National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan National Priorities List, 36607-36610 [E7-13056]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 4, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See Section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Waste treatment
and disposal, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 25, 2007.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
part 62, chapter I, of title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
I
PART 62—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:50 Jul 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
36607
Substance Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP). This direct final partial deletion
I 2. Subpart KK is amended by adding
is being published by EPA with the
an undesignated center heading and
concurrence of the State of Colorado,
§ 62.8880 to read as follows:
through the Colorado Department of
Public Health and the Environment
*
*
*
*
*
because EPA has determined that all
Emissions From Hospital, Medical, and appropriate response actions, under
Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI)
CERCLA, for the approximate 7 acres
have been completed and, therefore,
§ 62.8880 Identification of plan.
further remedial action pursuant to
(a) Identification of plan. Ohio rules
CERCLA is not appropriate.
to Control Emissions from Hospital,
DATES: This direct final deletion will be
Medical, and Infectious Waste
effective September 4, 2007. If adverse
Incinerators (HMIWI), submitted by the
comments are received by August 6,
Ohio EPA on October 18, 2005. Rules
2007, EPA will publish a timely
3745–75–01, 3745–75–02, 3745–75–03,
3745–75–04, 3745–75–05, and 3745–75– withdrawal of the direct final deletion
in the Federal Register informing the
06 of the Ohio Administrative Code,
public that the deletion will not take
effective in the state March 23, 2004,
effect.
with the exception of rules 3745–75–
02(I)(1), 3745–75–02(I)(2), 3745–75–
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed
02(I)(4), and 3745–75–02(I)(7).
to: Rebecca Thomas, Project Manager,
(b) Identification of sources. The plan 8EPR–SR, thomas.rebecca@epa.gov,
applies to existing hospital/medical/
U.S. EPA, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop,
infectious waste incinerators for which
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303)
construction, reconstruction, or
312–6552 or 1–800–227–8917,
modification was commenced on or
extension 6552.
before June 20, 1996, as described in 40
INFORMATION REPOSITORIES:
CFR part 60, subpart Ce.
Comprehensive information about the
(c) Effective date. The effective date of Site is available for viewing and copying
the plan is August 6, 2007.
at the Site information repository
located at U.S. EPA Region 8 Records
[FR Doc. E7–13002 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am]
Center, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver,
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6473,
hours of operation M–F 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
or at the Colorado Department of Public
AGENCY
Health and the Environment, Records
Center, Building B, Second Floor, 4300
40 CFR Part 300
Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1986–0005; FRL–8335–9] 80246–1530, hours of operation M–F 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
National Oil and Hazardous Substance FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pollution Contingency Plan National
Rebecca Thomas, Project Manager,
Priorities List
8EPR–SR, thomas.rebecca@epa.gov,
U.S. EPA, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop,
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303)
Agency.
312–6552 or toll free 1–800–227–8917,
ACTION: Direct final notice of partial
extension 6552.
deletion of the Uravan Superfund Site
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
from the National Priorities List.
Subpart KK—Ohio
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 8 is publishing a
direct final notice of partial deletion of
approximately 7 acres within the
Uravan Superfund Site (Site), located in
Montrose County, Colorado, from the
National Priorities List (NPL). The
acerage comprises a one mile section of
Colorado State Highway 141 between
mile posts 75 and 76.
The NPL, promulgated pursuant to
section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which
is the National Oil and Hazardous
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 8 is publishing this direct
final notice of partial deletion of
approximately 7 acres within the
Uravan Superfund Site from the
National Priorities List.
The EPA identifies sites that appear to
present a significant risk to public
health or the environment and
maintains the NPL as the list of those
sites. As described in § 300.425(e)(3) of
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
36608
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL
remain eligible for remedial actions if
conditions at a deleted site warrant such
action.
Because EPA considers this action to
be non-controversial and routine, EPA is
taking it without prior publication of a
notice of intent to delete. This action
will be effective September 4, 2007,
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by August 6, 2007, on this document. If
adverse comments are received within
the 30 day public comment period on
this document, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal of this direct final
partial deletion before the effective date
of the deletion and the deletion will not
take effect. EPA will, as appropriate,
prepare a response to comments and
continue with the deletion process on
the basis of the notice of intent to delete
and the comments already received.
