Regional Water Management Plan for the Sacramento River Contractors, 33514-33515 [E7-11689]

Download as PDF 33514 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Notices The unpatented oil placer mining claim was validly located before February 24, 1920, and is currently producing gas. The mining claim was deemed null and void by operation of law because of the claimant’s failure to timely pay the maintenance fee required by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of August 10, 1993, Pub. L. No. 105– 240, § 116. The statutory forfeiture date was August 31, 1994. MW Petroleum has shown to the BLM’s satisfaction that its failure to pay the maintenance fee was inadvertent. In 1998, MW Petroleum Corporation and Apache Corporation merged into one company, known by the name Apache Corporation. Consequently, when issued, the lease will be issued to Apache Corporation. The lease will be effective August 31, 1994, the statutory date of abandonment of the mining claim. The BLM has not issued any other oil and gas lease affecting any of the lands covered by the abandoned oil placer mining claim. The prospective lessee has agreed to the noncompetitive oil and gas lease terms. The BLM has assigned serial number WYW 137447 to the proposed noncompetitive lease and will issue the lease thirty days after the publication date of this Federal Register notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775–6176. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The prospective lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. In addition, the prospective lessee has paid all back rental and royalties from September 1994, to the present. MW Petroleum Corporation has submitted production reports for the period from September 1994, to present. The production during this period was approximately 5,242 MCF of gas. The noncompetitive oil and gas lease will require rental at $5 per acre or fraction thereof per year and royalty at the rate of 121⁄2 percent. Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication. [FR Doc. E7–11619 Filed 6–15–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–22–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Bureau of Reclamation Regional Water Management Plan for the Sacramento River Contractors AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:19 Jun 15, 2007 Jkt 211001 ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: The Regional Water Management Plan for the Sacramento River Contractors (Regional Plan) is available for review. Participating Contractors include: • Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District • Meridian Farms Water Company • Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District • Sutter Mutual Water Company • Provident Irrigation District • Pelger Mutual Water Company • Princeton-Codora-Glenn Irrigation District • Natomas Central Mutual Water Company • Reclamation District No. 108 • Reclamation District No. 1004 Under the authority of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) developed and published the Regional Criteria for Evaluating Water Management Plans for the Sacramento River Contractors (Regional Criteria) in 2004. The development and implementation of the Regional Criteria for the Sacramento Valley was an alternative pilot program to the current Standard Criteria for Evaluating Water Management Plans (Standard Criteria), as stated in the Water Conservation Administrative Proposal dated March 20, 1997. If the Contracting Officer deems this pilot program to be unsuccessful, the Regional Criteria will be discontinued. All subsequent Plans would then be evaluated under the current Standard Criteria. The above entities have developed the Regional Plan, which Reclamation has evaluated and preliminarily determined to meet the requirements of the Regional Criteria. All public comments must be received by August 2, 2007. ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to Ms. Laurie Sharp, Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California, 95825, or contact Ms. Sharp at 916–978–5232 (TDD 978–5608), or e-mail at lsharp@mp.usbr.gov. DATES: To be placed on a mailing list for any subsequent information, please contact Ms. Laurie Sharp at the telephone number or e-mail address above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are inviting the public to comment on the preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of Regional Plan adequacy. In September 1995, the Department of the Interior (Interior) invited the public to identify any concerns they had regarding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 implementation of the CVPIA (Title XXXIV of Public Law 102–575). To that end, Interior circulated a draft Administrative Proposal on Water Conservation Criteria on May 13, 1996. One concern that came to light was the applicability of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in different regions. Some water users had argued that it is inappropriate to establish a single set of criteria for water conservation plans in the CVP service area due to regional variations. In response to this comment, Interior developed Regional Criteria. The Regional Criteria state that the following are excepted from the requirement to prepare a Plan using these Regional Criteria: • All contractors that receive only irrigation water from any Federal Reclamation project and deliver said water to less than 2,000 acres of land. • All contractors that receive less than an annual average of 2,000 acrefeet from any Federal Reclamation project. The Regional Plan contains the following information: 1. Description of the Region Covered by the Plan 2. Inventory of Water Resources 3. Identify Regional Water Measurement Program 4. Analyze Water Management Quantifiable Objectives (QOs) 5. Identify Actions to Implement and Achieve Proposed QOs 6. Establish Monitoring Program 7. Budget and Allocation of Regional Cost 8. Regional Plan Coordination 9. Five-Year Plan Revision Procedure Reclamation evaluated the Regional Plan based on the Regional Criteria. A copy of the Regional Plan will be available for review at Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific Regional Office located in Sacramento, California, and the Northern California Area Office located in Willows, California. Comments received in response to this notice will become part of the administrative record and are subject to public inspection. Our practice is to make comments, including names, home addresses, home phone numbers, and email addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their names and/or home addresses, etc., but if you would like us to consider withholding this information, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. In addition, you must present a rationale for withholding this information. This rationale must demonstrate that disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Notices invasion of privacy. Unsupported assertions will not meet this burden. In the absence of exceptional, documentable circumstances, this information will be released. We will always make submissions from organizations or businesses, or from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety. If you wish to review a copy of the Regional Plans, please contact Ms. Laurie Sharp to find the office nearest you. Dated: May 9, 2007. Richard J. Woodley, Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation. [FR Doc. E7–11689 Filed 6–15–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [AAG/A Order No. 019–2007] Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records United States Marshals Service, Department of Justice. ACTION: Notice of modified systems of records. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the United States Marshals Service (USMS), Department of Justice, is issuing public notice of its proposal to modify its systems of records. This notice publishes updates to those systems of records, last published in the Federal Register on November 8, 1999 (64 FR 60832–52), except as otherwise set forth below under the caption SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. DATES: Title 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and (11) provide that the public be given a 30day period in which to comment on routine uses. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which has oversight responsibility under the Act, requires a 40-day period in which to review the systems modifications. The public, OMB and Congress are invited to comment on the modifications to these systems. Please submit any comments by July 30, 2007. The proposed changes will be effective on that date, unless comments are received that result in a contrary determination. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Department of Justice (DOJ), ATTN: Mary E. Cahill, Management and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Washington, DC 20530 (Room 1400, NPB), facsimile number 202–307– 1853. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:19 Jun 15, 2007 Jkt 211001 Ed Bordley, Attorney-Advisor, USMS, at 202–307–8571. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Modifications to the USMS systems of records include: Updates to addresses for the systems locations and systems managers’ locations; corrections to office designations for systems locations and titles of systems managers; revisions to reduce redundancy and increase clarity; additions or changes to more accurately describe the systems’ categories of individuals, purposes, categories of records and record source categories; clarifications to existing routine uses; additions to the routine uses; updates to the retention and disposal sections; and additions to data elements omitted from previous notices. Specific changes for each USMS system of records notice are set forth below: USMS Badge & Credentials File, Justice/USM–001: The system location and system manager location address have been updated. The section on categories of individuals covered by the system has been changed. Routine uses have been added and the others revised. An element has been added under storage. Under record source categories, the category ‘‘individuals for whom the badges/credentials were made’’ was added. USMS Internal Affairs System, Justice/USM–002: The system location and system manager location address have been updated; the system manager’s designation has also been changed. The record categories designation was modified to reflect the change in the system manager’s designation. The categories of individuals and record source categories were expanded to be more specific. Routine uses have been added and the others revised. Special Deputation Files, Justice/ USM–004: The system location and system manager location address has been updated; the system manager’s designation has also been changed. The categories of individuals covered designation has been expanded to be more specific. Minor revisions were made to the categories of records. Routine uses have been added and the others revised. The record source categories subdivision has been revised to include individual applicants. USMS Prisoner Processing and Population Management/Prisoner Tracking System (PPM/PTS), Justice/ USM–005, last published in the Federal Register on April 28, 2004 (69 FR 23213): The system manager designation has been changed. New categories have been added to the categories of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 33515 individuals covered. Under routine uses, the markers have been changed from numeric to alpha characters to match the other system notices. Three routine uses were removed to eliminate redundancy; and one was added. The record source categories designation was revised to reflect the changes in the individual categories. USMS Training Files, Justice/USM– 006: The primary system location and system manager location address have been updated. The wording has been changed for the categories of individuals covered. Routine uses have been added and minor revisions made to others. The retention and disposal period has been corrected. Witness Security Files Information System, Justice/USM–008: The system location and system manager location address have been updated. The section on categories of individuals covered has been expanded to include potential witnesses and witnesses’ or potential witnesses’ families; the wording has also been changed. The categories of records has been revised to reflect the changes made in the categories of individuals. Routine uses have been added and one routine use has been removed. The retention and disposal category has been corrected; the record source categories have also been modified. Inappropriate Communications/ Threat Information System (IC/TIS), Justice/USM–009: The primary system location and system manager location address have been updated. Routine uses were added and minor revisions made to the others. The retention and disposal category has been corrected. The record source categories have been revised to include the threat or inappropriate communication initiator. Judicial Facility Security Index System, Justice/USM–010: The system location and system manager location address have been updated. ‘‘USMS facilities’’ has been added to the categories of individuals covered. Routine uses were added and minor revisions made to the others. ‘‘Contractor’’ has been added to the retrievability category. Judicial Protection Information System, Justice/USM–011: The system location and system manager location address have been updated. A ‘‘Decentralized Segment’’ has also been added under system location. Routine uses have been added and minor revisions made to the others. The record source category has been reworded. U. S. Marshals Service Administrative Proceedings, Claims, and Civil Litigation Files, Justice/USM–013: The system location and system manager location E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 116 (Monday, June 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33514-33515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11689]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Regional Water Management Plan for the Sacramento River 
Contractors

