Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request, 32081-32083 [E7-11149]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 111 / Monday, June 11, 2007 / Notices
imposing litigation costs on both the
private sector and the public sector, it
may be more efficient and is a proper
use of Section 4(c) exemptive authority
to permit, without compromising the
public interest, the products to trade on
both sides of the line and let
competitive forces determine which
venue is successful.
Second, the CDOs and CDBOs would
be entered into solely between
appropriate persons. This issue was
discussed by both CME and OCC in
their respective comment letters.
Section 4(c)(3) includes within the term
‘‘appropriate persons’’ a number of
specified categories of persons, but also
in subparagraph (K), ‘‘such other
persons that the Commission
determines to be appropriate in light of
* * * the applicability of appropriate
regulatory protections.’’ (Emphasis
added.) These products will be traded
on a regulated exchange. CBOE, OCC,
and their members who will
intermediate these transactions, are
subject to extensive and detailed
oversight by the SEC and, in the case of
the intermediaries, the securities selfregulatory organizations. It should be
noted that CME has listed or will list
comparable products and has not
limited access to its markets to specified
categories of persons. In light of where
the products will be traded, the
regulatory protections available under
the securities laws, and the goal of
promoting fair competition, these
products will be traded by appropriate
persons.
Third, the exemption would not have
a material adverse effect on the ability
of the Commission or any designated
contract market to carry out their
regulatory responsibilities under the
CEA. There is no reason to believe that
granting an exemption here would
interfere with the Commission’s or a
designated contract market’s ability to
oversee the trading of similar products
on a designated contract market or
otherwise to carry out their duties. None
of the comment letters received
addressed this issue.18
Therefore, upon due consideration,
pursuant to its authority under Section
4(c) of the CEA, the Commission hereby
rmajette on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
18 Under
Section 4(c) of the CEA, the Commission
need not resolve whether, as CME argues in its
comment letter, these products are based on
commodities and not securities, or, as CBOE argues
in its comment letter, these products are securities
subject to the securities laws. Nor need the
Commission determine, as CME urges, whether the
products are properly characterized as options.
Finally, the Commission notes that its references to
the novelty of the issues raised by these products
refer to issues under the CEA and were not
intended to be applicable in any matter relating to
patent or intellectual property law.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:15 Mar 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
issues this Order and exempts the
trading and clearing of CDOs and
CDBOs to be listed and traded on CBOE
and cleared through OCC as a securities
clearing agency from the CEA. This
Order is contingent upon the approval
by the SEC, pursuant to Section 19(b) of
the 1934 Act, of CBOE and OCC rules
to permit the listing and trading of
CDOs and CDBOs on CBOE. This Order
is subject to termination or revision, on
a prospective basis, if the Commission
determines upon further information
that this exemption is not consistent
with the public interest. If the
commission believes such exemption
becomes detrimental to the public
interest, the Commission may revoke
this Order on its own motion.
V. Related Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) 19 imposes certain requirements
on federal agencies (including the
Commission) in connection with their
conducting or sponsoring any collection
of information as defined by the PRA.
The order would not require a new
collection of information from any
entities that would be subject to the
order.
B. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Section 15(a) of the CEA, as amended
by Section 119 of the Commodity
Futures Modernization Act of 2000
(‘‘CFMA’’),20 requires the Commission to
consider the costs and benefits of its
action before issuing an order under the
CEA. By its terms, Section 15(a) as
amended does not require the
Commission to quantify the costs and
benefits of an order or to determine
whether the benefits of the order
outweigh its costs. Rather, Section 15(a)
simply requires the Commission to
‘‘consider the costs and benefits’’ of its
action.
Section 15(a) of the CEA further
specifies that costs and benefits shall be
evaluated in light of five broad areas of
market and public concern: protection
of market participants and the public;
efficiency, competitiveness, and
financial integrity of futures markets;
price discovery; sound risk management
practices; and other public interest
considerations. Accordingly, the
Commission could in its discretion give
greater weight to any one of the five
enumerated areas and could in its
discretion determine that,
notwithstanding its costs, a particular
order was necessary or appropriate to
protect the public interest or to
PO 00000
Fmt 4703
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 5, 2007
by the Commission.
Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07–2878 Filed 6–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–M
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
U.S.C. 3507(d).
U.S.C. 19(a).
Frm 00026
effectuate any of the provisions or to
accomplish any of the purposes of the
CEA.
