Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Movement of Barges through the Beaufort Sea between West Dock and Cape Simpson or Point Lonely, Alaska, 31550-31553 [E7-10921]
Download as PDF
31550
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
requirement for electric program
distribution, generation, and
transmission borrowers to develop an
ERP or expand an existing ERP and to
provide RUS with a written certification
that they have an ERP based upon a
VRA.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 30 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Not for profit.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
676.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 338 hours.
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Joyce McNeil,
Program Development and Regulatory
Analysis at (202) 720–0812. FAX: (202)
720–8435.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Dated: May 31, 2007.
James M. Andrew,
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. E7–10943 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 050307A]
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Movement of Barges through the
Beaufort Sea between West Dock and
Cape Simpson or Point Lonely, Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of application
and proposed incidental harassment
authorization; request for comments.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request
to authorize FEX L.P. (FEX) to take
small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment incidental to conducting a
barging operation within the U.S.
Beaufort Sea. Under the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS
is requesting comments on its proposal
to authorize FEX to incidentally take, by
harassment, small numbers of bowhead
whales, gray whales, beluga whales,
ringed seals, bearded seals, and spotted
seals in the above mentioned area
between approximately July 1 and
November 30, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Comments and information must
be received no later than July 9, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
application should be addressed to P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225, or by telephoning the
contact listed here. The mailbox address
for providing email comments is
PR1.050307A@noaa.gov. Comments
sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10–
megabyte file size. A copy of the
application containing a list of the
references used in this document may
be obtained by writing to this address or
by telephoning the contact listed here
and is also available at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm. Documents cited in this
notice may be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at this
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext
137, or Brad Smith, Alaska Region,
NMFS, (907) 271–3023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
An authorization shall be granted if
NMFS finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of the
species or stock(s) for subsistence uses,
and that the permissible methods of
taking and requirements pertaining to
the mitigation, monitoring and reporting
of such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close
of the comment period, NMFS must
either issue or deny the authorization.
Summary of Request
On April 26, 2007, NMFS received an
application from FEX to take several
species of marine mammals incidental
to the movement of two tugs towing
barges in the U.S. Beaufort Sea. Marine
barges would be used to either resupply
or demobilize from their ongoing
drilling activities on the Northwest
National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska Oil
and Gas Leases. For a resupply
operation, consumables, fuel, and
essential pad construction equipment
would be marine lifted from West Dock
(Prudhoe Bay) to the Cape Simpson
operational staging area, where it would
be stored in preparation of the 2007 2008 winter exploration season. Barges
proposed for the marine lift from the
West Dock Causeway include but are
not limited to: Crowley Marine Kavik
River and the Sag River (1,100
horsepower each) tugs, and Bowhead
Stryker or Garrett (two engines x 220
horsepower each) barges or comparable
class vessels. Additional barges and
support vessels may be utilized as
available and needed. Barges would be
moving at a speed at about 5 knots.
Barge traffic between West Dock and
Cape Simpson or Pt. Lonely is
scheduled to occur during the 2007
open-water season. The distance
between West Dock and Cape Simpson
is approximately 240 km (149 mi). From
West Dock Causeway, it would take
approximately 17.5 hours one way for a
barge to reach Point Lonely and 22
hours to Cape Simpson. Typically the
open-water season begins mid- to late
July. Every effort will be made to
complete the barging activities prior to
August 15, but no later than September
1, 2007. A late season barge effort after
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
Description of Marine Mammals
Affected by the Activity
The Beaufort Sea supports many
marine mammals under NMFS
jurisdiction, including Western Arctic
bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus),
Eastern North Pacific gray whale
(Eschrichius robustus), Beaufort Sea and
Eastern Chuchi Sea stocks of beluga
whales (Delphinapterus leucas), ringed
seals (Phoca hispida), bearded seals
(Erignathus barbatus) and spotted seals
(Phoca largha). Only the bowhead
whale is listed as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) and
designated as ‘‘depleted’’ under the
MMPA. The Western Arctic stock of
bowhead whales has the largest
population size among all 5 stocks of
this species (Angliss and Outlaw, 2007).
A brief description of the distribution,
movement patterns, and current status
of these species can be found in the FEX
application. More detailed descriptions
can be found in NMFS Stock
Assessment Reports (SARs). Please refer
to those documents for more
information on these species. The SARs
can be downloaded electronically from:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/
ak2006.pdf. The FEX application is also
available on-line (see ADDRESSES).
time for the tug/barge movement
because the most of them will be on
their summer feeding grounds in the
eastern Beaufort Sea and Amundsen
Gulf of the Canadian waters (Fraker and
Bockstoce, 1980; Shelden and Rugh,
1995).
