Draft Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina), 32857-32858 [E7-11492]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
Total Estimated Burden Hours: 6,250.
Status: Extension of a currently
collection.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as
amended.
Dated: June 8, 2007.
Lillian L. Deitzer,
Departmental Paperwork Reduction Act
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–11430 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Draft Recovery Plan for the Northern
Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis
caurina)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce a 60-day
extension of the comment period for the
Draft Recovery Plan for the Northern
Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina)
(northern spotted owl).
DATES: Comments on the draft recovery
plan must now be received on or before
August 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the plan can
be sent electronically to
NSOplan@fws.gov, or mailed to NSO
Recovery Plan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ecological Services, 911 NE
11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232.
Copies of the draft recovery plan will be
available by request from the same
Portland address (telephone: 503–231–
2194). An electronic copy of the draft
recovery plan is also available at https://
www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/
endangered/recovery/plans.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Phifer, Northern Spotted Owl Recovery
Plan Project Manager, at the Portland
address identified above (telephone
503–724–1886, fax 503–231–2050).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Background
Restoring endangered or threatened
animals and plants to the point where
they are again secure, self-sustaining
members of their ecosystems is a
primary goal of our endangered species
program. The Endangered Species Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (ESA) requires
the development of recovery plans for
listed species unless such a plan would
not promote the conservation of a
particular species. Recovery plans help
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
guide the recovery effort by describing
actions considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establishing
criteria for downlisting or delisting
listed species, and estimating time and
cost for implementing the measures
needed for recovery.
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires that
public notice, and an opportunity for
public review and comment, be
provided during recovery plan
development. We will consider all
information presented during the public
comment period. Substantive comments
on the recovery needs of the species or
other aspects of recovery plan
development may result in changes to
the recovery plan. Substantive
comments regarding recovery plan
implementation may not necessarily
result in changes to the recovery plan,
but will be forwarded to appropriate
Federal agencies or other entities so that
they can take these comments into
account during the course of
implementing recovery actions.
Individual responses to comments will
not be provided.
The northern spotted owl inhabits
structurally complex forests from
southwest British Columbia through the
Cascade Mountains and coastal ranges
in Washington, Oregon, and California,
as far south as Marin County. When the
northern spotted owl was listed under
the ESA as a threatened species on June
26, 1990, the major threats were
identified as widespread loss and
adverse modification of suitable habitat
across the owl’s entire range and the
inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms to conserve the owl.
Currently, populations of northern
spotted owls are declining, especially in
the northern parts of the species’ range.
Scientific research and monitoring
have reported that northern spotted
owls generally rely on older forested
habitats because such habitats contain
the structures and characteristics
required for nesting, roosting, and
foraging. Recent landscape-level studies
in several southern portions of the
northern spotted owl’s range suggest a
mosaic of forest conditions may result
in good northern spotted owl habitat,
though other studies have not reported
that finding.
The most important threat currently
facing the northern spotted owl is
believed to be competition with the
barred owl (Strix varia). Actions
associated with addressing the barred
owl threat were given the highest
recovery priority, meaning the action
‘‘must be taken to prevent extinction or
prevent the species from declining
irreversibly in the foreseeable future.’’
Other important threats to the northern
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32857
spotted owl continue to be loss of
habitat quality and quantity as a result
of past activities and disturbances, and
ongoing and projected loss of habitat as
a result of fire, logging and conversion
of habitat to other uses.
The draft recovery plan provides two
options for recovery, and we are seeking
public comment on the effectiveness of
both options to achieve recovery. Both
options are based on the same
underlying science, and contain
essentially the same recovery goal,
objectives, criteria, and actions. The
options differ in that option 1 identifies
(i.e., maps) the specific conservation
area boundaries in which most of the
recovery actions and criteria will be
targeted. Option 2 does not designate
specific conservation area boundaries,
rather it provides a ‘‘rule set’’ that will
help guide the Federal land
management agencies when undertaking
conservation actions for the northern
spotted owl. Both options rely on
Federal lands to provide the primary
contribution for northern spotted owl
recovery.
The intent of providing two options
for public comment in a draft recovery
plan is to promote open public
discussion about how to successfully
recover this species.
Public Comments Solicited
We are soliciting written comments
on the draft recovery plan described. All
comments received by the date specified
above will be considered in the
finalization of this plan. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Comments and materials received
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at the above address.
