Authorization To Impose License Requirements for Exports or Reexports to Entities Acting Contrary to the National Security or Foreign Policy Interests of the United States, 31005-31008 [E7-10788]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
structure interface are not submerged in fuel,
which, in combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion
and consequent loss of the airplane.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Compliance
15 CFR Parts 744 and 772
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Measure Electrical Resistance/Corrective &
Other Specified Actions
(f) Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD: Measure the electrical
resistance of the bond between the No. 2 fuel
transfer pump adapter surface of the fuel tank
and the fuel transfer pump housing flange in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin
DC10–28–250 or MD11–28–129, both dated
July 26, 2006, as applicable.
(1) If the resistance measurement is 2.5
milliohms or less: No further action is
required by this paragraph.
(2) If the resistance measurement is more
than 2.5 milliohms: Before further flight,
electrically bond the fuel tank No. 2 fuel
transfer pump housing surfaces in
accordance with the service bulletin.
(3) Before further flight thereafter, do an
electrical resistance bonding test to verify the
electrical resistance between the fuel transfer
pump housing and the structure is 2.5
milliohms maximum. If that electrical
resistance is not achieved, rework the
electrical bond until the electrical resistance
is achieved. Do the actions in accordance
with the service bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
(g)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office (LAACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 25,
2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–10756 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 0612243150–63150–01]
RIN 0694–AD82
Authorization To Impose License
Requirements for Exports or
Reexports to Entities Acting Contrary
to the National Security or Foreign
Policy Interests of the United States
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Entity List (Supplement
No. 4 to part 744 of the Export
Administration Regulations) provides
notice to the public that certain exports
and reexports to parties identified on
the Entity List require a license from the
Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
and that availability of License
Exceptions in such transactions is
limited. This proposed rule would
expand the scope of reasons for which
BIS may add parties to the Entity List.
This proposed rule would also amend
the Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) to state explicitly that a party
listed on the Entity List has a right to
request that its listing be removed or
modified and would set procedures for
addressing such requests.
DATES: Comments concerning this rule
must be received by BIS no later than
August 6, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this rule may
be submitted to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (follow the
instructions for submitting comments)
by e-mail directly to BIS at
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov (refer to
regulatory identification number 0694–
AD82 in the subject line), by fax at (202)
482–3355, or on paper to Regulatory
Policy Division, Office of Exporter
Services, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Room H2705, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. Refer to
Regulatory Identification Number (RIN)
0694–AD82 in all comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Rithmire, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration,
Bureau of Industry and Security, e-mail
mrithmir@bis.doc.gov, tel. ( 202) 482–
6105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jun 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31005
Background
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to
part 744 of the EAR) provides notice to
the public of the identity of certain
parties whose presence as a recipient of
items subject to the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) can
impose a license requirement in an
export or reexport transaction. The
reasons for which BIS may place an
entity on the Entity List are stated in
§§ 744.2, 744.3, 744.4, 744.6, 744.10 and
744.20 of the EAR.
In addition to those reasons, this
proposed rule would create a new
§ 744.11 to authorize BIS to add to the
Entity List entities that BIS has
reasonable cause to believe, based on
specific and articulable facts, have been,
are or pose a risk of being involved in
activities that are contrary to the
national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States or those
acting on behalf of such entities. This
new section would not be used to add
to the Entity List entities that are U.S.
persons (as defined in § 772.1 of the
EAR). This new section also would not
be used to add to the Entity List entities
for which the EAR already impose a
license requirement because those
entities are already listed on the List of
Specially Designated Nationals and
Blocked Persons published by the
Treasury Department, Office of Foreign
Assets Control.
Reason for the Changes Proposed by
This Rule
BIS is proposing to take this action to
focus its export control efforts more
closely on problematic potential
recipients of items that are subject to the
EAR, but who do not meet the criteria
currently set forth in §§ 744.2, 744.3,
744.4, 744.6, 744.10 or 744.20. With this
rule, the United States government
would be able to conduct prior review
and make appropriate licensing
decisions regarding proposed exports
and reexports to such recipients to the
degree necessary to protect its interests.
