Built-in Gains and Losses Under Section 382(h), 32792-32794 [E7-11438]
Download as PDF
32792
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Washington, DC on June 1, 2007.
James J. Ballough,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me, Title 14, Code of
Federal regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part
97, is amended by amending Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures,
effective at 0901 UTC on the dates
specified, as follows:
I
or TACAN; § 97.25 LOC, LOC/DME,
LDA, LDA/DME, LDA w/GS, SDF, SDF/
DME; § 97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; § 97.29
ILS, MLS, TLS, GLS, WAAS PA, MLS/
RNAV; § 97.31 RADAR SIAPs; § 97.33
RNAV SIAPs; § 97.35 COPTER SIAPs,
§ 97.37 Takeoff Minima and Obstacle
Departure Procedures. Identified as
follows:
PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT
APPROACH PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 97
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106,
40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701,
44719, 44721–44722.
2. Part 97 is amended to read as
follows:
By amending: § 97.23 VOR, VOR/
DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME
I
* * * Effective Upon Publication
FDC date
State
City
Airport
5/22/07 .........
NY ...
MONTAUK ................
MONTAUK ..............................................
7/1798
5/23/07 .........
MD ..
BALTIMORE ..............
7/2223
5/23/07
5/23/07
5/23/07
5/23/07
5/23/07
VT
PA
TN
TN
PA
SPRINGFIELD ...........
KUTZTOWN ..............
KNOXVILLE ..............
KNOXVILLE ..............
POTTSTOWN ............
BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON
INTL
THURGOOD MARSHALL.
HARTNESS STATE (SPRINGFIELD) ....
KUTZTOWN ............................................
MCGHEE-TYSON ...................................
MCGHEE-TYSON ...................................
POTTSTOWN LIMERICK .......................
TAKEOFF MINIMS AND OBSTACLE
DP, AMDT 2.
RNAV (GPS) RWY 33L, ORIG–A.
7/2224
7/2225
7/2226
7/2227
7/2228
NDB A, AMDT 6.
VOR A, AMDT 1A.
NDB RWY 5R, AMDT 5.
ILS OR LOC RWY 5L, AMDT 8.
VOR/DME A, AMDT 3.
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
...
...
...
...
...
[FR Doc. E7–11144 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am]
Background
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Section 382
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9330]
RIN 1545–BG66
Built-in Gains and Losses Under
Section 382(h)
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Temporary regulations.
AGENCY:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
FDC No.
SUMMARY: This document contains
temporary regulations that apply to
corporations that have undergone
ownership changes within the meaning
of section 382. These regulations
provide guidance regarding the
treatment of prepaid income under the
built-in gain provisions of section
382(h). The text of these temporary
regulations also serves as the text of the
proposed regulations set forth in the
notice of proposed rulemaking on this
subject in the Proposed Rules section in
this issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on June 14, 2007.
Applicability Date: For dates of
applicability, see § 1.382–7T(b).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith Stanley at (202) 622–7750 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Section 382 limits, after a more than
50 percent change in stock ownership
(ownership change), the amount of a
loss corporation’s taxable income for
any post-change year that may be offset
by pre-change losses. The amount of the
limitation each year is equal to the
product of the fair market value of all
the stock of the loss corporation
immediately before the ownership
change multiplied by the applicable
long-term tax-exempt rate (section 382
limitation).
Section 382(h)(1)(A) provides that if
the loss corporation has a net unrealized
built-in gain (NUBIG), the section 382
limitation for any taxable year ending
within a 5-year recognition period is
increased by the recognized built-in
gain (RBIG) for the taxable year, subject
to the NUBIG limitation. Section
382(h)(2)(A) defines RBIG as any gain
recognized during the 5-year recognition
period on the disposition of any asset to
the extent the loss corporation
establishes that (i) It held the asset on
the change date and (ii) such gain does
not exceed the asset’s built-in gain on
the change date. Section 382(h)(6)(A)
also treats as RBIG any item of income
‘‘properly taken into account during the
recognition period’’ if the item is
‘‘attributable to periods before the
change date.’’
