Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings, 31293-31296 [E7-10830]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 6, 2007 / Notices
www.climate.noaa.gov/index.jsp?pg=./
ccsp/33.jsp). Please note that meeting
location, times, and agenda topics
described below are subject to change.
Status: The meeting will be open to
public participation and will include a
30-minute public comment period on
June 25 from 4 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. (check
Web site to confirm this time and the
room in which the meeting will be
held). The CPDC–S&A 3.3 expects that
public statements presented at its
meetings will not be repetitive of
previously submitted verbal or written
statements. In general, each individual
or group making a verbal presentation
will be limited to a total time of five (5)
minutes. Written comments (at least 35
copies) should be received by the
CPDC–S&A 3.3 Designated Federal
Official (DFO) by June 18, 2007 to
provide sufficient time for review.
Written comments received after June
18 will be distributed to the CPDC–S&A
3.3, but may not be reviewed prior to
the meeting date. Seats will be available
to the public on a first-come, first-served
basis.
Matters to be Considered: The
meeting will (1) formulate responses to
the published NRC review report on the
First Draft of Synthesis and Assessment
Product 3.3 and revise the First Draft
accordingly; (2) finalize plans for
completion and submission of the
Second Draft of Synthesis and
Assessment Product 3.3 to the Climate
Change Science Program Office for the
public comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Christopher D. Miller, CPDC–S&A 3.3
DFO and the Program Manager, NOAA/
OAR/Climate Program Office, Climate
Change Data and Detection Program
Element, 1315 East-West Highway,
Room 12239, Silver Spring, Maryland
20910; telephone 301–734–1241, e-mail:
Christopher.D.Miller@noaa.gov.
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meetings and
hearings.
SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) will
hold its 138th meeting to consider and
take actions on fishery management
issues in the Western Pacific Region.
DATES: The 138th Council meeting and
public hearings will be held on June 19
- 22, 2007. For specific times and the
agenda, see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
The 138th Council meeting
and public hearings will be held at the
Ala Moana Hotel, 410 Atkinson Drive,
Honolulu, HI 96814–4722; telephone:
(808) 955–4811.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director;
telephone: (808) 522–8220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
addition to the agenda items listed here,
the Council will hear recommendations
from other Council advisory groups.
Public comment periods will be
provided throughout the agenda. The
order in which agenda items are
addressed may change. The Council will
meet as late as necessary to complete
scheduled business.
ADDRESSES:
Schedule and Agenda for Council
Standing Committee Meetings
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Standing Committee
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
1. 9 a.m. - 11 a.m. - Marianas
Archipelago Ecosystem Standing
Committee
2. 9 a.m. - 11 a.m. - Hawaii
Archipelago Ecosystem Standing
Committee
3. 11 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. - American
Samoa Archipelago Ecosystem Standing
Committee
4. 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. - Pelagics and
International Ecosystem Standing
Committee
5. 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m. - Program
Planning/Research Standing Committee
6. 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m. - Executive/
Budget Standing Committee
The agenda during the full Council
meeting will include the items listed
here.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Schedule and Agenda for Council
Meeting
[XRIN: 0648–XA66]
Wednesday, June 20, 2007, 9 a.m. - 9
p.m.
Dated: May 31, 2007.
Terry Bevels,
Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Office of
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 07–2801 Filed 6–1–07; 10:21 am]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–KB–P
Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council; Public Meetings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Jun 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
1. Introductions
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of 137th Meeting Minutes
4. Agency Reports
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31293
A. NMFS
1. Pacific Islands Regional Office
(PIRO)
2. Pacific Islands Fisheries Science
Center (PIFSC)
B. NOAA General Counsel
C. United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS)
5. Mariana Archipelago
A. Island Area Reports
1. Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands (CNMI)
2. Guam
B. Enforcement Reports
1. CNMI Enforcement Agency Report
2. Guam Enforcement Agency Report
3. United States Coast Guard (USCG)
Enforcement Report
4. NMFS Office for Law Enforcement
(OLE) Report
5. Status of Violations
C. CNMI Marine Conservation Plan
(MCP)
D. Mariana Community Initiatives and
New Issues
E. Education and Outreach Initiatives
F. Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) Recommendations
G. Standing Committee
Recommendations
H. Public Comment
I. Council Discussion and Action
6. American Samoa Archipelago
A. Island Area Reports
B. Enforcement Reports
1. Agency Enforcement Report
2. U.S.C.G. Enforcement Report
3. NMFS OLE Report
4. Status of Violations
C. Report on American Samoa
Longline Workshop
D. Education and Outreach Initiatives
E. Advisory Panel (AP)
Recommendations
F. Regional Ecosystem Advisory
Committee (REAC) Report