There will be no additional opportunity
to comment.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that EPA is using for this action. Section
IV discusses the Uravan Superfund Site
and demonstrates how a portion of the
site meets the deletion criteria. Section
V discusses EPA’s action to delete the
Site from the NPL unless adverse
comments are received during the
public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP
provides that releases may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response
is appropriate. In making a
determination to delete a Site from the
NPL, EPA shall consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
(Hazardous Substance Superfund
Response Trust Fund) response under
CERCLA has been implemented, and no
further response action by responsible
parties is appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Even if a site is deleted from the NPL,
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at the deleted
site above levels that allow for
unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure, CERCLA section 121(c), 42
U.S.C. 9621(c) requires that a
subsequent review of the site be
conducted at least every five years after
the initiation of the remedial action at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:50 Jul 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
the deleted site to ensure that the action
remains protective of public health and
the environment. If new information
becomes available which indicates a
need for further action, EPA may initiate
remedial actions. Whenever there is a
significant release from a site deleted
from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application
of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of the Site:
1. The EPA consulted with Colorado
on the deletion of the Site from the NPL
prior to developing this direct final
notice of partial deletion.
2. Colorado concurred with deletion
of the Site from the NPL.
3. Concurrently with the publication
of this direct final notice of partial
deletion, a notice of the availability of
the parallel notice of intent to partially
delete published today in the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of the Federal Register is
being published in a major local
newspaper of general circulation at or
near the Site and is being distributed to
appropriate federal, state, and local
government officials and other
interested parties; the newspaper notice
announces the 30-day public comment
period concerning the notice of intent to
delete the Site from the NPL.
4. The EPA placed copies of
documents supporting the deletion in
the Site information repository
identified above.
5. If adverse comments are received
within the 30-day public comment
period on this document, EPA will
publish a timely notice of withdrawal of
this direct final notice of partial deletion
before its effective date and will prepare
a response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of
the notice of intent to partially delete
and the comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does
not itself create, alter, or revoke any
individual’s right or obligations.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not
in any way alter EPA’s right to take
enforcement actions, as appropriate.
The NPL is designed primarily for
informational purposes and to assist
EPA management. Section 300.425(e)(3)
of the NCP states that the deletion of a
site from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions,
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following information provides
EPA’s rationale for partially deleting the
Site from the NPL.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Site Location
The Uravan site is located in western
Colorado in the western portion of
Montrose County on Highway 141
approximately 13 miles northwest of the
Town of Nucla. The town of Uravan was
demolished during remedial activities at
the Site. The Site is located adjacent to
the San Miguel River which drains into
the Dolores River and hence to the
Colorado River.
This partial deletion pertains to
approximately 7 acres, a one mile
section of Colorado State Highway 141,
comprised of a right-of-way up to 60 feet
in width between mile posts 75 and 76.
Site History
Colorado State Highway 141 traverses
the Uravan Superfund site in western
Colorado. The Uravan site is included
on the National Priorities List (NPL) and
is undergoing remedial work pursuant
to the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA). The Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT)
has completed cleanup activities along
the portion of Highway 141 impacted by
radioactive mill tailings generated from
the Manhattan Project in the 1940’s.
A curve in State Highway 141
between mile posts 75 and 76 was
identified as having significant safety
issues related to its design. Highway 141
in this area was thought to be underlain
by radioactive materials. Gamma data
and 26 soil borings along the roadway
confirmed that the roadway was
underlain by radioactive materials.
Construction activities associated
with the road realignment exposed
approximately 1 mile of road bed
containing radioactive materials and
these waste materials were removed and
relocated to a secure on-site repository
on Club Mesa for long-term isolation.
Institutional controls or future site
inspections of the highway are not
warranted because of the successful
removal of contaminated materials.
Site Investigation
Post-remedial action conditions at the
Highway 141 site were evaluated using
penetrating radiation surveys and
laboratory analyses conducted on
surface and subsurface soil samples
collected in 2006. All of the pertinent
details concerning site activities were
taken from the September 2006 Final
Construction and Soil Confirmation
Investigation Report prepared by
Umetco Minerals Corporation (Umetco).
Twelve representative soil sample
locations were randomly selected using
the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE)
Visual Sampling Plan Version 2.2
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
software. Investigative procedures
followed site-specific guidance
documents regarding data collection.
CDPHE conducted walking surveys of
the highway right-of-way after
excavation was complete. In addition,
CDPHE obtained splits of selected
samples and conducted soil sample
analyses in their laboratory. Both of
these activities confirmed that the
measurements and analytical results
obtained during Umetco’s investigation
were reasonable, repeatable and valid.
