Geological and Geophysical (G&G) Explorations of the Outer Continental Shelf-Changing Proprietary Term of Certain Geophysical Information, 33417-33423 [07-2960]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
LEARJET: Docket No. FAA–2006–25174;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–007–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by July 13, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Learjet Model 45
airplanes, certificated in any category; serial
numbers (S/Ns) 45–002 through 45–302
inclusive, and S/Ns 45–2001 through 45–
2049 inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from new and more
restrictive life limits and inspection intervals
for certain principal structural elements
(PSEs). We are issuing this AD to ensure that
fatigue cracking of various PSEs is detected
and corrected; such fatigue cracking could
adversely affect the structural integrity of
these airplanes.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to
certain operator maintenance documents to
include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR
91.403(c). For airplanes that have been
previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by these inspections, the
operator may not be able to accomplish the
inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c),
the operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
according to paragraph (g) of this AD. The
request should include a description of
changes to the required inspections that will
ensure the continued damage tolerance of the
affected structure. The FAA has provided
guidance for this determination in Advisory
Circular (AC) 25–1529–1.
Revise the Airworthiness Limitations
Section (ALS)
(f) Within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, revise the ALS of the airplane
maintenance manual (AMM) to include new
life limits and inspection intervals according
to a method approved by the Manager,
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA. Incorporating the applicable chapters
in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD in the
AMM is one approved method for doing the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Jun 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
revision. Thereafter, except as provided in
paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative life
limits or inspection intervals may be
approved for the affected PSEs.
(1) For Learjet Model 45 airplanes, S/Ns
45–002 through 45–302 inclusive: Chapter 4
of the Learjet 45 Maintenance Manual,
Revision 38, dated April 24, 2006.
(2) For Learjet Model 45 airplanes, S/Ns
45–2001 through 45–2049 inclusive: Chapter
4 of the Learjet 40 Maintenance Manual,
Revision 6, dated April 24, 2006.
Note 2: After an operator complies with the
requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD, that
paragraph does not require that operators
subsequently record accomplishment of
those requirements each time an action is
accomplished according to that operator’s
FAA-approved maintenance inspection
program.
AMOCs
(g)(1) The Manager, Wichita ACO, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 8,
2007.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–11682 Filed 6–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
30 CFR Part 251
RIN 1010–AD41
Geological and Geophysical (G&G)
Explorations of the Outer Continental
Shelf—Changing Proprietary Term of
Certain Geophysical Information
Minerals Management Service
(MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The MMS proposes to extend
the proprietary term of certain
reprocessed geophysical information
submitted to MMS under a permit. The
proposed rule would give up to 5 years
of additional protection to reprocessed
vintage geophysical information that
MMS retained and, under the current
rule, is subject to release by MMS 25
years after issuing the germane permit.
The extension would provide incentives
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33417
to permittees and third parties to
reprocess, market, or in other ways use
geophysical information that may not
otherwise be reprocessed without the
term extension.
DATES: Submit comments by August 17,
2007. The MMS may not fully consider
comments received after this date.
Submit comments to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) on the
information collection burden in this
proposed rule by July 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the rulemaking by any of the
following methods. Please use the
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1010–AD41 as an identifier in your
message. See also Public Availability of
Comments under Procedural Matters.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions on the website for
submitting comments.
• E-mail MMS at
rules.comments@mms.gov. Use RIN
1010–AD41 in the subject line.
• Fax: 703–787–1546. Identify with
the RIN, 1010–AD41.
• Mail or hand-carry comments to the
Department of the Interior; Minerals
Management Service; Attention:
Regulations and Standards Branch
(RSB); 381 Elden Street, MS–4024;
Herndon, Virginia 20170–4817. Please
reference ‘‘Changing Proprietary Term
of Certain Geophysical Information,
1010–AD41’’ in your comments and
include your name and return address.
• Send comments on the information
collection in this rule to: Interior Desk
Officer 1010–0048, Office of
Management and Budget; 202–395–6566
(fax); e-mail: oira_docket@omb.eop.gov.
Please also send a copy to MMS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Zinzer, Geophysicist, Offshore
Minerals Management, Resource
Evaluation Division, at (703) 787–1628
or e-mail david.zinzer@mms.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summary of Proposed Rulemaking
The MMS proposes to extend, upon
successful application to MMS, the
proprietary term of geophysical
information that a permittee or third
party reprocessed 20 or more years after
MMS issued the germane permit under
which the originating data were
collected. The proposed rule gives up to
5 years of additional protection to
reprocessed vintage geophysical
information that MMS retained and,
under the current rule, is subject to
release by MMS 25 years after issuing
the permit. The extension would
provide incentives to permittees and
third parties to reprocess, market, or in
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
33418
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
other ways use geophysical information
that may not otherwise be reprocessed
without the term extension.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Industry Concerns With Previous Final
Rulemaking
Final rulemaking at part 251 (71 FR
16033, March 30, 2006, effective date
May 1, 2006) modified the start dates of
proprietary terms for geophysical data
and information and any derivatives of
these data and information that MMS
acquires for retention from permittees
and third parties. The start dates
changed from the date of submittal to
the date of the permit under which the
originating data were collected,
retroactive to 1976.
The International Association of
Geophysical Contractors (IAGC), in an
April 21, 2006, letter to Director R.M.
‘‘Johnnie’’ Burton, mostly objected to
changes that affect the proprietary term
for reprocessed geophysical
information. Before the May 1, 2006,
rule changes, the derivative reprocessed
information enjoyed its own new 25year term, starting on the date of its
submittal to MMS. After the May 1
changes, reprocessed information
enjoyed the same 25-year term as the
original information, starting on the date
the germane permit was issued.
An example of IAGC’s concerns is if
before the May 1, 2006, changes,
geophysical information derived from
data collected under a 1985 permit were
reprocessed and submitted to MMS for
retention in January 2006, its
proprietary term would expire in 2031
(2006 + 25). After the May 1, 2006, rule
changes, the proprietary term of the
reprocessed information submitted in
January 2006, would expire in 2010
(1985 + 25). If the same information
were to be submitted in 2011 or later,
it would be subject to immediate public
release, since the applicable 25-year
term would have already expired.
The IAGC letter also stated that one
permittee that is actively reprocessing
vintage geophysical information derived
from data collected in the Alaska Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) concluded that
the May 1 changes to the rule will cost
the permittee significant future revenue,
as repeated global experience
demonstrates that some clients will just
wait for the new geophysical
information to be handed to them for
free in a short time (after release by
MMS). Third parties who reprocess
geophysical information acquired from
permittees would also lose reprocessing
investment opportunities for their
geophysical information.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Jun 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
MMS Response to Industry Concerns
The MMS recognizes that industry
invests significant capital in
reprocessing geophysical information;
however, the IAGC letter did not
document or quantify costs to industry
directly related to the May 1 changes to
part 251. Furthermore, MMS rarely
selects and retains minimally processed
geophysical information, the type of
reprocessed geophysical information
that is of most interest and value to
industry.