G. SSC Recommendations
H. Standing Committee
Recommendations
I. Public Comment
J. Council Discussion and Action
7. Hawaii Archipelago and Pacific
Remote Island Areas (PRIA)
A. Main Hawaiian Islands (MHI)
Bottomfish (ACTION ITEM)
1. Report on MHI Bottomfish Working
Groups and Meetings
a. Public Meetings
b. Agency Workshop, Working Groups
and Outreach
c. Enforcement Training and
Compliance Workshop
2. Seasonal Closure, Total Allowable
Catch (TAC), Permits and Reporting
3. Permits and Reporting Details
4. Federal Recreational Bag Limits
5. Inclusion of State of Hawaii
Bottomfish Restricted Fishing Areas
(BRFA) in Federal Waters
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
31294
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 6, 2007 / Notices
5. Secretariat for the Pacific
Community (SPC)/Papua New Guinea
Tuna Tagging
F. Pelagic Plan Team
Recommendations
G. AP Recommendations
H. SSC Recommendations
I. Standing Committee
Recommendations
J. Public Hearing
K. Council Discussion and Action
Thursday, June 21, 2007, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
B. Risk Analysis of Potential TAC
C. Updated Analysis of State of
Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources
(HDAR) Survey of Bottomfish Registered
Vessel Owners
D. AP Recommendations
E. SSC Recommendations
F. Standing Committee
Recommendations
G. Public Hearing
H. Council Discussion
Friday, June 22, 2007, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
7. Hawaii Archipelago and PRIA
(Continued)
I. Island Area Reports
J. Enforcement Reports1. Agency
Enforcement Report
2. U.S.C.G. Enforcement Report
3. NMFS OLE Report
4. Status of Violations
K. Precious Corals
1. Potential for Auau Limited Entry
(ACTION ITEM)
2. Precious Corals Plan Team Report
L. Hawaii Community Initiatives
1. Hoohanohano I Na Kupuna Puwalu
IV Report
2. Report on Development of Hawaii
Community Development Program
3. Legislative Actions
M. Education and Outreach Initiatives
N. AP Recommendations
O. REAC Report
P. SSC Recommendations
Q. Standing Committee
Recommendations
R. Public Hearing
S. Council Discussion and Action
8. Pelagic and International Fisheries
A. Longline Management
1. Longline Tuna TAC Framework
(ACTION ITEM)
2. Guam Longline Area Closure
(ACTION ITEM)
3. Status of Hawaii Longline
Association Swordfish Proposal
B. Non-longline fisheries
1. Recreational Fisheries
a. Recreational fishery registration
b. Ad-hoc Recreational Fisheries Data
Task Force Meeting
2. Hawaii-based Pelagic Vessels NonLongline, Non-Purse-Seine Limited
Entry (ACTION ITEM)
C. Status of Amendment 14 to the
Pelagics Fishery Management Plan
D. American Samoa and Hawaii
Longline Quarterly Reports
E. International Fisheries
1. ISC Bycatch Working Group
2. Inter-American Tropical Tuna
Commission (IATTC) Stock Assessment
Working Group
3. Western and Central Pacific
Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), Third
Science Committee Meeting Agenda and
Risk Assessment Workshop Report
4. WCPFC Implementing Actions
9. Program Planning
A. Update on Use of State of Hawaii
Disaster Relief Funds
B. Fishery and Seafood Marketing
Development
C. Using Local Names for non-Local
Fish
D. Status of Fishery Management
Actions
E. Social Science Research Committee
Report
F. Report on Magnuson-Stevens
Reauthorization Act (MSRA)
1. Annual Catch Limit Guidance
2. Marine Training and Education
Program
G. Report on Regulatory Streamlining
Workshop
H. New Program Initiatives from AP
and REAC
I. SSC Recommendations
J. Standing Committee
Recommendations
K. Public Comment
L. Council Discussion and Action
10. Administrative Matters & Budget
A. Financial Reports
B. Administrative Reports
C. Meetings and Workshops
D. Council Family Changes
1. Advisory Group Changes
2. REAC Membership
E. Council Committee Assignments
F. Standing Committee
Recommendations
G. Public Comment
H. Council Discussion and Action
11. Other Business
A. Next Meeting
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Jun 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. MHI bottomfish (ACTION ITEM)
NMFS determined that overfishing of
the bottomfish species complex was
occurring within the Hawaiian
Archipelago with the primary problem
being excess fishing mortality in the
main Hawaiian Islands. The NMFS
Regional Administrator for the Pacific
Islands Regional Office notified the
Western Pacific Regional Fishery
Management Council of this overfishing
determination on May 27, 2005.
In response, the Council prepared and
transmitted to NMFS in May 2006, an
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
amendment to the Bottomfish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), which
recommended closure of federal waters
around Penguin and Middle Banks to
bottomfish fishing to end the
overfishing Before that recommendation
was processed by NMFS, however, an
updated stock assessment was
completed by NMFS’ Pacific Islands
Fisheries Science Center in 2006 which
concluded the required reduction in
fishing mortality based on 2004 data
would be 24 percent. This new
information indicated a need for the
Council to re-examine this action which
was done.
Therefore, to end bottomfish
overfishing based on the most recent
data, the Council is recommending
amending the Bottomfish FMP using a
phased approach. The 24 percent
reduction would be achieved in 2007
and 2008 through the use of seasonal
closures in conjunction with limits on
total allowable catches (TACs). As
fishery monitoring improves,
overfishing would be prevented in 2009
and beyond through implementation of
TACs based on, and applied to, the
commercial and the recreational sectors.
Tracking of commercial landings
towards the TAC would begin when the
fishery reopens on October 1, 2007.
