Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Reverse Mergers and Shareholder Approval for Change of Control Situations, 31355-31357 [E7-10871]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 6, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
update their policies and procedures
under the rule each year. We estimate
that 815 of these institutions are smaller
entities that spend an average of 6 hours
reviewing and updating their policies
and procedures once per year, or 4,890
hours annually. We estimate that an
additional 1,265 larger institutions
spend an average of 30 hours to review
and update their safeguard policies and
procedures, or 37,950 hours each year.
Accordingly, we estimate that the
annual burden for covered institutions
that review and update their safeguard
policies and procedures is 42,840 hours.
We therefore estimate a total of 2,529
respondents and an annual burden of
91,575 hours associated with the rule’s
collection of information requirement.
These estimates of average burden
hours are made solely for the purposes
of the Paperwork Reduction Act. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. The safeguard rule does not
require the reporting of any information
or the filing of any documents with the
Commission. The collection of
information required by the safeguard
rule is mandatory.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or send an
e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: May 30, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–10847 Filed 6–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Jun 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request; Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension: Form F–6; OMB Control No.
3235–0292; SEC File No. 270–270.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget this
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
The Commission exercised its
authority under Section 19 of the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et
seq.) to establish Form F–6 for
registration of American Depositary
Receipts (ADRs) of foreign companies.
Form F–6 requires disclosure of
information regarding the terms of the
depository bank, fees charged, and a
description of the ADRs. No special
information regarding the foreign
company is required to be prepared or
disclosed, although the foreign company
must be one which periodically
furnishes information to the
Commission. The information is needed
to ensure that investors in ADRs have
full disclosure of information
concerning the deposit agreement and
the foreign company. Form F–6 takes
approximately 1 hour per response to
prepare and is filed by 150 respondents
annually. We estimate that 25% of the
1 hour per response (.25 hours) is
prepared by the filer for a total annual
reporting burden of 37.5 hours (.25
hours per response × 150 responses).
The information provided on Form F–
6 is mandatory to best ensure full
disclosure of ADRs being issued in the
U.S. All information provided to the
Commission is available for public
review upon request.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Written comments regarding the
above information should be directed to
the following persons: (i) Desk Officer
for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102,
New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31355
mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov;
and
(ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Comments must be submitted to OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
Dated: May 30, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–10848 Filed 6–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–55837; File No. SR–Amex–
2006–99]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Approval to Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto
Relating to Reverse Mergers and
Shareholder Approval for Change of
Control Situations
May 31, 2007.
I. Introduction
On October 5, 2006, the American
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act
(‘‘Act’’), and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change relating to reverse
mergers. On February 14, 2007, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.3 The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on March 22,
2007.4 The Commission received no
comments on the proposed rule change.
This order approves the proposed rule
change, as amended.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 makes revisions to the
proposed rule text, including revisions conforming
the proposed rule text to a filing submitted by The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’) and
approved by the Commission in the period
following submission of the original filing
(Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55052
(January 5, 2007), 72 FR 1569 (January 12, 2007)
(SR–NASDAQ–2006–047)) and revisions
incorporating an immediately effective filing
submitted by Amex in the same period (Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 55096 (January 12, 2007),
72 FR 2563 (January 19, 2007) (SR–Amex–2007–
03)). Amendment No. 1 replaces and supersedes the
original filing in its entirety.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55477
(Mar. 15, 2007), 72 FR 13542.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
31356
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 6, 2007 / Notices
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend (i)
Section 341 of the Amex Company
Guide (‘‘Guide’’) to clarify the
circumstances under which a listed
issuer will be deemed to have engaged
in a reverse merger thereby requiring the
post-transaction entity to satisfy the
initial listing standards and the process
a listed issuer must follow when
applying for initial listing in connection
with a reverse merger and (ii) Section
713 of the Guide to require shareholder
approval in connection with the
issuance or potential issuance of
additional listed securities that will
result in a change of control of a listed
issuer.