We would specifically appreciate
comments on the following topics found
in both options:
• The methods used to determine
desired habitat percentages listed in
Recovery Criterion 4. If
recommendations are offered,
respondents are asked to explain the
scientific foundation supporting their
comments;
• The biological need, design and
feasibility of attempting to provide
connectivity between the Olympic
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
32858
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Notices
Peninsula and central Washington
northern spotted owl populations;
• The biological value in identifying
conservation areas in southwest
Washington and northwest Oregon;
• The practicality of Appendix E,
which provides examples of how a
salvage logging action (Recovery Action
22) may be implemented;
• The identified boundaries of the
Managed Owl Conservation Areas
(option 1 only) and the Conservation
Support Areas;
• Methods for managing the threat
posed by barred owls; and
• Ways to create incentives for
private land owners and managers to
support recovery of the northern spotted
owl.
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16
U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: May 25, 2007.
David J. Wesley,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E7–11492 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[WO–250–1231–EB–24 1A]
Submission to Office of Management
and Budget—Information Collection,
OMB Control Number 1004–0119
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has
submitted a request for an extension of
an approved information collection to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for approval.
DATES: The OMB is required to respond
to this request within 60 days but may
respond after 30 days. Submit your
comments to OMB at the address below
by July 16, 2007 to receive maximum
consideration.
Send comments to the
OMB, Interior Department Desk Officer
(1004–0119), at OMB–OIRA via e-mail
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov or via
facsimile at (202) 395–6566. Also please
send a copy of your comments to BLM
via Internet and include your name,
address, and ATTN: 1004–0119 in your
Internet message to
comments_washington@blm.gov or via
mail to: U.S. Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Land Management, Mail Stop
401LS, 1849 C Street, NW., ATTN:
Bureau Information Collection
Clearance Officer (WO–630),
Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may contact Shirlean Beshir to obtain
copies and explanatory material on this
information collection at (202) 452–
5033. Persons who use a
telecommunication device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) on 1–800–877–
8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, to contact Ms. Beshir.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
21, 2006, the BLM published a notice in
the Federal Register (71 FR 35696)
requesting comments on the information
collection. The comment period closed
on August 21, 2006. The BLM did not
receive any comments.
We are soliciting comments on the
following:
ADDRESSES:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
functioning of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of our estimates of
the information collection burden,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions we use;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the information
collection burden on those who are to
respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Title: Permits for Recreation on Public
Lands (43 CFR part 2930).
OMB Control Number: 1004–0119.
Abstract: The BLM manages the
recreation use program on public lands
according to the regulations at (43 CFR
part 2930). These regulations implement
the following statutes:
(1) The Land and Water Conservation
Fund Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 460l–
6a, (b), (g));
(2) The Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C.
1701(a)(8)), (43 U.S.C. 302(b)), and (43
U.S.C. 303);
(3) The Sentencing Reform Act (18
U.S.C. 3571); and
(4) 36 CFR part 71.
The BLM uses this information to
approve and collect fees for recreation
use on public lands.
Burden Estimate per Form: We
estimate the completion time for this
form and non-form information that is
submitted on occasion to the BLM by
individuals and the private sector as
follows:
Number of actions per year
Burden hours information collected
Burden hours
per action
Total annual
burden hours
(a) Special Recreation Application and Permit (Form 2930–1) and non-form information in 43
CFR subpart 2932 ....................................................................................................................
(b) 43 CFR subpart 2933; Non-form information to reserve a fee-use campground site, to collect recreation use fees, and obtain a recreation use permit ..................................................
1,450
8
11,600
364,395
1
364,395
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
365,845
........................
375,995
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Annual Responses: 365,845.
Application Fee per Response: 0.
Annual Burden Hours: 375,995.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
ACTION:
Bureau of Land Management
Dated: June 8, 2007.
Ted R. Hudson,
Bureau of Land Management, Acting Division
Chief Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 07–2934 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–M
Notice of public meeting.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Alaska
Resource Advisory Council will meet as
indicated below.
[AK–910–1310PP–ARAC]
Notice of Public Meeting, Alaska
Resource Advisory Council
Bureau of Land Management,
Alaska State Office, Interior.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 114 (Thursday, June 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32857-32858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11492]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Draft Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix
occidentalis caurina)
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce a 60-day
extension of the comment period for the Draft Recovery Plan for the
Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) (northern spotted
owl).
