved the issues
concerning the transition of full-power
television stations):
• We tentatively conclude that
February 17, 2009 will be the
construction deadline for stations that
are building digital facilities based on
their new channel allotments in the new
DTV Table of Allotments (‘‘DTV Table’’)
and accompanying Appendix B (‘‘new
DTV Table Appendix B’’), which will be
established by an order in the
Commission’s DTV proceeding, MB
Docket No. 87–268 (i.e., stations whose
DTV channel for pre-transition
operation is not their channel for posttransition use). The Commission
proposed channel assignments and
reference facilities for stations’ posttransition operations in a 2006 Notice of
Proposed Rule Making in MB Docket
No. 87–268. See Advanced Television
Systems and Their Impact upon the
Existing Television Broadcast Service,
MB Docket No. 87–268, Seventh Further
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 71 FR
66592–01 (Nov. 15, 2006) (‘‘Seventh
FNPRM’’). The Seventh FNPRM sets
forth a channel for each eligible
broadcast TV station in the proposed
new DTV Table. The details of each
station’s channel assignment, including
technical facilities and predicted service
and interference information, are set
forth in the proposed new DTV Table.
[Section V.C.1. and proposed rule 47
CFR 73.624(d)(1)(v)]
• We propose that stations whose
post-transition channel is the same as
their pre-transition DTV channel, who
are not facing unique technical
challenges, and who are granted either
an extension in the Construction
Deadline Extension Order or a waiver in
the Use-or-Lose Order must complete
construction of their DTV facilities by
the deadline established in those orders
(i.e., six months from the release date of
the orders). These stations have had
their post-transition channel
assignments for several years. [Section
V.C.2.]
• We propose that February 17, 2009
will be the construction deadline for
stations facing unique technical
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37314
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
challenges, such as those with sidemounted digital antennas or similar
situations in which the operation of
their analog service prevents the
completion of their full, authorized
digital facilities. [Section V.C.3.]
• We tentatively conclude that
stations that have not completed
construction of full, authorized facilities
on their pre-transition channel may be
excused from completion of
construction if this is not their posttransition channel. Our proposal applies
to stations that have pending
construction permits (‘‘CPs’’), that have
requested CP extensions, that have been
granted CP extensions, that have been
granted waivers of the use-or-lose
deadlines, and that have waivers for
their checklist facility deadline. These
stations will be permitted to carry-over
protection to their full, authorized
facilities. [Section V.C.1.]
• We propose to restrict the situations
in which grants of an extension of time
to construct digital facilities will be
considered for construction deadlines
prior to the end of the transition. In
addition, beginning February 17, 2009,
we propose to apply the existing
‘‘tolling’’ standard applied to analog
stations to requests for additional time
to construct digital facilities and will
toll the construction deadline only in
limited and unavoidable circumstances.
[Section V.C.4. and proposed rule 47
CFR 73.624(d)(3)]
• We propose to require all fullpower television stations to file a form
with the Commission detailing their
current transition status, additional
steps necessary in order to be prepared
for digital-only operation on February
17, 2009, and a timeline for making
those steps. [Section V., paragraph 35]
• We consider whether and, if so,
under what circumstances we should
accept new requests by stations to
return their pre-transition-only DTV
channel (i.e., a DTV channel that is not
their final, post-transition channel)
before the end of the transition and
‘‘flash cut’’ from their analog channel to
their post-transition channel. [Section
V.B.]
• We examine the circumstances in
which a station may be allowed to
reduce or terminate its analog service to
facilitate construction of its final, DTV
facility on its post-transition channel.
[Section V.A.]
• We propose to allow stations to
operate on newly allotted posttransition facilities before the transition
deadline provided they would not
interfere with existing, pre-transition
service. [Section V.C.5.]
• We request comment on additional
proposals to provide stations with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
regulatory flexibility to facilitate
stations’ construction of their posttransition facilities by the statutory
deadline. [Section V.C.6.]
• We propose to offer expedited
processing to a station applying for a CP
to build its post-transition channel,
provided that its application (i) does not
seek to expand the station’s noiselimited service contour in any direction
beyond that established by the new DTV
Table Appendix B; (ii) specifies
facilities that match or closely
approximate those new DTV Table
Appendix B facilities (i.e., if the station
is unable to build precisely the facilities
specified in the new DTV Table
Appendix B, then it must apply for
facilities that deviate no more than five
percent from those new DTV Table
Appendix B facilities with respect to
predicted population); and (iii) is filed
within 45 days of the effective date of
Section 73.616 of the rules adopted in
the Report and Order in this proceeding.
We propose to revise FCC Forms 301
and 340 accordingly. [Section V.D.]
• We tentatively conclude that we
will not accept applications to expand
post-transition facilities until we have
completed processing the applications
to build authorized facilities, but we
seek comment on ways to consider
expansion applications sooner without
delaying the transition. [Section V.E.]
• We tentatively conclude to adopt a
new 0.5 percent interference standard to
apply to maximizations and to new
channel allotments after the transition.
[Section V.F. and proposed rule 47 CFR
73.616]
• We propose to update the
Commission’s rules to reflect any
revisions to the ATSC standards
concerning DTV transmission and PSIP
since the adoption of the Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order. [Sections
V.G.1. and V.G.2. and proposed rule 47
CFR 73.882(d)]
• We seek comment on whether the
Commission can and should revise
Section 73.624(g) to require DTV
stations that are permittees operating
pursuant to a DTV STA or other FCC
authorization for DTV transmission to
file FCC Form 317 and pay fees on any
revenue derived from feeable ancillary
or supplementary services in the same
way required of DTV licensees. [Section
V.G.3.]
• We invite comment on whether
further amendments are needed to the
station identification rules and, in
particular, whether the current rules
provide for appropriate identification of
multicast channels. [Section V.G.4.]
• We invite comment on whether
coordination is needed between
broadcasters and MVPDs to ensure a
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
smooth transition, whether this
coordination is underway, and what
actions the Commission should take to
assist broadcasters with their
coordination efforts. [Section V.G.6.]
III. Background
3. Congress specifically requires the
Commission to evaluate the progress of
the nation’s transition to digital
television. The first DTV periodic
review began in March 2000 and the
second in January 2003. In addition to
these periodic reviews, the Commission
has continued to conduct its DTV
proceeding, through which it has
developed new channel allotments and
assignments. The Commission
established the initial DTV Table of
Allotments in 1997. See Advanced
Television Systems and Their Impact
Upon the Existing Television Broadcast
Service, MM Docket No. 87–268, Sixth
Report and Order, 62 FR 26684–01 (May
14, 1997) (‘‘Sixth Report and Order’’).
The details of each station’s channel
assignment under the initial DTV Table,
including technical facilities and
predicted service and interference
information, were set forth in the initial
Appendix B of the Sixth Report and
Order. The initial Appendix B was
amended in 1998. Simultaneous with
the adoption of the Sixth Report and
Order, the Commission announced DTV
channel assignments for eligible
licensees in the Fifth Report and Order,
62 FR 26966–02 (May 16, 1997), in the
same docket. The Commission recently
issued a Seventh FNPRM in connection
with the DTV proceeding.
4. The Second Periodic Review of the
Commission’s Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 03–15,
Report and Order, 69 FR 59500 (October
4, 2004) (‘‘Second DTV Periodic Report
and Order’’) established a three-round
channel-election process through which
eligible broadcast licensees and
permittees (collectively, ‘‘licensees’’)
selected their post-transition channels
inside the core TV spectrum (i.e.,
channels 2–51). The Commission
received 11 petitions for reconsideration
of the Second DTV Periodic Report and
Order, raising a number of issues, most
of which have been rendered moot by
the completion of the channel election
process . At the start of this process,
licensees proposed their post-transition
facilities. (In November 2004, licensees
filed certifications via FCC Form 381 in
order to define their proposed posttransition facilities. In these
certifications, licensees chose whether
to (1) replicate their allotted facilities,
(2) maximize to their currently
authorized facilities, or (3) reduce to a
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
currently authorized smaller facility.
Stations that did not submit certification
forms by the deadline were evaluated
based on replication facilities.) After
each channel election round, the
Commission announced proposed posttransition channels—called tentative
channel designations (‘‘TCDs’’).
5. The channel election process
culminated in the adoption of the
Seventh FNPRM, which proposed a new
DTV Table. (Comments on the proposed
new DTV Table were due January 25th
and replies were due February 26th.)
The proposed new DTV Table provides
eligible stations with channels for posttransition operations inside the core TV
spectrum. The DTV Table is based on
the TCDs announced for stations, as
well as the Commission’s efforts to
promote overall spectrum efficiency and
ensure that broadcasters provide the
best possible service to the public,
including service to local communities.
The proposed DTV Table will ultimately
replace the current DTV Table. (The
Seventh FNPRM proposes to codify the
new DTV Table in 47 CFR 73.622(i). The
current DTV Table, which is contained
in 47 CFR 73.622(b), will become
obsolete at the end of all authorized
interim DTV operations. The current
NTSC Table, which is contained in 47
CFR 73.606(b), will become obsolete at
the end of the transition, when all fullpower analog operations must cease.)
6. In early 2006, Congress enacted
significant statutory changes to the DTV
transition in the Digital Television and
Public Safety Act of 2005 (‘‘DTV Act’’).
(The DTV Act is Title III of the Deficit
Reduction Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109–
171, 120 Stat. 4 (2006) (‘‘DRA’’), and is
codified at 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14) and
337(e).) Most importantly, it set
February 17, 2009, as the date certain
for the end of the DTV transition, at
which time all full-power television
broadcast stations must cease their
analog transmissions. (The DTV Act
amends 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14)(A) to
establish February 17, 2009 as a new
hard deadline for the end of analog
transmissions by full-power stations and
directs the Commission to ‘‘take such
actions as are necessary (1) to terminate
all licenses for full-power television
stations in the analog television service,
and to require the cessation of
broadcasting by full-power stations in
the analog television service, by
February 18, 2009; and (2) to require by
February 18, 2009, * * * all
broadcasting by full-power stations in
the digital television service, occur only
on channels between channels 2 and 36,
inclusive, or 38 and 51, inclusive
(between frequencies 54 and 698
megahertz, inclusive).’’) The DTV Act
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
does not provide for waivers or
extensions of this deadline for cessation
of analog broadcasts. (Previously, 47
U.S.C. 309(j)(14) provided an exception
to the earlier December 31, 2006
transition deadline if the Commission
determined that less than 85 percent of
the television households in a licensee’s
market were capable of receiving the
signals of DTV broadcast stations
through various means (i.e., via overthe-air reception, cable or satellite, or
digital-to-analog conversion
technology). Congress eliminated the
statutory provisions authorizing marketspecific extensions of the DTV
transition, including the 85 percent
benchmark for DTV reception. This new
hard deadline obviates the need for any
further discussion of how to interpret
and implement the former Section
309(j)(14)(B) of the Act, an issue
previously deferred by the Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order.) The DTV
Act also requires broadcast licensees to
cease operations outside the core
spectrum after February 17, 2009 in
order to make that spectrum available
for public safety and commercial
wireless uses. Full-power TV broadcast
stations must be operating inside the
core TV spectrum and only in digital
upon the end of the transition on
February 17, 2009. (The DTV Act also
created a coupon program to subsidize
the purchase of digital-to-analog (‘‘D-toA’’) converter boxes.)
IV. Progress Report
7. The transition to DTV is a complex
undertaking, affecting virtually every
segment of the television industry and
every American who watches television.
The Commission has been facilitating
the migration to DTV by adopting a
standard for digital broadcasting,
creating an initial DTV Table, awarding
DTV licenses, establishing operating
rules for the new service, monitoring the
physical build-out of DTV broadcast
stations, and helping to educate
consumers about the transition. At the
end of the transition, television
broadcast operations will be limited to
the core TV spectrum, enabling the
recovery of a total of 108 MHz of
spectrum (i.e., TV channels 52–69). (The
core TV spectrum is comprised of lowVHF channels 2 to 4 (54–72 MHz) and
5 to 6 (76–88 MHz), VHF channels 7 to
13 (174–216 MHz) and UHF channels
14–51 (470–698 MHz), but does not
include TV channel 37 (608–614 MHz),
which is used for radio astronomy
research.) Twenty-four megahertz of
spectrum currently used for TV
broadcast channels 63, 64, 68, and 69
have been reallocated for critically
important public safety needs. The
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37315
remaining 84 MHz (currently TV
broadcast channels 52–62 and 65–67)
have been or will be auctioned for new
wireless services. (Channels 60–69
(746–806 MHz) were reallocated for
public safety and wireless
communications services in 1998.
Channels 52–59 were reallocated for
new wireless services in 2001.)
A. Status of DTV Operations
8. In 1997, the Commission granted
eligible licensees a paired channel for
digital operations during the transition
and set dates for construction and
operation of broadcasters’ facilities on
their allotted DTV channels. Pursuant to
the construction schedule set forth in
Section 73.624(d) of the Commission’s
rules, affiliates of the top four networks
in the top ten television markets were
required to complete construction of
their DTV facilities by May 1, 1999; top
four network affiliates in markets 11–30
by November 1, 1999; all remaining
commercial television stations by May
1, 2002; and all noncommercial
educational (‘‘NCE’’) television stations
by May 1, 2003.
9. As of April 2, 2007, 1,702 television
stations in all markets (representing
approximately 98.8 percent of all
stations) have been granted a DTV
construction permit (‘‘CP’’) or license. A
total of 1,603 stations are now
broadcasting a digital signal. Of these,
1,215 stations are authorized with
licensed facilities or program test
authority and 388 stations are operating
pursuant to special temporary authority
(‘‘STA’’) or experimental DTV authority.
10. In the top 30 television markets,
all 119 top-four network-affiliated
television stations are on the air in
digital, 110 with licensed DTV facilities
or program test authority and nine with
STAs. In markets 1–10, all 40 top-four
network affiliated stations are providing
digital service, 38 with licensed DTV
facilities and two with STAs. In markets
11–30, all top-four 79 network affiliated
stations are providing DTV service, 74
with licensed DTV facilities and five
with STAs.
11. Approximately 1,230 commercial
television stations were due to
commence digital broadcasts by May 1,
2002. As of April 2, 2007, 1,136 of these
stations (92.4 percent) are broadcasting
a digital signal. In addition,
approximately 373 NCE television
stations were required to commence
digital operations by May 1, 2003. As of
April 2, 2007, 348 (93.3 percent) of
these stations are broadcasting a digital
signal. (The commercial and NCE TV
stations that have not commenced
digital broadcasts were required to file
a request for extension of additional
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
37316
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
time to complete construction of their
DTV facilities by the deadline
established for them in 47 CFR
73.624(d)(1).)
B. Status of Consumer Capability to
Receive DTV Signals
12. In connection with the 2006
Competition Report, the Commission
requested information about the number
of households relying solely on overthe-air broadcast television for
programming. (The Commission also
sought information about the number of
cable and satellite households that rely
on over-the-air service on one or more
of their television sets not connected to
a multichannel video programming
distributor (‘‘MVPD’’).) In comments
filed to that proceeding, the National
Association of Broadcasters (‘‘NAB’’)
indicated that there are approximately
69 million television sets are not
connected to any MVPD service.
Specifically, NAB reported that nearly
19.6 million households rely solely on
over-the-air broadcast television, and
there are approximately 45.5 million
sets in those homes. NAB states that ‘‘in
these 19.6 million over-the-air
households, there are approximately 1.3
million over-the-air digital sets.’’ Thus,
according to NAB, ‘‘[t]here are roughly
18.7 million over-the-air households
with only analog sets, and these
households have about 44.2 million
analog sets.’’ NAB reports that an
additional 23.5 million television sets in
14.7 million MVPD households remain
unconnected to the MVPD service. NAB
states that this 2006 data showing large
numbers of over-the-air television sets is
consistent with two surveys conducted
in 2005.
13. The demand for DTV sets has
grown with increased availability of
DTV programming and receiving
equipment and a steady drop in the
price of such equipment. The Consumer
Electronics Association (‘‘CEA’’) reports
that the consumer electronics industry
has invested $66.7 billion in DTV
products since 1998. Moreover, CEA
reports more than $75 billion in
consumer investment in DTV products.
According to CEA, 23.9 million DTV
sets and monitors were sold in 2006.
CEA predicts that 29.2 million DTV
products will be sold in 2007, 33.4
million in 2008, 35.2 million in 2009
and 36.4 million in 2010. CEA estimates
that DTV sales will represent 69 percent
of all TV sales in 2006. (CEA projects
that DTV sales will represent 92 percent
of all TV sales in 2007.)
14. In order to promote the
availability of reception equipment and
protect consumers by ensuring that their
television sets continue to work in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
digital world just as they do today, the
Commission established a DTV tuner
mandate, which requires, as of March 1,
2007, that all television receiver
equipment (e.g., TV sets (all sizes),
VCRs, digital video recorders, and any
other TV receiving devices)
manufactured or shipped in interstate
commerce or imported into the United
States, for sale or resale to the public,
must be capable of receiving the signals
of DTV broadcast stations over-the-air.
(In 2002, the Commission initiated the
DTV tuner mandate, with a phase-in
period based on screen size to minimize
the cost impact on consumers. In 2005,
the Commission accelerated the
implementation of the DTV tuner
mandate to become effective on March
1, 2007 and expanded the mandate to
include television sets less than 13
inches.)
15. In addition, subsidized digital-toanalog (‘‘D-to-A’’) converter boxes will
be available to eligible consumers
starting January 2008, further promoting
access to digital reception equipment.
(See Rules to Implement and Administer
a Coupon Program for Digital-to-Analog
Converter Boxes, NTIA Docket No.
0612242667–7051–01, Final Rule, 72 FR
12097 at paragraph 8 (‘‘NTIA Coupon
Program Final Rule’’); 47 CFR 301.
Starting January 1, 2008, all U.S.
households will be eligible to request up
to two $40 coupons to be used toward
the purchase of up to two, D-to-A
converter boxes, while the initial $990
million allocated for the program is
available; 47 CFR 301.3–4. If the initial
funds are used up and the additional
funds (up to $510 million) are
authorized, eligibility for the coupons
will be limited to over-the-air-only
television households. Eligible
consumers will have until March 31,
2009 to make a request for these
coupons.) This subsidy program, which
was created by the DTV Act, will allow
consumers with analog-only TV sets to
receive over-the-air broadcast
programming after the February 17,
2009 transition date, when analog
broadcasting ends. Without a D-to-A
converter box, consumers will not be
able to view full-power TV broadcasts
after the transition date unless they
purchase DTV sets (television sets with
a built-in digital tuner) or subscribe to
a pay television service. Congress
directed the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (‘‘NTIA’’) of the U.S.
Department of Commerce to administer
this subsidy program. (The DTV Act
directs the Assistant Secretary for
Communications and Information to
‘‘implement and administer a program
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
through which households in the
United States may obtain coupons that
can be applied toward the purchase of
digital-to-analog converter boxes.’’ The
purpose of the program is to enable
consumers to continue receiving
broadcast programming over the air
using analog-only televisions not
connected to cable or satellite service.)
In March 2007, NTIA issued final rules
to implement the program, which
subsidizes the purchase of D-to-A
converter boxes.
C. Status of Broadcasters’ Transition
16. Stations are responsible for
meeting the statutory deadline for the
DTV transition. The Commission has no
discretion to waive or change this
transition date. Full-power broadcast
stations not ready to commence digital
operations upon expiration of the
deadline for the transition on February
17, 2009 must go dark and risk losing
their authorizations to operate after the
transition date. (A station failing to meet
its construction deadline may be subject
to license revocation procedures (47
U.S.C. 312), the issuance of forfeitures
(47 U.S.C. 503), or other remedial
measures, such as admonishment. For
example, we remind licensees that ‘‘if a
broadcasting station fails to transmit
broadcast signals for any consecutive
12-month period, then the station
license granted for the operation of that
broadcast station expires at the end of
that period, notwithstanding any
provision, term, or condition of the
license to the contrary;’’ 47 U.S.C.
312(g). If discontinuing operations,
stations must also be mindful of the
Commission’s rules.)
17. We have proposed post-transition
channel assignments for all eligible
stations. (These post-transition channel
assignments largely were based on the
choices made by licensees during the
channel-election process. Eligibility for
a proposed post-transition channel
assignment was limited to existing
Commission licensees and permittees.)
In the proposed new DTV Table, 1,812
stations received proposed posttransition DTV channels. (This total
includes 1,806 stations announced in
Appendix A to the Seventh FNPRM and
six additional stations announced in a
subsequent Public Notice. Additional
new permittees may also be announced
before the transition deadline.) Of these,
1,178 stations received the DTV channel
on which they are currently authorized,
517 stations received the NTSC channel
on which they are currently authorized,
and 117 stations received a different
channel from which they are currently
authorized.
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
18. The process of transitioning the
entire TV broadcast industry to digitalonly operation on each station’s final
channels will be complex. Accordingly,
stations already should be planning
their transition to digital-only service on
their post-transition channel. Some
stations may now be ready, or very close
to ready, to make their transition. We
have provided a list of 752 stations that
we believe fall into this category and
seek input from those stations regarding
our assessment.
19. Most stations, however, will need
to take significant steps to accomplish
their transition. Stations’ situations will
vary based on their final channel
assignments in the new DTV Table and
whether, and if so to what extent, they
must change their transmission facilities
to operate on their post-transition
channels. As described below, stations
may seek to change their antenna or
tower locations. (A station that must
change its DTV tower location may face
a considerable challenge, especially if
the station must construct a new tower.
Such a station must consider whether
there are any existing towers that can be
used or if a new tower must be
constructed. Because of the lead times
involved in purchasing or leasing land
with appropriate FAA clearances, local
and state zoning requirements, and
varying timelines for designing the new
tower, ordering equipment, delivery of
equipment, and construction-related
issues, such a station must begin
planning as soon as possible in order to
transition by the deadline. In some
cases, building a new tower at this stage
in the process may no longer be a viable
option.) Stations may also need to
change their effective radiated power
(ERP), antenna height above average
terrain (HAAT) or antenna pattern as set
forth in the new DTV Table Appendix
B, as adopted.
20. Before discussing the issues that
must be addressed to complete the
transition, we first categorize the
circumstances that stations are in to
describe what stations in each group
must accomplish. First, there are
stations that will remain on their
current DTV in-core channel. Second,
there are stations that will return to
their analog in-core channel. Third,
there are stations that will move to a
completely new in-core channel. In
addition to these three general
categories, stations without a paired
channel (i.e., ‘‘singleton stations’’) that
will ‘‘flash cut’’ from broadcasting on
their analog channel to broadcasting on
a digital channel raise unique issues
that we will consider separately.
(‘‘Singletons’’ or ‘‘single-channel
licensees’’ refers to those licensees that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
do not have a second or ‘‘paired’’
channel to convert to DTV. ‘‘Flash-cut’’
refers to the situation where a station
gives up its pre-transition digital
channel and transitions to digital
service using its analog channel or a
newly allotted channel.) We seek
comment on these categories and
circumstances in general and on the
particular tentative conclusions,
proposals and queries in the Issue
Analysis (section V), below.
1. Category One: Stations Remaining on
Their Current DTV In-Core Channel
21. There are 1,178 stations remaining
on their current DTV in-core channel for
post-transition operations, based on the
proposed new DTV Table. Most of these
stations will have a relatively simple
transition because they already have the
authorizations necessary to operate at
their proposed post-transition facilities
as specified in the proposed new DTV
Table Appendix B. In fact, many of
these stations have already constructed
and received licenses for their posttransition facilities, and so will simply
turn off their analog service to complete
their transition.
22. Some stations in this category,
however, may not have completed their
authorized construction. This would
include a station that has not built
anything and has a CP or extension of
its ‘‘checklist’’ deadline and a station
that has constructed a reduced facility
and is operating pursuant to Special
Temporary Authority (‘‘STA’’). In
addition to turning off their analog
service, these stations may need to make
changes to match their post-transition
facilities as specified in the new DTV
Table Appendix B. The difficulty faced
by these stations will depend on the
type of change and degree of change
required to complete their authorized
construction. (For example, stations in
this category may need to adjust their
transmitter power, their antenna design,
their antenna location, or some
combination thereof. We expect that
relatively minor adjustments to
operating power can be done easily,
perhaps through the use of in-house
engineers. Changes involving more
significant power changes and/or
changes to transmitting antennas may
require more time and effort. For
example, a number of stations currently
have a top-mounted analog antenna and
a side-mounted digital antenna, and to
provide full digital service will need to
re-mount the digital antenna to the top
of the tower. Also, if an entirely new
transmission line and/or antenna must
be installed, additional time will be
needed to order the transmission line
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37317
and antenna and have it delivered to the
site.)
23. Furthermore, some of these
stations may have pending applications
with unresolved international
coordination issues. Licensees in this
category with pending applications
should consult with the Commission
staff about the timing for action on their
applications. In addition, they should
coordinate with Commission staff
regarding necessary modifications to
their applications that will result in
international approval. They may need
to proceed with constructing authorized
facilities to the extent approved by
Canada or Mexico if the issues delaying
action on their applications cannot be
resolved in time to allow construction to
be completed before the end of the
transition. (These stations may be
required to adjust their transmitter
power, their antenna location, their
antenna design, or some combination
thereof.)
2. Category Two: Stations Returning to
Their Analog In-Core Channel
24. There are 517 stations that will
return to their current analog in-core
channel for post-transition operations,
based on the proposed new DTV Table.
(This group of stations includes some
analog singletons and flash-cutters.)
Stations in category two may face each
of the category one challenges involving
tower construction, antenna
replacement or relocation, and
transmitter replacement or power
adjustments.
25. In addition, these stations may
need to determine whether they can use
any of their analog or digital
transmission equipment (e.g.,
transmitter, transmission line or
waveguide, and antenna). If a station
finds it has a transmitter that it could
use, it will also need to determine
whether that transmitter can provide the
appropriate power level. It is our
understanding that a station that is
going to stay within a spectrum band
(low-VHF, high-VHF or UHF) and
change its frequency within 5 or 6
channels (36 MHz or less) will most
likely require fewer technical changes
than if the change of broadcast
frequency is more than 6 channels. We
expect that channel moves of fewer than
5 or 6 channels may require only minor
modifications to the station’s digital
transmitter, whereas more significant
changes may require major
modifications or an entirely new
transmitter. We seek comment on these
assumptions.
26. Stations that will return to their
current analog channel also may need to
determine whether their current analog
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
37318
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
or DTV antenna can be used. Generally,
the design, condition and channel of
operation of their current antennas, as
well as the stations’ directional antenna
characteristics established in the new
DTV Table Appendix B, as adopted,
must be considered when these stations
evaluate the suitability of their antennas
for post-transition DTV operation. The
ability of these stations to use an
existing digital antenna may depend
upon how significant the change in
channel numbers will be for these
stations as they move from their current
DTV channel back to their current
analog in-core channel. It is our
understanding that channel moves of
more than 5 or 6 channels will likely
require a new antenna and transmission
line or new waveguide. We seek
comment on these assumptions.
27. These stations also must consider
the impact on their analog TV service,
which might be disrupted entirely or
limited in reach to a smaller area during
periods of work on the tower. For
example, a temporary reduction in
coverage might be due to reduced power
analog TV operation at a backup site in
order to facilitate construction on the
main tower facility.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
3. Category Three: Stations Moving to a
Completely New In-Core Channel
28. There are 117 stations that will
move to a completely new in-core
channel for post-transition operations,
based on the proposed new DTV Table.
These stations face similar challenges to
those returning to their analog (in-core)
channel. In addition, these stations will
need to coordinate with other stations to
complete their move. For example,
another station may occupy the
relocating station’s post-transition
channel or it may occupy an adjacent
channel (located in the same or a nearby
area) to the relocating station’s posttransition channel. Also, these stations
may find that their tower site cannot
support three antennas at once, as may
be necessary to accommodate their
current analog and DTV operations
while preparing for broadcasting on
their post-transition channel.
4. Singleton Stations
29. There are 137 stations that do not
have a paired channel (i.e., stations that
do not have both an analog and a digital
channel), based on the proposed new
DTV Table. These stations are
commonly referred to as ‘‘singletons.’’