Section 341 of the Guide currently
provides that if an issuer listed on the
Amex engages in any plan of
acquisition, merger or consolidation, the
net effect of which is that the listed
issuer is acquired by an unlisted entity,
even if the listed issuer is the nominal
survivor, the post-transaction entity is
required to satisfy the initial listing
standards. Such transactions are
typically referred to as ‘‘Reverse
Mergers.’’ Because the issuer resulting
from a Reverse Merger is essentially a
different entity from the listed issuer,
Section 341 does not permit the posttransaction entity to remain listed on
the Amex unless it qualifies as a new
listing. The Exchange stated that this
prohibition is intended to prevent ‘‘back
door listings’’ whereby an unqualified
entity attempts to obtain an Amex
listing. Both the New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) 5 and Nasdaq 6
have comparable provisions.
The Exchange stated that many
Reverse Mergers are entered into for
bona fide business reasons; however, in
some cases listed issuers that are not in
compliance with the continued listing
standards, and face potential delisting,
attempt to enter into Reverse Mergers
with private entities in order to retain
their Amex listing. In other situations,
the Exchange explained that a listed
issuer may be in compliance with the
continued listing standards but the posttransaction entity would not satisfy the
initial listing standards. In both of these
cases, a change of control occurs but the
listed issuer attempts to structure the
transaction so that it will not be deemed
a Reverse Merger under the current rule.
The Exchange proposes amending
Section 341 to provide greater clarity
and transparency as to (i) What
constitutes a Reverse Merger, (ii) the
factors the Exchange will consider in
5 Section 703.08(E) of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual.
6 Nasdaq Rule 4340(a).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Jun 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
determining whether a transaction or
series of transactions constitute(s) a
Reverse Merger, (iii) the consequences
of entering into a Reverse Merger and
(iv) the process a listed issuer must
follow in connection with a Reverse
Merger. The proposed rule change will
provide that, in addition to meeting the
initial listing standards, a listed
company entering into a Reverse Merger
will need to obtain shareholder
approval in accordance with Section
713 in order to issue additional listed
securities in connection with such
Reverse Merger. In addition, while the
determination of whether a Reverse
Merger has occurred or will occur is to
some degree subjective, the Exchange
proposes to amend Section 341 to more
clearly delineate the factors that will be
considered by the Exchange in its
analysis of a transaction.7
Section 341 currently recommends
that listed issuers submit any proposed
plan which could constitute a Reverse
Merger to the Exchange for an informal
opinion prior to the plan’s
promulgation. The Exchange stated that
the intent of such provision is to permit
Exchange staff to review the proposed
transaction in order to determine if it
constitutes a Reverse Merger and, in the
case of a Reverse Merger, to review the
post-transaction entity in order to
confirm that it will meet initial listing
standards. The Exchange proposes to
make such process more transparent by
requiring a listed issuer to submit an
initial listing application with sufficient
time to permit the Exchange to complete
its review of the post-transaction entity
and providing that delisting proceedings
will be commenced if such initial listing
application has not been approved prior
to consummation of the Reverse Merger.
The Commission approved a similar
rule change filed by Nasdaq.8
In association with the proposed
changes to Section 341, the Exchange
also proposes to amend Section 713.
Section 713 currently requires
shareholder approval as a prerequisite
to Exchange approval of applications to
7 The Exchange’s proposed Section 341 states that
a ‘‘Reverse Merger’’ is: ‘‘any plan of acquisition,
merger or consolidation whereby a listed company
combines with, or into, a company not listed on the
Exchange, resulting in a change of control of the
listed company and potentially allowing such
unlisted company to obtain an Exchange listing. In
determining whether a change of control constitutes
a Reverse Merger, the Exchange will consider all
relevant factors, including, but not limited to,
changes in the management, board of directors,
voting power, ownership, and financial structure of
the listed company. The Exchange will also
consider the nature of the businesses and the
relative size of both the listed and the unlisted
companies.’’ See proposed Section 341 of the
Guide.
