Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80C2A5F Turbofan Engines, 35366-35368 [E7-12490]
Download as PDF
35366
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 124
Thursday, June 28, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation Administration
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company (GE) CF6–80C2A5F
Turbofan Engines
14 CFR Parts 1, 101, 400, and 401
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28172; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NE–23–AD]
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27390; Notice No.
07–06]
RIN 2120–AI88
Requirements for Amateur Rocket
Activities; Correction
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rule;
correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects the
docket number to a proposed rule
published in the Federal Register of
Thursday, June 14, 2007, regarding
Requirements for Amateur Rocket
Activities.
The comment period will close
September 12, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles P. Brinkman, telephone: (202)
493–4562, or E-mail:
phil.brinkman@faa.gov.
DATES:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Correction
In proposed rule Requirements for
Amateur Rocket Activities beginning on
page 32816 in the Federal Register issue
of June 14, 2007, make the following
corrections.
1. On page 32816, in the first column,
fourth line of the heading, ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–27310’’ should have read,
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2007–27390.’’
2. On page 32816, in the first column,
in the ADDRESSES paragraph, in the
second and third lines, ‘‘Docket Number
FAA–2007–27310’’ should have read
‘‘Docket Number FAA–2007–27390.’’
Issued in Washington, DC on June 21,
2007.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E7–12463 Filed 6–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jun 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for GE
CF6–80C2A5F turbofan engines
installed on Airbus A300 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require removing previous software
versions from the engine electronic
control unit (ECU). Engines with new
version software will have increased
margin to flameout. This proposed AD
results from reports of engine flameout
events during flight, including reports of
events where all engines simultaneously
experienced a flameout or other adverse
operation. Although the root cause
investigation is not yet complete, we
believe that exposure to ice crystals
during flight is associated with these
flameout events. We are proposing this
AD to minimize the potential of an allengine flameout event caused by ice
accretion and shedding during flight.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by August 27,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
You can get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
General Electric Company via Lockheed
Martin Technology Services, 10525
Chester Road, Suite C, Cincinnati, Ohio
45215, telephone (513) 672–8400, fax
(513) 672–8422.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Golinski, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
e-mail: john.golinski@faa.gov;
telephone: (781) 238–7135, fax: (781)
238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2007–28712; Directorate Identifier
2007–NE–23–AD’’ in the subject line of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the DOT
Web site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 124 / Thursday, June 28, 2007 / Proposed Rules
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is the same as the Mail
address provided in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Discussion
GE CF6–80C2 and CF6–80E1 series
turbofan engines continue to experience
flameout events caused by ice accretion
and shedding into the engine during
flight. Although the investigation is not
yet complete, we believe that the ice
accretion is caused by exposure to ice
crystals during flight. Industry reports
34 airplane flameout events, including
reports of multi-engine events where all
engines on the airplane simultaneously
experienced a flameout. Some of these
events had high pressure compressor
blade damage that may have been
caused by impact with shedding ice. In
all events, the engines restarted and
continued to operate normally for the
remainder of the flight.
This proposed AD addresses only the
CF6–80C2A5F turbofan engines,
installed on Airbus A300 series
airplanes. We believe this model of
CF6–80C2 engine is susceptible to
flameouts caused by ice accretion and
shedding into the engine during flight.
Similar AD actions for other CF6–80C2
and CF6–80E1 series engines may be
forthcoming.
We view an all-engine flameout event
as an unsafe condition particularly for
low-altitude events, or other factors that
might result in the inability to restart
the engines and regain control of the
airplane. Since some aspects of this
problem are not completely understood,
this proposed AD is considered an
interim action due to GE’s on-going
investigation. Future AD action might
become necessary based on the results
of the investigation and field
experience. This condition of
insufficient margin to engine flameout
due to ice accretion and shedding
during flight, if not addressed, could
result in an all-engine flameout event
during flight.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the
technical contents of GE Service
Bulletin (SB) No. CF6–80C2 S/B 73–
0352, dated February 7, 2007. That SB
describes procedures for removing
certain software versions from the ECU,
and installing a software version that is
FAA-approved. The new FAA-approved
software version described in the SB
modifies the variable bleed valve
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jun 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
schedule, which will provide an
increased margin to flameout. This
increased margin is expected to reduce
the rate of flameout occurrences due to
ice accretion and shedding during flight.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. We are proposing this AD,
which would require removing certain
software versions from the engine ECU.