Permittees commonly offer licenses
for geophysical information with
application of only routine editing of
field tapes and common processing and
reprocessing techniques. Geophysical
information at this early stage of the
processing sequence is the most suitable
and flexible for subsequent
reprocessing. Many third parties prefer
to apply their own advanced processing
techniques to geophysical information
licensed from permittees. Permittees
will also further reprocess the
information, applying advanced
algorithms and other techniques, for
license or sale.
However, as a matter of practice,
MMS does not acquire minimally
reprocessed geophysical information, as
MMS does not have the capability to
further process the information using
advanced techniques. Moreover, MMS
does not release geophysical
information it does not acquire for
retention, including valuable minimally
processed geophysical information.
Most geophysical information
submitted to and retained by MMS was
reprocessed to or near the final stages of
the processing sequence. This
geophysical information is useful for
viewing and merging with other types of
information. However, it is basically not
suitable for further processing and
consequently of little interest or value to
industry for that purpose when it is
released to the public following
expiration of its proprietary term.
Furthermore, most reprocessing by
permittees or third parties occurs in the
first few years of the 25-year proprietary
term, not near the end of the term, when
there is less time to sell, license, or
otherwise make use of the reprocessed
information.
Also cited in the IAGC letter is lost
opportunity for MMS and the public
interest to have vintage information
made available in a format that can be
meaningful using modern processing
technologies. Industry submitted similar
comments on changes put forth in the
related notice of proposed rulemaking,
published July 17, 2002 (67 FR 46942),
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
which preceded the March 31, 2006,
final rulemaking.
In some cases the confidentiality
period is in effect shortened by more
than 10 years. In such cases, more than
40 percent of the time over which one
would expect to recover the initial
investment and earn a return will be
lost. For example, if geophysical
information from a 1985 permit were
submitted to MMS in 2002, the
information would be released in 2027
(2002 + 25), a total term of protection of
42 years (1985–2027) under the
previous rule. It would be released in
2010 under the current rule, a loss of 17
years (2027–2010), or 40 percent (17/42)
of the 42-year term under the previous
rule. Resetting the start date of the 25year proprietary term to the date the
permit is issued reduces the economic
life of new geophysical information, and
in effect reduces the return on
investment in future non-exclusive
seismic programs, stifling healthy
competition and investment in new
technologies and innovation. Valueadded derivative products created when
legacy (vintage) geophysical information
is reprocessed, applying new technology
and computer power, are becoming
increasingly vital to the exploration and
production process in the Gulf of
Mexico.
The MMS notes that before the May
1, 2006, changes, reprocessed
geophysical information could have in
effect up to a 50-year proprietary term
if it were submitted at the end of the
initial 25-year term (25-year original
term + 25-year new term). This would
be virtually the same as the 50-year term
for geophysical data and in sharp
contrast to the proprietary terms for
geophysical data and information
submitted under a MMS lease (10 years
or when the lease expires, whichever is
sooner), or for geophysical information
collected on the continental shelves of
the United Kingdom, Australia, or
Norway (2 to 10 years). The 25-year
term, starting on the date of the permit,
in the 2006 final rule was considered by
MMS a reasonable amount of time for a
permittee or third party to receive a fair
return on investment in acquiring,
processing, or reprocessing geophysical
information.
Proposed Rulemaking Details
To address industry concerns
regarding release of geophysical
information reprocessed near the end of
its 25-year term, MMS proposes in this
rule to extend, upon successful
application to MMS, the proprietary
term for geophysical information for
which reprocessing was completed in
the last 5 years of its initial 25-year
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
proprietary term, or thereafter. The term
of geophysical information that was
processed or reprocessed up to the 20th
anniversary of the date of the germane
permit is not affected by this proposed
rulemaking.
Permittees and third parties may
apply to MMS for an extension of the
proprietary term, starting on the date of
completion of reprocessing the
geophysical information. The
application must include:
• Name and address of the permittee
or third party;
• Product name;
• Identification of the geophysical
information-area;
• Identification of originating permit
number and date;
• Description of reprocessing
performed;
• Identification of the date of
completion of reprocessing the
geophysical information;
• Certification that the product meets
the definition of processed geophysical
information and that all other
information in the application is
accurate; and
• Signature and date.
If MMS disapproves the application
for an extension, the Regional Director
will state the reasons for the denial and
will advise the applicant of changes
needed to obtain approval. There will be
a 1-year grace period, starting on the
date that the final rule becomes
effective, to allow permittees and third
parties sufficient time to meet the above
requirements and file separate
applications for each extension. During
this time, MMS will not release
geophysical information which was
reprocessed 20 or more years after MMS
issued the germane permit.
After the 1-year grace period, MMS
will resume releasing eligible
reprocessed information. Also, in order
to obtain an extension, permittees and
third parties must apply for the
extension within 30 days after the date
of completion of the reprocessing. If an
application is not filed, not filed on
time, or if the application is not
approved by MMS, the original 25-year
proprietary term applies to the release
date of the reprocessed geophysical
information.
Procedural Matters
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Jun 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order (E.O.) 12866)
This proposed rule is not a significant
rule as determined by the OMB and is
not subject to review under E.O. 12866.
(1) The proposed rule would not have
an annual effect of $100 million or more
on the economy. It would not adversely
affect in a material way the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities.
The MMS estimates that over the first
5 years after the rule becomes effective,
revenue generated by licensing or
selling geophysical information
reprocessed 20 or more years after MMS
issued the germane permit and for
which MMS extended the proprietary
term, would be in a range from $3
million to $25 million over the period.
More revenue would be generated in the
first year during which there is a 1-year
grace period to apply for extensions of
proprietary terms of all eligible
reprocessed information. In subsequent
years, applications must be filed within
30 days of completion of processing.
The range of estimated values
depends on the number of lease sales in
areas where eligible vintage geophysical
information exists, mostly in the Alaska
OCS, the amount and quality of
reprocessed geophysical information,
and economic factors. MMS assumes 15
extensions would be approved over the
5-year period after the final rule is
effective.
(2) The proposed rule would not
create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency.
(3) The proposed rule would not alter
the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user fees or loan programs, or the
rights or obligations of their recipients.
(4) The proposed rule would not raise
novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Department certifies that this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This proposed rule would extend the
proprietary term for vintage reprocessed
geophysical information. The only
entities affected by this proposed rule
change are about 10 geophysical
companies, if still in existence, whose
reprocessed geophysical information
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33419
being held by MMS may be released
later than under current regulations.
