Patent Term Extension, 35222-35224 [E7-12410]

Download as PDF 35222 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 27, 2007 / Notices lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to liquidate without regard to dumping duties entries of the subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after November 29, 2006 (the effective date of this revocation), and to discontinue collection of cash deposits of antidumping duties for entries of subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after November 29, 2006. This notice serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary material disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This sunset review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 20, 2007. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Appendix - Issues in Decision Memorandum 1. Whether ‘‘other factors’’ require that the Department consider two recent World Trade Organization (‘‘WTO’’) determinations with respect to zeroing 2. Whether the Department’s conclusion in the April 9, 2007, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Section 129 Determinations’’ (‘‘Final Section 129 Determination’’) to revoke the order undermines the validity of Preliminary Results 3. Whether the Department’s implementation in ‘‘Final Section 129 Determination’’ of WTO rulings pertaining to zeroing undermines the validity of Preliminary Results 4. Whether the recalculated weighted– average margin of zero percent for Corus Staal in ‘‘Final Section 129 Determination’’ undermines the ‘‘likely margin to prevail’’ if the order were revoked that was referenced in Preliminary Results 5. Whether the Department may rely on the presumptions embodied in Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five–year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871, 18872 (April 16, 1998) (‘‘Sunset Review Policy Bulletin’’) VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:40 Jun 26, 2007 Jkt 211001 6. Whether the Department’s decision in ‘‘Final Section 129 Determination’’ to revoke the order means that Corus Staal will not dump in the future 7. Whether Sunset Review Policy Bulletin presupposes a validly issued order and would not apply in the absence of a validly issued order 8. Whether the Department may rely on margins calculated in administrative reviews based on zeroing 9. Whether domestic producers’ withdrawals of administrative review requests prevented meaningful analysis of import and margin trends. 10. The impact of the Section 201 tariffs on steel product imports. 11. The significance of declining margins and steady (or rising) imports [FR Doc. E7–12435 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Patent and Trademark Office Patent Term Extension ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– 13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 27, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0020 comment’’ in the subject line of the message. • Fax: 571–272–0112, marked to the attention of Susan Fawcett. • Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Customer Information Services Group, Public Information Services Division, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information should be directed to Robert A. Clarke, Deputy Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by telephone at 571–272–7735; or by e-mail at Robert.Clarke@uspto.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 I. Abstract The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act at 35 U.S.C. 156 permits the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to restore the patent term lost due to certain types of regulatory review by the Federal Food and Drug Administration or the Department of Agriculture. Only patents for drug products, medical devices, food additives, and color additives are eligible for extension. The maximum length that a patent may be extended in order to restore the lost portion of the patent term is five years. The USPTO may in some cases extend the term of an original patent due to certain delays in the prosecution of the patent application, including delays caused by interference proceedings, secrecy orders, or appellate review by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or a Federal court in which the patent is issued pursuant to a decision reversing an adverse determination of patentability. The patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b), as amended by Title IV, Subtitle D of the Intellectual Property and Communications Omnibus Reform Act of 1999, require the USPTO to notify the applicant of the patent term adjustment in the notice of allowance and give the applicant an opportunity to request reconsideration of the USPTO’s patent term adjustment determination. The USPTO may also reduce the amount of patent term adjustment granted if delays were caused by an applicant’s failure to make a reasonable effort to respond within three months of the mailing date of a communication from the USPTO. Applicants may petition for reinstatement of a reduction in patent term adjustment with a showing that, in spite of all due care, the applicant was unable to respond to a communication from the USPTO within the three month period. The USPTO administers 35 U.S.C. 154 and 156 through 37 CFR 1.701–1.791. These rules permit the public to submit applications to the USPTO to extend the term of a patent past its original expiration date, to request interim extensions and review of final eligibility decisions, and to withdraw an application requesting a patent term extension after it is submitted. Under 35 U.S.C. 156(d), an application for patent term extension must identify the approved product, the patent to be extended, the claims included in the patent for the approved product, and a method of use or manufacturing for the approved product. In addition, the application for patent term extension must provide a brief description of the E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1 35223 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 27, 2007 / Notices activities undertaken by the applicant during the regulatory review period with respect to the approved product and the significant dates of these activities. The term of a patent which claims a product, a method of using a product, or a method of manufacturing a product shall be extended if the term of the patent has not expired before an application is submitted. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act requires that an application for patent term extension be filed with the USPTO within 60 days of the product receiving regulatory approval from the Federal Food and Drug Administration or the Department of Agriculture. Under 35 U.S.C. 156(e), an interim extension may be granted if the term of an eligible patent for which an application for patent term extension has been submitted would expire before a certificate of extension is issued. The information in this collection is used by the USPTO to consider whether an applicant is eligible for a patent term extension or reconsideration of a patent term adjustment and, if so, to determine the length of the patent term extension or adjustment. There are no forms associated with this collection. II. Method of Collection By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to the USPTO. III. Data OMB Number: 0651–0020. Form Number(s): None. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection. Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profits; not-for-profit institutions. Estimated Number of Respondents: 26,859 responses per year. Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take the public from one to 25 hours, depending on the complexity of the situation, to gather the necessary information, prepare the appropriate documents, and submit the applications, requests, and petitions included in this collection. Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 30,905 hours. Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $9,395,120. The USPTO expects that the information in this collection will be prepared by attorneys. Using the professional rate of $304 per hour for associate attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates that the respondent cost burden for submitting the information in this collection will be $9,395,120 per year. Estimated time for response (in hours) Item Estimated annual responses Estimated annual burden hours Application to Extend Patent Term under 35 U.S.C. 156 ........................................................... Request for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2) .......................................................... Petition to Review Final Eligibility Decision under 37 CFR 1.750 .............................................. Initial Application for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(d)(5) ............................................ Subsequent Application for Interim Extension under 37 CFR 1.790 .......................................... Response to Requirement to Elect ............................................................................................. Response to Request to Identify Holder of Patent Term ............................................................ Declaration to Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term ................................................. Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment Determination .................................... Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment ............................................... Petition to Accord a Filing Date to an Application under 37 CFR 1.740 for Extension of a Patent Term ................................................................................................................................... 25 1 25 20 1 1 2 2 1 2 50 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 24,000 2,800 1,250 1 25 20 1 2 2 2 24,000 5,600 2 1 2 Total ...................................................................................................................................... ........................ 26,859 30,905 Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $5,988,052. There are no capital start-up, maintenance, or recordkeeping costs associated with this information collection. However, this collection does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of filing fees and postage costs. This collection has filing fees associated with the requirements for patent term extension and patent term adjustment. The USPTO estimates that the total filing costs associated with this collection will be $5,977,040 per year. Estimated annual responses Item Fee amount Estimated annual filing costs jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Application to Extend Patent Term under 35 U.S.C. 156 ........................................................... Request for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2) .......................................................... Petition to Review Final Eligibility Decision under 37 CFR 1.750 .............................................. Initial Application for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(d)(5) ............................................ Subsequent Application for Interim Extension under 37 CFR 1.790 .......................................... Response to Requirement to Elect ............................................................................................. Response to Request to Identify Holder of Patent Term ............................................................ Declaration to Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term ................................................. Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment Determination .................................... Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment ............................................... Petition to Accord a Filing Date to an Application under 37 CFR 1.740 for Extension of a Patent Term ................................................................................................................................... 50 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 24,000 2,800 $1,120 0 0 420 220 0 0 0 200 400 $56,000 0 0 420 220 0 0 0 4,800,000 1,120,000 1 400 400 Total ...................................................................................................................................... 26,859 ........................ 5,977,040.00 Customers may incur postage costs when submitting the information in this VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:50 Jun 26, 2007 Jkt 211001 collection to the USPTO by mail. The USPTO estimates that the average first- PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 class postage cost for a mailed submission will be 41 cents and that up E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1 35224 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 27, 2007 / Notices to 26,859 submissions will be mailed to the USPTO per year. The total estimated postage cost for this collection is $11,012 per year. The total non-hour respondent cost burden for this collection in the form of filing fees and postage costs is estimated to be $5,988,052 per year. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: June 20, 2007. Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Customer Information Services Group, Public Information Services Division. [FR Doc. E7–12410 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–16–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers Chief of Engineers Environmental Advisory Board Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers DoD. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), announcement is made of the following committee meeting: Name of Committee: Chief of Engineers Environmental Advisory Board (EAB). Topic: The EAB will discuss national considerations related to ecosystem restoration through integrated water resources management. Date of Meeting: July 18, 2007. Place: Hotel Palomar, 2121 P Street, NW., Washington, DC. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:50 Jun 26, 2007 Jkt 211001 Time: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. Thirty minutes will be set aside for public comment. Members of the public who wish to speak must register prior to the start of the meeting. Registration will begin at 8:30. Statements are limited to 3 minutes. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Rennie Sherman, Executive Secretary, rennie.h.sherman@usace.army.mil (202) 761–7771. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EAB advises the Chief of Engineers by providing expert and independent advice on environmental issues facing the Corps of Engineers. The public meeting will include presentations by the EAB as well as by Corps staff. The meeting is open to the public, and public comment is tentatively scheduled for 30 minutes beginning at 11:15. Written statements may be submitted prior to the meeting or up to 30 days after the meeting to Ms. Sherman at rennie.h.sherman@usace.army.mil. Brenda S. Bowen, Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 07–3152 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710–92–M DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers Inland Waterways Users Board Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), announcement is made of the forthcoming meeting. Name of Committee: Inland Waterways Users Board (Board). Date: July 31, 2007. Location: Holiday Inn LouisvilleDowntown, 120 West Broadway, Louisville, KY 40202, (502) 582–2241. Time: Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and the meeting is scheduled to adjourn at 1 p.m. Agenda: The Board will hear briefings on the status of both the funding for inland navigation projects and studies, and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund, and be provided updates of various inland waterways projects. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark R. Pointon, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW–CO, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20314–1000; Ph: (202) 761–4258. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Any PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee. Brenda S. Bown, Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 07–3151 Filed 6–26–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710–92–M DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests Department of Education. Notice of proposed information collection requests. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: An emergency review has been requested in accordance with the Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 3507 (j)), since public harm is reasonably likely to result if normal clearance procedures are followed. Approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has been requested by July 3, 2007. A regular clearance process is also beginning. Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before August 27, 2007. ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the emergency review should be addressed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Nicole Cafarella, Desk Officer, Department of Education, Office of Management and Budget; 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or faxed to (202) 395–6974. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Director of OMB provide interested Federal agencies and the public an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency’s ability to perform its statutory obligations. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes this notice containing proposed information collection E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35222-35224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office