Interim Action
These actions are interim actions due
to the on-going investigation. We may
take further rulemaking actions in the
future, based on the results of the
investigation and field experience.
35367
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. You may get a copy
of this summary at the address listed
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 81 CF6–80C2A5F turbofan
engines installed on Airbus A300 series
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate it would take about 3.5 workhours per ECU to perform the proposed
actions. The average labor rate is $80
per work-hour. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost to U.S. operators to
be $22,680. Our cost estimate is
exclusive of warranty coverage.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA–
2007–28172; Directorate Identifier 2007–
NE–23–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by
August 27, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric
Company (GE) CF6–80C2A5F turbofan
engines, installed on Airbus A300 series
airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of engine
flameout events during flight, including
reports of events where all engines
simultaneously experienced a flameout or
other adverse operation. We are issuing this
AD to minimize the potential of an all-engine
flameout event, due to ice accretion and
shedding during flight. Exposure to ice
crystals during flight is believed to be
associated with these flameout events.
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
35368
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 124 / Thursday, June 28, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Compliance
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Interim Action
(f) These actions are interim actions due to
the on-going investigation, and we may take
further rulemaking actions in the future
based on the results of the investigation and
field experience.
Engine ECU Software Removal
(h) You may use an ECU installed on an
engine with a software version of 8.4.E or
older for no longer than 24 months after the
effective date of this AD.
(i) Once software version 8.4.E or older has
been removed and new FAA-approved
software version is installed in an ECU,
reverting to version 8.4.E or older of ECU
software in that ECU is prohibited.
(j) After 24 months from the effective date
of this AD, use of an ECU with a software
version of 8.4.E or older is prohibited.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
Special Flight Permits
(l) Special flight permits are not
authorized.
Related Information
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
(m) Information on removing ECU software
and installing new software, which provides
increased margin to flameout, can be found
in GE Service Bulletin No. CF6–80C2 S/B 73–
0352 dated February 7, 2007.
(n) Contact John Golinski, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; email: john.golinski@faa.gov;
telephone: (781) 238–7135, fax: (781) 238–
7199, for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
June 22, 2007.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–12490 Filed 6–27–07; 8:45 am]
14:52 Jun 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28379; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–077–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
Previous Software Versions of ECU Software
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14 CFR Part 39
AGENCY:
(g) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, remove software version
8.4.E or older versions, from the engine
ECUs, part numbers 1797M63P01,
1797M63P02, 1797M63P03, 1797M63P04,
1797M63P05, 1820M99P01, 1820M99P02,
1820M99P03, 1820M99P04, and
1820M99P05.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Aviation Administration
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special
Federal Aviation Regulation 88). * * *
Under this regulation, all holders of type
certificates for passenger transport aircraft
* * * are required to conduct a design
review against explosion risks. This
Airworthiness Directive (AD), which renders
mandatory the modification of the fuel pump
wiring against short circuit, is a consequence
of this design review.
The unsafe condition is chafing of the
fuel pump cables, which could result in
short circuits leading to fuel pump
failure, intermittent operation, arcing,
and possible fuel tank explosion. The
proposed AD would require actions that
are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Stafford, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1622;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new
process for streamlining the issuance of
ADs related to MCAI. This streamlined
process will allow us to adopt MCAI
safety requirements in a more efficient
manner and will reduce safety risks to
the public. This process continues to
follow all FAA AD issuance processes to
meet legal, economic, Administrative
Procedure Act, and Federal Register
requirements. We also continue to meet
our technical decision-making
responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated
products.
This proposed AD references the
MCAI and related service information
that we considered in forming the
engineering basis to correct the unsafe
condition. The proposed AD contains
text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain
language principles.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–28379; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–077–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 124 (Thursday, June 28, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35366-35368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12490]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-28172; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-23-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) CF6-
80C2A5F Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for GE CF6-80C2A5F turbofan engines installed on Airbus A300 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would require removing previous software
versions from the engine electronic control unit (ECU). Engines with
new version software will have increased margin to flameout. This
proposed AD results from reports of engine flameout events during
flight, including reports of events where all engines simultaneously
experienced a flameout or other adverse operation. Although the root
cause investigation is not yet complete, we believe that exposure to
ice crystals during flight is associated with these flameout events. We
are proposing this AD to minimize the potential of an all-engine
flameout event caused by ice accretion and shedding during flight.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by August 27,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
You can get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from General Electric Company via Lockheed Martin Technology Services,
10525 Chester Road, Suite C, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215, telephone (513)
672-8400, fax (513) 672-8422.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Golinski, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
john.golinski@faa.gov; telephone: (781) 238-7135, fax: (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-28712;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-23-AD'' in the subject line of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of the
DOT Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
[[Page 35367]]
The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is the same as the
Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
GE CF6-80C2 and CF6-80E1 series turbofan engines continue to
experience flameout events caused by ice accretion and shedding into
the engine during flight. Although the investigation is not yet
complete, we believe that the ice accretion is caused by exposure to
ice crystals during flight. Industry reports 34 airplane flameout
events, including reports of multi-engine events where all engines on
the airplane simultaneously experienced a flameout. Some of these
events had high pressure compressor blade damage that may have been
caused by impact with shedding ice. In all events, the engines
restarted and continued to operate normally for the remainder of the
flight.