The Small Business Administration
classifies geophysical surveying and
mapping service companies under the
North American Industry Classification
System Code 541360. The criteria for
determining a small entity for this
classification code is annual receipts of
less than $4.5 million. All of the 10
geophysical companies potentially
affected by this proposed rule have
annual receipts greater than $4.5
million; therefore, this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic
effect on a substantial number of small
entities.
Your comments are important. The
Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were
established to receive comments from
small businesses about Federal agency
enforcement actions. The Ombudsman
will annually evaluate the enforcement
activities and rate each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on the actions of
MMS, call 1–888–734–3247. You may
comment to the Small Business
Administration without fear of
retaliation. Disciplinary action for
retaliation by an MMS employee may
include suspension or termination from
employment with the DOI.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This proposed rule is not a major rule
under the SBREFA (5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
This proposed rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Would not cause a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Would not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Leasing on the U.S. Outer Continental
Shelf (OCS) is limited to residents of the
U.S. or companies incorporated in the
U.S. The proposed rule would not
change that requirement.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This proposed rule would not impose
an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
proposed rule would not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
33420
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the information required by the UMRA
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
This is because the proposal would not
affect State, local, or tribal governments,
and the effect on the private sector is
small.
Takings Implication Assessment
(Executive Order 12630)
This proposed rule is not a
governmental action capable of
interference with constitutionally
protected property rights. Thus, MMS
did not need to prepare a Takings
Implication Assessment according to
E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
With respect to E.O. 13132, this
proposed rule would not have
federalism implications. This proposed
rule would not substantially and
directly affect the relationship between
the Federal and State governments. To
the extent that State and local
governments have a role in OCS
activities, this proposed rule would not
affect that role.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
With respect to E.O. 12988, The Office
of the Solicitor has determined that the
proposed rule does not unduly burden
the judicial system and does meet the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Current 30 CFR 251
proposed
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This proposed rule contains a
collection of information that is being
submitted to OMB for review and
approval under § 3507(d) of the PRA. As
part of our continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burdens,
MMS invites the public and other
Federal agencies to comment on any
aspect of the reporting and
recordkeeping burden. If you wish to
comment on the information collection
aspects of revised 30 CFR 251, you may
send your comments directly to OMB
(see the ADDRESSES section of this
notice). Please identify your comments
with 1010–0048. Send a copy of your
comments to the Regulations and
Standards Branch, Attn: Comments; 381
Elden Street, MS–4024; Herndon,
Virginia 20170–4817. You may obtain a
copy of our submission to OMB to
revise and extend the OMB approval for
1010–0048 by contacting the Bureau’s
Information Collection Clearance Officer
at (202) 208–7744.
The PRA provides that an agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
contained in these proposed regulations
between 30 to 60 days after publication
of this document in the Federal
Register. Therefore, a comment to OMB
is best assured of having its full effect
if OMB received it by July 18, 2007.
This does not affect the deadline for the
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirement
public to comment to MMS on the
proposed regulations.
The title of the collection of
information for the rule is ‘‘30 CFR 251,
Geological and Geophysical (G&G)
Explorations of the Outer Continental
Shelf.’’
Respondents for this rulemaking
include approximately 10 Federal OCS
permittees. Responses to this collection
are mandatory and required for a
benefit. The frequency of reporting is on
occasion. The proposed new
requirement allows permittees and third
parties to apply for an extension of the
25-year proprietary term within 30 days
after the date of completion of the
reprocessing. MMS will protect
proprietary information according to the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552) and its implementing regulations
(43 CFR part 2), the Federal Oil and Gas
Royalty Management Act of 1982 (30
U.S.C. 1733), and under regulations at
30 CFR parts 250, 251, and 252. The
information collection (IC) does not
include questions of a sensitive nature.
The collection of information required
by the current subpart 30 CFR 251
regulations is approved under OMB
Control Number 1010–0048 (expiration
7/31/09). The proposed rule imposes a
new requirement to the information
collection for 3 burden hours. Once the
rulemaking becomes effective, the new
burden hours will be incorporated into
the existing information collection.
Refer to the chart for the current and
proposed burden.
Average number
of annual
responses
Hour burden
Annual burden
hours
Fee
Form
251.4(a), (b); 251.5(a), (b),
(d); 251.6; 251.7.
Apply for permits (form MMS–327) to conduct G&G exploration, including deep stratigraphic tests/revisions
when necessary.
6
110 Applications ....
660
110 applications × $1,900 fee = $209,000
Subtotal
110 responses
660
$209,000
General
251.4(b); 251.5(c), (d); 251.6
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
251.6(b) 251.7(b)(5) .............
251.7(c) ................................
251.9(c) ................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Jun 15, 2007
File notices to conduct scientific research activities, including notice to MMS prior to beginning and after
concluding activities.
Notify MMS if specific actions should occur; report archaeological resources. (No instances reported since
1982.).
Enter into agreement for group participation in test drilling, including publishing summary statement; provide
MMS copy of notice/list of participants. (No agreements submitted since 1989.).
Notify MMS to relinquish a permit ....................................
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6
4 Notices ................
24
1
1 Notice .................
1
1
1 Agreement ..........
1
⁄
8 Notices ................
4
12
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
33421
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Current 30 CFR 251
proposed
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirement
251.10(c) ..............................
251.1–251.14 .......................
File appeals .......................................................................
General departure and alternative compliance requests
not specifically covered elsewhere in part 251 regulations.
Retain G&G data/information for 10 years and make
available to MMS upon request.
Permit Form (Form MMS–
327).
Average number
of annual
responses
Hour burden
Annual burden
hours
Not subject to the PRA.
2 1 Request ..............
1
Subtotal
100 Recordkeepers
115 responses
0
2
100
132
Submissions
251.7 ....................................
251.7(d) ................................
251.8(b), (c) .........................
251.11; 251.12 .....................
251.14(a) ..............................
251.14(c)(2) .........................
251.14(c)(4) .........................
Submit information on test drilling activities under a permit, including Form MMS–123.
Submit bond(s) on deep stratigraphic test .......................
Burden included under 1010–0141.
0
Burden included under 30 CFR part
256 (1010–0006).
0
Subtotal
55 Respondents ×
4 Reports = 220.
50 Submissions .....
440
4
1
1 Comment ............
1
1
1 Comment ............
1
1
Submit modifications to, and status/final reports on, activities conducted under a permit.
Notify MMS and submit G&G data information collected
under a permit and/or processed by permittees or 3rd
parties, including reports, logs or charts, results analyses, descriptions, etc.
Submit comments on MMS intent to disclose data/info.
to the public.
Submit comments on MMS intent to disclose data/info.
to an independent contractor/agent.
Contractor/agent submits written commitment not to sell,
trade, license, or disclose data/info. without MMS consent.