BIS would be able to tailor license
requirements and availability of license
exceptions for exports and reexports to
parties who have taken, are taking, or
will take actions that are contrary to
United States national security or
foreign policy interests without
imposing additional license
requirements that apply broadly to
entire destinations or items. BIS
believes that such targeted application
of license requirements would provide
the flexibility to deter use of items that
are subject to the EAR in ways that are
inimical to the interests of the United
States with minimal costs to and
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
31006
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
disruption of legitimate trade. As export
controls continue to focus not just on
countries, but also on individual
customers or entities, BIS believes it is
important to provide more information
to the public about entities of concern.
Implementation of this rule will provide
additional information to the public to
enhance the ability to screen potential
recipients of items subject to the EAR.
In addition, this proposed rule would
simplify the EAR by reducing the need
to issue general orders to impose license
requirements on specific parties.
License requirements currently imposed
on specific entities through general
orders would, under this rule, be
imposed by adding such entities to the
Entity List. Such an action would
reduce the number of EAR provisions
that the public would have to review to
determine license requirements under
the EAR.
Summary of the Changes Proposed by
This Rule
This proposed rule would authorize
BIS to impose foreign policy export and
reexport license requirements, limit the
availability of License Exceptions, and
set license application review policy for
exports and reexports of items subject to
the EAR to entities that BIS has
reasonable cause to believe, based on
specific and articulable facts, have been,
are or pose a risk of being involved in
activities that are contrary to the
national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States or those
acting on behalf of such entities. This
proposed rule would not require that
such activities involve items or
activities that are subject to the EAR.
This proposed rule lists five types of
conduct, in addition to the grounds set
forth in §§744.2, 744.3, 744.4, 744.6 or
744.20, that BIS could determine are
contrary to U.S. national security or
foreign policy interests. They are: (i)
Supporting persons engaged in acts of
terror; (ii) Actions that could enhance
the military capability of, or the ability
to support terrorism of governments that
have been designated by the Secretary of
State as having repeatedly provided
support for acts of international
terrorism; (iii) Transferring, developing,
servicing, repairing, or producing
conventional weapons in a manner that
is contrary to United States national
security or foreign policy interests or
enabling such transfer, development,
service, repair or production by
supplying parts, components,
technology, or financing for such
activity; (iv) Deliberately failing or
refusing to comply with an end use
check conducted by or on behalf of BIS
or the Department of State, Directorate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jun 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
of Defense Trade Controls by denying
access, by refusing to provide
information about parties to a
transaction, or by providing information
about such parties that is false or that
cannot be verified or authenticated; and
(v) Engaging in conduct that poses a risk
of violating the EAR and raises
sufficient concern that prior review of
exports or reexports involving the party
and the possible imposition of license
conditions or license denial enhances
BIS’s ability to prevent violations of the
EAR.
These criteria are illustrative of
conduct that could be contrary to the
national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States. A party
could be added to the Entity List if
specific and articulable facts provided
reasonable cause to believe that it is
involved in, has been involved in, or
poses a significant risk of being or
becoming involved in one of the five
listed illustrative activities or other
activities that are contrary to U.S.
national security or foreign policy
interests.
This proposed rule also would
authorize BIS to modify the license
requirements, license exception
availability or license application
review policy that applies to any entity
placed on the Entity List pursuant to
this rule.
This proposed rule would not be used
to add to the Entity List a party to which
exports or reexports require a license
pursuant to §§ 744.12, 744.13, 744.14 or
744.18 of the EAR. Those sections
impose license requirements because of
the presence of certain parties on the
List of Specially Designated Nationals
and Blocked Persons published by the
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office
of Foreign Assets Control. This
proposed rule would not authorize
placing U.S. persons, as defined in
§ 772.1 of the EAR, on the Entity List.
All impositions of license
requirements or statements of license
application review policy or any
modification thereof made pursuant to
this rule would be required to be made
by publishing an amendment to the
Entity List found at Supplement No. 4
to part 744 of the Export Administration
Regulations. Under this proposed rule,
license exceptions are not available for
any entity added to the Entity List
pursuant to this rule unless specifically
authorized in the entry for the entity.
This proposed rule would explicitly
set forth the ability of a party who is
listed on the Entity List to request that
its listing be removed or modified. Such
requests, including reasons therefor,
would have to be made in writing, and
BIS would be required to provide a
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
written response that would be the final
agency decision on the request. Such
requests would be reviewed by the
Departments of Commerce, State,
Defense, and Energy and, if appropriate
in a particular case, the Treasury. The
interagency decision, as communicated
to the requesting entity by BIS, would
be the final agency action on such a
request.