This proposed AD addresses only the CF6-80C2A5F turbofan engines,
installed on Airbus A300 series airplanes. We believe this model of
CF6-80C2 engine is susceptible to flameouts caused by ice accretion and
shedding into the engine during flight. Similar AD actions for other
CF6-80C2 and CF6-80E1 series engines may be forthcoming.
We view an all-engine flameout event as an unsafe condition
particularly for low-altitude events, or other factors that might
result in the inability to restart the engines and regain control of
the airplane. Since some aspects of this problem are not completely
understood, this proposed AD is considered an interim action due to
GE's on-going investigation. Future AD action might become necessary
based on the results of the investigation and field experience. This
condition of insufficient margin to engine flameout due to ice
accretion and shedding during flight, if not addressed, could result in
an all-engine flameout event during flight.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the technical contents of GE Service
Bulletin (SB) No. CF6-80C2 S/B 73-0352, dated February 7, 2007. That SB
describes procedures for removing certain software versions from the
ECU, and installing a software version that is FAA-approved. The new
FAA-approved software version described in the SB modifies the variable
bleed valve schedule, which will provide an increased margin to
flameout. This increased margin is expected to reduce the rate of
flameout occurrences due to ice accretion and shedding during flight.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. We are proposing this AD, which would require
removing certain software versions from the engine ECU.
Interim Action
These actions are interim actions due to the on-going
investigation. We may take further rulemaking actions in the future,
based on the results of the investigation and field experience.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 81 CF6-80C2A5F
turbofan engines installed on Airbus A300 series airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate it would take about 3.5 work-hours per ECU
to perform the proposed actions. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost to U.S.
operators to be $22,680. Our cost estimate is exclusive of warranty
coverage.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2007-28172; Directorate
Identifier 2007-NE-23-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by August 27,
2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80C2A5F
turbofan engines, installed on Airbus A300 series airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of engine flameout events
during flight, including reports of events where all engines
simultaneously experienced a flameout or other adverse operation. We
are issuing this AD to minimize the potential of an all-engine
flameout event, due to ice accretion and shedding during flight.
Exposure to ice crystals during flight is believed to be associated
with these flameout events.
[[Page 35368]]
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Interim Action
(f) These actions are interim actions due to the on-going
investigation, and we may take further rulemaking actions in the
future based on the results of the investigation and field
experience.
Engine ECU Software Removal
(g) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, remove
software version 8.4.E or older versions, from the engine ECUs, part
numbers 1797M63P01, 1797M63P02, 1797M63P03, 1797M63P04, 1797M63P05,
1820M99P01, 1820M99P02, 1820M99P03, 1820M99P04, and 1820M99P05.
Previous Software Versions of ECU Software
(h) You may use an ECU installed on an engine with a software
version of 8.4.E or older for no longer than 24 months after the
effective date of this AD.
(i) Once software version 8.4.E or older has been removed and
new FAA-approved software version is installed in an ECU, reverting
to version 8.4.E or older of ECU software in that ECU is prohibited.
(j) After 24 months from the effective date of this AD, use of
an ECU with a software version of 8.4.E or older is prohibited.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Special Flight Permits
(l) Special flight permits are not authorized.
Related Information
(m) Information on removing ECU software and installing new
software, which provides increased margin to flameout, can be found
in GE Service Bulletin No. CF6-80C2 S/B 73-0352 dated February 7,
2007.
(n) Contact John Golinski, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; email:
john.golinski@faa.gov; telephone: (781) 238-7135, fax: (781) 238-
7199, for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on June 22, 2007.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-12490 Filed 6-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P