Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping; Montana Alberta Tie, Ltd., 31569-31571 [E7-11010]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
Creek estuary/lagoon, and numerous
ponds in the vicinity of Manchester,
California (including Davis Lake, Davis
Pond, Hunter’s Lagoon, and numerous
unnamed water bodies in the lower
Garcia River flood plain) in Mendocino
County; Gualala River, Salmon Creek
estuary/lagoon, and Estero Americano
in Sonoma County; Estero de San
Antonio, Walker Creek, Lagunitas Creek,
and Rodeo Lagoon in Marin County; San
Gregorio Creek estuary/lagoon,
Pescadero Lagoon (Pescadero Creek/
Butano Creek estuary/lagoon), and
Arroyo de los Frijoles estuary/lagoon in
San Mateo County; Laguna Creek
estuary/lagoon, Baldwin Creek estuary/
lagoon, Corcoran Lagoon, Aptos Creek
estuary/lagoon, and Pajaro River
estuary/lagoon in Santa Cruz County;
Bennett Slough in Monterey County;
Santa Paula Creek in Ventura County;
Cow Creek in Shasta County; Battle
Creek in Shasta and Tehama counties;
Butte Creek in Glenn and Butte
counties; Mokelumne River in
Sacramento and San Joaquin counties;
Sherman Island in Sacramento County;
Napa River in Napa County; Tuolumne
River in Stanislaus County; and Merced
River in Merced County.
Permit 1282 authorizes average
unintentional lethal take of juvenile
ESA-listed salmonids of approximately
2 percent of ESA-listed salmonids
captured. Permit 1282 does not
authorize lethal take of adult ESA-listed
salmonids or intentional lethal take of
ESA-listed salmonids. The purpose of
the research is to provide ESA-listed
salmonid population, distribution, and
habitat assessment data which will: (1)
contribute to the general body of
scientific knowledge pertaining to ESAlisted salmonids; (2) inform resource
managers to further the conservation
and recovery of ESA-listed salmonids;
and (3) evaluate the effectiveness of past
habitat restoration projects and guide
future habitat restoration projects to best
benefit ESA-listed salmonids. Permit
1282 expires on December 31, 2012.
Dated: May 30, 2007.
Angela Somma
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–10948 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Notice
United States Election
Assistance Commission.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Notice of Plenary
Teleconference Meeting for the
Technical Guidelines Development
Committee.
ACTION:
Tuesday, July 3, 2007,
11:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. EDT.
PLACE: National Institute of Standards
and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive,
Building 101, Gaithersburg, Maryland
20899–8900.
STATUS: This teleconference meeting
will be Web cast to the public.
Additional meeting information and
URL Web link for the event will be
available at https://vote.nist.gov. by June
19, 2007.
SUMMARY: The Technical Guidelines
Development Committee (the
‘‘Development Committee’’) has
scheduled a plenary teleconference
meeting for July 3, 2007. The
Development Committee was
established in 2004 to act in the public
interest to assist the Executive Director
of the U.S. Election Assistance
Comission (EAC) in the development of
voluntary voting system guidelines. The
Development Committee has held nine
previous plenary meetings. The
proceedings of these plenary sessions
are available at https://vote.nist.gov. The
purpose of the tenth meeting of the
Development Committee will be to
review and approve a final draft of
recommendations for future voluntary
voting system guidelines to the EAC.
The draft recommendations respond to
tasks defined in resolutions passed at
the previous Development Committee
meetings as well as a review of a
complete draft of recommendations
presented at the May 2007 plenary
meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Technical Guidelines Development
Committee (the ‘‘Development
Committee’’) has scheduled a plenary
teleconference meeting for July 3, 2007.