This proposed rule would make a
conforming change to the definition of
U.S. person in § 772.1 by adding
§ 744.11 to the list of sections to which
that definition applies.
The license requirements proposed by
this rule would be an expansion of
foreign policy export controls that
would require a report to Congress in
accordance with section 6 of the Export
Administration Act. BIS will submit the
appropriate report to Congress before
implementing any such expanded
controls.
Request for Comments
BIS is seeking public comments on
this proposed rule and will consider all
comments received on or before August
6, 2007 in developing any final rule.
Comments received after that date will
be considered if possible, but their
consideration cannot be assured. All
public comments on this proposed rule
must be in writing (including fax or email) and will be a matter of public
record, available for public inspection
and copying. The Office of
Administration, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce,
displays these public comments on
BIS’s Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) Web site at https://
www.bis.doc.gov/foia. This office does
not maintain a separate public
inspection facility. If you have technical
difficulties accessing this Web site,
please call BIS’s Office of
Administration at (202) 482–0953 for
assistance.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. This rule has been determined to be
a significant rule pursuant to Executive
Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to nor be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. This rule
involves a collection of information that
has been approved by the OMB under
control number 0694–0088, ‘‘Multi-
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Purpose Application,’’ which carries a
burden hour estimate of 58 minutes to
prepare and submit form BIS–748.
Miscellaneous and recordkeeping
activities account for 12 minutes per
submission. Additionally, this rule
contains a new collection of information
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
This collection will be submitted to
OMB for approval. This rule proposes a
procedure for a listed party to request
removal or modification of its listing, as
set forth in proposed § 744.16. BIS
estimates that this new collection will
involve an annual burden of 15 hours.
Send comments regarding these
burden estimates or any other aspect of
these collections of information,
including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to David Rostker, OMB Desk
Officer, by e-mail at
david_rostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax to
(202) 395–7285; and to the Regulatory
Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce, P.O.
Box 273, Washington, DC 20044.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as this
term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
4. The provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed
rulemaking, the opportunity for public
participation, and a delay in effective
date, are inapplicable because this
regulation involves a military or foreign
affairs function of the United States (see
5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). Further, no other
law requires that a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment be given for this rule.
Because a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be
given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or
by any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are
not applicable. However, to obtain the
benefit of a variety of viewpoints before
issuing any final rule, BIS is issuing this
rule in proposed form with a request for
comments.
List of Subjects
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Terrorism.
15 CFR Part 772
Exports.
Accordingly, parts 744 and 772 of the
Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730–774) are amended as
follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jun 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
PART 744—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 744
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.;
42 U.S.C. 2139a; Sec. 901–911, Pub. L. 106–
387; Sec. 221, Pub. L. 107–56; E.O. 12058, 43
FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O.
12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994
Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3
CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR
58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O.
13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p.
208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of August
3, 2006, 71 FR 44551 (August 7, 2006); Notice
of October 27, 2006, 71 FR 64109 (October
31, 2006).
2. In § 744.1(a)(1), a new sentence
immediately following the current sixth
sentence and a new sentence
immediately following the current tenth
sentence are added, to read as follows:
§ 744.1
General provisions.
(a)(1) * * * Section 744.11 imposes
license requirements, to the extent
specified in Supplement No. 4 of this
part on entities listed in Supplement
No. 4 of this part for activities contrary
to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States.* * *
Section 744.16 sets forth the right of a
party listed in Supplement No. 4 of this
part to request that its listing be
removed or modified.
3. Section § 744.11 is added to read as
follows:
§ 744.11 License requirements that apply
to entities acting contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the
United States.
BIS may impose foreign policy export
and reexport license requirements and
limitations on availability of license
exceptions and may set license
application review policy based on the
criteria in this section. Such
requirements, limitations and policy are
in addition to those set forth elsewhere
in the EAR. License requirements,
limitations on use of license exceptions
and license application review policy
will be imposed under this section by
adding an entity to the Entity List with
a reference to this section and by stating
on the Entity List the license
requirements and license application
review policy that apply to that entity.
