Proposed Low Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Crown Enterprise Site, City of Rialto, County of San Bernardino, CA, 32305-32306 [E7-11314]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 12, 2007 / Notices
SUMMARY: We (Fish and Wildlife
Service) will ask the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
approve the information collection (IC)
described below. As required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
as part of our continuing efforts to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, we invite the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this IC. We
may not conduct or sponsor and a
person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before August 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments on the
IC to Hope Grey, Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife
Service, MS 222–ARLSQ, 4401 North
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203
(mail); hope_grey@fws.gov (e-mail); or
(703) 358–2269 (fax).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this IC, contact Hope Grey by mail, fax,
or e-mail (see ADDRESSES) or by
telephone at (703) 358–2482.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Electronic Duck Stamp Act of
2005 (Act) (Pub.L. 109-266), passed in
August 2006, requires that the Secretary
of the Interior conduct a 3–year pilot
program under which up to 15 States
authorized by the Secretary may issue
electronic Federal Duck Stamps. Eligible
applicants are State fish and wildlife
agencies that have an automated
licensing system authorized under State
law. There are currently 40 States that
offer Internet, point of sale, or
telephonic sales for their hunting and
fishing licenses.
Under the Act, a State may not
participate in the pilot program unless
it submits an application and the
Secretary approves it. OMB has granted
emergency approval for the application
for this program (FWS Form 3-2341) and
assigned OMB Control No. 1018-0135,
which expires October 31, 2007. To
participate in the pilot program, eligible
State fish and wildlife agencies must
have submitted an application by June
8, 2007. The application process will
lead to the selection of up to 15
participants for this pilot program.
The Act requires reports from States
that participate in the pilot program We
plan to ask OMB to approve the
following reporting requirements for a
3–year term:
(1) Pilot Fulfillment Report. Each
participating State must collect the
following information and submit it to
the fulfillment contractor on a weekly
basis. We will use this information to
issue an actual stamp to each purchaser.
(a) First and last name and complete
mailing address for each individual who
purchases an electronic stamp from the
State.
Number of annual
respondents
Activity
32305
(b) Face value amount of each
electronic stamp sold by the State.
(c) Amount of the Federal portion of
any fee required by the agreement for
each stamp sold.
(2) At the end of the pilot program,
the Act requires that we submit a report
to Congress. We will evaluate the
program to determine if it has provided
a cost effective and convenient means
for issuing Federal Duck Stamps. We
will ask each State to provide
information on whether or not the
program:
(a) Increased the availability of the
stamps.
(b) Assisted States in meeting
customer service objectives.
(c) Maintained actual stamps as an
effective and viable conservation tool.
(d) Maintained adequate retail
availability of the actual stamp.
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1018-0135.
Title: Electronic Duck Stamp Pilot
Program.
Service Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Revision of currently
approved collection.
Affected Public: State fish and
wildlife agencies.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: Weekly for
fulfillment reports; one time for
evaluation report.
Number of annual
responses
Completion time
per response
Annual burden
hours
15
15
780
15
1 hour ..............
8 hours ............
1,200
120
Totals ................................................................................
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Pilot Fulfillment Reports ...........................................................
Pilot Evaluation Report ............................................................
30
795
.....................
1,320
III. Request for Comments
We invite comments concerning this
IC on:
(1) whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
(3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include and/or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this IC. Before
including your address, phone number,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:38 Jun 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: April 30, 2007
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Fish and Wildlife Service.
FR Doc. E7–11286 Filed 6–11–07; 8:45 pm
Billing Code 4310–55–S
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Proposed Low Effect Habitat
Conservation Plan for the Crown
Enterprise Site, City of Rialto, County
of San Bernardino, CA
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Crown Enterprises (applicant)
has applied to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) for a 3-year
incidental take permit for one covered
species pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B)
of the Endangered Species Act of 1973,
as amended (Act). The application
addresses the potential for ‘‘take’’ of the
endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
32306
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 12, 2007 / Notices
fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus
abdominalis) associated with the
proposed commercial development on a
3.2-acre site in the City of Rialto, San
Bernardino County, California. A
conservation program to mitigate for the
project activities would be implemented
as described in the proposed 3.2-acre
Crown Enterprise Site, City of Rialto,
San Bernardino County, California Low
Effect Habitat Conservation Plan
(proposed HCP), which would be
implemented by the applicant.