Cleanup criteria for soils in the
Uravan area were established in
Umetco’s report titled Soil Cleanup
Program Methodology for Uravan,
Colorado dated June 1999. The report
sets forth two criteria for unrestricted
use of the property. Category 1 criteria
are based on attaining soil cleanup
levels that are within background ranges
and Category 2 criteria represent soil
cleanup levels that are health-risk
based. Both Category 1 and 2 cleanup
levels are protective of human health
and allow for unrestricted use of the
property.
Remedy Decision
Evaluation of radioactive materials
and contaminated soils along Highway
141 was initiated in 1996 with the
development of a remedial investigation
plan for the highway right-of-way and
surrounding environs that Umetco
reported in a March 1996 Remedial
Investigation Plan for Surface and
Subsurface Soils and Structures
Northeast of Highway 141. This
investigation plan described field
techniques and methods to be used
during site characterization activities
and set forth data quality objectives for
conducting on-site gamma
measurements and obtaining analytical
data from the laboratory testing of
surface and subsurface soil samples.
The April 2000 Characterization Report
and Remedial Action Plan prepared by
Umetco shows that contaminated
materials were likely present beneath
the roadway between mileposts 75 and
76 but that the remaining part of the
roadway from milepost 76 and 78 did
not contain uranium mill tailing
materials. This conclusion was in
conformance with known, historical
processing activities that only occurred
in the area between mileposts 75 and 76
(the Manhattan Project).
CDOT characterized the area utilizing
26 soil borings along the highway
shoulders to obtain subsurface
geological, environmental and
geotechnical information. Boring depths
ranged from 4 to 20 feet and all were
logged with a gamma scintillometer.
The borings were advanced until native
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:50 Jul 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
soils were encountered, generally 10 to
20 feet, or until refusal. Umetco
supplied trained radiological
technicians and equipment to assist in
logging the borings, and to maintain
control of contaminated materials.
Direct surface and subsurface field
measurements included the use of
scintillation penetrating radiation
measurements. Gamma radiation
measurements were performed at the
soil surface and subsurface at
approximately 1 foot intervals along the
vertical bore path. Gamma radiation
measurements were collected in-situ to
appraise penetrating radiation exposure
rates and to estimate soil radionuclide
concentrations.
Characterization of Risk
A characterization investigation was
conducted in accordance with
established procedures that indicated
radioactive materials were present in
the area from mileposts 75 and 76 but
that such materials were not present in
the remaining Highway 141 right-ofway.
Following site cleanup, the average
contaminant concentrations of
radionuclides and heavy metals in soil
in the CDOT Highway 141 project area
have been reduced to levels below
appropriate soil cleanup objectives.
Remedial actions were successful in
restoring the land to concentrations at or
below background ranges and, thus,
assuring that there is no incremental
human risk from any of the eleven
constituents of concern.
Response Actions
CDOT’s contractor began the removal
of contaminated materials in the
southwest area of Highway 141 on
January 16, 2006. The contractor
removed contaminated debris and
excavated contaminated soils from
specified areas within the highway
right-of-way. Radiologically elevated
soils were removed to depths
determined by real time scintillometer
surveys. Approximately 51,000 cubic
yards of contaminated materials were
removed from the CDOT right-of-way
and an additional 2,800 cubic yards
were removed from Umetco’s property
adjacent to the right-of-way.
All material excavated from the
roadway was dry and groundwater was
not encountered while conducting the
remedial activities. In addition, there
was a sharp boundary between the
tailings material and the underlying
native, clayey soils. Contaminated
materials did not migrate into the soils
or into groundwater in the subject area.
The area was backfilled and regraded.
On numerous occasions, CDPHE
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36609
verified that cleanup activities were
being conducted properly.
Contaminated materials were
removed from the access to county road
EE–22 and the bypass was backfilled.
All disturbed areas were graded to blend
with the surrounding topography and
provide, as far as practicable, the
original drainage features. The area was
revegetated in May 2006.
Cleanup Standards
Remedial activities were conducted in
accordance with the Uravan Consent
Decree and Remedial Action Plan that
sets forth cleanup goals for the removal
and disposal of radioactive materials.