BIS may remove an entity from the
Entity List if it is no longer engaged in
the activities described in paragraph (b)
of this section and is unlikely to engage
in such activities in the future. BIS may
modify the license exception limitations
and license application review policy
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31007
that applies to a particular entity to
implement the policies of this section.
Any modification to the Entity List
proposed to be made pursuant to this
section will be reviewed by the
Departments of Commerce, State, and
Defense, and Energy and the Treasury as
appropriate.
(a) License Requirement, Availability
of License Exceptions, and License
Application Review Policy. A license is
required, to the extent specified on the
Entity List, to export or reexport any
item subject to the EAR to an entity that
is listed on the Entity List in an entry
that contains a reference to this section.
License Exceptions may not be used
unless authorized in that entry.
Applications for licenses required by
this section will be evaluated as stated
in that entry in addition to any other
applicable review policy stated
elsewhere in the EAR.
(b) Criteria for revising the Entity List.
Entities that BIS has reasonable cause to
believe, based on specific and
articulable facts, have been, are, or pose
a significant risk of being or becoming
involved in activities that are contrary
to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States and those
acting on behalf of such entities may be
added to the Entity List pursuant to this
section. This section may not be used to
place on the Entity List any party to
which exports or reexports require a
license pursuant to §§ 744.12, 744.13,
744.14 or 744.18 of this part. This
section may not be used to place on the
Entity List any party if exports or
reexports to that party of items that are
subject to the EAR are prohibited by or
require a license from another U.S.
government agency. This section may
not be used to place any U.S. person, as
defined in § 772.1, on the Entity List.
Examples of activities that could be
contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United
States include:
(1) Supporting persons engaged in
acts of terror;
(2) Actions that could enhance the
military capability of, or the ability to
support terrorism of governments that
have been designated by the Secretary of
State as having repeatedly provided
support for acts of international
terrorism;
(3) Transferring, developing,
servicing, repairing or producing
conventional weapons in a manner that
is contrary to United States national
security or foreign policy interests or
enabling such transfer, service, repair,
development, or production by
supplying parts, components,
technology, or financing for such
activity;
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
31008
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(4) Deliberately failing or refusing to
comply with an end use check
conducted by or on behalf of BIS or the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls of
the Department of State, by denying
access, by refusing to provide
information about parties to a
transaction, or by providing information
about such parties that is false or that
cannot be verified or authenticated; or
(5) Engaging in conduct that poses a
risk of violating the EAR and raises
sufficient concern that BIS believes that
prior review of exports or reexports
involving the party and the possible
imposition of license conditions or
license denial enhances BIS’s ability to
prevent violations of the EAR.
4. Section 744.16 is added to read as
follows:
§ 744.16 Procedure for requesting removal
or modification of an Entity List Entity.
Any entity listed on the Entity List
may request that its listing be removed
or modified.
(a) All such requests, including
reasons therefor, must be in writing and
sent to: (Address to be added in final
rule).
(b) BIS will review such requests in
conjunction with the Departments of
Defense, State and Energy, and if
appropriate in a particular case, the
Treasury.
(c) The Chair of the End User Review
Committee will convey the decision on
the request to the requester in writing.
That decision will be the final agency
action on the request.
PART 772—[AMENDED]
5. The authority citation for part 772
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025,
3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
3, 2006, 71 FR 44551 (August 7, 2006).
6. In § 772.1 the definition of U.S.
person is amended by revising
paragraph (a) introductory text to read
as follows:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 772.1 Definition of terms as used in the
Export Administration Regulations (EAR).
* * *
U.S. Person. (a) For purposes of
§§ 744.6, 744.10, 744.11, 744.12, 744.13,
and 744.14 of the EAR, the term U.S.
person includes:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 29, 2007.
Christopher A. Padilla,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–10788 Filed 6–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jun 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 62
RIN 1400–AC35
[Public Notice 5797]
Exchange Visitor Program—College
and University Students, Student
Interns
Department of State.
Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department is hereby
proposing to revise its regulations
concerning College and University
Students. The proposed Rule, if
adopted, will create a new subcategory
of the College and University Student
category—‘‘Student Interns’’.
Participation in this new sub-category is
open to foreign students enrolled and
pursuing full-time studies at a postsecondary educational institution
outside the United States. Student
interns may participate in a student
internship program for up to 12 months
at each degree level.
