Notice of Disclosure of Confidential Business Information Obtained Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act to Subcontractors of EPA Contractor U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Science Applications International Corporation, Harry-Torchiana, and CACI, Inc., 36451-36452 [E7-12877]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 3, 2007 / Notices
CO 80202–1129, telephone (303) 312–
6320, or e-mail at
ajayi.christopher@epa.gov.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL—8334–8]
The Clean
Air Act (Act) affords EPA a 45–day
period to review and object to, as
appropriate, operating permits proposed
by State permitting authorities. Section
505(b)(2) of the Act authorizes any
person to petition the EPA
Administrator within 60 days after the
expiration of this review period to
object to State operating permits if EPA
has not done so. Petitions must be based
only on objections to the permit that
were raised with reasonable specificity
during the public comment period
provided by the State, unless the
Petitioner demonstrates that it was
impracticable to object during the
comment period or that the grounds for
the objection or other issues arose after
this period.
On January 18, 2006, the EPA
received a petition from Petitioners
requesting that EPA object to the
issuance of the Title V operating permit
issued by South Dakota Department of
Environmental and Natural Resources
(DENR) to GCC Dacotah Cement
Manufacturing Plant in Rapid City,
South Dakota (‘‘the Facility’’).
The Petitioners request that EPA
object to the issuance of the proposed
permit and raise the following
objections as the bases for their petition:
1. The permit fails to ensure low
sulfur coal is utilized to ensure
compliance with BACT for Sulfur
Dioxide emissions;
2. the permit fails to require the
baghouses and electrostatic precipitators
for control of Particulate Matter (PM) be
operated and maintained in any specific
way to ensure they control particulate
emissions within acceptable limits;
3. the permit is vague, lacks
enforceability and is inadequate to
ensure compliance with PM limits;
4. the permit fails to require sufficient
monitoring of BACT for Nitrogen Oxide
emissions;
5. the permit fails to require operation
and maintenance of equipment
according to manufacture’s specification
thereby failing to ensure compliance
with BACT for CO emissions;
6. the permit fails to require
continuous PM monitoring or in the
alternative fails to require sufficient
periodic monitoring of PM for several
units (kilns and clinker coolers);
7. the permit does not require prompt
reporting of permit violations;
8. the permit fails to require prompt
reporting of permit deviations;
9. the permit fails to require sufficient
periodic monitoring in Condition 6.1 for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition for Objection to
South Dakota State Operating Permit
for GCC Dacotah Cement
Manufacturing Plant, Rapid City, SD
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of direct final Order.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces that
the EPA Administrator has responded to
a citizens’ petition asking EPA to object
to a State operating permit issued by the
South Dakota Department of
Environmental and Natural Resources
(DENR). Specifically, the Administrator
has partially granted and partially
denied the petition submitted by Jeremy
Nichols, and the other Petitioners, to
object to the issuance of the operating
permit issued to GCC Dacotah Cement
Manufacturing Plant (‘‘GCC Dacotah’’),
located in Rapid City, South Dakota.
Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the
Clean Air Act (Act), Petitioners may
seek judicial review of those portions of
the petition which EPA denied in the
United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate Circuit. Any petition for
review shall be filed within 60 days of
the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register, pursuant to section
307(d) of the Act.
ADDRESSES: You may review copies of
the final Order, the petition, and other
supporting information at the
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado, 80202–1129 after June 30,
2007. EPA requests that you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view
the copies of these documents. You may
view these documents Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding
federal holidays. If you wish to examine
these documents, you should make an
appointment at least 24 hours before the
visiting day. The final Order is also
available electronically at each of the
following addresses: https://
www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/
air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/
dacotah_decision2006.pdf and https://
www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/
air/title5/petitiondb/petitiondb2006.htm
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Ajayi, Environmental
Engineer, Air and Radiation Program,
Office of Partnerships and Regulatory
Assistance, Mail Code 8P–AR, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Jul 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36451
the presence of uncombined water and/
or its effects on opacity;
10. the permit fails to require
sufficient periodic monitoring in
Condition 6.4 and it is unclear how Test
Method 201 (Method 201) will assure
compliance with established limits;
11. the permit fails to require
sufficient periodic monitoring in
Condition 6.8 to ensure compliance
with short-term BACT SO2 and CO
limits for kiln #6 system;
12. the permit is flawed in Condition
6.12 because it implies an affirmative
defense to the Permittee with respect to
injunction relief; and
13. the permit provides an
inappropriate broad exemption for
maintenance in Conditions 8.4 & 8.5 for
Continuous Emissions Monitoring
(CEMs) and Continuous Opacity
Monitors (COMs) which render the
Conditions unenforceable as a practical
matter.
On June 15, 2007, the Administrator
issued an Order in response to
Petitioners’ allegations outlined above.
