Locality-Based Comparability Payments and Evacuation Payments, 33147-33148 [E7-11584]
Download as PDF
33147
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 115
Friday, June 15, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 531 and 550
RIN 3206–AL09
Locality-Based Comparability
Payments and Evacuation Payments
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
SUMMARY: These regulations finalize the
interim regulations that provide the
rules for determining an employee’s
official worksite when he or she
teleworks from an alternative worksite
during an emergency situation, such as
a pandemic health crisis, and permit an
agency to provide evacuation payments
to an employee who is ordered to
evacuate from his or her regular
worksite and directed to work from
home (or an alternative location
mutually agreeable to the agency and
the employee) during a pandemic health
crisis. The final regulations revise the
interim regulations to clarify that an
employee need not have a telework
agreement when directed to work from
home. These regulations are issued as
part of OPM’s efforts to provide agencies
with guidance to ensure they are able to
fulfill their critical missions while at the
same time protect their employees
should a pandemic health crisis occur.
DATES: The regulations are effective July
16, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene Holson by telephone at (202) 606–
2858, by fax at (202) 606–0824, or by email at pay-performancepolicy@opm.gov.
On August
17, 2006, the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) published interim
regulations (71 FR 47692) in 5 CFR parts
531 and 550 concerning pay actions for
employees affected by a pandemic
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jun 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
health crisis. The interim regulations (1)
Clarified the rules for determining an
employee’s official worksite for the
purpose of identifying his or her
location-based pay entitlements when
the employee teleworks from an
alternative worksite during an
emergency situation such as a pandemic
health crisis and (2) authorized agencies
to provide evacuation payments to an
employee who is ordered to evacuate
from his or her regular worksite and
directed to work from the employee’s
home (or an alternative location
mutually agreeable to the agency and
the employee) during a pandemic health
crisis. The 60-day comment period for
the interim regulations ended on
October 16, 2006. OPM received
comments from three Federal agencies.
One agency commented on the use of
the term ‘‘critical missions’’ in the
summary of the interim regulations:
‘‘These regulations are issued as part of
OPM’s efforts to provide agencies with
guidance to ensure they are able to
fulfill their critical missions while at the
same time protect their employees
should a pandemic health crisis occur.’’
The commenter noted that ‘‘The
National Strategy for Pandemic
Influenza’’ and ‘‘Federal Preparedness
Circular 65’’ use the term ‘‘essential
functions’’ instead of ‘‘critical
missions.’’ The agency recommended
that OPM replace the term ‘‘critical
missions’’ with ‘‘essential functions’’ to
ensure consistency in the terminology
used in other Federal guidance. We are
not making this change. We used
‘‘critical missions’’ in the summary
accompanying the interim regulations to
be consistent with the terminology used
in OPM’s Pandemic Influenza guidance
on OPM’s Web site at https://
www.opm.gov/pandemic/index.asp. The
term itself is not in the interim or final
regulations.
Official Worksite
The same agency also requested
clarification of the provision in
§ 531.605(d)(3), which states that an
authorized agency official may make a
temporary exception to the requirement
that a telework employee must report at
least once a week on a regular and
recurring basis to the regular worksite in
order for the employee to continue
receiving the locality rate for the regular
worksite. The commenter inquired as to
whether there is a time limit on how
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
long a temporary exception under
§ 531.605(d)(3), may be in effect. There
is no such time limit. The intent of
§ 531.605(d)(3) is to address certain
situations where the employee is
retaining his or her residence in the
commuting area for the regular worksite
but is temporarily unable to report to
the regular worksite for reasons beyond
the employee’s control. The fact that an
employee may receive lesser pay or
benefits if the official worksite is
changed to the telework location is not
a basis or justification for using this
temporary exception. A key
consideration is the need to preserve
equity between the telework employee
and non-telework employees who are
working in the same area as the
telework location. The temporary
exception should generally be used only
in cases where (1) the employee is
expected to stop teleworking and return
to work at the regular worksite in the
near future, or (2) the employee is
expected to continue teleworking but
will be able to report to the regular
worksite at least once a week on a
regular and recurring basis in the near
future. Examples of appropriate
temporary situations include: (1)
Recovery from an injury or medical
condition, or to assist with a family
member’s recovery from an injury or
medical condition; (2) emergency
situations that prevent an employee
from regularly commuting to the normal
worksite, such as a severe weather
emergency or a pandemic health crisis;
or (3) the employee is away from the
area on extended official travel. (See the
revised fact sheet, Official Worksite for
Location-Based Pay Purposes, on OPM’s
Web site at https://www.opm.gov/oca/
pay/html/Official_Duty_Station.asp.)