These cleanup goals were established
using applicable, relevant and
appropriate standards described in the
Consent Decree. The Final Construction
and Soil Confirmation Report describes
the remedial actions performed along
the roadway and assesses the
effectiveness of the soil cleanup
activities.
Operation and Maintenance
The remedial actions attained the goal
of unrestricted use of the property.
Future institutional controls or future
site inspections are not warranted in the
Highway 141 project area because all
soil cleanup criteria for unrestricted use
of the land have been attained at the
site.
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have
been satisfied as required in CERCLA
section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and
CERCLA section 117, 42 U.S.C. 9617.
Documents in the deletion docket which
EPA relied on for recommendation of
the deletion from the NPL are available
to the public in the information
repository.
V. Deletion Action
The EPA, with concurrence of the
State of Colorado, has determined that
all appropriate responses, for the
approximate 7 acres within the Uravan
Superfund Site, under CERCLA have
been completed, and that no further
response actions, under CERCLA, are
necessary. Therefore EPA is partially
deleting the Site from the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is
taking it without prior publication. This
action will be effective September 4,
2007, unless EPA receives adverse
comments by August 6, 2007. If adverse
comments are received within the 30day public comment period, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of deletion before the
effective date of the deletion and it will
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
36610
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
not take effect and, EPA will prepare a
response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of
the notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received. There will
be no additional opportunity to
comment.
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: June 26, 2007.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
I
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
waste, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
For the reasons set out in this
document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended
as follows:
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300
is amended by revising the entry under
Colorado for ‘‘Uravan Uranium Project
(Union Carbide)’’ to read as follows:
PART 300—[AMENDED]
Appendix B to Part 300—National
Priorities List
I
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
I
TABLE 1.—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION
Notes
(a)
State
Site name
City/county
*
CO ................
*
*
*
Uravan Uranium Project (Union Carbide) ..........................
*
*
*
(former town of) Uravan .....................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
P*
*
(a) * * *
*P = sites with partial deletion(s).
[FR Doc. E7–13056 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
42 CFR Part 100
RIN 0905–AA68
National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program: Calculation of Average Cost
of a Health Insurance Policy
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Subtitle 2 of Title XXI of the
Public Health Service Act, as enacted by
the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
Act of 1986, as amended (the Act),
governs the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (VICP). The
VICP, administered by the Secretary of
Health and Human Services (the
Secretary), provides that a proceeding
for compensation for a vaccine-related
injury or death shall be initiated by
service upon the Secretary, and the
filing of a petition with the United
States Court of Federal Claims (the
Court). In some cases, the injured
individual may receive compensation
for future lost earnings, less appropriate
taxes and the ‘‘average cost of a health
insurance policy, as determined by the
Secretary.’’ The final rule establishes the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
new method of calculating the average
cost of a health insurance policy and
determines the amount of the average
cost of a health insurance policy to be
deducted from the compensation award.
DATES: This regulation is effective
August 6, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tamara Overby, Chief, Policy Analysis
Branch, Division of Vaccine Injury
Compensation, Healthcare Systems
Bureau, Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), Room 11C–26,
Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, Maryland 20857; e-mail:
toverby@hrsa.gov; telephone number:
(301) 443–6593.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 9,
2006, the Secretary published in the
Federal Register (71 FR 33420), a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to
revise regulations for the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
(VICP) to establish a new method of
calculating the average cost of a health
insurance policy. The public comment
period on the NPRM closed on August
8, 2006.
The Secretary received one written
comment. The one commenter stated
that the proposed rule raises both
Federalism and Constitutional issues.
The Secretary has considered this
comment and notes that section
2115(a)(3)(B) of the Public Health
Service Act gives explicit authority to
the Secretary to determine the average
cost of a health insurance policy.
Based on the new methodology, the
amount of a health insurance policy to
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
be deducted from a compensation award
for the 12-month period, October 1,
2006—September 30, 2007 is $363.12
per month. In August 2006, Medical
Expenditure Panel Survey-Insurance
Component (MEPS–IC), available at
https://www.meps.ahrq.gov, published
the annual 2004 average total single
premium per enrolled employee at
private-sector establishments that
provide health insurance. The figure
published was $3,705. This figure is
divided by 12 months to determine the
cost per month of $308.75 which is the
proposed new baseline figure for 2004.
