Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on the Interstate 81 Corridor Improvement Study in Virginia, 33555-33556 [07-2984]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Notices
Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
President’s major disaster declaration on
06/07/2007, Private Non-Profit
organizations that provide essential
services of a governmental nature may
file disaster loan applications at the
address listed above or other locally
announced locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties:
Atoka, Beckham, Blaine, Caddo,
Comanche, Dewey, Ellis, Greer,
Kay, Kiowa, Lincoln, Noble,
Nowata, Okfuskee, Pottawatomie,
Roger Mills, Seminole.
The Interest Rates are:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Percent
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available
Elsewhere ...................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available
Elsewhere ...................................
4.000
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #10881 and #10882]
South Dakota Disaster Number SD–
00012
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Amendment 2.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of South Dakota
(FEMA–1702–DR), dated 05/22/2007.
Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes
and Flooding.
Incident Period: 05/04/2007 and
continuing through 06/08/2007.
EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/08/2007.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 07/23/2007.
EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:
02/22/2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
Jkt 211001
Study will be barred unless the claim is
filed on or before December 17, 2007. If
the Federal law that authorizes judicial
review of a claim provides a time period
of less that 180 days for filing such
claim, then that shorter time period still
applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John Simkins, I–81 Corridor
Environmental Project Manager, Federal
Highway Administration, 400 North 8th
Street, Suite 750, Richmond, Virginia
23219–4825; telephone: (804) 775–3342;
e-mail: John.Simkins@dot.gov. The
FHWA Virginia Division Office’s normal
business hours are 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
(eastern time). For the Virginia
Department of Transportation: Mr. Chris
Collins, Project Studies Manager,
Virginia Department of Transportation,
1401 East Broad Street, Richmond,
Virginia 23219; telephone (804) 225–
4249; e-mail:
CG.Collins@VirginiaDOT.org.
Notice is
hereby given that FHWA has issued a
Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact
Federal Highway Administration
Statement and Tier 1 Record of Decision
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions for the Interstate 81 Corridor
on the Interstate 81 Corridor
Improvement Study in Virginia.
Improvement Study in Virginia
Decisions in the Tier 1 Record of
Decision include the following:
AGENCY: Federal Highway
1. Improvement concept to be
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
advanced;
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
2. Advancing I–81 as a toll pilot
for Judicial Review of Actions by
facility under Section 1216(b) of the
FHWA.
Transportation Equity Act of the 21st
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions Century (TEA–21);
taken by the FHWA that are final within
3. Projects with independent utility
the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The
and logical termini to be studied in Tier
actions relate to the Interstate 81
2;
Corridor Improvement Study in
4. Types of Tier 2 NEPA document(s);
Virginia. The Federal actions, taken as
5. Location of the corridor for
a result of Tier 1 of a tiered
studying alignments in Tier 2; and
environmental review process under the
6. Possible purchase of certain rightNational Environmental Policy Act, 42
of-way parcels on a case-by-case basis.
U.S.C. 4321–4351 (NEPA), and
Interested parties may consult the
implementing regulations on tiering, 40 Tier 1 Record of Decision and Tier 1
CFR 1502.20, 40 CFR 1508.28, and 23
Final Environmental Impact Statement
CFR 771, determined certain issues
for further information on each of the
relating to the study. Those Tier 1
decisions described above.
decisions will be used by Federal
The Tier 1 actions by FHWA, and the
agencies in subsequent tier proceedings, law under which such actions were
including decisions on whether to grant taken, are described in the Tier 1 Final
licenses, permits, and approvals for
Environmental Impact Statement
highway projects. The Tier 1 decisions
approved March 21, 2007, the Tier 1
may also be relied upon by State and
Record of Decision issued June 6, 2007,
local agencies in subsequent
and in other documents in the FHWA
proceedings.
project records. The Tier 1 Final
Environmental Impact Statement, the
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is
Tier 1 Record of Decision, and other
advising the public that it has made
documents in the FHWA project records
decisions that are subject to 23 U.S.C.
are available by contacting the FHWA or
139(l)(1) and are final with respect to
the Virginia Department of
Tier 1 within the meaning of that law.
Transportation at the address provided
A claim seeking judicial review of the
above. The Tier 1 Final Environmental
Tier 1 Federal agency decisions on the
Impact Statement and Tier 1 Record of
Interstate 81 Corridor Improvement
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Jane M. Pease,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–11706 Filed 6–15–07; 8:45 am]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Jane M. Pease,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–11681 Filed 6–15–07; 8:45 am]
5.250
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
18:19 Jun 15, 2007
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 10894.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of the President’s major disaster
declaration for the State of South
Dakota, dated 05/22/2007, is hereby
amended to establish the incident
period for this disaster as beginning
05/04/2007 and continuing through
06/08/2007.