The order issued today is expected to
facilitate market competition. The
commission has considered the costs
and benefits of the order in light of the
specific provisions of Section 15(a) of
the CEA, as follows:
1. Protection of market participants
and the public. Protections for market
participants and the public exist in that
CBOE, OCC and their members who will
intermediate CDOs and CDBOs are
subject to extensive oversight by the
SEC and, in the case of intermediaries,
securities self-regulatory organizations.
2. Efficiency, competition, and
financial integrity. The exemptive order
may enhance market efficiency and
competition since it could encourage
potential trading of CDOs and CDBOs
on markets other than designated
contract markets. Financial integrity
will not be impaired since the CDOs and
CDBOs will be cleared by OCC, a DCO
and SEC-registered clearing agency, and
intermediated by SEC-registered brokerdealers.
3. Price discovery. Price discovery
may be enhanced through market
competition.
4. Sound risk management practices.
OCC has described appropriate riskmanagement practices that it will follow
in connection with the clearing of CDOs
and CDBOs.
5. Other public interest
considerations. The exemptive order
may encourage development of credit
derivative products through market
competition without unnecessary
regulatory burden.
The Commission requested comment
on its application of these factors in the
proposing release. No comments were
received.
After considering these factors, the
Commission has determined to issue
this Order.
*
*
*
*
*
AGENCY:
19 44
20 7
32081
Sfmt 4703
E:\ERIC\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
32082
rmajette on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 111 / Monday, June 11, 2007 / Notices
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
and Community Service (hereinafter the
‘‘Corporation’’), as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
helps to ensure that requested data can
be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of collection requirement on
respondents can be properly assessed.
Currently, the Corporation is
soliciting comments concerning the
proposed information collection project:
‘‘Determining the Prevalence of
Disability Among Current Members in
the Corporation for National and
Community Service AmeriCorps
Programs.’’
Copies of the information collection
requests can be obtained by contacting
the office listed in the address section
of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the individual and office
listed in the ADDRESSES section by
August 10, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the title of the information
collection activity, by any of the
following methods:
(1) By mail sent to: Corporation for
National and Community Service; Office
of Leadership Development and
Training, 9th Floor, Attn: Jewel BazilioBellegarde, Sr. Training and Disability
Inclusion Officer, 1201 New York Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20525.
(2) By hand delivery or by courier to
the Corporation’s mailroom at Room
8102C at the mail address given in
paragraph (1) above, between 9 a.m. and
4 p.m. Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
(3) By fax to: 202–606–3477, attn:
Jewel Bazilio-Bellegarde, Sr. Training &
Disability Inclusion Officer, Corporation
for National and Community Service.
(4) Electronically through the
Corporation’s e-mail address system:
jbazilio@cns.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jewel Bazilio-Bellegarde, (202) 606–
6839, or by e-mail at jbazilio@cns.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Corporation is particularly interested in
comments that:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:15 Mar 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Corporation, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are expected to respond, including the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology
(e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses).
Background
The proposed project will pilot test a
survey which seeks to determine the
prevalence of disability among current
AmeriCorps members serving in
Corporation programs. By conducting
this pilot test, the Corporation seeks to
refine an instrument which can be used
in future research to track the
prevalence rate of persons with
disabilities serving as members. The
goals of the study are to: (1) Test and
refine a questionnaire which measures
the prevalence of disability; (2) produce
statistically reliable estimates for the
prevalence of disability among current
members in the Corporation’s three
AmeriCorps programs (AmeriCorps
National Civilian Conservation Corps
(NCCC); AmeriCorps State and National;
and AmeriCorps VISTA); (3) produce a
report for the Corporation on study
methodology and findings and for peerreviewed manuscripts, as appropriate.
The project involves a survey
administered under four experimental
conditions, to test response rates and
disability disclosure rates under
different modes of survey
administration. These conditions will
include: (1) Mail questionnaire only; (2)
e-mail only, with link to complete web
survey; (3) mailed letter with web
option only; and (4) both a mail
questionnaire and web option provided
in mailing.
Data collection for this effort will be
conducted in accordance with the
Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPPA) Privacy rule
with the Protection of Human Research
Subjects regulations, 45 CFR part 46. In
addition, data collected will only be
used for the above stated purposes and
identifiable data collected from
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
individuals in the study will be kept
confidential, using only aggregate leveldata in products or reports.