In Notice 2003–65 (2003–2 CB 747),
the IRS provided interim guidance
regarding the identification of built-in
gains and losses under section 382(h).
The Notice provides, among other
things, that a loss corporation may use
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Subject
the 338 approach in determining the
amount of its RBIG or recognized builtin loss (RBIL) for purposes of section
382(h). The 338 approach identifies
items of RBIG and RBIL generally by
comparing the loss corporation’s actual
items of income, gain, deduction, and
loss with those that would have resulted
if a section 338 election had been made
with respect to a hypothetical purchase
of all of the outstanding stock of the loss
corporation on the change date.
Prepaid Income
Generally, a taxpayer, including an
accrual method taxpayer that receives
payments in advance of performance,
must include the payments in gross
income in the taxable year of receipt
without regard to whether the required
performance has occurred. In Schlude v.
Commissioner, 372 U.S. 128 (1963), the
Supreme Court held that advance
payments for dance lessons were
includable in gross income when
received because the payments were
nonrefundable and the services were
provided on demand of the student. In
American Automobile Association v.
United States, 367 U.S. 687 (1961), the
Supreme Court held that membership
dues entitling members to emergency
road assistance and trip-planning
services were includable in gross
income when received, even though the
taxpayer’s method reflected income in
accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (which generally
operate to defer income recognition
until the item is economically earned).
However, courts have allowed the
deferral of prepaid income in limited
circumstances. In Artnell Co. v.
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Commissioner, 400 F. 2d 981 (7th Cir.
1968), the court held that amounts
received on advance ticket sales relating
to major league baseball games to be
played on fixed dates in the next year
could be deferred to that year. In Tampa
Bay Devil Rays, Ltd. v. Commissioner,
T.C. Memo 2002–248, the Tax Court
held that deposits received by a new
baseball franchise (Devil Rays) in 1995
and 1996 on advance season tickets for
major league baseball games to be
played by the Devil Rays in its first
season in 1998 could be deferred until
1998, even though the deferral period
was greater than a year. The Tax Court
emphasized that the games were to be
played on a fixed and definite schedule
in 1998 and that deferral more clearly
matched the deposits with the related
expenses that were incurred and
deducted in 1998.
Congress, the IRS, and Treasury
Department have allowed deferral of
prepaid income in certain
circumstances. For example, section 455
allows taxpayers that have prepaid
subscription income for newspapers,
magazines, and other periodicals to
elect to defer such income to the taxable
years during which the liability to
furnish or deliver the newspaper,
magazine, or periodical exists. Section
1.451–5(b)(1)(ii) allows advance
payments for the sale of goods to be
deferred to the year the payments are
included in gross receipts under the
taxpayer’s method of accounting for tax
purposes (such as when the goods are
shipped or delivered), unless the
income is recorded earlier for purposes
of the taxpayer’s financial statements.
For goods that must be inventoried the
permitted deferral is further limited by
§ 1.451–5(c)(1) to the second year
following the year substantial advance
payments, as defined in § 1.451–5(c)(3),
are received.
Revenue Procedure 71–21 (1971–2 CB
549), which was modified and
superseded by Rev. Proc. 2004–34
(2004–1 CB 991), allowed accrual
method taxpayers that received a
payment in one taxable year for services
to be performed before the end of the
next succeeding taxable year to defer
income inclusion until the services were
performed (but no later than the end of
the succeeding taxable year). The stated
purpose of the Revenue Procedure was
to reconcile the tax accounting
treatment of such payments with the
financial accounting conventions
consistently used by accrual method
taxpayers in the treatment of such
payments. Rev. Proc. 2004–34 allows a
qualifying taxpayer to defer advance
payments for services (and for certain
non-services and combinations of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
services and non-services) to the taxable
year succeeding the taxable year of
receipt to the extent the taxpayer
establishes that the advance payments
are not recognized in revenues in the
taxpayer’s applicable financial
statement in the taxable year of receipt;
or, if the taxpayer does not have an
applicable financial statement, the
payment is not earned in the taxable
year of receipt.
