Federal Travel Regulation; Relocation Allowances-Standard Mileage Rate for Moving Purposes, 35187-35189 [E7-12433]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of the FFDCA,
such as the tolerance in this final rule,
do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. This
final rule directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of section
408(n)(4) of the FFDCA. As such, the
Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
on States or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) do not apply
to this rule. In addition, This rule does
not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104–4). This action does
not involve any technical standards that
would require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:51 Jun 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 7, 2007.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Commodity
Parts per million
*
*
*
Papaya ............................
*
*
*
Sapodilla .........................
Sapote, black ..................
Sapote, mamey ..............
*
*
*
Star apple .......................
*
*
*
*
*
*
35187
*
*
*
*
*
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
*
*
*
*
0.90
*
[FR Doc. E7–12161 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 302–4
[FTR Amendment 2007–03; FTR Case 2007–
301; Docket 2007–0002, Sequence 3]
RIN 3090–AI34
Federal Travel Regulation; Relocation
Allowances—Standard Mileage Rate
for Moving Purposes
Office of Governmentwide
Policy, General Services Administration
(GSA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.511 is amended in
paragraph (a) in the table as follows:
I i. By removing the entry for ‘‘Grape,
raisin’’;
I ii. By alphabetically adding ‘‘Apricot’’
and ‘‘Fruit, stone, group 12, except
apricot and peach’’; and
I iii. By revising the entries for
‘‘Canistel,’’ ‘‘Grape,’’ ‘‘Mango,’’
‘‘Papaya,’’ ‘‘Sapodilla,’’ ‘‘Sapote, black,’’
‘‘Sapote, mamey,’’ and ‘‘Star apple.’’
The amendments read as follows:
I
SUMMARY: The General Services
Administration (GSA), Office of
Governmentwide Policy (OGP), plans to
establish the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) Standard Mileage Rate for moving
purposes as the rate at which agencies
will reimburse an employee for using a
privately owned vehicle (POV) for
relocation. The FTR and any
corresponding documents may be
accessed at GSA’s website at https://
www.gsa.gov/ftr.
DATES: Effective Date: September 25,
2007.
The
Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), Room
4035, GS Building, Washington, DC,
20405, (202) 501–4755, for information
§ 180.511 Buprofezin; tolerances for
pertaining to status or publication
residues.
schedules. For clarification of content,
(a) * * *
contact Mr. Ed Davis, Office of
Governmentwide Policy (M), Office of
Commodity
Parts per million
Travel, Transportation and Asset
Management (MT), General Services
*
*
*
*
*
Apricot .............................
9.0 Administration at (202) 208–7638 or email at ed.davis@gsa.gov. Please cite
*
*
*
*
*
Canistel ...........................
0.90 FTR Amendment 2007–03; FTR case
*
*
*
*
*
2007–301.
Fruit, stone, group 12,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
except apricot and
peach ..........................
*
*
*
Grape ..............................
*
*
*
Mango .............................
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1.9
Relocation is an area that
continuously evolves because of
changes in the housing market,
*
*
A. Background
2.5
*
*
Sfmt 4700
0.90
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
35188
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
transportation industry, technology, etc.
The General Services Administration
(GSA), Office of Governmentwide Policy
(OGP), routinely reviews the relocation
regulations to address current
Government relocation needs, to
incorporate appropriate private industry
policies, and to implement any best
practices that fit well into the Federal
setting.
To help accomplish these goals, GSA
created the Relocation Best Practices
Committee (RBPC) in 2002. Many of this
Committee’s recommendations were
reflected in a proposed rule published
in the Federal Register at 69 FR 68111,
November 23, 2004.
The proposed rule included 30
changes; however, this final rule focuses
on only one of those proposed changes,
namely adopting the mileage rate
established by the IRS for computing
relocation, or moving, costs for income
tax purposes for reimbursing Federal
employees for using their POVs for
relocation travel to a new duty station
for PCS. GSA will address the remaining
Federal Travel Regulation (FTR)
changes from the proposed rule in one
or more future final rule(s).
