Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request, 36750-36751 [E7-13016]
Download as PDF
36750
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
proposed exemption is that these
operations will be required to ensure
that they employ safe drivers and that
safe equipment is used on the roads.
NAAA states that section 383.3(f)(3)
requires restricted-CDL holders to have
a ‘‘good driving record.’’ These
operators are required to perform
random drug tests on employees and to
ensure that drivers have hazardous
materials endorsements, which require a
background check by the Transportation
Security Administration. Furthermore,
under 49 CFR part 180 Subpart E,
‘‘Qualification and Maintenance of
Cargo Tanks,’’ regulations are in place to
ensure the structural integrity of the
cargo tanks used to transport fuel in the
event that the tanks are involved in a
crash.
A recent NAAA survey found that
95.3% of aerial application businesses
surveyed had never been involved in
any type of accident while transporting
fuel or chemicals. The results also show
that 92.9% of those surveyed travel on
roads in rural areas with minimal traffic
and that a vehicle transporting fuel or
chemicals travels an average of 57.81
miles per day. NAAA notes that several
operators also mentioned that they do
not travel this many miles every day. In
many cases, driving is done only once
or twice a week to a satellite facility.
To ensure that the current safety level
is preserved, NAAA states that it is in
a strong position to provide meaningful
continuing education on highway safety
to a large portion of the small business
owners of agricultural aviation
operations throughout the country
through its education program known as
the Professional Aerial Application
Support System (PAASS). The focus of
the PAASS program is to educate
individuals in the aerial application
industry on the latest techniques and
technologies to mitigate agricultural
aviation flying accidents and off-target
application incidents, in addition to
enhancing the security of aerial
application operations. According to
NAAA, in addition to educating its
industry on security and pilot safety,
PAASS can also be used to further
educate its members on highway
transportation safety issues.
A copy of the NAAA exemption
application is available for review in the
docket for this notice.
Request for Comments
In accordance with 49 U.S.C.
31315(b)(4) and 31136(e), FMCSA
requests public comment on NAAA’s
application for exemption from the 49
CFR part 383 CDL requirements. The
Agency will consider all comments
received by close of business on August
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:43 Jul 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
6, 2007. Comments will be available for
examination in the docket at the
location listed under the ADDRESSES
section of this notice. The Agency will
file comments received after the
comment closing date in the public
docket, and will consider them to the
extent practicable. In addition to late
comments, FMCSA will also continue to
file, in the public docket, relevant
information that becomes available after
the comment closing date. Interested
persons should monitor the public
docket for new material.
Issued on: June 26, 2007.
Larry W. Minor,
Acting Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E7–13021 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Federal Railroad
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
its implementing regulations, the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
hereby announces that it is seeking
approval of the following information
collection activities. Before submitting
these information collection
requirements for clearance by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), FRA
is soliciting public comment on specific
aspects of the activities identified
below. It should be noted that this
notice supersedes and corrects the
Federal Register Notice that was
published on June 11, 2007 (see 72 FR
32159), which inadvertently listed an
erroneous title for the proposed study.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than September 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on any or all of the following proposed
activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert
Brogan, Office of Safety, Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont
Ave., NW., Mail Stop 25, Washington,
DC 20590, or Ms. Gina Christodoulou,
Office of Support Systems, RAD–43,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1120
Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35,
Washington, DC 20590. Commenters
requesting FRA to acknowledge receipt
of their respective comments must
include a self-addressed stamped
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
postcard stating, ‘‘Comments on OMB
control number 2130–New.’’
Alternatively, comments may be
transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493–
6230 or (202) 493–6170, or via e-mail to
Mr. Brogan at robert.brogan@dot.gov, or
to Ms. Christodoulou at
gina.christodoulou@dot.gov. Please refer
to the assigned OMB control number or
collection title in any correspondence
submitted. FRA will summarize
comments received in response to this
notice in a subsequent notice and
include them in its information
collection submission to OMB for
approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont
Ave., NW., Mail Stop 25, Washington,
DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6292)
or Ms. Gina Christodoulou, Office of
Support Systems, RAD–43, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont
Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35, Washington,
DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6139).
(These telephone numbers are not tollfree.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Pub. L. No. 104–13, 2, 109 Stat.
