Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES, 30597-30598 [E7-10631]

Download as PDF hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 105 / Friday, June 1, 2007 / Notices term restoration application for X-STOP INTERSPINOUS PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM (U.S. Patent No. 6,235,030) from St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA’s assistance in determining this patent’s eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated December 12, 2006, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this medical device had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of X-STOP INTERSPINOUS PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product’s regulatory review period. FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for X-STOP INTERSPINOUS PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM is 2,224 days. Of this time, 1,538 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 686 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates: 1. The date an exemption under section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving this device became effective: October 22, 1999. The applicant claims that the investigational device exemption (IDE) required under section 520(g) of the act for human tests to begin became effective on February 11, 2000. However, FDA records indicate that the IDE was determined substantially complete for clinical studies to have begun on October 22, 1999, which represents the IDE effective date. 2. The date an application was initially submitted with respect to the device under section 515 of the act (21 U.S.C. 360e): January 6, 2004. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the premarket approval application (PMA) for X-STOP INTERSPINOUS PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM (PMA P040001) was initially submitted January 6, 2004. 3. The date the application was approved: November 21, 2005. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that PMA P040001 was approved on November 21, 2005. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension, VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:10 May 31, 2007 Jkt 211001 this applicant seeks 1,053 days of patent term extension. Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination by July 31, 2007. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by November 28, 2007. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Dated: May 7, 2007. Jane A. Axelrad, Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. [FR Doc. E7–10618 Filed 5–31–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. 2006E–0282] Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the regulatory review period for PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that medical device. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of Dockets PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30597 Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https:// www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98– 417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100–670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product’s regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive. A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A testing phase and an approval phase. For medical devices, the testing phase begins with a clinical investigation of the device and runs until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the device and continues until permission to market the device is granted. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA’s determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a medical device will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(3)(B). FDA approved for marketing the medical device, PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES. PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES is indicated for: (1) The reduction or elimination of myopia in adults with myopia ranging from -5 to -20 diopters with less than or equal to 2.5 diopters of astigmatism at the spectacle plane and whose eyes have an anterior chamber depth greater than or equal to 3.2 millimeters; and (2) patients with documented stability of refraction for the prior 6 months, as demonstrated by spherical equivalent change of less than or equal to 0.50 diopters. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES 30598 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 105 / Friday, June 1, 2007 / Notices application for PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES (U.S. Patent No. 5,192,319) from Ophtec USA, Inc., subsidiary of Ophtec B.V., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA’s assistance in determining this patent’s eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated September 5, 2006, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this medical device had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product’s regulatory review period. FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES is 2,545 days. Of this time, 2,107 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 438 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates: 1. The date an exemption under section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving this device became effective: September 24, 1997. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the date the investigational device exemption (IDE) required under section 520(g) of the act for human tests to begin became effective September 24, 1997. 2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the device under section 515 of the act (21 U.S.C. 360e): July 1, 2003. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the premarket approval application (PMA) for PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES (PMA P030028) was initially submitted July 1, 2003. 3. The date the application was approved: September 10, 2004. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that PMA P030028 was approved on September 10, 2004. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,484 days of patent term extension. Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination by July 31, 2007. Furthermore, any interested person may VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:10 May 31, 2007 Jkt 211001 petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by November 28, 2007. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Dated: May 7, 2007. Jane A. Axelrad, Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. [FR Doc. E7–10631 Filed 5–31–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. 2006E–0234] Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; GEM 21S GROWTH– FACTOR ENHANCED MATRIX AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the regulatory review period for GEM 21S GROWTH–FACTOR ENHANCED MATRIX and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that medical device. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https:// www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory Policy (HFD–007), Food and Drug PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98– 417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100–670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product’s regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive. A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A testing phase and an approval phase. For medical devices, the testing phase begins with a clinical investigation of the device and runs until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the device and continues until permission to market the device is granted. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA’s determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a medical device will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(3)(B). FDA approved for marketing the medical device, GEM 21S GROWTH– FACTOR ENHANCED MATRIX. GEM 21S GROWTH–FACTOR ENHANCED MATRIX is indicated to treat the following periodontally related defects: (1) Intrabony periodontal defects, (2) furcation periodontal defects, and (3) gingival recession associated with periodontal defects. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for GEM 21S GROWTH– FACTOR ENHANCED MATRIX (U.S. Patent No. 5,124,316) from Biomimetic Therapeutics, Inc. (previously Biomimetic Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA’s assistance in determining this patent’s eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated January 8, 2007, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this medical device had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of GEM 21S GROWTH–FACTOR E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 105 (Friday, June 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30597-30598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2006E-0282]


Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
Extension; PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
regulatory review period for PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES and is 
publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA 
has made the determination because of the submission of an application 
to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for 
the extension of a patent which claims that medical device.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of 
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments 
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory 
Policy (HFD-7), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide 
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
    A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
testing phase and an approval phase. For medical devices, the testing 
phase begins with a clinical investigation of the device and runs until 
the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial 
submission of an application to market the device and continues until 
permission to market the device is granted. Although only a portion of 
a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of 
extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (half 
the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have 
occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the 
length of a regulatory review period for a medical device will include 
all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 
156(g)(3)(B).
    FDA approved for marketing the medical device, PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR 
LENSES. PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES is indicated for: (1) The reduction 
or elimination of myopia in adults with myopia ranging from -5 to -20 
diopters with less than or equal to 2.5 diopters of astigmatism at the 
spectacle plane and whose eyes have an anterior chamber depth greater 
than or equal to 3.2 millimeters; and (2) patients with documented 
stability of refraction for the prior 6 months, as demonstrated by 
spherical equivalent change of less than or equal to 0.50 diopters. 
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a 
patent term restoration

[[Page 30598]]

application for PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES (U.S. Patent No. 5,192,319) 
from Ophtec USA, Inc., subsidiary of Ophtec B.V., and the Patent and 
Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this 
patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated 
September 5, 2006, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that 
this medical device had undergone a regulatory review period and that 
the approval of PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES represented the first 
permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the 
Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's 
regulatory review period.
    FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES is 2,545 days. Of this time, 2,107 days 
occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, 
while 438 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of 
time were derived from the following dates:
    1. The date an exemption under section 520(g) of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving this 
device became effective: September 24, 1997. FDA has verified the 
applicant's claim that the date the investigational device exemption 
(IDE) required under section 520(g) of the act for human tests to begin 
became effective September 24, 1997.
    2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
the device under section 515 of the act (21 U.S.C. 360e): July 1, 2003. 
FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the premarket approval 
application (PMA) for PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSES (PMA P030028) was 
initially submitted July 1, 2003.
    3. The date the application was approved: September 10, 2004. FDA 
has verified the applicant's claim that PMA P030028 was approved on 
September 10, 2004.
    This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. 
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in 
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,484 days of 
patent term extension.
    Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are 
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see 
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination 
by July 31, 2007. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA 
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted 
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by November 28, 
2007. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to 
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d 
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 
21 CFR 10.30.
    Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of 
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be 
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to 
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading 
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of 
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

    Dated: May 7, 2007.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E7-10631 Filed 5-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.