1 Commitment .......
1
2
273 responses
200
643
Requests
251.8(a) ................................
251.13 ..................................
Permit Form (MMS-327);
251.14(b)(3).
Request reimbursement for certain costs associated with
MMS inspections. (No requests in many years. OCS
Lands Act requires Government reimbursement.).
Request reimbursement for certain costs associated with
reproducing data/information.
Request extension of time period for permitted activities.
Subtotal
1
1 Request ..............
1
2
50 Submissions .....
100
1
50 Extensions ........
50
101 responses
151
Extension
251.14(b)(1), (2), (5) ............
Permittees and 3rd parties apply for extension for geophysical information within 30 days after reprocessing
completion date.
Subtotal
Total Hour and Fee
Burden.
1
3 Extensions ..........
3 responses
...........................................................................................
3
3
599
1,586
602
1,589
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
$209,000 Fee
The MMS specifically solicits
comments on the following questions:
(1) Is the collection of information
necessary for MMS to properly perform
its functions, and will it be useful?
(2) Are the estimates of the burden
hours of the collection reasonable?
(3) Do you have any suggestions that
would enhance the quality, clarity, or
usefulness of the information to be
collected?
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Jun 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
(4) Is there a way to minimize the
information collection burden on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other forms of
information technology?
In addition, the PRA requires agencies
to estimate the total annual reporting
and recordkeeping ‘‘non-hour cost’’
burden resulting from the collection of
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information. Other than the cost
recovery fee listed in current regulations
at § 251.5, we have not identified any
other costs, and we solicit your
comments. For reporting and
recordkeeping only, your response
should split the cost estimate into two
components: (1) Total capital and
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
33422
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
startup cost component, and (2) annual
operation, maintenance, and purchase
of services components. Your estimates
should consider the costs to generate,
maintain, disclose or provide the
information. You should describe the
methods you use to estimate major cost
factors including system and technology
acquisition, expected useful life of
capital equipment, discount rate(s), and
the period over which you incur costs.
Capital and start-up costs include,
among other items, computers and
software you purchase to prepare for
collecting information; monitoring,
sampling, drilling, and testing
equipment; and record storage facilities.
Generally, our estimates should not
include equipment or services
purchased: Before October 1, 1995; to
comply with requirements not
associated with the information
collection; for reasons other than to
provide information or keep records for
the Government; or as part of customary
and usual business or private practices.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
MMS has analyzed this proposed rule
under the criteria of the NEPA and 516
Departmental Manual 6, Appendix
10.4C(1). MMS completed a Categorical
Exclusion Review for this action and
concluded that ‘‘the rulemaking does
not represent an exception to the
established criteria for categorical
exclusion; therefore, preparation of an
environmental analysis or
environmental impact statement will
not be required.’’
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
(Executive Order 13211)
Executive Order 13211 requires the
agency to prepare a Statement of Energy
Effects when it takes a regulatory action
that is identified as a significant energy
action. This proposed rule is not a
significant energy action, and therefore
would not require a Statement of Energy
Effects because it:
a. Is not a significant regulatory action
under E.O. 12866,
b. Is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy, and
c. Has not been designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, as a significant energy action.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13175, we
have evaluated this proposed rule and
determined that it has no potential
effects on federally recognized Indian
tribes. There are no Indian or tribal
lands in the OCS.
Clarity of This Regulation
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write regulations that are easy
to understand. MMS invites your
comments on how to make this
proposed rule easier to understand,
including answers to questions such as
the following:
(1) Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated?
(2) Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that interferes with
its clarity?
(3) Does the format of the rule
(grouping and order of sections, use of
headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce its clarity?
(4) Is the description of the proposed
rule in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this preamble helpful in
understanding the rule? What else can
MMS do to make the rule easier to
understand?
Send a copy of any comments that
concern how MMS could make this rule
easier to understand to: Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Department of the
Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20240. You may
also e-mail the comments to this
address: Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 251
Continental shelf, Freedom of
information, Oil and gas exploration,
Public lands—mineral resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Research.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
C. Stephen Allred,
Assistant Secretary—Land and Minerals
Management.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, MMS proposes to amend 30
CFR part 251 as follows:
PART 251—GEOLOGICAL AND
GEOPHYSICAL (G&G) EXPLORATIONS
OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
1. The authority citation for part 251
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 31 U.S.C.
9701.
2. Amend § 251.14 as set forth below:
A. Revise the introductory text in
paragraph (b);
B. Revise the table in paragraph (b)(1);
C. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(2) and
(b)(3) as (b)(6) and (b)(7), respectively;
and
D. Add new paragraphs (b)(2), (b)(3),
(b)(4), and (b)(5) to read as follows:
§ 251.14 Protecting and disclosing data
and information submitted to MMS under a
permit.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Timetable for release of G&G data
and information related to oil, gas, and
sulphur that MMS acquires. Except for
high-resolution data and information
released under 30 CFR 250.197(b)(2),
MMS will release or disclose acquired
data and information in accordance
with paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(7) of
this section.
(1) * * *
The Regional Director will release them to the public . . .
(i) Geological data and information ..........................................................
(ii) Geophysical data .................................................................................
(iii) Geophysical information reprocessed less than 20 years after MMS
issued the germane permit.
(iv) Geophysical information reprocessed 20 or more years after MMS
issued the germane permit.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
If you or a third party submit and MMS retains . . .
10 years after MMS issued the permit.
50 years after MMS issued the permit.
25 years after MMS issued the permit.
(2) Permittees and third parties may
apply to MMS for an extension of the
25-year proprietary term for geophysical
information reprocessed 20 or more
years after MMS issued the germane
permit. You must submit the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Jun 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
25 years after MMS issued the permit; or, if you or a third party applied
for an extension of the proprietary term, 5 years after MMS approved
the application.
application to MMS within 30 days after
completion of the reprocessing, except
during the initial 1-year grace period as
provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section. Filing locations are listed in
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 251.5(d). Your application must
include:
(i) Name and address of the permittee
or third party;
(ii) Product name;
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 116 / Monday, June 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Identification of the geophysical
information-area;
(iv) Identification of originating
permit number and date;
(v) Description of reprocessing
performed;
(vi) Identification of the date of
completion of reprocessing the
geophysical information;
(vii) Certification that the product
meets the definition of processed
geophysical information and that all
other information in the application is
accurate; and
(viii) Signature and date.
(3) There will be a 1-year grace
period, starting [EFFECTIVE DATE OF
THE FINAL RULE], to allow permittees
and third parties sufficient time to meet
the above requirements and to apply for
all eligible extensions. During this time,
MMS will not release geophysical
information which was reprocessed 20
or more years after the date that MMS
issued the germane permit.