The Order explains the reasons for
partially granting and partially denying
objection #2 and granting objection #8
and directs DENR to revise certain
permit conditions for clarification and/
or include applicable provisions in the
permit. The Order also directs DENR to
take specific steps to improve
compliance demonstration with certain
permit conditions. Finally, the Order
explains the reasons for denying the
Petitioners’ remaining claims.
Dated: June 22, 2007.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. E7–12852 Filed 7–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8334–5]
Notice of Disclosure of Confidential
Business Information Obtained Under
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act to Subcontractors of EPA
Contractor U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers: Science Applications
International Corporation, HarryTorchiana, and CACI, Inc.
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice, request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’) hereby
complies with the requirements of 40
CFR 2.310(h) for authorization to
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
36452
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 3, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
disclose confidential business
information (‘‘CBI’’) submitted to EPA
Region 9 pursuant to CERCLA to U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers’ contractors:
Science Applications International
Corporation (‘‘SAIC’’) of Santa Barbara,
California; Harry-Torchiana of San
Francisco, California; and CACI, Inc., of
Arlington, Virginia.
DATES: Comments may be submitted by
July 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent
to: Keith Olinger, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 9, SFD–7–5,
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105, (415) 972–3125.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith Olinger, Superfund Division,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 9, SFD–7–5, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415)
972–3125.
Notice of Required Determinations,
Contract Provisions and Opportunity to
Comment
The Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 (‘‘CERCLA’’) as amended,
(commonly known as ‘‘Superfund’’)
requires completion of enforcement
activities at Superfund sites in concert
with other site events. EPA has entered
into several contracts for enforcement
support in relation to the Operating
Industries, Inc. Superfund Site: (1)
Contract No. W91238–05–F–0062,
issued to SAIC by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (‘‘CoE’’) pursuant to
Interagency Agreement No. DW
96955495 between EPA and the CoE; (2)
Contract No. W91238–07–C–0008
issued to Harry-Torchiana by the CoE
pursuant to Interagency Agreement No.
DW 96955495 between EPA and the
CoE; and (3) Task Order 263 issued to
CACI, Inc. under the U.S. Department of
Justice’s (‘‘DOJ’’) MEGA2ALS contract,
Contract No. 02–C–0437, pursuant to
Interagency Agreement No. DW–15–
95566201–1 between EPA and DOJ.
Enforcement support services will be
provided to EPA by SAIC, HarryTorchiana, and CACI, Inc. EPA has
determined that disclosure of CBI to
SAIC, Harry-Torchiana, CACI, Inc., and
their respective employees, is necessary
in order for these companies to carry out
their respective work for EPA under
their respective contracts with the CoE
and DOJ, as applicable. The information
EPA intends to disclose includes
submissions made by Potentially
Responsible Parties to EPA in
accordance with EPA’s enforcement
activities at the Operating Industries
Inc., Superfund Site. The information
would be disclosed to the above-named
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Jul 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
contractors for any of the following
reasons: to assist with document
handling, inventory, and indexing; to
assist with document review and
analysis; to verify completeness; and to
provide technical review of submittals.
The respective contracts comply with
all requirements of 40 CFR 2.310(h)(2).
EPA Region 9 will require that each of
the respective subcontractors’
employees with access to CBI sign a
written agreement that he or she: (1)
Will use the information only for the
purpose of carrying out the work
required by the contract, (2) will refrain
from disclosing the information to
anyone other than EPA without prior
written approval of each affected
business or of an EPA legal office, and
(3) will return to EPA all copies of the
information (and any abstracts or
extracts therefrom) upon request from
the EPA program office, whenever the
information is no longer required by the
subcontractor for performance of the
work required by the subcontract or
upon completion of the subcontract.
Dated: April 6, 2007.
Keith Takata,
Director, Superfund Division, U.S. EPA,
Region IX.
[FR Doc. E7–12877 Filed 7–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8334–2]
Proposed Administrative Order on
Consent—Belden Cribbing Site
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice and request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As required by the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq., as
amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), notice is hereby
given that an Administrative Settlement
Agreement and Order on Consent for
Removal Action (‘‘Agreement’’) is
proposed by the United States, on behalf
of the Environmental Protection Agency
(‘‘EPA’’), and Union Pacific Railroad
Company (‘‘Union Pacific’’) for payment
of certain response costs and for
performance of a removal action at the
Belden Cribbing Site, in Eagle County,
Colorado (‘‘Site’’).
The Site is located in a steep canyon
on the slopes of Battle Mountain just
south of the historic mining mill station
of Belden, between the towns of
Minturn and Red Cliff, in Eagle County,
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Colorado. The Site includes at least
twenty-one significant waste rock piles
from former mining operations and a
series of deteriorating wood cribbings
holding up the waste piles, several of
which are located on Union Pacific’s
right-of-way along the river at the
bottom of the canyon. The removal
action will address the threat posed by
the potential collapse of the cribbing
structures and the resulting deposition
into the Eagle River of the waste rock.