All other information in the original
declaration remains unchanged.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
33555
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
33556
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Notices
Decision are also available online at
https://www.I-81.org.
This notice applies to all FHWA Tier
1 decisions that are final within the
meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) as of the
issuance date of this notice and all laws
under which such actions were taken,
including:
1. General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4351].
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued On: June 12, 2007.
John Simkins,
I–81 Corridor Environmental Project Manager.
[FR Doc. 07–2984 Filed 6–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4940–RY–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Amendment No. 5 to Released Rates
Decision No. MC–999]
Released Rates of Motor Common
Carriers of Household Goods
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
Request for comments on
proposed changes to the authorization
for motor common carriers of household
goods to offer ‘‘released rates,’’ under
which the carriers limit their liability to
consumers for loss of or damage to the
household goods transported.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Board proposes, and
seeks comment on, three changes to its
released rates authorization, to enhance
the protection of consumers whose
household goods are damaged or lost by
motor common carriers.
DATES: Comments are due July 30, 2007.
Reply comments (if any) are due August
13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10
copies of any comments, referring to
Amendment No. 5 to Released Rates
Decision No. MC–999, to: Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lawrence C. Herzig, (202) 245–0282.
[Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1–800–
877–8339].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior to
the enactment of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:19 Jun 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU),
Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144 (2005),
motor carriers of household goods
(HHG) were generally held liable, under
49 U.S.C. 14706, for the actual loss or
injury they caused to the property they
transported. Because most HHG are
‘‘used,’’ the carrier’s liability was for the
depreciated value of the goods.
However, under 49 U.S.C. 14706(f),
HHG carriers could, with the permission
of the Board, limit their liability by
offering ‘‘released rates,’’ under which a
carrier’s liability is limited to a value
established by written declaration of the
shipper or by written agreement. The
Board has authorized HHG carriers to
offer released rates under certain terms
and procedures.
The Board’s current released rates
orders—Released Rates of Motor
Common Carriers of Household Goods,
5 S.T.B. 1147 (2001), and Released
Rates of Motor Common Carriers of
Household Goods, Amendment No. 4 to
Released Rates Decision No. MC–999
(STB served Apr. 22, 2002, and July 26,
2006)—authorize HHG carriers to limit
their liability for damage to, or loss of,
the goods in their care upon a written
declaration of the shipper. Under these
orders, HHG carriers could avoid the
default cargo liability level by offering
their shippers a choice of two
alternative carrier-liability options
based on the rate that the shipper agreed
to pay for the transportation of its goods.
Under one option, the carrier’s cargo
liability is limited to 60 cents per pound
per article (‘‘60-cents option’’) if the
shipper writes a valuation of ‘‘60 cents
per pound’’ on the bill of lading/
contract. In that event, the shipper pays
only a base rate for the shipment.
Alternatively, for an additional charge,
the shipper may obtain ‘‘full value
protection’’ for the shipped goods (the
‘‘FVP option’’), meaning that the carrier
is liable for the replacement value of the
lost or damaged goods (up to the predeclared value of the shipment), or, at
the carrier’s option, for restoring
damaged goods to their prior condition.
In section 4207 of SAFETEA–LU,
Congress changed the statutorily
prescribed, standard cargo liability of
HHG carrier from the actual (i.e.,
depreciated) value of lost or damaged
goods to the replacement value of those
goods unless the shipper waives in
writing that level of protection See 49
U.S.C. 14706(f)(2), (3).1 Thus, the
1 The statutory amendment required a change to
the released rates authorization. See Released Rates
of Motor Common Carriers of Household Goods,
Amendment No. 4 to Released Rates Decision No.
MC–999 (STB served June 13, 2007). As noted in
that decision, we construe the new statutory default
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
standard (or default) cargo liability of a
HHG carrier is now the replacement
value of the goods (for example, the
value of a comparable new television to
replace a used television that was lost
in a household move, rather than the
depreciated value of the used
television).
Also in SAFETEA–LU, at section
4215, Congress directed the Board to
review the current Federal regulations
regarding the level of cargo liability
protection provided by motor carriers
that transport HHG and to revise the
regulations, if necessary, to provide
enhanced protection in the case of loss
or damage. After receiving public
comments, the Board published its
review in Review of Liability of Motor
Common Carriers of Household Goods,
STB Ex Parte No. 662 (Review) (STB
served Aug. 9, 2006).