Section 302–4.300 of the FTR (41 CFR
302–4.300) currently provides tiered
reimbursements for POV use in en route
travel to the new duty station based on
the number of occupants. This final rule
will eliminate the tiered rates. Instead,
the agency will reimburse the employee
who relocates by POV at the established
IRS rate for use of a car for moving
purposes. GSA will publish this rate in
an FTR Bulletin to coincide with
updates issued by the IRS. The IRS
generally issues such updates annually,
but for special cases, such as Hurricane
Katrina, the IRS may issue updates
during the year and GSA will follow
suit.
The IRS allows two methods for
computing the standard mileage rates
for use of a car in moving: a single
mileage rate or actual expense. GSA has
decided to allow only reimbursement at
the single mileage rate, since this
approach is easier to administer and
does not involve collecting and auditing
small value receipts.
Many transferees compare the
reimbursement rate for using a POV for
temporary duty travel (TDY) to the rate
for using a POV for relocation travel and
do not understand why those rates
differ. The more generous rate for using
a POV for TDY travel is intended to
cover the fixed costs of operating an
automobile, such as depreciation (or
lease payments), insurance, and license
and registration fees, as well as the
operating cost. None of these fixed costs
are tax deductible as a moving expense,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:11 Jun 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
so none of these fixed costs are included
in the moving rate mileage calculation.
The IRS intends the rate for using a POV
in moving to cover only actual operating
expenses (e.g., fuel, oil, tolls, etc.). The
IRS then uses the operating costs for a
combination of standard vehicles to
calculate the moving rate.
GSA consulted the members of the
Executive Relocation Steering
Committee about this change. All
members agreed that this adoption of
the single IRS rate is appropriate.
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., does not apply.
B. Summary of Comments Received and
the Issues Involved
E. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
GSA received comments from 12
entities on the proposed mileage rate
change that was included in the
proposed rule published in the Federal
Register at 69 FR 68111, November 23,
2004. The main thrust of the comments
was that payments to employees driving
their automobiles should not be
lowered. This argument was valid in
2004, at the time the proposed rule was
issued. The IRS rate for using an
automobile for relocation at that time
was 14 cents per mile, which was lower
than any rate on the FTR chart. The IRS
rate for 2007 will be 20 cents per mile,
which means that all drivers regardless
of the number of passengers, will be
receiving the equivalent of the highest
possible rate in the current regulation.
Another objection to the proposed
rule was that small agencies or isolated
posts might not receive the GSA updates
on the mileage rate. This has not been
the case for the TDY mileage rate.
Agencies adopt the TDY mileage rate
quickly and accurately when it changes.
GSA expects this to be the same for the
relocation mileage rate.
This final rule is also exempt from
congressional review prescribed under 5
U.S.C. 801 since it relates solely to
agency management and personnel.
C. Changes to Current FTR
This final rule:
• Revises section 302–4.300 to reflect
the Internal Revenue Service single
mileage rate for relocation by POV.
• Adds section 302–4.303 to disallow
the use of the IRS actual expense rate for
relocation in CONUS.
D. Executive Order 12866
This regulation is excepted from the
definition of ‘‘regulation’’ or ‘‘rule’’
under Section 3(d)(3) of Executive Order
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
dated September 30, 1993 and,
therefore, was not subject to review
under Section 6(b) of that executive
order.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule is not required to be
published in the Federal Register for
notice and comment; therefore, the
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the changes to the
FTR do not impose recordkeeping or
information collection requirements, or
the collection of information from
offerors, contractors, or members of the
public that require the approval of the
Office of Management and Budget under
44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 302–4
Government employees, Relocation,
Travel and transportation Expenses.
Dated: March 19, 2007.
Lurita Doan,
Administrator of General Services.
For the reasons set out in this
preamble, 41 CFR part 302–4 is
amended as set forth below:
I
PART 302–4—ALLOWANCES FOR
SUBSISTENCE AND
TRANSPORTATION
1. The authority citation for 41 CFR
part 302–4 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5738; 20 U.S.C. 905(a);
E.O. 11609, 36 FR 13747, 3 CFR, 1971–1973
Comp., p. 586.
2. Revise § 302–4.300 to read as
follows:
I
§ 302–4.300 What is the POV mileage rate
for PCS travel within the continental United
States (CONUS)?