The Committee was established
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 15361, to act in
the public interest to assist the
Executive Director of the Election
Assistance Commission in the
development of the voluntary voting
system guidelines. The Technical
Guidelines Development Committee
held their first plenary meeting on July
9, 2004. At this meeting, the
Development Committee agreed to a
resolution forming three working
groups: (1) Human Factors & Privacy; (2)
Security & Transparency; and (3) Care
Requirements & Testing to gather
information and review preliminary
reports on issues pertinent to voluntary
voting standard recommendations. At
subsequent plenary sessions, additional
DATE AND TIME:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31569
resolutions were debated and adopted
by the TGDC. The resolutions define
technical work tasks for NIST that assist
the TGDC in developing
recommendations for voluntary voting
system guidelines. The Development
Committee approved initial
recommendations for voluntary voting
system guidelines at the April 20th &
21st, 2005 meeting. The
recommendation were formally
delivered to the EAC in May 2005 for
their review. In September of 2005, the
Development Committee began review
of preliminary technical reports for the
next iteration of voluntary voting system
guidelines. The Committee will review,
debate and approve a final draft of
recommendations of the next iteration
of voluntary voting system guidelines at
the July 3, 2007 teleconference meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allan Eustis 301–975–5099. If a member
of the public would like to submit
comments concerning the Committee’s
affairs at any time before or after the
meeting, written comments should be
addressed to the contact person
indicated above, c/o NIST, 100 Bureau
Drive, Mail Stop 8970, Gaithersburg,
MD 20899 or to voting@nist.gov.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance
Commission.
[FR Doc. 07–2839 Filed 6–4–07; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–M
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[OE Docket No. PP–305]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement and
Conduct Scoping; Montana Alberta
Tie, Ltd.
Department of Energy (DOE).
Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) announces its intention to
prepare an EIS and to conduct scoping
on the proposed Federal action of
granting a Presidential permit to
construct a new electric transmission
line across the U.S.-Canada border in
northwestern Montana. DOE has
determined that issuance of a
Presidential permit for the proposed
project would constitute a major Federal
action that may have a significant effect
upon the environment within the
meaning of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). For this
reason, DOE intends to prepare an EIS
entitled ‘‘The Montana Alberta Tie, Ltd.
(MATL) 230-kV Transmission Line
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
31570
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
Environmental Impact Statement’’
(DOE/EIS–0399) to address potential
environmental impacts from the
proposed action and the range of
reasonable alternatives. The EIS will be
prepared in compliance with NEPA and
applicable regulations, including DOE
NEPA implementing regulations at 10
CFR part 1021. Because of the previous
public participation activities, DOE does
not plan to conduct additional scoping
meetings for this EIS. Written comments
on the scope of the EIS are invited.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on the proposed project or
to receive a copy of the Draft EIS when
it is issued, contact Mrs. Ellen Russell,
Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability (OE–20), U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0350;
phone 202–586–9624, facsimile 202–
586–8008, or by electronic mail at
Ellen.Russell@hq.doe.gov. The MATL
Presidential permit application,
including associated maps and
drawings, can be downloaded in its
entirety from the DOE program Web site
at https://www.oe.energy.gov/permitting/
electricity_imports_exports.htm.
DOE invites interested agencies,
organizations, and members of the
public to submit comments or
suggestions to assist in identifying
significant environmental issues and in
determining the appropriate scope of
the EIS. The public scoping period starts
with the publication of this Notice in
the Federal Register and will continue
until July 9, 2007. DOE will consider all
comments received or postmarked by
July 9, 2007 in defining the scope of this
EIS.
ADDRESSES: Comments and suggestions
on the scope of the EIS should be
addressed to: Mrs. Ellen Russell, Office
of Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability (OE–20), U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0350; or by
electronic mail at
Ellen.Russell@hq.doe.gov.
DATES:
Executive
Order (E.O.) 10485, as amended by E.O.
12038, requires that a Presidential
permit be issued by DOE before electric
transmission facilities may be
constructed, operated, maintained, or
connected at the U.S. international
border. The E.O. provides that a
Presidential permit may be issued after
a finding that the proposed project is
consistent with the public interest and
after favorable recommendations from
the U.S. Departments of State and
Defense. In determining whether
issuance of a Presidential permit is in
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
the public interest, DOE considers the
environmental impacts of the proposed
project under NEPA, determines the
project’s impact on electric reliability
(including whether the proposed project
would adversely affect the operation of
the U.S. electric power supply system
under normal and contingency
conditions), and any other factors that
DOE may also consider relevant to the
public interest. The regulations
implementing the E.O. have been
codified at 10 CFR 205.320–205.329.