During the open period, recreational
catches would continue to be managed
by bag limits, however they would be
changed from the current five onaga
and/or ehu combined per person per
trip, to five of any Deep 7 species
combined per person per trip and they
would be extended into Federal waters
to ease enforcement. Once commercial
Deep 7 landings reached the TAC, both
the commercial and recreational sectors
would be closed. Phase 2 includes a
Federal permit requirement for
recreational fishermen who catch Deep
7 in the MHI.
The Council will also consider
implementing Federal reporting
requirements for recreational fishermen
who target or catch bottomfish
management unit species (BMUS) in the
MHI. This would provide fishery
scientists with the data needed to
calculate and track a recreational
portion of the overall TAC.
In 2008, the second seasonal closure
to MHI Deep 7 fishing will be from May
August 2008, followed by
implementation of a combined
commercial and recreational Deep 7
TAC beginning September 1, 2008. The
recreational bag limits would be
eliminated.
In subsequent years, 2009 and
beyond, the MHI Deep 7 fishery would
be managed via a commercial and
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 6, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
recreational TAC calculated by PIFSC to
prevent overfishing of these species.
At its 138th meeting, the Council will
take final action on these
recommendations, as well as on a series
of related implementation details.
The Council will also consider
whether inclusion of State of Hawaii’s
Bottomfish Restricted Fishing Areas in
Federal waters is consistent with the
Bottomfish FMP.
2. Potential for Auau Channel limited
entry (ACTION ITEM)
Research has revealed that the
biomass of the black coral populations
has decreased by at least 25% in the last
30 years. Stringent measures were
recommended by scientists and the
Council’s Precious Corals Plan Team to
conserve the black coral resource in the
Auau Channel. In response the Council
has recommended removing an
exemption that allowed certain
fishermen to harvest black coral at a
slightly smaller minimum size than
non-exempted fishermen. This is
expected to provide a longer period of
recruitment. The Council has also
recommended the designation of the
Auau Channel as an established bed
with an associated harvest quota that
would be applicable to both State and
Federal waters. This is intended to
ensure that harvests are limited and that
the fishery is sustainably managed.
Although the Council has recommended
several regulatory changes to address
this problem, a limited access program
may provide an additional safeguard to
ensure that harvests are limited and that
the fishery is sustainably managed.
Based on a recommendation from the
Precious Corals Plan Team, the Council
is now considering creating a limited
entry system for the black coral fishery
in Federal waters of the Auau Channel.
Limiting participation in the fishery
would allow fishery managers and
enforcement officers to more tightly
monitor harvests to ensure that the
quota is not exceeded. There are
currently less than three commercial
black coral fishing operations active
within the State and Federal waters that
encompass the Auau Channel black
coral bed. There are no known noncommercial operations.
The following alternatives are being
proposed:
Alternative 1: No Action.
Under this alternative participation in
the black coral fishery would continue
to be open to all applicants.
Alternative 2: Limit access to current
black coral fishery participants via
transferable limited access permits.
Under this alternative participation in
the portion of the Auau Channel black
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Jun 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
coral fishery located in Federal waters
would initially be limited to those
participants who are currently active in
this fishery. When these participants
were ready to leave the fishery, they
could transfer their permits by sale,
trade or gift to new participants.
However the total number of
participants would be capped at current
levels.
Alternative 3: Limit participation to a
target number of participants via
transferable limited access permits.
Under this alternative participation in
the portion of the Auau Channel black
coral fishery located in Federal waters
would be limited to a target number of
participants. The appropriate target has
not been determined but would be
calculated based on the area’s
productivity, typical fishing operating
patterns, and social and economic
considerations. The target number of
participants could be less than, equal to,
or greater than the number of currently
active participants. When these
participants were ready to leave the
fishery, they could transfer their permits
by sale, trade or gift to new participants.
Alternative 4: Limit participation to
currently active participants via nontransferable limited access permits and
close the Federal portion of the fishery
when these participants retire.
Under this alternative participation in
the portion of the Auau Channel black
coral fishery located in Federal waters
would be limited to those currently
active participants. When these
participants leave the fishery, their
permits would be retired and no new
entrants would be permitted to enter
this portion of the fishery.
At its 138th meeting in Honolulu, HI,
the Council may take action on this
issue in regards to the fisheries of the
Hawaiian archipelago and may make a
recommendation for management of the
black coral fishery of the Auau Channel,
Hawaii.
3. Longline tuna TAC framework
(ACTION ITEM)
At its 138th meeting, the Council may
take final action to adjust the framework
process within the Pelagics Fishery
Management Plan (PFMP) to allow for
the implementation of longline catch
limits stemming from the decisions of
the two Pacific tuna Regional Fishery
Management Organizations (RFMOs).
International management and
conservation of bigeye tuna in the
Pacific is the responsibility of the
Western and Central Pacific Fishery
Commission (WCPFC) and the InterAmerican Tropical Tuna Commission
(IATTC). The two Pacific tuna RFMOs
have already implemented limits on
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31295
fleet-wide catches of bigeye tuna by
longline vessels, and it is likely that
further measures may also be applied to
other tunas caught by longliners.
Currently, there is no mechanism by
U.S. catch limits established by an
RFMO can be efficiently implemented
through the Magnuson-Stevens Act
(MSA) process by the Western Pacific
Council.