A few transitory whales may be
encountered during the transits. Most
summering gray whales congregate in
the northern Bering Sea, particularly off
St. Lawrence Island and in the Chirikov
Basin (Moore et al., 2000), and in the
southern Chukchi Sea. In August 2001,
Williams and Coltrane (2002) reported a
single sighting of a gray whale near the
Northstar production facility, indicating
that small numbers do travel through
the waters offshore from the Prudhoe
Bay region during some summers,
however, given their rare occurrence in
the eastern portion of the Beaufort Sea
in summer, no more than a few are
expected during the summer and early
fall.
Beluga whales occur in the Beaufort
Sea during the summer, but are
expected to be found near the pack ice
edge north of the proposed movement
route. Depending on seasonal ice
conditions, it is possible that belugas
may be encountered during the transits.
Based on past surveys, ringed seals
should represent the vast majority of
marine mammals encountered during
the transits. Ringed seals are expected to
be present all along the tug/barge transit
routes. There is the possibility that
bearded and spotted seals would also be
taken by Level B harassment during
transit. Spotted seals may be present in
the West Dock/Prudhoe Bay area, but it
is likely that they may be closer to
shore.
Potential Effects of Tug/Barge
Operations and Associated Activities
on Marine Mammals
Level B harassment of marine
mammals may result from the noise
generated by the operation of towing
vessels during barge movement. The
physical presence of the tugs and barges
could also lead to disturbance of marine
mammals by visual or other cues. The
potential for collisions between vessels
and whales will be essentially zero due
to the slow tow speed (approximately 5
knots) and visual monitoring by onboard marine mammal observers
(MMOs).
Marine mammal species with the
highest likelihood of being harassed
during the tug and barge movements
are: beluga whales, ringed seals, spotted
seals, and bearded seals.
Bowhead whales are not expected to
be encountered in more than very small
numbers during the planned period of
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected
to Be Taken
The number of marine mammals that
may be taken as a result of the tug/
barging operation is unpredictable since
there is a lack of abundance estimate
data for these species within the transit
route. However, based on prior barging
activities in 2005 and 2006, it is
expected that a small number of marine
mammals could be exposed to barging
noise levels at 120 dB re 1 microPa and
above.
Harassment of cetaceans is possible
by the 2007 planned barging operations
based on the fact that bowhead whales,
gray whales, and beluga whales were all
observed during the 2005 operations
(although no cetaceans were observed
during 2006). Gray whales in 2005 were
observed near Pt. Barrow, outside the
West Dock/Cape Simpson operating
lane, during periods the vessels traveled
to Elson Lagoon to avoid foul weather.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
the annual bowhead whale hunt (late
September/early October) and before
freeze-up (late October/early November)
may occur if necessary and would be
addressed in the Conflict Avoidance
Agreement (CAA). The 2007 open-water
marine component will be complete
after the supplies are stored at Cape
Simpson in the case of a resupply, or
moved back to West Dock or Pt. Lonely
in the case of demobilization.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31551
No gray whales have been observed
between West Dock and Cape Simpson,
and are not expected to be encountered
unless weather conditions once again
dictate the safety need of the vessels
anchoring at Elson Lagoon.
Beluga distribution is difficult to
predict. Sightings are always possible,
especially if the pack ice is nearby.
The barging travel route between West
Dock and Cape Simpson approximately
follows the 7.5 m (25–ft) isobath. This
nearshore depth zone represents the
southern edge of the bowhead fall
migration route. Aerial surveys
conducted by Treacy (2002) between
1982 and 2001 found bowheads
migrating in water this shallow in only
5 (25 percent) of the 20 years of survey.
Thus, given the shallow water barging
travel route, and the inter-annual
differences in whale use of these waters,
the number of whale sightings expected
to be encountered might vary from 0 (as
in 2006) to 9 (in 2005).
Some of the whales observed in 2005
may have briefly occurred in the 120–
dB sonification zone (l km or 0.62 mi
radius), therefore, Level B harassment of
bowhead whales is possible. However,
given the shallow water travel route, the
low whale use of this shallow water
area, the presence of marine mammal
observers onboard the barges to detect
whales early and help direct the barge
away from the whales, the relatively
short distances to the 120–dB isopleths,
especially for the half the time the
vessel are traveling unloaded, and based
on cetacean encountering rates during
the 2005 barding activity, NMFS expects
that at maximum 9 bowhead whales, 8
beluga whales, and 4 gray whales could
be exposed to sound levels greater than
120 dB during the 2007 barging season.