(4) After [DATE 1 YEAR AFTER
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL
RULE], MMS will resume releasing
eligible reprocessed information. If an
application for extension is not filed,
not filed on time, or not approved by
MMS, the original 25-year proprietary
term applies to the release date of the
reprocessed geophysical information.
(5) You may apply for multiple
extensions related to the same permit;
however, the maximum proprietary
term for geophysical information is 50
years after MMS issued the permit.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 07–2960 Filed 6–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
will open on the hour and half-hour.
This action is necessary for workers
safety and will assist in expediting the
construction of the new bridge.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 2, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpb), Seventh Coast Guard District, 909
SE 1st Avenue, Room 432, Miami,
Florida 33131–3050. Commander (dpb)
maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will
become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at
Commander (dpb), Seventh Coast Guard
District, 909 SE 1st Avenue, Room 432,
Miami, Florida 33131–3050 between 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Michael Lieberum, Seventh Coast Guard
District, Bridge Branch, telephone
number 305–415–6744.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
that, from 12 noon to 6 p.m., on
Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, the
draw need open only on the hour,
quarter hour, half hour, and threequarter hour.
Due to the construction of a new high
level fixed Bridge, at Belleair Beach,
Intracoastal Waterway mile 131.8,
ECDriver, representing the owner of the
bridge, has requested that the Coast
Guard change the current operation of
the Belleair Beach Drawbridge. The
drawbridge will be required to open
twice an hour from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. In
addition, the waterway may be
restricted or closed for short periods to
allow for construction of the new
bridge. Exact times and dates of any
waterway restrictions and closures and
drawbridge restrictions will be
published in the Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners. In cases of emergency, the
drawbridge will be opened as soon as
possible. This regulation is necessary for
workers safety and will assist in
expediting construction of the new
bridge.
Request for Comments
The draw of the Belleair Beach
Drawbridge shall open on signal, except
that from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. the bridge
shall open on the hour and half-hour.
Waterway closures shall be authorized
by the Captain of the Port, St Petersburg,
as needed and will be published in the
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners. The draw shall open
as soon as possible for the passage of
tugs with tows, public vessels of the
United States and vessels in a situation
where a delay would endanger life or
property.
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking [CGD07–07–107],
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81/2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
[CGD07–07–107]
Public Meeting
RIN 1625–AA09
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the Bridge
Branch, Seventh Coast Guard District at
the address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Mile 131.8,
Belleair Beach, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
temporarily change the drawbridge
regulation of the Belleair Beach Bridge,
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway mile 131.8,
Belleair Beach, Pinellas County, Florida.
This proposed rule will require this
drawbridge to open on signal, except
that from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. this bridge
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Jun 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
33423
Background and Purpose
The existing regulation of the draw
bridge requires that the Belleair
Causeway bridge, mile 131.8 at
Clearwater, shall open on signal; except
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discussion of Proposed Rule
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary, because the rule will allow
for scheduled bridge openings of this
drawbridge and all waterway
restrictions or closure times will be
published with adequate time for
mariners to plan accordingly.
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 116 (Monday, June 18, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33417-33423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2960]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
30 CFR Part 251
RIN 1010-AD41
Geological and Geophysical (G&G) Explorations of the Outer
Continental Shelf--Changing Proprietary Term of Certain Geophysical
Information
AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The MMS proposes to extend the proprietary term of certain
reprocessed geophysical information submitted to MMS under a permit.
The proposed rule would give up to 5 years of additional protection to
reprocessed vintage geophysical information that MMS retained and,
under the current rule, is subject to release by MMS 25 years after
issuing the germane permit. The extension would provide incentives to
permittees and third parties to reprocess, market, or in other ways use
geophysical information that may not otherwise be reprocessed without
the term extension.
DATES: Submit comments by August 17, 2007. The MMS may not fully
consider comments received after this date. Submit comments to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on the information collection
burden in this proposed rule by July 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the rulemaking by any of the
following methods. Please use the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1010-AD41 as an identifier in your message. See also Public
Availability of Comments under Procedural Matters.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions on the website for submitting comments.
E-mail MMS at rules.comments@mms.gov. Use RIN 1010-AD41 in
the subject line.
Fax: 703-787-1546. Identify with the RIN, 1010-AD41.
Mail or hand-carry comments to the Department of the
Interior; Minerals Management Service; Attention: Regulations and
Standards Branch (RSB); 381 Elden Street, MS-4024; Herndon, Virginia
20170-4817. Please reference ``Changing Proprietary Term of Certain
Geophysical Information, 1010-AD41'' in your comments and include your
name and return address.
Send comments on the information collection in this rule
to: Interior Desk Officer 1010-0048, Office of Management and Budget;
202-395-6566 (fax); e-mail: oira_docket@omb.eop.gov. Please also send
a copy to MMS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Zinzer, Geophysicist, Offshore
Minerals Management, Resource Evaluation Division, at (703) 787-1628 or
e-mail david.zinzer@mms.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summary of Proposed Rulemaking
The MMS proposes to extend, upon successful application to MMS, the
proprietary term of geophysical information that a permittee or third
party reprocessed 20 or more years after MMS issued the germane permit
under which the originating data were collected. The proposed rule
gives up to 5 years of additional protection to reprocessed vintage
geophysical information that MMS retained and, under the current rule,
is subject to release by MMS 25 years after issuing the permit. The
extension would provide incentives to permittees and third parties to
reprocess, market, or in
[[Page 33418]]
other ways use geophysical information that may not otherwise be
reprocessed without the term extension.
Industry Concerns With Previous Final Rulemaking
Final rulemaking at part 251 (71 FR 16033, March 30, 2006,
effective date May 1, 2006) modified the start dates of proprietary
terms for geophysical data and information and any derivatives of these
data and information that MMS acquires for retention from permittees
and third parties. The start dates changed from the date of submittal
to the date of the permit under which the originating data were
collected, retroactive to 1976.
The International Association of Geophysical Contractors (IAGC), in
an April 21, 2006, letter to Director R.M. ``Johnnie'' Burton, mostly
objected to changes that affect the proprietary term for reprocessed
geophysical information. Before the May 1, 2006, rule changes, the
derivative reprocessed information enjoyed its own new 25-year term,
starting on the date of its submittal to MMS. After the May 1 changes,
reprocessed information enjoyed the same 25-year term as the original
information, starting on the date the germane permit was issued.
An example of IAGC's concerns is if before the May 1, 2006,
changes, geophysical information derived from data collected under a
1985 permit were reprocessed and submitted to MMS for retention in
January 2006, its proprietary term would expire in 2031 (2006 + 25).
After the May 1, 2006, rule changes, the proprietary term of the
reprocessed information submitted in January 2006, would expire in 2010
(1985 + 25). If the same information were to be submitted in 2011 or
later, it would be subject to immediate public release, since the
applicable 25-year term would have already expired.