The common purpose of the prepaid
income deferral provisions described
above is to better match the taxpayer’s
income with the expenses incurred to
earn that income and, as a result, to
more clearly reflect the taxpayer’s
income both in the year of receipt and
in the year of performance.
Certain taxpayers are taking the
position that prepaid income received
in the period before the change date
(pre-change period) but included in
gross income in the recognition period
is RBIG. As further explained below, the
IRS and Treasury Department believe
that prepaid income is attributable to
the period on or after the change date
(post-change period) rather than the prechange period. Thus, treating prepaid
income as RBIG is inconsistent with the
purposes of section 382(h).
Explanation of Provisions
This temporary regulation provides
that prepaid income is not recognized
built-in gain. The term prepaid income
means any amount received prior to the
change date that is attributable to
performance occurring on or after the
change date. Examples to which the
temporary regulation applies include,
but are not limited to, income received
prior to the change date that is deferred
under section 455, § 1.451–5, or Rev.
Proc. 2004–34 (or any successor revenue
procedure).
The IRS and Treasury Department
believe that the section 382 legislative
history, through the examples set forth
therein, supports the position that
prepaid income should not be treated as
RBIG for section 382 purposes. The
House and Senate Committee Reports
that accompanied the enactment of
section 382(h)(6)(A) both state that
items of income attributable to the prechange period include accounts
receivable of a cash basis taxpayer that
arose before the change date and are
collected after that date, the gain on
completion of a long-term contract
performed by a taxpayer using the
completed contract method of
accounting that is attributable to the
pre-change period, and the recognition
of income attributable to the pre-change
period pursuant to section 481
adjustments, as when the loss
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32793
corporation is required to change to the
accrual method. See H. Rep. No. 100–
795, 46 (1988); S. Rep. No. 100–445, 48
(1988).
The IRS and Treasury Department
believe that prepaid income is
distinguishable from the income items
described in the committee report
examples. In each of the committee
report examples, the item of income is
attributable to the pre-change period
because that is the period in which
performance occurred and expenses
were incurred to earn the income. By
contrast, prepaid income is attributable
to the post-change period because that
is the period in which performance
occurred and expenses were incurred to
earn the income. Therefore, because
prepaid income is attributable to the
post-change period rather than the prechange period, the IRS and Treasury
Department have determined that such
prepaid income should not be treated as
RBIG under section 382(h).
The 338 approach described in Notice
2003–65 hereinafter will be applied
consistently with this temporary
regulation.
Comments
The text of these temporary
regulations also serves as the text of the
proposed regulations set forth in the
notice of proposed rulemaking on this
subject in the Proposed Rules section in
this issue of the Federal Register. Please
see the ‘‘Comments and Requests for a
Public Hearing’’ section of the notice of
proposed rulemaking for the procedures
to follow in submitting comments on
the proposed regulations on this subject.
In preparing comments on the
proposed regulations, please consider
the following. In Notice 2003–65,
comments were requested regarding the
different approaches, including the 338
approach, set forth for determining
RBIG and RBIL under section 382(h).
The IRS and Treasury Department
believe the 338 approach, in most cases,
will properly identify whether or not an
item of income or deduction is treated
as RBIG or RBIL. However, the IRS and
Treasury Department are concerned that
taking items of income and deduction
into account separately may cause the
338 approach, in some cases, to not
properly identify whether or not an item
of income or deduction is treated as
RBIG or RBIL. The purpose of section
382(h)(6) is to treat items of income or
deduction in similar fashion to gain and
loss under section 382(h)(2). However,
under general tax principles, there is a
fundamental difference between the
treatment of items of income or
deduction and items of gain or loss. On
the one hand, under section 382(h)(2),
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
32794
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 114 / Thursday, June 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
which incorporates the principles of
section 1001, gain or loss on the
disposition of an asset is taken into
account net of the taxpayer’s basis, or
investment, in the assets. In contrast,
under section 382(h)(6), an item of
income is generally a gross amount that
is not netted and therefore not
necessarily matched with the item of
deduction incurred to earn the item of
income.