These take numbers would represent
approximately 0.09 percent of the
Western Arctic bowhead whales
(population estimated at 10,545), 0.02
percent of the Beaufort Sea beluga
whales (population estimated at 39,258)
or 0.21 percent of the Eastern Chukchi
Sea beluga (population estimated at
3,710), and 0.02 percent of the Eastern
North Pacific gray whales (population
estimated at 18,178).
During the 2005 and 2006 barging
season, 2,419 seals representing three
species (ringed, spotted, and bearded
seals) were recorded. Approximately 90
percent of these animals were ringed
seals.
In 2006, reactions were recorded for
1,020 of the ringed seal sightings. Of
these, 48 percent (490) had no reaction,
37 percent (381) reacted mildly, and 15
percent (148) more strongly and showed
startling behavior. The percentage of
ringed seals that reacted strongly is very
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
31552
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
similar to the 17 percent recorded in
2005.
Of the 23 spotted seal sighting for
which reactions were recorded in the
2006 barging season, 30 percent (9)
showed behavioral changes.
Eighteen (24 percent) of the 75
unidentified phocids and 2 (7 percent)
of 28 bearded seals sighted showed
behavioral reactions as a result of the
2006 barging activity.
Based on the 2005 and 2006 barging
activities, NMFS estimates that
approximately 530 ringed seals, 10
spotted seals, 2 bearded seals, and 9
unidentified phocids could be taken by
Level B harassment as a result of the
proposed 2007 barging activity. These
numbers represent less than 0.02, 0.02,
and 0.0008 percent of ringed, spotted,
and bearded seals in the proposed
barging route, respectively. The
population estimates for these animals
are approximately 249,000, 59,214, and
250,000 - 300,000 for ringed, spotted,
and bearded seals, respectively.
Effects on Subsistence Needs
Barrow residents are the primary
subsistence users in the activity area.
The subsistence harvest during winter
and spring is primarily ringed seals, but
during the open-water period both
ringed and bearded seals are taken.
Barrow hunters may hunt year round;
however, in more recent years most of
the harvest has been in the summer
during open water instead of the more
difficult hunting of seals at holes and
lairs (Mclaren, 1958; Nelson, 1969). The
Barrow fall bowhead whaling grounds,
in some years, takes in the Cape
Simpson and Point Lonely areas.
The most important area for Nuiqsut
hunters is off the Colville River Delta in
Harrison Bay, between Fish Creek and
Pingok Island. Seal hunting occurs in
this area by snow machine before spring
break-up and by boat during summer.
Subsistence patterns are reflected in
harvest data collected in 1992 where
Nuiqsut hunters harvested 22 of 24
ringed seals and all 16 bearded seals
during the open water season from July
to October (Fuller and George, 1997).
Harvest data for 1994 and 1995 show 17
of 23 ringed seals were taken from June
to August, while there was no record of
bearded seals being harvested during
these years (Brower and Opie, 1997).
Due to the transient and temporary
nature of the barge operation, impacts
upon these seals are not expected to
have an unmitigable adverse impact on
subsistence uses of ringed and bearded
seals because: (1) transient operations
would temporarily displace relatively
few seals; (2) displaced seals would
likely move only a short distance and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
remain in the area for potential harvest
by native hunters; (3) studies at the
Northstar development found no
evidence of the development activities
affecting the availability of seals for
subsistence hunters; however, the
Northstar vicinity is outside the areas
used by subsistence hunters (Williams
and Moulton, 2001); and (4) the area
where barge operations would be
conducted is small compared to the
large Beaufort Sea subsistence hunting
area associated with the extremely wide
distribution of ringed seals.
In order to further minimize any effect
of barge operations on the availability of
seals for subsistence, the tug boat
owners/operators will follow U.S. Coast
Guard rules and regulations near coastal
water, therefore avoiding hunters and
the locations of any seals being hunted
in the activity area, whenever possible.
The barging, as scheduled, would be
completed before the westward
migration of bowhead whales in the fall
and the associated subsistence activities
by the local whalers. Finally,
the travel route occurs west of Cross
Island (Nuiqsut fall bowhead camp) and
east of Barrow, therefore it does not pass
by any of the whaling base camps.
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting
As in 2005 and 2006, FEX propose to
conduct a marine mammal monitoring
program as part of the 2007 program.
This program would involve the
placement of an MMO onboard each
vessel to conduct continuous
monitoring for marine mammals. The
MMOs will be trained by a qualified
marine mammal biologist and be
approved by NMFS.