8 See supra note 3.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
list additional shares issued in
connection with a transaction (other
than a public offering) which would
involve the application of the initial
listing standards in evaluating an
acquisition of a listed company by an
unlisted company under Section 341 of
the Guide. The Exchange proposes
revising Section 713 to require
shareholder approval as a prerequisite
to Exchange approval of additional
listing applications when the issuance
or potential issuance of additional
securities will result in a change of
control of a listed issuer, regardless of
whether such change of control also
constitutes a Reverse Merger.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes
changes to Sections 341 and 713 to
clarify the relationship between their
respective requirements. Both NYSE 9
and Nasdaq 10 require shareholder
approval for change of control
transactions and the Exchange believes
it is necessary and appropriate to
require listed issuers to obtain
shareholder approval of any issuance or
potential issuance of additional listed
securities that will result in a change of
control.
III. Discussion
After careful review of the proposal,
the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.11 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,12 which requires, among other
things, that the rules of an exchange be
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and the national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Commission believes that the
proposal will help listed companies by
providing greater clarity as to the
process a listed company must follow in
connection with a reverse merger. More
specifically, the Commission notes that
the proposed rule change provides
guidance to issuers on what constitutes
a Reverser Merger under the Exchange’s
rules, as well as the consequences of
such a transaction, including potential
9 Section 312.03(d) of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual.
10 Nasdaq Rule 4350(i)(1)(B).
11 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 6, 2007 / Notices
delisting. This additional guidance may
be helpful to investors as well.
Finally, the Commission notes that
the Exchange is clarifying and
broadening its shareholder approval
rules by requiring shareholder approval
in all change of control situations, not
just Reverse Mergers, which will protect
investors and the public interest. This
should allow investors of listed issuers
to participate in important corporate
decisions involving a change of control.
While certain change of control
situations would require shareholder
approval under other provisions of the
Guide, this proposal ensures that all
change of control situations must be
approved by shareholders, thereby
strengthening the Exchange’s
shareholder approval requirements, and
is consistent with comparable rules of
the New York Stock Exchange and
Nasdaq.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the
proposed rule change (SR–Amex–2006–
99) be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–10871 Filed 6–5–07; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Permanent Approval of the Preferred
Market Maker Program
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
May 29, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 15,
2007, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Jun 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
The Exchange proposes to make the
Preferred Market Maker Program
permanent. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on CBOE’s Web
site at https://www.cboe.org/legal, at the
Exchange’s principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item III below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–55826; File No. SR–CBOE–
2007–47]
14 17
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
13 15
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons and is
approving the proposal on an
accelerated basis.
In June, 2005, CBOE obtained
approval of a filing adopting a Preferred
DPM Program.3 This allowed order
providers to send orders to the
Exchange designating a Preferred DPM
from among the DPM complex. If the
Preferred DPM was quoting at the NBBO
at the time the order was received by
CBOE, the Preferred DPM was entitled
to the entire DPM participation
entitlement. The Exchange subsequently
modified the applicable participation
entitlement percentages under the
program 4 and, then expanded the scope
of the program to apply to qualifying
Market Makers (as opposed to just
DPMs).5 At that time the program was
31357
renamed the Preferred Market Maker
Program.
The Preferred Market Maker Program
has been operating on a pilot basis. The
pilot is due to expire on June 2, 2007.
Since the Pilot was put into operation
it has been positively received by the
options trading community. There has
not been any adverse or unanticipated
negative impact on the market by the
presence of the Preferred Market Maker
Program. Further, CBOE believes that
the pilot program helps generate greater
order flow for the Exchange which in
turn adds depth and liquidity to CBOE’s
markets.
