Patent Term Extension, 35222-35224 [E7-12410]
Download as PDF
35222
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 27, 2007 / Notices
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping.
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to
liquidate without regard to dumping
duties entries of the subject
merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse for consumption on or after
November 29, 2006 (the effective date of
this revocation), and to discontinue
collection of cash deposits of
antidumping duties for entries of subject
merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse for consumption on or after
November 29, 2006.
This notice serves as a final reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary material
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
This sunset review and notice are in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752,
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 20, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Appendix - Issues in Decision
Memorandum
1. Whether ‘‘other factors’’ require that
the Department consider two recent
World Trade Organization (‘‘WTO’’)
determinations with respect to zeroing
2. Whether the Department’s conclusion
in the April 9, 2007, ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of the Section 129
Determinations’’ (‘‘Final Section 129
Determination’’) to revoke the order
undermines the validity of Preliminary
Results
3. Whether the Department’s
implementation in ‘‘Final Section 129
Determination’’ of WTO rulings
pertaining to zeroing undermines the
validity of Preliminary Results
4. Whether the recalculated weighted–
average margin of zero percent for Corus
Staal in ‘‘Final Section 129
Determination’’ undermines the ‘‘likely
margin to prevail’’ if the order were
revoked that was referenced in
Preliminary Results
5. Whether the Department may rely on
the presumptions embodied in Policies
Regarding the Conduct of Five–year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy
Bulletin, 63 FR 18871, 18872 (April 16,
1998) (‘‘Sunset Review Policy Bulletin’’)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Jun 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
6. Whether the Department’s decision in
‘‘Final Section 129 Determination’’ to
revoke the order means that Corus Staal
will not dump in the future
7. Whether Sunset Review Policy
Bulletin presupposes a validly issued
order and would not apply in the
absence of a validly issued order
8. Whether the Department may rely on
margins calculated in administrative
reviews based on zeroing
9. Whether domestic producers’
withdrawals of administrative review
requests prevented meaningful analysis
of import and margin trends.
10. The impact of the Section 201 tariffs
on steel product imports.
11. The significance of declining
margins and steady (or rising) imports
[FR Doc. E7–12435 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Patent Term Extension
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0020 comment’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: 571–272–0112, marked to the
attention of Susan Fawcett.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Customer Information Services
Group, Public Information Services
Division, U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Robert A. Clarke,
Deputy Director, Office of Patent Legal
Administration, U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by
telephone at 571–272–7735; or by e-mail
at Robert.Clarke@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Abstract
The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
Act at 35 U.S.C. 156 permits the United
States Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) to restore the patent term lost
due to certain types of regulatory review
by the Federal Food and Drug
Administration or the Department of
Agriculture. Only patents for drug
products, medical devices, food
additives, and color additives are
eligible for extension. The maximum
length that a patent may be extended in
order to restore the lost portion of the
patent term is five years.
The USPTO may in some cases extend
the term of an original patent due to
certain delays in the prosecution of the
patent application, including delays
caused by interference proceedings,
secrecy orders, or appellate review by
the Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences or a Federal court in
which the patent is issued pursuant to
a decision reversing an adverse
determination of patentability. The
patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C.
154(b), as amended by Title IV, Subtitle
D of the Intellectual Property and
Communications Omnibus Reform Act
of 1999, require the USPTO to notify the
applicant of the patent term adjustment
in the notice of allowance and give the
applicant an opportunity to request
reconsideration of the USPTO’s patent
term adjustment determination. The
USPTO may also reduce the amount of
patent term adjustment granted if delays
were caused by an applicant’s failure to
make a reasonable effort to respond
within three months of the mailing date
of a communication from the USPTO.
Applicants may petition for
reinstatement of a reduction in patent
term adjustment with a showing that, in
spite of all due care, the applicant was
unable to respond to a communication
from the USPTO within the three month
period.
The USPTO administers 35 U.S.C. 154
and 156 through 37 CFR 1.701–1.791.
These rules permit the public to submit
applications to the USPTO to extend the
term of a patent past its original
expiration date, to request interim
extensions and review of final eligibility
decisions, and to withdraw an
application requesting a patent term
extension after it is submitted. Under 35
U.S.C. 156(d), an application for patent
term extension must identify the
approved product, the patent to be
extended, the claims included in the
patent for the approved product, and a
method of use or manufacturing for the
approved product. In addition, the
application for patent term extension
must provide a brief description of the
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
35223
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 27, 2007 / Notices
activities undertaken by the applicant
during the regulatory review period
with respect to the approved product
and the significant dates of these
activities.