The baseline of $308.75 shall be
increased or decreased by the
percentage change reported by the most
recent ‘‘Employer Health Benefits’’
Annual Survey, Kaiser Family
Foundation and Health Research and
Educational Trust (KFF/HRET) survey at
https://www.kff.org. The percentage
increase from 2004–2005 was 9.2
percent. By adding this percentage
increase, the calculated average monthly
cost of a health insurance policy in 2005
is $337.16. The KFF/HRET reported
increase from 2005–2006 was 7.7
percent. By adding this percentage
increase to the calculated $337.16 for
2005, the calculated average cost of a
health insurance policy in 2006 is
$363.12 per month.
Because the KFF/HRET survey is
published annually, the Department
will periodically (generally on an
annual basis) recalculate the average
cost of a health insurance policy by
obtaining a new baseline from the latest
MEPS–IC data and updating this
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 128 (Thursday, July 5, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36607-36610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13056]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1986-0005; FRL-8335-9]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan
National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final notice of partial deletion of the Uravan Superfund
Site from the National Priorities List.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 8 is
publishing a direct final notice of partial deletion of approximately 7
acres within the Uravan Superfund Site (Site), located in Montrose
County, Colorado, from the National Priorities List (NPL). The acerage
comprises a one mile section of Colorado State Highway 141 between mile
posts 75 and 76.
The NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of
1980, as amended, is appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which is the
National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP).
This direct final partial deletion is being published by EPA with the
concurrence of the State of Colorado, through the Colorado Department
of Public Health and the Environment because EPA has determined that
all appropriate response actions, under CERCLA, for the approximate 7
acres have been completed and, therefore, further remedial action
pursuant to CERCLA is not appropriate.
DATES: This direct final deletion will be effective September 4, 2007.
If adverse comments are received by August 6, 2007, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal of the direct final deletion in the Federal Register
informing the public that the deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Rebecca Thomas, Project Manager,
8EPR-SR, thomas.rebecca@epa.gov, U.S. EPA, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6552 or 1-800-227-8917,
extension 6552.
Information Repositories: Comprehensive information about the Site is
available for viewing and copying at the Site information repository
located at U.S. EPA Region 8 Records Center, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver,
Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6473, hours of operation M-F 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., or at the Colorado Department of Public Health and the
Environment, Records Center, Building B, Second Floor, 4300 Cherry
Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530, hours of operation M-F 8 a.m.
to 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Thomas, Project Manager, 8EPR-
SR, thomas.rebecca@epa.gov, U.S. EPA, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver,
Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6552 or toll free 1-800-227-8917,
extension 6552.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 8 is publishing this direct final notice of partial
deletion of approximately 7 acres within the Uravan Superfund Site from
the National Priorities List.
The EPA identifies sites that appear to present a significant risk
to public health or the environment and maintains the NPL as the list
of those sites. As described in Sec. 300.425(e)(3) of
[[Page 36608]]
the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL remain eligible for remedial
actions if conditions at a deleted site warrant such action.
Because EPA considers this action to be non-controversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication of a notice of
intent to delete. This action will be effective September 4, 2007,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 6, 2007, on this
document. If adverse comments are received within the 30 day public
comment period on this document, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal
of this direct final partial deletion before the effective date of the
deletion and the deletion will not take effect. EPA will, as
appropriate, prepare a response to comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received. There will be no additional opportunity to
comment.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the Uravan Superfund Site and
demonstrates how a portion of the site meets the deletion criteria.
Section V discusses EPA's action to delete the Site from the NPL unless
adverse comments are received during the public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP provides that releases may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making a
determination to delete a Site from the NPL, EPA shall consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed (Hazardous Substance Superfund
Response Trust Fund) response under CERCLA has been implemented, and no
further response action by responsible parties is appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Even if a site is deleted from the NPL, where hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants remain at the deleted site above levels
that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, CERCLA section
121(c), 42 U.S.C. 9621(c) requires that a subsequent review of the site
be conducted at least every five years after the initiation of the
remedial action at the deleted site to ensure that the action remains
protective of public health and the environment. If new information
becomes available which indicates a need for further action, EPA may
initiate remedial actions. Whenever there is a significant release from
a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be restored to the
NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of the Site:
1. The EPA consulted with Colorado on the deletion of the Site from
the NPL prior to developing this direct final notice of partial
deletion.