Issuance of a Presidential permit
indicates that there is no Federal
objection to the project, but does not
mandate that the project be completed.
MATL has applied to DOE’s Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability (OE) for a Presidential permit
to construct a 230,000-volt electric
transmission line across the U.S. border
with Canada, and to the State of
Montana Department of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ) for a Linear Facilities
construction permit. The proposed
transmission line would originate at a
new substation to be constructed
northeast of Lethbridge, Alberta,
Canada, cross the U.S.-Canada border,
and terminate north of Great Falls,
Montana, at an existing substation
owned by NorthWestern Energy. The
total length of the proposed
transmission line would be 203 miles,
with approximately 126 miles
constructed inside the United States.
DOE originally considered an
environmental assessment (EA) to be the
appropriate level of review under NEPA
and has been cooperating with the
MDEQ in the preparation of a single
environmental document that would
serve as both a Montana State EIS under
the Montana Environmental Policy Act
and a DOE EA under NEPA.
Identification of Environmental Issues
On November 18, 2005, DOE
published a ‘‘Notice of Intent to Prepare
an Environmental Assessment and to
Conduct Public Scoping Meetings and
Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands
Involvement; Montana Alberta Tie,
Ltd.’’ (70 FR 69962). That notice opened
a 45-day scoping period during which
the public was invited to participate in
the identification of potential
environmental impacts that may result
from construction of the MATL
transmission line project and reasonable
alternatives. DOE and MDEQ conducted
6 scoping meetings in the vicinity of the
proposed project. Ten issues and
concerns were identified as a result of
the initial scoping opportunity. These
issues and concerns are (1) impacts on
farming, ranching and other land uses,
(2) impacts on protected, threatened,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
endangered, or sensitive species of
animals or plants, or their critical
habitats, (3) impacts on floodplains and
wetlands, (4) avian mortality, (5)
impacts on cultural or historic
resources, (6) impacts on human health
and safety, (7) impacts on air, soil, and
water, (8) visual impacts, (9)
socioeconomic impacts, and (10)
impacts from development of wind
generation. An additional alternative
also was developed by the agencies to
address concerns raised by the public
and interested agencies during the
scoping period.
In March 2007, the MDEQ and DOE
published a draft document that was the
MDEQ Draft EIS and the DOE EA
(March 2007 EA). The document was
distributed for public comment and
three public hearings were conducted to
receive comments on the document
during a 55-day public comment period.
Based on comments received on the
March 2007 EA relating to land use and
potential effects on farming, DOE has
determined an EIS to be the proper
NEPA compliance document.
EIS Preparation and Schedule
In preparing the Draft EIS, DOE will
consider comments that DOE and the
State received at the 2005 scoping
meetings as well as the comments
received on the March 2007 EA. DOE is
working with the MDEQ to address the
comments received on the March 2007
EA and prepare responses to comments
which will be set forth in the Draft EIS.
Comments submitted on the March 2007
EA need not be resubmitted.
If the March 2007 EA does not require
significant modifications to address the
comments, DOE will issue, as the DOE
Draft EIS, a copy of the March 2007 EA
together with any corrections and
updated information as errata, and with
responses to comments. If extensive
modifications are required to adequately
address comments, DOE will issue as
the DOE Draft EIS a new document that
includes the responses to comments.
After DOE issues the Draft EIS, DOE will
then hold a public hearing and accept
public comment on the Draft EIS. DOE
will include all comments received on
the Draft EIS, and responses to those
comments, in the Final EIS.
DOE will provide a public comment
period of at least 45 days from the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA’s) Notice of Availability (NOA) of
the Draft EIS and will hold at least one
public hearing during the public
comment period. DOE may not issue a
record of decision sooner than 90 days
from EPA’s NOA of the Draft EIS and no
sooner than 30 days from EPA’s NOA of
the Final EIS.