The observers will scan the area
around tug/barge with 7 x 50 reticule
binoculars during the daylight hours,
and document the presence,
distribution, behavior, and reaction of
marine mammals sighted from projectassociated vessels. The primary purpose
of the marine mammal monitoring
program is to monitor the reaction of
marine mammals to the presence of the
vessels, and to detect early any whales
occurring in the barge path thereby
allowing the vessel captain time to
avoid a close approach to the animals.
FEX is also working with the Alaska
Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC)
to develop a CAA. FEX met with the
AEWC on May 24 and agreed upon the
contents of the CAA. The CAA is
expected to be signed in early June. FEX
will continue to maintain interactive
dialogue to resolve conflicts and to
notify communities of any changes in
the operations.
Reports for each roundtrip will be
prepared and provided to NMFS and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AEWC at the end of each trip. If a
coordination center is opened by other
North Slope operators and operated
during FEX’s monitoring operations,
marine mammals trip sighting reports
will be provided to that location.
A report documenting and analyzing
any harassment or other ‘‘takes’’ of
marine mammals that occur as part of
this monitoring program will be
provided to NMFS within 90 days of
completion of the monitoring activities.
Copies will be provided to other
qualified interested parties. This report
will provide dates and locations of all
barge movements and other operational
activities, weather conditions, dates and
locations of any activities related to
monitoring the effects on marine
mammals, and the methods, results, and
interpretation of all monitoring
activities, including numbers of each
species observed, location (distance) of
animals relative to the barges, direction
of movement of all individuals, and
description of any observed changes or
modifications in behavior.
ESA Consultation
The effects of oil and gas exploration
activities in the U.S. Beaufort Sea on
listed species, which includes barging
transportation activity, were analyzed as
part of a consultation on oil and gas
leasing and exploration activities in the
Beaufort Sea, Alaska, and authorization
of incidental takes under the MMPA. A
biological opinion on these activities
was issued on May 25, 2001. The only
species listed under the ESA that might
be affected during these activities are
bowhead whales. The effects of this
proposed IHA on bowhead whales will
be compared with the analysis
contained in the 2001 biological
opinion. NMFS will determine whether
the effects of the proposed activity are
consistent with the findings of that
biological opinion, and, accordingly,
NMFS will decide whether an
Incidental Take Statement under section
7 of the ESA will be issued prior to
making a final determination of issuing
the IHA.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
On February 5, 1999 (64 FR 5789), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
noted the availability of a Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers under NEPA on Beaufort Sea
oil and gas development at Northstar.
NMFS was a cooperating agency on the
preparation of the Draft and FEISs, and
subsequently, on May 18, 2000, adopted
the Corps’ FEIS as its own document.
The FEIS described impacts to marine
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 109 / Thursday, June 7, 2007 / Notices
mammals from Northstar construction
activities, which included vessel traffic
similar to the currently proposed action
by FEX. NMFS is currently evaluating
the FEIS to determine whether the
proposed activity and its likely effects
have been analyzed in the FEIS adopted
in 2000. NMFS will make a
determination as to the need for
additional NEPA analysis prior to
issuing the IHA.
Preliminary Conclusions
NMFS has determined preliminarily
that the short-term impact of conducting
a barging operation between West Dock
and either Cape Simpson or Point
Lonely, in the U.S. Beaufort and
associated activities will result, at worst,
in a Level B harassment of temporary
modification in behavior by a small
number of certain species of whales and
pinnipeds.
In addition, no take by injury and/or
death is anticipated or authorized, and
there is no potential for temporary or
permanent hearing impairment as a
result of the activities. No rookeries,
mating grounds, areas of concentrated
feeding, or other areas of special
significance for marine mammals occur
within or near the barge transit route.
The principal measures undertaken to
ensure that the barging operation will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on subsistence activities are a CAA
between FEX, the AEWC and the
Whaling Captains Association; a Plan of
Cooperation; and an operation schedule
that avoids barging operations during
the traditional bowhead whaling season
as much as possible.
Proposed Authorization
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA for
the harassment of marine mammals
incidental to FEX conducting a barging
operation from West Dock through the
U.S. Beaufort Sea to either Cape
Simpson or Point Lonely. This proposed
IHA is contingent upon incorporation of
the previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Dated: June 1, 2007.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–10921 Filed 6–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:59 Jun 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 010207A]
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Seismic Surveys in the Beaufort and
Chukchi Seas off Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of application
and proposed incidental take
authorization; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has received an
application from Shell Offshore, Inc.