An amendment to the PFMP typically
requires approximately one year for the
completion of necessary documentation,
analysis Secretarial review and
approval, and implementation. Pacific
RFMO tuna harvest limits are likely to
change annually, based on the results of
stock assessments and other changes in
the fishery. Timely domestic
implementation of catch limits
stemming from the tuna RFMOs will
require that abbreviated background
work and documentation be prepared in
advance of RFMO decisions. The
framework process is designed for this
situation. Under this process the
Council will prepare and review
analyses of anticipated impacts of a
likely range of catch limits. This
analysis will then be used by the
Council to accept or modify the RFMO
decisions under the MSA. All analyses
will be subject to public review and
comment, as will any proposed rule
resulting from this process.
At its 137th meeting, the Council
endorsed an alternative to modify the
framework process in the PFMP to give
the Council the ability to implement
catch limits for the harvesting of pelagic
fish by longline vessels. Implicit in this
recommendation was that additional
analysis of impacts would heed advice
from the Council’s SSC that observer
data between Eastern Pacific Ocean
(EPO) and Western and Central Pacific
Ocean (WCPO) be disaggregated for the
Hawaii longline fishery, and that
swordfish and tuna longline fisheries
catch rates between the EPO and WCPO
be similarly disaggregated. This was
suggested in order to more precisely
estimate the expected range of tuna
catches and their impacts on the
environment.
4. Guam longline area closure (ACTION
ITEM)
Until recently, longlining has not
been conducted by U.S. vessels based
out of ports in the Mariana Islands
(Guam and the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands). In 2006,
however, the Guam Fishermen’s
Cooperative (GFC) began operating a
longline vessel, fishing primarily within
the U.S. EEZ around Guam using a 50ft
fishing vessel converted to longlining
through assistance from the Council’s
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
31296
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 6, 2007 / Notices
Community Demonstration Project
Program (CDPP). The primary function
of the vessel is to operate in a training
capacity to train Guam fishermen to
longline fish. Most fishermen have no
experience in offshore, multi-day
fishing trips or with using longline gear.
However, the operations of the GFC
vessel are constrained within the U.S.
EEZ around Guam due to a 50 nautical
mile exclusion zone for longline and
purse seine vessels around the island of
Guam and its offshore banks,
implemented in 1992 through
Amendment 5 to the Pelagics Fishery
Management Plan (PFMP). In 1992,
there was no domestic Guam longline
fishery but troll fishermen in Guam
were concerned about unrestricted
growth of longlining by U.S. vessels
from outside the territory following the
expansion of the Hawaii longline fishery
after 1987. In response to these
concerns, the Council recommended
in1990 the implementation of the 50 nm
closures around Guam and its offshore
banks in September. The Council also
established a control date of December
6, 1990 control date for entry into
longline fishery, although this date is
now redundant.
The original concerns about
expansion of U.S. longline fishing
home-ported out of Guam through
vessels migrating from other parts of the
U.S. now appear to be unfounded. As
such, the area closures developed in the
early 1990s may now be an unnecessary
impediment to the continued growth of
’domestic’ longlining on Guam.
However, troll fishermen on Guam still
wish to see some form of protection
from gear conflict with longline fishing,
especially some form of area closure
around the offshore banks, from where
about one third of fishing trips are
conducted.
At its 137th meeting, the Council
supported continued development of
longline closed area in Guam which
would encompass the locally designated
White Tuna Banks, an area of
importance to Guam’s troll fishermen.
Subsequently, a total of seven
alternatives have been analyzed by the
Council:
1. No action
2. Community Development Progam
3. Exploratory Fishing Permit
4. Reduce the longline exclusion zone
to a uniform 25 nm around Guam
5. Modify the existing longline area
closure to exclude only vessels over a
certain size class
6. Seasonal reduction in the longline
exclusion zone around Guam
The analysis of the seven alternatives
in the draft amendment document looks
at the impacts of longline fishing,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Jun 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
primarily on the existing troll fishery on
Guam, on protected and sensitive
species and fishery participants and the
fishing community on Guam. In the
absence of longline fishery data from the
GFC vessel, a proxy model was
developed based on deep set tuna
longline fishing by domestic longliners
in the Federated States of Micronesia,
coupled with observer data from the
SPC for this type of fishery. This proxy
was then used to look at longline
catches at low and moderate levels of
fishing effort associated with training
fishermen and a high level of effort
consistent with a commercial operation.
The Council may take final action at the
138th meeting and select a preferred
alternative for modifying the current
longline closed area in the U.S. EEZ
around Guam.
5. Hawaii-based Pelagic Vessels Nonlongline, Non-purse seine limited entry
(ACTION ITEM)
At its 137th meeting, the Council
recommended that the potential for a
limited entry program be investigated
for the Hawaii charter vessel fishery.
This recommendation stemmed from
the ongoing and planned expansion of
small boat harbors in Hawaii which may
afford greater number of charter vessels
to operate from Hawaii and Oahu. Catch
and effort data from both locations
shows that over a 20 year time span
catch rates for blue marlin have
declined by about 50–60%, while effort
has increased, particularly in recent
years. As a consequence of this
recommendation, a control rule was
published for the fishery dated May 11,
2007, after which new entrants are not
guaranteed future participation.