These stations fit in one of the
preceding three categories, but they may
encounter different challenges and
circumstances that deserve special
consideration in this review.
Specifically, for this discussion,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
‘‘singletons’’ include (1) those stations
described in footnote 101 of the Second
DTV Periodic Report and Order as
licensees that did not receive a second
or ‘‘paired’’ channel to use during the
transition to DTV; (2) those stations that
had a paired DTV channel and that we
authorized to discontinue providing
analog TV service; (3) those pairedchannel stations that gave up their
interim DTV channel pursuant to ‘‘flash
cut’’ approval; and (4) those pairedchannel stations that we propose to
allow to ‘‘flash cut.’’ Singletons include
DTV and analog TV stations, and can be
unbuilt, operating at reduced facilities,
or fully constructed and licensed.
Analog TV singletons will be flash
cutting from broadcasting on their
analog channel to broadcasting on a
digital channel. Flash-cutting often will
involve singletons ending their analog
TV operation and beginning their DTV
operation on their current analog
channel, but in some cases will require
that a station change to a new channel
for post-transition operation. Singleton
stations, like those with paired
channels, are responsible to ensure that
they have completed the construction of
their digital facilities by the February
17, 2009 deadline, except for stations
whose initial CPs expire later. (Singlechannel stations receive a CP with a
three-year construction period. Thus,
new stations whose CPs were granted
after February 2006 will have
construction deadlines later than
February 17, 2009.) After February 17,
2009, stations that have not constructed
analog facilities may only construct
digital facilities on their post-transition
channel.
30. Singleton licensees and permittees
should have a post-transition channel in
the proposed new DTV Table and
proposed facilities specified in the
proposed new DTV Table Appendix B,
provided such permittee status is
announced by Public Notice before the
order establishing the new DTV Table is
adopted. DTV singletons remaining on
their current DTV channel for posttransition operations face the same
challenges identified in category one
above. These stations must complete
authorized construction consistent with
the new DTV Table Appendix B, as
adopted. Stations that have done so and
are operating and licensed need not take
any further steps at this time. DTV
singletons that have not completed
construction must do so as discussed
below. A few DTV singletons are
moving to different channels in the new
DTV Table, including some currently
authorized for out-of-core operations. In
addition to the potential challenges
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
described for paired stations going to a
new channel for post-transition
operation (category three in the
preceding section), unbuilt DTV
singletons must complete their required
construction by their CP expiration date,
whether that date is before or after the
transition deadline.
31. Analog singletons that will remain
on their currently authorized channel
for post-transition operations face the
same challenges identified in category
two above. Unbuilt analog singletons
must also meet their CP expiration date
requirements. Depending on the time
left for them to complete construction,
most of these stations should consider
requesting that the Commission modify
their authorization to specify DTV
operation, particularly stations that have
recently received CP grants. (Stations
that receive a new CP and that will
remain on this channel for posttransition operations may either
construct their analog facilities (for use
until the end of the transition) or apply
to the Commission for permission to
construct a digital facility on their
analog channel for post-transition
operations.) Stations in this situation
that choose to construct their authorized
analog broadcast facility for operation
until February 17, 2009 should plan for
its conversion to DTV when they
purchase their transmitter and antenna
system.
32. Analog singletons moving to a
new channel for post-transition
operations face the same issues
identified in category three above. Some
also have a CP for their analog channel
that expires either before or after the
transition deadline. Stations that have
an analog CP expiring before the
transition deadline should consider
applying for a modification of their
analog CP to make it easier to complete
the required analog channel
construction while also building their
post-transition facility. They also should
take steps to efficiently complete this
simultaneous dual-channel construction
of both their pre-transition analog and
post-transition facilities (for example,
having a tower crew install both
antennas at the same time or ordering an
antenna or transmitter that can be
readily converted from analog operation
to DTV operation). They may also want
to explore the possibility of requesting
that their single-channel analog
authorization be modified to specify
pre-transition DTV operation on their
post-transition channel. Such a
modification would require interference
protection to be provided to all
potentially affected stations and
construction to be completed before the
station’s CP expires. Stations whose
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
analog CP will expire after the transition
deadline should consider applying for a
modification of their analog CP to
specify the post-transition facilities that
they will need to complete before their
CP expires. As noted above, February
17, 2009 is the deadline for all fullpower television broadcast stations to
end analog transmissions.
V. Issue Analysis
33. In this Third DTV Periodic
Review, we consider how to ensure that
full-power TV broadcast stations
complete their transition to digital-only
operations by the statutory deadline.
Specifically, we consider when stations
may and must cease operating on their
analog channel, when stations may and
must begin operating on their posttransition channel, and what regulatory
flexibility we can provide to facilitate
these efforts. By statute, stations must
cease analog operations by 11:59 p.m.
on February 17, 2009. Stations, thus,
should have their digital facilities in
place and ready to commence
operations no later than 12 a.m. on
February 18, 2009.
34. We seek comment on what actions
the Commission should take to facilitate
broadcasters’ completion of the
transition by the statutory deadline. We
seek comment on how to ensure that
broadcasters (1) complete construction
of their post-transition facilities in a
timely and efficient manner; and (2)
have in place (in-core) facilities that can
reach their viewers. In view of the
statutory change from a soft to a hard
transition deadline, the Commission’s
focus has moved beyond simply
ensuring that stations are operating in
digital. Our focus is now on overseeing
broadcasters’ construction of their final,
post-transition channel with facilities
that will reach viewers in their
authorized service areas by the time
they must cease broadcasting in analog.
35. We begin by proposing that every
full-power television broadcast station
file a form with the Commission that
details (1) the current status of the
station’s digital transition; (2) the
additional steps, if any, the station
needs to take to be prepared for the
switch-over deadline; and (3) a plan for
how it intends to meet that deadline.
These filings will be posted on the
Commission’s website. We believe that
these forms will assist the Commission,
industry, and the public in assessing
progress and making plans for the
digital switchover date.
36. We also consider when stations
may reduce their current (pre-transition)
television service in order to complete
their transition. Next, we consider the
deadlines by which stations must
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
construct and operate their current DTV
channels or lose interference
protection—or even authority to
operate—on those channels. Third, we
propose deadlines for the construction
and operation of post-transition
facilities and consider the ability of
stations to transition early. We also
consider the steps necessary for
broadcasters to construct and operate
their post-transition channels. Issues
raised in this section include the rules,
procedures and interference standards
for stations to file applications for CPs
to build their post-transition DTV
facilities and to request authorization to
maximize their facilities. Finally, we
address other issues related to the DTV
transition. (While we recognize the
Commission’s rules for full-power
television will need to be updated to
eliminate outdated references to analog
and out-of-core television service and
clarify engineering issues that differ for
digital transmission and analog
transmission, these housekeeping
matters will be addressed in a separate
rulemaking in the DTV proceeding. We,
nonetheless, seek comment on whether
resolution of any housekeeping issues
requires more immediate attention.)
A. Reduction and Termination of
Analog Service
37. In this section, we consider the
reduction and termination of stations’
analog TV service. Until February 17,
2009, the Commission’s rules require
stations to continue operating their
existing licensed analog facilities.
(Moreover, the public has a legitimate
expectation that existing broadcast
services will be maintained.) To best
achieve their respective transitions,
however, some stations may find it
desirable to reduce or terminate their
analog operations before the February
17, 2009 transition date. In some cases,
stations may need to reduce or end their
analog service because such operations
may impede construction and operation
of post-transition (digital) facilities.
Such circumstances may include, but
are not limited to: (1) Stations that
would like to switch their side-mounted
digital antenna with their top-mounted
analog antenna before the end of the
transition; (2) stations that need to add
a third antenna to their tower but cannot
do so without reducing or ending analog
service because the tower cannot
support the additional weight; and (3)
stations that are terminating analog
service early as part of a voluntary bandclearing arrangement. We seek comment
on these and other circumstances where
stations can facilitate their transitions
by reducing or terminating their analog
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37319
service in advance of the transition
deadline.
38. Background. The Commission
generally has not favored reductions in
television service. Proposals that would
result in a loss in TV service have been
considered to be prima facie
inconsistent with the public interest,
and must be supported by a strong
showing of countervailing public
interest benefits. Consistent with this
precedent, the Commission allows
stations to reduce their service from that
required by their licenses only upon an
appropriate public interest showing.
Losses in service may be justified, for
example, to facilitate the station’s
transition to DTV. (The Commission has
placed a very high priority on
accelerating the television industry’s
transition to DTV.) The Commission is
generally most concerned where there is
a loss of an area’s only network or NCE
TV service, or where the loss results in
an area becoming less than well served,
i.e., served by fewer than five full-power
over-the-air signals. In cases in which a
station seeks to reduce analog TV
service, it can also use an engineering
analysis performed in accordance with
the Office of Engineering and
Technology’s OET Bulletin No. 69
(‘‘OET 69’’) methodology to show that
the area where service would be
reduced is area that is already terrain
shielded such that viewers located in
that area do not actually receive the
station’s signal over-the-air now.
39. Notwithstanding the strong public
interest in maintaining TV service, the
Commission does permit the early
return of out-of-core (TV channels 52–
69) analog channels under certain
circumstances in order to facilitate the
DTV transition. The Commission
established policies to facilitate
voluntary ‘‘band-clearing’’ of the 700
MHz bands to allow for the introduction
of new public safety and other wireless
services and to promote the transition of
out-of-core analog TV licensees to DTV
service inside the core TV spectrum.
Generally speaking, these policies
provide that the Commission will
approve voluntary agreements between
incumbent broadcasters and new
licensees to clear the 700 MHz band
early if consistent with the public
interest. The Commission has approved
several such requests to return out-ofcore channels in accordance with this
band-clearing policy.
40. The Commission’s 700 MHz bandclearing policies differ somewhat
depending on whether a station is
located on TV channels 59–69, which
might affect use of the upper portion of
the band, or on TV channels 52–58,
which would only affect use of the
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37320
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
lower portion of the band. Envisioning
the early recovery of TV channels 60–
69, the Commission established a
‘‘rebuttable presumption’’ favoring
requests for voluntary band-clearing
involving channels 59–69. (The
Commission established its policies on
voluntary band-clearing for TV
Channels 59–69 in a series of orders.
The Commission initially stated that it
would ‘‘consider specific regulatory
requests needed to implement voluntary
agreements’’ between incumbent
broadcasters and new licensees to clear
the Upper 700 MHz Band early, if
consistent with public interest. Next,
the Commission established a rebuttable
presumption favoring the grant of
requests that would both result in
certain specific benefits and avoid
specific detriments. These policies were
further extended to ‘‘three-way’’ band
clearing arrangements, in which nonChannel 59–69 broadcasters were also
potential parties. Finally, the
Commission provided certain additional
flexibility to facilitate voluntary
agreements for early clearing and
granted a request for relief from two
specific DTV-related requirements.) In
contrast, the Commission did not
anticipate recovery of TV channels 52–
59 until after the DTV transition was
complete and, as a result, decided to
consider requests for voluntary bandclearing involving those channels on a
case-by-case basis. In this case-by-case
review, the Commission considers
whether grant of the request would
result in public interest benefits, such as
making new or expanded public safety
or other wireless services available to
consumers, especially in rural or other
underserved communities. The
Commission weighs these benefits
against any likely public interest harms,
such as the loss of any of the four
stations with the largest audience share
in the designated market area, the loss
of the sole service licensed to the local
community, the loss of a community’s
sole service on a channel reserved for
NCE TV broadcast service, or a negative
effect on the pace of the DTV transition
in the market.
41. Discussion. In light of the hard
deadline for the cessation of analog TV
service, we believe the most significant
public interest objective should be to
ensure that stations meet the transition
deadline. The original statutory
provision requiring the termination of
analog broadcasts established December
31, 2006 as the last day for analog
operations, but allowed that deadline to
be postponed if an 85 percent DTV
reception benchmark was not reached in
a given market. The Commission’s goal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
under this former approach was to
increase DTV operations as quickly as
possible without causing significant
analog service loss. We believe,
however, that Congress’ adoption of the
hard deadline of February 17, 2009, now
weighs in favor of an increasing
tolerance for the loss of analog service
as we near the switch-over date and
where it will facilitate the transition.
42. Stations with Out-of-Core Analog
Channels. As noted above, stations that
might affect the upper 700 MHz band
(i.e., TV channels 59–69) can receive a
‘‘rebuttable presumption’’ favoring their
requests to terminate analog service. We
believe the disparate band-clearing
treatment with respect to stations in the
lower 700 MHz band (i.e., TV channels
52–58) is no longer appropriate. The
hard deadline applies equally to both
portions of the 700 MHz band. In
addition, Congress has mandated that
the Commission begin the auction of
recovered analog broadcast spectrum in
the 700 MHz band no later than January
28, 2008. (The DTV Act unified the
timing of auctions for the assignment of
remaining spectrum from TV Channels
52–69. The Communications Act now
requires the Commission to commence
the auction of recovered analog
broadcast spectrum no later than
January 28, 2008 and deposit the
proceeds of such auction in the Digital
Television Transition and Public Safety
Fund no later than June 30, 2008.)
Accordingly, we propose to apply the
same ‘‘rebuttable presumption’’
standard to voluntary agreements for
clearing TV channels 52–58 as now
applies to such agreements for clearing
TV channels 59–69. (In other words, we
propose to apply the relaxed ‘‘rebuttable
presumption’’ standard to all out-of-core
stations seeking to return their analog
TV channels.) Moreover, we propose to
apply the relaxed ‘‘rebuttable
presumption’’ to out-of-core stations
seeking to reduce rather than terminate
their analog service. Requests to reduce
or terminate analog service would be
made in accordance with the
Commission’s rules. (Stations making
requests to reduce analog TV service
should do so in accordance with the
rules to modify an existing license or
authorization by using FCC Form 301
(commercial stations) or FCC Form 340
(NCE stations). Stations making requests
to terminate TV service should do so in
accordance with the rules to modify an
existing license or authorization and to
discontinue operations. Stations
discontinuing only one service of their
paired license, however, should not
return their license or authorization, as
would otherwise be required by 47 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
73.1750. In addition, stations making
requests to reduce service may, if more
applicable, instead apply for an STA
pursuant to 47 CFR 73.1635. Consistent
with the rules for license modification
and discontinuance of operation,
stations terminating their service may
send a letter to the Video Division of the
Media Bureau and send an e-mail to
analog@fcc.gov in lieu of filing an
application.) We seek comment on our
proposed treatment of out-of-core
stations seeking to reduce or terminate
their analog service.
43. Stations with In-Core Analog
Channels. In contrast to out-of-core
stations’ return of their analog channels,
in-core stations’ requests to reduce and
terminate analog service have been less
favored to this point. We believe it may
now be appropriate to examine the
circumstances under which we will
allow in-core stations to reduce or
discontinue analog TV broadcasting. We
seek comment on the factors and
circumstances we should consider when
evaluating in-core stations’ requests to
reduce or terminate their analog TV
service before the February 17, 2009
transition date. We invite comment on
ways to ensure that stations meet the
statutory transition deadline, while still
minimizing the loss of TV service to
consumers. If we permit early reduction
or termination of analog service, how do
we ensure that the public continues to
have access to news and information,
including emergency and other public
safety information during the transition?
44. First, with respect to a station
requesting to reduce its analog service—
short of terminating its analog
broadcasting, we seek comment on
whether we should establish a
presumption that any reduction in a
station’s analog TV service is in the
public interest if:
(1) The proposed reduction is directly
related to the construction and
operation of post-transition facilities
and would ensure that the station or
another station can meet the deadline;
(2) The proposed reduction in analog
service is less than five percent of either
the station’s service area or its
population served;
(3) The proposed reduction does not
cause the loss of an area’s only top-four
network or NCE TV service;
(4) The proposed reduction does not
result in an unreasonable reduction in
the number of services available in that
area; (We seek comment on what that
number of services would be. For
example, the Commission has
previously been concerned where the
loss results in an area becoming less
than well served, i.e., with fewer than
five full-power over-the-air signals. In
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
other contexts, such as the satellite
context, we note that the Commission
has considered whether an area would
become ‘‘underserved,’’ i.e., an area
with two or fewer full-service stations.
We propose to allow stations to
minimize the loss of service to their
service area or population and satisfy
this condition through the use of analog
translators. As previously noted, the
statutory deadline applies only to fullpower stations. Stations interested in
the temporary use of analog translators
should file requests for STA in
accordance with 47 CFR 73.1635.);
(5) The broadcast station proposing
the reduction is able to deliver its signal
to cable and satellite providers so that
the reduced analog signal does not
prevent cable and satellite carriage; and
(6) The broadcast station proposing
the reduction commits to on-air
consumer education about the station’s
transition and how to continue viewing
the station.
We seek comment on the usefulness
and timing of this proposal, including
whether there are other factors or
situations where we should presume
that a reduction in service would be, or
would not be, in the public interest. For
example, should we consider the level
of cable and satellite penetration in the
areas that will lose over-the-air service?
We also seek comment on whether and,
if so, how these factors should be
relaxed as we approach the DTV
transition date. As noted above, requests
to reduce analog service would be made
in accordance with the Commission’s
rules.
45. If a station is unable to qualify for
the above proposed presumption, we
propose to consider the station’s request
to reduce analog TV service (on an incore channel) on a case-by-case basis.
We invite comment on the appropriate
showing and balancing of factors to
consider in such a case-by-case analysis.
As above, we seek comment on whether
we should permit an increasing amount
of analog TV service loss the closer we
get to the end of the transition. What
information must stations provide to
demonstrate that reduced analog service
would be in the public interest? We
would expect that our case-by-case
analysis would involve consideration of
the factors discussed above. For
example, we believe that broadcasters
must be able to deliver their signals to
cable and satellite providers so that
reduced analog signals do not prevent
cable and satellite carriage. In addition,
we believe that broadcasters must also
commit to on-air consumer education
about the station’s transition and how to
continue viewing the station. We seek
comment on these proposals.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
46. Some broadcasters have sidemounted antennas and similar problems
that prevent them from completing the
build-out of their digital facilities while
they are still operating their full analog
facilities. Such stations, if they are
providing DTV service to 100 percent of
their replication area, may want to wait
until February 17, 2009 to move their
digital antenna into its final position.
This approach may be acceptable
provided there is a minimal disruption
of service after the deadline due to postdeadline construction activities. We
seek comment on this approach and
urge each station operating under these
circumstances to consider how much of
their replicated area is served by their
side-mounted digital antenna. It is
critically important that analog over-theair viewers who obtain the necessary
digital receivers (whether TV sets or Dto-A converters) are able to receive DTV
service over-the-air upon expiration of
the deadline for the transition on
February 17, 2009. If it is necessary for
stations to reduce analog service before
the transition to be sure all viewers have
digital service on and after the transition
date, we will consider such requests.
47. With respect to a station
requesting to terminate its analog TV
service on an in-core channel, we seek
comment on whether and, if so, under
what conditions we would permit such
an action. We would expect to apply a
stricter standard to the early termination
of analog in-core service than to a
reduction in service. We believe our
analysis of requests to terminate analog
service would at least involve
consideration of the relevant factors
discussed above for a reduction of
service. We seek comment on this
proposal, and also on whether we
should require a station requesting
termination of analog in-core service to
demonstrate that a reduction in service
is an unacceptable alternative. As noted
above, requests to terminate in-core
analog service would be made in
accordance with the Commission’s
rules.
B. Return of Pre-Transition DTV
Channel; Flash Cut Requests
48. In this section, we consider
whether and, if so, when to allow
additional stations to return their pretransition-only DTV channel (i.e., a DTV
channel that is not their final, posttransition channel) and flash cut at or
before the transition deadline from their
current analog channel to their posttransition channel. The Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order permitted
stations in certain situations to
surrender their pre-transition DTV
channel, operate in analog on their
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37321
analog channel, and then flash cut to
digital by the end of the transition on
their post-transition channel. As the
Commission noted, the potential public
interest benefits of flash cuts include
freeing the station to focus its efforts on
completion of its post-transition
channel and the creation of
opportunities for the provision of public
safety and other wireless services on the
pre-transition DTV channel. Based on
the criteria established in the Second
DTV Periodic Report and Order, the
Media Bureau has approved the flash
cut requests of numerous stations. In
this Third DTV Periodic Review, we
consider expanding the range of
circumstances in which we will allow
stations to flash cut.
49. Background. In the Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order, the
Commission permitted satellite stations
to flash cut because of their unique
status and circumstances and provided
for these stations to notify the
Commission of their decision to flash
cut by their initial channel election
deadline. (TV satellite stations are fullpower broadcast stations authorized
under Part 73 of the Commission’s rules
to retransmit all or part of the
programming of a parent station that is
typically commonly owned. Unlike fullservice stations, satellite stations have
chosen to forego or relinquish fullservice status and instead retransmit the
programming of a parent station because
full-service operation of the satellite
facility is not economically viable.
Eligible satellite stations were assigned
a paired DTV channel in the current
DTV Table. The Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order recognized that most
satellite stations operate in small or
sparsely populated areas that have an
insufficient economic base to support
full-service operations.) The
Commission stated that satellite stations
opting to flash cut would retain their
interference protection (defined in the
proposed new DTV Table Appendix B)
as if they had met the applicable
replication/maximization build-out
requirements.
50. The Commission also permitted
stations with out-of-core DTV channels
to flash-cut under certain conditions
and required notification of their
decision to flash cut by their initial
channel election deadline. The
Commission presumed that granting
such requests would be in the public
interest if the station demonstrated that
(1) it was assigned an out-of-core DTV
channel, and (2) grant of the request
would not result in the loss of a DTV
channel affiliated with one of the four
largest national television networks
(ABC, CBS, NBC, or Fox). (The
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37322
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Commission has ‘‘relied on affiliates of
the four largest national television
networks to achieve the necessary
milestones throughout the DTV
transition.’’ The Commission also noted
that the presumption is neither
conclusive nor dispositive and that
special circumstances raised by the
resulting loss of digital broadcast service
could rebut the presumption.) In the
case of requests that did not meet these
criteria, the Commission stated that it
would consider all the relevant public
interest factors in deciding whether to
approve the request. These factors
include the advancement of the
provision of wireless and public safety
services, the acceleration of the DTV
transition, and the loss of broadcast
service. Like satellite stations, fullservice out-of-core stations that are
permitted to flash cut would retain their
interference protection (defined in the
new DTV Table Appendix B, as
adopted) as if they had met the
applicable replication/maximization
build-out requirements. The
Commission also stated in the Second
DTV Periodic Report and Order that
stations would not be eligible to flash
cut if they ‘‘have been denied an
extension of the construction
requirements and admonished because
they failed to demonstrate that they are
meeting the necessary criteria for an
extension and have not come into
compliance.’’
51. The Media Bureau recently
approved by Public Notice the flash cut
requests of 32 stations based on the
criteria established in the Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order. These
stations were approved to turn off or
discontinue construction of their pretransition DTV channel. In addition, the
Public Notice invited any other station
to flash cut if it meets the criteria
established in the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order.
52. Discussion. We seek comment on
whether and, if so, under what
circumstances we should accept new
requests by stations to return their pretransition DTV channel before the end
of the transition and ‘‘flash cut’’ from
their analog channel to their posttransition channel (which must be
different from their pre-transition DTV
channel). (Stations may continue to
obtain flash cut approval pursuant to
the Second DTV Periodic Report and
Order and Flash Cut PN.) For instance,
we seek comment on the following
factors: (1) Whether the DTV station is
operating on TV channels 52–69; (2)
whether the station is affiliated with one
of the four largest national television
networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, or Fox); (3)
whether the station’s pre-transition DTV
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
channel is allotted to another station for
post-transition use and the station’s
return of the channel will facilitate the
other station’s construction of its posttransition digital facility; and (4) the
station’s financial hardship. We invite
comment on these criteria and on other
criteria that may be relevant. We
encourage commenters to address the
public’s desire to continue to receive
DTV signals that are currently available
and the impact that allowing stations to
turn off pre-transition DTV signals
would have on the successful and
timely completion of the transition. We
also seek comment on the impact of this
proposal on cable and satellite
subscribers. Consistent with the
decision in the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order, stations that have
been admonished by the Commission
for failure to meet their construction
deadline would not qualify to flash cut.
C. Construction Deadline for Full,
Authorized DTV Facilities
53. In light of the short amount of
time remaining before the transition
deadline, it is critical that stations
finalize construction of their posttransition facilities expeditiously to
ensure the provision of TV broadcast
service to the public when analog
transmissions cease. In this section, we
consider whether to require stations to
continue construction of pre-transition
channels that are not going to be used
by the station after the transition. We
also consider the deadline by which we
will require TV broadcast stations to
complete construction of their posttransition facilities.
54. As discussed below, we are
proposing to adopt a different approach
for the remainder of the transition with
respect to deadlines for construction of
DTV facilities and interference
protection. Until now, a primary focus
of the Commission has been to facilitate
the initiation of DTV service to the
public during the transition. This
approach was designed, in part, to
accomplish the goal of completing the
transition by the December 31, 2006
‘‘flexible’’ deadline originally
established by Congress, which allowed
for exceptions to the deadline. (Guided
by this statutory directive, the
Commission established construction
deadlines and ‘‘use or lose’’ policies that
provided incentives to stations to
provide DTV service during the
transition, which in turn gave viewers
an incentive to purchase equipment that
would enable them to view these
signals.) Now that Congress has
established a ‘‘hard’’ deadline for
completion of the transition, with no
exceptions, we believe our emphasis
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
should shift toward ensuring that DTV
stations will be providing service on
their final, post-transition channels by
that date. In general, we now must focus
on striking the appropriate balance
between the public interest in assuring
that post-transition channels are fully
constructed by February 17, 2009, and
the public interest in pre-transition
digital and analog service. These, like
other issues raised in this NPRM,
require careful self-assessment by
licensees to determine how best to serve
the public while at the same time
making efficient use of the resources
available (manufacturing capacity,
tower crews, etc.) available to them.
55. Previous Construction Deadlines
and Use or Lose Policies. As discussed
above, the DTV construction schedule
adopted by the Commission in 1997,
provided for varying construction
deadlines based on the size of the
market and type of station, with all
stations required to construct by May 1,
2003. (Under this schedule, television
stations in the 10 largest TV markets
and affiliated with the top four
television networks (ABC, CBS, Fox,
and NBC) were required to build DTV
facilities by May 1, 1999. Stations
affiliated with those networks in
television markets 11 through 30 were
required to construct their DTV facilities
by November 1, 1999. All other
commercial stations were required to
construct their DTV facilities by May 1,
2002, and all noncommercial stations
were to have constructed their DTV
facilities by May 1, 2003.) In 2004, the
Commission established two deadlines
by which stations were expected to
either replicate or maximize DTV
service on their current (pre-transition)
DTV channel or lose interference
protection to the unserved areas on that
channel. By July 1, 2005, top-four
network affiliates in the top 100 markets
were required to fully replicate or
maximize if they will remain on their
DTV channel after the transition. If
these stations will move to another
channel post-transition, they were
required to serve at least 100 percent of
their replication service population by
July 1, 2005. By July 1, 2006, all other
stations were required to fully replicate
and maximize if they will remain on
their current DTV channel after the
transition. If they will move to another
channel post-transition, they were
required to serve at least 80 percent of
their replication service population by
July 1, 2006. The Commission stated
that stations that met the applicable
‘‘use-or-lose’’ deadline and that are
going to move to a different channel
after the transition would be permitted
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
to carry over their authorized
maximized areas to their new channels.
In addition, these ‘‘use-or-lose’’
replication/maximization deadlines
became the new deadlines for stations
operating temporary DTV facilities
pursuant to STA to complete
construction of their licensed DTV
facilities. (In 2001, the Commission
temporarily deferred (until the Second
DTV Periodic Review) the establishment
of construction deadlines for these
stations, provided they constructed
initial DTV facilities designed to serve
at least their communities of license.)
Approximately 80 percent of the
stations in each of these categories met
their respective deadlines.