(SOI) and WesternGeco for an Incidental
Harassment Authorization (IHA) to take
small numbers of marine mammals, by
harassment, incidental to conducting
marine geophysical programs, including
deep seismic surveys, on oil and gas
lease blocks located on Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) waters in the
mid and eastern Beaufort and on prelease areas in the Northern Chukchi Sea.
Under the Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting
comments on its proposal to issue an
IHA to SOI and WesternGeco to
incidentally take, by harassment, small
numbers of several species of marine
mammals between mid-July and
November, 2007 incidental to
conducting seismic surveys.
DATES: Written comments and
information must be received no later
than July 9, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
application should be addressed to P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225. The mailbox address for
providing e-mail comments is
PR1.010207A @noaa.gov. Comments
sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10–
megabyte file size. A copy of the
application (containing a list of the
references used in this document) may
be obtained by writing to this address or
by telephoning the contact listed here
and are also available at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#iha. Documents cited in
this document, that are not available
through standard public library access
methods, may be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business
hours at the address provided here.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31553
A copy of the NMFS/Minerals
Management Service’s (MMS) Draft
Programmatic Environmental
ImpactStatement (Draft PDEIS) is
available on CD from the person listed
below (see ADDRESSES) and at: https://
www.mms.gov/alaska/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Hollingshead, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 713–
2289 or Brad Smith, NMFS Anchorage
(907)271–3023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of marine mammals
by U.S. citizens who engage in a
specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
An authorization shall be granted if
NMFS finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s) and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses and the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ’’...an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as: any act of pursuit,
torment, or annoyance which
(i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of a
complete application followed by a 30–
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 109 (Thursday, June 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31550-31553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10921]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 050307A]
Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Movement of Barges through the Beaufort Sea between West Dock and Cape
Simpson or Point Lonely, Alaska
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of application and proposed incidental
harassment authorization; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request to authorize FEX L.P. (FEX) to
take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment incidental to
conducting a barging operation within the U.S. Beaufort Sea. Under the
Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on its
proposal to authorize FEX to incidentally take, by harassment, small
numbers of bowhead whales, gray whales, beluga whales, ringed seals,
bearded seals, and spotted seals in the above mentioned area between
approximately July 1 and November 30, 2007.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than July 9,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225, or by telephoning the
contact listed here. The mailbox address for providing email comments
is PR1.050307A@noaa.gov. Comments sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10-megabyte file size. A copy of the
application containing a list of the references used in this document
may be obtained by writing to this address or by telephoning the
contact listed here and is also available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/permits/incidental.htm. Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular business hours, at this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, ext 137, or Brad Smith, Alaska Region,
NMFS, (907) 271-3023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
An authorization shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking
will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s), will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses, and that the permissible methods of
taking and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and
reporting of such takings are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible
impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ''...an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of
marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny the authorization.
Summary of Request
On April 26, 2007, NMFS received an application from FEX to take
several species of marine mammals incidental to the movement of two
tugs towing barges in the U.S. Beaufort Sea. Marine barges would be
used to either resupply or demobilize from their ongoing drilling
activities on the Northwest National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska Oil and
Gas Leases. For a resupply operation, consumables, fuel, and essential
pad construction equipment would be marine lifted from West Dock
(Prudhoe Bay) to the Cape Simpson operational staging area, where it
would be stored in preparation of the 2007 - 2008 winter exploration
season. Barges proposed for the marine lift from the West Dock Causeway
include but are not limited to: Crowley Marine Kavik River and the Sag
River (1,100 horsepower each) tugs, and Bowhead Stryker or Garrett (two
engines x 220 horsepower each) barges or comparable class vessels.
Additional barges and support vessels may be utilized as available and
needed. Barges would be moving at a speed at about 5 knots.
Barge traffic between West Dock and Cape Simpson or Pt. Lonely is
scheduled to occur during the 2007 open-water season. The distance
between West Dock and Cape Simpson is approximately 240 km (149 mi).
From West Dock Causeway, it would take approximately 17.5 hours one way
for a barge to reach Point Lonely and 22 hours to Cape Simpson.
Typically the open-water season begins mid- to late July. Every effort
will be made to complete the barging activities prior to August 15, but
no later than September 1, 2007. A late season barge effort after
[[Page 31551]]
the annual bowhead whale hunt (late September/early October) and before
freeze-up (late October/early November) may occur if necessary and
would be addressed in the Conflict Avoidance Agreement (CAA). The 2007
open-water marine component will be complete after the supplies are
stored at Cape Simpson in the case of a resupply, or moved back to West
Dock or Pt. Lonely in the case of demobilization.