The Council may also wish to
consider whether it wished to limit
entry for other non-longline coastal
pelagic fisheries (NLCPs). Among the
reasons for considering such action are
new language in the Magnuson-Stevens
Reauthorization Act (MSRA) requiring
Councils to set Annual Catch Limits
(ACLs) for federally managed fisheries.
ACLs were designated in the MSRA as
another measure to ensure that stocks
are not overfished. Moreover,
conservation measures for bigeye and
yellowfin tuna stemming from the
Western and Central Pacific Fishery
Commission (WCPFC) are increasingly
focusing on fisheries other than purse
seining and longline fishing, and may in
the future require data on these fisheries
and possible limits on catches.
Consequently at the 138th meeting, the
Council may consider limiting entry for
NLCPs beyond charter vessels.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
before these groups for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during these meetings. Action
will be restricted to those issues
specifically identified in this notice and
any issues arising after publication of
this notice that require emergency
action under section 305(c) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the Council’s intent to take final action
to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds,
(808) 522–8220 (voice) or (808) 522–
8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to the
meeting date.
Authority: 16 U.S. C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–10830 Filed 6–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Notification of Request for Extension
of Approval of Information Collection
Requirements—Recordkeeping
Requirements Under the Safety
Regulations for Non-Full-Size Cribs
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In the February 12, 2007
Federal Register (72 FR 6535), the
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC or Commission) published a
notice in accordance with provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) to announce the
agency’s intention to seek an extension
of approval of information collection
requirements in the safety regulations
for non-full-size cribs. 16 CFR
1500.18(a)(14) and part 1509. Joint
comments in support of the information
collection were submitted by the
Consumer Federation of America,
Consumers Union, Kids in Danger and
Keeping Babies Safe, Inc. Commentors
state that the ability of the Commission
to better communicate news of recalls to
retailers and individuals is critical to
removing potentially dangerous cribs
and the continued collection of
information may assist in that effort.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31293-31296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10830]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[XRIN: 0648-XA66]
Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meetings and hearings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will
hold its 138th meeting to consider and take actions on fishery
management issues in the Western Pacific Region.
DATES: The 138th Council meeting and public hearings will be held on
June 19 - 22, 2007. For specific times and the agenda, see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: The 138th Council meeting and public hearings will be held
at the Ala Moana Hotel, 410 Atkinson Drive, Honolulu, HI 96814-4722;
telephone: (808) 955-4811.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director;
telephone: (808) 522-8220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In addition to the agenda items listed here,
the Council will hear recommendations from other Council advisory
groups. Public comment periods will be provided throughout the agenda.
The order in which agenda items are addressed may change. The Council
will meet as late as necessary to complete scheduled business.
Schedule and Agenda for Council Standing Committee Meetings
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Standing Committee
1. 9 a.m. - 11 a.m. - Marianas Archipelago Ecosystem Standing
Committee
2. 9 a.m. - 11 a.m. - Hawaii Archipelago Ecosystem Standing
Committee
3. 11 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. - American Samoa Archipelago Ecosystem
Standing Committee
4. 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. - Pelagics and International Ecosystem
Standing Committee
5. 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m. - Program Planning/Research Standing
Committee
6. 3:30 p.m. - 5 p.m. - Executive/Budget Standing Committee
The agenda during the full Council meeting will include the items
listed here.
Schedule and Agenda for Council Meeting
Wednesday, June 20, 2007, 9 a.m. - 9 p.m.
1. Introductions
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of 137th Meeting Minutes
4. Agency Reports
A. NMFS
1. Pacific Islands Regional Office (PIRO)
2. Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC)
B. NOAA General Counsel
C. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
5. Mariana Archipelago
A. Island Area Reports
1. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI)
2. Guam
B. Enforcement Reports
1. CNMI Enforcement Agency Report
2. Guam Enforcement Agency Report
3. United States Coast Guard (USCG) Enforcement Report
4. NMFS Office for Law Enforcement (OLE) Report
5. Status of Violations
C. CNMI Marine Conservation Plan (MCP)
D. Mariana Community Initiatives and New Issues
E. Education and Outreach Initiatives
F. Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) Recommendations
G. Standing Committee Recommendations
H. Public Comment
I. Council Discussion and Action
6. American Samoa Archipelago
A. Island Area Reports
B. Enforcement Reports
1. Agency Enforcement Report
2. U.S.C.G. Enforcement Report
3. NMFS OLE Report
4. Status of Violations
C. Report on American Samoa Longline Workshop
D. Education and Outreach Initiatives
E. Advisory Panel (AP) Recommendations
F. Regional Ecosystem Advisory Committee (REAC) Report
G. SSC Recommendations
H. Standing Committee Recommendations
I. Public Comment
J. Council Discussion and Action
7. Hawaii Archipelago and Pacific Remote Island Areas (PRIA)