2. Statutory Basis
CBOE believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act 6 and
the rules and regulations under the Act
applicable to a national securities
exchange and, in particular, the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.7
Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 8 requirements that
an exchange have rules that are
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and to
protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposal.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
3 See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51779
(June 2, 2005), 70 FR 33564 (June 8, 2005)
(approving SR–CBOE–2004–71).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 51824
(June 10, 2005), 70 FR 35476 (June 20, 2005)
(approving SR–CBOE–2005–45); and 52021 (July
13, 2005), 70 FR 41462 (July 19, 2005) (approving
SR–CBOE–2005–50).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52506
(September 23, 2005), 70 FR 57340 (September 30,
2005) (approving SR–CBOE–2005–58).
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
6 15
U.S.C. 78a et seq.
U.S.C. 78(f)(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
7 15
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31355-31357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10871]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-55837; File No. SR-Amex-2006-99]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto
Relating to Reverse Mergers and Shareholder Approval for Change of
Control Situations
May 31, 2007.
I. Introduction
On October 5, 2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities
Exchange Act (``Act''), and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule
change relating to reverse mergers. On February 14, 2007, the Exchange
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 22,
2007.\4\ The Commission received no comments on the proposed rule
change. This order approves the proposed rule change, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 makes revisions to the proposed rule text,
including revisions conforming the proposed rule text to a filing
submitted by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') and approved
by the Commission in the period following submission of the original
filing (Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55052 (January 5, 2007),
72 FR 1569 (January 12, 2007) (SR-NASDAQ-2006-047)) and revisions
incorporating an immediately effective filing submitted by Amex in
the same period (Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55096 (January
12, 2007), 72 FR 2563 (January 19, 2007) (SR-Amex-2007-03)).
Amendment No. 1 replaces and supersedes the original filing in its
entirety.
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55477 (Mar. 15,
2007), 72 FR 13542.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 31356]]
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend (i) Section 341 of the Amex Company
Guide (``Guide'') to clarify the circumstances under which a listed
issuer will be deemed to have engaged in a reverse merger thereby
requiring the post-transaction entity to satisfy the initial listing
standards and the process a listed issuer must follow when applying for
initial listing in connection with a reverse merger and (ii) Section
713 of the Guide to require shareholder approval in connection with the
issuance or potential issuance of additional listed securities that
will result in a change of control of a listed issuer.
Section 341 of the Guide currently provides that if an issuer
listed on the Amex engages in any plan of acquisition, merger or
consolidation, the net effect of which is that the listed issuer is
acquired by an unlisted entity, even if the listed issuer is the
nominal survivor, the post-transaction entity is required to satisfy
the initial listing standards. Such transactions are typically referred
to as ``Reverse Mergers.'' Because the issuer resulting from a Reverse
Merger is essentially a different entity from the listed issuer,
Section 341 does not permit the post-transaction entity to remain
listed on the Amex unless it qualifies as a new listing. The Exchange
stated that this prohibition is intended to prevent ``back door
listings'' whereby an unqualified entity attempts to obtain an Amex
listing. Both the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') \5\ and Nasdaq
\6\ have comparable provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Section 703.08(E) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
\6\ Nasdaq Rule 4340(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange stated that many Reverse Mergers are entered into for
bona fide business reasons; however, in some cases listed issuers that
are not in compliance with the continued listing standards, and face
potential delisting, attempt to enter into Reverse Mergers with private
entities in order to retain their Amex listing. In other situations,
the Exchange explained that a listed issuer may be in compliance with
the continued listing standards but the post-transaction entity would
not satisfy the initial listing standards. In both of these cases, a
change of control occurs but the listed issuer attempts to structure
the transaction so that it will not be deemed a Reverse Merger under
the current rule.
