Safety Zone; Fundation Amistad Fireworks, East Hampton, NY, 35013-35015 [E7-12289]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
30h (‘‘other (specify)’’), with the words
‘‘bills inserted in EGDs’’ in the space
immediately following ‘‘(specify)’’. The
redemptions of tickets are reported as
cash out transactions in item 31a
(‘‘redemptions of casino chips, tokens
and other gaming instruments’’).
Casinos may continue to use the current
version of Form 103 if they complete it
in accordance with this guidance.
However, FinCEN is posting on its
website a revised copy of Form 103 with
minor editorial changes to reflect this
guidance along with updated
instructions to reflect the exemptions
contained in § 103.22(b)(2)(iii) in this
final rule.
VI. Executive Order 12866
The Department of the Treasury has
determined that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
since the regulatory reporting threshold
excludes casinos whose gross annual
gaming revenues do not exceed $1
million. In addition, the final rule
exempts previously reportable
transactions, such as jackpots from slot
machines and video lottery terminals, as
well as cash out transactions involving
certain money plays, from the final
rule’s reporting obligations.
VIII. Effective Date
This rule is being made effective
without a delayed effective date in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 103
Administrative practice and
procedure, Authority delegations
(government agencies), Banks and
banking, Currency, Gambling, Indian
gaming, Investigations, Law
enforcement, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, part 103 of title 31 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is hereby
amended as follows:
I
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
PART 103—FINANCIAL
RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
OF CURRENCY AND FINANCIAL
TRANSACTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 103
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951–1959;
31 U.S.C. 5311–5314, 5316–5332; title III,
secs. 311, 312, 313, 314, 319, 326, 352, Pub.
L. 107–56, 115 Stat. 307.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Jun 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
2. Section 103.22 is amended by:
A. Revising paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(A),
(E), (G), and (H), and adding a new
paragraph (b)(2)(i)(I);
I B. Revising paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(A),
(E), (F), (H), and (I), and adding a new
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(J); and
I C. Adding a new paragraph (b)(2)(iii).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
I
I
§ 103.22 Reports of transactions in
currency.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Purchases of chips, tokens, and
other gaming instruments; * * *
(E) Bets of currency, including money
plays; * * *
(G) Purchases of a casino’s check;
(H) Exchanges of currency for
currency, including foreign currency;
and
(I) Bills inserted into electronic
gaming devices.
(ii) * * *
(A) Redemptions of chips, tokens,
tickets, and other gaming instruments;
* * *
(E) Payments on bets;
(F) Payments by a casino to a
customer based on receipt of funds
through wire transfers; * * *
(H) Exchanges of currency for
currency, including foreign currency;
(I) Travel and complimentary
expenses and gaming incentives; and
(J) Payment for tournament, contests,
and other promotions.
(iii) Other provisions of this part
notwithstanding, casinos are exempted
from the reporting obligations found in
§§ 103.22(b)(2) and (c)(3) for the
following transactions in currency or
currency transactions:
(A) Transactions between a casino
and a currency dealer or exchanger, or
between a casino and a check casher, as
those terms are defined in § 103.11(uu),
so long as such transactions are
conducted pursuant to a contractual or
other arrangement with a casino
covering the financial services in
§§ 103.22(b)(2)(i)(H), 103.22(b)(2)(ii)(G),
and 103.22(b)(2)(ii)(H);
(B) Cash out transactions to the extent
the currency is won in a money play
and is the same currency the customer
wagered in the money play, or cash in
transactions to the extent the currency
is the same currency the customer
previously wagered in a money play on
the same table game without leaving the
table;
(C) Bills inserted into electronic
gaming devices in multiple transactions
(unless a casino has knowledge
35013
pursuant to § 103.22(c)(3) in which case
this exemption would not apply); and
(D) Jackpots from slot machines or
video lottery terminals.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 20, 2007.
James H. Freis, Jr.,
Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network.
[FR Doc. E7–12332 Filed 6–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–02–P
*
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01–07–079]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fundation Amistad
Fireworks, East Hampton, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Fundation Amistad Fireworks in
East Hampton, NY. The safety zone is
necessary to protect the life and
property of the maritime community
from the hazards posed by the fireworks
display. Entry into or movement within
this safety zone during the enforcement
period is prohibited without approval of
the Captain of the Port, Long Island
Sound.