DATES: The Department will accept
comments on the proposed regulation
from the public up to August 6, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by any of the following
methods:
• Persons with access to the Internet
may also view this notice and provide
comments by going to the
regulations.gov Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/index.cfm.
• Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM
submissions): U.S. Department of State,
Office of Exchange Coordination and
Designation, SA–44, 301 4th Street,
SW., Room 734, Washington, DC 20547
• E-mail: jexchanges@state.gov. You
must include the RIN (1400–xxxx) in
the subject line of your message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley S. Colvin, Director, Office of
Exchange Coordination and
Designation, U.S. Department of State,
SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 734,
Washington, DC 20547; or e-mail at
jexchanges@state.gov.
The
Department of State (Department)
designates U.S. government, academic
and private sector entities to conduct
educational and cultural exchange
programs pursuant to a broad grant of
authority provided by the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, as amended (Fulbright-Hays
Act). Under this authority, designated
program sponsors facilitate the entry
into the United States of more than
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
300,000 exchange participants each
year.
The former United States Information
Agency (USIA) and, as of October 1,
1999, its successor, the Department,
have promulgated regulations governing
the Exchange Visitor Program that are
set forth at 22 CFR 62. Regulations
governing exchange visitor college and
university students appear at 22 CFR
62.23.
The Department plans to publish an
Interim Final Rule relating to exchange
visitor trainees and interns (see 22 CFR
62.22). This Interim Final Rule creates
a new exchange visitor category—the
Intern—for private sector organizations
sponsoring individuals who are
currently enrolled in and pursuing
studies at a degree- or certificategranting post-secondary academic
institution outside the United States or
have graduated from such an institution
no more than 12 months prior to his/her
exchange visitor program begin date,
and who enters the United States to
participate in a structured and guided
work-based internship program in his/
her specific academic field.
This Proposed Rule is promulgated to
make the use of a similar intern category
available to American college and
university Exchange Visitor Program
designated sponsors. Generally
speaking, the proposed regulations
governing the new student intern
category track the internship regulations
applicable to training program sponsors.
The new student intern sub-category
is available to foreign students enrolled
in accredited post-secondary
educational institutions outside the
United States. Student interns may
participate in a student internship
program for up to 12 months at each
degree level. For example, if a student
comes to the United States to participate
in a student internship program at the
equivalent of a baccalaureate program,
he/she could remain in the United
States for up to 12 months. The same
individual would be permitted another
student internship program up to 12
months at the next higher degree level,
such as a masters degree program, or
students changing majors and obtaining
a new degree.
Selection criteria for the new student
intern sub-category must include the
following requirements: The student
must be accepted to participate in an
internship by the post-secondary
educational institution listed as the
sponsor on his or her Form DS–2019
and is primarily in the United States to
engage in a student internship program
rather than to engage in employment or
provide services to an employer; the
student intern must be in good
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 5, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31005-31008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10788]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 744 and 772
[Docket No. 0612243150-63150-01]
RIN 0694-AD82
Authorization To Impose License Requirements for Exports or
Reexports to Entities Acting Contrary to the National Security or
Foreign Policy Interests of the United States
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to part 744 of the Export
Administration Regulations) provides notice to the public that certain
exports and reexports to parties identified on the Entity List require
a license from the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and that
availability of License Exceptions in such transactions is limited.
This proposed rule would expand the scope of reasons for which BIS may
add parties to the Entity List. This proposed rule would also amend the
Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to state explicitly that a
party listed on the Entity List has a right to request that its listing
be removed or modified and would set procedures for addressing such
requests.
DATES: Comments concerning this rule must be received by BIS no later
than August 6, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this rule may be submitted to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (follow the
instructions for submitting comments) by e-mail directly to BIS at
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov (refer to regulatory identification number
0694-AD82 in the subject line), by fax at (202) 482-3355, or on paper
to Regulatory Policy Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Room H2705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. Refer to
Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) 0694-AD82 in all comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Rithmire, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security,
e-mail mrithmir@bis.doc.gov, tel. ( 202) 482-6105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to part 744 of the EAR) provides
notice to the public of the identity of certain parties whose presence
as a recipient of items subject to the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) can impose a license requirement in an export or
reexport transaction. The reasons for which BIS may place an entity on
the Entity List are stated in Sec. Sec. 744.2, 744.3, 744.4, 744.6,
744.10 and 744.20 of the EAR.
