Office of International Regimes and Agreements; Proposed Subsequent Arrangement, 36999-37000 [E7-13111]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 129 / Friday, July 6, 2007 / Notices Each participating State will receive an additional incentive payment of not less than $15,000 annually from the contractor to support evaluation activities in the State. Incentive payments may also be provided to participating districts to offset the costs of their participation in the evaluation of the Multi-Year IEP Program. Total available funds will depend on the number of awards made. 5. States must describe how districts were selected and provide an assurance that districts are voluntarily participating along with a description of the circumstances under which district participation may be terminated. States participating in this program and the Paperwork Waiver Demonstration Program may not select the same LEAs to participate in both programs. 6. Proposals must be for projects not to exceed a period of four years. Note: The term ‘‘parent’’ as used in these requirements and selection criteria for the Multi-Year IEP Program has the same meaning given the term in section 300.30 of the final regulations implementing part B of the Act. Selection Criteria The following selection criteria will be used to evaluate State proposals submitted under this program. These particular criteria were selected because they address the statutory requirements and program requirements and permit applicants to propose a distinctive approach to addressing these requirements. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Note: We will inform applicants of the points or weights assigned to each criterion and sub-criterion in a notice published in the Federal Register inviting States to submit applications for this program. 1. Significance. The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed project. In determining the significance of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: (a) The extent to which the proposed project involves the development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on, or are alternatives to, existing strategies. (b) The potential contribution of the proposed project to increased knowledge or understanding of educational problems, issues, or effective strategies. (c) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely to be attained by the project, especially improvements in teaching and student outcomes. 2. Quality of the project design. The Secretary considers the quality of the VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:16 Jul 05, 2007 Jkt 211001 design of the proposed project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: (a) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable. (b) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target population or other identified needs. (c) The quality of the proposed project design and procedures for documenting project activities and results. 3. Quality of the management plan. The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project. In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: (a) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous improvement in the operation of the proposed project. (b) How the applicant will ensure that a diversity of perspectives are brought to bear in the operation of the proposed project, including those of parents, teachers, the business community, a variety of disciplinary and professional fields, recipients or beneficiaries of services, or others, as appropriate. Executive Order 12866 This notice of final additional requirements and selection criteria has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have assessed the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action. The potential costs associated with this regulatory action are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and efficiently. Although there may be costs associated with participating in this pilot, the Department will provide incentive payments to States to help offset these costs. In addition, we expect that States will weigh these costs against the benefits of being able to participate in the pilot and will only opt to participate in this pilot if the potential benefits exceed the costs. We have also determined that this regulatory action does not unduly interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of their governmental functions. Intergovernmental Review This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36999 Electronic Access to This Document You may view this document, as well as all other Department of Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/ news/fedregister. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1– 888–293–6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512–1530. Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ index.html. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.326Q Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Multi-Year Individualized Education Program Demonstration Program) Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414. Dated: June 29, 2007. Jennifer Sheehy, Director of Policy and Planning for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. [FR Doc. E7–13146 Filed 7–5–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of International Regimes and Agreements; Proposed Subsequent Arrangement Department of Energy. Notice of proposed subsequent arrangement. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The Department is providing notice of a proposed ‘‘subsequent arrangement’’ under the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the United States and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the United States and Canada. This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 147,929 kg of Natural UF6 (67.6% U), containing 100,000 kg of Uranium. This material will be retransferred from Cameco Corporation, Canada, to Urenco Deutschland GmbH, Germany for final use in a civilian nuclear power reactor E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM 06JYN1 37000 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 129 / Friday, July 6, 2007 / Notices program by Exelon Generation, Illinois, USA. The material originally was exported to Canada pursuant to NRC Export License Number XSOU–8798. Urenco GmbH is authorized to receive nuclear material pursuant to the U.S.Euratom Agreement for Cooperation. In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, we have determined that this subsequent arrangement will not be inimical to the common defense and security. This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen days after the date of publication of this notice. inimical to the common defense and security. This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen days after the date of publication of this notice. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Dated: June 28, 2007. For the Department of Energy. Anatoli Welihozkiy, Acting Director, Office of International Regimes and Agreements. [FR Doc. E7–13112 Filed 7–5–07; 8:45 am] ACTION: BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Dated: June 28, 2007. For the Department of Energy. Anatoli Welihozkiy, Acting Director, Office of International Regimes and Agreements. [FR Doc. E7–13111 Filed 7–5–07; 8:45 am] [6450–01–P] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P ACTION: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of International Regimes and Agreements; Proposed Subsequent Arrangement Department of Energy. Notice of proposed subsequent arrangement. AGENCY: mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES ACTION: SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The Department is providing notice of a proposed ‘‘subsequent arrangement’’ under the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the United States and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the United States and Canada. This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 59,191.6 kg of Natural UF6 (67.6% U), containing 40,000 kg of Uranium. This material will be retransferred from Cameco Corporation, Canada, to Urenco Ltd., Netherlands for final use in a civilian nuclear power reactor program by Constellation Energy Group, Maryland, USA. The material originally was exported to Canada pursuant to NRC Export License Number XSOU–8798. Urenco Ltd. is authorized to receive nuclear material pursuant to the U.S.Euratom Agreement for Cooperation. In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, we have determined that this subsequent arrangement will not be VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:16 Jul 05, 2007 Jkt 211001 Office of Science; Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee; Renewal Department of Energy. Notice of renewal. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and in accordance with section 102–3.65, title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee has been renewed for a twoyear period beginning July 2007. The Committee will provide advice to the Director, Office of Science, on the Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program managed by the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research. The renewal of the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee has been determined to be essential to the conduct of the Department of Energy business and to be in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Department of Energy by law. The Committee will operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of Energy Organization Act (Pub. L. 95–91), and rules and regulations issued in implementation of those Acts. Further information regarding this Advisory Committee may be obtained from Ms. Rachel Samuel at (202) 586– 3279. Issued in Washington, DC, on July 1, 2007. James N. Solit, Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. E7–13140 Filed 7–5–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Office of Science; DOE/Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee Department of Energy. Notice of open meeting. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC). Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal Register. DATES: Tuesday, August 14, 2007, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Wednesday, August 15, 2007, 9 a.m. to 11:45 a.m. ADDRESSES: American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2000 Florida Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20009–1277. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melea Baker, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research; SC–21/ Germantown Building; U.S. Department of Energy; 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, DC 20585–1290; Telephone (301) 903–7486, (E-mail: Melea.Baker@science.doe.gov). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is to provide advice and guidance on the advanced scientific computing research program. Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 Opening Remarks from the Committee Chair Federal Advisory Committee Act Basics View from Washington and Germantown ESnet Workshops Report Discussions on Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) Committee of Visitors (COV) Report Discussion on Charge— Networking Report Discussion on Charge—Joint Panel with the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee (BERAC) on Genomes to Life (GTL) Role of High Productivity Computing (HPC) in BER New Charge—Joint Panel with BERAC on Climate Modeling Presentation on Town Hall Meetings What’s Going on in European and Asian Supercomputing Update on Incite Public Comment Wednesday, August 15, 2007 Update on High Productivity Computing System (HPCS) E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM 06JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 129 (Friday, July 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36999-37000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13111]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


 Office of International Regimes and Agreements; Proposed 
Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of Section 131 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The 
Department is providing notice of a proposed ``subsequent arrangement'' 
under the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear 
Energy between the United States and the European Atomic Energy 
Community (Euratom) and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy between the United States and Canada.
    This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 147,929 kg 
of Natural UF6 (67.6% U), containing 100,000 kg of Uranium. This 
material will be retransferred from Cameco Corporation, Canada, to 
Urenco Deutschland GmbH, Germany for final use in a civilian nuclear 
power reactor

[[Page 37000]]

program by Exelon Generation, Illinois, USA. The material originally 
was exported to Canada pursuant to NRC Export License Number XSOU-8798. 
Urenco GmbH is authorized to receive nuclear material pursuant to the 
U.S.-Euratom Agreement for Cooperation.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, we have determined that this subsequent arrangement will not 
be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.

    Dated: June 28, 2007.

    For the Department of Energy.
Anatoli Welihozkiy,
Acting Director, Office of International Regimes and Agreements.
[FR Doc. E7-13111 Filed 7-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.