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2007.
Kevin M. Kolevar,
Director, Office of Electricity Delivery and
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. E7–11010 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. 2007–OE–01, Draft Mid-Atlantic
Area National Corridor; Docket No. 2007–
OE–02, Draft Southwest Area National
Corridor]
Office of Electricity Delivery and
Energy Reliability; Draft National
Interest Electric Transmission Corridor
Designations
Department of Energy.
Notice of errata and meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) published notice of two draft
National Interest Electric Transmission
Corridors (National Corridors) under
section 216 of the Federal Power Act in
72 FR 25838 on May 7, 2007. With
regard to the draft Mid-Atlantic Area
National Corridor (Docket No. 2007–
OE–01), DOE is correcting an error in
the text of the May 7, 2007 notice. There
are six counties that were correctly
included in the map of the draft MidAtlantic Area National Corridor,
displayed in Figure VIII–21 at 72 FR
25908, but that were inadvertently
omitted from the narrative description
of the draft Corridor at 72 FR 25909. The
six counties that should have been
included in the list at 72 FR 25908 are:
Monroe County, OH; Carbon County,
PA; Cumberland County, PA; Kanawha
County, WV; Mason County, WV; and
Putnam County, WV. Further, DOE will
be holding four additional public
meetings on the draft National
Corridors.
DOE has scheduled two new
public meetings on Docket No. 2007–
OE–01 (the draft Mid-Atlantic Area
National Corridor) for the following
dates:
June 12, 2007, 1 p.m. to 7 p.m.,
Rochester, NY; and
June 13, 2007, 1 p.m. to 7 p.m.,
Pittsburgh, PA.
DOE has scheduled two new public
meetings on Docket No. 2007–OE–02
(the draft Southwest Area National
Corridor) for the following dates:
June 20, 2007, 1 p.m. to 7 p.m., Las
Vegas, NV; and
June 21, 2007, 1 p.m. to 7 p.m., Phoenix,
AZ.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
DATES:
The locations for the public
meetings are:
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Rochester, NY—RIT Inn & Conference
Center, 5257 West Henrietta Road,
West Henrietta, NY 14586;
Pittsburgh, PA—National Energy
Technology Laboratory, Building 922,
Conference Center A, B, & C, 626
Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA
15236 (All attendees will be required
to present valid government-issued
photo identification, such as a driver’s
license, passport, or military ID, upon
entrance to the National Energy
Technology Laboratory campus);
Las Vegas, NV—Atomic Testing
Museum, 755 East Flamingo Road,
Las Vegas, NV 89119; and
Phoenix, AZ—Crowne Plaza Hotel
Phoenix Airport, 4300 East
Washington, Phoenix, AZ 85034.
If you are interested in speaking at
one of these meetings, please sign up at
https://www.energetics.com/
NIETCpublicmeetings or call 410–953–
6250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information, David Meyer,
DOE Office of Electricity Delivery and
Energy Reliability, (202) 586–1411,
david.meyer@hq.doe.gov. For legal
information, Mary Morton, DOE Office
of the General Counsel, (202) 586–1221,
mary.morton@hq.doe.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2007.
Kevin M. Kolevar,
Director, Office of Electricity Delivery and
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. E7–11017 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. CP05–130–000, CP05–132–
000; Docket No. CP05–131–000]
Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP;
Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of
Availability of the Final Conformity
Determination for Pennsylvania,
Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and
New York—Cove Point Expansion
Project
June 1, 2007.
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared a Final
General Conformity Determination to
assess the potential air quality impacts
associated with the construction and
operation of a liquefied natural gas
(LNG) import terminal and natural gas
pipeline facilities proposed by
Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP and
Dominion Transmission, Incorporated
(Dominion), referred to as the Cove
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Point Expansion Project, in the abovereferenced docket.
This Final General Conformity
Determination was prepared to satisfy
the requirements of the Clean Air Act.