This rule is effective from 8:30
p.m. on July 14, 2007 until 10:30 p.m.
on July 15, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CGD01–07–
079 and will be available for inspection
or copying at Sector Long Island Sound,
New Haven, CT, between 9 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant D. Miller, Chief, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard
Sector Long Island Sound at (203) 468–
4596.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The Coast
Guard did not receive an Application
for Approval of Marine Event for this
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
35014
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
event with sufficient time to implement
a NPRM, thereby making an NPRM
impracticable. A delay or cancellation of
the fireworks display in order to
accommodate a full notice and comment
period would be contrary to the pubic
interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Any delay encountered in this
regulation’s effective date would be
impracticable and contrary to public
interest since immediate action is
needed to prevent traffic from transiting
a portion of Three Mile Harbor off East
Hampton, NY and to protect the
maritime public from the hazards
associated with this fireworks event.
The temporary zone should have
minimal negative impact on the public
and navigation because it will only be
enforced for a two hour period on only
one of two specified days. In addition,
the area closed by the safety zone is
minimal, allowing vessels to transit
around the zone in Three Mile Harbor
off East Hampton, NY.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Background and Purpose
The Fundation Amistad Fireworks
display will be taking place in Three
Mile Harbor off East Hampton, NY from
8:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on July 14, 2007.
If the fireworks display is cancelled due
to inclement weather on July 14, 2007,
it will take place during the same hours
on July 15, 2007. This safety zone is
necessary to protect the life and
property of the maritime public from the
hazards posed by the fireworks display.
It will protect the maritime public by
prohibiting entry into or movement
within this portion of Three Mile Harbor
one hour prior to, during and one hour
after the stated event.
Discussion of Rule
This regulation establishes a
temporary safety zone on the navigable
waters of Three Mile Harbor off East
Hampton, NY within an 800–foot radius
of the fireworks barge located at
approximate position 41°1′5″ N,
072°11′55″ W. The temporary safety
zone will be outlined by temporary
marker buoys installed by the event
organizers.
This action is intended to prohibit
vessel traffic in a portion of Three Mile
Harbor off East Hampton, NY to provide
for the protection of life and property of
the maritime public. The safety zone
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. until
11:30 p.m. on July 14, 2007. Marine
traffic may transit safely outside of the
safety zone during the event thereby
allowing navigation of the rest of Three
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Jun 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
Mile Harbor except for the portion
delineated by this rule.
The Captain of the Port anticipates
minimal negative impact on vessel
traffic due to this event due to the
limited area and duration covered by
this safety zone. Public notifications
will be made prior to the effective
period via local notice to mariners and
marine information broadcasts.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
This regulation may have some
impact on the public, but the potential
impact will be minimized for the
following reasons: Vessels will only be
excluded from the area of the safety
zone for 3 hours; and vessels will be
able to operate in other areas of Three
Mile Harbor off East Hampton, NY
during the enforcement period.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
those portions of Three Mile Harbor off
East Hampton, NY covered by the safety
zone. For the reasons outlined in the
Regulatory Evaluation section above,
this rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Assistance for Small Entities
Under subsection 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 [Pub. L. 104–121],
the Coast Guard wants to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so
that they can better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking. If this rule will affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call
Lieutenant D. Miller, Chief, Waterways
Management Division, Sector Long
Island Sound, at (203) 468–4596.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 26, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
will not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it will not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:37 Jun 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of the categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
falls under the provisions of paragraph
(34)(g) because the rule establishes a
safety zone.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226 and 1231; 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T01–079 to
read as follows:
I
§ 165.T01–079
Safety Zone: Fundation
Amistad Fireworks, East Hampton, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of
Three Mile Harbor off of East Hampton,
NY within an 800-foot radius of the
fireworks barge located in approximate
position 41°1′5″ N, 072°11′55″ W.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35015
Designated on-scene patrol personnel,
means any commissioned, warrant and
petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard
operating Coast Guard vessels in the
enforcement of this safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23
apply.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into or movement within this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound
or his designated on-scene patrol
personnel.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the Coast Guard Captain of
the Port or designated on-scene patrol
personnel.
(4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing
light or other means, the operator of the
vessel shall proceed as directed.
(5) Persons and vessels may request
permission to enter the zone on VHF–
16 or via phone at (203) 468–4401.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 10:30
p.m. on Saturday, July 14, 2007 and if
the fireworks display is postponed, from
8:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on Sunday, July
15, 2007.
Dated: June 15, 2007.
D.A. Ronan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Long Island Sound.