56. In the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order, the Commission
noted that certain stations had not yet
been granted an initial DTV
construction permit. The Commission
required that, by August 4, 2005, all
such stations construct and operate
‘‘checklist’’ facilities that conform to the
parameters of the DTV Table and other
key processing requirements. The
Commission stated that it would
consider requests for waiver of the
August 4, 2005 deadline on a case-bycase basis, using the criteria for
extension of DTV construction
deadlines. (‘‘Checklist’’ facilities have
power and antenna height equal to or
less than those specified in the DTV
Table and are located within a specified
minimum distance from the reference
coordinates specified in the DTV Table.
Because these facilities comply with the
interference requirements specified in
the rules, no further consideration of
interference is required. In addition,
because the DTV Table has been
coordinated with Canada and Mexico,
‘‘checklist’’ facilities generally do not
require further international
coordination.)
57. In two separate orders adopted
subsequent to the adoption of this
NPRM, the Commission addressed
applications filed by stations for
extensions of time to construct DTV
facilities and/or waivers of the deadline
by which stations must build DTV
facilities in order to retain the ability to
carry over interference protection to
their post-transition channel (so-called
‘‘use or lose’’ waivers). In the
Construction Deadline Extension Order,
the Commission considered 145
requests for an extension of time to
construct a DTV facility. For 107
stations whose pre-transition DTV
channel is the same as their posttransition channel, the Commission
granted these applications and gave
these stations an additional six months
from the release date of the Construction
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Deadline Extension Order in which to
complete construction. For 29 stations
whose pre-transition DTV channel is
different from their post-transition
channel, the Commission granted these
applications and gave these stations
until 30 days after the effective date of
the amendments to Section 73.624(d) of
the rules adopted in the Report and
Order in this Third DTV Periodic
Review proceeding in which to
complete construction. In the Use or
Lose Order, the Commission considered
192 requests for waiver of the ‘‘use or
lose’’ deadlines. For 102 stations whose
pre-transition DTV channel is the same
as the station’s post-transition DTV
channel, the Commission granted these
stations a waiver and gave them an
additional six months from the release
date of the Use or Lose Order in which
to complete construction. For 38
stations whose pre-transition DTV
channel is different from the station’s
post-transition channel, the Commission
granted these stations a waiver and gave
them until 30 days after the effective
date of the amendments to Section
73.624(d) of the rules adopted in the
Report and Order in this Third DTV
Periodic Review proceeding in which to
complete construction. In both of these
orders, the Commission reminded
stations that the hard deadline for
termination of analog TV service
prevents consideration of any request
for extension of full-power analog TV
service beyond that date. The
Commission advised stations given an
extension or waiver to utilize this time
to take all steps possible to complete
construction as further extension or
waiver requests may be evaluated under
a more stringent standard. We intend to
treat similarly any stations that have a
construction permit for which the
original time to complete construction
has not yet expired. These stations still
have time remaining on their original
construction permit to complete the
build-out of their pre-transition DTV
facilities or they may have had their
original construction permit extended
and the extended deadline has not yet
expired. Thus, these stations are not
addressed in the Construction Deadline
Extension Order or Use-or-Lose Order.
These stations should continue to
follow existing rules and procedures
(i.e., continue to build their current DTV
CP and, if that CP expires before they
have completed construction, file a
request for extension of the CP). Once
final rules are adopted in this
proceeding and become effective,
stations will be subject to the new rules,
including changes to Section 73.624(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37323
58. Revised Construction Deadlines
and Use or Lose Policy. Going forward,
we propose to establish construction
deadlines for DTV facilities that vary
based on a station’s channel
assignments for pre- and post-transition
operation and other circumstances
affecting the station’s ability to complete
final, post-transition facilities. We
believe this revised approach will best
permit stations to focus their efforts on
completing construction of final, posttransition facilities in the time
remaining before the end of the
transition. In conjunction with this
approach, we propose to tighten the
standard by which we evaluate future
requests for extension of time to
construct a DTV facility. In addition,
with respect to construction deadlines
of February 17, 2009 or later, we
propose to evaluate all requests for
additional time to construct under the
‘‘tolling’’ standard currently applied to
analog broadcast TV stations and DTV
singleton stations.
59. In this section, we consider
construction deadlines for differently
situated stations. First, we consider
stations whose post-transition channel
is different from their pre-transition
DTV channel. These are stations that
will be starting over with a new channel
for DTV service. Second, we consider
stations whose post-transition channel
is the same as their pre-transition DTV
channel. Unlike the first group, these
are stations that have long been assigned
the channel that they will use for posttransition operations. Third, we
consider stations in other situations,
including those facing unique technical
challenges. Finally, we consider
alternatives that might afford stations
with regulatory flexibility. We seek
comment on the proposed deadlines
and tentative conclusions below, and
also seek comment on alternative
deadlines for these stations.
1. Stations Whose Post-Transition
Channel is Different From Their PreTransition DTV Channel
60. For stations whose pre-transition
DTV channel is different from their
post-transition channel, we propose not
to require further construction of their
pre-transition DTV channel and propose
to establish February 17, 2009 as the
deadline by which these stations must
complete their final, post-transition
facilities. These stations face a greater
challenge than stations that will remain
on the same DTV channel for posttransition operations. Stations moving
to a new channel must apply for a
construction permit on that channel and
build new facilities based on the
channel allotments in the new DTV
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37324
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Table Appendix B, as adopted. Our
proposal is designed to give stations
facing the challenges associated with
moving to a new DTV channel the
maximum possible time to complete
their post-transition facilities before
analog transmissions must cease. We
seek comment on this approach, and on
whether an earlier construction date
would still be appropriate in some
circumstances.
61. With the establishment of the hard
deadline, we believe the focus must turn
to facilitating stations’ efforts to
construct their permanent DTV facilities
that will be used to provide service after
the transition. Therefore, at this stage in
the DTV transition, we propose to allow
a station to terminate further
construction of its pre-transition DTV
channel if this channel is not the
station’s post-transition channel. We
request comment on this proposal. We
believe that requiring stations to build
or expand facilities that would only be
operated until the end of the
transition—i.e., for less than two years—
potentially could undermine the larger
public interest objective of ensuring a
timely transition to digital broadcasting
by diverting limited resources from
what is a far more important goal: The
construction of final, post-transition
facilities.
62. At the same time, however, we
recognize that many stations whose pretransition DTV channels are not the
channels they will operate on posttransition have been diligent in meeting
the deadlines established by the
Commission for completing
construction of their pre-transition
facilities in order to provide DTV
service to the public and to be permitted
to carry over interference protection to
their permanent DTV channel. It is not
our intent to treat these stations unfairly
or reward stations that have been less
diligent in providing DTV service
during the transition. However, as noted
above, it is critical at this juncture to
focus on the completion of final DTV
facilities. In order to accomplish this
goal, we believe we must permit stations
to cease investing time and resources in
completing facilities that will be used
for the remainder of the transition
simply in order to retain interference
protection on their final, post-transition
channels. Instead, we need to ensure
that stations are focused on finalizing
their post-transition facilities now to
ensure service to the public when
analog transmissions cease.
63. Accordingly, we propose to
change our ‘‘use or lose’’ policy for
stations whose pre-transition DTV
channel is not their post-transition
channel as follows. For such stations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
that received either an extension of their
construction deadline in the
Construction Deadline Extension Order
or a waiver of their use-or-lose deadline
in the Use or Lose Order (i.e., until 30
days after the effective date of the
amendments to Section 73.624(d) of the
rules adopted in the Report and Order
in this Third DTV Periodic Review
proceeding), we propose that these
stations will not lose protection to their
post-transition channels. We note that
many stations that have not built their
transitional facilities have faced
recognizable impediments to doing so.
In addition, most of these stations that
have applied for an extension of time to
construct and/or a waiver of the
applicable use-or-lose deadline have
had those requests granted, indicating
that they were found to have a valid
reason not to have met the applicable
deadline. Thus, we do not believe that
allowing stations that faced such
impediments to retain interference
protection on their final, post-transition
facility unfairly rewards these stations.
We seek comment on this approach. We
specifically invite comment on the
effect of this proposal on stations
moving to a different DTV channel for
post-transition operations that have
fully complied with their use-or-lose
deadlines and construction permit
build-out requirements.
64. Under our proposal here, stations
with a pre-transition DTV channel that
is not the same as their final, posttransition channel have the following
options. We request comment on our
proposal, discussed below.
65. Pre-Transition DTV Channel
Unbuilt or Not in Operation. We
propose to permit a station that has not
constructed an operational pretransition DTV facility to elect simply to
return its CP for that facility to the
Commission and focus its efforts on
construction of its post-transition
facility. Thus, a station that has either
not begun construction of its pretransition DTV facility or has not begun
operating that facility, and will be
moving to a different channel at the end
of the transition, may return the CP for
that facility to the Commission. As
stations in this situation are not
currently providing digital service to the
public, we believe it is appropriate at
this stage in the transition to allow these
channels to be returned. We request
comment on this approach. Stations
electing this option would be required
to obtain flash cut approval in
accordance with the proposals
discussed in section V.B., supra.
Stations electing this approach would
be able to carry over interference
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
protection to their post-transition
channel, as noted above.
66. Pre-Transition DTV Channel in
Operation. Stations with operational
DTV facilities on a pre-transition
channel may have several options.
Under each of these options, we propose
to permit a station to carry over
interference protection to its posttransition channel, as noted above.
• First, stations may discontinue
further construction on their pretransition DTV facility and to operate
the facility they have constructed at this
point during the remainder of the
transition while they focus on
construction of their permanent DTV
facility. We propose to permit these
stations to file an application to modify
their existing CP to match their pretransition DTV facility in accordance
with the Commission’s rules. The
station would then continue operation
of the facility for the remainder of the
transition without devoting resources to
further build-out of that facility.
67. Second, stations may be permitted
to cease operating their pre-transition
DTV facility in certain circumstances.
We propose that these stations must
obtain flash cut approval in accordance
with the proposals discussed in section
V.B., supra.
• Third, stations may decide they
would like to continue construction of
their full, authorized DTV facility on
their pre-transition channel. While we
do not want to deny stations in this
third category the opportunity to
continue to build pre-transition DTV
facilities and to provide service on these
facilities for the remainder of the
transition, we believe it is appropriate to
require that these facilities be completed
expeditiously. Accordingly, for stations
in this third category, we propose to
permit the station to continue to build
its pre-transition DTV facility, but will
require that construction be completed
by the deadline established for them in
the Construction Deadline Extension
Order or in the Use or Lose Order (i.e.,
30 days after the effective date of the
amendments to Section 73.624(d) of the
rules adopted in the Report and Order
in this Third DTV Periodic Review
proceeding).
2. Stations Whose Post-Transition
Channel Is the Same as Their PreTransition DTV Channel
68. Many stations whose pretransition DTV channel is the same as
their post-transition channel have
already made substantial progress
toward construction of facilities that
will be used to provide service after the
transition. Specifically, they have
already constructed their full,
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
authorized DTV facilities in accordance
with their existing CP or license and the
Commission’s previous build-out
requirements established in the Second
DTV Periodic Report and Order. Some
of these stations have built DTV
facilities that match those defined in the
proposed new DTV Table Appendix B
and are, therefore, now ready for posttransition operations. (We remind
stations of their continuing obligation to
notify the Commission concerning
changes in their facilities. Stations are
expected to comply with the rules and
may refer to adjustments in their
facilities as described in the new DTV
Table in their comments in this docket.
To the extent that stations still need to
modify their authorization, we propose
to require them to file an application, as
discussed below in section V.D. In
addition, as we propose below,
applications that match or closely
approximate but do not exceed their
new DTV Table facilities will be eligible
for expedited processing.) Other stations
whose pre-transition DTV channel is the
same as their post-transition channel
have built their full, authorized DTV
facilities in accordance with their
existing CP or license but for some
reason these facilities do not match
those facilities defined in the proposed
new DTV Table Appendix B. (Stations
may have certified facilities that were
authorized by CPs they have not yet
constructed, or that they requested in
pending applications that have been
held up by international coordination
issues, or that are based on replication
that their current CP or license does not
exactly achieve. Stations may also have
modified their CP or license since they
filed their certification so that their
currently authorized coverage no longer
provides an exact match to their
certified coverage.) These stations will
need to file an application for a new CP
or an application for modification of CP
to change their facilities to match those
facilities defined in the new DTV Table
Appendix B, as adopted. We discuss
below, in section V.D., the process by
which stations must file such
applications.
69. Other stations with the same preand post-transition DTV channel have
not yet constructed their full, authorized
DTV facilities. Some of these stations
currently have a CP for their full,
authorized DTV facility, some are
operating reduced facilities pursuant to
an STA, and some may not have
constructed at all. These stations must
complete construction and, in some
cases, may have to apply for a new CP
or for modification of their CP to receive
authorization for facilities that match
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
the facilities defined in the new DTV
Table Appendix B, as adopted.
70. It is possible that a station with
the same pre- and post-transition
channel does not want to complete
construction of its full, authorized
facilities as described in the new DTV
Table Appendix B. These stations must
apply to modify their existing CP or
license to reflect the facility they intend
to construct or have constructed.
71. For stations whose post-transition
channel is the same as their pretransition DTV channel, we propose that
the deadline to complete construction of
their final, DTV facility is the deadline
established for them in the Construction
Deadline Extension Order or Use or Lose
Order (i.e., six months from the release
date of those orders). For these stations,
we believe it is appropriate to require
that they complete construction of their
final DTV facility by this deadline
because they have already had a
significant period of time in which to
build their post-transition facilities and,
indeed, should already have these
facilities constructed. Unlike stations
that will be moving to a different DTV
channel for post-transition use, these
stations have generally had the
advantage of being able to plan for and
commence construction of their posttransition facilities for more than 10
years. In contrast, stations moving to a
different channel for post-transition
operations have only recently been
assigned their new channel and thus are
only now able to apply for a
construction permit for this channel and
commence construction of their posttransition facilities.
72. We invite comment on this
approach. In particular, we invite
comment on whether there are stations
in this group that must apply for a new
or modified CP because their current CP
does not match the facilities specified in
the proposed new DTV Table Appendix
B. Are the changes in the CP such that
little, if any, of the equipment necessary
for the facility for which they currently
have a CP could be used in the facility
specified in the new DTV Table
Appendix B, as adopted? If we were to
give these stations more time to
construct, should we do so only where
the difference between the facilities
specified on the current CP and those
defined in the proposed new DTV Table
Appendix B is significant? If so, how
should we define a ‘‘significant’’
difference in this context?
3. Other Situations
73. In this section, we separately
discuss the proposed treatment of
stations with side-mounted digital
antennas or facing other circumstances
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37325
whereby the operation of the station’s
analog service prevents the completion
of the station’s full, authorized posttransition facility as defined in the
proposed new DTV Table Appendix B.
We also discuss the treatment of stations
granted a waiver of the August 4, 2005
‘‘checklist’’ deadline and stations
denied an extension of time to construct
a pre-transition DTV facility or a ‘‘use or
lose’’ waiver request.
74. Stations Facing Unique Technical
Challenges. In the Construction
Deadline Extension Order, the
Commission granted the extension
applications of four stations because
these stations faced unique technical
challenges (e.g., side-mounted antennarelated issues) preventing them from
completing construction of their DTV
facilities. Most of these stations
proposed to install their DTV antenna
on the top of the tower where their
existing analog antenna currently is
housed. In order to top-mount the DTV
antenna, these stations would have to
relocate the analog antenna to another
position on the existing tower or to
another location altogether. These
stations were granted an extension until
February 17, 2009 to complete
construction of their DTV facilities.
Similarly, in the Use or Lose Order, the
Commission identified 45 stations that
have come close to meeting the
applicable replication or maximization
requirements but cannot fully satisfy
those requirements because of unique
technical challenges associated with
operation of their analog, as well as
construction of their digital, facilities.
Some of the stations in this latter group
are stations with top-mounted antenna
issues; others include stations whose
local power company cannot provide
sufficient electrical capacity to the
tower site to power both analog and full
power digital operations, and stations
that do not have space at their antenna
site for both analog and digital
equipment. These stations were granted
a similar waiver of the ‘‘use or lose’’
deadline.
75. For the 49 stations referenced
above that were granted an extension
request or ‘‘use-or-lose’’ waiver because
they faced unique technical challenges,
we propose that the deadline for these
stations to complete construction of
their final, DTV facility is the deadline
established for them in the Construction
Deadline Extension Order or Use or Lose
Order (i.e., February 17, 2009). In
general, we established pre-transition
DTV construction deadlines, and have
proposed post-transition construction
deadlines herein, based on whether a
particular station was going to use its
pre-transition DTV channel for post-
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37326
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
transition operations. However, in the
Construction Deadline Extension Order
or Use or Lose Order, we did not rely
on this distinction because stations with
a top-mounted antenna issue face a
unique and insurmountable impediment
to construction (i.e., they cannot put
both an analog and a DTV antenna on
top of the same tower). Accordingly, we
propose to give all such stations until
February 17, 2009 to complete their
final, post-transition facilities. We also
anticipate that these stations will take
advantage of approaches proposed
herein in the section concerning
reduction in analog service prior to the
end of the transition to facilitate
construction of final, DTV facilities. We
seek comment on this approach.
76. Stations Granted Waivers of the
‘‘Checklist’’ Deadline. In the Use or Lose
Order, the Commission granted 10
requests for waiver of the August 4,
2005 deadline established for all
television stations to construct and
operate a ‘‘checklist’’ DTV facility. For
four of these stations whose pretransition DTV channel is the same as
their post-transition channel, the
Commission granted these stations a
‘‘checklist’’ waiver and gave them an
additional six months from the release
date of the Use or Lose Order in which
to complete construction and begin
operation of their ‘‘checklist’’ facilities.
For six of these stations whose pretransition DTV channel is different from
their post-transition channel, the
Commission granted these stations a
‘‘checklist’’ waiver and gave them until
30 days after the effective date of the
amendments to Section 73.624(d) of the
rules adopted in the Report and Order
in this Third DTV Periodic Review
proceeding in which to complete
construction and begin operation of
their ‘‘checklist’’ facilities.
77. We propose for these stations an
approach dependent upon whether their
pre-transition DTV channel is the same
as, or different than, their posttransition channel. For the six stations
granted ‘‘checklist’’ waivers whose pretransition DTV channel is different than
their post-transition channel, we
propose to apply the procedures
outlined at section V.C.1., supra, for
stations that are moving to a different
channel post-transition. Thus, for these
stations we propose not to require
further construction of their pretransition DTV facility and propose to
establish February 17, 2009 as the
deadline by which these stations must
complete their final, post-transition
facilities. (In the Use or Lose Order,
these stations were granted a waiver of
the ‘‘checklist’’ deadline until 30 days
after the effective date of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
amendments to Section 73.624(d) of the
rules adopted in the Report and Order
in this Third DTV Periodic Review
proceeding.) These stations may cease
further construction of their pretransition facility. They may decide to
operate the facilities they have
constructed on their pre-transition
channel for the remainder of the
transition and, if so, they should apply
to license those facilities and, if they do
so, they would not be required to
request further extensions of time to
construct in order to retain full
interference protection to their posttransition DTV channel. Alternatively,
these stations could elect to pursue the
options outlined in section V.A., supra,
concerning reduction in analog service
prior to the end of the transition. For the
four stations granted ‘‘checklist’’
waivers whose pre-transition DTV
channel is the same as their posttransition channel, we propose to apply
the procedures outlined above at section
V.C.2., supra, for stations with the same
pre- and post-transition channels. Thus,
these stations must complete their full,
final post-transition facility by the
deadline established in the Use or Lose
Order (i.e., six months from the release
date of the Use or Lose Order). Any
request for extension of time to
construct beyond that date will be
considered under the stricter extension
criteria proposed herein. We invite
comment on these proposals.
78. Stations Denied An Extension of
Time to Construct. In the Construction
Deadline Extension Order, the
Commission denied the extension
applications of five stations,
admonishing three of these stations for
their continuing failure to timely
construct and affording these stations
additional time to comply with the DTV
construction rule. The one admonished
station whose pre-transition DTV
channel is the same as its post-transition
channel was afforded six months from
the release date of the Order to comply
with the DTV construction rule, while
the two admonished stations whose pretransition DTV channel is different from
their post-transition channel were
afforded until 30 days after the effective
date of the amendments to Section
73.624(d) of the rules adopted in the
Report and Order in this Third DTV
Periodic Review proceeding. All three
admonished stations were also made
subject to the remedial measures for
DTV construction adopted by the
Commission. For these admonished
stations, we propose that we will not
consider any future requests for
extension of time to construct pretransition facilities. We note that the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Construction Deadline Extension Order
admonished these stations and
subjected them to remedial measures
and noted that the stations could be
subject to additional sanctions if they do
not comply with the measures and
requirements set forth in that Order. In
that regard, we propose that for the
station who was admonished and whose
pre-transition DTV channel is the same
as its final, post-transition channel, if
such station does not complete
construction of its DTV facility by the
deadline established in the Construction
Deadline Extension Order, the station
would be subject to additional remedial
measures, such as but not limited to the
loss of its pre-transition channel, the
loss of its ability to carry over to its
post-transition channel interference
protection for the area unserved by its
pre-transition facility, and the issuance
of forfeitures. For the other two
admonished stations, whose pretransition DTV channel is not the same
as their post-transition channel, because
these stations have been denied an
extension of their construction deadline
and have been required to follow
remedial procedures, we believe it is
appropriate to treat these stations more
strictly than stations that have met the
current standard and been granted an
extension of the construction deadline.
However, we believe requiring these
two stations to build their pre-transition
channel would be inconsistent with the
policy advanced throughout this
document to shift our focus to
construction of post-transition facilities.
Therefore, we propose that these
stations will not be required to construct
their pre-transition facilities but will
remain admonished and on a remedial
program with respect to construction of
their post-transition facilities. If these
stations fail to meet the construction
deadline established for their posttransition facilities, we propose that
these previously admonished stations
would also be subject to additional
remedial measures similar to those
applicable to stations whose pretransition channel is the same as their
post-transition channel (e.g., the
issuance of forfeitures). We request
comment on these proposals. Our
proposals here are not intended to
conflict with the Construction Deadline
Extension Order or the remedial
measures or possible sanctions
mentioned therein, but instead propose
additional or alternative consequences
for failure to construct by the applicable
deadline.
79. Stations Denied a Waiver of the
Use or Lose Deadline. In the Use or Lose
Order, the Commission determined that
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
seven stations were unable to show that
good cause existed to allow them
additional time to meet their applicable
‘‘use or lose’’ deadline and, thus, were
denied their ‘‘use or lose’’ waiver
requests. Because these stations failed to
meet the applicable replication/
maximization requirements, they lost
interference protection to the unused
portion of the associated coverage area.
In addition, these stations lost the
ability to ‘‘carry over’’ their interference
protection to their unserved DTV
service area on their post-transition
channel. We remind these stations that,
with respect to their pre-transition
channel, they must submit an
application to modify their DTV
construction permit to specify their
reduced facilities, as directed in the Use
or Lose Waiver Order. Nevertheless, we
recognize that the proposals in this
NPRM deemphasize the requirement
that stations construct DTV facilities
that will not be used for post-transition
operations. Therefore, we seek comment
on whether we should reevaluate the
loss of interference protection for these
stations with respect to their post
transition channel.
4. Extension/Waiver of DTV
Construction Deadlines
80. In light of the deadline for
completion of the digital transition and
in view of the changes proposed above
to our construction deadline and use or
lose policies, we believe it is
appropriate at this time to consider the
standard that should apply generally for
grant of an extension of time to
construct DTV facilities pre-transition.
(This new standard will not apply to
digital LPTV facilities.)
81. Under the current rules, the Media
Bureau may grant a six-month extension
of time to construct a DTV station if the
licensee or permittee can show that the
‘‘failure to meet the construction
deadline is due to circumstances that
are either unforeseeable or beyond the
licensee’s control where the licensee has
taken all reasonable steps to resolve the
problem expeditiously.’’ The rules state:
‘‘[s]uch circumstances shall include, but
are not limited to (A) [i]nability to
construct and place in operation a
facility * * * because of delays in
obtaining zoning or FAA approvals, or
similar constraints; (B) the lack of
equipment necessary to obtain a digital
television signal; or (C) where the cost
of meeting the minimum build-out
requirements exceeds the station’s
financial resources.’’ (To qualify under
the financial resources standard, the
applicant must provide (1) an itemized
estimate of the cost of meeting the
minimum build-out requirements; (2) a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
detailed statement explaining why its
financial condition precludes such an
expenditure; (3) a detailed accounting of
the applicant’s good faith efforts to meet
the deadline, including its good faith
efforts to obtain the requisite financing
and an explanation why those efforts
were unsuccessful; and (4) an indication
when the applicant reasonably expects
to complete construction.) These rules
apply to stations granted a paired
license for analog and digital operation
during the transition. The Bureau may
grant no more than two extension
requests upon delegated authority.
Subsequent extension requests must be
referred to the Commission.
82. We propose to revise and tighten
this standard for extension of DTV
construction deadlines to ensure that
stations complete their DTV facilities
and commence operation. The current
standard was adopted early in the DTV
transition process when stations were
first trying to build digital facilities and
applies only to stations with a paired
license. The standard was revised to
include consideration of financial
resources at a time when broadcasters
were still trying to meet the initial
construction deadlines. At this point in
time, however, the initial construction
deadlines for DTV facilities passed
several years ago and the deadline for
completion of the transition is less than
two years away. We believe that stations
at this stage in the transition must
finalize their construction plans and
implement them. We tentatively
conclude that we should revise Section
73.624(d)(3) of the rules, which sets
forth the standard for extension of DTV
construction deadlines, to make that
provision substantially stricter.
Specifically, we propose to eliminate
Section 73.624(d)(3)(ii)(B), which
permits consideration of circumstances
related to the lack of equipment
necessary to obtain a digital television
signal in the evaluation of whether to
grant a request for extension of time to
construct. At this point in the transition,
we believe stations have had ample time
to order the equipment required to
provide digital service and do not
believe it is necessary or appropriate to
grant stations additional time to
construct because of equipment delays,
absent extraordinary circumstances. We
also propose to revise Section
73.624(d)(3)(ii)(C), which permits
consideration of circumstances where
the cost of meeting build-out
requirements exceeds the station’s
financial resources. Specifically, in
seeking a DTV extension, we propose
that the licensee/permittee of a station
may show that it is (1) the subject of a
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37327
bankruptcy or receivership proceeding,
or (2) experiencing severe financial
hardship, as defined by negative cash
flow for the past three years. (Our
proposed showing of three years of
negative cash flow is similar to the
showing considered in determining
whether a station is a ‘‘failed station’’
for purposes of a waiver of our local TV
ownership rules. However, we do not
intend to use the failed station standard
in its entirety as applied in the context
of local TV ownership in determining
whether a station should be granted an
extension of time to construct under our
revised extension standard.) Thus, we
propose to eliminate the existing fourpart test for financial hardship and
replace it with a new test. Stations
seeking an extension based upon
financial considerations would either
(1) submit proof that they have filed for
bankruptcy or that a receiver has been
appointed, or (2) submit an audited
financial statement for the previous
three years. All such stations also would
be required to submit a schedule of
when they expect to complete
construction. We seek comment on this
proposal. In particular, we seek
comment on how this proposal should
be applied to noncommercial
educational stations, whose financial
circumstances often differ from those of
commercial stations.
83. Again, at this stage in the
transition we believe all stations have
had considerable time to address
financial issues related to completion of
their digital facilities and further
consideration of such issues in
connection with a request for additional
time to construct should be limited to a
situations like bankruptcy or
receivership where a court generally
controls the station’s finances, or where
the station can demonstrate severe
financial hardship as discussed above.
Thus, going forward, requests for
extension of time to construct related to
lack of equipment or the cost of meeting
the build-out requirements other than
where the station is in bankruptcy or
receivership or is facing severe financial
hardship as discussed above will not
generally be granted.