The IAGC letter also stated that one permittee that is actively
reprocessing vintage geophysical information derived from data
collected in the Alaska Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) concluded that
the May 1 changes to the rule will cost the permittee significant
future revenue, as repeated global experience demonstrates that some
clients will just wait for the new geophysical information to be handed
to them for free in a short time (after release by MMS). Third parties
who reprocess geophysical information acquired from permittees would
also lose reprocessing investment opportunities for their geophysical
information.
MMS Response to Industry Concerns
The MMS recognizes that industry invests significant capital in
reprocessing geophysical information; however, the IAGC letter did not
document or quantify costs to industry directly related to the May 1
changes to part 251. Furthermore, MMS rarely selects and retains
minimally processed geophysical information, the type of reprocessed
geophysical information that is of most interest and value to industry.
Permittees commonly offer licenses for geophysical information with
application of only routine editing of field tapes and common
processing and reprocessing techniques. Geophysical information at this
early stage of the processing sequence is the most suitable and
flexible for subsequent reprocessing. Many third parties prefer to
apply their own advanced processing techniques to geophysical
information licensed from permittees. Permittees will also further
reprocess the information, applying advanced algorithms and other
techniques, for license or sale.
However, as a matter of practice, MMS does not acquire minimally
reprocessed geophysical information, as MMS does not have the
capability to further process the information using advanced
techniques. Moreover, MMS does not release geophysical information it
does not acquire for retention, including valuable minimally processed
geophysical information.
Most geophysical information submitted to and retained by MMS was
reprocessed to or near the final stages of the processing sequence.
This geophysical information is useful for viewing and merging with
other types of information. However, it is basically not suitable for
further processing and consequently of little interest or value to
industry for that purpose when it is released to the public following
expiration of its proprietary term.
Furthermore, most reprocessing by permittees or third parties
occurs in the first few years of the 25-year proprietary term, not near
the end of the term, when there is less time to sell, license, or
otherwise make use of the reprocessed information.
Also cited in the IAGC letter is lost opportunity for MMS and the
public interest to have vintage information made available in a format
that can be meaningful using modern processing technologies. Industry
submitted similar comments on changes put forth in the related notice
of proposed rulemaking, published July 17, 2002 (67 FR 46942), which
preceded the March 31, 2006, final rulemaking.
In some cases the confidentiality period is in effect shortened by
more than 10 years. In such cases, more than 40 percent of the time
over which one would expect to recover the initial investment and earn
a return will be lost. For example, if geophysical information from a
1985 permit were submitted to MMS in 2002, the information would be
released in 2027 (2002 + 25), a total term of protection of 42 years
(1985-2027) under the previous rule. It would be released in 2010 under
the current rule, a loss of 17 years (2027-2010), or 40 percent (17/42)
of the 42-year term under the previous rule. Resetting the start date
of the 25-year proprietary term to the date the permit is issued
reduces the economic life of new geophysical information, and in effect
reduces the return on investment in future non-exclusive seismic
programs, stifling healthy competition and investment in new
technologies and innovation. Value-added derivative products created
when legacy (vintage) geophysical information is reprocessed, applying
new technology and computer power, are becoming increasingly vital to
the exploration and production process in the Gulf of Mexico.
The MMS notes that before the May 1, 2006, changes, reprocessed
geophysical information could have in effect up to a 50-year
proprietary term if it were submitted at the end of the initial 25-year
term (25-year original term + 25-year new term). This would be
virtually the same as the 50-year term for geophysical data and in
sharp contrast to the proprietary terms for geophysical data and
information submitted under a MMS lease (10 years or when the lease
expires, whichever is sooner), or for geophysical information collected
on the continental shelves of the United Kingdom, Australia, or Norway
(2 to 10 years). The 25-year term, starting on the date of the permit,
in the 2006 final rule was considered by MMS a reasonable amount of
time for a permittee or third party to receive a fair return on
investment in acquiring, processing, or reprocessing geophysical
information.
Proposed Rulemaking Details
To address industry concerns regarding release of geophysical
information reprocessed near the end of its 25-year term, MMS proposes
in this rule to extend, upon successful application to MMS, the
proprietary term for geophysical information for which reprocessing was
completed in the last 5 years of its initial 25-year
[[Page 33419]]
proprietary term, or thereafter. The term of geophysical information
that was processed or reprocessed up to the 20th anniversary of the
date of the germane permit is not affected by this proposed rulemaking.
Permittees and third parties may apply to MMS for an extension of
the proprietary term, starting on the date of completion of
reprocessing the geophysical information. The application must include:
Name and address of the permittee or third party;
Product name;
Identification of the geophysical information-area;
Identification of originating permit number and date;
Description of reprocessing performed;
Identification of the date of completion of reprocessing
the geophysical information;
Certification that the product meets the definition of
processed geophysical information and that all other information in the
application is accurate; and
Signature and date.
If MMS disapproves the application for an extension, the Regional
Director will state the reasons for the denial and will advise the
applicant of changes needed to obtain approval. There will be a 1-year
grace period, starting on the date that the final rule becomes
effective, to allow permittees and third parties sufficient time to
meet the above requirements and file separate applications for each
extension. During this time, MMS will not release geophysical
information which was reprocessed 20 or more years after MMS issued the
germane permit.
After the 1-year grace period, MMS will resume releasing eligible
reprocessed information. Also, in order to obtain an extension,
permittees and third parties must apply for the extension within 30
days after the date of completion of the reprocessing. If an
application is not filed, not filed on time, or if the application is
not approved by MMS, the original 25-year proprietary term applies to
the release date of the reprocessed geophysical information.
Procedural Matters
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order (E.O.) 12866)
This proposed rule is not a significant rule as determined by the
OMB and is not subject to review under E.O. 12866.
(1) The proposed rule would not have an annual effect of $100
million or more on the economy. It would not adversely affect in a
material way the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities.
The MMS estimates that over the first 5 years after the rule
becomes effective, revenue generated by licensing or selling
geophysical information reprocessed 20 or more years after MMS issued
the germane permit and for which MMS extended the proprietary term,
would be in a range from $3 million to $25 million over the period.
More revenue would be generated in the first year during which there is
a 1-year grace period to apply for extensions of proprietary terms of
all eligible reprocessed information. In subsequent years, applications
must be filed within 30 days of completion of processing.
The range of estimated values depends on the number of lease sales
in areas where eligible vintage geophysical information exists, mostly
in the Alaska OCS, the amount and quality of reprocessed geophysical
information, and economic factors. MMS assumes 15 extensions would be
approved over the 5-year period after the final rule is effective.
(2) The proposed rule would not create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.
(3) The proposed rule would not alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees or loan programs, or the rights or
obligations of their recipients.