For approved/authorized PCS travel
by POV in CONUS, the mileage
reimbursement rate is the same as the
moving expense standard mileage rate
established by the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) for moving expense
deductions. See IRS guidance available
on the Internet at www.irs.gov. GSA will
publish the rate for mileage
reimbursement in an FTR Bulletin on an
intermittent basis to coincide with the
rate changes published by the IRS. You
may find the FTR Bulletins at
www.gsa.gov/relo.
I 3. Add § 302–4.303 to read as follows:
§ 302–4.303 For relocation within the
continental United States (CONUS), may I
use the actual expense method of
reimbursement instead of the POV mileage
rate specified in § 302–4.300?
No, for a PCS relocation within
CONUS involving POV usage, your
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 27, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
agency will reimburse you at the
standard mileage rate specified in
§ 302–4.300.
[FR Doc. E7–12433 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–S
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 76
[FCC 07–115]
Interim Electronic Filing Procedures
for Certain Commission Filings
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Temporary rule; rescission.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission rescinds the procedures it
adopted in 2001 on an emergency,
interim basis to require the filing or refiling of certain documents
electronically (i.e., by facsimile or email), by overnight delivery, or by hand
delivery to the Commission’s Capitol
Heights, Maryland location. Filings will
no longer be accepted by e-mail or
facsimile, unless specifically authorized
by the Commission’s rules.
DATES: Effective September 25, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th St., SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denise D. Walter, Mobility Division,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at
(202) 418–0620.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Order;
FCC 07–115, adopted June 18, 2007, and
released June 20, 2007. The full text of
this document is available for
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC Reference
Center, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete
text may be purchased from the
Commission’s copy contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street,
SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC
20554. The full text may also be
downloaded at: https://www.fcc.gov.
Alternative formats are available to
persons with disabilities by sending an
e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or by calling
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Synopsis of the Order
By an Order published at 66 FR
62991, December 4, 2001, the
Commission amended its procedural
rules ‘‘on an emergency, interim basis’’
to permit certain pleadings (specifically,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:11 Jun 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
(i) Petitions to deny filed pursuant to
section 309 of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C.
309; (ii) petitions for reconsideration
filed pursuant to section 405 of the Act,
47 U.S.C. 405; (iii) applications for
review filed pursuant to section 5(c)(4)
of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 155(c)(4); (iv)
informal requests for Commission action
involving pending applications filed
pursuant to § 1.41 of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 1.41; (v) petitions to
amend the TV and FM Broadcast Table
of Allotments and responsive pleadings;
and (vi) comments or oppositions to
open video system certification made
pursuant to § 76.1502(e)(1) of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR
76.1502(e)(1)) to be filed electronically
(i.e., by facsimile or e-mail) ‘‘[u]ntil
further notice.’’ It adopted these
procedures in response to ‘‘recent
emergency events in Washington, DC,
resulting in the unforeseeable and
understandable disruption of regular
mail delivery and of the processing of
other deliveries due to the threat of
contamination,’’ i.e., the discovery of
anthrax contamination on Capitol Hill
and at certain U.S. Postal Service mail
processing facilities, and the consequent
delay in mail processing due to
quarantine and cleansing procedures
associated with the anthrax
contamination. The Commission stated,
‘‘[T]hese emergency procedures are
adopted on a temporary basis only, and
will be discontinued when normal U.S.
Mail delivery resumes.’’
We note that mail delivery in the
Washington, DC area has improved, and
that the United States Postal Service has
greatly reduced the delay in processing
mail. We also note that the Commission
has expanded it electronic filing
capabilities, and implemented its own
processes to combat the threat of
contamination of incoming mail. Given
these circumstances, we conclude that
the interim electronic filing procedures
adopted by the Commission in 2001 are
no longer necessary. Accordingly, we
rescind those procedures, effective
ninety days after publication of this
Order in the Federal Register. (This
includes elimination of interim
facsimile number 202–418–0187 and the
following Office of the Secretary Bureau
and Office e-mail addresses:
MMBSecretary@fcc.gov;
WTBSecretary@fcc.gov;
CCBSecretary@fcc.gov;
CSBSecretary@fcc.gov;
IBSecretary@fcc.gov;
EBSecretary@fcc.gov;
OtherSecretary@fcc.gov.) Thereafter,
filings will no longer be accepted by
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35189
facsimile or e-mail, unless specifically
authorized by the Commission’s rules.