163 (1995) (codified as revised at 44
U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, require Federal agencies to
provide 60-days notice to the public for
comment on information collection
activities before seeking approval by
OMB. 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1), 1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a).
Specifically, FRA invites interested
respondents to comment on the
following summary of proposed
information collection activities
regarding (i) Whether the information
collection activities are necessary for
FRA to properly execute its functions,
including whether the activities will
have practical utility; (ii) the accuracy of
FRA’s estimates of the burden of the
information collection activities,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used to
determine the estimates; (iii) ways for
FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information being
collected; and (iv) ways for FRA to
minimize the burden of information
collection activities on the public by
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)(i)–(iv); 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1)(i)–(iv). FRA believes that
soliciting public comment will promote
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Notices
its efforts to reduce the administrative
and paperwork burdens associated with
the collection of information mandated
by Federal regulations. In summary,
FRA reasons that comments received
will advance three objectives: (i) Reduce
reporting burdens; (ii) ensure that it
organizes information collection
requirements in a ‘‘user friendly’’ format
to improve the use of such information;
and (iii) accurately assess the resources
expended to retrieve and produce
information requested. See 44 U.S.C.
3501.
Below is a brief summary of proposed
new information collection activities
that FRA will submit for clearance by
OMB as required under the PRA:
Title: Confidential Close Call
Reporting System Evaluation-Related
Interview Data Collection.
OMB Control Number: 2130–New.
Abstract: In the U.S. railroad industry,
injury rates have been declining over
the last 25 years. Indeed, the industry
incident rate fell from a high of 12.1
incidents per 100 workers per year in
1978 to 3.66 in 1996. As the number of
incidents has decreased, the mix of
causes has also changed toward a higher
proportion of incidents that can be
attributed to human and organizational
factors. This combination of trends—
decrease in overall rates but increasing
proportion of human factors-related
incidents—has left safety managers with
a need to shift tactics in reducing
injuries to even lower rates than they
are now.
In recognition of the need for new
approaches to improving safety, FRA
has instituted the Confidential Close
Call Reporting System (C3RS). The
operating assumption behind C3RS is
that by assuring confidentiality,
employees will report events which, if
dealt with, will decrease the likelihood
of accidents. C3RS, therefore, has both a
confidential reporting component, and a
problem analysis/solution component.
C3RS is expected to affect safety in two
ways. First, it will lead to problem
solving concerning specific safety
conditions. Second, it will engender an
organizational culture and climate that
supports greater awareness of safety and
a greater cooperative willingness to
improve safety.
If C3RS works as intended, it could
have an important impact on improving
safety and safety culture in the railroad
industry. While C3RS has been
developed and implemented with the
participation of FRA, railroad labor, and
railroad management, there are
legitimate questions about whether it is
being implemented in the most
beneficial way, and whether it will have
its intended effect. Further, even if C3RS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:43 Jul 03, 2007
Jkt 211001
is successful, it will be necessary to
know if it is successful enough to
implement on a wide scale. To address
these important questions, FRA is
implementing a formative evaluation to
guide program development, a
summative evaluation to assess impact,
and a sustainability evaluation to
determine how C3RS can continue after
the test period is over. The evaluation
is needed to provide FRA with guidance
as to how it can improve the program,
and how it might be scaled up
throughout the railroad industry.
Program evaluation is an inherently
data driven activity. Its basic tenet is
that as change is implemented, data can
be collected to track the course and
consequences of the change. Because of
the setting in which C3RS is being
implemented, that data must come from
the railroad employees (labor and
management) who may be affected.
Critical data include beliefs about safety
and issues related to safety, and
opinions/observations about the
operation of C3RS.
The proposed study is a five-year
demonstration project to improve rail
safety, and is designed to identify safety
issues and propose corrective action
based on voluntary reports of close calls
submitted to the Bureau of
Transportation Statistics, U.S.
Department of Transportation. Because
of the innovative nature of this program,
FRA is implementing an evaluation,
which will be carried out by the Volpe
National Transportation Systems Center
(Volpe Center), U.S. Department of
Transportation, to determine whether
the program is succeeding, how it can
be improved and, if successful, what is
needed to spread the program
throughout the railroad industry.