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Regional Water Management Plan for the Sacramento River 
Contractors (Regional Plan) is available for review. Participating 
Contractors include:
     Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District
     Meridian Farms Water Company
     Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District
     Sutter Mutual Water Company
     Provident Irrigation District
     Pelger Mutual Water Company
     Princeton-Codora-Glenn Irrigation District
     Natomas Central Mutual Water Company
     Reclamation District No. 108
     Reclamation District No. 1004
    Under the authority of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act 
of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau of 
Reclamation (Reclamation) developed and published the Regional Criteria 
for Evaluating Water Management Plans for the Sacramento River 
Contractors (Regional Criteria) in 2004. The development and 
implementation of the Regional Criteria for the Sacramento Valley was 
an alternative pilot program to the current Standard Criteria for 
Evaluating Water Management Plans (Standard Criteria), as stated in the 
Water Conservation Administrative Proposal dated March 20, 1997. If the 
Contracting Officer deems this pilot program to be unsuccessful, the 
Regional Criteria will be discontinued. All subsequent Plans would then 
be evaluated under the current Standard Criteria. The above entities 
have developed the Regional Plan, which Reclamation has evaluated and 
preliminarily determined to meet the requirements of the Regional 
Criteria.

DATES: All public comments must be received by August 2, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to Ms. Laurie Sharp, Bureau of 
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California, 95825, or 
contact Ms. Sharp at 916-978-5232 (TDD 978-5608), or e-mail at 
lsharp@mp.usbr.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To be placed on a mailing list for any 
subsequent information, please contact Ms. Laurie Sharp at the 
telephone number or e-mail address above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are inviting the public to comment on the 
preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of Regional Plan adequacy. In 
September 1995, the Department of the Interior (Interior) invited the 
public to identify any concerns they had regarding implementation of 
the CVPIA (Title XXXIV of Public Law 102-575). To that end, Interior 
circulated a draft Administrative Proposal on Water Conservation 
Criteria on May 13, 1996. One concern that came to light was the 
applicability of Best Management Practices (BMPs) in different regions. 
Some water users had argued that it is inappropriate to establish a 
single set of criteria for water conservation plans in the CVP service 
area due to regional variations. In response to this comment, Interior 
developed Regional Criteria. The Regional Criteria state that the 
following are excepted from the requirement to prepare a Plan using 
these Regional Criteria:
     All contractors that receive only irrigation water from 
any Federal Reclamation project and deliver said water to less than 
2,000 acres of land.
     All contractors that receive less than an annual average 
of 2,000 acre-feet from any Federal Reclamation project.
    The Regional Plan contains the following information:

1. Description of the Region Covered by the Plan
2. Inventory of Water Resources
3. Identify Regional Water Measurement Program
4. Analyze Water Management Quantifiable Objectives (QOs)
5. Identify Actions to Implement and Achieve Proposed QOs
6. Establish Monitoring Program
7. Budget and Allocation of Regional Cost
8. Regional Plan Coordination
9. Five-Year Plan Revision Procedure

    Reclamation evaluated the Regional Plan based on the Regional 
Criteria. A copy of the Regional Plan will be available for review at 
Reclamation's Mid-Pacific Regional Office located in Sacramento, 
California, and the Northern California Area Office located in Willows, 
California. Comments received in response to this notice will become 
part of the administrative record and are subject to public inspection. 
Our practice is to make comments, including names, home addresses, home 
phone numbers, and email addresses of respondents, available for public 
review. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their names 
and/or home addresses, etc., but if you would like us to consider 
withholding this information, you must state this prominently at the 
beginning of your comments. In addition, you must present a rationale 
for withholding this information. This rationale must demonstrate that 
disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted

[[Page 33515]]

invasion of privacy. Unsupported assertions will not meet this burden. 
In the absence of exceptional, documentable circumstances, this 
information will be released. We will always make submissions from 
organizations or businesses, or from individuals identifying themselves 
as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, 
available for public inspection in their entirety. If you wish to 
review a copy of the Regional Plans, please contact Ms. Laurie Sharp to 
find the office nearest you.

    Dated: May 9, 2007.
Richard J. Woodley,
Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. E7-11689 Filed 6-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.