Pursuant to the authority of section
4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), the
interim electronic filing procedures
adopted in Order FCC 01–345, at 66 FR
62991, December 4, 2001, are rescinded.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–12539 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 07–2390]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Hemet,
CA
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; grant of petition for
reconsideration.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document grants a
Petition for Reconsideration filed by
Southern California Public Radio in
response to the staff letter dated March
18, 2004, returning its Petition for Rule
Making, which requested the
reservation of FM Channel 273A at
Hemet, California for noncommercial
educational use. This document also
denies a Petition for Reconsideration
filed by Maranatha Ministries of Hemet
directed to the staff letter dated March
18, 2004, returning its Petition for Rule
Making, requesting the reservation of
vacant FM Channel 273A at Hemet,
California for noncommercial
educational use.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau (202)
418–2180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s
Memorandum Opinion and Order,
adopted June 6, 2007, and released June
8, 2007. The full text of this decision is
available for inspection and copying
during normal business hours in the
FCC Reference Information Center at
Portals II, CY–A257, 445 12th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20554. The
complete text of this decision may also
be purchased from the Commission’s
copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing,
Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–
B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone
1–800–378–3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. This document is
not subject to the Congressional Review
Act. (The Commission will not send a
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 27, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35187-35189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12433]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 302-4
[FTR Amendment 2007-03; FTR Case 2007-301; Docket 2007-0002, Sequence
3]
RIN 3090-AI34
Federal Travel Regulation; Relocation Allowances--Standard
Mileage Rate for Moving Purposes
AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA), Office of
Governmentwide Policy (OGP), plans to establish the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) Standard Mileage Rate for moving purposes as the rate at
which agencies will reimburse an employee for using a privately owned
vehicle (POV) for relocation. The FTR and any corresponding documents
may be accessed at GSA's website at https://www.gsa.gov/ftr.
DATES: Effective Date: September 25, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), Room
4035, GS Building, Washington, DC, 20405, (202) 501-4755, for
information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For
clarification of content, contact Mr. Ed Davis, Office of
Governmentwide Policy (M), Office of Travel, Transportation and Asset
Management (MT), General Services Administration at (202) 208-7638 or
e-mail at ed.davis@gsa.gov. Please cite FTR Amendment 2007-03; FTR case
2007-301.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Relocation is an area that continuously evolves because of changes
in the housing market,
[[Page 35188]]
transportation industry, technology, etc. The General Services
Administration (GSA), Office of Governmentwide Policy (OGP), routinely
reviews the relocation regulations to address current Government
relocation needs, to incorporate appropriate private industry policies,
and to implement any best practices that fit well into the Federal
setting.
To help accomplish these goals, GSA created the Relocation Best
Practices Committee (RBPC) in 2002. Many of this Committee's
recommendations were reflected in a proposed rule published in the
Federal Register at 69 FR 68111, November 23, 2004.
The proposed rule included 30 changes; however, this final rule
focuses on only one of those proposed changes, namely adopting the
mileage rate established by the IRS for computing relocation, or
moving, costs for income tax purposes for reimbursing Federal employees
for using their POVs for relocation travel to a new duty station for
PCS. GSA will address the remaining Federal Travel Regulation (FTR)
changes from the proposed rule in one or more future final rule(s).
Section 302-4.300 of the FTR (41 CFR 302-4.300) currently provides
tiered reimbursements for POV use in en route travel to the new duty
station based on the number of occupants. This final rule will
eliminate the tiered rates. Instead, the agency will reimburse the
employee who relocates by POV at the established IRS rate for use of a
car for moving purposes. GSA will publish this rate in an FTR Bulletin
to coincide with updates issued by the IRS. The IRS generally issues
such updates annually, but for special cases, such as Hurricane
Katrina, the IRS may issue updates during the year and GSA will follow
suit.
The IRS allows two methods for computing the standard mileage rates
for use of a car in moving: a single mileage rate or actual expense.