Confidential interviews to evaluate the
close call reporting system will be
conducted with two groups: (1) Key
stakeholders to the process (e.g., FRA
officials, industry labor, and carrier
management within participating
railroads); and (2) Employees in
participating railroads who are eligible
to submit close call reports to the
Confidential Close Call Reporting
System. Different questions will be
addressed to each of these two groups.
Confidential interviews will be semistructured, with follow-up questions
asked as appropriate depending on the
respondent’s initial answer.
Form Number(s): FRA F 6180.126A;
FRA F 6180.126B.
Affected Public: Railroad Employees
and Key Non-railroad Stakeholders.
Respondent Universe: 300 Select
Railroad Employees/Non-railroad
Stakeholders.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36751
Frequency of Submission: On
Occasion.
Estimated Annual Burden: 267 Hours.
Status: Regular Review.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5
CFR 1320.5(b), 1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA
informs all interested parties that it may
not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 28,
2007.
Belinda Ashton,
Acting Director, Office of Budget, Federal
Railroad Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–13016 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
from certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
Boone & Scenic Valley Railroad
[Docket Number FRA–2007–28097]
By letter dated April 26, 2001, the
Boone & Scenic Valley Railroad (BSV)
petitioned FRA for a waiver of
compliance from the requirements of 49
CFR 223.11, Existing locomotives, for
four diesel electric locomotives, under
Docket Number FRA–2001–9607. These
four locomotives are: Numbers 1858 and
2254 (built by General Electric), Number
1098 model S–2 (American Locomotive
Company), and Number 1003 model
NW–2 (Electromotive Division of
General Motors).
On October 2, 2001, the Railroad
Safety Board approved this requested
waiver for a period of 5 years, with an
option for renewal. On December 6,
2006, the Board extended the waiver for
an additional 5 years. However, the BSV
also operates a steam locomotive,
Number JS8419, over approximately 12
miles of their line from Boone, IA, in
conjunction with their tourist and
excursion service. Since this locomotive
was built after January 1, 1946, it is
required to be equipped with glazing
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 128 (Thursday, July 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36750-36751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-13016]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and its
implementing regulations, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
hereby announces that it is seeking approval of the following
information collection activities. Before submitting these information
collection requirements for clearance by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting public comment on specific aspects of
the activities identified below. It should be noted that this notice
supersedes and corrects the Federal Register Notice that was published
on June 11, 2007 (see 72 FR 32159), which inadvertently listed an
erroneous title for the proposed study.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than September 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on any or all of the following
proposed activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of
Safety, Planning and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC
20590, or Ms. Gina Christodoulou, Office of Support Systems, RAD-43,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35,
Washington, DC 20590. Commenters requesting FRA to acknowledge receipt
of their respective comments must include a self-addressed stamped
postcard stating, ``Comments on OMB control number 2130-New.''
Alternatively, comments may be transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493-
6230 or (202) 493-6170, or via e-mail to Mr. Brogan at
robert.brogan@dot.gov, or to Ms. Christodoulou at
gina.christodoulou@dot.gov. Please refer to the assigned OMB control
number or collection title in any correspondence submitted. FRA will
summarize comments received in response to this notice in a subsequent
notice and include them in its information collection submission to OMB
for approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Planning
and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120
Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202)
493-6292) or Ms. Gina Christodoulou, Office of Support Systems, RAD-43,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493-6139). (These telephone
numbers are not toll-free.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
Pub. L. No. 104-13, 2, 109 Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at 44
U.S.C. 3501-3520), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320,
require Federal agencies to provide 60-days notice to the public for
comment on information collection activities before seeking approval by
OMB. 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), 1320.10(e)(1),
1320.12(a). Specifically, FRA invites interested respondents to comment
on the following summary of proposed information collection activities
regarding (i) Whether the information collection activities are
necessary for FRA to properly execute its functions, including whether
the activities will have practical utility; (ii) the accuracy of FRA's
estimates of the burden of the information collection activities,
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used to
determine the estimates; (iii) ways for FRA to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information being collected; and (iv) ways
for FRA to minimize the burden of information collection activities on
the public by automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology (e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)(i)-(iv); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1)(i)-(iv). FRA believes that
soliciting public comment will promote
[[Page 36751]]
its efforts to reduce the administrative and paperwork burdens
associated with the collection of information mandated by Federal
regulations. In summary, FRA reasons that comments received will
advance three objectives: (i) Reduce reporting burdens; (ii) ensure
that it organizes information collection requirements in a ``user
friendly'' format to improve the use of such information; and (iii)
accurately assess the resources expended to retrieve and produce
information requested. See 44 U.S.C. 3501.