A. Main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) Bottomfish (ACTION ITEM)
1. Report on MHI Bottomfish Working Groups and Meetings
a. Public Meetings
b. Agency Workshop, Working Groups and Outreach
c. Enforcement Training and Compliance Workshop
2. Seasonal Closure, Total Allowable Catch (TAC), Permits and
Reporting
3. Permits and Reporting Details
4. Federal Recreational Bag Limits
5. Inclusion of State of Hawaii Bottomfish Restricted Fishing Areas
(BRFA) in Federal Waters
[[Page 31294]]
B. Risk Analysis of Potential TAC
C. Updated Analysis of State of Hawaii Division of Aquatic
Resources (HDAR) Survey of Bottomfish Registered Vessel Owners
D. AP Recommendations
E. SSC Recommendations
F. Standing Committee Recommendations
G. Public Hearing
H. Council Discussion
Thursday, June 21, 2007, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
7. Hawaii Archipelago and PRIA (Continued)
I. Island Area Reports
J. Enforcement Reports1. Agency Enforcement Report
2. U.S.C.G. Enforcement Report
3. NMFS OLE Report
4. Status of Violations
K. Precious Corals
1. Potential for Auau Limited Entry (ACTION ITEM)
2. Precious Corals Plan Team Report
L. Hawaii Community Initiatives
1. Hoohanohano I Na Kupuna Puwalu IV Report
2. Report on Development of Hawaii Community Development Program
3. Legislative Actions
M. Education and Outreach Initiatives
N. AP Recommendations
O. REAC Report
P. SSC Recommendations
Q. Standing Committee Recommendations
R. Public Hearing
S. Council Discussion and Action
8. Pelagic and International Fisheries
A. Longline Management
1. Longline Tuna TAC Framework (ACTION ITEM)
2. Guam Longline Area Closure (ACTION ITEM)
3. Status of Hawaii Longline Association Swordfish Proposal
B. Non-longline fisheries
1. Recreational Fisheries
a. Recreational fishery registration
b. Ad-hoc Recreational Fisheries Data Task Force Meeting
2. Hawaii-based Pelagic Vessels Non-Longline, Non-Purse-Seine
Limited Entry (ACTION ITEM)
C. Status of Amendment 14 to the Pelagics Fishery Management Plan
D. American Samoa and Hawaii Longline Quarterly Reports
E. International Fisheries
1. ISC Bycatch Working Group
2. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) Stock Assessment
Working Group
3. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), Third
Science Committee Meeting Agenda and Risk Assessment Workshop Report
4. WCPFC Implementing Actions
5. Secretariat for the Pacific Community (SPC)/Papua New Guinea
Tuna Tagging
F. Pelagic Plan Team Recommendations
G. AP Recommendations
H. SSC Recommendations
I. Standing Committee Recommendations
J. Public Hearing
K. Council Discussion and Action
Friday, June 22, 2007, 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
9. Program Planning
A. Update on Use of State of Hawaii Disaster Relief Funds
B. Fishery and Seafood Marketing Development
C. Using Local Names for non-Local Fish
D. Status of Fishery Management Actions
E. Social Science Research Committee Report
F. Report on Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act (MSRA)
1. Annual Catch Limit Guidance
2. Marine Training and Education Program
G. Report on Regulatory Streamlining Workshop
H. New Program Initiatives from AP and REAC
I. SSC Recommendations
J. Standing Committee Recommendations
K. Public Comment
L. Council Discussion and Action
10. Administrative Matters & Budget
A. Financial Reports
B. Administrative Reports
C. Meetings and Workshops
D. Council Family Changes
1. Advisory Group Changes
2. REAC Membership
E. Council Committee Assignments
F. Standing Committee Recommendations
G. Public Comment
H. Council Discussion and Action
11. Other Business
A. Next Meeting
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. MHI bottomfish (ACTION ITEM)
NMFS determined that overfishing of the bottomfish species complex
was occurring within the Hawaiian Archipelago with the primary problem
being excess fishing mortality in the main Hawaiian Islands. The NMFS
Regional Administrator for the Pacific Islands Regional Office notified
the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council of this
overfishing determination on May 27, 2005.
In response, the Council prepared and transmitted to NMFS in May
2006, an amendment to the Bottomfish Fishery Management Plan (FMP),
which recommended closure of federal waters around Penguin and Middle
Banks to bottomfish fishing to end the overfishing Before that
recommendation was processed by NMFS, however, an updated stock
assessment was completed by NMFS' Pacific Islands Fisheries Science
Center in 2006 which concluded the required reduction in fishing
mortality based on 2004 data would be 24 percent. This new information
indicated a need for the Council to re-examine this action which was
done.
Therefore, to end bottomfish overfishing based on the most recent
data, the Council is recommending amending the Bottomfish FMP using a
phased approach. The 24 percent reduction would be achieved in 2007 and
2008 through the use of seasonal closures in conjunction with limits on
total allowable catches (TACs). As fishery monitoring improves,
overfishing would be prevented in 2009 and beyond through
implementation of TACs based on, and applied to, the commercial and the
recreational sectors.
Tracking of commercial landings towards the TAC would begin when
the fishery reopens on October 1, 2007. During the open period,
recreational catches would continue to be managed by bag limits,
however they would be changed from the current five onaga and/or ehu
combined per person per trip, to five of any Deep 7 species combined
per person per trip and they would be extended into Federal waters to
ease enforcement. Once commercial Deep 7 landings reached the TAC, both
the commercial and recreational sectors would be closed. Phase 2
includes a Federal permit requirement for recreational fishermen who
catch Deep 7 in the MHI.
The Council will also consider implementing Federal reporting
requirements for recreational fishermen who target or catch bottomfish
management unit species (BMUS) in the MHI. This would provide fishery
scientists with the data needed to calculate and track a recreational
portion of the overall TAC.