The Exchange proposes amending Section 341 to provide greater
clarity and transparency as to (i) What constitutes a Reverse Merger,
(ii) the factors the Exchange will consider in determining whether a
transaction or series of transactions constitute(s) a Reverse Merger,
(iii) the consequences of entering into a Reverse Merger and (iv) the
process a listed issuer must follow in connection with a Reverse
Merger. The proposed rule change will provide that, in addition to
meeting the initial listing standards, a listed company entering into a
Reverse Merger will need to obtain shareholder approval in accordance
with Section 713 in order to issue additional listed securities in
connection with such Reverse Merger. In addition, while the
determination of whether a Reverse Merger has occurred or will occur is
to some degree subjective, the Exchange proposes to amend Section 341
to more clearly delineate the factors that will be considered by the
Exchange in its analysis of a transaction.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange's proposed Section 341 states that a ``Reverse
Merger'' is: ``any plan of acquisition, merger or consolidation
whereby a listed company combines with, or into, a company not
listed on the Exchange, resulting in a change of control of the
listed company and potentially allowing such unlisted company to
obtain an Exchange listing. In determining whether a change of
control constitutes a Reverse Merger, the Exchange will consider all
relevant factors, including, but not limited to, changes in the
management, board of directors, voting power, ownership, and
financial structure of the listed company. The Exchange will also
consider the nature of the businesses and the relative size of both
the listed and the unlisted companies.'' See proposed Section 341 of
the Guide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 341 currently recommends that listed issuers submit any
proposed plan which could constitute a Reverse Merger to the Exchange
for an informal opinion prior to the plan's promulgation. The Exchange
stated that the intent of such provision is to permit Exchange staff to
review the proposed transaction in order to determine if it constitutes
a Reverse Merger and, in the case of a Reverse Merger, to review the
post-transaction entity in order to confirm that it will meet initial
listing standards. The Exchange proposes to make such process more
transparent by requiring a listed issuer to submit an initial listing
application with sufficient time to permit the Exchange to complete its
review of the post-transaction entity and providing that delisting
proceedings will be commenced if such initial listing application has
not been approved prior to consummation of the Reverse Merger. The
Commission approved a similar rule change filed by Nasdaq.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In association with the proposed changes to Section 341, the
Exchange also proposes to amend Section 713. Section 713 currently
requires shareholder approval as a prerequisite to Exchange approval of
applications to list additional shares issued in connection with a
transaction (other than a public offering) which would involve the
application of the initial listing standards in evaluating an
acquisition of a listed company by an unlisted company under Section
341 of the Guide. The Exchange proposes revising Section 713 to require
shareholder approval as a prerequisite to Exchange approval of
additional listing applications when the issuance or potential issuance
of additional securities will result in a change of control of a listed
issuer, regardless of whether such change of control also constitutes a
Reverse Merger. Additionally, the Exchange proposes changes to Sections
341 and 713 to clarify the relationship between their respective
requirements. Both NYSE \9\ and Nasdaq \10\ require shareholder
approval for change of control transactions and the Exchange believes
it is necessary and appropriate to require listed issuers to obtain
shareholder approval of any issuance or potential issuance of
additional listed securities that will result in a change of control.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Section 312.03(d) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
\10\ Nasdaq Rule 4350(i)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion
After careful review of the proposal, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements
of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange.\11\ In particular, the Commission finds
that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\
which requires, among other things, that the rules of an exchange be
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
the national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the proposal will help listed
companies by providing greater clarity as to the process a listed
company must follow in connection with a reverse merger. More
specifically, the Commission notes that the proposed rule change
provides guidance to issuers on what constitutes a Reverser Merger
under the Exchange's rules, as well as the consequences of such a
transaction, including potential
[[Page 31357]]
delisting. This additional guidance may be helpful to investors as
well.
Finally, the Commission notes that the Exchange is clarifying and
broadening its shareholder approval rules by requiring shareholder
approval in all change of control situations, not just Reverse Mergers,
which will protect investors and the public interest. This should allow
investors of listed issuers to participate in important corporate
decisions involving a change of control. While certain change of
control situations would require shareholder approval under other
provisions of the Guide, this proposal ensures that all change of
control situations must be approved by shareholders, thereby
strengthening the Exchange's shareholder approval requirements, and is
consistent with comparable rules of the New York Stock Exchange and
Nasdaq.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\13\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Amex-2006-99) be, and hereby
is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-10871 Filed 6-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P