We are requesting comments on the
permit application and on the
preliminary determination that the
proposed HCP qualifies as a ‘‘Loweffect’’ Habitat Conservation Plan,
eligible for a categorical exclusion under
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended. The basis
for this determination is discussed in
the Environmental Action Statement
(EAS) and the associated Low Effect
Screening Form, which are also
available for public review.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before July 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
addressed to the Field Supervisor, Fish
and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Fish and
Wildlife Office, 6010 Hidden Valley
Road, Carlsbad, California 92011.
Written comments may be sent by
facsimile to (760) 918–0638.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Karen Goebel, Assistant Field
Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office (see ADDRESSES); telephone: (760)
431–9440.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Availability of Documents
Individuals wishing copies of the
application, proposed HCP, and EAS
should immediately contact the Service
by telephone at (760) 431–9440 or by
letter to the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office. Copies of the proposed HCP and
EAS also are available for public
inspection during regular business
hours at the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office [see ADDRESSES].
Background
Section 9 of the Act and its
implementing Federal regulations
prohibit the take of animal species listed
as endangered or threatened. Take is
defined under the Act as to harass,
harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill,
trap, capture or collect listed animal
species, or attempt to engage in such
conduct (16 U.S.C. 1538). However,
under section 10(a) of the Act, the
Service may issue permits to authorize
incidental take of listed species.
‘‘Incidental take’’ is defined by the Act
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:38 Jun 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
as take that is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, carrying out an otherwise
lawful activity. Regulations governing
incidental take permits for threatened
and endangered species, respectively,
are found in the Code of Federal
Regulations at 50 CFR 17.22 and 50 CFR
17.32.
The applicant is seeking a permit for
take of the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly
during the life of the permit. This
species is referred to as the ‘‘DSF’’ in the
proposed HCP.
The applicant proposes to construct a
commercial development on 3.2 acres of
land located along the west side of
Riverside Avenue between Santa Ana
and Jurupa avenues in the City of Rialto,
San Bernardino County, California. We
anticipate that all DSF would be lost
within the project site. The project site
does not contain any other rare,
threatened or endangered species or
habitat. No critical habitat for any listed
species occurs on the project site.
The applicant proposes to mitigate the
effects to the DSF associated with the
covered activities by fully implementing
the HCP. The purpose of the proposed
HCP’s conservation program is to
promote the biological conservation of
the DSF. The applicant proposes to
mitigate impacts to the DSF through
purchase of 1 acre of credit within the
Colton Dunes Conservation Bank in the
City of Colton, San Bernardino County,
California.
The Proposed Action consists of the
issuance of an incidental take permit
and implementation of the proposed
HCP, which includes measures to
mitigate impacts of the project on the
DSF. One alternative to the taking of the
listed species under the Proposed
Action is considered in the proposed
HCP. Under the No Action Alternative,
no permit would be issued, and no
construction would occur.
The Service has made a preliminary
determination that approval of the
proposed HCP qualifies as a categorical
exclusion under NEPA, as provided by
the Department of the Interior Manual
(516 DM 2 Appendix 1 and 516 DM 6
Appendix 1) and as a ‘‘low-effect’’ plan
as defined by the Habitat Conservation
Planning Handbook (November 1996).
Determination of Low-effect Habitat
Conservation Plans is based on the
following three criteria: (1)
Implementation of the proposed HCP
would result in minor or negligible
effects on federally listed, proposed, and
candidate species and their habitats; (2)
Implementation of the proposed HCP
would result in minor or negligible
effects on other environmental values or
resources; and (3) Impacts of the
proposed HCP, considered together with
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the impacts of other past, present and
reasonably foreseeable similarly situated
projects, would not result, over time, in
cumulative effects to environmental
values or resources which would be
considered significant.
Based upon this preliminary
determination, we do not intend to
prepare further NEPA documentation.
We will consider public comments in
making the final determination on
whether to prepare such additional
documentation.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
This notice is provided pursuant to
section 10(c) of the Act. We will
evaluate the permit application, the
proposed HCP, and comments
submitted thereon to determine whether
the application meets the requirements
of section 10 (a) of the Act. If the
requirements are met, we will issue a
permit to the Crown Enterprises for the
incidental take of the Delhi Sands
flower-loving fly from the commercial
development in the City of Rialto, San
Bernardino County, California.
Dated: June 6, 2007.
Jim A. Bartel,
Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office, California/Nevada Operations,
Carlsbad, California.