In 2008, the second seasonal closure to MHI Deep 7 fishing will be
from May August 2008, followed by implementation of a combined
commercial and recreational Deep 7 TAC beginning September 1, 2008. The
recreational bag limits would be eliminated.
In subsequent years, 2009 and beyond, the MHI Deep 7 fishery would
be managed via a commercial and
[[Page 31295]]
recreational TAC calculated by PIFSC to prevent overfishing of these
species.
At its 138th meeting, the Council will take final action on these
recommendations, as well as on a series of related implementation
details.
The Council will also consider whether inclusion of State of
Hawaii's Bottomfish Restricted Fishing Areas in Federal waters is
consistent with the Bottomfish FMP.
2. Potential for Auau Channel limited entry (ACTION ITEM)
Research has revealed that the biomass of the black coral
populations has decreased by at least 25% in the last 30 years.
Stringent measures were recommended by scientists and the Council's
Precious Corals Plan Team to conserve the black coral resource in the
Auau Channel. In response the Council has recommended removing an
exemption that allowed certain fishermen to harvest black coral at a
slightly smaller minimum size than non-exempted fishermen. This is
expected to provide a longer period of recruitment. The Council has
also recommended the designation of the Auau Channel as an established
bed with an associated harvest quota that would be applicable to both
State and Federal waters. This is intended to ensure that harvests are
limited and that the fishery is sustainably managed. Although the
Council has recommended several regulatory changes to address this
problem, a limited access program may provide an additional safeguard
to ensure that harvests are limited and that the fishery is sustainably
managed.
Based on a recommendation from the Precious Corals Plan Team, the
Council is now considering creating a limited entry system for the
black coral fishery in Federal waters of the Auau Channel. Limiting
participation in the fishery would allow fishery managers and
enforcement officers to more tightly monitor harvests to ensure that
the quota is not exceeded. There are currently less than three
commercial black coral fishing operations active within the State and
Federal waters that encompass the Auau Channel black coral bed. There
are no known non-commercial operations.
The following alternatives are being proposed:
Alternative 1: No Action.
Under this alternative participation in the black coral fishery
would continue to be open to all applicants.
Alternative 2: Limit access to current black coral fishery
participants via transferable limited access permits.
Under this alternative participation in the portion of the Auau
Channel black coral fishery located in Federal waters would initially
be limited to those participants who are currently active in this
fishery. When these participants were ready to leave the fishery, they
could transfer their permits by sale, trade or gift to new
participants. However the total number of participants would be capped
at current levels.
Alternative 3: Limit participation to a target number of
participants via transferable limited access permits.
Under this alternative participation in the portion of the Auau
Channel black coral fishery located in Federal waters would be limited
to a target number of participants. The appropriate target has not been
determined but would be calculated based on the area's productivity,
typical fishing operating patterns, and social and economic
considerations. The target number of participants could be less than,
equal to, or greater than the number of currently active participants.
When these participants were ready to leave the fishery, they could
transfer their permits by sale, trade or gift to new participants.
Alternative 4: Limit participation to currently active participants
via non-transferable limited access permits and close the Federal
portion of the fishery when these participants retire.
Under this alternative participation in the portion of the Auau
Channel black coral fishery located in Federal waters would be limited
to those currently active participants. When these participants leave
the fishery, their permits would be retired and no new entrants would
be permitted to enter this portion of the fishery.
At its 138th meeting in Honolulu, HI, the Council may take action
on this issue in regards to the fisheries of the Hawaiian archipelago
and may make a recommendation for management of the black coral fishery
of the Auau Channel, Hawaii.
3. Longline tuna TAC framework (ACTION ITEM)
At its 138th meeting, the Council may take final action to adjust
the framework process within the Pelagics Fishery Management Plan
(PFMP) to allow for the implementation of longline catch limits
stemming from the decisions of the two Pacific tuna Regional Fishery
Management Organizations (RFMOs).
International management and conservation of bigeye tuna in the
Pacific is the responsibility of the Western and Central Pacific
Fishery Commission (WCPFC) and the Inter-American Tropical Tuna
Commission (IATTC). The two Pacific tuna RFMOs have already implemented
limits on fleet-wide catches of bigeye tuna by longline vessels, and it
is likely that further measures may also be applied to other tunas
caught by longliners. Currently, there is no mechanism by U.S. catch
limits established by an RFMO can be efficiently implemented through
the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA) process by the Western Pacific Council.
An amendment to the PFMP typically requires approximately one year
for the completion of necessary documentation, analysis Secretarial
review and approval, and implementation. Pacific RFMO tuna harvest
limits are likely to change annually, based on the results of stock
assessments and other changes in the fishery. Timely domestic
implementation of catch limits stemming from the tuna RFMOs will
require that abbreviated background work and documentation be prepared
in advance of RFMO decisions. The framework process is designed for
this situation. Under this process the Council will prepare and review
analyses of anticipated impacts of a likely range of catch limits. This
analysis will then be used by the Council to accept or modify the RFMO
decisions under the MSA. All analyses will be subject to public review
and comment, as will any proposed rule resulting from this process.