In the Review proceeding, the
Consumer Protection Division of the
Office of the Attorney General of
Maryland (Consumer Protection
Division) suggested ways to condition
the released rates authorization to
enhance consumer protection. We
propose to adopt the Consumer
Protection Division’s two suggested
changes, and ask for comment on those
two proposed changes as well as a third
proposed change. In addition, we invite
suggestions on any other conditions that
could help to ensure that consumers
understand the consequences of
selecting the 60-cents option when
shipping their HHG.
Requiring All Shipping Documents to
Include Full Value Protection. The
Consumer Protection Division indicated
that each year it receives complaints
from consumers who did not know that
they had shipped their goods under the
60-cents option until they filed claims
with the moving company for property
that was lost, stolen, or damaged during
the move. According to the Consumer
Protection Division, moving companies
often include in their basic moving
contract a waiver of the consumer’s
right to FVP, and consumers sign
contracts without understanding that
they are agreeing to limit the moving
company’s liability.
As suggested by the Consumer
Protection Division, the Board proposes
to require moving companies to provide,
in any order for service, contract form,
or bill of lading, a provision for, and a
written estimate of, the cost of the move
under FVP. If the moving company
provides only the required estimate at
FVP and the shipper accepts, the
shipper will have the standard
level of liability as the equivalent of what formerly
was the FVP option.
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 116 (Monday, June 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33555-33556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2984]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on the Interstate 81
Corridor Improvement Study in Virginia
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions
by FHWA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions taken by the FHWA that are final
within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to the
Interstate 81 Corridor Improvement Study in Virginia. The Federal
actions, taken as a result of Tier 1 of a tiered environmental review
process under the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321-
4351 (NEPA), and implementing regulations on tiering, 40 CFR 1502.20,
40 CFR 1508.28, and 23 CFR 771, determined certain issues relating to
the study. Those Tier 1 decisions will be used by Federal agencies in
subsequent tier proceedings, including decisions on whether to grant
licenses, permits, and approvals for highway projects. The Tier 1
decisions may also be relied upon by State and local agencies in
subsequent proceedings.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is advising the public that it has made
decisions that are subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) and are final with
respect to Tier 1 within the meaning of that law. A claim seeking
judicial review of the Tier 1 Federal agency decisions on the
Interstate 81 Corridor Improvement Study will be barred unless the
claim is filed on or before December 17, 2007. If the Federal law that
authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period of less
that 180 days for filing such claim, then that shorter time period
still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Simkins, I-81 Corridor
Environmental Project Manager, Federal Highway Administration, 400
North 8th Street, Suite 750, Richmond, Virginia 23219-4825; telephone:
(804) 775-3342; e-mail: John.Simkins@dot.gov. The FHWA Virginia
Division Office's normal business hours are 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. (eastern
time). For the Virginia Department of Transportation: Mr. Chris
Collins, Project Studies Manager, Virginia Department of
Transportation, 1401 East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219;
telephone (804) 225-4249; e-mail: CG.Collins@VirginiaDOT.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that FHWA has issued
a Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement and Tier 1 Record of
Decision for the Interstate 81 Corridor Improvement Study in Virginia.
Decisions in the Tier 1 Record of Decision include the following:
1. Improvement concept to be advanced;
2. Advancing I-81 as a toll pilot facility under Section 1216(b) of
the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21);
3. Projects with independent utility and logical termini to be
studied in Tier 2;
4. Types of Tier 2 NEPA document(s);
5. Location of the corridor for studying alignments in Tier 2; and
6. Possible purchase of certain right-of-way parcels on a case-by-
case basis.
Interested parties may consult the Tier 1 Record of Decision and
Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement for further information on
each of the decisions described above.
The Tier 1 actions by FHWA, and the law under which such actions
were taken, are described in the Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact
Statement approved March 21, 2007, the Tier 1 Record of Decision issued
June 6, 2007, and in other documents in the FHWA project records. The
Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement, the Tier 1 Record of
Decision, and other documents in the FHWA project records are available
by contacting the FHWA or the Virginia Department of Transportation at
the address provided above. The Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact
Statement and Tier 1 Record of
[[Page 33556]]
Decision are also available online at https://www.I-81.org.
This notice applies to all FHWA Tier 1 decisions that are final
within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) as of the issuance date of
this notice and all laws under which such actions were taken,
including:
1. General: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C.
4321-4351].
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued On: June 12, 2007.
John Simkins,
I-81 Corridor Environmental Project Manager.
[FR Doc. 07-2984 Filed 6-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4940-RY-M