Therefore, the IRS and Treasury
Department request comments on the
proposed regulations about identifying
cases where taking into account items of
income and deduction separately may
cause the 338 approach to not properly
identify whether or not an item of
income or deduction is treated as RBIG
or RBIL, and how the 338 approach
might be adapted so that in such cases
it properly identifies whether or not an
item of income or deduction is treated
as RBIG or RBIL.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12666. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required.
These temporary regulations address
situations in which taxpayers
inappropriately attempt to treat deferred
prepaid income as net unrealized builtin gain for purposes of increasing the
amount of post-ownership change
income that may be offset by preownership change losses. For this
reason, it has been determined pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) that prior notice
and public procedure are impracticable
and contrary to the public interest. For
the same reason, it has been determined
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) that good
cause exists to make these temporary
regulations effective upon the date of
publication. For applicability of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) refer to the Special Analyses
section of the preamble to the crossreference notice of the proposed
rulemaking published in the Proposed
Rules section in this issue of the Federal
Register. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of
the Code, these temporary regulations
will be submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on their
impact on small business.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
IRS revenue rulings, procedures, and
notices cited in this preamble are made
available by the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC 20402.
Internal Revenue Service
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
RIN 1545–BF26
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Guidance Necessary To Facilitate
Business Electronic Filing and Burden
Reduction
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
I
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by adding an entry
in numerical order to read as follows:
I
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805. * * *
Section 1.382–7T also issued under 26
U.S.C. 382(m).* * *
I Par. 2. Section 1.382–7T is added to
read as follows:
§ 1.382–7T Built-in gains and losses
(temporary).
(a) Treatment of prepaid income. For
purposes of section 382(h), prepaid
income is not recognized built-in gain.
The term prepaid income means any
amount received prior to the change
date that is attributable to performance
occurring on or after the change date.
Examples to which this paragraph (a)
will apply include, but are not limited
to, income received prior to the change
date that is deferred under section 455,
§ 1.451–5, or Rev. Proc. 2004–34 (2004–
1 CB 991) (or any successor revenue
procedure) (see § 601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter).
(b) Effective/applicability date. (1)
This section applies to loss corporations
that have undergone an ownership
change on or after June 14, 2007.
(2) The applicability of this section
expires on or before June 14, 2010.
Kevin M. Brown,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Eric Solomon,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E7–11438 Filed 6–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
Drafting Information
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Availability of IRS Documents
The principal author of these
regulations is Sean McKeever, Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate).
However, other personnel from the IRS
and Treasury Department participated
in their development.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Jun 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26 CFR Parts 1, 301, and 602
[TD 9329]
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations and removal of
temporary regulations.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations that affect taxpayers filing
Federal income tax returns. They
simplify, clarify, or eliminate reporting
burdens and also eliminate regulatory
impediments to the electronic filing of
certain statements that taxpayers are
required to include on or with their
Federal income tax returns. This
document also makes conforming
changes to certain current regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on June 14, 2007.
Applicability Date: For dates of
applicability, see §§ 1.302–2(d), 1.302–
4(h), 1.331–1(f), 1.332–6(e), 1.338–10(c),
1.351–3(f), 1.355–5(e), 1.368–3(e),
1.381(b)–1(e), 1.382–8(j)(4), 1.382–11(b),
1.1081–11(f), 1.1221–2(j), 1.1502–13(m),
1.1502–31(j), 1.1502–32(j), 1.1502–33(k),
1.1502–95(g), 1.1563–3(e) and 1.6012–
2(k).
For
all sections except § 1.6012–2, Grid
Glyer, (202) 622–7930; for § 1.6012–2,
William T. Sullivan (202) 622–7052 (not
toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATON:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
contained in these final regulations has
been reviewed and approved by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)) under control number 1545–
2019.