The commenter also asked whether the
authority to make a temporary exception
may be delegated. The regulatory
provisions at § 531.605(d)(3) do not
restrict an agency’s ability to delegate
the authority to make such temporary
exceptions.
Evacuation Payments
One agency suggested there is too
much emphasis on ‘‘pandemic health
crisis’’ in the regulations and
recommended replacing that term with
‘‘emergency situations, such as a
pandemic health crisis’’ because the
agency believes that most emergency
situations will be weather-related and
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
33148
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 115 / Friday, June 15, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
not health-related. In addition, the
agency suggested there is no need for
the new regulations at § 550.409. The
agency recommended deleting § 550.409
and suggested adding the term ‘‘such as
a pandemic health crisis’’ after ‘‘other
reasons’’ to the regulations at
§ 550.401(a). We are not adopting these
recommendations. Unlike emergency
situations where employees may be
ordered to evacuate a designated
geographic area (including evacuating
their worksites and homes), during a
pandemic health crisis employees may
likely be ordered to evacuate their
worksites to promote ‘‘social
distancing’’ but not ordered to evacuate
their homes. Because of these unique
conditions, we believe it is imperative
to limit the use of the evacuation
payment authority in § 550.409 to a
pandemic health crisis.
One agency recommended revising
§ 550.409(a) to make clear that an
agency’s authority during a pandemic
health crisis to order an employee to
evacuate from his or her worksite and
perform work from the employee’s
home includes the situation where the
agency and the employee do not have a
telework agreement in place at the time
the order to evacuate is issued. We agree
and have revised § 550.409(a). The
agency also recommended that OPM
delete the provision in § 550.409(a)
which limits an agency’s authority to
order an employee to perform work
from a location other than the
employee’s home to a location that is
‘‘mutually agreeable to the agency and
the employee.’’ The agency believes it is
impractical to require an agency and an
employee to engage in discussions with
the intent of reaching an agreement as
to where the employee is going to work,
especially in the context of an
emergency health crisis. We are not
adopting this recommendation. During a
pandemic health crisis, if an employee
does not comply with his or her
agency’s order to work from home, or
the agency and the employee cannot
agree on an alternative work location,
the agency may disapprove the
employee’s evacuation payments. Under
these circumstances, the employee may
be required to use his or her accrued
annual leave (i.e., ‘‘enforced leave’’),
may be furloughed, or disciplined, as
appropriate.
One agency noted that the issue of
temporary promotion pay is not clearly
addressed in the regulations. Under
§ 550.409(a), evacuated employees may
be assigned to perform any work
necessary or required to be performed
without regard to his or her grade, level,
or title. The regulations also require
agencies to compute evacuation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jun 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
payments under § 550.404, which states
that evacuation payments must be based
on the rate of pay to which the
employee was entitled immediately
before the issuance of the order to
evacuate. The commenter recommended
revising the regulations to clarify that
evacuation payments must be based on
the rate of pay to which the employee
was entitled immediately before the
issuance of the order to evacuate,
notwithstanding an agency’s policy or
collective bargaining agreement
regarding an employee’s entitlement to
a noncompetitive temporary promotion
when the employee is required to
perform higher-level duties during the
period of evacuation. We are not
adopting this recommendation. While
there may be circumstances in which it
will be necessary to temporarily
suspend certain provisions of an agency
policy or a collective bargaining
agreement in an emergency, it would be
inappropriate to provide such a broad
authorization to do so. The decision to
take such action must be made on a
case-by-case basis taking into
consideration the facts and
circumstances that exist at that time.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
The Office of Management and Budget
has reviewed this rule in accordance
with E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because they will apply only to Federal
agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 531 and
550
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Government
employees, Law enforcement officers,
Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 5 CFR parts 531 and 550,
which was published at 71 FR 47692 on
August 17, 2006, is adopted as final
with the following change:
I
PART 550—PAY ADMINISTRATION
(GENERAL)
1. The authority citation for subpart D
of part 550 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5527; E.O. 10982, 3
CFR parts 1959–1963, p. 502.
2. Amend § 550.409 by revising the
first sentence of paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 550.409 Evacuation payments during a
pandemic health crisis.
(a) An agency may order one or more
employees to evacuate from their
worksite and perform work from their
home (or an alternative location
mutually agreeable to the agency and
the employee) during a pandemic health
crisis without regard to whether the
agency and the employee have a
telework agreement in place at the time
the order to evacuate is issued.* * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–11584 Filed 6–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM379 Special Conditions No.