[FR Doc. E7–12289 Filed 6–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2007–0110; FRL–8330–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Idaho and
Washington; Interstate Transport of
Pollution
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving the actions
of the Idaho Department of
Environmental Quality (IDEQ) and the
Washington State Department of
Ecology (Ecology) to address the
provisions of Clean Air Act section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 8-hour ozone and
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). These provisions
require each state to submit a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision that
prohibits emissions that adversely affect
another state’s air quality through
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 26, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35013-35015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-12289]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01-07-079]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fundation Amistad Fireworks, East Hampton, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Fundation Amistad Fireworks in East Hampton, NY. The safety zone is
necessary to protect the life and property of the maritime community
from the hazards posed by the fireworks display. Entry into or movement
within this safety zone during the enforcement period is prohibited
without approval of the Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. on July 14, 2007 until
10:30 p.m. on July 15, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket CGD01-07-079 and will be available for
inspection or copying at Sector Long Island Sound, New Haven, CT,
between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant D. Miller, Chief, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard Sector Long Island Sound at (203) 468-
4596.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The Coast Guard did not
receive an Application for Approval of Marine Event for this
[[Page 35014]]
event with sufficient time to implement a NPRM, thereby making an NPRM
impracticable. A delay or cancellation of the fireworks display in
order to accommodate a full notice and comment period would be contrary
to the pubic interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Any delay encountered in this
regulation's effective date would be impracticable and contrary to
public interest since immediate action is needed to prevent traffic
from transiting a portion of Three Mile Harbor off East Hampton, NY and
to protect the maritime public from the hazards associated with this
fireworks event.
The temporary zone should have minimal negative impact on the
public and navigation because it will only be enforced for a two hour
period on only one of two specified days. In addition, the area closed
by the safety zone is minimal, allowing vessels to transit around the
zone in Three Mile Harbor off East Hampton, NY.
Background and Purpose
The Fundation Amistad Fireworks display will be taking place in
Three Mile Harbor off East Hampton, NY from 8:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on
July 14, 2007. If the fireworks display is cancelled due to inclement
weather on July 14, 2007, it will take place during the same hours on
July 15, 2007. This safety zone is necessary to protect the life and
property of the maritime public from the hazards posed by the fireworks
display. It will protect the maritime public by prohibiting entry into
or movement within this portion of Three Mile Harbor one hour prior to,
during and one hour after the stated event.
Discussion of Rule
This regulation establishes a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of Three Mile Harbor off East Hampton, NY within an
800-foot radius of the fireworks barge located at approximate position
41[deg]1'5'' N, 072[deg]11'55'' W. The temporary safety zone will be
outlined by temporary marker buoys installed by the event organizers.
This action is intended to prohibit vessel traffic in a portion of
Three Mile Harbor off East Hampton, NY to provide for the protection of
life and property of the maritime public. The safety zone will be
enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 11:30 p.m. on July 14, 2007. Marine
traffic may transit safely outside of the safety zone during the event
thereby allowing navigation of the rest of Three Mile Harbor except for
the portion delineated by this rule.
The Captain of the Port anticipates minimal negative impact on
vessel traffic due to this event due to the limited area and duration
covered by this safety zone. Public notifications will be made prior to
the effective period via local notice to mariners and marine
information broadcasts.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
This regulation may have some impact on the public, but the
potential impact will be minimized for the following reasons: Vessels
will only be excluded from the area of the safety zone for 3 hours; and
vessels will be able to operate in other areas of Three Mile Harbor off
East Hampton, NY during the enforcement period.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in those portions of Three Mile Harbor off East
Hampton, NY covered by the safety zone. For the reasons outlined in the
Regulatory Evaluation section above, this rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under subsection 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 [Pub. L. 104-121], the Coast Guard
wants to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they
can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the
rulemaking. If this rule will affect your small business, organization,
or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please call Lieutenant D. Miller,
Chief, Waterways Management Division, Sector Long Island Sound, at
(203) 468-4596.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
[[Page 35015]]
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and will not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of the
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule falls under the provisions of paragraph
(34)(g) because the rule establishes a safety zone.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226 and 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T01-079 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-079 Safety Zone: Fundation Amistad Fireworks, East
Hampton, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of Three Mile Harbor off of East Hampton, NY within an 800-foot
radius of the fireworks barge located in approximate position
41[deg]1'5'' N, 072[deg]11'55'' W.
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
Designated on-scene patrol personnel, means any commissioned, warrant
and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard operating Coast Guard
vessels in the enforcement of this safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.23 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of
this part, entry into or movement within this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound or his
designated on-scene patrol personnel.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or designated on-scene patrol personnel.
(4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed
as directed.
(5) Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the zone on
VHF-16 or via phone at (203) 468-4401.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30
p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on Saturday, July 14, 2007 and if the fireworks
display is postponed, from 8:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on Sunday, July 15,
2007.
Dated: June 15, 2007.
D.A. Ronan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound.
[FR Doc. E7-12289 Filed 6-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P