Below is a brief summary of proposed new information collection
activities that FRA will submit for clearance by OMB as required under
the PRA:
Title: Confidential Close Call Reporting System Evaluation-Related
Interview Data Collection.
OMB Control Number: 2130-New.
Abstract: In the U.S. railroad industry, injury rates have been
declining over the last 25 years. Indeed, the industry incident rate
fell from a high of 12.1 incidents per 100 workers per year in 1978 to
3.66 in 1996. As the number of incidents has decreased, the mix of
causes has also changed toward a higher proportion of incidents that
can be attributed to human and organizational factors. This combination
of trends--decrease in overall rates but increasing proportion of human
factors-related incidents--has left safety managers with a need to
shift tactics in reducing injuries to even lower rates than they are
now.
In recognition of the need for new approaches to improving safety,
FRA has instituted the Confidential Close Call Reporting System
(C\3\RS). The operating assumption behind C\3\RS is that by assuring
confidentiality, employees will report events which, if dealt with,
will decrease the likelihood of accidents. C\3\RS, therefore, has both
a confidential reporting component, and a problem analysis/solution
component. C\3\RS is expected to affect safety in two ways. First, it
will lead to problem solving concerning specific safety conditions.
Second, it will engender an organizational culture and climate that
supports greater awareness of safety and a greater cooperative
willingness to improve safety.
If C\3\RS works as intended, it could have an important impact on
improving safety and safety culture in the railroad industry. While
C\3\RS has been developed and implemented with the participation of
FRA, railroad labor, and railroad management, there are legitimate
questions about whether it is being implemented in the most beneficial
way, and whether it will have its intended effect. Further, even if
C\3\RS is successful, it will be necessary to know if it is successful
enough to implement on a wide scale. To address these important
questions, FRA is implementing a formative evaluation to guide program
development, a summative evaluation to assess impact, and a
sustainability evaluation to determine how C\3\RS can continue after
the test period is over. The evaluation is needed to provide FRA with
guidance as to how it can improve the program, and how it might be
scaled up throughout the railroad industry.
Program evaluation is an inherently data driven activity. Its basic
tenet is that as change is implemented, data can be collected to track
the course and consequences of the change. Because of the setting in
which C\3\RS is being implemented, that data must come from the
railroad employees (labor and management) who may be affected. Critical
data include beliefs about safety and issues related to safety, and
opinions/observations about the operation of C\3\RS.
The proposed study is a five-year demonstration project to improve
rail safety, and is designed to identify safety issues and propose
corrective action based on voluntary reports of close calls submitted
to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of
Transportation. Because of the innovative nature of this program, FRA
is implementing an evaluation, which will be carried out by the Volpe
National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center), U.S. Department
of Transportation, to determine whether the program is succeeding, how
it can be improved and, if successful, what is needed to spread the
program throughout the railroad industry. Confidential interviews to
evaluate the close call reporting system will be conducted with two
groups: (1) Key stakeholders to the process (e.g., FRA officials,
industry labor, and carrier management within participating railroads);
and (2) Employees in participating railroads who are eligible to submit
close call reports to the Confidential Close Call Reporting System.
Different questions will be addressed to each of these two groups.
Confidential interviews will be semi-structured, with follow-up
questions asked as appropriate depending on the respondent's initial
answer.
Form Number(s): FRA F 6180.126A; FRA F 6180.126B.
Affected Public: Railroad Employees and Key Non-railroad
Stakeholders.
Respondent Universe: 300 Select Railroad Employees/Non-railroad
Stakeholders.
Frequency of Submission: On Occasion.
Estimated Annual Burden: 267 Hours.
Status: Regular Review.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR 1320.5(b),
1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA informs all interested parties that it may not
conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 28, 2007.
Belinda Ashton,
Acting Director, Office of Budget, Federal Railroad Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-13016 Filed 7-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P