2. Colorado concurred with deletion of the Site from the NPL.
3. Concurrently with the publication of this direct final notice of
partial deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel notice
of intent to partially delete published today in the ``Proposed Rules''
section of the Federal Register is being published in a major local
newspaper of general circulation at or near the Site and is being
distributed to appropriate federal, state, and local government
officials and other interested parties; the newspaper notice announces
the 30-day public comment period concerning the notice of intent to
delete the Site from the NPL.
4. The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the deletion in
the Site information repository identified above.
5. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this document, EPA will publish a timely notice of
withdrawal of this direct final notice of partial deletion before its
effective date and will prepare a response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of the notice of intent to
partially delete and the comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual's right or obligations. Deletion of a site from
the NPL does not in any way alter EPA's right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is designed primarily for
informational purposes and to assist EPA management. Section
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion of a site from the
NPL does not preclude eligibility for future response actions, should
future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for partially
deleting the Site from the NPL.
Site Location
The Uravan site is located in western Colorado in the western
portion of Montrose County on Highway 141 approximately 13 miles
northwest of the Town of Nucla. The town of Uravan was demolished
during remedial activities at the Site. The Site is located adjacent to
the San Miguel River which drains into the Dolores River and hence to
the Colorado River.
This partial deletion pertains to approximately 7 acres, a one mile
section of Colorado State Highway 141, comprised of a right-of-way up
to 60 feet in width between mile posts 75 and 76.
Site History
Colorado State Highway 141 traverses the Uravan Superfund site in
western Colorado. The Uravan site is included on the National
Priorities List (NPL) and is undergoing remedial work pursuant to the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA). The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has
completed cleanup activities along the portion of Highway 141 impacted
by radioactive mill tailings generated from the Manhattan Project in
the 1940's.
A curve in State Highway 141 between mile posts 75 and 76 was
identified as having significant safety issues related to its design.
Highway 141 in this area was thought to be underlain by radioactive
materials. Gamma data and 26 soil borings along the roadway confirmed
that the roadway was underlain by radioactive materials.
Construction activities associated with the road realignment
exposed approximately 1 mile of road bed containing radioactive
materials and these waste materials were removed and relocated to a
secure on-site repository on Club Mesa for long-term isolation.
Institutional controls or future site inspections of the highway are
not warranted because of the successful removal of contaminated
materials.
Site Investigation
Post-remedial action conditions at the Highway 141 site were
evaluated using penetrating radiation surveys and laboratory analyses
conducted on surface and subsurface soil samples collected in 2006. All
of the pertinent details concerning site activities were taken from the
September 2006 Final Construction and Soil Confirmation Investigation
Report prepared by Umetco Minerals Corporation (Umetco). Twelve
representative soil sample locations were randomly selected using the
U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Visual Sampling Plan Version 2.2
[[Page 36609]]
software. Investigative procedures followed site-specific guidance
documents regarding data collection.
CDPHE conducted walking surveys of the highway right-of-way after
excavation was complete. In addition, CDPHE obtained splits of selected
samples and conducted soil sample analyses in their laboratory. Both of
these activities confirmed that the measurements and analytical results
obtained during Umetco's investigation were reasonable, repeatable and
valid.
Cleanup criteria for soils in the Uravan area were established in
Umetco's report titled Soil Cleanup Program Methodology for Uravan,
Colorado dated June 1999. The report sets forth two criteria for
unrestricted use of the property. Category 1 criteria are based on
attaining soil cleanup levels that are within background ranges and
Category 2 criteria represent soil cleanup levels that are health-risk
based. Both Category 1 and 2 cleanup levels are protective of human
health and allow for unrestricted use of the property.
Remedy Decision
Evaluation of radioactive materials and contaminated soils along
Highway 141 was initiated in 1996 with the development of a remedial
investigation plan for the highway right-of-way and surrounding
environs that Umetco reported in a March 1996 Remedial Investigation
Plan for Surface and Subsurface Soils and Structures Northeast of
Highway 141. This investigation plan described field techniques and
methods to be used during site characterization activities and set
forth data quality objectives for conducting on-site gamma measurements
and obtaining analytical data from the laboratory testing of surface
and subsurface soil samples. The April 2000 Characterization Report and
Remedial Action Plan prepared by Umetco shows that contaminated
materials were likely present beneath the roadway between mileposts 75
and 76 but that the remaining part of the roadway from milepost 76 and
78 did not contain uranium mill tailing materials. This conclusion was
in conformance with known, historical processing activities that only
occurred in the area between mileposts 75 and 76 (the Manhattan
Project).
