Migratory Bird Permits; Religious or Spiritual Use of Feathers by Native Americans, 33188-33190 [E7-11559]
Download as PDF
33188
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 115 / Friday, June 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Nevertheless, Indian Tribes that have
questions concerning the provisions of
this Proposed Rule or options for
compliance are encouraged to contact
the point of contact listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is not likely to have a
significant effect on the human
environment. Draft documentation
supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
seek any comments or information that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jun 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
(4) Marine Event Permits (CG–4423)
will still need to be sent to U. S. Coast
Guard Sector Sault Ste. Marie, MI.
(c) Notice of annual enforcement
period. The Captain of the Port Sault
Ste. Marie will cause notice of
enforcement of the safety zone
established by this section to be made
by all appropriate means to the affected
segments of the public including
publication in the Federal Register as
practicable, in accordance with 33 CFR
165.7(a). The COTP may also issue
notices in the Ninth Coast Guard
District Local Notice to Mariners the
dates and times this section will be
enforced each year.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Dated: May 10, 2007.
E.Q. Kahler,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sault Ste. Marie.
[FR Doc. E7–11539 Filed 6–14–07; 8:45 am]
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
2. Add § 165.937 to read as follows:
§ 165.937 Safety Zone; Annual River
Rampage Offshore Power Boat Races in the
Captain of the Port Sault Ste. Marie Zone.
(a) Location. The safety zone is
established for the waters of the St.
Mary’s River, adjacent to Sault Ste.
Marie, MI. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of the St. Mary’s
River within the following coordinates:
46°29′48″ N, 084°18′75″ W, then
northeast to 46°29′69″ N, 084°18′24″ W,
then southeast to 46°29′32″ N,
084°17′87″ W, then southwest to
46°29′19″ N, 084°18′11″ W. [DATUM:
NAD 83].
(b) Enforcement date. Last weekend in
July with the following Monday as a
rain date; sunrise to termination of
event.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23
apply.
(2) All persons and vessels must
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated on scene patrol personnel.
Coast Guard patrol personnel include
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel via siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the operator shall proceed
as directed.
(3) Recreational vessels may request
permission from the Captain of the Port
Sault Ste. Marie to transit the safety
zone. Approval will be made on a caseby-case basis. Requests must be made in
advance and approved by the Captain of
the Port before transits will be
authorized. The Captain of the Port may
be contacted via U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Sault Ste. Marie on Channel 16,
VHF–FM.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 21
RIN 1018–AV14
Migratory Bird Permits; Religious or
Spiritual Use of Feathers by Native
Americans
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; notice of intent to prepare
an environmental assessment; request
for comments and information.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service is considering amending its
migratory bird regulations to allow
Native Americans to acquire parts and
feathers from birds other than eagles for
religious or spiritual use. No current
regulations govern the acquisition and
possession of migratory bird parts and
feathers of birds other than eagles for
Native American religious or spiritual
use. We have a compelling interest in
protecting the traditional religious and
spiritual resource values of Native
Americans as part of our trust
relationship with federally recognized
Native American tribes. We recognize
the need to balance this compelling
reason against the equally compelling
basis for the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
We seek information necessary to
prepare an environmental assessment
under the National Environmental
Policy Act and its implementing
regulations for a possible proposed rule.
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 115 / Friday, June 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments
and suggestions on or before August 14,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Viewing Comments: If you
wish to view the complete file for this
action, including comments and
materials submitted by others, you may
call (612) 713–5436 to make an
appointment, during normal business
hours, to view materials at the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 1 Federal Drive,
Ft. Snelling, MN 55111.
Submitting Comments: When
submitting comments, refer to RIN
1018–AV14 and please include your
name and return address. Please submit
your comments by only one of the
following methods:
1. U.S. Mail: Andrea Kirk, Permits
Administrator, Migratory Birds (use
address above);
2. E-mail: otherfeathers@fws.gov;
3. Submit comments via https://
www.regulations.gov and reference RIN
1018–AV14; or
4. Fax: (612) 713–7179.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Kirk, Permits Administrator,
Migratory Birds—Region 3, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 1 Federal Drive,
Fort Snelling, MN 55111.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Background
We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), are the Federal agency
with the primary responsibility for
managing migratory birds. Our authority
is based on the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act (MBTA) (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.),
which implements conventions with
Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico,
Japan, and the Soviet Union (Russia).