The term of a patent which claims a
product, a method of using a product, or
a method of manufacturing a product
shall be extended if the term of the
patent has not expired before an
application is submitted. The Federal
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act requires
that an application for patent term
extension be filed with the USPTO
within 60 days of the product receiving
regulatory approval from the Federal
Food and Drug Administration or the
Department of Agriculture. Under 35
U.S.C. 156(e), an interim extension may
be granted if the term of an eligible
patent for which an application for
patent term extension has been
submitted would expire before a
certificate of extension is issued.
The information in this collection is
used by the USPTO to consider whether
an applicant is eligible for a patent term
extension or reconsideration of a patent
term adjustment and, if so, to determine
the length of the patent term extension
or adjustment. There are no forms
associated with this collection.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to
the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0020.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits; not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
26,859 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public from one to 25 hours, depending
on the complexity of the situation, to
gather the necessary information,
prepare the appropriate documents, and
submit the applications, requests, and
petitions included in this collection.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 30,905 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $9,395,120. The USPTO
expects that the information in this
collection will be prepared by attorneys.
Using the professional rate of $304 per
hour for associate attorneys in private
firms, the USPTO estimates that the
respondent cost burden for submitting
the information in this collection will be
$9,395,120 per year.
Estimated
time for
response
(in hours)
Item
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
annual
burden hours
Application to Extend Patent Term under 35 U.S.C. 156 ...........................................................
Request for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2) ..........................................................
Petition to Review Final Eligibility Decision under 37 CFR 1.750 ..............................................
Initial Application for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(d)(5) ............................................
Subsequent Application for Interim Extension under 37 CFR 1.790 ..........................................
Response to Requirement to Elect .............................................................................................
Response to Request to Identify Holder of Patent Term ............................................................
Declaration to Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term .................................................
Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment Determination ....................................
Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment ...............................................
Petition to Accord a Filing Date to an Application under 37 CFR 1.740 for Extension of a Patent Term ...................................................................................................................................
25
1
25
20
1
1
2
2
1
2
50
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
24,000
2,800
1,250
1
25
20
1
2
2
2
24,000
5,600
2
1
2
Total ......................................................................................................................................
........................
26,859
30,905
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $5,988,052.
There are no capital start-up,
maintenance, or recordkeeping costs
associated with this information
collection. However, this collection
does have annual (non-hour) costs in
the form of filing fees and postage costs.
This collection has filing fees
associated with the requirements for
patent term extension and patent term
adjustment. The USPTO estimates that
the total filing costs associated with this
collection will be $5,977,040 per year.
Estimated
annual
responses
Item
Fee amount
Estimated
annual
filing costs
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Application to Extend Patent Term under 35 U.S.C. 156 ...........................................................
Request for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2) ..........................................................
Petition to Review Final Eligibility Decision under 37 CFR 1.750 ..............................................
Initial Application for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(d)(5) ............................................
Subsequent Application for Interim Extension under 37 CFR 1.790 ..........................................
Response to Requirement to Elect .............................................................................................
Response to Request to Identify Holder of Patent Term ............................................................
Declaration to Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term .................................................
Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment Determination ....................................
Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment ...............................................
Petition to Accord a Filing Date to an Application under 37 CFR 1.740 for Extension of a Patent Term ...................................................................................................................................
50
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
24,000
2,800
$1,120
0
0
420
220
0
0
0
200
400
$56,000
0
0
420
220
0
0
0
4,800,000
1,120,000
1
400
400
Total ......................................................................................................................................
26,859
........................
5,977,040.00
Customers may incur postage costs
when submitting the information in this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:50 Jun 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
collection to the USPTO by mail. The
USPTO estimates that the average first-
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
class postage cost for a mailed
submission will be 41 cents and that up
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
35224
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 27, 2007 / Notices
to 26,859 submissions will be mailed to
the USPTO per year. The total estimated
postage cost for this collection is
$11,012 per year.
The total non-hour respondent cost
burden for this collection in the form of
filing fees and postage costs is estimated
to be $5,988,052 per year.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, e.g., the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 20, 2007.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Customer Information
Services Group, Public Information Services
Division.
[FR Doc. E7–12410 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Chief of Engineers Environmental
Advisory Board
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers DoD.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463),
announcement is made of the following
committee meeting:
Name of Committee: Chief of
Engineers Environmental Advisory
Board (EAB).