Patent Term Extension

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part 
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on the continuing information collection, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 27, 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
     E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-0020 
comment'' in the subject line of the message.
     Fax: 571-272-0112, marked to the attention of Susan 
Fawcett.
     Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the 
Chief Information Officer, Customer Information Services Group, Public 
Information Services Division, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. 
Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information 
should be directed to Robert A. Clarke, Deputy Director, Office of 
Patent Legal Administration, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-7735; or by e-
mail at Robert.Clarke@uspto.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract

    The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act at 35 U.S.C. 156 permits 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to restore the 
patent term lost due to certain types of regulatory review by the 
Federal Food and Drug Administration or the Department of Agriculture. 
Only patents for drug products, medical devices, food additives, and 
color additives are eligible for extension. The maximum length that a 
patent may be extended in order to restore the lost portion of the 
patent term is five years.
    The USPTO may in some cases extend the term of an original patent 
due to certain delays in the prosecution of the patent application, 
including delays caused by interference proceedings, secrecy orders, or 
appellate review by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or a 
Federal court in which the patent is issued pursuant to a decision 
reversing an adverse determination of patentability. The patent term 
provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b), as amended by Title IV, Subtitle D of 
the Intellectual Property and Communications Omnibus Reform Act of 
1999, require the USPTO to notify the applicant of the patent term 
adjustment in the notice of allowance and give the applicant an 
opportunity to request reconsideration of the USPTO's patent term 
adjustment determination. The USPTO may also reduce the amount of 
patent term adjustment granted if delays were caused by an applicant's 
failure to make a reasonable effort to respond within three months of 
the mailing date of a communication from the USPTO. Applicants may 
petition for reinstatement of a reduction in patent term adjustment 
with a showing that, in spite of all due care, the applicant was unable 
to respond to a communication from the USPTO within the three month 
period.
    The USPTO administers 35 U.S.C. 154 and 156 through 37 CFR 1.701-
1.791. These rules permit the public to submit applications to the 
USPTO to extend the term of a patent past its original expiration date, 
to request interim extensions and review of final eligibility 
decisions, and to withdraw an application requesting a patent term 
extension after it is submitted. Under 35 U.S.C. 156(d), an application 
for patent term extension must identify the approved product, the 
patent to be extended, the claims included in the patent for the 
approved product, and a method of use or manufacturing for the approved 
product. In addition, the application for patent term extension must 
provide a brief description of the