In addition to those reasons, this proposed rule would create a new
Sec. 744.11 to authorize BIS to add to the Entity List entities that
BIS has reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable
facts, have been, are or pose a risk of being involved in activities
that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests
of the United States or those acting on behalf of such entities. This
new section would not be used to add to the Entity List entities that
are U.S. persons (as defined in Sec. 772.1 of the EAR). This new
section also would not be used to add to the Entity List entities for
which the EAR already impose a license requirement because those
entities are already listed on the List of Specially Designated
Nationals and Blocked Persons published by the Treasury Department,
Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Reason for the Changes Proposed by This Rule
BIS is proposing to take this action to focus its export control
efforts more closely on problematic potential recipients of items that
are subject to the EAR, but who do not meet the criteria currently set
forth in Sec. Sec. 744.2, 744.3, 744.4, 744.6, 744.10 or 744.20. With
this rule, the United States government would be able to conduct prior
review and make appropriate licensing decisions regarding proposed
exports and reexports to such recipients to the degree necessary to
protect its interests. BIS would be able to tailor license requirements
and availability of license exceptions for exports and reexports to
parties who have taken, are taking, or will take actions that are
contrary to United States national security or foreign policy interests
without imposing additional license requirements that apply broadly to
entire destinations or items. BIS believes that such targeted
application of license requirements would provide the flexibility to
deter use of items that are subject to the EAR in ways that are
inimical to the interests of the United States with minimal costs to
and
[[Page 31006]]
disruption of legitimate trade. As export controls continue to focus
not just on countries, but also on individual customers or entities,
BIS believes it is important to provide more information to the public
about entities of concern. Implementation of this rule will provide
additional information to the public to enhance the ability to screen
potential recipients of items subject to the EAR.
In addition, this proposed rule would simplify the EAR by reducing
the need to issue general orders to impose license requirements on
specific parties. License requirements currently imposed on specific
entities through general orders would, under this rule, be imposed by
adding such entities to the Entity List. Such an action would reduce
the number of EAR provisions that the public would have to review to
determine license requirements under the EAR.
Summary of the Changes Proposed by This Rule
This proposed rule would authorize BIS to impose foreign policy
export and reexport license requirements, limit the availability of
License Exceptions, and set license application review policy for
exports and reexports of items subject to the EAR to entities that BIS
has reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable
facts, have been, are or pose a risk of being involved in activities
that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests
of the United States or those acting on behalf of such entities. This
proposed rule would not require that such activities involve items or
activities that are subject to the EAR.
This proposed rule lists five types of conduct, in addition to the
grounds set forth in Sec. Sec. 744.2, 744.3, 744.4, 744.6 or 744.20,
that BIS could determine are contrary to U.S. national security or
foreign policy interests. They are: (i) Supporting persons engaged in
acts of terror; (ii) Actions that could enhance the military capability
of, or the ability to support terrorism of governments that have been
designated by the Secretary of State as having repeatedly provided
support for acts of international terrorism; (iii) Transferring,
developing, servicing, repairing, or producing conventional weapons in
a manner that is contrary to United States national security or foreign
policy interests or enabling such transfer, development, service,
repair or production by supplying parts, components, technology, or
financing for such activity; (iv) Deliberately failing or refusing to
comply with an end use check conducted by or on behalf of BIS or the
Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls by denying
access, by refusing to provide information about parties to a
transaction, or by providing information about such parties that is
false or that cannot be verified or authenticated; and (v) Engaging in
conduct that poses a risk of violating the EAR and raises sufficient
concern that prior review of exports or reexports involving the party
and the possible imposition of license conditions or license denial
enhances BIS's ability to prevent violations of the EAR.
These criteria are illustrative of conduct that could be contrary
to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United
States. A party could be added to the Entity List if specific and
articulable facts provided reasonable cause to believe that it is
involved in, has been involved in, or poses a significant risk of being
or becoming involved in one of the five listed illustrative activities
or other activities that are contrary to U.S. national security or
foreign policy interests.
This proposed rule also would authorize BIS to modify the license
requirements, license exception availability or license application
review policy that applies to any entity placed on the Entity List
pursuant to this rule.