Description of Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
The Beaufort Sea supports many marine mammals under NMFS
jurisdiction, including Western Arctic bowhead whales (Balaena
mysticetus), Eastern North Pacific gray whale (Eschrichius robustus),
Beaufort Sea and Eastern Chuchi Sea stocks of beluga whales
(Delphinapterus leucas), ringed seals (Phoca hispida), bearded seals
(Erignathus barbatus) and spotted seals (Phoca largha). Only the
bowhead whale is listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) and designated as ``depleted'' under the MMPA. The Western Arctic
stock of bowhead whales has the largest population size among all 5
stocks of this species (Angliss and Outlaw, 2007). A brief description
of the distribution, movement patterns, and current status of these
species can be found in the FEX application. More detailed descriptions
can be found in NMFS Stock Assessment Reports (SARs). Please refer to
those documents for more information on these species. The SARs can be
downloaded electronically from: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/
ak2006.pdf. The FEX application is also available on-line (see
ADDRESSES).
Potential Effects of Tug/Barge Operations and Associated Activities on
Marine Mammals
Level B harassment of marine mammals may result from the noise
generated by the operation of towing vessels during barge movement. The
physical presence of the tugs and barges could also lead to disturbance
of marine mammals by visual or other cues. The potential for collisions
between vessels and whales will be essentially zero due to the slow tow
speed (approximately 5 knots) and visual monitoring by on-board marine
mammal observers (MMOs).
Marine mammal species with the highest likelihood of being harassed
during the tug and barge movements are: beluga whales, ringed seals,
spotted seals, and bearded seals.
Bowhead whales are not expected to be encountered in more than very
small numbers during the planned period of time for the tug/barge
movement because the most of them will be on their summer feeding
grounds in the eastern Beaufort Sea and Amundsen Gulf of the Canadian
waters (Fraker and Bockstoce, 1980; Shelden and Rugh, 1995).
A few transitory whales may be encountered during the transits.
Most summering gray whales congregate in the northern Bering Sea,
particularly off St. Lawrence Island and in the Chirikov Basin (Moore
et al., 2000), and in the southern Chukchi Sea. In August 2001,
Williams and Coltrane (2002) reported a single sighting of a gray whale
near the Northstar production facility, indicating that small numbers
do travel through the waters offshore from the Prudhoe Bay region
during some summers, however, given their rare occurrence in the
eastern portion of the Beaufort Sea in summer, no more than a few are
expected during the summer and early fall.
Beluga whales occur in the Beaufort Sea during the summer, but are
expected to be found near the pack ice edge north of the proposed
movement route. Depending on seasonal ice conditions, it is possible
that belugas may be encountered during the transits.
Based on past surveys, ringed seals should represent the vast
majority of marine mammals encountered during the transits. Ringed
seals are expected to be present all along the tug/barge transit
routes. There is the possibility that bearded and spotted seals would
also be taken by Level B harassment during transit. Spotted seals may
be present in the West Dock/Prudhoe Bay area, but it is likely that
they may be closer to shore.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected to Be Taken
The number of marine mammals that may be taken as a result of the
tug/barging operation is unpredictable since there is a lack of
abundance estimate data for these species within the transit route.
However, based on prior barging activities in 2005 and 2006, it is
expected that a small number of marine mammals could be exposed to
barging noise levels at 120 dB re 1 microPa and above.
Harassment of cetaceans is possible by the 2007 planned barging
operations based on the fact that bowhead whales, gray whales, and
beluga whales were all observed during the 2005 operations (although no
cetaceans were observed during 2006). Gray whales in 2005 were observed
near Pt. Barrow, outside the West Dock/Cape Simpson operating lane,
during periods the vessels traveled to Elson Lagoon to avoid foul
weather. No gray whales have been observed between West Dock and Cape
Simpson, and are not expected to be encountered unless weather
conditions once again dictate the safety need of the vessels anchoring
at Elson Lagoon.
Beluga distribution is difficult to predict. Sightings are always
possible, especially if the pack ice is nearby.
The barging travel route between West Dock and Cape Simpson
approximately follows the 7.5 m (25-ft) isobath. This nearshore depth
zone represents the southern edge of the bowhead fall migration route.
Aerial surveys conducted by Treacy (2002) between 1982 and 2001 found
bowheads migrating in water this shallow in only 5 (25 percent) of the
20 years of survey. Thus, given the shallow water barging travel route,
and the inter-annual differences in whale use of these waters, the
number of whale sightings expected to be encountered might vary from 0
(as in 2006) to 9 (in 2005).