Waste rock entering the river would
release large quantities of zinc, among
other metals, endangering the trout
fishery and other aquatic resources.
This Agreement requires Union
Pacific to provide EPA with site access
in order for EPA and its contractors to
conduct necessary response actions
within the Site in accordance with the
EPA’s June 2006 Action Memorandum.
Union Pacific will either remove the
track and ties on the Union Pacific rightof-way from Belden to the southern end
of the Repository or will cover such
track and ties in-place in order to create
the necessary temporary access road.
The Agreement also includes a grant of
permanent access on Union Pacific’s
right-of-way for a waste rock repository,
for seep collection systems and for
additional rock-fall protection devices.
EPA will construct and install the
necessary repository, rock-fall
protection devices and seep collection
systems, as described in the Action
Memorandum.
Under the Agreement, Union Pacific
will reimburse the United States a
portion of past and estimated future
response costs incurred or to be
incurred, respectively, by the United
States at or in connection with the Site.
EPA has notified the State of Colorado
of this action pursuant to Section 106(a)
of CERCLA.
DATES: Comments should be received by
August 2, 2007. The Agency will
consider all comments received on the
proposed Agreement and may modify or
withdraw its consent to the settlement
if comments received disclose facts or
considerations which indicate that the
settlement is inappropriate, improper or
inadequate. The Agency’s response to
any comments received will be available
for public inspection at the EPA
Superfund Record Center, 1595
Wynkoop Street, 3rd Floor, in Denver,
Colorado.
ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement
and additional background information
relating to the settlement are available
for public inspection at the EPA
Superfund Records Center, 1595
Wynkoop Street, 3rd Floor, in Denver,
Colorado. Comments and requests for a
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36451-36452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12877]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8334-5]
Notice of Disclosure of Confidential Business Information
Obtained Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act to Subcontractors of EPA Contractor U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers: Science Applications International Corporation, Harry-
Torchiana, and CACI, Inc.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice, request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') hereby
complies with the requirements of 40 CFR 2.310(h) for authorization to
[[Page 36452]]
disclose confidential business information (``CBI'') submitted to EPA
Region 9 pursuant to CERCLA to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'
contractors: Science Applications International Corporation (``SAIC'')
of Santa Barbara, California; Harry-Torchiana of San Francisco,
California; and CACI, Inc., of Arlington, Virginia.
DATES: Comments may be submitted by July 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to: Keith Olinger, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 9, SFD-7-5, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 972-3125.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Olinger, Superfund Division,
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, SFD-7-5, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 972-3125.
Notice of Required Determinations, Contract Provisions and Opportunity
to Comment
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (``CERCLA'') as amended, (commonly known as
``Superfund'') requires completion of enforcement activities at
Superfund sites in concert with other site events. EPA has entered into
several contracts for enforcement support in relation to the Operating
Industries, Inc. Superfund Site: (1) Contract No. W91238-05-F-0062,
issued to SAIC by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (``CoE'') pursuant
to Interagency Agreement No. DW 96955495 between EPA and the CoE; (2)
Contract No. W91238-07-C-0008 issued to Harry-Torchiana by the CoE
pursuant to Interagency Agreement No. DW 96955495 between EPA and the
CoE; and (3) Task Order 263 issued to CACI, Inc. under the U.S.
Department of Justice's (``DOJ'') MEGA2ALS contract, Contract No. 02-C-
0437, pursuant to Interagency Agreement No. DW-15-95566201-1 between
EPA and DOJ. Enforcement support services will be provided to EPA by
SAIC, Harry-Torchiana, and CACI, Inc. EPA has determined that
disclosure of CBI to SAIC, Harry-Torchiana, CACI, Inc., and their
respective employees, is necessary in order for these companies to
carry out their respective work for EPA under their respective
contracts with the CoE and DOJ, as applicable. The information EPA
intends to disclose includes submissions made by Potentially
Responsible Parties to EPA in accordance with EPA's enforcement
activities at the Operating Industries Inc., Superfund Site. The
information would be disclosed to the above-named contractors for any
of the following reasons: to assist with document handling, inventory,
and indexing; to assist with document review and analysis; to verify
completeness; and to provide technical review of submittals. The
respective contracts comply with all requirements of 40 CFR
2.310(h)(2). EPA Region 9 will require that each of the respective
subcontractors' employees with access to CBI sign a written agreement
that he or she: (1) Will use the information only for the purpose of
carrying out the work required by the contract, (2) will refrain from
disclosing the information to anyone other than EPA without prior
written approval of each affected business or of an EPA legal office,
and (3) will return to EPA all copies of the information (and any
abstracts or extracts therefrom) upon request from the EPA program
office, whenever the information is no longer required by the
subcontractor for performance of the work required by the subcontract
or upon completion of the subcontract.
Dated: April 6, 2007.
Keith Takata,
Director, Superfund Division, U.S. EPA, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E7-12877 Filed 7-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P