84. However, we will continue to
consider going forward requests for
extension of time where the station is
awaiting action by the Commission or a
court on a pending application or
appeal or where action on an
application is being delayed for other
reasons beyond the station’s control,
such as reasons related to international
coordination. We will consider delays
due to international coordination where
resolution of the international
coordination issue is truly beyond the
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37328
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
control of the station, such as where the
failure to obtain coordination will not
permit the station to construct facilities
sufficient to replicate its analog
coverage area. A station seeking to
maximize that cannot obtain
international coordination for such
facilities may be required to construct
facilities with a smaller coverage area.
In addition, we will continue to
consider circumstances related to an act
of God or terrorism. We will revise 47
CFR 73.624(d) and FCC Form 337,
accordingly, and will continue to
require that any request for extension of
time be filed electronically using the
revised form. We propose to apply the
revised rule concerning requests for
extension of time to build DTV facilities
to all requests for extension of
construction deadlines occurring prior
to February 17, 2009. This revised rule
would apply, inter alia, to those stations
whose pre-transition DTV channel is the
same as their post-transition channel
and that were granted extensions or
waivers in the Construction Deadline
Extension Order or the Use or Lose
Order. We recognize that some stations
may request further extensions of time
to build and that other stations, whose
deadlines have not yet expired, may
request extensions of deadlines once
their deadlines expire. We tentatively
conclude that we will apply the revised
rule to any requests that are pending at
the time the revised rule becomes
effective. We seek comment on these
proposals and on this tentative
conclusion. (We note that DTV singleton
stations that were not eligible for a
paired license for analog TV and DTV
operation during the transition are not
currently governed by 47 CFR
73.624(d)(3). These DTV singleton
stations are currently subject to the
tolling provisions of 47 CFR 73.3598(b)
and we propose that these stations
continue to be subject to the provisions
of that section.)
85. We note that while we propose to
establish a stricter standard for requests
for extension of time to construct DTV
facilities, we are also proposing, as
discussed above, to eliminate the
requirement for some stations that they
build pre-transition DTV facilities on
channels that are not their posttransition channel. Taken as a whole,
we believe these proposed changes will
help many stations facing financial
challenges to complete construction of
DTV facilities while also ensuring that
broadcasters continue to focus on the
timely construction of the facilities
necessary to end analog transmission by
February 17, 2009.
86. Post-transition we intend to take
a different approach with respect to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
requests for additional time to construct
DTV facilities. While the transition to
digital broadcasting was underway,
analog broadcasting remained the
primary method by which the vast
majority of American consumers
received over-the-air television. As a
result, while it was important to the
transition that stations begin
transmitting a digital signal, it was not
critical to the ability of over-the-air
viewers to view broadcast television
that they do so. Accordingly, our
extension criteria permitted grant of
extensions of time to construct DTV
facilities based on a number of different
criteria. Once the nation moves to an
all-digital broadcast service, however,
we believe that application of a stricter
‘‘tolling’’ standard for additional time to
construct is appropriate. Once DTV is
the sole broadcast service, we believe
requests for additional time to construct
should be treated as we now treat such
requests for all analog stations and DTV
singletons.
87. Specifically, for all requests for
additional time to construct DTV
facilities for construction deadlines
occurring February 17, 2009 or later, we
tentatively conclude that we will
consider such requests under the tolling
standard set forth in Section 73.3598(b)
of our rules, which currently applies to
DTV singletons and analog TV stations,
as well as AM, FM, International
Broadcast, low power TV, TV translator,
TV booster, FM translator, FM booster,
and LPFM stations. Section 73.3598
provides that the period of construction
for an original construction permit shall
toll when construction is prevented due
to an act of God (e.g., floods, tornados,
hurricanes, or earthquakes), the grant of
the permit is the subject of
administrative or judicial review (i.e.,
petitions for reconsideration and
applications for review of the grant of a
construction permit pending before the
Commission and any judicial appeal), or
construction is delayed by a cause of
action pending in court related to
requirements for construction or
operation of the station (i.e., zoning or
environmental requirements). The rule
further provides that a permittee must
notify the Commission of any event
covered under the provision and
provide supporting documentation in
order to toll the construction deadline.
Permittees are also required to notify the
Commission when a relevant
administrative or judicial review is
resolved. Tolling resulting from an act
of God automatically ceases six months
from the date of the notification to the
Commission unless the permittee
submits additional notifications at six-
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
month intervals detailing how the act of
God continues to cause delays in
construction and describing any
construction progress and the steps the
permittee has taken and proposes to
take to resolve any remaining
impediments. Section 73.3598 further
provides that any construction permit
for which construction has not been
completed and for which an application
for license has not been filed shall be
automatically forfeited upon expiration
without any further affirmative
cancellation by the Commission. (The
Commission has noted that there may be
rare and exceptional circumstances,
other than those delineated in its rules
or decisions adopting the rules, that
would warrant the tolling of
construction time, i.e., other
circumstances in which a permittee is
prevented from completing construction
within the time specified on its original
construction permit for reasons beyond
its control such that the permittee
would be entitled to tolling of the
construction time under 47 U.S.C.
319(b). In these very limited
circumstances, the Commission noted
that it would entertain requests for
waiver of its strict tolling provisions.)
We seek comment on this approach.
(We will consider further amendments
after the transition is completed to
eliminate rules that were adopted only
for the construction of DTV stations
during the transition. As part of that
effort, we may eliminate 47 CFR
73.634(d)(3) and instead rely, as
proposed herein, on 47 CFR 73.3598(b)
for all construction, as we do today for
the broadcast services. We also note that
these proposals are for the full-power
stations subject to the February 17, 2009
deadline. The rules pertaining to low
power, translator and Class A stations
will be the subject of another
proceeding.) We also invite comment on
whether it is necessary to amend
Section 73.3598(a) to specify ‘‘DTV’’ or
if the existing reference to ‘‘new TV’’ in
this section will be adequate in
conjunction with the clarification
provided by the Order to be adopted in
this proceeding. We also seek comment
on whether we should afford small
television broadcasters additional time
to construct DTV facilities. (The Small
Business Administration defines a
television broadcast station as a small
business if such station has no more
than $13.5 million in annual receipts;
13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 515120.
We note that small TV stations, as well
as larger stations, must terminate analog
broadcasting by February 17, 2009, and,
therefore, should have their digital
facility completed by that date.)
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
88. We note that, under the current
rules applicable to DTV stations, the
Commission has permitted a station to
justify an extension request if the
Commission has not acted on the
station’s modification application.
Under the tolling standard we propose
to apply to all construction deadlines
February 17, 2009 and later, the filing of
an application for modification of a
construction permit would not be
grounds for tolling of the construction
deadline. We believe that transitioning
DTV stations to the rule applicable to
construction of analog TV and all other
broadcast stations in this regard is
appropriate post-transition. However,
we propose that delays due to
international coordination would not
generally be grounds for tolling of a
DTV construction permit with two
exceptions. First, the Commission
would toll a construction permit for a
DTV station where the station could
demonstrate that a request for
international coordination had been
sent to Canada or Mexico on behalf of
the station and no response from the
country affected had been received.
Second, the Commission would toll a
DTV construction permit where the
station could demonstrate that the DTV
facility approved by Canada or Mexico
would not permit the station to serve
the viewers currently served by the
station’s analog facility that would also
be served by the station’s digital facility
approved by the Commission. We seek
comment on these proposals and other
changes to Section 73.3598.
5. Early Transition
89. Some stations that are moving to
new post-transition channels (i.e., not
operating on either of their pretransition channels) may want to begin
operating on those new channels before
the transition date. We seek comment
from stations in this category on
whether they believe they permissibly
could operate on their post-transition
channel before the February 17, 2009
deadline for terminating analog
transmissions. We also invite comment
on the potential benefits of early
transition and the impediments that
may exist. We believe that early
transition could advance the transition
if it provided improved DTV service and
freed transition resources for those
stations building later. Under what
circumstances will stations be able to
transition early without causing
impermissible interference to another
station (analog or digital)? We seek
comment on whether there are any
incentives we can or should provide to
stations to operate on their posttransition channel early. We propose to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
allow early transition, provided such
operations would not cause
impermissible interference to another
station. Consistent with our transitional
interference protection policies, we
propose that early transitioning stations
must not cause more than 2.0 percent
interference to any authorized analogonly TV station. Stations interested in
transitioning early should indicate their
intent to do so in their CP or
modification applications for posttransition facilities. (We are proposing
to revise FCC Forms 301 and 340 to
allow stations to simultaneously apply
for both pre- and post-transition
facilities.) Because we tentatively
conclude that stations cannot expand
beyond their facilities defined in the
new DTV Table Appendix B, as
adopted, we believe early transitioning
stations cannot cause additional
interference to post-transition
operations. We also propose to permit
such stations to commence early posttransition operations that may be less
than their full, authorized facilities,
provided impermissible interference is
not caused to another station (analog or
digital). Broadcasters seeking to
commence early post-transition
operations would need to indicate
whether doing so will result in a loss of
their own analog or digital service and,
if so, how they plan to address that loss
in service. As discussed above in the
analog service loss context, we seek
comment on whether (and if so to what
extent) a loss of service should be
acceptable if it would help facilitate the
transition. We seek comment on these
proposals.
6. Additional Proposals to Provide
Regulatory Relief
90. Alternative Buildout. We seek
comment on whether to permit stations
to request an STA to build less than
their full, authorized post-transition
facilities by the relevant construction
deadline, provided these stations at
least serve the same area and population
that receives their current analog TV
and DTV service so that over-the-air
viewers will not lose TV service. Could
such a proposal facilitate the transition
without undermining viewers’ over-theair reception expectations after the
transition date? We would apply the
new construction deadlines and
standard adopted in this proceeding for
additional time to construct to the
construction of such intermediate
facilities that would meet the service
requirement. If we adopt such a
proposal, when must these stations
construct their full, authorized posttransition facilities? If we do not afford
such relief generally, should we afford
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37329
such relief to small television
broadcasters because of unique
challenges they may face in completing
their transition?
91. Temporary Use of In-core PreTransition DTV Channels. We believe
that some stations that are returning to
their analog channel or moving to a new
channel for post-transition operations
may be able to temporarily remain on
their in-core pre-transition DTV channel
and provide adequate service after the
transition date without causing
impermissible interference to other
stations or preventing other stations
from making their transition. We
propose to afford these stations with
this opportunity if doing so would
facilitate their transition. We propose to
allow these stations to choose to
temporarily remain on their pretransition DTV channel if:
(1) They serve at least the same area
and population that receives their
current analog TV and DTV service so
that over-the-air viewers will not lose
TV service. (Stations must ensure that
consumers served pre-transition that
obtain a D-to-A converter box through
the NTIA program or who otherwise
purchase DTV receiver equipment will
be capable of receiving off-the-air DTV
signals post-transition.); and
(2) They do not cause impermissible
interference to other stations or prevent
other stations from making their
transition. We tentatively conclude that
the 0.5 percent interference standard
proposed for post-transition operations
in section V.F.1., below, would apply
because such operations would occur
after the transition deadline.
We seek comment on this proposal.
We propose for stations to make such
requests in accordance with the rules for
STA. We believe affording such
regulatory flexibility to these stations
will facilitate the transition. We seek
comment on this proposal, including its
usefulness to stations and on whether it
is consistent with the statutory
transition deadline. (We note that outof-core DTV stations are prohibited by
statute from remaining on their original
allotted DTV channel after the transition
deadline. Therefore, this flexibility
would not apply to DTV stations
operating out-of-core.) Can a station
readily determine whether its continued
operation after February 17, 2009 on its
pre-transition DTV channel would
interfere with another station’s
transition or operation? If we adopt this
proposal, how long should we allow
stations to remain on their in-core pretransition channel and when must these
stations construct their full, authorized
post-transition facilities? (Whatever
post-transition construction deadline is
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
37330
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
established for these stations, we
propose to apply the new tolling
standard adopted in this proceeding.)
What effect would this proposal have on
the operation of DTV receiver
equipment, including D-to-A converter
boxes? (It is our understanding that
whenever a station changes channels, an
over-the-air viewer using a D-to-A
converter box (or DTV tuner-equipped
set) will have to manually rescan for
available channels in order to receive
that channel.) Finally, we seek comment
on the implications of our proposal with
respect to the adoption of the new DTV
Table.
92. Channel Priority. We recognize
that there may be some situations where
a station’s ability to commence its posttransition operations will be dependent
on another station’s construction and
operating plans. For example, station A
may need to begin testing its digital
facility on its post-transition channel 11
in order to be ready to operate after the
transition date, but station B is currently
using the channel for pre-transition
(analog or digital) service. In such
situations, close cooperation will be
needed between these stations. We
expect that broadcasters will make all
possible accommodations to ensure that
all stations will be able to provide
digital service on their post-transition
channels at the transition date. Stations
are reminded that their authority to
operate on a pre-transition channel,
whether analog or digital, ends on
February 17, 2009, unless they have
applied for and been granted authority
to remain on a pre-transition channel.
We seek comment on whether and, if so,
what steps the Commission should take
to ensure a smooth transition in these
circumstances.
D. Applications to Construct or Modify
DTV Facilities
93. Stations that need to request
authority to construct or modify their
post-transition facilities must file CP or
modification applications (i.e., FCC
Form 301 or 340). (The 634 stations that
need to construct their post-transition
facilities because they will not be using
their currently authorized DTV channel
for post-transition operations are
expected to file after the DTV Table is
adopted. Any of the 1,178 stations that
will use their currently authorized DTV
channel for post-transition operations
but need to change their facilities
because they do not have an
authorization for their intended
operations should also file an
application. For example, a station that
intends to operate its post-transition
facility pursuant an existing STA
operation must file an application to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
modify its CP. Also, some of these
stations may need to apply to increase
power or otherwise adjust their facilities
because they are now operating under
STA at reduced power and they are
unable to construct their authorized CP
facilities, but intend to operate with
more than their current STA facilities
(for example, they intend to raise their
transmitting antenna to a higher height
on their tower, but are unable to mount
it at the authorized height). Other
stations may need to apply to modify
their licensed or CP facilities in order to
better reach their new DTV Table
coverage if such was based on a
certification that differs from their
current license or CP (for example, more
than 200 stations staying on their pretransition DTV channel certified to
replication facilities and their currently
authorized licenses or CPs are unlikely
to exactly match the new DTV Table
facilities that are derived from the
replication coverage). Stations that
already have a license to operate or a CP
to construct their post-transition
channel that matches their new DTV
Table facilities do not need to file any
additional CP applications. This group
includes those stations discussed in
paragraph 17 that will use their
currently authorized DTV channel for
post-transition operations and that will
use facilities that exactly match those
defined in the new DTV Table. These
stations are building their posttransition facilities on the CPs granted
for pre-transition operation. Once they
have completed construction, they
should file for a license to cover (FCC
Form 302) as required by 47 CFR
73.3536. Stations may file an
application to modify their authority on
their current DTV channel at any time,
provided they do not violate the terms
of the Commission’s filing freeze. (On
August 3, 2004, the Media Bureau
imposed a freeze on requests for
changing DTV channels within the DTV
Table and on new DTV channels, as
well as on the filing of modification
applications by television and Class A
television stations, in order to provide a
stable database for conducting the
channel election process and
developing a new DTV Table. The freeze
does not prevent the processing of
pending applications.) Stations that
have a license to operate or a CP to
construct the facilities they want to
retain for post-transition use should file
applications if their licensed facilities or
CP do not match the proposed new DTV
Table Appendix B unless they have
previously filed comments to amend the
Table or Appendix B in the Seventh
FNPRM, MB Docket No. 87–268. (The
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
facilities defined in the proposed new
DTV Table were intended to allow
stations to serve geographic areas based
on licensees’ certification forms (FCC
Form 381) and, in some cases, on
conflict resolution forms (FCC Form 383
and 385). If the DTV facility that a
station intends to license for posttransition operation did not match the
facilities described in the proposed new
DTV Table, but does match the facility
in the revised new DTV Table when
adopted, the station need not file an
application.) Appendix D to the NPRM
lists the stations that are ready for posttransition operations and do not need to
apply for a CP or modification based on
current records. We invite comment on
this list and whether there are stations
that should be added or deleted.
94. Filing Requirements. Commercial
stations that need to construct or modify
their post-transition facilities must file
FCC Form 301 for a minor modification
and submit the appropriate fee.
(Applications to construct or modify
post-transition facilities specified in the
new DTV Table involve a minor change
in facilities and we will process them
accordingly. 47 CFR 73.3572(a)(1)
defines a major change in a television
station’s facilities as any change in
frequency or community of license.
Several stations may be changing
channels as a result of the channel
election process; however, these stations
will be applying for the frequency and
community of license assigned to them
in the new DTV Table that will be
established in the Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 87–268, so we will treat
their applications as not involving a
change in frequency. We believe this
treatment will speed processing. We
also note that this is consistent with our
implementation of the initial DTV Table
in 1998. NCE stations must file FCC
Form 340. We propose that stations
must limit their applications to those
facilities specified in the new DTV
Table Appendix B, as adopted. Pursuant
to this proposal, applications requesting
facilities that would serve a larger area
than stations’ new DTV Table Appendix
B facilities would not be accepted at this
time. Because the new DTV Table will
have resolved the interference conflicts
raised during the channel election
process, we believe we would be able to
process these applications without
having to conduct interference analyses
and without having to consider whether
any applications are mutually exclusive.
We seek comment on this proposal.
Specifically, we seek input from any
stations that may be unable to build
precisely the facilities specified in the
new DTV Table Appendix B (for
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
example, if an antenna producing the
exact antenna pattern is not available).
If such stations are prohibited from
expanding beyond their DTV Table
Appendix B facilities (as proposed infra
in section V.E.), will they instead be
required to reduce their facilities so
significantly that they will be unable to
provide adequate service? If so, should
we allow stations that fall into this
situation to expand beyond their DTV
Table Appendix B facilities to the extent
necessary to address the difference
between the theoretical facilities
specified in the new DTV Table
Appendix B and the actual facilities
which they are able to build?
95. Expedited processing. It is each
station’s responsibility to ensure that it
can begin operations on its posttransition channel upon expiration of
the deadline for the transition on
February 17, 2009. (We note that some
stations may need to complete their
facilities significantly before February
17, 2009, because, for example, they
will not be able to build during the
winter months.) Thus, stations have a
great incentive to promptly file their
applications as soon as possible in order
to have the maximum time to order
equipment and build their facilities.
Stations also have the responsibility to
file their applications in sufficient time
before the deadline so that they may be
granted by the Commission. In order to
provide further incentive for stations to
timely file applications for their posttransition facilities, we propose to
process expeditiously certain
applications, provided they are filed no
later than 45 days after the effective date
of Section 73.616 of the rules adopted
in the Report and Order in this
proceeding. Stations whose channel
assignments or facilities are not
finalized at that time will receive
expedited processing if they file their
applications no later than the deadline
specified in their individual channel
resolutions. We believe this application
filing deadline of 45 days after the
effective date of Section 73.616 of the
rules adopted in the Report and Order
in this proceeding will give stations
ample time to prepare for these filings
and to complete construction prior to
the deadline. (The 45-day application
deadline will not become effective until
OMB approval is obtained for the filing
of these applications.) Specifically, we
propose to offer expedited processing to
stations that timely apply for a CP to
build their post-transition channel,
provided that their application (i) does
not seek to expand the station’s facilities
beyond its new DTV Table Appendix B
facilities; and (ii) specifies facilities that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
match or closely approximate those new
DTV Table Appendix B facilities (i.e., if
the station is unable to build precisely
the facilities specified in the new DTV
Table Appendix B, then it must apply
for facilities that deviate no more than
five percent from those Appendix B
facilities with respect to predicted
population). We believe we can quickly
determine which stations are applying
for facilities that do not extend in any
direction beyond their DTV Table
Appendix B facilities and then
expeditiously review those stations’
applications without conducting a
significant interference analysis because
those applications will either match or
closely approximate their DTV Table
Appendix B facilities. Further, we
believe the creation of this process will
allow us to grant qualified applications
expeditiously, generally within 10 days
of filing. We remind stations that
expedited processing does not mean
they will receive an expeditious grant.
(Stations that receive expedited
processing are not guaranteed that their
application will be granted; the
application still must satisfy the criteria
on Form 301 (or 340 for NCEs), as
revised in this proceeding. Similarly,
stations that do not qualify for
expedited processing will not
necessarily have their applications
denied; rather, their applications simply
will not be processed on an expedited
basis.) Applications that receive
expedited review but that are not
readily grantable by the Commission
will require further action by the
station. (In addition to the proposed
requirements discussed, an application
cannot be granted unless certain other
criteria are met. These include certifying
that the proposed facility: (1) Will not
have a significant environmental
impact; (2) will serve the principal
community of license; (3) will provide
necessary protection to radio astronomy
installations and FCC monitoring
stations; and (4) has had its tower
approved by FAA, if necessary.) We
seek comment on this proposal. We also
seek comment on alternative methods to
streamline the application process.
96. Revisions to FCC Form 301 and
340. To accommodate filings related to
stations’ post-transition facilities, we
propose to modify the FCC Forms 301
and 340, as attached. The form changes
will allow stations to indicate that they
are applying for post-transition
facilities. They also will facilitate the
expedited processing discussed above.
We seek comment on our proposed
forms and if additional changes to the
forms are needed.
97. Program tests/License to Cover CP.
Stations must not commence program
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37331
tests on their post-transition channels
until they are ready to begin posttransition operations under program test
authority. Stations that want to conduct
program tests on their post-transition
facilities must comply with the
Commission’s rules and coordinate with
any affected stations when they do the
testing. Each station is responsible for
determining which other stations may
be affected and coordinating
accordingly. We expect that stations
will work together cooperatively to
facilitate testing. Upon completion of
the construction of a television facility
as authorized by a CP, a station may
commence program tests upon
notification to the Commission,
provided that an application for a
license to cover the CP for the posttransition facility, on FCC Form 302, is
filed within 10 days, along with the
appropriate fee. (Stations must comply
with the terms of their CP as well as the
technical provisions of the application,
or rules and regulations, and the
applicable engineering standards. We
remind stations that will be using
Channel 14 for post-transition
operations that they must take special
precautions to avoid interference to
adjacent spectrum land mobile radio
service facilities before commencing
program testing. Where a TV station is
authorized and operating prior to the
authorization and operation of the land
mobile facility, a Channel 14 station
must attenuate its emissions within the
frequency range 467 to 470 MHz if
necessary to permit reasonable use of
the adjacent frequencies by land mobile
licensees.) We do not believe any rule
changes are necessary here.
E. Expanding Facilities
98. During the channel election
process, stations defined their posttransition facilities, deciding whether
they would (1) replicate their allotted
facilities, (2) maximize to their currently
authorized facilities, or (3) reduce to a
currently authorized smaller facility.
Stations, however, were not allowed to
seek facilities that would expand their
coverage areas beyond that authorized
by a license, CP or STA. This was
precluded by the Commission’s freeze
on the filing of maximization
applications in order to provide a stable
database for developing the new DTV
Table.
99. We recognize that stations may
want to apply to expand their facilities
to serve a larger area than defined in the
new DTV Table Appendix B, as
adopted. Stations’ new channel
assignments may present them with
new opportunities to offer expanded
DTV coverage, either because the
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
37332
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
stations may be moving to a new
channel that does not have the same
interference restrictions or because
other stations on adjacent channels may
be moving away, thus eliminating prior
interference conflicts. It may save some
stations time and money if they are able
to file only one application for
expanded facilities.
100. We believe, however, that we
must first ensure that all stations can at
least provide digital service to their
analog viewers by the transition date
before considering new maximization
applications. We thus tentatively decide
not to allow stations to apply for
expanded facilities at this time. We
propose to consider the issue of
expanded facilities after all stations
have had an opportunity to apply for
their facilities as specified in the new
DTV Table Appendix B. We seek
comment on this approach and on our
tentative conclusions. We also invite
comment on ways in which stations
could seek expanded facilities at this
time without delaying the transition or
overburdening the scarce resources
needed by other stations to transition.
F. Interference Standards
101. Although we have proposed,
above, not to allow stations to apply to
maximize their facilities at the same
time that we will be accepting
applications for construction permits for
the new DTV Table Appendix B
facilities, we do intend to allow stations
to apply for maximization once it is
appropriate to do so. At that point, we
will need to have our post-transition
interference standards in place. In
addition, it is our understanding that
knowing what those post-transition
interference standards will be in
advance may enable stations to
anticipate future equipment needs and
allow them to minimize their capital
expenditures by buying equipment that
can be used both now and in the future.
(We cannot provide any guarantees
regarding whether and/or to what extent
any particular broadcaster may be able
to expand their facilities in the future.)
Accordingly, we believe it is
appropriate at this time to propose what
those post-transition interference
standards will be. In this section, we
consider interference protection
methodologies and requirements for
application processing, as well as for
rulemaking petitions to add a new DTV
allotment or change the channel of an
existing allotment.
102. In adopting the initial DTV Table
in the 1997 Sixth Report and Order, the
Commission concluded that it would
apply geographic spacing standards in
determining whether to permit the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
addition of DTV allotments in the Table.
(47 CFR 73.623(d) specifies the
minimum geographic spacing
requirements for DTV allotments not
included in the initial DTV Table. 47
CFR 73.623(c) sets forth the criteria for
applications to modify assignments in
the initial DTV Table, including the
thresholds of desired-to-undesired (D/U)
ratios at which interference is
considered to occur. 47 CFR 73.622(e)
defines a DTV station’s service area as
the geographic area within the stations’
noise-limited F(50,90) contour where its
signal is predicted to exceed the noiselimited service level. The F(50,90)
designator indicates that a specified
field strength necessary for the
provision of DTV service is expected to
be available at 50 percent of the
locations 90 percent of the time. A
station’s noise-limited contour is
computed using its actual transmitter
location, ERP, antenna HAAT, and
antenna radiation pattern.) The
Commission noted that geographic
spacing provides a clear and simple
measure of acceptability of an allotment
proposal without the need to engage in
extensive analysis of interference and
has been used successfully in the
television service for many years. (The
Commission considered but ultimately
rejected an alternative approach
whereby a party requesting an addition
to, or modification of, the DTV Table
would be required to show that a station
operating at the maximum permissible
ERP and antenna height on the
proposed allotment would not exceed
the engineering interference criteria
with regard to any other existing
allotment.) The Commission recognized,
however, that engineering criteria may
allow more efficient use of the spectrum
and stated it would revisit the allotment
criteria at an appropriate point later in
the DTV transition process. The
Commission also determined in the
Sixth Report and Order that a party
applying for a modification of the DTV
Table would need to show that its
proposed modification would not result
in any new predicted interference to
other DTV allotments or existing NTSC
stations, based on the engineering
technical criteria used to develop the
initial DTV Table. On reconsideration,
the Commission replaced this no new
interference standard with a de minimis
standard pursuant to which stations
may make changes in their operation
where the requested change would not
result in more than a 2.0 percent
increase in interference to the
population served by another TV or
DTV broadcast station, and provided
that the protected station is not, or will
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
not be, receiving interference in excess
of 10 percent of its population from all
combined interfering stations. This de
minimis standard for permissible new
interference was adopted to provide
flexibility for broadcasters in the
implementation of DTV by allowing
additional opportunities for stations to
maximize their DTV coverage and/or
service by increasing power and/or
making other changes in their facilities.
103. The Commission has also relied
on other interference standards in the
DTV context. For example, applicants
seeking facilities modifications of fullservice NTSC stations are allowed to
cause a 0.5 percent margin above a
prediction of no reduction in the
population served by a DTV station to
account for rounding and calculation
tolerances. Applicants for analog TV
translator and low power TV (‘‘LPTV’’)
stations must propose facilities that do
not exceed specified threshold D/U
ratios at a DTV station’s noise-limited
contour or at all points within the noiselimited area in the case of adjacent
channel stations proposing to locate
inside the DTV noise-limited contour.