Current Action
This is an application for a new data
collection in support of a pilot study.
The pilot study will be conducted via
four experimental conditions to test the
impact of mode of survey
administration on both response rates
and rates of disability among the
Corporation’s three AmeriCorps service
programs. The sample will be drawn
from the Corporation’s master list of
74,689 current AmeriCorps members,
stratified by program, to include NCCC,
Americorps State and National, and
VISTA. We will draw a sample of 2,400
members, with an anticipated response
rate of 80 percent across all four
experimental conditions. Participation
in the survey will be voluntary and
there will be no monetary incentives
provided for participants.
The quantitative data collected
through the questionnaire will gather
information about members’ disability
status as it pertains to: learning
disabilities; ADD/ADHD; developmental
disabilities, cognitive limitations;
sensory; mobility; disabling chronic
health conditions; psychiatric/mental
health; communications; substance
abuse; traumatic brain injury; short
stature/little person; and perceptions of
disability from self or others. The
categorical response options will be
used to analyze these data and
determine how many respondents
report a disability of any kind, by
service program.
Type of Review: New Information
Collection.
Agency: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
Title: Determining the Prevalence of
Disability Among Current Members in
the Corporation for National and
Community Service AmeriCorps
Programs.
OMB Number: Not yet available—
application being submitted.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: Members in
AmeriCorps NCCC, AmeriCorps State
and National, and AmeriCorps Vista.
Total Respondents: 2400.
Frequency: One time.
Average Time per Response: Averages
8 minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 320
hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): None.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
E:\ERIC\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 111 / Monday, June 11, 2007 / Notices
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
Gretchen Van der Veer,
Director, Office of Leadership Development
and Training.
[FR Doc. E7–11149 Filed 6–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
rmajette on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
AGENCY: Department of Education
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management, invites
comments on the proposed information
collection requests as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before August
10, 2007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The IC Clearance
Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
12:15 Mar 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated: June 5, 2007.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
Type of Review: New.
Title: High School Equivalency
Program (HEP) Annual Performance
Report.
Frequency: Annually.
Affected Public: Not-for-profit
institutions; State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 61.
Burden Hours: 2,440.
Abstract: For the Migrant HEP
Program, a customized Annual
Performance Report (APR) that goes
beyond the generic 524B is requested to
facilitate the collection of more
standardized and comprehensive data to
inform Government Performance and
Results Act (GPRA), to improve the
overall quality of data collected, and to
increase the quality and quantity of data
that can be used to inform policy
decisions.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on link
number 3379. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington,
DC 20202–4700. Requests may also be
electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–
245–6623. Please specify the complete
title of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E7–11155 Filed 6–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32083
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act; Implementation; Single-Sex
Classes and Schools; Guidelines
Office for Civil Rights, U.S.
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Secretary of Education
gives notice that ‘‘Guidelines on current
title IX requirements related to singlesex classes and schools,’’ published in
the Federal Register on May 8, 2002 (67
FR 31102), for use by State educational
agencies (SEAs) and local educational
agencies (LEAs) in certain applications
for Innovative Programs funds, is
withdrawn. The Secretary also gives
notice that the new final regulations
implementing Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), which
prohibits sex discrimination in federally
assisted education programs and
activities, published in the Federal
Register on October 25, 2006 (71 FR
62530), which expand flexibility for
recipients to provide single-sex classes
and schools and include a preamble
explaining the requirements of these
new regulations, are deemed guidelines
on Title IX requirements for single-sex
classes and schools for the purposes of
the requirements of 20 U.S.C. 7215(c)
and 20 U.S.C. 7215b(b)(9) with respect
to applications for Innovative Programs
funds to support single-sex classes and
schools.
DATES: This notice is effective June 11,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra G. Battle, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 6125, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–1100.
Telephone: (202) 245–6767.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
1–877–521–2172. For additional copies
of this document, you may call the
Customer Service Team for the Office
for Civil Rights (OCR) at (202) 245–6800
or 1–800–421–3481.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
The No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB
Act) permits LEAs to use Innovative
Programs funds to support, among other
things, single-sex schools and classes
consistent with applicable law. 20
U.S.C. 7215(a)(23). In this regard the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\ERIC\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 111 (Monday, June 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32081-32083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11149]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request
AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.