At its 137th meeting, the Council endorsed an alternative to modify
the framework process in the PFMP to give the Council the ability to
implement catch limits for the harvesting of pelagic fish by longline
vessels. Implicit in this recommendation was that additional analysis
of impacts would heed advice from the Council's SSC that observer data
between Eastern Pacific Ocean (EPO) and Western and Central Pacific
Ocean (WCPO) be disaggregated for the Hawaii longline fishery, and that
swordfish and tuna longline fisheries catch rates between the EPO and
WCPO be similarly disaggregated. This was suggested in order to more
precisely estimate the expected range of tuna catches and their impacts
on the environment.
4. Guam longline area closure (ACTION ITEM)
Until recently, longlining has not been conducted by U.S. vessels
based out of ports in the Mariana Islands (Guam and the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands). In 2006, however, the Guam Fishermen's
Cooperative (GFC) began operating a longline vessel, fishing primarily
within the U.S. EEZ around Guam using a 50ft fishing vessel converted
to longlining through assistance from the Council's
[[Page 31296]]
Community Demonstration Project Program (CDPP). The primary function of
the vessel is to operate in a training capacity to train Guam fishermen
to longline fish. Most fishermen have no experience in offshore, multi-
day fishing trips or with using longline gear.
However, the operations of the GFC vessel are constrained within
the U.S. EEZ around Guam due to a 50 nautical mile exclusion zone for
longline and purse seine vessels around the island of Guam and its
offshore banks, implemented in 1992 through Amendment 5 to the Pelagics
Fishery Management Plan (PFMP). In 1992, there was no domestic Guam
longline fishery but troll fishermen in Guam were concerned about
unrestricted growth of longlining by U.S. vessels from outside the
territory following the expansion of the Hawaii longline fishery after
1987. In response to these concerns, the Council recommended in1990 the
implementation of the 50 nm closures around Guam and its offshore banks
in September. The Council also established a control date of December
6, 1990 control date for entry into longline fishery, although this
date is now redundant.
The original concerns about expansion of U.S. longline fishing
home-ported out of Guam through vessels migrating from other parts of
the U.S. now appear to be unfounded. As such, the area closures
developed in the early 1990s may now be an unnecessary impediment to
the continued growth of 'domestic' longlining on Guam. However, troll
fishermen on Guam still wish to see some form of protection from gear
conflict with longline fishing, especially some form of area closure
around the offshore banks, from where about one third of fishing trips
are conducted.
At its 137th meeting, the Council supported continued development
of longline closed area in Guam which would encompass the locally
designated White Tuna Banks, an area of importance to Guam's troll
fishermen. Subsequently, a total of seven alternatives have been
analyzed by the Council:
1. No action
2. Community Development Progam
3. Exploratory Fishing Permit
4. Reduce the longline exclusion zone to a uniform 25 nm around
Guam
5. Modify the existing longline area closure to exclude only
vessels over a certain size class
6. Seasonal reduction in the longline exclusion zone around Guam
The analysis of the seven alternatives in the draft amendment
document looks at the impacts of longline fishing, primarily on the
existing troll fishery on Guam, on protected and sensitive species and
fishery participants and the fishing community on Guam. In the absence
of longline fishery data from the GFC vessel, a proxy model was
developed based on deep set tuna longline fishing by domestic
longliners in the Federated States of Micronesia, coupled with observer
data from the SPC for this type of fishery. This proxy was then used to
look at longline catches at low and moderate levels of fishing effort
associated with training fishermen and a high level of effort
consistent with a commercial operation. The Council may take final
action at the 138th meeting and select a preferred alternative for
modifying the current longline closed area in the U.S. EEZ around Guam.
5. Hawaii-based Pelagic Vessels Non-longline, Non-purse seine limited
entry (ACTION ITEM)
At its 137th meeting, the Council recommended that the potential
for a limited entry program be investigated for the Hawaii charter
vessel fishery. This recommendation stemmed from the ongoing and
planned expansion of small boat harbors in Hawaii which may afford
greater number of charter vessels to operate from Hawaii and Oahu.
Catch and effort data from both locations shows that over a 20 year
time span catch rates for blue marlin have declined by about 50-60%,
while effort has increased, particularly in recent years. As a
consequence of this recommendation, a control rule was published for
the fishery dated May 11, 2007, after which new entrants are not
guaranteed future participation.
The Council may also wish to consider whether it wished to limit
entry for other non-longline coastal pelagic fisheries (NLCPs). Among
the reasons for considering such action are new language in the
Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act (MSRA) requiring Councils to set
Annual Catch Limits (ACLs) for federally managed fisheries. ACLs were
designated in the MSRA as another measure to ensure that stocks are not
overfished. Moreover, conservation measures for bigeye and yellowfin
tuna stemming from the Western and Central Pacific Fishery Commission
(WCPFC) are increasingly focusing on fisheries other than purse seining
and longline fishing, and may in the future require data on these
fisheries and possible limits on catches. Consequently at the 138th
meeting, the Council may consider limiting entry for NLCPs beyond
charter vessels.
Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come
before these groups for discussion, those issues may not be the subject
of formal action during these meetings. Action will be restricted to
those issues specifically identified in this notice and any issues
arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action
under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's
intent to take final action to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically accessible to people with
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, (808) 522-8220
(voice) or (808) 522-8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to the meeting
date.
Authority: 16 U.S. C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: June 1, 2007.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-10830 Filed 6-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S