Activities with migratory birds are
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by regulation. Regulations
governing the issuance of permits for
migratory bird use are authorized by the
MBTA and are found in title 50, Code
of Federal Regulations, parts 10, 13, 21,
and 22. According to 50 CFR 21.11,
permits are required for most actions
involving ‘‘any migratory bird, or the
parts, nests, or eggs of such bird.’’
The MBTA contains no express
provisions regarding the religious/
spiritual use of migratory bird feathers.
However, we recognize the significance
of the parts and feathers to Native
American religious/spiritual practices
under the American Indian Religious
Freedom Act (42 U.S.C. 1996; AIRFA),
a policy statement issued by Secretary
of the Interior C.B. Morton in 1975, and
our 1994 Native American Policy. The
American Indian Religious Freedom Act
(AIRFA), passed in 1978, clarifies U.S.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jun 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
policy pertaining to the protection of
Native American religious freedom.
AIRFA acknowledges prior infringement
on the right of freedom of religion for
Native Americans and clearly states that
laws passed for other purposes are not
meant to restrict the rights of Native
Americans. The Morton policy
statement provides Native Americans
protection from Federal prosecution,
harassment, or other interference for
their possession, transport, use,
donation, exchange, or loan of the
feathers of federally protected species
without compensation. The Morton
policy statement also protects Native
Americans who wish to possess bird
parts and/or feathers to be worked on by
tribal craftsmen for eventual use in
religious/spiritual activities and allows
the transfer of parts and/or feathers to
tribal craftsmen without charge.
Our 1994 Native American Policy
states that we must expedite processing
and distribution of animal parts to
Native Americans. Between 1990 and
2000, our National Eagle Repository
distributed eagle parts and feathers to
enrolled tribal members. Regulations
governing permits for use of eagle parts
and feathers are in 50 CFR Part 22. The
Repository also distributed migratory
bird parts and feathers from birds other
than eagles to enrolled tribes. We
conducted this distribution on an adhoc basis under the authority of 50 CFR
21.27, Special Purpose Permits, with no
criteria or conditions specific to Native
American religious or spiritual use. In
1999, we temporarily suspended
distribution of non-eagle feathers, due to
administrative resource constraints. We
now intend to prepare an environmental
assessment for a possible proposed
regulation for the legal acquisition by
Native Americans of non-eagle feathers
for religious/spiritual use.
Environmental Assessment
We intend to prepare an assessment
in order to analyze the potential impacts
of various alternatives for establishing a
legal mechanism for the acquisition of
non-eagle feathers by Native Americans
for religious/spiritual purposes. We will
assess potential impacts on the natural
and human environment that may result
from different alternatives for legalizing
the acquisition of these feathers,
including impacts to Native American
culture and religion. We particularly
solicit comments on the following
topics (most of these are discussed
further following the list):
(1) The source(s) of the parts and
feathers that we would make available;
(2) What criteria or conditions we
should establish for individuals to be
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33189
eligible to receive the migratory bird
parts and feathers;
(3) How different means of legal
acquisition may affect Native American
tribes;
(4) How Native American tribes could
be affected if we extend such
authorization to other persons in
addition to enrolled members of
federally recognized Native American
tribes;
(5) The extent of Native American
demand for the parts and feathers;
(6) Whether the types of feathers
being requested should be limited to
those historically significant to the tribe
acquiring them;
(7) Which species of migratory birds
are most valuable for Native American
religious/spiritual purposes;
(8) Potential impacts to migratory bird
populations and other wildlife; and
(9) Other concerns the public may
have related to this initiative.
Further discussion of selected items
from above list follows:
(1) Sources. The sources of the parts
and feathers to be made available is one
of the primary concerns of this notice.
The merits of centralized availability,
such as the National Eagle Repository,
versus decentralized availability, the
extent to which tribes will have access
and input into the source availability
and eventual acquisition, and the
various avenues for acquiring the
feathers and parts are issues upon
which we seek comments, suggestions,
and guidance from interested parties.