(Similarly, a licensee requesting DTV
facilities modifications that would
expand its station’s service area in any
direction must meet D/U protection
requirements at the protected contour of
Class A TV stations authorized on the
same or first adjacent channel. In all
cases in which the interference standard
is based on signal contour protection,
applicants are permitted to base
requests to waive the standard on the
DTV protection standards and
methodology in 47 CFR 73.623(c).) In
addition, in the channel election
process that led to the proposed new
DTV Table for post-transition operation,
an interference conflict was determined
to exist when it was predicted that more
than 0.1 percent new interference would
be caused to another station. (New
interference was considered to
constitute a conflict when the new
interference affected more than 0.1
percent of the population predicted to
be served by the station in the absence
of that new interference. In the Second
DTV Periodic Report and Order, the
Commission permitted the 0.1 percent
additional interference limit to be
exceeded on a limited basis in order to
afford stations with an out-of-core DTV
channel to elect to operate its posttransition station on its in-core analog
channel.)
1. Proposed Interference Criteria
104. When evaluating applications to
construct post-transition facilities, we
propose to use an interference
protection requirement based on
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
engineering criteria (e.g., permissible
interference) rather than a geographic
spacing requirement. We believe this
will allow for a more flexible design of
proposed stations while offering a high
level of protection to existing authorized
service. By their nature, geographic
spacing requirements do not take into
account intervening terrain features (or
the lack of such features). Stations
separated by the same distance may
create significant mutual interference in
areas of flat terrain while no
interference is predicted in
circumstances where intervening terrain
limits the signals from either or both
stations. Where authorized DTV stations
wish to change their assigned DTV
channel through a rulemaking petition,
we also believe applying the proposed
engineering criteria is appropriate. On
the other hand, we continue to believe
that geographic spacing requirements
represent a preferred approach for
evaluating a petition for rulemaking
requesting a new DTV allotment. In
such new allotment cases, information
about actual transmitter site locations
and facilities are generally not available.
We propose to apply an engineering
criteria approach in all cases involving
applications and to use geographic
spacing requirements only for
rulemaking petitions seeking new DTV
channel allotments. We seek comment
on these proposals and tentative
conclusions, as well as on alternative
methods of providing interference
protection.
105. Our proposed engineering
criteria to evaluate all post-transition
applications would limit the predicted
interference that a station may cause to
0.5 percent of the protected station’s
service population. This proposed 0.5
percent interference standard is stricter
than the 2 percent/10 percent criteria
that has applied since early in the DTV
transition. The 2 percent/10 percent
rules were established in order to
accomplish the difficult task of
accommodating every existing TV
station with a second channel for DTV
operation within the spectrum already
allocated for TV broadcasting and
heavily used in some areas. As
indicated above, the Commission
initially adopted a stricter ‘‘no
interference’’ standard, but on
reconsideration recognized that stations
would need flexibility as they attempted
to implement their second channels in
this congested spectrum environment.
The flexibility provided under the 2
percent/10 percent standard allowed
many stations to propose increased
coverage, helping to provide DTV
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
signals to more viewers early in the
transition.
106. In addition, we note that our 0.5
percent proposal is not as strict as the
0.1 percent new interference criterion
that was employed for determining
interference conflicts in the channel
election process.
107. Our proposed requirement that
interference from a DTV application for
post-transition use not exceed 0.5
percent is the same requirement as we
have used during the transition for
analog TV stations protecting DTV
stations. It can be viewed as a ‘‘no new
interference’’ criteria when the amount
of predicted interference is rounded to
the nearest whole percent (i.e., any
determination of less than 0.5 percent
interference would be considered to be
0 percent, while an interference
determination greater than 0.5 percent
would round up to 1.0 percent.) This
level of rounding is more reflective of
the accuracy of the interference
prediction model than the 0.1 percent
criterion. (The 0.5 percent allowable
predicted interference level is also used
for Class A TV stations protecting DTV
stations pursuant to 47 CFR 73.6013 and
for determination of LPTV and TV
translator protection of full service
DTV.)
108. Because our proposed 0.5
percent interference limit is
significantly less than the 2 percent
limit that we now use, we do not believe
it is necessary to continue to impose the
10 percent cap on total interference
from all sources. (In the initial DTV
Table, the Commission necessarily
exceeded the 10 percent limit with
respect to a significant number of
stations. In contrast to the initial Table,
the new Table will not be as congested
because stations will be returning one of
their paired channels.) The new DTV
Table has fewer stations than the initial
Table that exceed the 10 percent limit
and many of those stations elected their
proposed channel knowing that the
amount of interference would exceed
that amount. In lieu of the 10 percent
component of the current standard, we
propose to limit the total interference
any station would receive from all
sources by requiring that stations
already predicted to cause more than 0.5
percent interference to another station
will not be allowed to increase the
interference they are authorized to
cause. (For example, an application
would not be granted for a station that
is authorized to cause 1.8 percent
predicted interference if the facilities
proposed in the application are
predicted to raise the amount of
interference caused to 1.9 percent.)
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37333
109. We seek comment on our
proposals to limit permissible
interference to 0.5 percent and to not
allow any increase in situations where
the amount of interference currently
caused exceeds 0.5 percent, as well as
on any other methods to limit total
interference. Does 0.5 percent reflect the
right balance between protecting
established DTV service and affording
adequate flexibility to stations seeking
to establish post-transition operations?
Would another amount be more
appropriate?
110. We propose to evaluate
compliance with the 0.5 percent
standard using the Office of Engineering
and Technology’s OET Bulletin No. 69
(‘‘OET 69’’) methodology, but using
2000 census data as was done during
the channel election process. (The more
up-to-date population data from the year
2000 census was used to provide a more
accurate indication of the station service
and impacts of interference on that
service than the older year 1990
population data used in computing the
service data for the initial DTV Table.)
We seek comment on whether other
changes to the OET 69 methodology are
necessary here. For example, the
standard OET 69 analysis evaluates
‘‘cells’’ within a station’s coverage area
which are squares 2 kilometers on a
side. We have generally allowed
applicants to specify analysis based on
cells that are smaller because such
analysis is arguably more accurate. As a
result, we understand that some
applications have been based on
evaluating many possible smaller cell
sizes until the desired result is obtained.
(For example, if an application would
fail based on 1.0 km cells but passes
based on 1.5 km cells, the applicant
would request evaluation based on the
1.5 km cell size.) Such ‘‘shopping’’ for
advantageous cell sizes does not
improve the accuracy of the evaluation.
Should standards for allowable smaller
cell sizes be established (for example
only allowing 1.0 km or 0.5 km cell
sizes to be requested)?
111. We also note that, in other
proceedings, we have received
comments that it may be useful to adopt
variable D/U ratios for adjacent channel
interference depending upon the
received signal levels predicted for the
desired signals because the D/U
interference ratios employed for upper
and lower first-adjacent channels are
based on test results for weak desired
signal strengths and may produce
inaccurate predictions where the
interfering station is located in an area
that receives a strong desired signal
strength. Thus, we seek comment on
whether a change should be adopted to
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37334
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
reflect this concern in situations where
adjacent-channel transmitters are
proposed to be located inside a desired
station’s noise-limited service contour.
(Such situations may become more
prevalent if rules are adopted allowing
distributed transmission systems
(‘‘DTS’’).)
112. For new DTV allotments, we
propose to continue to use the DTV-toDTV geographic separation
requirements contained in Section
73.623(d) of the rules. We note that
these distances were developed to be
analogous to the long-standing analog
TV geographic spacing rules. We intend
that our consideration of petitions for
rule making requesting new DTV
allotments will be consistent with the
process we have used for analog TV
allotments in that short-spacing waivers
will not be allowed. However, as with
analog spacing distances, the DTV
spacing distances allow regular
occasions of predicted interference to
occur. After a new DTV allotment has
been approved, we propose to regulate
the extent of this interference by
requiring applications for these DTV
allotments to comply with the same
engineering criteria standards we are
proposing for all other DTV
applications. This method of allowing
flexibility for applicants seeking a new
DTV allotment while protecting existing
DTV stations’ service is consistent with
our analog TV application practice of
considering applications that require a
waiver of the geographic spacing
requirements. We seek comment on this
proposal, as well as on alternative
methods for evaluating requests for new
DTV allotments.
113. Going forward, we propose to
protect each station’s new DTV Table
Appendix B facilities’ coverage only
until it has a CP or license for its posttransition operation, at which time we
will limit its interference protection to
its authorized coverage area. We
recognize, however, that we are
proposing to require that stations
initially apply for facilities that do not
expand their certified coverage and
some stations would need to specify
facilities that create a predicted service
contour that is smaller in some
directions than their certified coverage
contour in order to comply with that
proposal. When the filing freeze is
lifted, we expect many such stations
will file maximization applications. To
avoid penalizing stations in such a
situation, we propose to temporarily
continue to require that other stations’
maximization applications protect the
new DTV Table Appendix B facilities of
stations, even though most stations
should have a CP or license at that time.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
At an appropriate time, the Media
Bureau would announce the change to
limit the required protection to CPs and
licenses for stations that have such
authorizations. We seek comment on
this proposal.
2. Pre-Transitional Operations
114. We continue to process
applications for analog and DTV new
stations, and changes to existing or
authorized stations that comply with the
freeze. With respect to these
applications for pre-transition
operation, we intend to continue using
the current interference protection rules.
We seek comment on this conclusion. In
particular, the current requirements
provide that an application for a new or
modified analog TV station must not
cause more than 0.5 percent interference
to any authorized DTV station or
allotment. Such an analog TV
application must protect other analog
TV stations by meeting the distance
spacing requirements. An application
for a new or modified DTV station must
not cause more than 2.0 percent
interference to any authorized analog
TV station, DTV station or DTV
allotment. Such DTV applications also
must not cause the total cumulative
interference received by any protected
station to exceed 10.0 percent. (DTV
applications also must protect Class A
TV stations as provided in 47 CFR
73.623(c)(5) and stations in the land
mobile radio service pursuant to 47 CFR
73.623(e).) Calculations of predicted
interference percentages will continue
to be based on the standard OET 69
methodology, including use of 1990
Census data. (Although new population
data is available, we believe it is
appropriate to continue to use the 1990
census data for the predicting the
populations to be served by the
remaining analog and new digital
television stations to be processed
during the transition and the
interference those stations would cause
to other stations. The predictions of
population served and interference
received used in developing initial DTV
transition assignments in 1998 were
based on the 1990 census and that
population base has been relied on
subsequently in processing of
applications for analog and DTV
modifications and new stations. Our
continued use of the 1990 census data
for processing the few remaining
transition applications will provide for
treatment of these applications on the
same basis as other stations during the
transition. We also do not believe that
the differences in population patterns
between the 1990 and 2000 census are
of sufficient significance for TV service
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
purposes in the short remaining time of
the transition as to warrant
recomputation of the service and
interference predictions for all analog
and DTV stations operating during the
transition.) The current database of
authorized or applied for stations would
also continue to be used.
G. Other Issues
1. DTV Transmission Standard (ATSC
A/53)
115. In the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order, the Commission
revised its DTV transmission standard,
contained in Section 73.682(d) of the
rules, to specify the use of the August
7, 2001 Advanced Television Systems
Committee (‘‘ATSC’’) DTV transmission
standard A/53 Revision B with
Amendment 1 and Amendment 2 (‘‘A/
53–B’’). The Commission also stated
that it would continue to encourage
further improvements to the DTV
standards and conduct additional
rulemakings as appropriate to
incorporate future updates of the ATSC
DTV transmission standard into the
Commission’s rules. We propose to
update Section 73.682(d) to reflect
revisions to the ATSC DTV transmission
standard A/53–B since the Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order. We seek
comment on this proposal.
116. Since Section 73.682(d) was
revised in the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order, ATSC has continued
to update the ATSC DTV transmission
standard; the current version is A/53
Revision E, with Amendments No. 1
and 2 (‘‘A/53–E’’). A/53–E differs from
A/53–B in several respects. First, A/53–
E offers several improvements over A/
53–B, including the specifications for
Enhanced 8–VSB (‘‘E8–VSB’’) for
terrestrial broadcast. E8–VSB enables
Enhanced Services, which allow
broadcasters to allocate the base 19.39
Mbps data rate between Main Service
data and Enhanced Services data.
Enhanced Services data is designed to
have higher immunity to certain
channel impairments than Main Service
data, but Enhanced Services data is
delivered at a reduced information rate
selected by the broadcaster from the
specified options. A/53–E further
describes the coding constraints that
apply to the use of the MPEG–2 systems
specification in the DTV system,
including mandatory main and optional
enhanced services. It also improves the
Active Format Description (‘‘AFD’’)
specifications by revising and clarifying
the relevant standards. In light of these
advantages, we believe that updating the
Commission’s rules to specify A/53–E
will benefit both broadcasters and
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
consumers by allowing broadcasters the
flexibility to offer new technological
services. We seek comment on this
tentative conclusion.
117. In the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order, the Commission
declined to mandate that broadcasters
use the AFD when the active video
portion picture does not completely fill
the coded picture. The Commission
stated that the revisions in the new
standard were developed through
careful consideration and deliberation
within the technical committees of
ATSC and thus reflected a consensus
agreement based on the input of parties
from various segments of the industry.
As a result, broadcasters were given the
option to use AFD, but if a station
included AFD data it had to follow the
ATSC standard. The Commission noted,
however, that as more consumers
acquired widescreen aspect ratio sets,
the problem of ‘‘postage stamp video’’
would become more prevalent if not
addressed by broadcasters. At the time,
the Commission believed that
broadcasters would want to make their
programming attractive to viewers as
they begin to adopt DTV. A coordinated
effort on clarifying AFD and bar data
standards between ATSC, CEA and the
Society of Motion Picture and
Television Engineers (‘‘SMPTE’’)
resulted in a CEA recommended
practice (CEA–CEB16) titled ‘‘Active
Format Description (AFD) & Bar Data
Recommended Practice,’’ and a
proposed SMPTE 2016–1 standard for
television—Format for Active Format
Description and Bar Data. These efforts
were designed to encourage the use of
AFD by broadcasters. We thus seek
comment on whether these voluntary,
industry driven efforts are sufficient, or
if, instead, we should require
broadcasters to provide AFD and bar
data. If we do impose such a
requirement, should broadcasters be
required to provide AFD data for all
programming broadcast, regardless of its
source? Should such a requirement
extend to live programming (e.g., sports
and other events where a combination
of SD and HD equipment may be used)?
Assuming that we did require the
inclusion of AFD, what effect would the
imposition of such a requirement have
on small broadcasters? We seek
comment on these issues.
2. Program System and Information
Protocol (‘‘PSIP’’) Standard
118. In the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order, the Commission
revised Section 73.682(d) to require the
use of the ATSC Program System and
Information Protocol (‘‘PSIP’’) standard
A/65–B. PSIP data is transmitted along
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
with a station’s DTV signal and provides
DTV receivers with information about
the station and what is being broadcast.
PSIP data provides a method for DTV
receivers to identify a DTV station and
to determine how a receiver can tune to
it. For any given station, the PSIP data
transmitted along with the digital signal
identifies both its DTV channel number
and its analog channel number (referred
to as the ‘‘major’’ channel number),
thereby making it easy for viewers to
tune to the station’s DTV channel even
if they only know the station’s major
channel number. In addition, PSIP data
tells the receiver whether multiple
program streams are being broadcast
and, if so, how to find them. It also
identifies whether the programs are
closed captioned, conveys available Vchip information, and provides program
information, among other things. The
Commission has recognized the utility
that the ATSC PSIP standard offers for
both broadcasters and consumers.
119. Since Section 73.682(d) was
revised in the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order, ATSC has updated
the ATSC PSIP standard; the current
version is A/65–C. This new revision
further enhances the PSIP standard and
support for delivery of data. The
updated ATSC PSIP standard now
requires broadcasters to populate the
Event Information Tables (‘‘EITs’’) with
accurate information about each event
and to update the EIT if more accurate
information becomes available.
Currently, under version A/65–B, many
broadcasters provide only general
information in the EIT tables. For
example, a network affiliate may
provide ‘‘network programming’’ as the
descriptor for the majority of its
program offerings. We propose to
update Section 73.682(d) to reflect these
revisions to the ATSC PSIP standard
since the Second DTV Periodic Report
and Order. We seek comment on this
proposal. In particular, we request input
regarding the burden that compliance
with A/65–C would place on
broadcasters—especially small
broadcasters.
120. We also seek comment from
broadcasters and others as to the need
to include more accurate, detailed, and
up-to-date information about each event
under this new PSIP standard. We also
seek comment about whether PSIP
information is being passed through to
cable and satellite subscribers. If
satellite carriers are not passing through
PSIP information, is the information
otherwise being reflected adequately in
the electronic program guide and signal
they provide to subscribers?
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37335
3. Fees for Ancillary and Supplementary
Services
121. In this section, we seek comment
on Section 73.624(g) of the
Commission’s rules, which requires
DTV licensees to report whether they
have provided ancillary and
supplementary services and to pay a fee
of five percent of gross revenues derived
from certain of those services. As
currently written, this rule refers to the
payment of such fees by ‘‘DTV
licensees.’’ We seek comment on
whether the Commission can and
should revise its rules to require that all
DTV broadcasters, including permittees
operating pursuant to an STA or any
other FCC instrument authorizing DTV
transmissions, that earn revenue from
feeable ancillary and supplementary
services, are subject to the provisions of
Section 73.624(g).
4. Station Identification
122. In 2004, the Commission
established rules generally requiring
DTV stations to follow the same rules
for station identification as analog
stations. Specifically, digital stations are
required to make station identification
announcements, either visually or
aurally, at the beginning and end of
each time of operation as well as hourly.
The identification must consist of the
station’s call letters followed by the
community or communities specified in
the station’s license as the station’s
location. Stations may insert between
the call letters and the station’s
community of license the station’s
frequency, channel number, name of the
licensee, and/or the name of the
network, at their discretion.
123. A station choosing to include its
channel number in its station
identification must use the major
(analog) channel number. (Thus, a
broadcaster who operates an NTSC
service on channel ‘‘26’’ and a DTV
service on channel ‘‘27’’ would use the
major channel ‘‘26’’ in station
identification announcements.) The
Commission adopted the ATSC A/65B
standard and noted that PSIP, which is
part of that standard, allows viewers to
see a broadcaster’s major channel
number regardless of the broadcaster’s
allocated digital broadcast channel.
(This allows broadcasters to keep their
existing channel number in the digital
world, thereby assisting viewers who
have come to identify these numbers
with particular broadcasters and
preserving the investment broadcasters
have made in marketing these numbers.)
The Commission permitted stations
choosing to multicast to include
additional information in their station
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37336
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
announcements identifying each
program stream. (Thus, a station with
major channel number 26 might have
channel 26.0 (NTSC program stream),
channel 26.1 (HDTV), and 26.2 (SDTV).
Stations may provide information in the
station announcement identifying the
network affiliation of the program
service (e.g., ‘‘WXXX–DT, channel 26.1,
YYY (community of license), your CW
network channel’’). Stations
simulcasting their analog programming
on their digital channel are permitted to
make station identification
announcements simultaneously for both
stations as long as the identification
includes both call signs (e.g., ‘‘WXXX–
TV and WXXX–DT’’) if it is intended to
serve as the identification for both
program streams. Stations simulcasting
the analog stream on the digital channel
may also do a shortened identification
for both streams (e.g., ‘‘WXXX–TV/
DT’’). The Commission’s rules require
that the station that is transmitting the
multicast stream is the station whose
identification must appear on the
program stream. (Thus, if station
WXXX–DT is transmitting programming
provided by WYYY–TV or WYYY–LP
on one of WXXX–DT’s multicast
streams, the identification on that
stream must be the frequency and
location of WXXX–DT.)
124. Now that stations have some
experience in applying these station
identification rules to digital stations,
we invite comment on whether these
rules provide sufficient clarity to
broadcasters and viewers. We
specifically invite comment on whether
the current rules provide for appropriate
identification of multicast channels,
particularly in circumstances in which
one of a station’s multicast streams is
being used to air programming provided
by another broadcast station, such as a
low power station. As the Commission
has previously noted, as stations
transition to digital format and provide
multicast programming, thereby
increasing the number of program
streams potentially available to the
public, clear identification of the station
providing the programming viewers are
watching becomes increasingly
important, both for the viewers and for
stations themselves. We invite comment
on any and all aspects of the
Commission’s station identification
rules, whether any changes to or
clarifications of the rules are
appropriate, and, if particular problems
implementing the rules have arisen,
specific proposals for how the rules
should be changed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
5. Coordination With Cable Operators,
Satellite Systems and Other MVPD
Providers
125. We recognize that the transition
to digital television necessarily involves
coordination with Multichannel Video
Programming Distributors (‘‘MVPDs’’).
(MVPDs include cable operators and
Direct Broadcast Satellite carriers. As of
June 2005, approximately 94.2 million
TV households, or almost 86 percent of
TV households, subscribe to an MVPD
service.) Because a majority of television
viewers receive their broadcast signals
via an MVPD, if these providers have
problems receiving and retransmitting
digital signals when analog signals are
turned off, that could have a significant
adverse impact on the digital transition.
We seek comment here on the issues
specifically related to MVPD readiness
to receive and retransmit digital signals
to their subscribers when analog service
ends on February 17, 2009. (General
issues regarding mandatory carriage of
digital broadcast signals are being
addressed in other dockets.) We also
invite comment on what steps, if any,
are necessary to allow consumers to
continue to receive over-the-air
television signals in a variety of settings
outside their homes, such as hotels,
restaurants, universities and offices.
126. In this regard, we solicit
comment from cable operators, satellite
carriers, and private cable operators
(also known as Satellite Master Antenna
Television or ‘‘SMATV’’ providers)
regarding steps they are taking to ensure
that their subscribers will continue to
receive local broadcast stations after the
termination of over-the-air analog
broadcast signals from full power
stations. Moreover, we request comment
on whether and what type of
coordination is needed between
broadcast television stations and
MVPDs to facilitate a timely and smooth
transition, whether this coordination is
underway, and what actions the
Commission could take to facilitate that
coordination. For example, will cable
and satellite operators have technical
difficulties receiving digital signals from
local television stations on new
channels (and in some cases from
different transmission facilities)? Are
changes needed at cable and SMATV
headends and satellite local receive
facilities to receive these signals? Have
MVPDs experienced difficulties
receiving and retransmitting local
digital broadcast signals thus far? Will
MVPDs be able to handle all the various
channel changes and other
modifications that will be necessary,
many of which will occur at midnight
on February 17, 2009? Do MVPDs need
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
to test reception and retransmission
capabilities in advance of the transition,
and, if so, when, and how, in light of
construction deadlines?
VI. Procedural Matters
A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis
127. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(‘‘RFA’’) the Commission has prepared
this present Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (‘‘IRFA’’)
concerning the possible significant
economic impact on small entities by
the policies and rules proposed in this
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(‘‘NPRM’’). Written public comments are
requested on this IRFA. Comments must
be identified as responses to the IRFA
and must be filed by the deadlines for
comments indicated on the first page of
the NPRM. The Commission will send a
copy of the NPRM, including this IRFA,
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA).
In addition, the NPRM and IRFA (or
summaries thereof) will be published in
the Federal Register.
A. Need for and Objectives of the
Proposed Rules
128. This NPRM begins the
Commission’s third periodic review of
the transition of the nation’s broadcast
television system from analog to digital
television (‘‘DTV’’). The Commission
conducts these periodic reviews in
order to assess the progress of the
transition and make any necessary
adjustments to the Commission’s rules
and policies to facilitate the
introduction of DTV service and the
recovery of spectrum at the end of the
transition. In 2005, Congress mandated
that after February 17, 2009, full-power
television broadcast stations must
transmit only in digital signals, and may
no longer transmit analog signals.
129. The purpose of this NPRM,
generally, is to (1) provide a progress
report on the DTV transition; (2)
describe the status and readiness of
existing stations to complete the
transition; (3) consider and propose the
procedures and rule changes necessary
to complete the transition; and (4)
address other issues related to the
transition. In particular, the NPRM
proposes (1) rules for applying to
construct final, DTV facilities and (2)
construction deadlines for the
completion of final, DTV facilities.
130. The primary objectives of this
NPRM is to ensure that, by the February
17, 2009 transition date, all full-power
television broadcast stations (1) cease
analog broadcasting and (2) have
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
completed construction and begun
operating their final, DTV facilities. In
addition, the NPRM considers proposals
to provide broadcasters with the
regulatory flexibility necessary to meet
these goals.
B. Legal Basis
131. The authority for the action
proposed in this rulemaking is
contained in Sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 7,
301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 312, 316,
318, 319, 324, 325, 336, and 337 of the
Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C
151, 154(i) and (j), 157, 301, 302a, 303,
307, 308, 309, 312, 316, 318, 319, 324,
325, 336, and 337.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
C. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rules Will Apply
132. The RFA directs the Commission
to provide a description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities that will be affected by the
proposed rules, if adopted. The RFA
generally defines the term ‘‘small
entity’’ as having the same meaning as
the terms ‘‘small business,’’ small
organization,’’ and ‘‘small government
jurisdiction.’’ In addition, the term
‘‘small business’’ has the same meaning
as the term ‘‘small business concern’’
under the Small Business Act. A small
business concern is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the SBA.
133. We believe that full-power
television broadcast stations will be
directly and primarily affected by the
proposed rules, if adopted. Although the
proposed rules will not apply to Class
A TV stations, low power television
(LPTV) stations, and TV translator
stations, it is still possible that these
entities may be affected by the proposed
rules. For example, the proposed rules,
if adopted, would permit applications
for analog translators to be filed under
specific circumstances and in that way
may affect TV translator stations.
Otherwise, we do not believe any other
types of entities will be directly affected
by the proposed rules; however, request
comment on this tentative conclusion. A
description of the small entities that
may be directly affected, as well as an
estimate of the number of such small
entities, is provided below.
Entities Directly Affected by Proposed
Rules
134. Television Broadcasting. The
proposed rules and policies apply to
television broadcast licensees and
potential licensees of television service.
The SBA defines a television broadcast
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
station as a small business if such
station has no more than $13.5 million
in annual receipts. Business concerns
included in this industry are those
‘‘primarily engaged in broadcasting
images together with sound.’’ The
Commission has estimated the number
of licensed commercial television
stations to be 1,376. According to
Commission staff review of the BIA
Financial Network, MAPro Television
Database (‘‘BIA’’) on March 30, 2007,
about 986 of an estimated 1,374
commercial television stations (or about
72 percent) have revenues of $13.5
million or less and thus qualify as small
entities under the SBA definition. The
Commission has estimated the number
of licensed NCE television stations to be
380. We note, however, that, in
assessing whether a business concern
qualifies as small under the above
definition, business (control) affiliations
must be included. Our estimate,
therefore, likely overstates the number
of small entities that might be affected
by our action, because the revenue
figure on which it is based does not
include or aggregate revenues from
affiliated companies. The Commission
does not compile and otherwise does
not have access to information on the
revenue of NCE stations that would
permit it to determine how many such
stations would qualify as small entities.
135. In addition, an element of the
definition of ‘‘small business’’ is that the
entity not be dominant in its field of
operation. We are unable at this time to
define or quantify the criteria that
would establish whether a specific
television station is dominant in its field
of operation. Accordingly, the estimate
of small businesses to which rules may
apply do not exclude any television
station from the definition of a small
business on this basis and are therefore
over-inclusive to that extent. Also as
noted, an additional element of the
definition of ‘‘small business’’ is that the
entity must be independently owned
and operated. We note that it is difficult
at times to assess these criteria in the
context of media entities and our
estimates of small businesses to which
they apply may be over-inclusive to this
extent.
136. Class A TV, LPTV, and TV
translator stations. The proposed rules
and policies may also apply to licensees
of Class A TV stations, low power
television (LPTV) stations, and TV
translator stations, as well as to
potential licensees in these television
services. The same SBA definition that
applies to television broadcast licensees
would apply to these stations. The SBA
defines a television broadcast station as
a small business if such station has no
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37337
more than $13.5 million in annual
receipts. Currently, there are
approximately 567 licensed Class A
stations, 2,227 licensed LPTV stations,
and 4,518 licensed TV translators. Given
the nature of these services, we will
presume that all of these licensees
qualify as small entities under the SBA
definition. We note, however, that
under the SBA’s definition, revenue of
affiliates that are not LPTV stations
should be aggregated with the LPTV
station revenues in determining whether
a concern is small. Our estimate may
thus overstate the number of small
entities since the revenue figure on
which it is based does not include or
aggregate revenues from non-LPTV
affiliated companies. We do not have
data on revenues of TV translator or TV
booster stations, but virtually all of
these entities are also likely to have
revenues of less than $13.5 million and
thus may be categorized as small, except
to the extent that revenues of affiliated
non-translator or booster entities should
be considered.