(4) The proposed rule would not raise novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Department certifies that this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities
under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This proposed rule would extend the proprietary term for vintage
reprocessed geophysical information. The only entities affected by this
proposed rule change are about 10 geophysical companies, if still in
existence, whose reprocessed geophysical information being held by MMS
may be released later than under current regulations. The Small
Business Administration classifies geophysical surveying and mapping
service companies under the North American Industry Classification
System Code 541360. The criteria for determining a small entity for
this classification code is annual receipts of less than $4.5 million.
All of the 10 geophysical companies potentially affected by this
proposed rule have annual receipts greater than $4.5 million;
therefore, this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
effect on a substantial number of small entities.
Your comments are important. The Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were
established to receive comments from small businesses about Federal
agency enforcement actions. The Ombudsman will annually evaluate the
enforcement activities and rate each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on the actions of MMS, call 1-888-734-
3247. You may comment to the Small Business Administration without fear
of retaliation. Disciplinary action for retaliation by an MMS employee
may include suspension or termination from employment with the DOI.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This proposed rule is not a major rule under the SBREFA (5 U.S.C.
804(2)). This proposed rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
b. Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Would not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Leasing on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) is limited to
residents of the U.S. or companies incorporated in the U.S. The
proposed rule would not change that requirement.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This proposed rule would not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
million per year. The proposed rule would not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal governments or the private
sector. A statement containing
[[Page 33420]]
the information required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required. This is because the proposal would not affect State, local,
or tribal governments, and the effect on the private sector is small.
Takings Implication Assessment (Executive Order 12630)
This proposed rule is not a governmental action capable of
interference with constitutionally protected property rights. Thus, MMS
did not need to prepare a Takings Implication Assessment according to
E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
With respect to E.O. 13132, this proposed rule would not have
federalism implications. This proposed rule would not substantially and
directly affect the relationship between the Federal and State
governments. To the extent that State and local governments have a role
in OCS activities, this proposed rule would not affect that role.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
With respect to E.O. 12988, The Office of the Solicitor has
determined that the proposed rule does not unduly burden the judicial
system and does meet the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This proposed rule contains a collection of information that is
being submitted to OMB for review and approval under Sec. 3507(d) of
the PRA. As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burdens, MMS invites the public and other Federal agencies
to comment on any aspect of the reporting and recordkeeping burden. If
you wish to comment on the information collection aspects of revised 30
CFR 251, you may send your comments directly to OMB (see the ADDRESSES
section of this notice). Please identify your comments with 1010-0048.
Send a copy of your comments to the Regulations and Standards Branch,
Attn: Comments; 381 Elden Street, MS-4024; Herndon, Virginia 20170-
4817. You may obtain a copy of our submission to OMB to revise and
extend the OMB approval for 1010-0048 by contacting the Bureau's
Information Collection Clearance Officer at (202) 208-7744.
The PRA provides that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB is
required to make a decision concerning the collection of information
contained in these proposed regulations between 30 to 60 days after
publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a
comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB
received it by July 18, 2007. This does not affect the deadline for the
public to comment to MMS on the proposed regulations.
The title of the collection of information for the rule is ``30 CFR
251, Geological and Geophysical (G&G) Explorations of the Outer
Continental Shelf.''
Respondents for this rulemaking include approximately 10 Federal
OCS permittees. Responses to this collection are mandatory and required
for a benefit. The frequency of reporting is on occasion. The proposed
new requirement allows permittees and third parties to apply for an
extension of the 25-year proprietary term within 30 days after the date
of completion of the reprocessing. MMS will protect proprietary
information according to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552)
and its implementing regulations (43 CFR part 2), the Federal Oil and
Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1733), and under
regulations at 30 CFR parts 250, 251, and 252. The information
collection (IC) does not include questions of a sensitive nature.
The collection of information required by the current subpart 30
CFR 251 regulations is approved under OMB Control Number 1010-0048
(expiration 7/31/09). The proposed rule imposes a new requirement to
the information collection for 3 burden hours. Once the rulemaking
becomes effective, the new burden hours will be incorporated into the
existing information collection. Refer to the chart for the current and
proposed burden.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting and
Current 30 CFR 251 proposed recordkeeping Hour burden Average number of annual Annual burden
requirement responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
251.4(a), (b); 251.5(a), (b), Apply for permits 6 110 Applications......... 660
(d); 251.6; 251.7. (form MMS-327) to
conduct G&G
exploration,
including deep
stratigraphic tests/
revisions when
necessary.
----------------------------------------------------------
110 applications x $1,900 fee = $209,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal 110 responses 660
----------------------------------------------------------
$209,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
251.4(b); 251.5(c), (d); 251.6 File notices to 6 4 Notices................ 24
conduct scientific
research activities,
including notice to
MMS prior to
beginning and after
concluding
activities.
251.6(b) 251.7(b)(5).......... Notify MMS if 1 1 Notice................. 1
specific actions
should occur; report
archaeological
resources. (No
instances reported
since 1982.).
251.7(c)...................... Enter into agreement 1 1 Agreement.............. 1
for group
participation in
test drilling,
including publishing
summary statement;
provide MMS copy of
notice/list of
participants. (No
agreements submitted
since 1989.).
251.9(c)...................... Notify MMS to \1/2\ 8 Notices................ 4
relinquish a permit.
[[Page 33421]]
251.10(c)..................... File appeals......... Not subject to the PRA. 0
251.1-251.14.................. General departure and 2 1 Request................ 2
alternative
compliance requests
not specifically
covered elsewhere in
part 251 regulations.
Permit Form (Form MMS-327).... Retain G&G data/ 1 100 Recordkeepers........ 100
information for 10
years and make
available to MMS
upon request.
----------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal 115 responses 132
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
251.7......................... Submit information on Burden included under 1010-0141. 0
test drilling
activities under a
permit, including
Form MMS-123.
251.7(d)...................... Submit bond(s) on Burden included under 30 CFR part 256 0
deep stratigraphic (1010-0006).
test.
-------------------------------------------
251.8(b), (c)................. Submit modifications 2 55 Respondents x 4 440
to, and status/final Reports = 220.
reports on,
activities conducted
under a permit.
251.11; 251.12................ Notify MMS and submit 4 50 Submissions........... 200
G&G data information
collected under a
permit and/or
processed by
permittees or 3rd
parties, including
reports, logs or
charts, results
analyses,
descriptions, etc.
251.14(a)..................... Submit comments on 1 1 Comment................ 1
MMS intent to
disclose data/info.
to the public.
251.14(c)(2).................. Submit comments on 1 1 Comment................ 1
MMS intent to
disclose data/info.
to an independent
contractor/agent.