This proposed rule would not be used to add to the Entity List a
party to which exports or reexports require a license pursuant to
Sec. Sec. 744.12, 744.13, 744.14 or 744.18 of the EAR. Those sections
impose license requirements because of the presence of certain parties
on the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons
published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign
Assets Control. This proposed rule would not authorize placing U.S.
persons, as defined in Sec. 772.1 of the EAR, on the Entity List.
All impositions of license requirements or statements of license
application review policy or any modification thereof made pursuant to
this rule would be required to be made by publishing an amendment to
the Entity List found at Supplement No. 4 to part 744 of the Export
Administration Regulations. Under this proposed rule, license
exceptions are not available for any entity added to the Entity List
pursuant to this rule unless specifically authorized in the entry for
the entity.
This proposed rule would explicitly set forth the ability of a
party who is listed on the Entity List to request that its listing be
removed or modified. Such requests, including reasons therefor, would
have to be made in writing, and BIS would be required to provide a
written response that would be the final agency decision on the
request. Such requests would be reviewed by the Departments of
Commerce, State, Defense, and Energy and, if appropriate in a
particular case, the Treasury. The interagency decision, as
communicated to the requesting entity by BIS, would be the final agency
action on such a request.
This proposed rule would make a conforming change to the definition
of U.S. person in Sec. 772.1 by adding Sec. 744.11 to the list of
sections to which that definition applies.
The license requirements proposed by this rule would be an
expansion of foreign policy export controls that would require a report
to Congress in accordance with section 6 of the Export Administration
Act. BIS will submit the appropriate report to Congress before
implementing any such expanded controls.
Request for Comments
BIS is seeking public comments on this proposed rule and will
consider all comments received on or before August 6, 2007 in
developing any final rule. Comments received after that date will be
considered if possible, but their consideration cannot be assured. All
public comments on this proposed rule must be in writing (including fax
or e-mail) and will be a matter of public record, available for public
inspection and copying. The Office of Administration, Bureau of
Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, displays these
public comments on BIS's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web site at
https://www.bis.doc.gov/foia. This office does not maintain a separate
public inspection facility. If you have technical difficulties
accessing this Web site, please call BIS's Office of Administration at
(202) 482-0953 for assistance.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. This rule has been determined to be a significant rule pursuant
to Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This rule involves a
collection of information that has been approved by the OMB under
control number 0694-0088, ``Multi-
[[Page 31007]]
Purpose Application,'' which carries a burden hour estimate of 58
minutes to prepare and submit form BIS-748. Miscellaneous and
recordkeeping activities account for 12 minutes per submission.
Additionally, this rule contains a new collection of information
subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction
Act. This collection will be submitted to OMB for approval. This rule
proposes a procedure for a listed party to request removal or
modification of its listing, as set forth in proposed Sec. 744.16. BIS
estimates that this new collection will involve an annual burden of 15
hours.
Send comments regarding these burden estimates or any other aspect
of these collections of information, including suggestions for reducing
the burden, to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, by e-mail at david_
rostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax to (202) 395-7285; and to the Regulatory
Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of
Commerce, P.O. Box 273, Washington, DC 20044.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as this term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
4. The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity for
public participation, and a delay in effective date, are inapplicable
because this regulation involves a military or foreign affairs function
of the United States (see 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). Further, no other law
requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment be given for this rule. Because a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not required to be
given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the
analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., are not applicable. However, to obtain the benefit of a
variety of viewpoints before issuing any final rule, BIS is issuing
this rule in proposed form with a request for comments.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.
15 CFR Part 772
Exports.
Accordingly, parts 744 and 772 of the Export Administration
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774) are amended as follows:
PART 744--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 744 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; Sec. 901-911, Pub. L. 106-
387; Sec. 221, Pub. L. 107-56; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978
Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608;
E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60
FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p.
208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224,
66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of August 3, 2006, 71
FR 44551 (August 7, 2006); Notice of October 27, 2006, 71 FR 64109
(October 31, 2006).
2. In Sec. 744.1(a)(1), a new sentence immediately following the
current sixth sentence and a new sentence immediately following the
current tenth sentence are added, to read as follows:
Sec. 744.1 General provisions.
(a)(1) * * * Section 744.11 imposes license requirements, to the
extent specified in Supplement No. 4 of this part on entities listed in
Supplement No. 4 of this part for activities contrary to the national
security or foreign policy interests of the United States.* * * Section
744.16 sets forth the right of a party listed in Supplement No. 4 of
this part to request that its listing be removed or modified.