Entities That May Be Indirectly Affected
by Proposed Rules
137. Because the rules proposed in
this NPRM pertain to the transition from
analog to digital broadcasting of fullpower television broadcast stations, we
do not believe the rules proposed will
directly affect any other entities. We
seek comment on this tentative
conclusion. Certain entities may believe
they would be affected by the proposed
rules. For example, the proposed rules
may, in the opinion of cable operators,
satellite carriers other multichannel
video programming distributors
(‘‘MVPDs’’), indirectly affect these
entities. In addition, the proposed rules
may indirectly affect electronics
equipment manufacturers. Although
such comment is not required by the
RFA, we invite comment from any small
cable operators, small satellite carriers
or other small MVPDs, as well as from
small equipment manufacturers, who
believe they might be directly affected
by our proposed rules contained in the
NPRM.
138. Cable and Other Program
Distribution. Cable system operators fall
within the SBA-recognized definition of
Cable and Other Program Distribution,
which includes all such companies
generating $13.5 million or less in
revenue annually. According to the
Census Bureau data for 1997, there were
a total of 1,311 firms that operated for
the entire year in the category of Cable
and Other Program Distribution. Of this
total, 1,180 firms had annual receipts of
under $10 million and an additional 52
firms had receipts of $10 million or
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37338
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
more, but less than $25 million. In
addition, limited preliminary census
data for 2002 indicates that the total
number of Cable and Other Program
Distribution entities increased
approximately 46 percent between 1997
and 2002. The Commission estimates
that the majority of providers in this
category of Cable and Other Program
Distribution are small businesses.
139. Cable System Operators (Rate
Regulation Standard). The Commission
has developed, with SBA’s approval, its
own definition of a small cable system
operator for the purposes of rate
regulation. Under the Commission’s
rules, a ‘‘small cable company’’ is one
serving 400,000 or fewer subscribers
nationwide. We last estimated that there
were 1,439 cable operators that qualified
as small cable companies at the end of
1995. Since then, some of those
companies may have grown to serve
more than 400,000 subscribers, and
others may have been involved in
transactions that caused them to be
combined with other cable operators.
Consequently, we estimate that there are
fewer than 1,439 small entity cable
system operators.
140. Cable System Operators
(Telecom Act Standard). The
Communications Act also contains a
size standard for a ‘‘small cable
operator,’’ which is ‘‘a cable operator
that, directly or through an affiliate,
serves in the aggregate fewer than one
percent of all subscribers in the United
States and is not affiliated with any
entity or entities whose gross annual
revenues in the aggregate exceed
$250,000,000.’’ The Commission has
determined that there are 67.7 million
subscribers in the United States.
Therefore, an operator serving fewer
than 677,000 subscribers shall be
deemed a small operator, if its annual
revenues, when combined with the total
annual revenues of all of its affiliates, do
not exceed $250 million in the
aggregate. Based on available data, we
estimate that the number of cable
operators serving 677,000 subscribers or
less totals approximately 1,450. The
Commission neither requests nor
collects information on whether cable
system operators are affiliated with
entities whose gross annual revenues
exceed $250 million, and therefore is
unable at this time to estimate more
accurately the number of cable system
operators that would qualify as small
cable operators under the size standard
contained in the Communications Act.
141. Direct Broadcast Satellite
(‘‘DBS’’) Service. DBS service is a
nationally distributed subscription
service that delivers video and audio
programming via satellite to a small
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
parabolic ‘‘dish’’ antenna at the
subscriber’s location. Because DBS
provides subscription services, DBS
falls within the SBA-recognized
definition of Cable and Other Program
Distribution. This definition provides
that a small entity is one with $13.5
million or less in annual receipts.
Currently, only three operators hold
licenses to provide DBS service, which
requires a great investment of capital for
operation. All three currently offer
subscription services. Two of these
three DBS operators, DirecTV and
EchoStar Communications Corporation
(‘‘EchoStar’’), report annual revenues
that are in excess of the threshold for a
small business. The third DBS operator,
Dominion Video Satellite, Inc.
(‘‘Dominion’’), offers religious
(Christian) programming and does not
report its annual receipts. The
Commission does not know of any
source which provides this information
and, thus, we have no way of
confirming whether Dominion qualifies
as a small business. Because DBS
service requires significant capital, we
believe it is unlikely that a small entity
as defined by the SBA would have the
financial wherewithal to become a DBS
licensee. Nevertheless, given the
absence of specific data on this point,
we acknowledge the possibility that
there are entrants in this field that may
not yet have generated $13.5 million in
annual receipts, and therefore may be
categorized as a small business, if
independently owned and operated.
142. Private Cable Operators
(‘‘PCOs’’), also known as, Satellite
Master Antenna Television (‘‘SMATV’’)
Systems. PCOs, also known as SMATV
systems or private communication
operators, are video distribution
facilities that use closed transmission
paths without using any public right-ofway. PCOs acquire video programming
and distribute it via terrestrial wiring in
urban and suburban multiple dwelling
units such as apartments and
condominiums, and commercial
multiple tenant units such as hotels and
office buildings. The SBA definition of
small entities for Cable and Other
Program Distribution Services includes
PCOs and, thus, small entities are
defined as all such companies
generating $13.5 million or less in
annual receipts. Currently, there are
more than 150 members in the
Independent Multi-Family
Communications Council (IMCC), the
trade association that represents PCOs.
Individual PCOs often serve
approximately 3,000–4,000 subscribers,
but the larger operations serve as many
as 15,000–55,000 subscribers. In total,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
PCOs currently serve approximately one
million subscribers. Because these
operators are not rate regulated, they are
not required to file financial data with
the Commission. Furthermore, we are
not aware of any privately published
financial information regarding these
operators. Based on the estimated
number of operators and the estimated
number of units served by the largest
ten PCOs, we believe that a substantial
number of PCO qualify as small entities.
143. Home Satellite Dish (‘‘HSD’’)
Service. Because HSD provides
subscription services, HSD falls within
the SBA-recognized definition of Cable
and Other Program Distribution, which
includes all such companies generating
$13.5 million or less in revenue
annually. HSD or the large dish segment
of the satellite industry is the original
satellite-to-home service offered to
consumers, and involves the home
reception of signals transmitted by
satellites operating generally in the Cband frequency. Unlike DBS, which
uses small dishes, HSD antennas are
between four and eight feet in diameter
and can receive a wide range of
unscrambled (free) programming and
scrambled programming purchased from
program packagers that are licensed to
facilitate subscribers’ receipt of video
programming. There are approximately
30 satellites operating in the C-band,
which carry over 500 channels of
programming combined; approximately
350 channels are available free of charge
and 150 are scrambled and require a
subscription. HSD is difficult to
quantify in terms of annual revenue.
HSD owners have access to program
channels placed on C-band satellites by
programmers for receipt and
distribution by MVPDs. Commission
data shows that, as of June 2005, there
were 206,358 households authorized to
receive HSD service. The Commission
has no information regarding the annual
revenue of the four C-Band distributors.
144. Wireless Cable Systems. Wireless
cable systems use the Broadband Radio
Service (‘‘BRS’’), formerly Multipoint
Distribution Service (‘‘MDS’’), and
Educational Broadband Service (‘‘EBS’’),
formerly Instructional Television Fixed
Service (‘‘ITFS’’), frequencies in the 2
GHz band to transmit video
programming and provide broadband
services to residential subscribers.
These services were originally designed
for the delivery of multichannel video
programming, similar to that of
traditional cable systems, but over the
past several years licensees have
focused their operations instead on
providing two-way high-speed Internet
access services.
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
We estimate that the number of
wireless cable subscribers is
approximately 100,000, as of March
2005. Id. Local Multipoint Distribution
Service (‘‘LMDS’’) is a fixed broadband
point-to-multipoint microwave service
that provides for two-way video
telecommunications. As previously
noted, the SBA definition of small
entities for Cable and Other Program
Distribution, which includes such
companies generating $13.5 million in
annual receipts, appears applicable to
MDS, ITFS and LMDS.
145. Wireless Cable Systems
(Commission Auction Standard). The
Commission has defined small MDS
(now BRS) and LMDS entities in the
context of Commission license auctions.
In the 1996 MDS auction, the
Commission defined a small business as
an entity that had annual average gross
revenues of less than $40 million in the
previous three calendar years. This
definition of a small entity in the
context of MDS auctions has been
approved by the SBA. In the MDS
auction, 67 bidders won 493 licenses. Of
the 67 auction winners, 61 claimed
status as a small business. At this time,
the Commission estimates that of the 61
small business MDS auction winners, 48
remain small business licensees. In
addition to the 48 small businesses that
hold BTA authorizations, there are
approximately 392 incumbent MDS
licensees that have gross revenues that
are not more than $40 million and are
thus considered small entities. MDS
licensees and wireless cable operators
that did not participate in the MDS
auction must rely on the SBA definition
of small entities for Cable and Other
Program Distribution. Information
available to us indicates that there are
approximately 850 of these licensees
and operators that do not generate
revenue in excess of $13.5 million
annually. Therefore, we estimate that
there are approximately 850 small MDS
(or BRS) providers as defined by the
SBA and the Commission’s auction
rules.
146. Educational institutions are
included in this analysis as small
entities; however, the Commission has
not defined a small business size
standard for ITFS (now EBS). We
estimate that there are currently 2,032
ITFS (or EBS) licensees, and all but 100
of these licenses are held by educational
institutions. Thus, the Commission
estimates that at least 1,932 ITFS
licensees are small businesses.
147. In the 1998 and 1999 LMDS
auctions, the Commission defined a
small business as an entity that had
annual average gross revenues of less
than $40 million in the previous three
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
calendar years. Moreover, the
Commission added an additional
classification for a ‘‘very small
business,’’ which was defined as an
entity that had annual average gross
revenues of less than $15 million in the
previous three calendar years. These
definitions of ‘‘small business’’ and
‘‘very small business’’ in the context of
the LMDS auctions have been approved
by the SBA. In the first LMDS auction,
104 bidders won 864 licenses. Of the
104 auction winners, 93 claimed status
as small or very small businesses. In the
LMDS re-auction, 40 bidders won 161
licenses. Based on this information, we
believe that the number of small LMDS
licenses will include the 93 winning
bidders in the first auction and the 40
winning bidders in the re-auction, for a
total of 133 small entity LMDS
providers as defined by the SBA and the
Commission’s auction rules.
148. Open Video Systems (‘‘OVS’’). In
1996, Congress established the open
video system (‘‘OVS’’) framework, one
of four statutorily recognized options for
the provision of video programming
services by local exchange carriers
(‘‘LECs’’). The OVS framework provides
opportunities for the distribution of
video programming other than through
cable systems. Because OVS operators
provide subscription services, OVS falls
within the SBA-recognized definition of
Cable and Other Program Distribution
Services, which provides that a small
entity is one with $13.5 million or less
in annual receipts. The Commission has
certified 25 OVS operators with some
now providing service. Broadband
service providers (‘‘BSPs’’) are currently
the only significant holders of OVS
certifications or local OVS franchises.
As of June 2005, BSPs served
approximately 1.4 million subscribers,
representing 1.5 percent of all MVPD
households. Affiliates of Residential
Communications Network, Inc.
(‘‘RCN’’), which serves about 371,000
subscribers as of June 2005, is currently
the largest BSP and 14th largest MVPD.
RCN received approval to operate OVS
systems in New York City, Boston,
Washington, DC and other areas. The
Commission does not have financial
information regarding the entities
authorized to provide OVS, some of
which may not yet be operational. We
thus believe that at least some of the
OVS operators may qualify as small
entities.
149. Electronics Equipment
Manufacturers. The rules adopted in
this proceeding may indirectly affect
manufacturers of digital receiving
equipment and other types of consumer
electronics equipment. The appropriate
small business size standard is that
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37339
which the SBA has established for
manufacturers of radio and television
broadcasting and wireless
communications equipment. This
category encompasses entities that
primarily manufacture radio, television,
and wireless communications
equipment. Under this standard, firms
are considered small if they have 750 or
fewer employees. Census Bureau data
for 2002 indicate that, for that year,
there were a total of 1,041
establishments in this category. Of
those, 1,023 had employment under
1,000. Given the above, the Commission
estimates that the great majority of
equipment manufacturers are small
businesses.
D. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping and Other Compliance
Requirements
150. The proposals set forth in this
NPRM, if adopted, would impose
mandatory compliance and reporting
requirements on full-power television
broadcast stations, including requiring
that such stations: (1) Must cease analog
broadcasting on or before the February
17, 2009 transition date; (2) if they do
not have an existing construction permit
for their final, DTV facility, or if they
need to modify their existing
construction permit, must file an
application for a new or modified
construction permit for their final, DTV
facility; (3) must construct their DTV
facility by the construction deadline
proposed for them; (4) must file a form
with the Commission detailing their
current transition status, the additional
steps necessary in order to be prepared
for digital-only operation on February
17, 2009, and a timeline for making
those steps; and (5) must populate, and
update as necessary, the Event
Information Tables (‘‘EITs’’) in PSIP
data with accurate information about
each event, in accordance with the
current version of the ATSC PSIP
standard, A/65–C.
151. In addition, certain proposals set
forth in this NPRM, if adopted, would
provide for voluntary compliance and
reporting requirements. Because these
voluntary requirements may afford
small television broadcast stations the
opportunity for regulatory flexibility
and reduced burdens, they are
discussed in Section E. of this IRFA.
152. Mandatory Termination of
Analog Television Broadcasting. By
statute, after the February 17, 2009
transition date, all full-power television
broadcast stations must transmit only in
digital signals, and may no longer
transmit analog signals. This statutory
mandate affords the Commission no
discretion to offer any regulatory
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
37340
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
flexibility to small television
broadcasters concerning the mandatory
analog turn-off. Rather, to implement
this statutory mandate, the Commission
must ensure that all full-power
television broadcast stations cease
analog broadcasting as of the February
17, 2009 transition date.
153. Applications for New or Modified
Construction Permits. Under the current
rules, stations that need to construct or
modify DTV facilities must file
construction permit or modification
applications. Commercial stations must
file FCC Form 301 and NCE stations
must file FCC Form 340. Stations may
file an application to modify their
authority on their current DTV channel
at any time, provided they do not
violate the terms of the Commission’s
filing freeze.
154. According to the NPRM, 634
stations will not be using their currently
authorized DTV channel for posttransition operations and will, therefore,
need to file an application to construct
their final, DTV facility. In addition, if
any of the 1,178 stations that will use
their currently authorized DTV channel
for post-transition operations need to
change their DTV facilities, e.g., because
if they do not have an authorization for
their intended operations, then such
stations will need to file a modification
application. Thus, both these groups of
stations will need to file applications for
their final, post-transition facilities.
155. Given the number of stations that
will need to file CP or modification
applications and the fast-approaching
transition date, the NPRM proposes to
offer expedited processing to a station
applying for a CP to build or modify its
post-transition channel, provided that
its application (i) does not seek to
expand the station’s noise-limited
service contour in any direction beyond
that established by the new DTV Table;
(ii) specifies facilities that match or
closely approximate those new DTV
Table facilities (i.e., if the station is
unable to build precisely the facilities
specified in the new DTV Table, then it
must apply for facilities that deviate no
more than five percent from those new
DTV Table facilities with respect to
predicted population); and (iii) is filed
within 45 days of the effective date of
Section 73.616 of the rules adopted in
the Report and Order in this proceeding.
The NPRM tentatively concludes that it
will not accept applications to expand
post-transition facilities until it has
completed processing the applications
to build authorized facilities. The NPRM
also tentatively concludes to adopt a
new 0.5 percent interference standard to
apply to maximization applications and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
to new channel allotments after the
transition.
156. Construction deadlines for DTV
facilities. The NPRM proposes deadlines
for all full-power television broadcast
stations to complete construction of
their final, DTV facilities in order to
ensure that DTV stations will be
providing service on their final, posttransition channels by the February 17,
2009 transition date. The NPRM
proposes construction deadlines based
on a station’s channel assignment for
pre- and post-transition operation, and
other circumstances affecting the
station’s ability to complete final, posttransition facilities. First, the NPRM
proposes that February 17, 2009 will be
the construction deadline for stations
whose DTV channel for pre-transition
operation is not the same as their
channel for post-transition use. These
are stations that will be starting over
with a new channel for DTV service.
Second, for stations whose posttransition channel is the same as their
pre-transition channel, the NPRM
proposes to require completion of
stations’ post-transition facilities by the
deadlines established for them in the
Construction Deadline Extension Order
and Use-or-Lose Order. Most stations
(whose post-transition channel is the
same as their pre-transition channel)
that received a grant of their extension
request or use-or-lose waiver request
were provided six months from the
release date of the Construction
Deadline Extension Order or Use-orLose Order, whichever is applicable, to
complete construction of their final,
DTV (post-transition) facilities. The
other stations (whose post-transition
channel is the same as their pretransition channel) that received a grant
of their extension request or use-or-lose
waiver request were provided until
February 17, 2009 to complete
construction of their final, DTV (posttransition) facilities, because they faced
unique technical challenges, such as
needing to switch their top-mounted
analog transmitter with their sidemounted digital transmitter. Unlike the
first group, stations whose posttransition channel is the same as their
pre-transition channel have long been
assigned the channel that they will use
for post-transition operations. Third,
notwithstanding the first two groups,
the NPRM proposes that February 17,
2009 will be the construction deadline
for stations with side-mounted digital
antennas or similar situations in which
the operation of their analog service
prevents the completion of their full,
authorized digital facilities.
157. The NPRM also proposes to limit
the situations in which stations may
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
obtain more time to satisfy the proposed
new construction deadlines for
completion of final, DTV facilities. For
requests for additional time to construct
DTV facilities filed before February 17,
2009 (but after the effective date of the
proposed new rule), the NPRM proposes
to revise and apply Section 73.624(d) of
the rules. Specifically, the proposed
Section 73.624(d), if adopted, would no
longer grant stations additional time to
construct because of equipment delays,
absent extraordinary circumstances. The
proposed rule would also require a
stronger demonstration of financial
hardship than is now required. The
proposed financial hardship standard
would require the licensee or permittee
of a station to show that it is (1) the
subject of a bankruptcy or receivership
proceeding, or (2) experiencing severe
financial hardship, as defined by
negative cash flow for the past three
years. Stations seeking an extension
based upon financial considerations
under this new test would either (1)
submit proof that they have filed for
bankruptcy or that a receiver has been
appointed, or (2) submit an audited
financial statement for the previous
three years. All such stations also would
be required to submit a schedule of
when they expect to complete
construction. As is currently required by
the rule, stations making such requests
must electronically file FCC Form 337.
With respect to a deadline of February
17, 2009 or later, the NPRM proposes to
apply Section 73.3598 of the rules,
which now applies to DTV singletons,
analog TV, and other broadcast services.
Stations must file a notification to
inform the Commission of the
circumstances that it believes should
toll its construction period.
158. Transition Status Form. The
NPRM proposes that every full-power
television broadcast station must file a
form with the Commission that details
(1) the current status of the station’s
digital transition; (2) the additional
steps, if any, the station needs to take to
be prepared for the switch-over
deadline; and (3) a plan for how it
intends to meet that deadline. These
filings will be posted on the
Commission’s website. These forms will
assist the Commission, industry, and the
public in assessing progress and making
plans for the digital switchover date.
The form will provide information on
the status of each station’s construction
of final, DTV facilities, allowing the
Commission, industry, and the public to
track the progress of the DTV transition.
159. Program System and Information
Protocol (‘‘PSIP’’) standard. The NPRM
proposes to update Section 73.682(d) to
reflect the revisions to the ATSC
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Program System and Information
Protocol (‘‘PSIP’’) standard since the
Second DTV Periodic Report and Order.
The current version of the ATSC PSIP
standard is A/65–C. PSIP data is
transmitted along with a station’s DTV
signal and provides DTV receivers with
information about the station and what
is being broadcast. PSIP data provides a
method for DTV receivers to identify a
DTV station and to determine how a
receiver can tune to it. For any given
station, the PSIP data transmitted along
with the digital signal identifies both its
DTV channel number and its analog
channel number (referred to as the
‘‘major’’ channel number), thereby
making it easy for viewers to tune to the
station’s DTV channel even if they only
know the station’s major channel
number. In addition, PSIP data tells the
receiver whether multiple program
streams are being broadcast and, if so,
how to find them. It also identifies
whether the programs are closed
captioned, conveys available V-chip
information, and provides program
information, among other things. The
Commission has recognized the utility
that the ATSC PSIP standard offers for
both broadcasters and consumers.
160. This new revision to the ATSC
standard further enhances the PSIP
standard and support for delivery of
data. The updated ATSC PSIP standard
now requires broadcasters to populate
the EITs with accurate information
about each event and to update the EIT
if more accurate information becomes
available. Currently, many broadcasters
provide only general information in the
EIT tables. For example, a network
affiliate may provide ‘‘network
programming’’ as the descriptor for the
majority of its program offerings.
E. Steps Taken to Minimize Significant
Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
161. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.
162. As previously noted, the
Commission has no discretion to offer
any regulatory flexibility to small
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
television broadcasters concerning the
mandatory analog turn-off on the
February 17, 2009 transition date.
Rather, to implement this statutory
mandate, the Commission must ensure
that all full-power television broadcast
stations, including small stations, cease
analog broadcasting as of the February
17, 2009 transition date.
163. The NPRM, however, does
propose opportunities for regulatory
flexibility with respect to the other
mandatory compliance requirements.
164. With respect to applications for
post-transition facilities, the NPRM
proposes to offer expedited processing
(as discussed above). It is each station’s
responsibility to ensure that it can begin
operations on its post-transition channel
no later than the deadline for the
transition on February 17, 2009.
Stations also have the responsibility to
file their applications in sufficient time
before the deadline so that they may be
granted by the Commission. This option
may well benefit smaller entities.
165. With respect to the proposed
construction deadlines to build final,
post-transition facilities, the NPRM
proposes to offer a variety of
opportunities for regulatory flexibility if
it would facilitate the transition and
ensure that all full-power stations meet
the February 17, 2009 transition date.
166. While proposing to establish a
stricter standard for requests for
extension of time to construct DTV
facilities, the NPRM also proposes to
eliminate the requirement for some
stations that they build pre-transition
DTV facilities on channels that are not
their post-transition channel. This will
help many small stations facing
financial challenges to complete
construction of DTV facilities while also
ensuring that broadcasters continue to
focus on the timely construction of the
facilities necessary to transition away
from analog transmission by the
transition date. The NPRM also asks
whether it should afford small
television broadcasters additional time
to construct DTV facilities. The NPRM
also proposes to allow stations to
operate on newly allotted posttransition facilities before the transition
deadline provided they would not
interfere with existing, pre-transition
service.
167. The NPRM also requests
comment on whether to permit stations
to build less than their full, authorized
post-transition facilities by the relevant
construction deadline, provided these
stations at least serve the same area and
population that receive their current
analog TV and DTV service so that overthe-air viewers will not lose TV service.
In particular, if such relief is not
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37341
afforded to all stations, the NPRM asks
whether to afford such relief to small
television broadcasters because of the
unique challenges they may face in
completing their transition.
168. The NPRM requests comment on
whether to allow stations to temporarily
remain on their pre-transition DTV
channel (even though it is not their
post-transition channel) if: (i) They
serve at least the same area and
population that receives their current
analog TV service so that over-the-air
viewers will not lose TV service; (ii)
they do not cause impermissible
interference to other stations or prevent
other stations from making their
transition; and (iii) doing so would
facilitate the transition. Stations making
such requests would do so in
accordance with the rules for STA. This
opportunity may afford additional
regulatory relief to small television
broadcasters.
169. To facilitate the construction of,
and commencement of operations on,
post-transition facilities, the NPRM also
examines the circumstances in which a
station may reduce or terminate its
analog service to facilitate construction
of post-transition facilities. This
opportunity may afford additional
regulatory relief to small television
broadcasters. The NPRM also considers
whether and, if so, under what
circumstances it should accept new
requests by stations to return their pretransition-only DTV channel (i.e., a DTV
channel that is not their final, posttransition channel) before the end of the
transition and ‘‘flash cut’’ from their
analog channel to their post-transition
channel. This flash-cut option may
provide financial relief to small stations,
such as satellite stations, by freeing
stations to focus their efforts on
completion of their final, post-transition
facilities.
170. With respect to the proposed
updating of Section 73.682(d) to reflect
the new revisions to the ATSC PSIP
standard, the NPRM seeks comment on
the burden that compliance with the
new standard, A/65–C, would place on
small broadcasters, in particular.
171. Consistent with the statutory
mandate for full-power TV broadcast
stations to cease analog broadcasting by
February 17, 2009, as well as with
broadcasters’ obligation to provide and
maintain the best possible TV service to
the public, broadcasters are encouraged
to suggest alternative proposals that
would avoid the imposition of
significant and unreasonable burdens on
small TV broadcasters.
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
37342
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
F. Federal Rules Which Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the
Commission’s Proposals
172. None.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
173. This NPRM has been analyzed
with respect to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (‘‘PRA’’), and
contains proposed new and modified
information collection requirements,
including the following proposals: (1)
Applications detailing stations’ plans
for completing their transitions; (2)
Applications to construct or modify
post-transition facilities (using FCC
Forms 301 and 340); (3) Requests to
reduce analog TV service; (4) Requests
to terminate analog TV service; (5)
Requests to flash cut; (6) Requests for
STA to use analog translators to offset
loss of analog service; (7) Requests for
extension of time to construct (using
FCC Form 337), or to toll the
construction deadline for, DTV
facilities; (8) Requests to transition early
to their post-transition channel; (9)
Requests for STA to temporarily remain
on their in-core pre-transition DTV
channel; (10) Requests for STA to build
less than full, authorized post-transition
facilities by the deadline; (11)
Applications for a license to cover posttransition facilities (using FCC Form 302
DTV); and (12) PSIP requirement to
populate the Event Information Tables
(‘‘EITs’’) with accurate information
about each event and to update the EIT
if more accurate information becomes
available. The Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
the Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) to comment on the proposed
information collection requirements
contained in this NPRM, as required by
the PRA.
174. Written comments on the PRA
proposed information collection
requirements must be submitted by the
public, the OMB, and other interested
parties on or before September 7, 2007.
Comments should address: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimates; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
In addition, pursuant to the Small
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
we seek specific comment on how we
might ‘‘further reduce the information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees.’’
175. Further Information. For
additional information concerning the
PRA proposed information collection
requirements contained in this NPRM,
contact Cathy Williams at 202–418–
2918, or via the Internet to
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
B. Ex Parte Rules
176. Permit-But-Disclose. This
proceeding will be treated as a ‘‘permitbut-disclose’’ proceeding subject to the
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ requirements
under section 1.1206(b) of the
Commission’s rules. Ex parte
presentations are permissible if
disclosed in accordance with
Commission rules, except during the
Sunshine Agenda period when
presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are
generally prohibited. Persons making
oral ex parte presentations are reminded
that a memorandum summarizing a
presentation must contain a summary of
the substance of the presentation and
not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one-or twosentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally
required. Additional rules pertaining to
oral and written presentations are set
forth in section 1.1206(b).
C. Filing Requirements
177. Comments and Replies. Pursuant
to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, interested parties
may file comments and reply comments
on or before the dates indicated on the
first page of this document. Comments
may be filed using: (1) The
Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System (‘‘ECFS’’), (2) the Federal
Government’s eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
by filing paper copies.