25–07–12–SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing Model 777–
300ER Airplane; Lithium Ion Battery
Installation
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Boeing Model 777–300ER
airplane. This airplane as modified by
the Boeing Commercial Airplane
Company will have a novel or unusual
design feature associated with the use of
lithium ion battery technology in onboard systems. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is June 1, 2007. We
must receive your comments by July 30,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this rule may
be mailed in duplicate to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Attention: Rules
Docket (ANM–113), Docket No. NM379,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; or delivered in
duplicate to the Transport Airplane
Directorate at the above address. All
comments must be marked Docket No.
NM379. Comments may be inspected in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 115 (Friday, June 15, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33147-33148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11584]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 115 / Friday, June 15, 2007 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 33147]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 531 and 550
RIN 3206-AL09
Locality-Based Comparability Payments and Evacuation Payments
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These regulations finalize the interim regulations that
provide the rules for determining an employee's official worksite when
he or she teleworks from an alternative worksite during an emergency
situation, such as a pandemic health crisis, and permit an agency to
provide evacuation payments to an employee who is ordered to evacuate
from his or her regular worksite and directed to work from home (or an
alternative location mutually agreeable to the agency and the employee)
during a pandemic health crisis. The final regulations revise the
interim regulations to clarify that an employee need not have a
telework agreement when directed to work from home. These regulations
are issued as part of OPM's efforts to provide agencies with guidance
to ensure they are able to fulfill their critical missions while at the
same time protect their employees should a pandemic health crisis
occur.
DATES: The regulations are effective July 16, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Holson by telephone at (202) 606-
2858, by fax at (202) 606-0824, or by e-mail at pay-performance-
policy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 17, 2006, the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) published interim regulations (71 FR 47692) in 5 CFR
parts 531 and 550 concerning pay actions for employees affected by a
pandemic health crisis. The interim regulations (1) Clarified the rules
for determining an employee's official worksite for the purpose of
identifying his or her location-based pay entitlements when the
employee teleworks from an alternative worksite during an emergency
situation such as a pandemic health crisis and (2) authorized agencies
to provide evacuation payments to an employee who is ordered to
evacuate from his or her regular worksite and directed to work from the
employee's home (or an alternative location mutually agreeable to the
agency and the employee) during a pandemic health crisis. The 60-day
comment period for the interim regulations ended on October 16, 2006.
OPM received comments from three Federal agencies.
One agency commented on the use of the term ``critical missions''
in the summary of the interim regulations: ``These regulations are
issued as part of OPM's efforts to provide agencies with guidance to
ensure they are able to fulfill their critical missions while at the
same time protect their employees should a pandemic health crisis
occur.'' The commenter noted that ``The National Strategy for Pandemic
Influenza'' and ``Federal Preparedness Circular 65'' use the term
``essential functions'' instead of ``critical missions.'' The agency
recommended that OPM replace the term ``critical missions'' with
``essential functions'' to ensure consistency in the terminology used
in other Federal guidance. We are not making this change. We used
``critical missions'' in the summary accompanying the interim
regulations to be consistent with the terminology used in OPM's
Pandemic Influenza guidance on OPM's Web site at https://www.opm.gov/
pandemic/index.asp. The term itself is not in the interim or final
regulations.
Official Worksite
The same agency also requested clarification of the provision in
Sec. 531.605(d)(3), which states that an authorized agency official
may make a temporary exception to the requirement that a telework
employee must report at least once a week on a regular and recurring
basis to the regular worksite in order for the employee to continue
receiving the locality rate for the regular worksite. The commenter
inquired as to whether there is a time limit on how long a temporary
exception under Sec. 531.605(d)(3), may be in effect. There is no such
time limit. The intent of Sec. 531.605(d)(3) is to address certain
situations where the employee is retaining his or her residence in the
commuting area for the regular worksite but is temporarily unable to
report to the regular worksite for reasons beyond the employee's
control. The fact that an employee may receive lesser pay or benefits
if the official worksite is changed to the telework location is not a
basis or justification for using this temporary exception. A key
consideration is the need to preserve equity between the telework
employee and non-telework employees who are working in the same area as
the telework location. The temporary exception should generally be used
only in cases where (1) the employee is expected to stop teleworking
and return to work at the regular worksite in the near future, or (2)
the employee is expected to continue teleworking but will be able to
report to the regular worksite at least once a week on a regular and
recurring basis in the near future. Examples of appropriate temporary
situations include: (1) Recovery from an injury or medical condition,
or to assist with a family member's recovery from an injury or medical
condition; (2) emergency situations that prevent an employee from
regularly commuting to the normal worksite, such as a severe weather
emergency or a pandemic health crisis; or (3) the employee is away from
the area on extended official travel. (See the revised fact sheet,
Official Worksite for Location-Based Pay Purposes, on OPM's Web site at
https://www.opm.gov/oca/pay/html/Official_Duty_Station.asp.) The
commenter also asked whether the authority to make a temporary
exception may be delegated. The regulatory provisions at Sec.