[[Page 32082]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service
(hereinafter the ``Corporation''), as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance
consultation program to provide the general public and federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirement on respondents can be properly assessed.
Currently, the Corporation is soliciting comments concerning the
proposed information collection project: ``Determining the Prevalence
of Disability Among Current Members in the Corporation for National and
Community Service AmeriCorps Programs.''
Copies of the information collection requests can be obtained by
contacting the office listed in the address section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the individual and office
listed in the ADDRESSES section by August 10, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, by any of the following methods:
(1) By mail sent to: Corporation for National and Community
Service; Office of Leadership Development and Training, 9th Floor,
Attn: Jewel Bazilio-Bellegarde, Sr. Training and Disability Inclusion
Officer, 1201 New York Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20525.
(2) By hand delivery or by courier to the Corporation's mailroom at
Room 8102C at the mail address given in paragraph (1) above, between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
(3) By fax to: 202-606-3477, attn: Jewel Bazilio-Bellegarde, Sr.
Training & Disability Inclusion Officer, Corporation for National and
Community Service.
(4) Electronically through the Corporation's e-mail address system:
jbazilio@cns.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jewel Bazilio-Bellegarde, (202) 606-
6839, or by e-mail at jbazilio@cns.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Corporation is particularly interested
in comments that:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Corporation, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are expected to respond, including the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology (e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses).
Background
The proposed project will pilot test a survey which seeks to
determine the prevalence of disability among current AmeriCorps members
serving in Corporation programs. By conducting this pilot test, the
Corporation seeks to refine an instrument which can be used in future
research to track the prevalence rate of persons with disabilities
serving as members. The goals of the study are to: (1) Test and refine
a questionnaire which measures the prevalence of disability; (2)
produce statistically reliable estimates for the prevalence of
disability among current members in the Corporation's three AmeriCorps
programs (AmeriCorps National Civilian Conservation Corps (NCCC);
AmeriCorps State and National; and AmeriCorps VISTA); (3) produce a
report for the Corporation on study methodology and findings and for
peer-reviewed manuscripts, as appropriate.
The project involves a survey administered under four experimental
conditions, to test response rates and disability disclosure rates
under different modes of survey administration. These conditions will
include: (1) Mail questionnaire only; (2) e-mail only, with link to
complete web survey; (3) mailed letter with web option only; and (4)
both a mail questionnaire and web option provided in mailing.
Data collection for this effort will be conducted in accordance
with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA)
Privacy rule with the Protection of Human Research Subjects
regulations, 45 CFR part 46. In addition, data collected will only be
used for the above stated purposes and identifiable data collected from
individuals in the study will be kept confidential, using only
aggregate level-data in products or reports.
Current Action
This is an application for a new data collection in support of a
pilot study. The pilot study will be conducted via four experimental
conditions to test the impact of mode of survey administration on both
response rates and rates of disability among the Corporation's three
AmeriCorps service programs. The sample will be drawn from the
Corporation's master list of 74,689 current AmeriCorps members,
stratified by program, to include NCCC, Americorps State and National,
and VISTA. We will draw a sample of 2,400 members, with an anticipated
response rate of 80 percent across all four experimental conditions.
Participation in the survey will be voluntary and there will be no
monetary incentives provided for participants.
The quantitative data collected through the questionnaire will
gather information about members' disability status as it pertains to:
learning disabilities; ADD/ADHD; developmental disabilities, cognitive
limitations; sensory; mobility; disabling chronic health conditions;
psychiatric/mental health; communications; substance abuse; traumatic
brain injury; short stature/little person; and perceptions of
disability from self or others. The categorical response options will
be used to analyze these data and determine how many respondents report
a disability of any kind, by service program.
Type of Review: New Information Collection.
Agency: Corporation for National and Community Service.
Title: Determining the Prevalence of Disability Among Current
Members in the Corporation for National and Community Service
AmeriCorps Programs.
OMB Number: Not yet available--application being submitted.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: Members in AmeriCorps NCCC, AmeriCorps State and
National, and AmeriCorps Vista.
Total Respondents: 2400.
Frequency: One time.
Average Time per Response: Averages 8 minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 320 hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance): None.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or
[[Page 32083]]
included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval of
the information collection request; they will also become a matter of
public record.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
Gretchen Van der Veer,
Director, Office of Leadership Development and Training.
[FR Doc. E7-11149 Filed 6-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