Topic: The EAB will discuss national
considerations related to ecosystem
restoration through integrated water
resources management.
Date of Meeting: July 18, 2007.
Place: Hotel Palomar, 2121 P Street,
NW., Washington, DC.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:50 Jun 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
Time: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Thirty minutes will be set aside for
public comment. Members of the public
who wish to speak must register prior to
the start of the meeting. Registration
will begin at 8:30. Statements are
limited to 3 minutes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Rennie Sherman, Executive Secretary,
rennie.h.sherman@usace.army.mil (202)
761–7771.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EAB
advises the Chief of Engineers by
providing expert and independent
advice on environmental issues facing
the Corps of Engineers. The public
meeting will include presentations by
the EAB as well as by Corps staff. The
meeting is open to the public, and
public comment is tentatively
scheduled for 30 minutes beginning at
11:15. Written statements may be
submitted prior to the meeting or up to
30 days after the meeting to Ms.
Sherman at
rennie.h.sherman@usace.army.mil.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07–3152 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–92–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Inland Waterways Users Board
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), announcement is
made of the forthcoming meeting.
Name of Committee: Inland
Waterways Users Board (Board).
Date: July 31, 2007.
Location: Holiday Inn LouisvilleDowntown, 120 West Broadway,
Louisville, KY 40202, (502) 582–2241.
Time: Registration will begin at 8:30
a.m. and the meeting is scheduled to
adjourn at 1 p.m.
Agenda: The Board will hear briefings
on the status of both the funding for
inland navigation projects and studies,
and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund,
and be provided updates of various
inland waterways projects.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mark R. Pointon, Headquarters, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, CECW–CO,
441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC
20314–1000; Ph: (202) 761–4258.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public. Any
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interested person may attend, appear
before, or file statements with the
committee at the time and in the
manner permitted by the committee.
Brenda S. Bown,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07–3151 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–92–M
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
Department of Education.
Notice of proposed information
collection requests.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management, invites
comments on the proposed information
collection requests as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: An emergency review has been
requested in accordance with the Act
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 3507 (j)), since
public harm is reasonably likely to
result if normal clearance procedures
are followed. Approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
been requested by July 3, 2007. A
regular clearance process is also
beginning. Interested persons are
invited to submit comments on or before
August 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the emergency review should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Nicole Cafarella, Desk
Officer, Department of Education, Office
of Management and Budget; 725 17th
Street, NW., Room 10222, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503 or faxed to (202) 395–6974.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Director of OMB provide
interested Federal agencies and the
public an early opportunity to comment
on information collection requests. The
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) may amend or waive the
requirement for public consultation to
the extent that public participation in
the approval process would defeat the
purpose of the information collection,
violate State or Federal law, or
substantially interfere with any agency’s
ability to perform its statutory
obligations. The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management,
publishes this notice containing
proposed information collection
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35222-35224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12410]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Patent Term Extension
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 27, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-0020
comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: 571-272-0112, marked to the attention of Susan
Fawcett.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, Customer Information Services Group, Public
Information Services Division, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O.
Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Robert A. Clarke, Deputy Director, Office of
Patent Legal Administration, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-7735; or by e-
mail at Robert.Clarke@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act at 35 U.S.C. 156 permits
the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to restore the
patent term lost due to certain types of regulatory review by the
Federal Food and Drug Administration or the Department of Agriculture.
Only patents for drug products, medical devices, food additives, and
color additives are eligible for extension. The maximum length that a
patent may be extended in order to restore the lost portion of the
patent term is five years.
The USPTO may in some cases extend the term of an original patent
due to certain delays in the prosecution of the patent application,
including delays caused by interference proceedings, secrecy orders, or
appellate review by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or a
Federal court in which the patent is issued pursuant to a decision
reversing an adverse determination of patentability. The patent term
provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b), as amended by Title IV, Subtitle D of
the Intellectual Property and Communications Omnibus Reform Act of
1999, require the USPTO to notify the applicant of the patent term
adjustment in the notice of allowance and give the applicant an
opportunity to request reconsideration of the USPTO's patent term
adjustment determination. The USPTO may also reduce the amount of
patent term adjustment granted if delays were caused by an applicant's
failure to make a reasonable effort to respond within three months of
the mailing date of a communication from the USPTO. Applicants may
petition for reinstatement of a reduction in patent term adjustment
with a showing that, in spite of all due care, the applicant was unable
to respond to a communication from the USPTO within the three month
period.