The collection of information in these
final regulations is in §§ 1.302–2, 1.302–
4, 1.331–1, 1.332–6, 1.338–10, 1.351–3,
1.355–5, 1.368–3, 1.381(b)–1, 1.382–8,
1.382–11, 1.1081–11, 1.1221–2, 1.1502–
13, 1.1502–31, 1.1502–32, 1.1502–33,
1.1502–95, 1.1563–3 and 1.6012–2. This
information is required to enable the
IRS to verify that a taxpayer is reporting
the correct amount of the fair market
value of any property (including stock)
received and the basis of any property
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 114 (Thursday, June 14, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32792-32794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11438]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9330]
RIN 1545-BG66
Built-in Gains and Losses Under Section 382(h)
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Temporary regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains temporary regulations that apply to
corporations that have undergone ownership changes within the meaning
of section 382. These regulations provide guidance regarding the
treatment of prepaid income under the built-in gain provisions of
section 382(h). The text of these temporary regulations also serves as
the text of the proposed regulations set forth in the notice of
proposed rulemaking on this subject in the Proposed Rules section in
this issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on June 14,
2007.
Applicability Date: For dates of applicability, see Sec. 1.382-
7T(b).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Stanley at (202) 622-7750 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 382
Section 382 limits, after a more than 50 percent change in stock
ownership (ownership change), the amount of a loss corporation's
taxable income for any post-change year that may be offset by pre-
change losses. The amount of the limitation each year is equal to the
product of the fair market value of all the stock of the loss
corporation immediately before the ownership change multiplied by the
applicable long-term tax-exempt rate (section 382 limitation).
Section 382(h)(1)(A) provides that if the loss corporation has a
net unrealized built-in gain (NUBIG), the section 382 limitation for
any taxable year ending within a 5-year recognition period is increased
by the recognized built-in gain (RBIG) for the taxable year, subject to
the NUBIG limitation. Section 382(h)(2)(A) defines RBIG as any gain
recognized during the 5-year recognition period on the disposition of
any asset to the extent the loss corporation establishes that (i) It
held the asset on the change date and (ii) such gain does not exceed
the asset's built-in gain on the change date. Section 382(h)(6)(A) also
treats as RBIG any item of income ``properly taken into account during
the recognition period'' if the item is ``attributable to periods
before the change date.''
In Notice 2003-65 (2003-2 CB 747), the IRS provided interim
guidance regarding the identification of built-in gains and losses
under section 382(h). The Notice provides, among other things, that a
loss corporation may use the 338 approach in determining the amount of
its RBIG or recognized built-in loss (RBIL) for purposes of section
382(h). The 338 approach identifies items of RBIG and RBIL generally by
comparing the loss corporation's actual items of income, gain,
deduction, and loss with those that would have resulted if a section
338 election had been made with respect to a hypothetical purchase of
all of the outstanding stock of the loss corporation on the change
date.
Prepaid Income
Generally, a taxpayer, including an accrual method taxpayer that
receives payments in advance of performance, must include the payments
in gross income in the taxable year of receipt without regard to
whether the required performance has occurred. In Schlude v.
Commissioner, 372 U.S. 128 (1963), the Supreme Court held that advance
payments for dance lessons were includable in gross income when
received because the payments were nonrefundable and the services were
provided on demand of the student. In American Automobile Association
v. United States, 367 U.S. 687 (1961), the Supreme Court held that
membership dues entitling members to emergency road assistance and
trip-planning services were includable in gross income when received,
even though the taxpayer's method reflected income in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (which generally operate to
defer income recognition until the item is economically earned).
However, courts have allowed the deferral of prepaid income in
limited circumstances. In Artnell Co. v.
[[Page 32793]]
Commissioner, 400 F. 2d 981 (7th Cir. 1968), the court held that
amounts received on advance ticket sales relating to major league
baseball games to be played on fixed dates in the next year could be
deferred to that year. In Tampa Bay Devil Rays, Ltd. v. Commissioner,
T.C. Memo 2002-248, the Tax Court held that deposits received by a new
baseball franchise (Devil Rays) in 1995 and 1996 on advance season
tickets for major league baseball games to be played by the Devil Rays
in its first season in 1998 could be deferred until 1998, even though
the deferral period was greater than a year. The Tax Court emphasized
that the games were to be played on a fixed and definite schedule in
1998 and that deferral more clearly matched the deposits with the
related expenses that were incurred and deducted in 1998.