GSA has decided to allow only reimbursement at the single mileage rate,
since this approach is easier to administer and does not involve
collecting and auditing small value receipts.
Many transferees compare the reimbursement rate for using a POV for
temporary duty travel (TDY) to the rate for using a POV for relocation
travel and do not understand why those rates differ. The more generous
rate for using a POV for TDY travel is intended to cover the fixed
costs of operating an automobile, such as depreciation (or lease
payments), insurance, and license and registration fees, as well as the
operating cost. None of these fixed costs are tax deductible as a
moving expense, so none of these fixed costs are included in the moving
rate mileage calculation. The IRS intends the rate for using a POV in
moving to cover only actual operating expenses (e.g., fuel, oil, tolls,
etc.). The IRS then uses the operating costs for a combination of
standard vehicles to calculate the moving rate.
GSA consulted the members of the Executive Relocation Steering
Committee about this change. All members agreed that this adoption of
the single IRS rate is appropriate.
B. Summary of Comments Received and the Issues Involved
GSA received comments from 12 entities on the proposed mileage rate
change that was included in the proposed rule published in the Federal
Register at 69 FR 68111, November 23, 2004. The main thrust of the
comments was that payments to employees driving their automobiles
should not be lowered. This argument was valid in 2004, at the time the
proposed rule was issued. The IRS rate for using an automobile for
relocation at that time was 14 cents per mile, which was lower than any
rate on the FTR chart. The IRS rate for 2007 will be 20 cents per mile,
which means that all drivers regardless of the number of passengers,
will be receiving the equivalent of the highest possible rate in the
current regulation.
Another objection to the proposed rule was that small agencies or
isolated posts might not receive the GSA updates on the mileage rate.
This has not been the case for the TDY mileage rate. Agencies adopt the
TDY mileage rate quickly and accurately when it changes. GSA expects
this to be the same for the relocation mileage rate.
C. Changes to Current FTR
This final rule:
Revises section 302-4.300 to reflect the Internal Revenue
Service single mileage rate for relocation by POV.
Adds section 302-4.303 to disallow the use of the IRS
actual expense rate for relocation in CONUS.
D. Executive Order 12866
This regulation is excepted from the definition of ``regulation''
or ``rule'' under Section 3(d)(3) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993 and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of that executive order.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule is not required to be published in the Federal
Register for notice and comment; therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., does not apply.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to
the FTR do not impose recordkeeping or information collection
requirements, or the collection of information from offerors,
contractors, or members of the public that require the approval of the
Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
E. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This final rule is also exempt from congressional review prescribed
under 5 U.S.C. 801 since it relates solely to agency management and
personnel.
List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 302-4
Government employees, Relocation, Travel and transportation
Expenses.
Dated: March 19, 2007.
Lurita Doan,
Administrator of General Services.
0
For the reasons set out in this preamble, 41 CFR part 302-4 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 302-4--ALLOWANCES FOR SUBSISTENCE AND TRANSPORTATION
0
1. The authority citation for 41 CFR part 302-4 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5738; 20 U.S.C. 905(a); E.O. 11609, 36 FR
13747, 3 CFR, 1971-1973 Comp., p. 586.
0
2. Revise Sec. 302-4.300 to read as follows:
Sec. 302-4.300 What is the POV mileage rate for PCS travel within the
continental United States (CONUS)?
For approved/authorized PCS travel by POV in CONUS, the mileage
reimbursement rate is the same as the moving expense standard mileage
rate established by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for moving
expense deductions. See IRS guidance available on the Internet at
www.irs.gov. GSA will publish the rate for mileage reimbursement in an
FTR Bulletin on an intermittent basis to coincide with the rate changes
published by the IRS. You may find the FTR Bulletins at www.gsa.gov/
relo.
0
3. Add Sec. 302-4.303 to read as follows:
Sec. 302-4.303 For relocation within the continental United States
(CONUS), may I use the actual expense method of reimbursement instead
of the POV mileage rate specified in Sec. 302-4.300?
No, for a PCS relocation within CONUS involving POV usage, your
[[Page 35189]]
agency will reimburse you at the standard mileage rate specified in
Sec. 302-4.300.
[FR Doc. E7-12433 Filed 6-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-S