251.14(c)(4).................. Contractor/agent 1 1 Commitment............. 1
submits written
commitment not to
sell, trade,
license, or disclose
data/info. without
MMS consent.
----------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal 273 responses 643
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
251.8(a)...................... Request reimbursement 1 1 Request................ 1
for certain costs
associated with MMS
inspections. (No
requests in many
years. OCS Lands Act
requires Government
reimbursement.).
251.13........................ Request reimbursement 2 50 Submissions........... 100
for certain costs
associated with
reproducing data/
information.
Permit Form (MMS-327); Request extension of 1 50 Extensions............ 50
251.14(b)(3). time period for
permitted
activities..
----------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal 101 responses 151
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extension
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
251.14(b)(1), (2), (5)........ Permittees and 3rd 1 3 Extensions............. 3
parties apply for
extension for
geophysical
information within
30 days after
reprocessing
completion date.
----------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal 3 responses 3
----------------------------------------------------------
Total Hour and Fee Burden. ..................... 599 1,586
------------------------------------------
602 1,589
------------------------------------------
$209,000 Fee
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MMS specifically solicits comments on the following questions:
(1) Is the collection of information necessary for MMS to properly
perform its functions, and will it be useful?
(2) Are the estimates of the burden hours of the collection
reasonable?
(3) Do you have any suggestions that would enhance the quality,
clarity, or usefulness of the information to be collected?
(4) Is there a way to minimize the information collection burden on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology?
In addition, the PRA requires agencies to estimate the total annual
reporting and recordkeeping ``non-hour cost'' burden resulting from the
collection of information. Other than the cost recovery fee listed in
current regulations at Sec. 251.5, we have not identified any other
costs, and we solicit your comments. For reporting and recordkeeping
only, your response should split the cost estimate into two components:
(1) Total capital and
[[Page 33422]]
startup cost component, and (2) annual operation, maintenance, and
purchase of services components. Your estimates should consider the
costs to generate, maintain, disclose or provide the information. You
should describe the methods you use to estimate major cost factors
including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of
capital equipment, discount rate(s), and the period over which you
incur costs. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items,
computers and software you purchase to prepare for collecting
information; monitoring, sampling, drilling, and testing equipment; and
record storage facilities. Generally, our estimates should not include
equipment or services purchased: Before October 1, 1995; to comply with
requirements not associated with the information collection; for
reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the
Government; or as part of customary and usual business or private
practices.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. MMS has analyzed this
proposed rule under the criteria of the NEPA and 516 Departmental
Manual 6, Appendix 10.4C(1). MMS completed a Categorical Exclusion
Review for this action and concluded that ``the rulemaking does not
represent an exception to the established criteria for categorical
exclusion; therefore, preparation of an environmental analysis or
environmental impact statement will not be required.''
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (Executive Order 13211)
Executive Order 13211 requires the agency to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects when it takes a regulatory action that is identified as
a significant energy action. This proposed rule is not a significant
energy action, and therefore would not require a Statement of Energy
Effects because it:
a. Is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866,
b. Is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy, and
c. Has not been designated by the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, as a significant energy
action.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13175, we have evaluated this proposed
rule and determined that it has no potential effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes. There are no Indian or tribal lands in the
OCS.
Clarity of This Regulation
Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to write regulations
that are easy to understand. MMS invites your comments on how to make
this proposed rule easier to understand, including answers to questions
such as the following:
(1) Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?
(2) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity?
(3) Does the format of the rule (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its clarity?
(4) Is the description of the proposed rule in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this preamble helpful in understanding the rule?
What else can MMS do to make the rule easier to understand?
Send a copy of any comments that concern how MMS could make this
rule easier to understand to: Office of Regulatory Affairs, Department
of the Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240.
You may also e-mail the comments to this address: Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 251
Continental shelf, Freedom of information, Oil and gas exploration,
Public lands--mineral resources, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Research.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
C. Stephen Allred,
Assistant Secretary--Land and Minerals Management.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, MMS proposes to amend 30
CFR part 251 as follows:
PART 251--GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL (G&G) EXPLORATIONS OF THE
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
1. The authority citation for part 251 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 31 U.S.C. 9701.
2. Amend Sec. 251.14 as set forth below:
A. Revise the introductory text in paragraph (b);
B. Revise the table in paragraph (b)(1);
C. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) as (b)(6) and (b)(7),
respectively; and
D. Add new paragraphs (b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), and (b)(5) to read as
follows:
Sec. 251.14 Protecting and disclosing data and information submitted
to MMS under a permit.
* * * * *
(b) Timetable for release of G&G data and information related to
oil, gas, and sulphur that MMS acquires. Except for high-resolution
data and information released under 30 CFR 250.197(b)(2), MMS will
release or disclose acquired data and information in accordance with
paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(7) of this section.
(1) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Regional Director will
If you or a third party submit and MMS release them to the public . .
retains . . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Geological data and information.... 10 years after MMS issued the
permit.
(ii) Geophysical data.................. 50 years after MMS issued the
permit.
(iii) Geophysical information 25 years after MMS issued the
reprocessed less than 20 years after permit.
MMS issued the germane permit.
(iv) Geophysical information 25 years after MMS issued the
reprocessed 20 or more years after MMS permit; or, if you or a third
issued the germane permit. party applied for an extension
of the proprietary term, 5
years after MMS approved the
application.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Permittees and third parties may apply to MMS for an extension
of the 25-year proprietary term for geophysical information reprocessed
20 or more years after MMS issued the germane permit. You must submit
the application to MMS within 30 days after completion of the
reprocessing, except during the initial 1-year grace period as provided
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. Filing locations are listed in
Sec. 251.5(d). Your application must include:
(i) Name and address of the permittee or third party;
(ii) Product name;
[[Page 33423]]
(iii) Identification of the geophysical information-area;
(iv) Identification of originating permit number and date;
(v) Description of reprocessing performed;
(vi) Identification of the date of completion of reprocessing the
geophysical information;
(vii) Certification that the product meets the definition of
processed geophysical information and that all other information in the
application is accurate; and
(viii) Signature and date.
(3) There will be a 1-year grace period, starting [EFFECTIVE DATE
OF THE FINAL RULE], to allow permittees and third parties sufficient
time to meet the above requirements and to apply for all eligible
extensions. During this time, MMS will not release geophysical
information which was reprocessed 20 or more years after the date that
MMS issued the germane permit.
(4) After [DATE 1 YEAR AFTER EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL RULE], MMS
will resume releasing eligible reprocessed information. If an
application for extension is not filed, not filed on time, or not
approved by MMS, the original 25-year proprietary term applies to the
release date of the reprocessed geophysical information.
(5) You may apply for multiple extensions related to the same
permit; however, the maximum proprietary term for geophysical
information is 50 years after MMS issued the permit.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 07-2960 Filed 6-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P