(2) Eligibility. The MBTA, unlike the
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
(16 U.S.C. 668a), does not provide for
possession of migratory birds for
religious/spiritual purposes by Native
American tribes, regardless of whether
or not they are members of recognized
tribes. However, we have traditionally
limited access to migratory birds and
their parts to enrolled members of
recognized tribes. We seek input on the
potential impacts of providing legal
access to non-eagle feathers for
religious/spiritual use to individuals
other than enrolled members of
recognized tribes, including impacts to
enrolled tribal members, members of
non-recognized tribes, or other affected
parties.
(3) Means. We will look favorably
upon methods that involve
decentralized availability and recognize
tribal autonomy. We seek a solution that
will uphold the MBTA without placing
a burden on our resources.
(4) Demand. We seek input,
suggestions, and comments on possible
uses, the frequency and pervasiveness of
these uses, and an estimation of the
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
33190
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 115 / Friday, June 15, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
demand upon the resource for these
uses.
(5) Wildlife Population and Habitat
Impacts. We do not expect to authorize
any means of acquisition that would
affect migratory bird or wildlife
populations or impact wildlife habitat.
We do not anticipate take from the wild
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jun 14, 2007
Jkt 211001
of live birds through hunting or any
other method. However, we seek input,
comments, and suggestions on this
issue.
Authority: The authorities for this notice
are the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 703–712), and the Bald
PO 00000
and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668a).
Dated: May 29, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. E7–11559 Filed 6–14–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 115 (Friday, June 15, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33188-33190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11559]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 21
RIN 1018-AV14
Migratory Bird Permits; Religious or Spiritual Use of Feathers by
Native Americans
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; notice of intent to
prepare an environmental assessment; request for comments and
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is considering amending its
migratory bird regulations to allow Native Americans to acquire parts
and feathers from birds other than eagles for religious or spiritual
use. No current regulations govern the acquisition and possession of
migratory bird parts and feathers of birds other than eagles for Native
American religious or spiritual use. We have a compelling interest in
protecting the traditional religious and spiritual resource values of
Native Americans as part of our trust relationship with federally
recognized Native American tribes. We recognize the need to balance
this compelling reason against the equally compelling basis for the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We seek information necessary to prepare an
environmental assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act
and its implementing regulations for a possible proposed rule.
[[Page 33189]]
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
and suggestions on or before August 14, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Viewing Comments: If you wish to view the complete file for
this action, including comments and materials submitted by others, you
may call (612) 713-5436 to make an appointment, during normal business
hours, to view materials at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1
Federal Drive, Ft. Snelling, MN 55111.
Submitting Comments: When submitting comments, refer to RIN 1018-
AV14 and please include your name and return address. Please submit
your comments by only one of the following methods:
1. U.S. Mail: Andrea Kirk, Permits Administrator, Migratory Birds
(use address above);
2. E-mail: otherfeathers@fws.gov;
3. Submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov and reference RIN
1018-AV14; or
4. Fax: (612) 713-7179.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Kirk, Permits Administrator,
Migratory Birds--Region 3, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1 Federal
Drive, Fort Snelling, MN 55111.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are the Federal
agency with the primary responsibility for managing migratory birds.
Our authority is based on the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (16
U.S.C. 703 et seq.), which implements conventions with Great Britain
(for Canada), Mexico, Japan, and the Soviet Union (Russia). Activities
with migratory birds are prohibited unless specifically authorized by
regulation. Regulations governing the issuance of permits for migratory
bird use are authorized by the MBTA and are found in title 50, Code of
Federal Regulations, parts 10, 13, 21, and 22. According to 50 CFR
21.11, permits are required for most actions involving ``any migratory
bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such bird.''