531.605(d)(3) do not restrict an agency's ability to delegate the
authority to make such temporary exceptions.
Evacuation Payments
One agency suggested there is too much emphasis on ``pandemic
health crisis'' in the regulations and recommended replacing that term
with ``emergency situations, such as a pandemic health crisis'' because
the agency believes that most emergency situations will be weather-
related and
[[Page 33148]]
not health-related. In addition, the agency suggested there is no need
for the new regulations at Sec. 550.409. The agency recommended
deleting Sec. 550.409 and suggested adding the term ``such as a
pandemic health crisis'' after ``other reasons'' to the regulations at
Sec. 550.401(a). We are not adopting these recommendations. Unlike
emergency situations where employees may be ordered to evacuate a
designated geographic area (including evacuating their worksites and
homes), during a pandemic health crisis employees may likely be ordered
to evacuate their worksites to promote ``social distancing'' but not
ordered to evacuate their homes. Because of these unique conditions, we
believe it is imperative to limit the use of the evacuation payment
authority in Sec. 550.409 to a pandemic health crisis.
One agency recommended revising Sec. 550.409(a) to make clear that
an agency's authority during a pandemic health crisis to order an
employee to evacuate from his or her worksite and perform work from the
employee's home includes the situation where the agency and the
employee do not have a telework agreement in place at the time the
order to evacuate is issued. We agree and have revised Sec.
550.409(a). The agency also recommended that OPM delete the provision
in Sec. 550.409(a) which limits an agency's authority to order an
employee to perform work from a location other than the employee's home
to a location that is ``mutually agreeable to the agency and the
employee.'' The agency believes it is impractical to require an agency
and an employee to engage in discussions with the intent of reaching an
agreement as to where the employee is going to work, especially in the
context of an emergency health crisis. We are not adopting this
recommendation. During a pandemic health crisis, if an employee does
not comply with his or her agency's order to work from home, or the
agency and the employee cannot agree on an alternative work location,
the agency may disapprove the employee's evacuation payments. Under
these circumstances, the employee may be required to use his or her
accrued annual leave (i.e., ``enforced leave''), may be furloughed, or
disciplined, as appropriate.
One agency noted that the issue of temporary promotion pay is not
clearly addressed in the regulations. Under Sec. 550.409(a), evacuated
employees may be assigned to perform any work necessary or required to
be performed without regard to his or her grade, level, or title. The
regulations also require agencies to compute evacuation payments under
Sec. 550.404, which states that evacuation payments must be based on
the rate of pay to which the employee was entitled immediately before
the issuance of the order to evacuate. The commenter recommended
revising the regulations to clarify that evacuation payments must be
based on the rate of pay to which the employee was entitled immediately
before the issuance of the order to evacuate, notwithstanding an
agency's policy or collective bargaining agreement regarding an
employee's entitlement to a noncompetitive temporary promotion when the
employee is required to perform higher-level duties during the period
of evacuation. We are not adopting this recommendation. While there may
be circumstances in which it will be necessary to temporarily suspend
certain provisions of an agency policy or a collective bargaining
agreement in an emergency, it would be inappropriate to provide such a
broad authorization to do so. The decision to take such action must be
made on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the facts and
circumstances that exist at that time.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
The Office of Management and Budget has reviewed this rule in
accordance with E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
will apply only to Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 531 and 550
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Government
employees, Law enforcement officers, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 5 CFR parts 531 and 550, which
was published at 71 FR 47692 on August 17, 2006, is adopted as final
with the following change:
PART 550--PAY ADMINISTRATION (GENERAL)
0
1. The authority citation for subpart D of part 550 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5527; E.O. 10982, 3 CFR parts 1959-1963, p.
502.
0
2. Amend Sec. 550.409 by revising the first sentence of paragraph (a)
to read as follows:
Sec. 550.409 Evacuation payments during a pandemic health crisis.
(a) An agency may order one or more employees to evacuate from
their worksite and perform work from their home (or an alternative
location mutually agreeable to the agency and the employee) during a
pandemic health crisis without regard to whether the agency and the
employee have a telework agreement in place at the time the order to
evacuate is issued.* * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-11584 Filed 6-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P