Some of the whales observed in 2005 may have briefly occurred in
the 120-dB sonification zone (l km or 0.62 mi radius), therefore, Level
B harassment of bowhead whales is possible. However, given the shallow
water travel route, the low whale use of this shallow water area, the
presence of marine mammal observers onboard the barges to detect whales
early and help direct the barge away from the whales, the relatively
short distances to the 120-dB isopleths, especially for the half the
time the vessel are traveling unloaded, and based on cetacean
encountering rates during the 2005 barding activity, NMFS expects that
at maximum 9 bowhead whales, 8 beluga whales, and 4 gray whales could
be exposed to sound levels greater than 120 dB during the 2007 barging
season. These take numbers would represent approximately 0.09 percent
of the Western Arctic bowhead whales (population estimated at 10,545),
0.02 percent of the Beaufort Sea beluga whales (population estimated at
39,258) or 0.21 percent of the Eastern Chukchi Sea beluga (population
estimated at 3,710), and 0.02 percent of the Eastern North Pacific gray
whales (population estimated at 18,178).
During the 2005 and 2006 barging season, 2,419 seals representing
three species (ringed, spotted, and bearded seals) were recorded.
Approximately 90 percent of these animals were ringed seals.
In 2006, reactions were recorded for 1,020 of the ringed seal
sightings. Of these, 48 percent (490) had no reaction, 37 percent (381)
reacted mildly, and 15 percent (148) more strongly and showed startling
behavior. The percentage of ringed seals that reacted strongly is very
[[Page 31552]]
similar to the 17 percent recorded in 2005.
Of the 23 spotted seal sighting for which reactions were recorded
in the 2006 barging season, 30 percent (9) showed behavioral changes.
Eighteen (24 percent) of the 75 unidentified phocids and 2 (7
percent) of 28 bearded seals sighted showed behavioral reactions as a
result of the 2006 barging activity.
Based on the 2005 and 2006 barging activities, NMFS estimates that
approximately 530 ringed seals, 10 spotted seals, 2 bearded seals, and
9 unidentified phocids could be taken by Level B harassment as a result
of the proposed 2007 barging activity. These numbers represent less
than 0.02, 0.02, and 0.0008 percent of ringed, spotted, and bearded
seals in the proposed barging route, respectively. The population
estimates for these animals are approximately 249,000, 59,214, and
250,000 - 300,000 for ringed, spotted, and bearded seals, respectively.
Effects on Subsistence Needs
Barrow residents are the primary subsistence users in the activity
area. The subsistence harvest during winter and spring is primarily
ringed seals, but during the open-water period both ringed and bearded
seals are taken. Barrow hunters may hunt year round; however, in more
recent years most of the harvest has been in the summer during open
water instead of the more difficult hunting of seals at holes and lairs
(Mclaren, 1958; Nelson, 1969). The Barrow fall bowhead whaling grounds,
in some years, takes in the Cape Simpson and Point Lonely areas.
The most important area for Nuiqsut hunters is off the Colville
River Delta in Harrison Bay, between Fish Creek and Pingok Island. Seal
hunting occurs in this area by snow machine before spring break-up and
by boat during summer. Subsistence patterns are reflected in harvest
data collected in 1992 where Nuiqsut hunters harvested 22 of 24 ringed
seals and all 16 bearded seals during the open water season from July
to October (Fuller and George, 1997). Harvest data for 1994 and 1995
show 17 of 23 ringed seals were taken from June to August, while there
was no record of bearded seals being harvested during these years
(Brower and Opie, 1997).
Due to the transient and temporary nature of the barge operation,
impacts upon these seals are not expected to have an unmitigable
adverse impact on subsistence uses of ringed and bearded seals because:
(1) transient operations would temporarily displace relatively few
seals; (2) displaced seals would likely move only a short distance and
remain in the area for potential harvest by native hunters; (3) studies
at the Northstar development found no evidence of the development
activities affecting the availability of seals for subsistence hunters;
however, the Northstar vicinity is outside the areas used by
subsistence hunters (Williams and Moulton, 2001); and (4) the area
where barge operations would be conducted is small compared to the
large Beaufort Sea subsistence hunting area associated with the
extremely wide distribution of ringed seals.
In order to further minimize any effect of barge operations on the
availability of seals for subsistence, the tug boat owners/operators
will follow U.S. Coast Guard rules and regulations near coastal water,
therefore avoiding hunters and the locations of any seals being hunted
in the activity area, whenever possible.