DATES: Comments on the draft recovery plan must now be received on or
before August 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the plan can be sent electronically to
NSOplan@fws.gov, or mailed to NSO Recovery Plan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ecological Services, 911 NE 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon
97232. Copies of the draft recovery plan will be available by request
from the same Portland address (telephone: 503-231-2194). An electronic
copy of the draft recovery plan is also available at https://
www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Phifer, Northern Spotted Owl
Recovery Plan Project Manager, at the Portland address identified above
(telephone 503-724-1886, fax 503-231-2050).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Restoring endangered or threatened animals and plants to the point
where they are again secure, self-sustaining members of their
ecosystems is a primary goal of our endangered species program. The
Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (ESA) requires the
development of recovery plans for listed species unless such a plan
would not promote the conservation of a particular species. Recovery
plans help guide the recovery effort by describing actions considered
necessary for the conservation of the species, establishing criteria
for downlisting or delisting listed species, and estimating time and
cost for implementing the measures needed for recovery.
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires that public notice, and an
opportunity for public review and comment, be provided during recovery
plan development. We will consider all information presented during the
public comment period. Substantive comments on the recovery needs of
the species or other aspects of recovery plan development may result in
changes to the recovery plan. Substantive comments regarding recovery
plan implementation may not necessarily result in changes to the
recovery plan, but will be forwarded to appropriate Federal agencies or
other entities so that they can take these comments into account during
the course of implementing recovery actions. Individual responses to
comments will not be provided.
The northern spotted owl inhabits structurally complex forests from
southwest British Columbia through the Cascade Mountains and coastal
ranges in Washington, Oregon, and California, as far south as Marin
County. When the northern spotted owl was listed under the ESA as a
threatened species on June 26, 1990, the major threats were identified
as widespread loss and adverse modification of suitable habitat across
the owl's entire range and the inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms to conserve the owl. Currently, populations of northern
spotted owls are declining, especially in the northern parts of the
species' range.
Scientific research and monitoring have reported that northern
spotted owls generally rely on older forested habitats because such
habitats contain the structures and characteristics required for
nesting, roosting, and foraging. Recent landscape-level studies in
several southern portions of the northern spotted owl's range suggest a
mosaic of forest conditions may result in good northern spotted owl
habitat, though other studies have not reported that finding.
The most important threat currently facing the northern spotted owl
is believed to be competition with the barred owl (Strix varia).
Actions associated with addressing the barred owl threat were given the
highest recovery priority, meaning the action ``must be taken to
prevent extinction or prevent the species from declining irreversibly
in the foreseeable future.'' Other important threats to the northern
spotted owl continue to be loss of habitat quality and quantity as a
result of past activities and disturbances, and ongoing and projected
loss of habitat as a result of fire, logging and conversion of habitat
to other uses.
The draft recovery plan provides two options for recovery, and we
are seeking public comment on the effectiveness of both options to
achieve recovery. Both options are based on the same underlying
science, and contain essentially the same recovery goal, objectives,
criteria, and actions. The options differ in that option 1 identifies
(i.e., maps) the specific conservation area boundaries in which most of
the recovery actions and criteria will be targeted. Option 2 does not
designate specific conservation area boundaries, rather it provides a
``rule set'' that will help guide the Federal land management agencies
when undertaking conservation actions for the northern spotted owl.
Both options rely on Federal lands to provide the primary contribution
for northern spotted owl recovery.
The intent of providing two options for public comment in a draft
recovery plan is to promote open public discussion about how to
successfully recover this species.
Public Comments Solicited
We are soliciting written comments on the draft recovery plan
described. All comments received by the date specified above will be
considered in the finalization of this plan. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire
comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made
publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Comments and materials
received will be available for public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours at the above address.
We would specifically appreciate comments on the following topics
found in both options:
The methods used to determine desired habitat percentages
listed in Recovery Criterion 4. If recommendations are offered,
respondents are asked to explain the scientific foundation supporting
their comments;
The biological need, design and feasibility of attempting
to provide connectivity between the Olympic
[[Page 32858]]
Peninsula and central Washington northern spotted owl populations;
The biological value in identifying conservation areas in
southwest Washington and northwest Oregon;
The practicality of Appendix E, which provides examples of
how a salvage logging action (Recovery Action 22) may be implemented;
The identified boundaries of the Managed Owl Conservation
Areas (option 1 only) and the Conservation Support Areas;
Methods for managing the threat posed by barred owls; and
Ways to create incentives for private land owners and
managers to support recovery of the northern spotted owl.
Authority
The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the Endangered
Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: May 25, 2007.
David J. Wesley,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E7-11492 Filed 6-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P