[FR Doc. E7–11314 Filed 6–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Trempealeau National Wildlife Refuge,
Buffalo and Trempealeau Counties, WI
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental impact statement;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announces that a Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(CCP) and associated Environmental
Impact Statement are available for the
Trempealeau National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR). This notice is furnished in
compliance with our CCP policy to
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32305-32306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11314]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Proposed Low Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Crown
Enterprise Site, City of Rialto, County of San Bernardino, CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Crown Enterprises (applicant) has applied to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) for a 3-year incidental take permit for one
covered species pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The application addresses the
potential for ``take'' of the endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving
[[Page 32306]]
fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis) associated with the proposed
commercial development on a 3.2-acre site in the City of Rialto, San
Bernardino County, California. A conservation program to mitigate for
the project activities would be implemented as described in the
proposed 3.2-acre Crown Enterprise Site, City of Rialto, San Bernardino
County, California Low Effect Habitat Conservation Plan (proposed HCP),
which would be implemented by the applicant.
We are requesting comments on the permit application and on the
preliminary determination that the proposed HCP qualifies as a ``Low-
effect'' Habitat Conservation Plan, eligible for a categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969,
as amended. The basis for this determination is discussed in the
Environmental Action Statement (EAS) and the associated Low Effect
Screening Form, which are also available for public review.
DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to the Field Supervisor, Fish
and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, 6010 Hidden
Valley Road, Carlsbad, California 92011. Written comments may be sent
by facsimile to (760) 918-0638.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karen Goebel, Assistant Field
Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES);
telephone: (760) 431-9440.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Documents
Individuals wishing copies of the application, proposed HCP, and
EAS should immediately contact the Service by telephone at (760) 431-
9440 or by letter to the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office. Copies of
the proposed HCP and EAS also are available for public inspection
during regular business hours at the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office
[see ADDRESSES].
Background
Section 9 of the Act and its implementing Federal regulations
prohibit the take of animal species listed as endangered or threatened.
Take is defined under the Act as to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture or collect listed animal species, or attempt
to engage in such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1538). However, under section
10(a) of the Act, the Service may issue permits to authorize incidental
take of listed species. ``Incidental take'' is defined by the Act as
take that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an
otherwise lawful activity. Regulations governing incidental take
permits for threatened and endangered species, respectively, are found
in the Code of Federal Regulations at 50 CFR 17.22 and 50 CFR 17.32.
The applicant is seeking a permit for take of the Delhi Sands
flower-loving fly during the life of the permit. This species is
referred to as the ``DSF'' in the proposed HCP.
The applicant proposes to construct a commercial development on 3.2
acres of land located along the west side of Riverside Avenue between
Santa Ana and Jurupa avenues in the City of Rialto, San Bernardino
County, California. We anticipate that all DSF would be lost within the
project site. The project site does not contain any other rare,
threatened or endangered species or habitat. No critical habitat for
any listed species occurs on the project site.
The applicant proposes to mitigate the effects to the DSF
associated with the covered activities by fully implementing the HCP.
The purpose of the proposed HCP's conservation program is to promote
the biological conservation of the DSF. The applicant proposes to
mitigate impacts to the DSF through purchase of 1 acre of credit within
the Colton Dunes Conservation Bank in the City of Colton, San
Bernardino County, California.
The Proposed Action consists of the issuance of an incidental take
permit and implementation of the proposed HCP, which includes measures
to mitigate impacts of the project on the DSF. One alternative to the
taking of the listed species under the Proposed Action is considered in
the proposed HCP. Under the No Action Alternative, no permit would be
issued, and no construction would occur.
The Service has made a preliminary determination that approval of
the proposed HCP qualifies as a categorical exclusion under NEPA, as
provided by the Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM 2 Appendix 1
and 516 DM 6 Appendix 1) and as a ``low-effect'' plan as defined by the
Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook (November 1996). Determination
of Low-effect Habitat Conservation Plans is based on the following
three criteria: (1) Implementation of the proposed HCP would result in
minor or negligible effects on federally listed, proposed, and
candidate species and their habitats; (2) Implementation of the
proposed HCP would result in minor or negligible effects on other
environmental values or resources; and (3) Impacts of the proposed HCP,
considered together with the impacts of other past, present and
reasonably foreseeable similarly situated projects, would not result,
over time, in cumulative effects to environmental values or resources
which would be considered significant.
Based upon this preliminary determination, we do not intend to
prepare further NEPA documentation. We will consider public comments in
making the final determination on whether to prepare such additional
documentation.
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(c) of the Act. We
will evaluate the permit application, the proposed HCP, and comments
submitted thereon to determine whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10 (a) of the Act. If the requirements are met,
we will issue a permit to the Crown Enterprises for the incidental take
of the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly from the commercial development in
the City of Rialto, San Bernardino County, California.
Dated: June 6, 2007.
Jim A. Bartel,
Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, California/Nevada
Operations, Carlsbad, California.
[FR Doc. E7-11314 Filed 6-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P