Congress, the IRS, and Treasury Department have allowed deferral of
prepaid income in certain circumstances. For example, section 455
allows taxpayers that have prepaid subscription income for newspapers,
magazines, and other periodicals to elect to defer such income to the
taxable years during which the liability to furnish or deliver the
newspaper, magazine, or periodical exists. Section 1.451-5(b)(1)(ii)
allows advance payments for the sale of goods to be deferred to the
year the payments are included in gross receipts under the taxpayer's
method of accounting for tax purposes (such as when the goods are
shipped or delivered), unless the income is recorded earlier for
purposes of the taxpayer's financial statements. For goods that must be
inventoried the permitted deferral is further limited by Sec. 1.451-
5(c)(1) to the second year following the year substantial advance
payments, as defined in Sec. 1.451-5(c)(3), are received.
Revenue Procedure 71-21 (1971-2 CB 549), which was modified and
superseded by Rev. Proc. 2004-34 (2004-1 CB 991), allowed accrual
method taxpayers that received a payment in one taxable year for
services to be performed before the end of the next succeeding taxable
year to defer income inclusion until the services were performed (but
no later than the end of the succeeding taxable year). The stated
purpose of the Revenue Procedure was to reconcile the tax accounting
treatment of such payments with the financial accounting conventions
consistently used by accrual method taxpayers in the treatment of such
payments. Rev. Proc. 2004-34 allows a qualifying taxpayer to defer
advance payments for services (and for certain non-services and
combinations of services and non-services) to the taxable year
succeeding the taxable year of receipt to the extent the taxpayer
establishes that the advance payments are not recognized in revenues in
the taxpayer's applicable financial statement in the taxable year of
receipt; or, if the taxpayer does not have an applicable financial
statement, the payment is not earned in the taxable year of receipt.
The common purpose of the prepaid income deferral provisions
described above is to better match the taxpayer's income with the
expenses incurred to earn that income and, as a result, to more clearly
reflect the taxpayer's income both in the year of receipt and in the
year of performance.
Certain taxpayers are taking the position that prepaid income
received in the period before the change date (pre-change period) but
included in gross income in the recognition period is RBIG. As further
explained below, the IRS and Treasury Department believe that prepaid
income is attributable to the period on or after the change date (post-
change period) rather than the pre-change period. Thus, treating
prepaid income as RBIG is inconsistent with the purposes of section
382(h).
Explanation of Provisions
This temporary regulation provides that prepaid income is not
recognized built-in gain. The term prepaid income means any amount
received prior to the change date that is attributable to performance
occurring on or after the change date. Examples to which the temporary
regulation applies include, but are not limited to, income received
prior to the change date that is deferred under section 455, Sec.
1.451-5, or Rev. Proc. 2004-34 (or any successor revenue procedure).
The IRS and Treasury Department believe that the section 382
legislative history, through the examples set forth therein, supports
the position that prepaid income should not be treated as RBIG for
section 382 purposes. The House and Senate Committee Reports that
accompanied the enactment of section 382(h)(6)(A) both state that items
of income attributable to the pre-change period include accounts
receivable of a cash basis taxpayer that arose before the change date
and are collected after that date, the gain on completion of a long-
term contract performed by a taxpayer using the completed contract
method of accounting that is attributable to the pre-change period, and
the recognition of income attributable to the pre-change period
pursuant to section 481 adjustments, as when the loss corporation is
required to change to the accrual method. See H. Rep. No. 100-795, 46
(1988); S. Rep. No. 100-445, 48 (1988).