178. Electronic Filers: Comments may
be filed electronically using the Internet
by accessing the ECFS: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Filers should
follow the instructions provided on the
Web site for submitting comments. For
ECFS filers, if multiple docket or
rulemaking numbers appear in the
caption of this proceeding, filers must
transmit one electronic copy of the
comments for each docket or
rulemaking number referenced in the
caption. In completing the transmittal
screen, filers should include their full
name, U.S. Postal Service mailing
address, and the applicable docket or
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
rulemaking number. Parties may also
submit an electronic comment by
Internet e-mail. To get filing
instructions, filers should send an email to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the
following words in the body of the
message, ‘‘get form.’’ A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
179. Paper Filers: Parties who choose
to file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number. Filings
can be sent by hand or messenger
delivery, by commercial overnight
courier, or by first-class or overnight
U.S. Postal Service mail (although we
continue to experience delays in
receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• The Commission’s contractor will
receive hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours
at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All
hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail should be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington DC 20554.
180. Availability of Documents.
Comments, reply comments, and ex
parte submissions will be available for
public inspection during regular
business hours in the FCC Reference
Center, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CYA257, Washington, DC, 20554. These
documents will also be available via
ECFS. Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/
or Adobe Acrobat.
181. Accessibility Information. To
request information in accessible
formats (computer diskettes, large print,
audio recording, and Braille), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the FCC’s
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202)
418–0432 (TTY). This document can
also be downloaded in Word and
Portable Document Format (PDF) at:
https://www.fcc.gov.
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
VII. Ordering Clauses
182. Accordingly, It is ordered that
pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 7,
301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 312, 316,
318, 319, 324, 325, 336, and 337 of the
Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C
151, 154(i) and (j), 157, 301, 302a, 303,
307, 308, 309, 312, 316, 318, 319, 324,
325, 336, and 337 that notice is hereby
given of the proposals and tentative
conclusions described in this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, including the
proposed amendments to Part 73 of the
Commission’s rules.
183. It is further ordered that the
Reference Information Center,
Consumer Information Bureau, shall
send a copy of this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, including the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Digital television, Radio.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
Proposed Rule Changes
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
2. Add a new § 73.616 to read as
follows:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
§ 73.616 Post-transition DTV station
interference protection.
(a) A petition to add a new channel
to the post-transition DTV Table of
Allotments contained in § 73.622(i) of
this subpart will not be accepted unless
it meets: the DTV-to-DTV geographic
spacing requirements of § 73.623(d)(2)
with respect to all existing DTV
allotments in the post-transition DTV
Table; the principle community
coverage requirements of § 73.625(a);
the Class A TV and digital Class A TV
protection requirements in paragraph
(d) of this section; the land mobile
protection requirements of § 73.623(e);
and the FM radio protection
requirement of § 73.623(f). The reference
coordinates of a post-transition DTV
allotment shall be the authorized
transmitter site, or, where such a
transmitter site is not available for use
as a reference point, the coordinates as
designated in the FCC order creating or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
modifying the post-transition DTV Table
of Allotments.
(b) An application for a new posttransition DTV broadcast station or for
changes in an authorized post-transition
DTV station will not be accepted for
filing unless it protects all land mobile
operation on channels 14–20 in
accordance with § 73.623(e) and all
other post-transition DTV stations from
interference in excess of the limits
established in this section. An
application must not cause interference
to more than: the greater of either 0.5
percent the population served by the
other station or the amount of
interference already predicted to be
caused by the applicant’s authorized
facilities.
(1) The protected facilities of a posttransition DTV allotment shall be the
facilities (effective radiated power,
antenna height and antenna directional
radiation pattern, if any) authorized by
a construction permit or license, or,
where such an authorization is not
available for establishing reference
facilities, the facilities designated in the
FCC order creating or modifying the
post-transition DTV Table of
Allotments.
(2) For evaluating compliance with
this requirement, interference to
populations served is to be predicted
based on the 2000 census population
data and otherwise according to the
procedure set forth in OET Bulletin No.
69, including population served within
service areas determined in accordance
with § 73.622(e), consideration of
whether F(50,10) undesired signals will
exceed the following desired-toundesired (D/U) signal ratios, assumed
use of a directional receiving antenna,
and use of the terrain dependent
Longley-Rice point-to-point propagation
model. Copies of OET Bulletin No. 69
may be inspected during normal
business hours at the: Federal
Communications Commission, Room
CY-C203, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Reference Information Center,
Washington, DC 20554. These
documents are also available through
the Internet on the FCC Home Page at
https://www.fcc.gov. The threshold levels
at which interference is considered to
occur are:
(i) For co-channel stations, the D/U
ratio is +15 dB. This value is only valid
at locations where the signal-to-noise
ratio is 28 dB or greater. At the edge of
the noise-limited service area, where the
signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio is 16 dB, this
value is +23 dB. At locations where the
S/N ratio is greater than 16 dB but less
than 28 dB, D/U values are computed
from the following formula:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
37343
D/U = 15+10log10[1.0/(1.0–10-x/10)]
Where x = S/N–15.19 (minimum signal to
noise ratio)
(ii) For interference from a lower firstadjacent channel, the D/U ratio is -28
dB.
(iii) For interference from a upper
first-adjacent channel, the D/U ratio is
-26 dB.
(c) Due to the frequency spacing that
exists between Channels 4 and 5,
between Channels 6 and 7, and between
Channels 13 and 14, the minimum
adjacent channel technical criteria
specified in this section shall not be
applicable to these pairs of channels
(see § 73.603(a)).
(d) A petition to add a new channel
to the post-transition DTV Table or a
post-transition DTV station application
that proposes to expand its allotted or
authorized coverage area in any
direction will not be accepted if it is
predicted to cause interference to a
Class A TV station or to a digital Class
A TV station authorized pursuant to
subpart J of this part, within the
protected contour defined in § 73.6010
of this part.
(1) Interference is predicted to occur
if the ratio in dB of the field strength of
a Class A TV station at its protected
contour to the field strength resulting
from the facilities proposed in the DTV
application (calculated using the
appropriate F(50,10) chart from Figure
9a, 10a, or 10c of § 73.699 of this part)
fails to meet the D/U signal ratios for
‘‘DTV-into-analog TV’’ specified in
§ 73.623(c)(2).
(2) Interference is predicted to occur
if the ratio in dB of the field strength of
a digital Class A TV station at its
protected contour to the field strength
resulting from the facilities proposed in
the DTV application (calculated using
the appropriate F(50,10) chart from
Figure 9a, 10a, or 10c of § 73.699 of this
part) fails to meet the D/U signal ratios
specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section.
(3) In support of a request for waiver
of the interference protection
requirements of this section, an
applicant for a post-transition DTV
broadcast station may make full use of
terrain shielding and Longley-Rice
terrain dependent propagation methods
to demonstrate that the proposed facility
would not be likely to cause
interference to Class A TV stations.
Guidance on using the Longley-Rice
methodology is provided in OET
Bulletin No. 69, which is available
through the Internet at https://
www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/
bulletins/#69.
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
37344
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Note to § 73.616: When this rule was
adopted, the filing freeze announced in an
August 2004 public notice (19 FCC Rcd
14810 (MB 2004)) remained in effect. For a
short period of time after the filing freeze is
lifted, until a date to be announced by a
Media Bureau Public Notice, applicants must
protect Appendix B facilities in addition to
any authorized facilities required to be
protected pursuant to this rule section.
2. Amend § 73.623 by adding a note
to paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 73.623 DTV applications and changes to
DTV allotments.
*
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
Note to paragraph (a): Petitions for rule
making and applications seeking facilities
that will operate after the end of the DTV
transition must also comply with § 73.616.
3. Amend § 73.624 by adding
paragraph (d)(1)(v) and revising
paragraph (d)(3) to read as follows:
§ 73.624 Digital television broadcast
stations.
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(v) February 17, 2009 is the deadline
for the completion of construction of
post-transition (DTV) facilities for all
commercial and noncommercial
television stations whose post-transition
digital channel is different from their
pre-transition digital channel. For
purposes of this construction deadline,
the post-transition facilities to be
constructed are those defined by the
new DTV Table of Allotments and
accompanying Appendix B, established
by the Seventh Report and Order in MB
Docket No. 87–268 and codified at 47
CFR 73.622(i).
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Authority delegated. (i) Authority
is delegated to the Chief, Media Bureau
to grant an extension of time of up to six
months beyond the relevant
construction deadline specified in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section upon
demonstration by the DTV licensee or
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Jul 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
permittee that failure to meet that
construction deadline is due to
circumstances that are either
unforeseeable or beyond the licensee’s
control where the licensee has taken all
reasonable steps to resolve the problem
expeditiously.
(ii) Such circumstances may include,
but shall not be limited to:
(A) Inability to construct and place in
operation a facility necessary for
transmitting digital television, such as a
tower, because of delays in obtaining
zoning or FAA approvals, or similar
constraints; or
(B) Where the licensee or permittee is
currently the subject of a bankruptcy or
receivership proceeding, or is
experiencing severe financial hardship
as defined by negative cash flow for the
past three years.
(iii) The Bureau may grant no more
than two extension requests upon
delegated authority. Subsequent
extension requests shall be referred to
the Commission. The Bureau may deny
extension requests upon delegated
authority.
(iv) Applications for extension of time
shall be filed no earlier than 90 and no
later than 60 days prior to the relevant
construction deadline, absent a showing
of sufficient reasons for filing within
less than 60 days of the relevant
construction deadline.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Revise § 73.682(d) to read as
follows:
§ 73.682
TV transmission standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Digital broadcast television
transmission standard. Effective
November 6, 2007, transmission of
digital broadcast television (DTV)
signals shall comply with the standards
for such transmissions set forth in ATSC
A/52: ‘‘ATSC Standard Digital Audio
Compression (AC–3)’’ (incorporated by
reference, see § 73.8000), ATSC Doc. A/
53, Revision E with Amendment 1 and
Amendment 2: ‘‘ATSC Digital
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Television Standard,’’ (September 13,
2006) except for Section 5.1.2
(‘‘Compression format constraints’’) of
Annex A (‘‘Video Systems
Characteristics’’) and the phrase ‘‘see
Table A3’’ in Section 5.1.1. Table A2
and Section 5.1.3 Table A4
(incorporated by reference, see
§ 73.8000), and ATSC A/65C: ‘‘ATSC
Program and System Information
Protocol for Terrestrial Broadcast and
Cable,’’ (Revision C with Amendment 1)
May 9, 2006 (incorporated by reference,
see § 73.8000). Although not
incorporated by reference, licensees
may also consult ATSC Doc. A/54,
Recommended Practice, Guide to Use of
the ATSC Digital Television Standard,
including Corrigendum No. 1 (December
4, 2003, Corrigendum No. 1 December
20, 2006), and ATSC Doc. A/69,
Recommended Practice PSIP
Implementation Guidelines for
Broadcasters (June 25, 2002) (Secs. 4, 5,
303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1068,
1082 (47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 303)).
5. Revise § 73.8000(b)(2) and (3) to
read as follows:
§ 73.8000
Incorporation by reference.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) ATSC A/53: ‘‘ATSC Digital
Television Standard,’’ dated August 7,
2001, Revision E, with Amendment 1
dated April 18, 2006 and Amendment 2
dated September 13, 2006, IBR
approved for § 73.682, except for section
5.1.2 of Annex A, and the phrase ‘‘see
Table A–3’’ in section 5.1.1. Table A2
and section 5.1.3 Table A4.
(3) ATSC A/65C: ‘‘ATSC Program and
System Information Protocol for
Terrestrial Broadcast and Cable,’’
(Revision C) January 2, 2006, with
Amendment 1 dated May 9, 2006, and
IBR approved for § 73.682, IBR
approved for §§ 73.9000–73.9001.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–12905 Filed 7–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\09JYP2.SGM
09JYP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 130 (Monday, July 9, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37310-37344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12905]
[[Page 37309]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Federal Communications Commission
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
47 CFR Part 73
Third Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting
the Conversion to Digital Television; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 130 / Monday, July 9, 2007 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 37310]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 07-91; FCC 07-70]
Third Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies
Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document begins the Commission's third periodic review of
the transition of the nation's broadcast television system from analog
to digital television. It provides a progress report on the DTV
transition and considers the procedures and rule changes necessary to
ensure that broadcasters timely complete their transitions. Congress
has mandated that after February 17, 2009, full-power television
broadcast stations must transmit only digital signals, and may no
longer transmit analog signals. This document considers how to ensure
that broadcasters complete construction of their final, post-transition
(digital) facilities by the statutory deadline.
DATES: Comments are due on or before August 8, 2007; reply comments are
due on or before August 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by MB Docket No. 07-91,
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Communications Commission's Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Filers should follow the instructions provided
on the website for submitting comments. For ECFS filers, if multiple
docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the caption of this proceeding,
filers must transmit one electronic copy of the comments for each
docket or rulemaking number referenced in the caption. In completing
the transmittal screen, filers should include their full name, U.S.
Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking
number.
E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov. To get filing instructions, filers
should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the following words
in the body of the message, ``get form.'' A sample form and directions
will be sent in response.
Mail: Filings can be sent by commercial overnight courier
or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although we
continue to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail).
Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four
copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. All
filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Commercial overnight mail
(other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be
sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal
Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to
445 12th Street, SW., Washington DC 20554.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery. The Commission's contractor will receive hand-
delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's
Secretary at 236 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC
20002. The filing hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand
deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. Parties who
choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each
filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the
caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two additional copies
for each additional docket or rulemaking number. All filings must be
addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
Accessibility Information: Contact the FCC to request
information in accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print,
audio recording, and Braille) by sending an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or
calling the FCC's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This document can also be
downloaded in Word and Portable Document Format (PDF) at: https://
www.fcc.gov.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. Comments, reply comments, and ex
parte submissions will be available for public inspection during
regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., CY-A257, Washington,
DC, 20554. These documents will also be available via ECFS. Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe
Acrobat. For detailed instructions for submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information on this
proceeding, contact Evan Baranoff, Evan.Baranoff@fcc.gov of the Media
Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418-2120 or Eloise Gore,
Eloise.Gore@fcc.gov, of the Media Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418-
2120; Gordon Godfrey, Gordon.Godfrey@fcc.gov, of the Media Bureau,
Engineering Division, (202) 418-7000; Nazifa Sawez,
Nazifa.Sawez@fcc.gov, of the Media Bureau, Video Division, (202) 418-
1600; or Alan Stillwell, Alan.Stillwell@fcc.gov, of the Office of
Engineering and Technology, (202) 418-2470.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 07-70, adopted on April 25, 2007, and
released on May 18, 2007. The full text of this document is available
for public inspection and copying during regular business hours in the
FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. These documents will also
be available via ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will
be available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.)
The complete text may be purchased from the Commission's copy
contractor, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554.
To request this document in accessible formats (computer diskettes,
large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an e-mail to
fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission's Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
This document has been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA''), and contains proposed new and modified
information collection requirements, including the following proposals:
(1) Applications detailing stations' plans for completing their
transitions; (2) Applications to construct or modify post-transition
facilities (using FCC Forms 301 and 340); (3) Requests to reduce analog
TV service; (4) Requests to terminate analog TV service; (5) Requests
to flash cut; (6) Requests for STA to use analog translators to offset
[[Page 37311]]
loss of analog service; (7) Requests for extension of time to construct
(using FCC Form 337), or to toll the construction deadline for, DTV
facilities; (8) Requests to transition early to their post-transition
channel; (9) Requests for STA to temporarily remain on their in-core
pre-transition DTV channel; (10) Requests for STA to build less than
full, authorized post-transition facilities by the deadline; (11)
Applications for a license to cover post-transition facilities (using
FCC Form 302 DTV); and (12) PSIP requirement to populate the Event
Information Tables (``EITs'') with accurate information about each
event and to update the EIT if more accurate information becomes
available. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') to comment on the proposed information
collection requirements contained in this document, as required by the
PRA.
Written comments on the PRA proposed information collection
requirements must be submitted by the public, the OMB, and other
interested parties on or before September 7, 2007. Comments should
address: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimates; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. In
addition, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
we seek specific comment on how we might ``further reduce the
information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees.''
In addition to filing comments with the Office of the Secretary, a
copy of any comments on the proposed information collection
requirements contained herein should be submitted to Cathy Williams,
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St, SW., Room 1-C823,
Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov;
and also to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB, Room 10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, or via Internet to Jasmeet--K.--
Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or via fax at 202-395-5167. If you would like to
obtain a coy of this information collection, you may do so by visiting
the FCC's PRA webpage at https://www.fcc.gov/omd/pra.
Further Information. For additional information concerning the PRA
proposed information collection requirements contained in this
document, contact Cathy Williams at 202-418-2918, or via the Internet
to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov or PRA@fcc.gov.
OMB Control Number: 3060-0027.
Title: Application for Construction Permit for Commercial Broadcast
Station, FCC Form 301.
Form Number: FCC Form 301.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities.
Number of Respondents: 4,278.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement; Third
party disclosure requirement.
Estimated Time Per Response: 2 to 4 hours.
Total Annual Burden: 10,513 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $51,350,347.
Nature of Response: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007, the Commission adopted a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), In the Matter of the Third Periodic
Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion
to Digital Television, MB Docket No. 07-91, FCC 07-70. The NPRM
proposes that commercial television stations must use the proposed
revised FCC Form 301 when applying for post-transition facilities, when
requesting to reduce analog TV service and when requesting to
transition early to their post-transition channel. FCC Form 301 is
being revised to accommodate the filing of post-transition
applications.
FCC Form 301 is used to apply for authority to construct a new
commercial AM, FM, or TV broadcast station, to make changes in existing
facilities of such a station, and may be used to request a change of a
station's community of license by AM and non-reserved band FM
permittees and licensees. In addition, FM licensees or permittees may
request, by filing an application on FCC Form 301, upgrades on adjacent
and co-channels, modifications to adjacent channels of the same class,
and downgrades to adjacent channels.
OMB Control Number: 3060-0029.
Title: Application for TV Broadcast Station License, FCC Form 302
TV; Application for DTV Broadcast Station License, FCC Form 302-DTV,
Application for Construction Permit for Reserved Channel Noncommercial
Educational Broadcast Station, FCC Form 340; Application for Authority
to Construct or Make Changes in an FM Translator or FM Booster Station,
FCC Form 349.
Form Number(s): FCC Form 302 TV; FCC Form 302-DTV; FCC Form 340;
FCC Form 349.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions; State, local or tribal government.
Number of Respondents: 4,325.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement;
Recordkeeping requirement; Third party disclosure requirement.
Estimated Time per Response: 2 to 4 hours.
Total Annual Burden: 12,150 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $21,091,625.
Nature of Response: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007, the Commission adopted a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), In the Matter of the Third Periodic
Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion
to Digital Television, MB Docket No. 07-91, FCC 07-70, to consider the
procedures and rule changes necessary to complete the nation's
transition to DTV, including how best to ensure that broadcasters
complete construction of their facilities on their final, post-
transition (digital) channel by the statutory deadline.
The NPRM proposes that Noncommercial Education (NCE) television
stations must use the proposed revised FCC Form 340 when applying for
authority to construct or modify post-transition facilities; when
requesting to reduce analog TV service and when requesting to
transition early to their post-transition channel. Therefore, FCC Form
340 is being revised to accommodate the filing of applications to
construct or modify post-transition facilities.
The NPRM also proposes that stations that have applied to construct
or modify post-transition facilities must use the Form 302--DTV to
obtain a new or modified station license to cover those post-transition
facilities.
In addition, the Commission is consolidating information collection
OMB Control Number 3060-0837
[[Page 37312]]
(Application for DTV Broadcast Station License, FCC 302-DTV) into this
collection OMB Control Number 3060-0029.
FCC Forms 302-TV, 302-DTV and 349 remain unchanged.
OMB Control Number: 3060-0407.
Title: Application for Extension of Time to Construct a Digital
Television Broadcast Station, FCC Form 337; Section 73.3598, Period of
Construction.
Form Number: FCC Form 337.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 160.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement;
Recordkeeping requirement.
Estimated Time Per Response: 0.25 to 3 hours.
Total Annual Burden: 263 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $37,000.
Nature of Response: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007, the Commission adopted a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking in the matter of the Third Periodic Review of
the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07-91, FCC 07-70, to consider the procedures
and rule changes necessary to complete the nation's transition to DTV,
including how best to ensure that broadcasters complete construction of
their facilities on their final, post-transition (digital) channel by
the statutory deadline.
The NPRM proposes that stations requesting an extension of time to
construct DTV facilities with construction deadlines occurring prior to
February 17, 2009, the station must use the Form 337 in accordance with
47 CFR 73.624(d)(3). The NPRM proposes to revise Form 337 to
accommodate these filings. Also, for stations with construction
deadlines occurring on February 17, 2009 and later, the station must
make a letter filing in accordance with 47 CFR 73.3598.
In addition, the Commission is consolidating information collection
OMB Control Number 3060-1001 (Application for Extension of Time to
Construct a Digital Television Broadcast Station, FCC Form 337) into
this collection OMB Control Number 3060-0407 (Section 73.3598, Period
of Construction).
OMB Control Number: 3060-0386.
Title: Section 73.1635, Special Temporary Authorizations (STAs).
Form Number: Not applicable.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 2,350.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 to 4 hours.
Total Annual Burden: 2,800 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $1,403,150.
Nature of Response: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007, the Commission adopted a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of the Third Periodic Review of
the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07-91, FCC 07-70, to consider the procedures
and rule changes necessary to complete the nation's transition to DTV,
including how best to ensure that broadcasters complete construction of
their facilities on their final, post-transition (digital) channel by
the statutory deadline.
For purposes of the DTV transition, the NPRM proposes that stations
may file requests for Special Temporary Authorities (STAs) to use
analog translators to offset the loss of analog service when seeking to
reduce or terminate analog service prior to the transition deadline
(i.e., February 17, 2009); to temporarily remain on their in-core pre-
transition DTV channel after the DTV transition deadline (i.e.,
February 17, 2009), and to build less than full, authorized post-
transition facilities by the transition deadline (i.e., February 17,
2009).
OMB Control Number: 3060-0216.
Title: Informal Requests to Discontinue Only One Service and
Informal Requests to Flash Cut; Section 73.3538, Application To Make
Changes in an Existing Station, Section 73.1690(e) Modification of
Transmission Systems.
Form Number: Not Applicable.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 700.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement;
Recordkeeping requirement.
Estimated Time Per Response: 0.50--3 hours.
Total Annual Burden: 1,125 hours
Total Annual Costs: None.
Nature of Response: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007, the Commission adopted a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of the Third Periodic Review of
the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07-91, FCC 07-70, to consider the procedures
and rule changes necessary to complete the nation's transition to DTV,
including how best to ensure that broadcasters complete construction of
their facilities on their final, post-transition (digital) channel by
the statutory deadline.
The NPRM proposes to allow stations to request Commission approval
to discontinue analog TV service prior to the end of the DTV
transition. To obtain such approval from the Commission, the NPRM
proposes to allow stations to make such requests by sending a letter to
the Video Division of the Media Bureau and sending an e-mail to
analog@fcc.gov in lieu of filing an application for construction permit
(e.g., Form 301 or Form 340).
The NPRM also considers whether to allow stations to request
Commission approval to return their currently assigned, pre-transition-
only DTV channel (i.e., a DTV channel that is not their final, post-
transition channel) and flash cut at or before the transition deadline
from their current analog channel to their final, post-transition
channel.
Section 73.1690(e) of the Commission's rules requires AM, FM and TV
station licensees to prepare an informal statement or diagram
describing any electrical and mechanical modification to authorized
transmitting equipment that can be made without prior Commission
approval provided that equipment performance measurements are made to
ensure compliance with FCC rules. This informal statement or diagram
must be retained at the transmitter site as long as the equipment is in
use. This requirement is approved in OMB Control Number 3060-0374, but
is being consolidated into this collection (3060-0216).
Section 73.3538 requires broadcast stations to file an informal
application to modify or discontinue the obstruction marking or
lighting of an antenna supporting structure. The NPRM does
[[Page 37313]]
not affect this requirement. It has already been approved by OMB.
OMB Control Number: 3060-XXXX.
Title: Digital TV Transition Status Report.
Form Number: FCC Form 387.
Type of Review: New Collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 1,812.
Frequency of Response: One-time reporting requirement.
Estimated Time per Response: 2 hours.
Total Annual Burden: 3,624 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $1,268,400.
Nature of Response: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007, the Commission adopted a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of the Third Periodic Review of
the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07-91, FCC 07-70. This is a review of the
transition of the nation's broadcast television system from analog to
digital television. This NPRM, among other things, proposes to require
all full-power television stations to file a form (FCC Form 387) with
the Commission detailing their transition status on or before December
1, 2007.
OMB Control Number: 3060-XXXX.
Title: Section 73.682(d), TV Transmission Standards.
Form Number: Not applicable.
Type of Review: New Collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 1,812.
Frequency of Response: Weekly reporting requirement; Third party
disclosure requirement.
Estimated Time Per Response: 0.50 hours.
Total Annual Burden: 47,112 hours.
Total Annual Costs: None.
Nature of Response: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Confidentiality: No need for confidentiality required.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On April 25, 2007, the Commission adopted a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of the Third Periodic Review of
the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital
Television, MB Docket No. 07-91, FCC 07-70. The NPRM proposes to update
Section 73.682(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 73.682(d), to
reflect revisions to the Advanced Television Systems Committee Inc's
(ATSC) Program System Information Protocol (PSIP) standard. The revised
ATSC PSIP standard requires broadcasters to populate the Event
Information Tables (``EITs'') with accurate information about each
event and to update the EIT if more accurate information becomes
available. In other words, it requires broadcasters to provide detailed
programming information when transmitting their broadcast signal.
Currently, under version A/65-B, many broadcasters provide only general
information in the EIT tables.
Summary of the NPRM of Proposed Rulemaking
I. Introduction
1. Congress has mandated that after February 17, 2009, full-power
broadcast stations must transmit only in digital signals, and may no
longer transmit analog signals. With this Notice of Proposed Rule
Making (``NPRM''), we begin our third periodic review of the transition
of the nation's broadcast television system from analog to digital
television (``DTV''). The Commission has conducted two prior periodic
reviews: the first in MM Docket No. 00-39 and the second in MB Docket
No. 03-15. We conduct these periodic reviews in order to assess the
progress of the transition and make any necessary adjustments to the
Commission's rules and policies to facilitate the introduction of DTV
service and the recovery of spectrum at the end of the transition.
Here, we consider how to ensure that broadcasters complete construction
of their final, post-transition (digital) facilities by the statutory
deadline.
II. Executive Summary
2. In this Third DTV Periodic Review, we (1) provide a progress
report on the transition; (2) describe the status and readiness of
existing stations to complete the transition; (3) analyze and propose
the procedures and rule changes necessary to complete the transition;
and (4) address other issues related to the transition. Stations that
have not completed construction of their post-transition channels must
focus their full attention on the construction efforts necessary to
move from analog to digital transmission no later than the February 17,
2009 deadline established by Congress. Specifically, we propose the
following actions to facilitate the transition for full-power
television stations (We note that the statutory transition deadline
applies only to full-power stations; see 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14) and
337(e). We will address the digital transition for low power television
(``LPTV'') stations in a separate proceeding. The Commission previously
determined that it has discretion under 47 U.S.C. 336(f)(4) to set the
date by which analog operations of stations in the low power and
translator service must cease. Accordingly, the Commission decided not
to establish a fixed termination date for the low power digital
television transition until it resolved the issues concerning the
transition of full-power television stations):
We tentatively conclude that February 17, 2009 will be the
construction deadline for stations that are building digital facilities
based on their new channel allotments in the new DTV Table of
Allotments (``DTV Table'') and accompanying Appendix B (``new DTV Table
Appendix B''), which will be established by an order in the
Commission's DTV proceeding, MB Docket No. 87-268 (i.e., stations whose
DTV channel for pre-transition operation is not their channel for post-
transition use). The Commission proposed channel assignments and
reference facilities for stations' post-transition operations in a 2006
Notice of Proposed Rule Making in MB Docket No. 87-268. See Advanced
Television Systems and Their Impact upon the Existing Television
Broadcast Service, MB Docket No. 87-268, Seventh Further Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, 71 FR 66592-01 (Nov. 15, 2006) (``Seventh
FNPRM''). The Seventh FNPRM sets forth a channel for each eligible
broadcast TV station in the proposed new DTV Table. The details of each
station's channel assignment, including technical facilities and
predicted service and interference information, are set forth in the
proposed new DTV Table. [Section V.C.1. and proposed rule 47 CFR
73.624(d)(1)(v)]
We propose that stations whose post-transition channel is
the same as their pre-transition DTV channel, who are not facing unique
technical challenges, and who are granted either an extension in the
Construction Deadline Extension Order or a waiver in the Use-or-Lose
Order must complete construction of their DTV facilities by the
deadline established in those orders (i.e., six months from the release
date of the orders). These stations have had their post-transition
channel assignments for several years. [Section V.C.2.]