Additional information about the
project is available from the
Commission’s Office of External Affairs,
at 1–866–208–FERC or on the FERC
Internet Web site (https://www.ferc.gov)
using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ‘‘General Search’’
and enter the docket number excluding
the last three digits in the Docket
Number field. Be sure you have selected
an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
free at 1–866–208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–11000 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL07–66–000]
Invenergy Thermal LLC, Complainant,
v. ISO New England, Inc., Respondent.;
Notice of Complaint and Request for
Fast Track
June 1, 2007.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PO 00000
31571
Sfmt 4703
Take notice that on May 31, 2007,
Invenergy Thermal LLC (Invenergy)
filed a formal complaint against ISO
New England, Inc. (ISO–NE) pursuant to
section 206 of the Federal Power Act,
alleging that it was improper for ISO–
NE to disqualify Invenergy’s Sutton
Energy Project from being further
considered as a potential capacity
supplier in ISO–NE’s 2008 Forward
Capacity Market auction on the grounds
that Invenergy failed to post a
Qualification Deposit by February 20,
2007. Invenergy requests that the
Commission grant Invenergy a waiver of
the February 20, 2007 deadline.
Invenergy seeks fast track processing for
this complaint.
Invenergy certified that it served a
copy of the complaint on the contacts
for the ISO–NE as listed on the
Commission’s list of Corporate Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 109 (Thursday, June 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31569-31571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-11010]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[OE Docket No. PP-305]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and
Conduct Scoping; Montana Alberta Tie, Ltd.
AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intention to
prepare an EIS and to conduct scoping on the proposed Federal action of
granting a Presidential permit to construct a new electric transmission
line across the U.S.-Canada border in northwestern Montana. DOE has
determined that issuance of a Presidential permit for the proposed
project would constitute a major Federal action that may have a
significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). For this reason, DOE
intends to prepare an EIS entitled ``The Montana Alberta Tie, Ltd.
(MATL) 230-kV Transmission Line
[[Page 31570]]
Environmental Impact Statement'' (DOE/EIS-0399) to address potential
environmental impacts from the proposed action and the range of
reasonable alternatives. The EIS will be prepared in compliance with
NEPA and applicable regulations, including DOE NEPA implementing
regulations at 10 CFR part 1021. Because of the previous public
participation activities, DOE does not plan to conduct additional
scoping meetings for this EIS. Written comments on the scope of the EIS
are invited.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the proposed
project or to receive a copy of the Draft EIS when it is issued,
contact Mrs. Ellen Russell, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability (OE-20), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0350; phone 202-586-9624, facsimile
202-586-8008, or by electronic mail at Ellen.Russell@hq.doe.gov. The
MATL Presidential permit application, including associated maps and
drawings, can be downloaded in its entirety from the DOE program Web
site at https://www.oe.energy.gov/permitting/electricity_imports_
exports.htm.
DATES: DOE invites interested agencies, organizations, and members of
the public to submit comments or suggestions to assist in identifying
significant environmental issues and in determining the appropriate
scope of the EIS. The public scoping period starts with the publication
of this Notice in the Federal Register and will continue until July 9,
2007. DOE will consider all comments received or postmarked by July 9,
2007 in defining the scope of this EIS.
ADDRESSES: Comments and suggestions on the scope of the EIS should be
addressed to: Mrs. Ellen Russell, Office of Electricity Delivery and
Energy Reliability (OE-20), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0350; or by electronic
mail at Ellen.Russell@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order (E.O.) 10485, as amended by
E.O. 12038, requires that a Presidential permit be issued by DOE before
electric transmission facilities may be constructed, operated,
maintained, or connected at the U.S. international border. The E.O.
provides that a Presidential permit may be issued after a finding that
the proposed project is consistent with the public interest and after
favorable recommendations from the U.S. Departments of State and
Defense. In determining whether issuance of a Presidential permit is in
the public interest, DOE considers the environmental impacts of the
proposed project under NEPA, determines the project's impact on
electric reliability (including whether the proposed project would
adversely affect the operation of the U.S. electric power supply system
under normal and contingency conditions), and any other factors that
DOE may also consider relevant to the public interest. The regulations
implementing the E.O. have been codified at 10 CFR 205.320-205.329.