The USPTO administers 35 U.S.C. 154 and 156 through 37 CFR 1.701-
1.791. These rules permit the public to submit applications to the
USPTO to extend the term of a patent past its original expiration date,
to request interim extensions and review of final eligibility
decisions, and to withdraw an application requesting a patent term
extension after it is submitted. Under 35 U.S.C. 156(d), an application
for patent term extension must identify the approved product, the
patent to be extended, the claims included in the patent for the
approved product, and a method of use or manufacturing for the approved
product. In addition, the application for patent term extension must
provide a brief description of the
[[Page 35223]]
activities undertaken by the applicant during the regulatory review
period with respect to the approved product and the significant dates
of these activities.
The term of a patent which claims a product, a method of using a
product, or a method of manufacturing a product shall be extended if
the term of the patent has not expired before an application is
submitted. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act requires that an
application for patent term extension be filed with the USPTO within 60
days of the product receiving regulatory approval from the Federal Food
and Drug Administration or the Department of Agriculture. Under 35
U.S.C. 156(e), an interim extension may be granted if the term of an
eligible patent for which an application for patent term extension has
been submitted would expire before a certificate of extension is
issued.
The information in this collection is used by the USPTO to consider
whether an applicant is eligible for a patent term extension or
reconsideration of a patent term adjustment and, if so, to determine
the length of the patent term extension or adjustment. There are no
forms associated with this collection.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0020.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profits; not-for-profit
institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 26,859 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
the public from one to 25 hours, depending on the complexity of the
situation, to gather the necessary information, prepare the appropriate
documents, and submit the applications, requests, and petitions
included in this collection.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 30,905 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $9,395,120. The
USPTO expects that the information in this collection will be prepared
by attorneys. Using the professional rate of $304 per hour for
associate attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates that the
respondent cost burden for submitting the information in this
collection will be $9,395,120 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated time Estimated Estimated
Item for response annual annual burden
(in hours) responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application to Extend Patent Term under 35 U.S.C. 156........... 25 50 1,250
Request for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2)......... 1 1 1
Petition to Review Final Eligibility Decision under 37 CFR 1.750 25 1 25
Initial Application for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 20 1 20
156(d)(5)......................................................
Subsequent Application for Interim Extension under 37 CFR 1.790. 1 1 1
Response to Requirement to Elect................................ 1 2 2
Response to Request to Identify Holder of Patent Term........... 2 1 2
Declaration to Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term.... 2 1 2
Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment 1 24,000 24,000
Determination..................................................
Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment.... 2 2,800 5,600
Petition to Accord a Filing Date to an Application under 37 CFR 2 1 2
1.740 for Extension of a Patent Term...........................
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... .............. 26,859 30,905
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $5,988,052.
There are no capital start-up, maintenance, or recordkeeping costs
associated with this information collection. However, this collection
does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of filing fees and
postage costs.
This collection has filing fees associated with the requirements
for patent term extension and patent term adjustment. The USPTO
estimates that the total filing costs associated with this collection
will be $5,977,040 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Item annual Fee amount annual filing
responses costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application to Extend Patent Term under 35 U.S.C. 156........... 50 $1,120 $56,000
Request for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2)......... 1 0 0
Petition to Review Final Eligibility Decision under 37 CFR 1.750 1 0 0
Initial Application for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 1 420 420
156(d)(5)......................................................
Subsequent Application for Interim Extension under 37 CFR 1.790. 1 220 220
Response to Requirement to Elect................................ 2 0 0
Response to Request to Identify Holder of Patent Term........... 1 0 0
Declaration to Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term.... 1 0 0
Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment 24,000 200 4,800,000
Determination..................................................
Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment.... 2,800 400 1,120,000
Petition to Accord a Filing Date to an Application under 37 CFR 1 400 400
1.740 for Extension of a Patent Term...........................
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 26,859 .............. 5,977,040.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customers may incur postage costs when submitting the information
in this collection to the USPTO by mail. The USPTO estimates that the
average first-class postage cost for a mailed submission will be 41
cents and that up
[[Page 35224]]
to 26,859 submissions will be mailed to the USPTO per year. The total
estimated postage cost for this collection is $11,012 per year.
The total non-hour respondent cost burden for this collection in
the form of filing fees and postage costs is estimated to be $5,988,052
per year.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: June 20, 2007.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer,
Customer Information Services Group, Public Information Services
Division.
[FR Doc. E7-12410 Filed 6-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P