The IRS and Treasury Department believe that prepaid income is
distinguishable from the income items described in the committee report
examples. In each of the committee report examples, the item of income
is attributable to the pre-change period because that is the period in
which performance occurred and expenses were incurred to earn the
income. By contrast, prepaid income is attributable to the post-change
period because that is the period in which performance occurred and
expenses were incurred to earn the income. Therefore, because prepaid
income is attributable to the post-change period rather than the pre-
change period, the IRS and Treasury Department have determined that
such prepaid income should not be treated as RBIG under section 382(h).
The 338 approach described in Notice 2003-65 hereinafter will be
applied consistently with this temporary regulation.
Comments
The text of these temporary regulations also serves as the text of
the proposed regulations set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking
on this subject in the Proposed Rules section in this issue of the
Federal Register. Please see the ``Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing'' section of the notice of proposed rulemaking for the
procedures to follow in submitting comments on the proposed regulations
on this subject.
In preparing comments on the proposed regulations, please consider
the following. In Notice 2003-65, comments were requested regarding the
different approaches, including the 338 approach, set forth for
determining RBIG and RBIL under section 382(h). The IRS and Treasury
Department believe the 338 approach, in most cases, will properly
identify whether or not an item of income or deduction is treated as
RBIG or RBIL. However, the IRS and Treasury Department are concerned
that taking items of income and deduction into account separately may
cause the 338 approach, in some cases, to not properly identify whether
or not an item of income or deduction is treated as RBIG or RBIL. The
purpose of section 382(h)(6) is to treat items of income or deduction
in similar fashion to gain and loss under section 382(h)(2). However,
under general tax principles, there is a fundamental difference between
the treatment of items of income or deduction and items of gain or
loss. On the one hand, under section 382(h)(2),
[[Page 32794]]
which incorporates the principles of section 1001, gain or loss on the
disposition of an asset is taken into account net of the taxpayer's
basis, or investment, in the assets. In contrast, under section
382(h)(6), an item of income is generally a gross amount that is not
netted and therefore not necessarily matched with the item of deduction
incurred to earn the item of income.
Therefore, the IRS and Treasury Department request comments on the
proposed regulations about identifying cases where taking into account
items of income and deduction separately may cause the 338 approach to
not properly identify whether or not an item of income or deduction is
treated as RBIG or RBIL, and how the 338 approach might be adapted so
that in such cases it properly identifies whether or not an item of
income or deduction is treated as RBIG or RBIL.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12666.
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. These temporary
regulations address situations in which taxpayers inappropriately
attempt to treat deferred prepaid income as net unrealized built-in
gain for purposes of increasing the amount of post-ownership change
income that may be offset by pre-ownership change losses. For this
reason, it has been determined pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) that
prior notice and public procedure are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest. For the same reason, it has been determined pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) that good cause exists to make these temporary
regulations effective upon the date of publication. For applicability
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) refer to the
Special Analyses section of the preamble to the cross-reference notice
of the proposed rulemaking published in the Proposed Rules section in
this issue of the Federal Register. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, these temporary regulations will be submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment
on their impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Sean McKeever, Office
of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). However, other personnel from
the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development.
Availability of IRS Documents
IRS revenue rulings, procedures, and notices cited in this preamble
are made available by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding an
entry in numerical order to read as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805. * * *
Section 1.382-7T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 382(m).* * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.382-7T is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.382-7T Built-in gains and losses (temporary).
(a) Treatment of prepaid income. For purposes of section 382(h),
prepaid income is not recognized built-in gain. The term prepaid income
means any amount received prior to the change date that is attributable
to performance occurring on or after the change date. Examples to which
this paragraph (a) will apply include, but are not limited to, income
received prior to the change date that is deferred under section 455,
Sec. 1.451-5, or Rev. Proc. 2004-34 (2004-1 CB 991) (or any successor
revenue procedure) (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter).
(b) Effective/applicability date. (1) This section applies to loss
corporations that have undergone an ownership change on or after June
14, 2007.
(2) The applicability of this section expires on or before June 14,
2010.
Kevin M. Brown,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Eric Solomon,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E7-11438 Filed 6-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P