Issuance of a Presidential permit indicates that there is no Federal
objection to the project, but does not mandate that the project be
completed.
MATL has applied to DOE's Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability (OE) for a Presidential permit to construct a 230,000-volt
electric transmission line across the U.S. border with Canada, and to
the State of Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) for a
Linear Facilities construction permit. The proposed transmission line
would originate at a new substation to be constructed northeast of
Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, cross the U.S.-Canada border, and
terminate north of Great Falls, Montana, at an existing substation
owned by NorthWestern Energy. The total length of the proposed
transmission line would be 203 miles, with approximately 126 miles
constructed inside the United States.
DOE originally considered an environmental assessment (EA) to be
the appropriate level of review under NEPA and has been cooperating
with the MDEQ in the preparation of a single environmental document
that would serve as both a Montana State EIS under the Montana
Environmental Policy Act and a DOE EA under NEPA.
Identification of Environmental Issues
On November 18, 2005, DOE published a ``Notice of Intent to Prepare
an Environmental Assessment and to Conduct Public Scoping Meetings and
Notice of Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement; Montana Alberta Tie,
Ltd.'' (70 FR 69962). That notice opened a 45-day scoping period during
which the public was invited to participate in the identification of
potential environmental impacts that may result from construction of
the MATL transmission line project and reasonable alternatives. DOE and
MDEQ conducted 6 scoping meetings in the vicinity of the proposed
project. Ten issues and concerns were identified as a result of the
initial scoping opportunity. These issues and concerns are (1) impacts
on farming, ranching and other land uses, (2) impacts on protected,
threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of animals or plants, or
their critical habitats, (3) impacts on floodplains and wetlands, (4)
avian mortality, (5) impacts on cultural or historic resources, (6)
impacts on human health and safety, (7) impacts on air, soil, and
water, (8) visual impacts, (9) socioeconomic impacts, and (10) impacts
from development of wind generation. An additional alternative also was
developed by the agencies to address concerns raised by the public and
interested agencies during the scoping period.
In March 2007, the MDEQ and DOE published a draft document that was
the MDEQ Draft EIS and the DOE EA (March 2007 EA). The document was
distributed for public comment and three public hearings were conducted
to receive comments on the document during a 55-day public comment
period. Based on comments received on the March 2007 EA relating to
land use and potential effects on farming, DOE has determined an EIS to
be the proper NEPA compliance document.
EIS Preparation and Schedule
In preparing the Draft EIS, DOE will consider comments that DOE and
the State received at the 2005 scoping meetings as well as the comments
received on the March 2007 EA. DOE is working with the MDEQ to address
the comments received on the March 2007 EA and prepare responses to
comments which will be set forth in the Draft EIS. Comments submitted
on the March 2007 EA need not be resubmitted.
If the March 2007 EA does not require significant modifications to
address the comments, DOE will issue, as the DOE Draft EIS, a copy of
the March 2007 EA together with any corrections and updated information
as errata, and with responses to comments. If extensive modifications
are required to adequately address comments, DOE will issue as the DOE
Draft EIS a new document that includes the responses to comments. After
DOE issues the Draft EIS, DOE will then hold a public hearing and
accept public comment on the Draft EIS. DOE will include all comments
received on the Draft EIS, and responses to those comments, in the
Final EIS.
DOE will provide a public comment period of at least 45 days from
the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Notice of Availability
(NOA) of the Draft EIS and will hold at least one public hearing during
the public comment period. DOE may not issue a record of decision
sooner than 90 days from EPA's NOA of the Draft EIS and no sooner than
30 days from EPA's NOA of the Final EIS.
[[Page 31571]]
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2007.
Kevin M. Kolevar,
Director, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. E7-11010 Filed 6-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P