We propose that February 17, 2009 will be the construction
deadline for stations facing unique technical
[[Page 37314]]
challenges, such as those with side-mounted digital antennas or similar
situations in which the operation of their analog service prevents the
completion of their full, authorized digital facilities. [Section
V.C.3.]
We tentatively conclude that stations that have not
completed construction of full, authorized facilities on their pre-
transition channel may be excused from completion of construction if
this is not their post-transition channel. Our proposal applies to
stations that have pending construction permits (``CPs''), that have
requested CP extensions, that have been granted CP extensions, that
have been granted waivers of the use-or-lose deadlines, and that have
waivers for their checklist facility deadline. These stations will be
permitted to carry-over protection to their full, authorized
facilities. [Section V.C.1.]
We propose to restrict the situations in which grants of
an extension of time to construct digital facilities will be considered
for construction deadlines prior to the end of the transition. In
addition, beginning February 17, 2009, we propose to apply the existing
``tolling'' standard applied to analog stations to requests for
additional time to construct digital facilities and will toll the
construction deadline only in limited and unavoidable circumstances.
[Section V.C.4. and proposed rule 47 CFR 73.624(d)(3)]
We propose to require all full-power television stations
to file a form with the Commission detailing their current transition
status, additional steps necessary in order to be prepared for digital-
only operation on February 17, 2009, and a timeline for making those
steps. [Section V., paragraph 35]
We consider whether and, if so, under what circumstances
we should accept new requests by stations to return their pre-
transition-only DTV channel (i.e., a DTV channel that is not their
final, post-transition channel) before the end of the transition and
``flash cut'' from their analog channel to their post-transition
channel. [Section V.B.]
We examine the circumstances in which a station may be
allowed to reduce or terminate its analog service to facilitate
construction of its final, DTV facility on its post-transition channel.
[Section V.A.]
We propose to allow stations to operate on newly allotted
post-transition facilities before the transition deadline provided they
would not interfere with existing, pre-transition service. [Section
V.C.5.]
We request comment on additional proposals to provide
stations with regulatory flexibility to facilitate stations'
construction of their post-transition facilities by the statutory
deadline. [Section V.C.6.]
We propose to offer expedited processing to a station
applying for a CP to build its post-transition channel, provided that
its application (i) does not seek to expand the station's noise-limited
service contour in any direction beyond that established by the new DTV
Table Appendix B; (ii) specifies facilities that match or closely
approximate those new DTV Table Appendix B facilities (i.e., if the
station is unable to build precisely the facilities specified in the
new DTV Table Appendix B, then it must apply for facilities that
deviate no more than five percent from those new DTV Table Appendix B
facilities with respect to predicted population); and (iii) is filed
within 45 days of the effective date of Section 73.616 of the rules
adopted in the Report and Order in this proceeding. We propose to
revise FCC Forms 301 and 340 accordingly. [Section V.D.]
We tentatively conclude that we will not accept
applications to expand post-transition facilities until we have
completed processing the applications to build authorized facilities,
but we seek comment on ways to consider expansion applications sooner
without delaying the transition. [Section V.E.]
We tentatively conclude to adopt a new 0.5 percent
interference standard to apply to maximizations and to new channel
allotments after the transition. [Section V.F. and proposed rule 47 CFR
73.616]
We propose to update the Commission's rules to reflect any
revisions to the ATSC standards concerning DTV transmission and PSIP
since the adoption of the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order.
[Sections V.G.1. and V.G.2. and proposed rule 47 CFR 73.882(d)]
We seek comment on whether the Commission can and should
revise Section 73.624(g) to require DTV stations that are permittees
operating pursuant to a DTV STA or other FCC authorization for DTV
transmission to file FCC Form 317 and pay fees on any revenue derived
from feeable ancillary or supplementary services in the same way
required of DTV licensees. [Section V.G.3.]
We invite comment on whether further amendments are needed
to the station identification rules and, in particular, whether the
current rules provide for appropriate identification of multicast
channels. [Section V.G.4.]
We invite comment on whether coordination is needed
between broadcasters and MVPDs to ensure a smooth transition, whether
this coordination is underway, and what actions the Commission should
take to assist broadcasters with their coordination efforts. [Section
V.G.6.]
III. Background
3. Congress specifically requires the Commission to evaluate the
progress of the nation's transition to digital television. The first
DTV periodic review began in March 2000 and the second in January 2003.
In addition to these periodic reviews, the Commission has continued to
conduct its DTV proceeding, through which it has developed new channel
allotments and assignments. The Commission established the initial DTV
Table of Allotments in 1997. See Advanced Television Systems and Their
Impact Upon the Existing Television Broadcast Service, MM Docket No.
87-268, Sixth Report and Order, 62 FR 26684-01 (May 14, 1997) (``Sixth
Report and Order''). The details of each station's channel assignment
under the initial DTV Table, including technical facilities and
predicted service and interference information, were set forth in the
initial Appendix B of the Sixth Report and Order. The initial Appendix
B was amended in 1998. Simultaneous with the adoption of the Sixth
Report and Order, the Commission announced DTV channel assignments for
eligible licensees in the Fifth Report and Order, 62 FR 26966-02 (May
16, 1997), in the same docket. The Commission recently issued a Seventh
FNPRM in connection with the DTV proceeding.
4. The Second Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and
Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, MB Docket No.
03-15, Report and Order, 69 FR 59500 (October 4, 2004) (``Second DTV
Periodic Report and Order'') established a three-round channel-election
process through which eligible broadcast licensees and permittees
(collectively, ``licensees'') selected their post-transition channels
inside the core TV spectrum (i.e., channels 2-51). The Commission
received 11 petitions for reconsideration of the Second DTV Periodic
Report and Order, raising a number of issues, most of which have been
rendered moot by the completion of the channel election process . At
the start of this process, licensees proposed their post-transition
facilities. (In November 2004, licensees filed certifications via FCC
Form 381 in order to define their proposed post-transition facilities.
In these certifications, licensees chose whether to (1) replicate their
allotted facilities, (2) maximize to their currently authorized
facilities, or (3) reduce to a
[[Page 37315]]
currently authorized smaller facility. Stations that did not submit
certification forms by the deadline were evaluated based on replication
facilities.) After each channel election round, the Commission
announced proposed post-transition channels--called tentative channel
designations (``TCDs'').
5. The channel election process culminated in the adoption of the
Seventh FNPRM, which proposed a new DTV Table. (Comments on the
proposed new DTV Table were due January 25th and replies were due
February 26th.) The proposed new DTV Table provides eligible stations
with channels for post-transition operations inside the core TV
spectrum. The DTV Table is based on the TCDs announced for stations, as
well as the Commission's efforts to promote overall spectrum efficiency
and ensure that broadcasters provide the best possible service to the
public, including service to local communities. The proposed DTV Table
will ultimately replace the current DTV Table. (The Seventh FNPRM
proposes to codify the new DTV Table in 47 CFR 73.622(i). The current
DTV Table, which is contained in 47 CFR 73.622(b), will become obsolete
at the end of all authorized interim DTV operations. The current NTSC
Table, which is contained in 47 CFR 73.606(b), will become obsolete at
the end of the transition, when all full-power analog operations must
cease.)
6. In early 2006, Congress enacted significant statutory changes to
the DTV transition in the Digital Television and Public Safety Act of
2005 (``DTV Act''). (The DTV Act is Title III of the Deficit Reduction
Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-171, 120 Stat. 4 (2006) (``DRA''), and is
codified at 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14) and 337(e).) Most importantly, it set
February 17, 2009, as the date certain for the end of the DTV
transition, at which time all full-power television broadcast stations
must cease their analog transmissions. (The DTV Act amends 47 U.S.C.
309(j)(14)(A) to establish February 17, 2009 as a new hard deadline for
the end of analog transmissions by full-power stations and directs the
Commission to ``take such actions as are necessary (1) to terminate all
licenses for full-power television stations in the analog television
service, and to require the cessation of broadcasting by full-power
stations in the analog television service, by February 18, 2009; and
(2) to require by February 18, 2009, * * * all broadcasting by full-
power stations in the digital television service, occur only on
channels between channels 2 and 36, inclusive, or 38 and 51, inclusive
(between frequencies 54 and 698 megahertz, inclusive).'') The DTV Act
does not provide for waivers or extensions of this deadline for
cessation of analog broadcasts. (Previously, 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14)
provided an exception to the earlier December 31, 2006 transition
deadline if the Commission determined that less than 85 percent of the
television households in a licensee's market were capable of receiving
the signals of DTV broadcast stations through various means (i.e., via
over-the-air reception, cable or satellite, or digital-to-analog
conversion technology). Congress eliminated the statutory provisions
authorizing market-specific extensions of the DTV transition, including
the 85 percent benchmark for DTV reception. This new hard deadline
obviates the need for any further discussion of how to interpret and
implement the former Section 309(j)(14)(B) of the Act, an issue
previously deferred by the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order.) The
DTV Act also requires broadcast licensees to cease operations outside
the core spectrum after February 17, 2009 in order to make that
spectrum available for public safety and commercial wireless uses.
Full-power TV broadcast stations must be operating inside the core TV
spectrum and only in digital upon the end of the transition on February
17, 2009. (The DTV Act also created a coupon program to subsidize the
purchase of digital-to-analog (``D-to-A'') converter boxes.)
IV. Progress Report
7. The transition to DTV is a complex undertaking, affecting
virtually every segment of the television industry and every American
who watches television. The Commission has been facilitating the
migration to DTV by adopting a standard for digital broadcasting,
creating an initial DTV Table, awarding DTV licenses, establishing
operating rules for the new service, monitoring the physical build-out
of DTV broadcast stations, and helping to educate consumers about the
transition. At the end of the transition, television broadcast
operations will be limited to the core TV spectrum, enabling the
recovery of a total of 108 MHz of spectrum (i.e., TV channels 52-69).
(The core TV spectrum is comprised of low-VHF channels 2 to 4 (54-72
MHz) and 5 to 6 (76-88 MHz), VHF channels 7 to 13 (174-216 MHz) and UHF
channels 14-51 (470-698 MHz), but does not include TV channel 37 (608-
614 MHz), which is used for radio astronomy research.) Twenty-four
megahertz of spectrum currently used for TV broadcast channels 63, 64,
68, and 69 have been reallocated for critically important public safety
needs. The remaining 84 MHz (currently TV broadcast channels 52-62 and
65-67) have been or will be auctioned for new wireless services.
(Channels 60-69 (746-806 MHz) were reallocated for public safety and
wireless communications services in 1998. Channels 52-59 were
reallocated for new wireless services in 2001.)
A. Status of DTV Operations
8. In 1997, the Commission granted eligible licensees a paired
channel for digital operations during the transition and set dates for
construction and operation of broadcasters' facilities on their
allotted DTV channels. Pursuant to the construction schedule set forth
in Section 73.624(d) of the Commission's rules, affiliates of the top
four networks in the top ten television markets were required to
complete construction of their DTV facilities by May 1, 1999; top four
network affiliates in markets 11-30 by November 1, 1999; all remaining
commercial television stations by May 1, 2002; and all noncommercial
educational (``NCE'') television stations by May 1, 2003.
9. As of April 2, 2007, 1,702 television stations in all markets
(representing approximately 98.8 percent of all stations) have been
granted a DTV construction permit (``CP'') or license. A total of 1,603
stations are now broadcasting a digital signal. Of these, 1,215
stations are authorized with licensed facilities or program test
authority and 388 stations are operating pursuant to special temporary
authority (``STA'') or experimental DTV authority.
10. In the top 30 television markets, all 119 top-four network-
affiliated television stations are on the air in digital, 110 with
licensed DTV facilities or program test authority and nine with STAs.
In markets 1-10, all 40 top-four network affiliated stations are
providing digital service, 38 with licensed DTV facilities and two with
STAs. In markets 11-30, all top-four 79 network affiliated stations are
providing DTV service, 74 with licensed DTV facilities and five with
STAs.
11. Approximately 1,230 commercial television stations were due to
commence digital broadcasts by May 1, 2002. As of April 2, 2007, 1,136
of these stations (92.4 percent) are broadcasting a digital signal. In
addition, approximately 373 NCE television stations were required to
commence digital operations by May 1, 2003. As of April 2, 2007, 348
(93.3 percent) of these stations are broadcasting a digital signal.
(The commercial and NCE TV stations that have not commenced digital
broadcasts were required to file a request for extension of additional
[[Page 37316]]
time to complete construction of their DTV facilities by the deadline
established for them in 47 CFR 73.624(d)(1).)
B. Status of Consumer Capability to Receive DTV Signals
12. In connection with the 2006 Competition Report, the Commission
requested information about the number of households relying solely on
over-the-air broadcast television for programming. (The Commission also
sought information about the number of cable and satellite households
that rely on over-the-air service on one or more of their television
sets not connected to a multichannel video programming distributor
(``MVPD'').) In comments filed to that proceeding, the National
Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') indicated that there are
approximately 69 million television sets are not connected to any MVPD
service. Specifically, NAB reported that nearly 19.6 million households
rely solely on over-the-air broadcast television, and there are
approximately 45.5 million sets in those homes. NAB states that ``in
these 19.6 million over-the-air households, there are approximately 1.3
million over-the-air digital sets.'' Thus, according to NAB, ``[t]here
are roughly 18.7 million over-the-air households with only analog sets,
and these households have about 44.2 million analog sets.'' NAB reports
that an additional 23.5 million television sets in 14.7 million MVPD
households remain unconnected to the MVPD service. NAB states that this
2006 data showing large numbers of over-the-air television sets is
consistent with two surveys conducted in 2005.
13. The demand for DTV sets has grown with increased availability
of DTV programming and receiving equipment and a steady drop in the
price of such equipment. The Consumer Electronics Association (``CEA'')
reports that the consumer electronics industry has invested $66.7
billion in DTV products since 1998. Moreover, CEA reports more than $75
billion in consumer investment in DTV products. According to CEA, 23.9
million DTV sets and monitors were sold in 2006. CEA predicts that 29.2
million DTV products will be sold in 2007, 33.4 million in 2008, 35.2
million in 2009 and 36.4 million in 2010. CEA estimates that DTV sales
will represent 69 percent of all TV sales in 2006. (CEA projects that
DTV sales will represent 92 percent of all TV sales in 2007.)
14. In order to promote the availability of reception equipment and
protect consumers by ensuring that their television sets continue to
work in the digital world just as they do today, the Commission
established a DTV tuner mandate, which requires, as of March 1, 2007,
that all television receiver equipment (e.g., TV sets (all sizes),
VCRs, digital video recorders, and any other TV receiving devices)
manufactured or shipped in interstate commerce or imported into the
United States, for sale or resale to the public, must be capable of
receiving the signals of DTV broadcast stations over-the-air. (In 2002,
the Commission initiated the DTV tuner mandate, with a phase-in period
based on screen size to minimize the cost impact on consumers. In 2005,
the Commission accelerated the implementation of the DTV tuner mandate
to become effective on March 1, 2007 and expanded the mandate to
include television sets less than 13 inches.)
15. In addition, subsidized digital-to-analog (``D-to-A'')
converter boxes will be available to eligible consumers starting
January 2008, further promoting access to digital reception equipment.
(See Rules to Implement and Administer a Coupon Program for Digital-to-
Analog Converter Boxes, NTIA Docket No. 0612242667-7051-01, Final Rule,
72 FR 12097 at paragraph 8 (``NTIA Coupon Program Final Rule''); 47 CFR
301. Starting January 1, 2008, all U.S. households will be eligible to
request up to two $40 coupons to be used toward the purchase of up to
two, D-to-A converter boxes, while the initial $990 million allocated
for the program is available; 47 CFR 301.3-4. If the initial funds are
used up and the additional funds (up to $510 million) are authorized,
eligibility for the coupons will be limited to over-the-air-only
television households. Eligible consumers will have until March 31,
2009 to make a request for these coupons.) This subsidy program, which
was created by the DTV Act, will allow consumers with analog-only TV
sets to receive over-the-air broadcast programming after the February
17, 2009 transition date, when analog broadcasting ends. Without a D-
to-A converter box, consumers will not be able to view full-power TV
broadcasts after the transition date unless they purchase DTV sets
(television sets with a built-in digital tuner) or subscribe to a pay
television service. Congress directed the National Telecommunications
and Information Administration (``NTIA'') of the U.S. Department of
Commerce to administer this subsidy program. (The DTV Act directs the
Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information to ``implement
and administer a program through which households in the United States
may obtain coupons that can be applied toward the purchase of digital-
to-analog converter boxes.'' The purpose of the program is to enable
consumers to continue receiving broadcast programming over the air
using analog-only televisions not connected to cable or satellite
service.) In March 2007, NTIA issued final rules to implement the
program, which subsidizes the purchase of D-to-A converter boxes.
C. Status of Broadcasters' Transition
16. Stations are responsible for meeting the statutory deadline for
the DTV transition. The Commission has no discretion to waive or change
this transition date. Full-power broadcast stations not ready to
commence digital operations upon expiration of the deadline for the
transition on February 17, 2009 must go dark and risk losing their
authorizations to operate after the transition date. (A station failing
to meet its construction deadline may be subject to license revocation
procedures (47 U.S.C. 312), the issuance of forfeitures (47 U.S.C.
503), or other remedial measures, such as admonishment. For example, we
remind licensees that ``if a broadcasting station fails to transmit
broadcast signals for any consecutive 12-month period, then the station
license granted for the operation of that broadcast station expires at
the end of that period, notwithstanding any provision, term, or
condition of the license to the contrary;'' 47 U.S.C. 312(g). If
discontinuing operations, stations must also be mindful of the
Commission's rules.)
17. We have proposed post-transition channel assignments for all
eligible stations. (These post-transition channel assignments largely
were based on the choices made by licensees during the channel-election
process. Eligibility for a proposed post-transition channel assignment
was limited to existing Commission licensees and permittees.) In the
proposed new DTV Table, 1,812 stations received proposed post-
transition DTV channels. (This total includes 1,806 stations announced
in Appendix A to the Seventh FNPRM and six additional stations
announced in a subsequent Public Notice. Additional new permittees may
also be announced before the transition deadline.) Of these, 1,178
stations received the DTV channel on which they are currently
authorized, 517 stations received the NTSC channel on which they are
currently authorized, and 117 stations received a different channel
from which they are currently authorized.
[[Page 37317]]
18. The process of transitioning the entire TV broadcast industry
to digital-only operation on each station's final channels will be
complex. Accordingly, stations already should be planning their
transition to digital-only service on their post-transition channel.
Some stations may now be ready, or very close to ready, to make their
transition. We have provided a list of 752 stations that we believe
fall into this category and seek input from those stations regarding
our assessment.
19. Most stations, however, will need to take significant steps to
accomplish their transition. Stations' situations will vary based on
their final channel assignments in the new DTV Table and whether, and
if so to what extent, they must change their transmission facilities to
operate on their post-transition channels. As described below, stations
may seek to change their antenna or tower locations. (A station that
must change its DTV tower location may face a considerable challenge,
especially if the station must construct a new tower. Such a station
must consider whether there are any existing towers that can be used or
if a new tower must be constructed. Because of the lead times involved
in purchasing or leasing land with appropriate FAA clearances, local
and state zoning requirements, and varying timelines for designing the
new tower, ordering equipment, delivery of equipment, and construction-
related issues, such a station must begin planning as soon as possible
in order to transition by the deadline. In some cases, building a new
tower at this stage in the process may no longer be a viable option.)
Stations may also need to change their effective radiated power (ERP),
antenna height above average terrain (HAAT) or antenna pattern as set
forth in the new DTV Table Appendix B, as adopted.
20. Before discussing the issues that must be addressed to complete
the transition, we first categorize the circumstances that stations are
in to describe what stations in each group must accomplish. First,
there are stations that will remain on their current DTV in-core
channel. Second, there are stations that will return to their analog
in-core channel. Third, there are stations that will move to a
completely new in-core channel. In addition to these three general
categories, stations without a paired channel (i.e., ``singleton
stations'') that will ``flash cut'' from broadcasting on their analog
channel to broadcasting on a digital channel raise unique issues that
we will consider separately. (``Singletons'' or ``single-channel
licensees'' refers to those licensees that do not have a second or
``paired'' channel to convert to DTV. ``Flash-cut'' refers to the
situation where a station gives up its pre-transition digital channel
and transitions to digital service using its analog channel or a newly
allotted channel.) We seek comment on these categories and
circumstances in general and on the particular tentative conclusions,
proposals and queries in the Issue Analysis (section V), below.
1. Category One: Stations Remaining on Their Current DTV In-Core
Channel
21. There are 1,178 stations remaining on their current DTV in-core
channel for post-transition operations, based on the proposed new DTV
Table. Most of these stations will have a relatively simple transition
because they already have the authorizations necessary to operate at
their proposed post-transition facilities as specified in the proposed
new DTV Table Appendix B. In fact, many of these stations have already
constructed and received licenses for their post-transition facilities,
and so will simply turn off their analog service to complete their
transition.
22. Some stations in this category, however, may not have completed
their authorized construction. This would include a station that has
not built anything and has a CP or extension of its ``checklist''
deadline and a station that has constructed a reduced facility and is
operating pursuant to Special Temporary Authority (``STA''). In
addition to turning off their analog service, these stations may need
to make changes to match their post-transition facilities as specified
in the new DTV Table Appendix B. The difficulty faced by these stations
will depend on the type of change and degree of change required to
complete their authorized construction. (For example, stations in this
category may need to adjust their transmitter power, their antenna
design, their antenna location, or some combination thereof. We expect
that relatively minor adjustments to operating power can be done
easily, perhaps through the use of in-house engineers. Changes
involving more significant power changes and/or changes to transmitting
antennas may require more time and effort. For example, a number of
stations currently have a top-mounted analog antenna and a side-mounted
digital antenna, and to provide full digital service will need to re-
mount the digital antenna to the top of the tower. Also, if an entirely
new transmission line and/or antenna must be installed, additional time
will be needed to order the transmission line and antenna and have it
delivered to the site.)
23. Furthermore, some of these stations may have pending
applications with unresolved international coordination issues.
Licensees in this category with pending applications should consult
with the Commission staff about the timing for action on their
applications. In addition, they should coordinate with Commission staff
regarding necessary modifications to their applications that will
result in international approval. They may need to proceed with
constructing authorized facilities to the extent approved by Canada or
Mexico if the issues delaying action on their applications cannot be
resolved in time to allow construction to be completed before the end
of the transition. (These stations may be required to adjust their
transmitter power, their antenna location, their antenna design, or
some combination thereof.)
2. Category Two: Stations Returning to Their Analog In-Core Channel
24. There are 517 stations that will return to their current analog
in-core channel for post-transition operations, based on the proposed
new DTV Table. (This group of stations includes some analog singletons
and flash-cutters.) Stations in category two may face each of the
category one challenges involving tower construction, antenna
replacement or relocation, and transmitter replacement or power
adjustments.
25. In addition, these stations may need to determine whether they
can use any of their analog or digital transmission equipment (e.g.,
transmitter, transmission line or waveguide, and antenna). If a station
finds it has a transmitter that it could use, it will also need to
determine whether that transmitter can provide the appropriate power
level. It is our understanding that a station that is going to stay
within a spectrum band (low-VHF, high-VHF or UHF) and change its
frequency within 5 or 6 channels (36 MHz or less) will most likely
require fewer technical changes than if the change of broadcast
frequency is more than 6 channels. We expect that channel moves of
fewer than 5 or 6 channels may require only minor modifications to the
station's digital transmitter, whereas more significant changes may
require major modifications or an entirely new transmitter. We seek
comment on these assumptions.
26. Stations that will return to their current analog channel also
may need to determine whether their current analog
[[Page 37318]]
or DTV antenna can be used. Generally, the design, condition and
channel of operation of their current antennas, as well as the
stations' directional antenna characteristics established in the new
DTV Table Appendix B, as adopted, must be considered when these
stations evaluate the suitability of their antennas for post-transition
DTV operation. The ability of these stations to use an existing digital
antenna may depend upon how significant the change in channel numbers
will be for these stations as they move from their current DTV channel
back to their current analog in-core channel. It is our understanding
that channel moves of more than 5 or 6 channels will likely require a
new antenna and transmission line or new waveguide. We seek comment on
these assumptions.
27. These stations also must consider the impact on their analog TV
service, which might be disrupted entirely or limited in reach to a
smaller area during periods of work on the tower. For example, a
temporary reduction in coverage might be due to reduced power analog TV
operation at a backup site in order to facilitate construction on the
main tower facility.
3. Category Three: Stations Moving to a Completely New In-Core Channel
28. There are 117 stations that will move to a completely new in-
core channel for post-transition operations, based on the proposed new
DTV Table. These stations face similar challenges to those returning to
their analog (in-core) channel. In addition, these stations will need
to coordinate with other stations to complete their move. For example,
another station may occupy the relocating station's post-transition
channel or it may occupy an adjacent channel (located in the same or a
nearby area) to the relocating station's post-transition channel. Also,
these stations may find that their tower site cannot support three
antennas at once, as may be necessary to accommodate their current
analog and DTV operations while preparing for broadcasting on their
post-transition channel.
4. Singleton Stations
29. There are 137 stations that do not have a paired channel (i.e.,
stations that do not have both an analog and a digital channel), based
on the proposed new DTV Table. These stations are commonly referred to
as ``singletons.'' These stations fit in one of the preceding three
categories, but they may encounter different challenges and
circumstances that deserve special consideration in this review.
Specifically, for this discussion, ``singletons'' include (1) those
stations described in footnote 101 of the Second DTV Periodic Report
and Order as licensees that did not receive a second or ``paired''
channel to use during the transition to DTV; (2) those stations that
had a paired DTV channel and that we authorized to discontinue
providing analog TV service; (3) those paired-channel stations that
gave up their interim DTV channel pursuant to ``flash cut'' approval;
and (4) those paired-channel stations that we propose to allow to
``flash cut.'' Singletons include DTV and analog TV stations, and can
be unbuilt, operating at reduced facilities, or fully constructed and
licensed. Analog TV singletons will be flash cutting from broadcasting
on their analog channel to broadcasting on a digital channel. Flash-
cutting often will involve singletons ending their analog TV operation
and beginning their DTV operation on their current analog channel, but
in some cases will require that a station change to a new channel for
post-transition operation. Singleton stations, like those with paired
channels, are responsible to ensure that they have completed the
construction of their digital facilities by the February 17, 2009
deadline, except for stations whose initial CPs expire later. (Single-
channel stations receive a CP with a three-year construction period.
Thus, new stations whose CPs were granted after February 2006 will have
construction deadlines later than February 17, 2009.) After February
17, 2009, stations that have not constructed analog facilities may only
construct digital facilities on their post-transition channel.
30. Singleton licensees and permittees should have a post-
transition channel in the proposed new DTV Table and proposed
facilities specified in the proposed new DTV Table Appendix B, provided
such permittee status is announced by Public Notice before the order
establishing the new DTV Table is adopted. DTV singletons remaining on
their current DTV channel for post-transition operations face the same
challenges identified in category one above. These stations must
complete authorized construction consistent with the new DTV Table
Appendix B, as adopted. Stations that have done so and are operating
and licensed need not take any further steps at this time. DTV
singletons that have not completed construction must do so as discu