CDOT characterized the area utilizing 26 soil borings along the
highway shoulders to obtain subsurface geological, environmental and
geotechnical information. Boring depths ranged from 4 to 20 feet and
all were logged with a gamma scintillometer. The borings were advanced
until native soils were encountered, generally 10 to 20 feet, or until
refusal. Umetco supplied trained radiological technicians and equipment
to assist in logging the borings, and to maintain control of
contaminated materials.
Direct surface and subsurface field measurements included the use
of scintillation penetrating radiation measurements. Gamma radiation
measurements were performed at the soil surface and subsurface at
approximately 1 foot intervals along the vertical bore path. Gamma
radiation measurements were collected in-situ to appraise penetrating
radiation exposure rates and to estimate soil radionuclide
concentrations.
Characterization of Risk
A characterization investigation was conducted in accordance with
established procedures that indicated radioactive materials were
present in the area from mileposts 75 and 76 but that such materials
were not present in the remaining Highway 141 right-of-way.
Following site cleanup, the average contaminant concentrations of
radionuclides and heavy metals in soil in the CDOT Highway 141 project
area have been reduced to levels below appropriate soil cleanup
objectives. Remedial actions were successful in restoring the land to
concentrations at or below background ranges and, thus, assuring that
there is no incremental human risk from any of the eleven constituents
of concern.
Response Actions
CDOT's contractor began the removal of contaminated materials in
the southwest area of Highway 141 on January 16, 2006. The contractor
removed contaminated debris and excavated contaminated soils from
specified areas within the highway right-of-way. Radiologically
elevated soils were removed to depths determined by real time
scintillometer surveys. Approximately 51,000 cubic yards of
contaminated materials were removed from the CDOT right-of-way and an
additional 2,800 cubic yards were removed from Umetco's property
adjacent to the right-of-way.
All material excavated from the roadway was dry and groundwater was
not encountered while conducting the remedial activities. In addition,
there was a sharp boundary between the tailings material and the
underlying native, clayey soils. Contaminated materials did not migrate
into the soils or into groundwater in the subject area.
The area was backfilled and regraded. On numerous occasions, CDPHE
verified that cleanup activities were being conducted properly.
Contaminated materials were removed from the access to county road
EE-22 and the bypass was backfilled. All disturbed areas were graded to
blend with the surrounding topography and provide, as far as
practicable, the original drainage features. The area was revegetated
in May 2006.
Cleanup Standards
Remedial activities were conducted in accordance with the Uravan
Consent Decree and Remedial Action Plan that sets forth cleanup goals
for the removal and disposal of radioactive materials. These cleanup
goals were established using applicable, relevant and appropriate
standards described in the Consent Decree. The Final Construction and
Soil Confirmation Report describes the remedial actions performed along
the roadway and assesses the effectiveness of the soil cleanup
activities.
Operation and Maintenance
The remedial actions attained the goal of unrestricted use of the
property. Future institutional controls or future site inspections are
not warranted in the Highway 141 project area because all soil cleanup
criteria for unrestricted use of the land have been attained at the
site.
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have been satisfied as required in
CERCLA section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and CERCLA section 117, 42
U.S.C. 9617. Documents in the deletion docket which EPA relied on for
recommendation of the deletion from the NPL are available to the public
in the information repository.
V. Deletion Action
The EPA, with concurrence of the State of Colorado, has determined
that all appropriate responses, for the approximate 7 acres within the
Uravan Superfund Site, under CERCLA have been completed, and that no
further response actions, under CERCLA, are necessary. Therefore EPA is
partially deleting the Site from the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication. This action will
be effective September 4, 2007, unless EPA receives adverse comments by
August 6, 2007. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of deletion before the effective date of the
deletion and it will
[[Page 36610]]
not take effect and, EPA will prepare a response to comments and
continue with the deletion process on the basis of the notice of intent
to delete and the comments already received. There will be no
additional opportunity to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: June 26, 2007.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
0
For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 is amended by revising the entry
under Colorado for ``Uravan Uranium Project (Union Carbide)'' to read
as follows:
Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List
Table 1.--General Superfund Section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Site name City/county Notes (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
CO................. Uravan Uranium (former town of) P\*\
Project (Union Uravan.
Carbide).
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) * * *
*P = sites with partial deletion(s).
[FR Doc. E7-13056 Filed 7-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P