[[Page 35223]]

activities undertaken by the applicant during the regulatory review 
period with respect to the approved product and the significant dates 
of these activities.
    The term of a patent which claims a product, a method of using a 
product, or a method of manufacturing a product shall be extended if 
the term of the patent has not expired before an application is 
submitted. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act requires that an 
application for patent term extension be filed with the USPTO within 60 
days of the product receiving regulatory approval from the Federal Food 
and Drug Administration or the Department of Agriculture. Under 35 
U.S.C. 156(e), an interim extension may be granted if the term of an 
eligible patent for which an application for patent term extension has 
been submitted would expire before a certificate of extension is 
issued.
    The information in this collection is used by the USPTO to consider 
whether an applicant is eligible for a patent term extension or 
reconsideration of a patent term adjustment and, if so, to determine 
the length of the patent term extension or adjustment. There are no 
forms associated with this collection.

II. Method of Collection

    By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to the USPTO.

III. Data

    OMB Number: 0651-0020.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profits; not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 26,859 responses per year.
    Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take 
the public from one to 25 hours, depending on the complexity of the 
situation, to gather the necessary information, prepare the appropriate 
documents, and submit the applications, requests, and petitions 
included in this collection.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 30,905 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $9,395,120. The 
USPTO expects that the information in this collection will be prepared 
by attorneys. Using the professional rate of $304 per hour for 
associate attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates that the 
respondent cost burden for submitting the information in this 
collection will be $9,395,120 per year.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Estimated time     Estimated       Estimated
                              Item                                 for response       annual       annual burden
                                                                    (in hours)       responses         hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application to Extend Patent Term under 35 U.S.C. 156...........              25              50           1,250
Request for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2).........               1               1               1
Petition to Review Final Eligibility Decision under 37 CFR 1.750              25               1              25
Initial Application for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C.                     20               1              20
 156(d)(5)......................................................
Subsequent Application for Interim Extension under 37 CFR 1.790.               1               1               1
Response to Requirement to Elect................................               1               2               2
Response to Request to Identify Holder of Patent Term...........               2               1               2
Declaration to Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term....               2               1               2
Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment                         1          24,000          24,000
 Determination..................................................
Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment....               2           2,800           5,600
Petition to Accord a Filing Date to an Application under 37 CFR                2               1               2
 1.740 for Extension of a Patent Term...........................
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................................  ..............          26,859          30,905
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $5,988,052. 
There are no capital start-up, maintenance, or recordkeeping costs 
associated with this information collection. However, this collection 
does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of filing fees and 
postage costs.
    This collection has filing fees associated with the requirements 
for patent term extension and patent term adjustment. The USPTO 
estimates that the total filing costs associated with this collection 
will be $5,977,040 per year.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Estimated                       Estimated
                              Item                                    annual        Fee amount     annual filing
                                                                     responses                         costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application to Extend Patent Term under 35 U.S.C. 156...........              50          $1,120         $56,000
Request for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C. 156(e)(2).........               1               0               0
Petition to Review Final Eligibility Decision under 37 CFR 1.750               1               0               0
Initial Application for Interim Extension under 35 U.S.C.                      1             420             420
 156(d)(5)......................................................
Subsequent Application for Interim Extension under 37 CFR 1.790.               1             220             220
Response to Requirement to Elect................................               2               0               0
Response to Request to Identify Holder of Patent Term...........               1               0               0
Declaration to Withdraw an Application to Extend Patent Term....               1               0               0
Petition for Reconsideration of Patent Term Adjustment                    24,000             200       4,800,000
 Determination..................................................
Petition for Reinstatement of Reduced Patent Term Adjustment....           2,800             400       1,120,000
Petition to Accord a Filing Date to an Application under 37 CFR                1             400             400
 1.740 for Extension of a Patent Term...........................
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................................          26,859  ..............    5,977,040.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Customers may incur postage costs when submitting the information 
in this collection to the USPTO by mail. The USPTO estimates that the 
average first-class postage cost for a mailed submission will be 41 
cents and that up

[[Page 35224]]

to 26,859 submissions will be mailed to the USPTO per year. The total 
estimated postage cost for this collection is $11,012 per year.
    The total non-hour respondent cost burden for this collection in 
the form of filing fees and postage costs is estimated to be $5,988,052 
per year.

IV. Request for Comments

    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden 
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; 
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or 
included in the request for OMB approval of this information 
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.

    Dated: June 20, 2007.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer, 
Customer Information Services Group, Public Information Services 
Division.
[FR Doc. E7-12410 Filed 6-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.