The barging, as scheduled, would be completed before the westward
migration of bowhead whales in the fall and the associated subsistence
activities by the local whalers. Finally,
the travel route occurs west of Cross Island (Nuiqsut fall bowhead
camp) and east of Barrow, therefore it does not pass by any of the
whaling base camps.
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting
As in 2005 and 2006, FEX propose to conduct a marine mammal
monitoring program as part of the 2007 program. This program would
involve the placement of an MMO onboard each vessel to conduct
continuous monitoring for marine mammals. The MMOs will be trained by a
qualified marine mammal biologist and be approved by NMFS.
The observers will scan the area around tug/barge with 7 x 50
reticule binoculars during the daylight hours, and document the
presence, distribution, behavior, and reaction of marine mammals
sighted from project-associated vessels. The primary purpose of the
marine mammal monitoring program is to monitor the reaction of marine
mammals to the presence of the vessels, and to detect early any whales
occurring in the barge path thereby allowing the vessel captain time to
avoid a close approach to the animals.
FEX is also working with the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission
(AEWC) to develop a CAA. FEX met with the AEWC on May 24 and agreed
upon the contents of the CAA. The CAA is expected to be signed in early
June. FEX will continue to maintain interactive dialogue to resolve
conflicts and to notify communities of any changes in the operations.
Reports for each roundtrip will be prepared and provided to NMFS
and AEWC at the end of each trip. If a coordination center is opened by
other North Slope operators and operated during FEX's monitoring
operations, marine mammals trip sighting reports will be provided to
that location.
A report documenting and analyzing any harassment or other
``takes'' of marine mammals that occur as part of this monitoring
program will be provided to NMFS within 90 days of completion of the
monitoring activities. Copies will be provided to other qualified
interested parties. This report will provide dates and locations of all
barge movements and other operational activities, weather conditions,
dates and locations of any activities related to monitoring the effects
on marine mammals, and the methods, results, and interpretation of all
monitoring activities, including numbers of each species observed,
location (distance) of animals relative to the barges, direction of
movement of all individuals, and description of any observed changes or
modifications in behavior.
ESA Consultation
The effects of oil and gas exploration activities in the U.S.
Beaufort Sea on listed species, which includes barging transportation
activity, were analyzed as part of a consultation on oil and gas
leasing and exploration activities in the Beaufort Sea, Alaska, and
authorization of incidental takes under the MMPA. A biological opinion
on these activities was issued on May 25, 2001. The only species listed
under the ESA that might be affected during these activities are
bowhead whales. The effects of this proposed IHA on bowhead whales will
be compared with the analysis contained in the 2001 biological opinion.
NMFS will determine whether the effects of the proposed activity are
consistent with the findings of that biological opinion, and,
accordingly, NMFS will decide whether an Incidental Take Statement
under section 7 of the ESA will be issued prior to making a final
determination of issuing the IHA.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
On February 5, 1999 (64 FR 5789), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) noted the availability of a Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under
NEPA on Beaufort Sea oil and gas development at Northstar. NMFS was a
cooperating agency on the preparation of the Draft and FEISs, and
subsequently, on May 18, 2000, adopted the Corps' FEIS as its own
document. The FEIS described impacts to marine
[[Page 31553]]
mammals from Northstar construction activities, which included vessel
traffic similar to the currently proposed action by FEX. NMFS is
currently evaluating the FEIS to determine whether the proposed
activity and its likely effects have been analyzed in the FEIS adopted
in 2000. NMFS will make a determination as to the need for additional
NEPA analysis prior to issuing the IHA.
Preliminary Conclusions
NMFS has determined preliminarily that the short-term impact of
conducting a barging operation between West Dock and either Cape
Simpson or Point Lonely, in the U.S. Beaufort and associated activities
will result, at worst, in a Level B harassment of temporary
modification in behavior by a small number of certain species of whales
and pinnipeds.
In addition, no take by injury and/or death is anticipated or
authorized, and there is no potential for temporary or permanent
hearing impairment as a result of the activities. No rookeries, mating
grounds, areas of concentrated feeding, or other areas of special
significance for marine mammals occur within or near the barge transit
route.
The principal measures undertaken to ensure that the barging
operation will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on subsistence
activities are a CAA between FEX, the AEWC and the Whaling Captains
Association; a Plan of Cooperation; and an operation schedule that
avoids barging operations during the traditional bowhead whaling season
as much as possible.
Proposed Authorization
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA for the harassment of marine mammals
incidental to FEX conducting a barging operation from West Dock through
the U.S. Beaufort Sea to either Cape Simpson or Point Lonely. This
proposed IHA is contingent upon incorporation of the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-10921 Filed 6-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S