The MBTA contains no express provisions regarding the religious/
spiritual use of migratory bird feathers. However, we recognize the
significance of the parts and feathers to Native American religious/
spiritual practices under the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (42
U.S.C. 1996; AIRFA), a policy statement issued by Secretary of the
Interior C.B. Morton in 1975, and our 1994 Native American Policy. The
American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA), passed in 1978,
clarifies U.S. policy pertaining to the protection of Native American
religious freedom. AIRFA acknowledges prior infringement on the right
of freedom of religion for Native Americans and clearly states that
laws passed for other purposes are not meant to restrict the rights of
Native Americans. The Morton policy statement provides Native Americans
protection from Federal prosecution, harassment, or other interference
for their possession, transport, use, donation, exchange, or loan of
the feathers of federally protected species without compensation. The
Morton policy statement also protects Native Americans who wish to
possess bird parts and/or feathers to be worked on by tribal craftsmen
for eventual use in religious/spiritual activities and allows the
transfer of parts and/or feathers to tribal craftsmen without charge.
Our 1994 Native American Policy states that we must expedite
processing and distribution of animal parts to Native Americans.
Between 1990 and 2000, our National Eagle Repository distributed eagle
parts and feathers to enrolled tribal members. Regulations governing
permits for use of eagle parts and feathers are in 50 CFR Part 22. The
Repository also distributed migratory bird parts and feathers from
birds other than eagles to enrolled tribes. We conducted this
distribution on an ad-hoc basis under the authority of 50 CFR 21.27,
Special Purpose Permits, with no criteria or conditions specific to
Native American religious or spiritual use. In 1999, we temporarily
suspended distribution of non-eagle feathers, due to administrative
resource constraints. We now intend to prepare an environmental
assessment for a possible proposed regulation for the legal acquisition
by Native Americans of non-eagle feathers for religious/spiritual use.
Environmental Assessment
We intend to prepare an assessment in order to analyze the
potential impacts of various alternatives for establishing a legal
mechanism for the acquisition of non-eagle feathers by Native Americans
for religious/spiritual purposes. We will assess potential impacts on
the natural and human environment that may result from different
alternatives for legalizing the acquisition of these feathers,
including impacts to Native American culture and religion. We
particularly solicit comments on the following topics (most of these
are discussed further following the list):
(1) The source(s) of the parts and feathers that we would make
available;
(2) What criteria or conditions we should establish for individuals
to be eligible to receive the migratory bird parts and feathers;
(3) How different means of legal acquisition may affect Native
American tribes;
(4) How Native American tribes could be affected if we extend such
authorization to other persons in addition to enrolled members of
federally recognized Native American tribes;
(5) The extent of Native American demand for the parts and
feathers;
(6) Whether the types of feathers being requested should be limited
to those historically significant to the tribe acquiring them;
(7) Which species of migratory birds are most valuable for Native
American religious/spiritual purposes;
(8) Potential impacts to migratory bird populations and other
wildlife; and
(9) Other concerns the public may have related to this initiative.
Further discussion of selected items from above list follows:
(1) Sources. The sources of the parts and feathers to be made
available is one of the primary concerns of this notice. The merits of
centralized availability, such as the National Eagle Repository, versus
decentralized availability, the extent to which tribes will have access
and input into the source availability and eventual acquisition, and
the various avenues for acquiring the feathers and parts are issues
upon which we seek comments, suggestions, and guidance from interested
parties.
(2) Eligibility. The MBTA, unlike the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668a), does not provide for possession of
migratory birds for religious/spiritual purposes by Native American
tribes, regardless of whether or not they are members of recognized
tribes. However, we have traditionally limited access to migratory
birds and their parts to enrolled members of recognized tribes. We seek
input on the potential impacts of providing legal access to non-eagle
feathers for religious/spiritual use to individuals other than enrolled
members of recognized tribes, including impacts to enrolled tribal
members, members of non-recognized tribes, or other affected parties.
(3) Means. We will look favorably upon methods that involve
decentralized availability and recognize tribal autonomy. We seek a
solution that will uphold the MBTA without placing a burden on our
resources.
(4) Demand. We seek input, suggestions, and comments on possible
uses, the frequency and pervasiveness of these uses, and an estimation
of the
[[Page 33190]]
demand upon the resource for these uses.
(5) Wildlife Population and Habitat Impacts. We do not expect to
authorize any means of acquisition that would affect migratory bird or
wildlife populations or impact wildlife habitat. We do not anticipate
take from the wild of live birds through hunting or any other method.
However, we seek input, comments, and suggestions on this issue.
Authority: The authorities for this notice are the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. 703-712), and the
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668a).
Dated: May 29, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7-11559 Filed 6-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P