3. Section Sec. 744.11 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 744.11 License requirements that apply to entities acting
contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the
United States.
BIS may impose foreign policy export and reexport license
requirements and limitations on availability of license exceptions and
may set license application review policy based on the criteria in this
section. Such requirements, limitations and policy are in addition to
those set forth elsewhere in the EAR. License requirements, limitations
on use of license exceptions and license application review policy will
be imposed under this section by adding an entity to the Entity List
with a reference to this section and by stating on the Entity List the
license requirements and license application review policy that apply
to that entity. BIS may remove an entity from the Entity List if it is
no longer engaged in the activities described in paragraph (b) of this
section and is unlikely to engage in such activities in the future. BIS
may modify the license exception limitations and license application
review policy that applies to a particular entity to implement the
policies of this section. Any modification to the Entity List proposed
to be made pursuant to this section will be reviewed by the Departments
of Commerce, State, and Defense, and Energy and the Treasury as
appropriate.
(a) License Requirement, Availability of License Exceptions, and
License Application Review Policy. A license is required, to the extent
specified on the Entity List, to export or reexport any item subject to
the EAR to an entity that is listed on the Entity List in an entry that
contains a reference to this section. License Exceptions may not be
used unless authorized in that entry. Applications for licenses
required by this section will be evaluated as stated in that entry in
addition to any other applicable review policy stated elsewhere in the
EAR.
(b) Criteria for revising the Entity List. Entities that BIS has
reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable facts,
have been, are, or pose a significant risk of being or becoming
involved in activities that are contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United States and those acting on
behalf of such entities may be added to the Entity List pursuant to
this section. This section may not be used to place on the Entity List
any party to which exports or reexports require a license pursuant to
Sec. Sec. 744.12, 744.13, 744.14 or 744.18 of this part. This section
may not be used to place on the Entity List any party if exports or
reexports to that party of items that are subject to the EAR are
prohibited by or require a license from another U.S. government agency.
This section may not be used to place any U.S. person, as defined in
Sec. 772.1, on the Entity List. Examples of activities that could be
contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the
United States include:
(1) Supporting persons engaged in acts of terror;
(2) Actions that could enhance the military capability of, or the
ability to support terrorism of governments that have been designated
by the Secretary of State as having repeatedly provided support for
acts of international terrorism;
(3) Transferring, developing, servicing, repairing or producing
conventional weapons in a manner that is contrary to United States
national security or foreign policy interests or enabling such
transfer, service, repair, development, or production by supplying
parts, components, technology, or financing for such activity;
[[Page 31008]]
(4) Deliberately failing or refusing to comply with an end use
check conducted by or on behalf of BIS or the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls of the Department of State, by denying access, by
refusing to provide information about parties to a transaction, or by
providing information about such parties that is false or that cannot
be verified or authenticated; or
(5) Engaging in conduct that poses a risk of violating the EAR and
raises sufficient concern that BIS believes that prior review of
exports or reexports involving the party and the possible imposition of
license conditions or license denial enhances BIS's ability to prevent
violations of the EAR.
4. Section 744.16 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 744.16 Procedure for requesting removal or modification of an
Entity List Entity.
Any entity listed on the Entity List may request that its listing
be removed or modified.
(a) All such requests, including reasons therefor, must be in
writing and sent to: (Address to be added in final rule).
(b) BIS will review such requests in conjunction with the
Departments of Defense, State and Energy, and if appropriate in a
particular case, the Treasury.
(c) The Chair of the End User Review Committee will convey the
decision on the request to the requester in writing. That decision will
be the final agency action on the request.
PART 772--[AMENDED]
5. The authority citation for part 772 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
3, 2006, 71 FR 44551 (August 7, 2006).
6. In Sec. 772.1 the definition of U.S. person is amended by
revising paragraph (a) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 772.1 Definition of terms as used in the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR).
* * *
U.S. Person. (a) For purposes of Sec. Sec. 744.6, 744.10, 744.11,
744.12, 744.13, and 744.14 of the EAR, the term U.S. person includes:
* * * * *
Dated: May 29, 2007.
Christopher A. Padilla,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-10788 Filed 6-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P